<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rochester, Buffalo, Cleveland Top Newspaper Reading Cities</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarborough Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rochester, NY, is the top U.S. city for newspaper readership, according to a new analysis of Integrated Newspaper Audience (INA) data from Scarborough Research, a partnership between Arbitron and The Nielsen Company. A higher percentage of adults in Rochester, NY, are reading newspapers in print or online than in any other U.S. market. The INA of Rochester is 87% &#8211; meaning that 87% of adults in the Rochester DMA read a printed newspaper, a newspaper&#8217;s website, or did both during the past week. Following closely behind are Cleveland, OH and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7609" title="newspaper" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="151" height="99" /></a>Rochester, NY, is the top U.S. city for newspaper readership, according to a new analysis of <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/scarboroughini.pdf">Integrated Newspaper Audience (INA) data</a> from <a href="http://www.scarborough.com" target="_blank">Scarborough Research</a>, a partnership between Arbitron and The Nielsen Company. A higher percentage of adults in Rochester, NY, are reading newspapers in print or online than in any other U.S. market. The INA of Rochester is 87% &#8211; meaning that 87% of adults in the Rochester DMA read a printed newspaper, a newspaper&#8217;s website, or did both during the past week. Following closely behind are Cleveland, OH and Buffalo, NY, each with an INA of 86%. In the 81 local markets measured by Scarborough, 75% of adults read the newspaper weekly in print or online.</p>
<p>&#8220;This data begs the question: is the constant negative news feed on the industry warranted when newspapers are actually being read by three-fourths of the adult population? When you look at audience data, it seems irrational that advertisers are leaving newspapers because the numbers speak for themselves,&#8221; said Gary Meo, senior vice president, print and digital media, Scarborough Research.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top Local Markets for Integrated Newspaper Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> DMA® %</th>
<th> %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Rochester, NY</td>
<td>87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Cleveland/Akron, OH</td>
<td>86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Buffalo, NY</td>
<td>86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pittsburgh, PA</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Hartford/New Haven, CT</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Albany/Schenectady/Troy, NY</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>New York, NY</td>
<td>84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, PA</td>
<td>84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">source: Scarborough Research</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top 10 Newspaper Websites: February 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> News Source</th>
<th> Readership</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NYTimes.com</td>
<td>20,126,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>USATODAY.com</td>
<td>13,430,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>washingtonpost.com</td>
<td>9,240,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>LA Times</td>
<td>8,421,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Wall Street Journal Online</td>
<td>6,842,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>5,659,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>New York Post</td>
<td>5,121,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Daily News Online Edition</td>
<td>4,924,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Chicago Tribune</td>
<td>4,016,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Politico</td>
<td>3,726,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">source: Nielsen Online US, Home and Work</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election Gives Online News Sites Major Traffic Boost</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/election-gives-online-news-sites-major-traffic-boost/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/election-gives-online-news-sites-major-traffic-boost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=4719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News sites like MSNBC, the Huffington Post, Fox News, ABC, and the Washington Post, all saw significant gains in traffic with pre-election coverage according to Nielsen Online, which compared October 2008 visits with stats from October 2007.
MSNBC Digital Network topped the list of news sites with nearly 41M unique visitors, a 37% jump from the prior year.
The news/opinion site the Huffington Post placed 18th on the list, but showed the greatest traffic gain. It&#8217;s 8.1M unique readers for October 2008 was a 448% improvement over the prior year.
CNN, Yahoo!, AOL, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/online_news-better-option.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4725" title="online_news-better-option" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/online_news-better-option-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>News sites like MSNBC, the Huffington Post, Fox News, ABC, and the Washington Post, all saw significant gains in traffic with pre-election coverage according to <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com" target="_blank">Nielsen Online</a>, which compared October 2008 visits with stats from October 2007.</p>
<p>MSNBC Digital Network topped the list of news sites with nearly 41M unique visitors, a 37% jump from the prior year.</p>
<p>The news/opinion site the Huffington Post placed 18th on the list, but showed the greatest traffic gain. It&#8217;s 8.1M unique readers for October 2008 was a 448% improvement over the prior year.</p>
<p>CNN, Yahoo!, AOL, and the New York Times rounded out the top five in overall traffic.</p>
<p>More at <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003890933" target="_blank">Editor &amp; Publisher</a>.</p>
<h3>Top 30 News Sites For October 2008</h3>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>SITE</th>
<th>UNIQUES</th>
<th>% GAIN<br />
FROM OCT 07</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>MSNBC Digital Network</td>
<td>40,946,000</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>CNN Digital Network</td>
<td>38,489,000</td>
<td>27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo! News</td>
<td>37,340,000</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL News</td>
<td>20,827,000</td>
<td>1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>NYTimes.com</td>
<td>20,348,000</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Tribune Newspapers</td>
<td>17,714,000</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>ABCNEWS Digital Network</td>
<td>15,479,000</td>
<td>43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fox News Digital Network</td>
<td>14,269,000</td>
<td>51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Gannett Newspapers and Newspaper Division</td>
<td>12,924,000</td>
<td>-5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Google News</td>
<td>12,534,000</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">11</td>
<td>washingtonpost.com</td>
<td>12,375,000</td>
<td>43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">12</td>
<td>USATODAY.com</td>
<td>11,381,000</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">13</td>
<td>CBS News Digital Network</td>
<td>11,004,000</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">14</td>
<td>McClatchy Newspaper Network</td>
<td>10,946,000</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">15</td>
<td>BBC</td>
<td>8,962,000</td>
<td>7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">16</td>
<td>Hearst Newspapers Digital</td>
<td>8,864,000</td>
<td>19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">17</td>
<td>MediaNews Group Newspapers</td>
<td>8,599,000</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">18</td>
<td>The HuffingtonPost.com</td>
<td>8,107,000</td>
<td>448%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">19</td>
<td>Advance Internet</td>
<td>8,012,000</td>
<td>19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">20</td>
<td>WorldNow</td>
<td>7,547,000</td>
<td>-36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">21</td>
<td>Topix</td>
<td>6,815,000</td>
<td>6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">22</td>
<td>Slate</td>
<td>6,548,000</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">23</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>6,133,000</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">24</td>
<td>Cox Newspapers</td>
<td>5,621,000</td>
<td>26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">25</td>
<td>Gannett Broadcasting</td>
<td>5,323,000</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">26</td>
<td>Fox Television Stations</td>
<td>5,098,000</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">27</td>
<td>NPR</td>
<td>5,032,000</td>
<td>52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">28</td>
<td>New York Post Holdings</td>
<td>5,000,000</td>
<td>32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">29</td>
<td>MailOnline</td>
<td>4,795,000</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">30</td>
<td>Daily News Online Edition</td>
<td>4,671,000</td>
<td>33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/election-gives-online-news-sites-major-traffic-boost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

