<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Web Brands and Parent Companies for October 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=17889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported October 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported October 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Parent Companies/Divisions for October 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Parent Company</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>156,635</td>
<td>2:34:50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>138,773</td>
<td>2:06:16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>134,745</td>
<td>3:06:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>107,482</td>
<td>6:09:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL LLC</td>
<td>91,205</td>
<td>2:30:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>News Corp. Online</td>
<td>79,817</td>
<td>1:28:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>InterActiveCorp</td>
<td>71,310</td>
<td>0:16:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>66,191</td>
<td>1:25:29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>63,372</td>
<td>0:26:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Wikimedia Foundation</td>
<td>62,084</td>
<td>0:17:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Example:  The data indicates that 62.1 million home and work Internet users visited at least one of the Wikimedia Foundation-owned sites or launched a Wikimedia Foundation-owned application during the month, and each person spent, on average, a total of 17 minutes and 7 seconds at one or more of their sites or applications.</p>
<p>The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.<span id="_marker"><br />
</span><br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Web Brands for October 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>147,861</td>
<td>1:53:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>133,537</td>
<td>3:06:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>112,340</td>
<td>1:57:40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>107,482</td>
<td>6:09:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>93,824</td>
<td>0:45:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>91,205</td>
<td>2:30:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>90,396</td>
<td>1:12:41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>61,987</td>
<td>1:44:08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>61,881</td>
<td>0:17:03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>59,580</td>
<td>1:14:14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home &amp; Work, Month of October 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metrics</th>
<th> Oct-09</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Pages per Person</td>
<td>2,645</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>67:49:39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page Viewed</td>
<td>0:00:58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>196,637,941</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>233,964,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Web Brands and Parent Companies for September 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-september-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-september-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Average Internet Usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported September 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported September 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.<br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Parent Companies/Divisions for September 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Parent</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>153,928</td>
<td>2:36:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>136,639</td>
<td>2:08:38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>134,688</td>
<td>3:08:28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>105,449</td>
<td>5:24:38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL LLC</td>
<td>89,302</td>
<td>2:40:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>News Corp. Online</td>
<td>86,290</td>
<td>1:30:36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>InterActiveCorp</td>
<td>70,900</td>
<td>0:18:33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>65,285</td>
<td>1:24:37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikimedia Foundation</td>
<td>61,321</td>
<td>0:17:29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>60,397</td>
<td>0:22:44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Example:  The data indicates that 60.4 million home and work Internet users visited at least one of the Amazon-owned sites or launched an Amazon-owned application during the month, and each person spent, on average, a total of 22 minutes and 44 seconds at one or more of their sites or applications.</p>
<p>The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.<span id="_marker"><br />
</span><br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Web Brands for September 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>144,049</td>
<td>1:53:10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>133,425</td>
<td>3:08:49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>110,778</td>
<td>2:01:03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>105,449</td>
<td>5:24:38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>92,812</td>
<td>1:12:51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>92,122</td>
<td>0:45:02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>89,302</td>
<td>2:40:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>66,756</td>
<td>1:45:50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>61,080</td>
<td>0:17:26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>58,940</td>
<td>1:17:55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home &amp; Work, Month of September 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metrics</th>
<th> Sep-09</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Pages per Person</td>
<td>2,645</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>68:00:58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page Viewed</td>
<td>0:00:57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>194,266,992</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>233,878,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-september-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Long Tail of the Net &#8211; Just How Important is it?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Buchwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Buchwalter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &#38; Analytics
There has been much talk in the Internet industry around the importance of the &#8220;long tail&#8221; (niche content and service-oriented sites) and how consumers gravitate to it.  The central concept is that people tend to be most engaged in content that is core to their specific interests, rather than more generalized content.
Looking at our newly expanded panel that includes more than 30,000 sites, we have found that short tail sites (those with a greater than 1 percent reach) remain the most engaging ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &amp; Analytics</strong></em><br />
There has been much talk in the Internet industry around the importance of the &#8220;long tail&#8221; (niche content and service-oriented sites) and how consumers gravitate to it.  The central concept is that people tend to be most engaged in content that is core to their specific interests, rather than more generalized content.</p>
<p>Looking at our newly expanded panel that includes more than 30,000 sites, we have found that short tail sites (those with a greater than 1 percent reach) remain the most engaging brands online.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1178" title="jongibs_longtail1_0713091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jongibs_longtail1_0713091.bmp" alt="jongibs_longtail1_0713091" /></p>
<p>It seems that the differentiation between the long tail and short tail is important. Long tail sites tend to have lower engagement levels than short tail sites. <span id="more-14346"></span></p>
<p>However, it would be reasonable to ask: &#8220;well, since not all short tail sites are the same, what happens to those numbers if you remove portals and large social networks?&#8221; The answer is interesting. When we look at the data in relation to the highest traffic sites on the Web (e.g., Google, Yahoo!, YouTube, MySpace, Wikipedia, Apple and Facebook) here&#8217;s what happens:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1177" title="jongibs_longtail2_0713091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jongibs_longtail2_0713091.bmp" alt="jongibs_longtail2_0713091" /></p>
<p>Long tail sites tend to have lower engagement levels than short tail sites; however, the largest jump isn&#8217;t between long tail and short tail, it is really between everyone and the top 10 sites.</p>
<p>What does this amount to? As much as anyone thinks the future is in the long tail, it&#8217;s just not the case-at least not yet. In fact, consumers feel more comfortable on large, mass media sites. We know the Internet is changing. We know there are more blogs, boards, tweets and social networks than ever before. But what&#8217;s also clear is that while the Internet itself is fragmenting (like all other media), people continue to spend their time on the sites that offer them the most options and functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Online Search Providers: May 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen Online today reported data for the top U.S. search providers, ranked by total searches, the top companies/divisions and web brands in May 2009.  Total searches increased 20 percent over May 2008.
Top 10 Search Providers for May 2009 (U.S.) 



Provider
Searches (000)
YOY Growth
Share of Searches


All Search
9,440,467
20.3%
100.0%


Google Search
5,968,840
28.2%
63.2%


Yahoo! Search
1,625,253
22.3%
17.2%


MSN/Windows Live Search
891,502
-14.6%
9.4%


AOL Search
364,784
13.1%
3.9%


Ask.com Search
205,438
21.9%
2.2%


My Web Search
77,283
44.7%
0.8%


Comcast Search
55,853
33.1%
0.6%


Yellow Pages Search
33,141
n/a*
0.4%


NexTag Search
27,189
29.9%
0.3%


AT&#38;T Worldnet Search
17,719
-32.4%
0.2%


Source: Nielsen MegaView Search



 * A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.
Google topped the list of top 10 web brands, with a unique audience of 131.2 million.  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen Online today reported data for the top U.S. search providers, ranked by total searches, the top companies/divisions and web brands in May 2009.  Total searches increased 20 percent over May 2008.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Top 10 Search Providers for May 2009 (U.S.)</strong> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Searches (000)</th>
<th>YOY Growth</th>
<th>Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">All Search</td>
<td>9,440,467</td>
<td>20.3%</td>
<td>100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Google Search</td>
<td>5,968,840</td>
<td>28.2%</td>
<td>63.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,625,253</td>
<td>22.3%</td>
<td>17.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MSN/Windows Live Search</td>
<td>891,502</td>
<td>-14.6%</td>
<td>9.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Search</td>
<td>364,784</td>
<td>13.1%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Ask.com Search</td>
<td>205,438</td>
<td>21.9%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">My Web Search</td>
<td>77,283</td>
<td>44.7%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Comcast Search</td>
<td>55,853</td>
<td>33.1%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>33,141</td>
<td>n/a*</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NexTag Search</td>
<td>27,189</td>
<td>29.9%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AT&amp;T Worldnet Search</td>
<td>17,719</td>
<td>-32.4%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen MegaView Search</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em> * A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-12797"></span>Google topped the list of top 10 web brands, with a unique audience of 131.2 million.  Yahoo! took second place, with a unique audience of 118.9 million, followed by MSN/Windows Live at 101.5 million. </p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home &amp; Work, May 2009</th>
<th> </th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>104</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Pages per Person</td>
<td>2,352</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page Viewed</td>
<td>0:00:56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>67:39:05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>168,670,941</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>230,530,606</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen NetView</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Read the full press release <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/may-search-release-616.pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Spent Viewing Video Online Up 49 Percent</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-viewing-video-online-up-49-percent/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-viewing-video-online-up-49-percent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Interactive Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen Online today released overall online video usage and top online brands ranked by video streams for May 2009.  Compared to the same month in 2008, unique viewers, total streams, streams per viewer and time per viewer were up, led by a 49 percent growth in time per viewer.
Overall Online Video Usage (U.S.)



 
May-09
Year-Over-Year
Month-Over-Month


Unique Viewers (000)
133,797
12.8%
14.7%


Total Streams (000)
10,043,049
34.8%
6.2%


Streams per Viewer
75.1
19.6%
-7.3%


Time per Viewer (min)
188.7
48.9%
-8.3%


Source: Nielsen Online, VideoCensus



 Note: Includes progressive downloads and excludes video advertising. 
YouTube was far and away the top online destination by video streams, with more than 6 billion total streams during ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen Online today released overall online video usage and top online brands ranked by video streams for May 2009.  Compared to the same month in 2008, unique viewers, total streams, streams per viewer and time per viewer were up, led by a 49 percent growth in time per viewer.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Overall Online Video Usage (U.S.)</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<th>May-09</th>
<th>Year-Over-Year</th>
<th>Month-Over-Month</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Unique Viewers (000)</td>
<td>133,797</td>
<td>12.8%</td>
<td>14.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Total Streams (000)</td>
<td>10,043,049</td>
<td>34.8%</td>
<td>6.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Streams per Viewer</td>
<td>75.1</td>
<td>19.6%</td>
<td>-7.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Time per Viewer (min)</td>
<td>188.7</td>
<td>48.9%</td>
<td>-8.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen Online, VideoCensus</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> <em>Note: Includes progressive downloads and excludes video advertising.</em> </p>
<p>YouTube was far and away the top online destination by video streams, with more than 6 billion total streams during the month, and more than 95 million unique viewers. Hulu, Yahoo!, Fox Interactive Media and ABC.com rounded out the top five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-viewing-video-online-up-49-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Search Providers for April 2009 (U.S)</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-search-providers-for-april-2009-us/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-search-providers-for-april-2009-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[April 2009 search rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[













 RANK
 Provider
 Searches (000)
 YOY Growth
 % of all Searches



All Search
8,608,488
4.40%
100.00%


1
Google Search
5,510,366
7.80%
64.0%


2
Yahoo! Search
1,406,416
-2.80%
16.3%


3
MSN/Windows Live Search
852,998
7.20%
9.9%


4
AOL Search
321,205
-8.80%
3.7%


5
Ask.com Search
181,617
5.90%
2.1%


6
My Web Search Search
59,110
3.60%
0.70%


7
Comcast Search
45,338
-1.80%
0.50%


8
Yellow Pages Search
37,160
N/A*
0.40%


9
NexTag Search
22,845
3.90%
0.30%


10
Dogpile.com Search
17,010
3.10%
0.20%


Source: Nielsen MegaView Search
* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Provider</th>
<th> Searches (000)</th>
<th> YOY Growth</th>
<th> % of all Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>8,608,488</td>
<td>4.40%</td>
<td>100.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>5,510,366</td>
<td>7.80%</td>
<td>64.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,406,416</td>
<td>-2.80%</td>
<td>16.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live Search</td>
<td>852,998</td>
<td>7.20%</td>
<td>9.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>321,205</td>
<td>-8.80%</td>
<td>3.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>181,617</td>
<td>5.90%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search Search</td>
<td>59,110</td>
<td>3.60%</td>
<td>0.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>45,338</td>
<td>-1.80%</td>
<td>0.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>37,160</td>
<td>N/A*</td>
<td>0.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>22,845</td>
<td>3.90%</td>
<td>0.30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Dogpile.com Search</td>
<td>17,010</td>
<td>3.10%</td>
<td>0.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: Nielsen MegaView Search<br />
* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-search-providers-for-april-2009-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Online Companies And Brands, Plus Internet Usage For March &#8216;09</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-online-companies-and-brands-plus-internet-usage-for-march-09/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-online-companies-and-brands-plus-internet-usage-for-march-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leading web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Onlein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=10587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company released March 2009 U.S. data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage. Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! led the way for parent companies online.


The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company released March 2009 U.S. data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage. Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! led the way for parent companies online.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10592" title="top_march_sites" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/top_march_sites.png" alt="" width="525" height="223" /></p>
<p><span id="more-10587"></span><br />
The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10594" title="web_brands_march" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/web_brands_march.png" alt="" width="525" height="235" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10596" title="web_march_usage" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/web_march_usage.png" alt="" width="400" height="186" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-online-companies-and-brands-plus-internet-usage-for-march-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March Video Streaming Soars Nearly 40% Compared To Last Year</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/march-video-streaming-soars-nearly-40-compared-to-last-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/march-video-streaming-soars-nearly-40-compared-to-last-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cencus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=10509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen&#8217;s analysis of online video viewing habits in March shows that more than 9.6 billion streams were viewed by an estimated 130 million web users. In total streams, the figure represents a nearly 9% jump over the previous month, and 38.8% increase over figures released for March 2008.
YouTube, hulu, and Yahoo! were the top three sites for streaming video, serving up more than 6 billion video streams among them.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen&#8217;s analysis of online video viewing habits in March shows that more than 9.6 billion streams were viewed by an estimated 130 million web users. In total streams, the figure represents a nearly 9% jump over the previous month, and 38.8% increase over figures released for March 2008.</p>
<p>YouTube, hulu, and Yahoo! were the top three sites for streaming video, serving up more than 6 billion video streams among them.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/march09_videocensus.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10511" title="march09_videocensus" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/march09_videocensus.png" alt="" width="525" height="342" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/march-video-streaming-soars-nearly-40-compared-to-last-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Online Search Providers: February 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-february-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-february-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen Online, approximately 8.5 billion Web searches were conducted during February 2009, a 10% percent jump from January 2008.
Google searches accounted for 63.5 percent of all Web searches with nearly 5.4 billion queries.  Yahoo, MSN, AOL and Ask.com continued to round out the top five.




 RANK
 Provider
 Searches (000)
 YOY Growth
 Share of Searches



All Search
8,494,653
10.10%
100.00%


1
Google Search
5,394,190
19.20%
63.50%


2
Yahoo! Search
1,415,354
4.00%
16.70%


3
MSN/Windows Live Search
881,050
2.40%
10.40%


4
AOL Search
320,098
-19.90%
3.80%


5
Ask.com Search
162,226
-16.90%
1.90%


6
My Web Search
55,772
-21.60%
0.70%


7
Comcast Search
42,895
1.30%
0.50%


8
Yellow Pages Search
37,636
N/A*
0.40%


9
AT&#38;T Worldnet Search
17,371
-27.60%
0.20%


10
Dogpile.com Search
15,880
-28.90%
0.20%


Source: Nielsen Online, MegaView Search




* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Nielsen Online, approximately 8.5 billion Web searches were conducted during February 2009, a 10% percent jump from January 2008.</p>
<p>Google searches accounted for 63.5 percent of all Web searches with nearly 5.4 billion queries.  Yahoo, MSN, AOL and Ask.com continued to round out the top five.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Provider</th>
<th> Searches (000)</th>
<th> YOY Growth</th>
<th> Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>8,494,653</td>
<td>10.10%</td>
<td>100.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>5,394,190</td>
<td>19.20%</td>
<td>63.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,415,354</td>
<td>4.00%</td>
<td>16.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live Search</td>
<td>881,050</td>
<td>2.40%</td>
<td>10.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>320,098</td>
<td>-19.90%</td>
<td>3.80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>162,226</td>
<td>-16.90%</td>
<td>1.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search</td>
<td>55,772</td>
<td>-21.60%</td>
<td>0.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>42,895</td>
<td>1.30%</td>
<td>0.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>37,636</td>
<td>N/A*</td>
<td>0.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>AT&amp;T Worldnet Search</td>
<td>17,371</td>
<td>-27.60%</td>
<td>0.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Dogpile.com Search</td>
<td>15,880</td>
<td>-28.90%</td>
<td>0.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: Nielsen Online, MegaView Search</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --><br />
* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-february-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Career Development Web Sites See 20 Percent Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/career-development-web-sites-see-20-percent-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/career-development-web-sites-see-20-percent-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CareerBuilder Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With more Americans out of work, career development web sites have seen a surge in traffic, according to a new report from Nielsen Online.  In January 2009, there were 49.7 million unique visitors to these sites, up from 41.5 million unique visitors in January 2008, an increase of 20 percent.
CareerBuilder Network was the top destination with 20.8 million visitors, followed by Yahoo! HotJobs and Monster, with 11.7 million and 9.5 million unique visitors, respectively.  Among age groups, the number of unique visitors to career development web sites age 65 and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/help-wanted.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8621" title="help-wanted" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/help-wanted-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>With more Americans out of work, career development web sites have seen a surge in traffic, according to a new report from Nielsen Online.  In January 2009, there were 49.7 million unique visitors to these sites, up from 41.5 million unique visitors in January 2008, an increase of 20 percent.</p>
<p>CareerBuilder Network was the top destination with 20.8 million visitors, followed by Yahoo! HotJobs and Monster, with 11.7 million and 9.5 million unique visitors, respectively.  Among age groups, the number of unique visitors to career development web sites age 65 and older increased 41 percent year-over-year to 3.6 million.</p>
<p>&#8220;With the current unstable economy and rising unemployement rate, more people are heading online to search for jobs.  While 65 used to be considered the age when most people retired, we are seeing a trend toward later retirement or partial retirement.  There&#8217;s an opportunity for publishers and advertisers to appeal to this niche by providing content that&#8217;s relevant to longtime career holders,&#8221; said Chuck Schilling, research director, agency &amp; media, Nielsen Online.</p>
<p>To read the complete press release containing more detailed information about these trends, as well as January 2009 data for the top 10 web brands and average U.S. Internet usage, click <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/career-web-sites.pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/career-development-web-sites-see-20-percent-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
