<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Wisconsin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/wisconsin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, Washingtonpost.com Top New Survey</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/rochester-democrat-and-chronicle-washingtonpostcom-top-new-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/rochester-democrat-and-chronicle-washingtonpostcom-top-new-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Des Moines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gannett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Antonio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarborough Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top newspaper websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top U.S. newspaper websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washingtonpost.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rochester Democrat and Chronicle and washingtonpost.com took top honors in Scarborough Research&#8217;s biannual Newspaper Penetration Report.  According to the survey, the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle&#8217;s print edition was read by 78 percent of the adults in the market.  It also took the top spot in the Integrated Newspaper Audience rankings, which measures the percent of adults in a market who read the newspaper in print form, on the Internet, or did both during the past week, with 80 percent.
Washingtonpost.com was the leading newspaper website, with 24 percent of adults in ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/newspaper-300x198.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-13603" title="newspaper-300x198" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/newspaper-300x198-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>The <em>Rochester Democrat and Chronicle</em> and washingtonpost.com took top honors in Scarborough Research&#8217;s biannual Newspaper Penetration Report.  According to the survey, the <em>Rochester Democrat and Chronicle&#8217;s</em> print edition was read by 78 percent of the adults in the market.  It also took the top spot in the Integrated Newspaper Audience rankings, which measures the percent of adults in a market who read the newspaper in print form, on the Internet, or did both during the past week, with 80 percent.</p>
<p>Washingtonpost.com was the leading newspaper website, with 24 percent of adults in the local market visiting the newspaper&#8217;s web site in the past week. </p>
<p><strong>Weekly Print Audience</strong> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Newspaper</th>
<th>Local Market (DMA)</th>
<th>Weekly Print Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Rochester Democrat and Chronicle</td>
<td>Rochester, NY</td>
<td>78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Des Moines Register</td>
<td>Des Moines, IA</td>
<td>69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Gannett Wisconsin Newspapers*</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Syracuse Post-Standard</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Buffalo News</td>
<td>Buffalo, NY</td>
<td>66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Scarborough Research</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em> * Gannett Wisconsin Newspapers include Appleton Post-Crescent, Fond du Lac Reporter, Green Bay Press-Gazette, Manitowoc Herald Times Repoter, Oshkosh Northwestern</em></p>
<p><strong>Weekly Website Audience</strong> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Newspaper</th>
<th>Local Market (DMA)</th>
<th>Weekly Print Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Washingtonpost.com</td>
<td>Washington, DC</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>MySanAntonio.com/Express-News.com/KENS5.com</td>
<td>San Antonio, TX</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2t</td>
<td>Austin360.com/Statesman.com</td>
<td>Austin, TX</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>NOLA.com</td>
<td>New Orleans, LA</td>
<td>19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Gannett Wisconsin Newspapers*</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Scarborough Research</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Integrated Newspaper Audience</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Newspaper</th>
<th>Local Market (DMA)</th>
<th>Weekly Print Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Rochester Democrat and Chronicle/DemocratAndChronicle.com</td>
<td>Rochester, NY</td>
<td>80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Gannett Wisconsin Newspapers*</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2t</td>
<td>Des Moines Register/DesMoinesRegister.com</td>
<td>Des Moines, IA</td>
<td>72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Syracuse Post-Standard/syracuse.com</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Buffalo News/Buffalo.com/BuffaloNews.com</td>
<td>Buffalo, NY</td>
<td>38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Scarborough Research</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Read the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/np-penetration-report-press-release-july-final-714.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/rochester-democrat-and-chronicle-washingtonpostcom-top-new-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and McCain&#8217;s Ads: Equally &#8220;Negative&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[527 groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battleground states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swing states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite finger-pointing from both sides, Barack Obama and John McCain&#8217;s presidential campaigns have run almost the same number of negative local campaign ads, Nielsen Monitor-Plus reported Thursday.
From June 3, when the primaries ended, through Sept. 7, the most recent reporting period, the McCain campaign ran 76,192 negative ads against Obama.  During the same time period, the Obama campaign placed 75,246 negative commercials against McCain.
Negative advertising by both candidates and the “527” groups that support them has concentrated in the top battleground states, led by Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.




Rank
(By # Of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1940" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button2-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Despite finger-pointing from both sides, Barack Obama and John McCain&#8217;s presidential campaigns have run almost the same number of negative local campaign ads, Nielsen Monitor-Plus reported Thursday.</p>
<p>From June 3, when the primaries ended, through Sept. 7, the most recent reporting period, the McCain campaign ran 76,192 negative ads against Obama.  During the same time period, the Obama campaign placed 75,246 negative commercials against McCain.</p>
<p>Negative advertising by both candidates and the “527” groups that support them has concentrated in the top battleground states, led by Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.</p>
<p><span id="more-1937"></span></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(By # Of Ads)</th>
<th>State</th>
<th># Of McCain Negative Ads<br />
Placed By Obama &amp; 527s</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Ohio</td>
<td>11,037</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Michigan</td>
<td>10,397</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Wisconsin</td>
<td>8,974</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pennsylvania</td>
<td>8,569</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Colorado</td>
<td>4,332</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Florida</td>
<td>4,112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Missouri</td>
<td>3,899</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Nevada</td>
<td>3,741</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Virginia</td>
<td>3,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Iowa</td>
<td>3,170</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(By # Of Ads)</th>
<th>State</th>
<th># Of Obama Negative Ads<br />
Placed By McCain &amp; 527s</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Ohio</td>
<td>14,397</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Michigan</td>
<td>12,292</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Pennsylvania</td>
<td>11,363</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Wisconsin</td>
<td>10,005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Iowa</td>
<td>7,172</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Colorado</td>
<td>6,016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Nevada</td>
<td>4,766</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Missouri</td>
<td>4,305</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>New Mexico</td>
<td>2,106</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>West Virginia</td>
<td>1,970</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The three commercials used most frequently by each candidate&#8217;s campaigns aired more than 10,000 times each.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 3 McCain Ads Against Obama</th>
<th># Of Commercials Placed On Local TV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; Obama/ Spending/Budget/ Taxes/ Men</td>
<td>16,354</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; Obama/ Higher Taxes/ Foreign Oil</td>
<td>16,215</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; Obama/ Gas / Domestic Drilling</td>
<td>10,760</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 3 Obama Ads Against McCain</th>
<th># Of Commercials Placed On Local TV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; McCain/ Iraq War/ Oil/ Economy</td>
<td>11,140</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; McCain/ Housing/ Economy</td>
<td>10,187</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; McCain/ Economy/ Taxes/ Iraq War</td>
<td>10,074</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View each candidate&#8217;s top negative ad below.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/163476" target="_blank">Newsweek</a>, <a href="http://adage.com/campaigntrail/post?article_id=131443&amp;search_phrase=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">AdAge</a>, the Chicago Tribune&#8217;s <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/obama_v_mccain_adwar_hits_both.html" target="_blank">&#8220;The Swamp&#8221;</a> political blog, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/10/03/months_later_obama_strikes_new_tone_in_mich/" target="_blank">The Boston Globe</a>, and the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-campaign3-2008oct03,0,1290211.story" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a>.</p>
<p>McCain Ad: Expensive Plans<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4QH9_jhMOBY&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4QH9_jhMOBY&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Obama Ad: Book<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7KYSeGl4bks&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7KYSeGl4bks&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

