<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Breaking Teen Myths</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/breaking-teen-myths/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/breaking-teen-myths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogames]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The notion that teens are too busy texting and Twittering to be engaged with traditional media is exciting, but false. To develop the best strategy around teens and media, start by challenging popular assumptions about teens.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/content/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/home/insights/consumer_insight/August2009/breaking_teen_myths.mbc.80326.ImageSrc.jpg" alt="" width="542" height="151" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Nic Covey, Director of Insights, The Nielsen Company</em></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>SUMMARY: </strong>It’s easy to get caught up in the hype around teenagers. The notion that teens are too busy texting and Twittering to be engaged with traditional media is exciting, but false. To develop the best strategy around teens and media, start by challenging popular assumptions about teens. Don’t focus on the outliers, but on the macro-level trends of media and preferences for the segment. The averages will show you that teens can often be reached by the same means as their parents.</p></blockquote>
<p>In the recent report, <em><a class="OrangeSubhead" href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/documents/pdf/white_papers_and_reports.Par.48571.File.dat/Nielsen_HowTeensUseMedia_June2009.pdf">How Teens Use Media</a></em>, Nielsen debunks many of the myths around teen media consumption. This article excerpts some of the most important findings of that study:</p>
<p><strong>Myth: Teens are abandoning TV for new media</strong></p>
<p><strong>Reality: Television still accounts for most of a teen’s media clock</strong><br />
In fact, they’ve been watching more TV than ever—up 6% over the past five years in the U.S. Nielsen’s A2M2 Three Screen Report showed that the typical teen television viewer watched 104:24 (hh:mm) of television per month in the first quarter of 2009. While less than the average for all television viewers (153:27), it tops teen Internet</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: small; color: #6ea3ba;"><strong>U.S. teens actually watch less television per day than most&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>use over the course of a month considerably (11:32).</p>
<p>Compared to teens in other markets where TV viewing is measured electronically by Nielsen, U.S. teens actually watch less television per day than most. In South Africa, teens averaged more than five hours per day of TV viewing. In Taiwan, teens averaged just 2 hours and 47 minutes.</p>
<p>Online video is becoming an important part of the overall teen viewing experience. Twelve million U.S. teens—about two-thirds of those online—watched online video in May 2009.  Year-over-year, the audience grew 10% and the average number of minutes increased a stunning 79% to 3 hours and 6 minutes per month among viewers. Torrid growth, yes, but surprisingly, the average teen still lags behind viewing of adults 18-24, adults 25-32 and adults 35-44.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: small; color: #6ea3ba;"><strong>Males make up 73% of the teen mobile audience&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As mobile network speeds and device capabilities improve, more teens are looking to their phones for video as well. In the first quarter of 2009, 18% of U.S. teens 13–17 with mobile phones watched some form of video content on their phone. The experience has been much more popular with teen males, who make up 73% of the teen mobile audience. Teens who watch mobile video do so much more than the average mobile video user—watching 6 hours and 30 minutes a month compared to just 3 hours and 37 minutes.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: Teens are the biggest users of the Internet </strong></p>
<p><strong>Reality: With fewer hours at a connected desk, teens actually use the Internet less than most</strong><br />
Many consider teens of today to be the Internet generation: Born roughly between 1990 and 1996, today’s teens grew up with a mouse in their hands. They are portrayed as Digital Natives, perpetually connected, guided by both the opportunities and constraints of worldwide connectivity. Indeed, some 90% of U.S. teens have access to the Internet at home, and 73% have access on a school PC. Among teens with Internet access at home, 55% say they have a wireless connection at home.</p>
<p>Teens spend 11 hours and 32 minutes per month online—far below the average of 29 hours and 15 minutes. As with other media, the gap between teen and adult time spent is less an indication of interest and more a function of access. Unlike adults, many of whom spend hours of the work day with a broadband Internet connection, much of a teen’s waking moments are spent in the classroom, at extracurricular activities, at a part-time job and moving about an otherwise hyper-social high school ecosystem.</p>
<p><img id="/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/august_2009#Par.29860.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/august_2009.Par.29860.Image.gif" alt="Time Online" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Across the markets, teen Internet use mirrors the Internet use of adults in many ways. The most popular online categories for teens—general interest portals and search—are the same as for their elders. Member</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: small; color: #6ea3ba;"><strong>Teen Internet use mirrors the Internet use of adults..</strong><strong>.</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>communities (social networks and blogs) do have a unique place within the teen experience, though. In the U.S., nearly half of online teens 12–17 visited MySpace and Facebook in May 2009 (45% and 44%, respectively). Reach of these sites among teens is still slightly higher than among all U.S. Internet users, though the demographics of social networking are expanding (41% of U.S. Internet users visited Facebook and 33% visited MySpace in May 2009). Teens make slightly more prolific online publishers, too. Two-thirds (67%) of teen social networkers say they update their page at least once a week, compared to just half (53%) of all social networkers.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Myth: The only way to reach Teens over the phone is through texting</strong></p>
<p><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Reality: Teens are early adopters of ALL mobile media</strong><br />
Teens do text at phenomenal rates, but that’s not all they do on their phones. Increasingly, the mobile phone plays a critical role in the media lives of teens. In the U.S., 77% of teens have their own mobile phone and another 11% say they regularly borrow one.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: small; color: #6ea3ba;"><strong>83% of U.S. mobile teens use text-messaging&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal">Of all the mobile behaviors of teens, texting is most talked about. Fingers flying and phone cameras flashing, 83% of U.S. mobile teens use text-messaging and 56% use MMS/picture messaging. The average U.S. mobile teen now sends or receives an average of 2,899 text-messages per month compared to 191 calls. The average number of texts has gone up 566% in just two years, far surpassing the average number of calls, which has stayed nearly steady.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img id="/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/august_2009#Par.54263.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/august_2009.Par.54263.Image.gif" alt="Average Texts" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Still, texting isn’t the only means of communicating with teens over the mobile phone. Teens are avid users of a wide variety of advanced mobile data features. More than one-third of teens download ringtones, instant message or use the mobile Web, while about one-quarter of U.S. teens download games and applications. To a lesser extent, teens are using video messaging (26%), watching mobile video (18%) and using location-based services on their phone (16%).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img id="/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/august_2009#Par.87719.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/august_2009.Par.87719.Image.gif" alt="Mobile Media" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Myth: All gamers are teens and all teens do is game</strong></p>
<p><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Reality: Teens account for just 23% of the console audience and less than 10% of PC gaming minutes</strong><br />
When we think of teen media use, gaming is often one of the first activities that come to mind. Over the course of the past 20 years, though, the gaming audience has broadened. New devices and games have extended gaming beyond boys to girls, young adults, and with the introduction of Nintendo’s Wii, people on the younger and older sides of the demographic spectrum. In the fourth quarter of 2008, teens 12–17 made up 23% of the U.S. console gaming audience, over indexing for their overall audience composition, but still leaving three-quarters of console minutes for older and younger gamers. On the PC, teens account for fewer than 10% of all game minutes played in a typical month—a medium that has done a better job attracting females ages 25–54.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Though teens don’t make up the entirety of the video gaming audience, the medium does reach most of them in some way. Today, 83% of U.S. teens have at least one console in their home. Seventy-five percent of males 12–17 and 57% of females 12–17 used a console at least once during the fourth quarter of 2008 (compared to 36% of the total population, two and older). The typical teen averaged 25 minutes of console use per day last year—considerably less than they spent on TV, but comparable to their time spent online. The average time spent is significantly higher for teen boys (41 minutes) than teen girls (8 minutes).</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: small; color: #6ea3ba;"><strong>The games they choose to play may surprise some&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal">The games they choose to play may surprise some, who think teens spend all of their time on shooter games. Of the top five most anticipated video games among teens since 2005, just two were rated “Mature” by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB), two were rated “Teen” and one was rated “Everyone”. The most anticipated video game among gamers 13–17 since 2005 has been <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Halo 3</em>, a first-person shooter game rated “Mature” by the ESRB. At its peak, 61% of active gamers said they had a definite interest in <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Halo 3</em>. The other Mature-rated game in the top five was <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Grand Theft Auto IV</em>, which—with a 37% “definite interest” among teens—tied <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Guitar Hero: Aerosmith</em> (rated Teen) for the second most anticipated video game. <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Mario Party 7</em> (33%) and <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Guitar Hero: World Tour</em> (32%) round out the list of the five most anticipated games. Play-along music and fantasy driving games, it turns out, are as relevant to the teen gaming experience as some more violent or mature ones.</p>
<p><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">In a word, teens are more “normal” than most think</strong><br />
It’s true: the media universe is expanding for teens. Social networks are playing an increasingly important role and many teens are accessing the Web over their phones. Teens are time-shifting video with DVRs and place-shifting on their video MP3 players. Yet teens are not unique in this media revolution. The media experience has evolved, and cross-platform engagement will be critical to reaching all consumers, not just teens. Media innovations have impacted everyone’s experience—not just the <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">High School Musical</em> set.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As the Nielsen report, <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/documents/pdf/white_papers_and_reports.Par.48571.File.dat/Nielsen_HowTeensUseMedia_June2009.pdf">How Teens Use Media</a></em>, argues more fully, it isn’t necessary to reconfigure the playbook to reach this highly-buzzed about audience. Discard the assumption that, as a rule, teens are “alien” and plan for them as you would any demographic segment—with careful attention and calculus, not panic. Keep your eye on the averages, keep your head on your shoulders and before you rewire the system, remind yourself: Teens are people, too.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">For additional insights on teen media use, including further detail on these categories plus theatrical activity, DVR and DVD use, newspaper readership, music consumption and advertising engagement, download a free copy of Nielsen’s full report, <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/documents/pdf/white_papers_and_reports.Par.48571.File.dat/Nielsen_HowTeensUseMedia_June2009.pdf">How Teens Use Media</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/breaking-teen-myths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Younger Boomers Are Top Video Media Consumers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/younger-boomers-are-top-video-media-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/younger-boomers-are-top-video-media-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ball State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council for Research Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viewing habits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A  ground-breaking study conducted by Ball State University&#8217;s Center for Media  Design and Sequent Partners found that younger baby boomers &#8211; those 45-54 years  old &#8211; are the top consumers of video media.
Conducted on  behalf of the Nielsen-funded Council for Research Excellence, the study ran over  the course of a year and used a custom media collector program developed by Ball  State.  Researchers gathered a wide range of data usage of any of  the four categories of screens: traditional TVs (including DVD/VCR and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dtv_icon.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" />A  ground-breaking study conducted by <a href="http://cms.bsu.edu/Academics/CentersandInstitutes/CMD.aspx">Ball State University&#8217;s Center for Media  Design</a> and <a href="http://www.sequentpartners.com" target="_blank">Sequent Partners</a> found that younger baby boomers &#8211; those 45-54 years  old &#8211; are the top consumers of video media.</p>
<p>Conducted on  behalf of the Nielsen-funded <a href="http://www.researchexcellence.com" target="_blank">Council for Research Excellence</a>, the study ran over  the course of a year and used a custom media collector program developed by Ball  State.  Researchers gathered a wide range of data usage of any of  the four categories of screens: traditional TVs (including DVD/VCR and DVR  viewing), computers, mobile devices and &#8220;all other screens,&#8221; including in-cinema  movies, GPS and display screens outside of the home.</p>
<h3>Key findings of the study include:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Consumers aged 45-54 racked up an average of more than 9 1/2 hours  of screen time a day.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The average for all other age groups was similar at roughly 8 1/2  hours.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Computer video watching took on average just two minutes a  day.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>TV  still dominates, even among those aged 18-24.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Radio usage has dropped to third, behind TV and computer usage, but  ahead of print media.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>TV  viewers were exposed to an average of 72 minutes of TV ads and promos every day,  dispelling the conventional wisdom that people are channel-hopping or otherwise  avoiding ads.</li>
</ul>
<p>Read the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cre_observationalstudy.pdf">press release</a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cre_study_0326091.pdf"></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/younger-boomers-are-top-video-media-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Hispanic TV Rankings: December 15 &#8211; 21, 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-hispanic-tv-rankings-december-15-21-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-hispanic-tv-rankings-december-15-21-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuidado Con El Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuego En La Sangre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanish language media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Univision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



RANK
NAME
NETWORK
DAY
VIEWERS (P2+)


1
FUEGO EN LA SANGRE MON-12/15/2008
UNI
Monday
5,060,000


2
CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL MON-12/15/2008
UNI
Monday
4,871,000


3
FUEGO EN LA SANGRE TUE-12/16/2008
UNI
Tuesday
4,852,000


4
FUEGO EN LA SANGRE WED-12/17/2008
UNI
Wednesday
4,725,000


5
CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL TUE-12/16/2008
UNI
Tuesday
4,723,000


6
CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL WED-12/17/2008
UNI
Wednesday
4,692,000


7
FUEGO EN LA SANGRE FRI-12/19/2008
UNI
Friday
4,586,000


8
CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL THU-12/18/2008
UNI
Thursday
4,543,000


9
FUEGO EN LA SANGRE THU-12/18/2008
UNI
Thursday
4,489,000


10
CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL FRI-12/19/2008
UNI
Friday
4,325,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (December 15, 2008 &#8211; December 21, 2008)




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>NAME</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>DAY</th>
<th>VIEWERS (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE MON-12/15/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Monday</td>
<td>5,060,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL MON-12/15/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Monday</td>
<td>4,871,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE TUE-12/16/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Tuesday</td>
<td>4,852,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE WED-12/17/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Wednesday</td>
<td>4,725,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL TUE-12/16/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Tuesday</td>
<td>4,723,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL WED-12/17/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Wednesday</td>
<td>4,692,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE FRI-12/19/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Friday</td>
<td>4,586,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL THU-12/18/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Thursday</td>
<td>4,543,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE THU-12/18/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Thursday</td>
<td>4,489,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL FRI-12/19/2008</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>Friday</td>
<td>4,325,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (December 15, 2008 &#8211; December 21, 2008)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-hispanic-tv-rankings-december-15-21-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Transition: Unready U.S. Homes Decline In December</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/digital-transition-unready-us-homes-decline-in-december/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/digital-transition-unready-us-homes-decline-in-december/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preparation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The penetration of U.S. households completely unready for the transition to digital television dropped from 7.4% in November to 6.8% in December, Nielsen reported Friday.
Non-Hispanic households continue to be more ready for the transition than Hispanic households, but the rate of Hispanic readiness is picking up. After seeing no change in unready Hispanic households from October to November, that percentage dropped from 12.4% to 11.5% in December.




Month
% Hispanic Households
That Are
Completely Unready
% Non-Hispanic Households
That Are
Completely Unready


May 2008
14.4%
9.2%


June 2008
14.9%
8.9%


July 2008
14.5%
8.6%


August 2008
13.4%
8.3%


September 2008
13.0%
7.9%


October 2008
12.4%
7.1%


November 2008
12.4%
6.7%


December 2008
11.5%
6.2%


Source: The Nielsen Company (May 2008 &#8211; December ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tv2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6288" title="tv2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tv2-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>The penetration of U.S. households completely unready for the transition to digital television dropped from 7.4% in November to 6.8% in December, Nielsen <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/december-dtv-readinessalert2.pdf">reported</a> Friday.</p>
<p>Non-Hispanic households continue to be more ready for the transition than Hispanic households, but the rate of Hispanic readiness is picking up. After seeing no change in unready Hispanic households from October to November, that percentage dropped from 12.4% to 11.5% in December.</p>
<p><span id="more-6280"></span></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Month</th>
<th>% Hispanic Households<br />
That Are<br />
Completely Unready</th>
<th>% Non-Hispanic Households<br />
That Are<br />
Completely Unready</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">May 2008</td>
<td>14.4%</td>
<td>9.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">June 2008</td>
<td>14.9%</td>
<td>8.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">July 2008</td>
<td>14.5%</td>
<td>8.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">August 2008</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">September 2008</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
<td>7.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">October 2008</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
<td>7.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">November 2008</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
<td>6.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">December 2008</td>
<td>11.5%</td>
<td>6.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (May 2008 &#8211; December 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Younger households remain the least ready, but this month has seen their strongest monthly surge in preparation, with unready households dropping from 10.6% in November to 9.9% in December.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Month</th>
<th>% Households With Adult<br />
Head Of House &lt;35:<br />
Completely Unready</th>
<th>% Households<br />
With Adult Head Of House 35-54:<br />
Completely Unready</th>
<th>% Households<br />
With Adult Head Of House 55+:<br />
Completely Unready</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">May 2008</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
<td>9.6%</td>
<td>8.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">June 2008</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
<td>9.4%</td>
<td>8.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">July 2008</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
<td>9.2%</td>
<td>7.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">August 2008</td>
<td>11.5%</td>
<td>8.9%</td>
<td>7.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">September 2008</td>
<td>11.1%</td>
<td>8.2%</td>
<td>7.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">October 2008</td>
<td>10.6%</td>
<td>7.3%</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">November 2008</td>
<td>10.6%</td>
<td>7.0%</td>
<td>5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">December 2008</td>
<td>9.9%</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
<td>5.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (May 2008 &#8211; December 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>In the 56 local markets with metered measurements, Albuquerque is the most unprepared market with 13% of households still completely unprepared.  Tulsa (12.65%), Houston (12.41%), Dallas-Ft. Worth (11.71%), and Salt Lake City (10.63%) are the next four on the list.</p>
<p>Hartford-New Haven is the most prepared of Nielsen&#8217;s 56 metered markets &#8212; with only 2.6% of households still in need of a digital upgrade.</p>
<p>View complete data on digital preparedness in Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/simple-december-dtv-preparednessrank.pdf">56 top local metered markets</a>.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 5<br />
Least Prepared<br />
Local Metered Markets</th>
<th>% Households Completely Unprepared</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Albuquerque</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tulsa</td>
<td>12.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Houston</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Dallas-Ft. Worth</td>
<td>11.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Salt Lake City</td>
<td>10.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (May 2008 &#8211; December 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 5<br />
Best Prepared<br />
Local Metered Markets</th>
<th>% Households Completely Unprepared</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hartford-New Haven</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Atlanta</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Boston (Manchester)</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">New York</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (May 2008 &#8211; December 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As the February 17, 2009 digital transition approaches, Nielsen will continue to track the readiness of TV households in the U.S. </p>
<p>Readiness data are based on TV sets and households in Nielsen’s National People Meter panel, which is representative of U.S. television households, and Nielsen’s local metered panels, which are representative of their respective television household populations.</p>
<p>View the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/december-dtv-readinessalert3.pdf">media alert</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122990289328925089.html?mod=most_viewed_tech24" target="_blank">The Wall Street Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6624284.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Broadcasting &amp; Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3id78469d811368539902a646b58df4271" target="_blank">The Hollywood Reporter</a>, <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6624262.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Multichannel News</a> and <a href="http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20081221/BUSINESS/812210329" target="_blank">The Coloradoan</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/digital-transition-unready-us-homes-decline-in-december/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Ad Spending Through Q3 2008 Dips 0.6%</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-ad-spending-through-q3-2008-dips-06/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-ad-spending-through-q3-2008-dips-06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive dealerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procter & Gamble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Third quarter data released Thursday by Nielsen showed a small decline in ad spending from January to September of this year.
Overall ad spending dropped 0.6% in the first nine months of 2008, compared to the same time period in 2007. 
The drop came despite overall growth in TV advertising.  Four of the top-five growing media were TV-based.

The top three ad spending industries &#8212; Automotive (-8%), Pharmaceutical (-4%), and Local Auto Dealerships (-3%) &#8212; all decreased their advertising, compared to last year.  The remaining top ten industries either showed increased or flat ad spending.  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/down_trend_use-this-one1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6142" title="down_trend_use-this-one1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/down_trend_use-this-one1-300x270.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="135" /></a>Third quarter data <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/pr-q3-2008-spending2.pdf">released Thursday by Nielsen</a> showed a small decline in ad spending from January to September of this year.</p>
<p>Overall ad spending dropped 0.6% in the first nine months of 2008, compared to the same time period in 2007. </p>
<p>The drop came despite overall growth in TV advertising.  Four of the top-five growing media were TV-based.</p>
<p><span id="more-6140"></span></p>
<p>The top three ad spending industries &#8212; Automotive (-8%), Pharmaceutical (-4%), and Local Auto Dealerships (-3%) &#8212; all decreased their advertising, compared to last year.  The remaining top ten industries either showed increased or flat ad spending.  Direct Response Products, which increased ad spending by 27% in 2008, showed the largest growth.</p>
<p>During the first three quarters of 2008, Procter &amp; Gamble continued to outspend all other advertisers, despite reducing its ad spending by 7% &#8212; to $2.3 billion &#8212; vs. the same time period last year.  General Motors and AT&amp;T were the second and third largest advertisers, with $1.7 billion and $1.3 billion in ad spending, respectively.</p>
<p>View the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/pr-q3-2008-spending3.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings by the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j0jjodiwMCJ_ZEOSEZNyGkWXyCmAD9558M5G0" target="_blank">Associated Press</a> and in <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6623825.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Broadcasting &amp; Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6623983.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Multichannel News</a>, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i260af0867f21cdd36034f28a359bdad0" target="_blank">The Hollywood Reporter</a>, <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/media/e3i260af0867f21cdd38a1b4890de878cd0" target="_blank">Adweek</a>, and <a href="http://www.medialifemagazine.com/artman2/publish/Hereandthere/Nielsen_Ad_spending_falls_0_6_percent.asp" target="_blank">Media Life</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-ad-spending-through-q3-2008-dips-06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holiday Blog Buzz Battle: Xbox Bests Wii, Playstation</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/holiday-blog-buzz-battle-xbox-bests-wii-playstation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/holiday-blog-buzz-battle-xbox-bests-wii-playstation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft’s Xbox is the most buzzed about game console so far this holiday season, Nielsen Online reported Thursday.
The Xbox 360 garnered the largest share of online buzz between November 1 and December 9, with 41.6% of blog messages mentioning Xbox, Wii or Playstation.
In comparison, Nintendo’s Wii was mentioned in 29.8% of game console blog messages, while Sony’s Playstation ranked third with mentions in 28.6% of gaming-related blog posts.

Among gift-related online buzz, TV-related terms, mentioned in 52.5% of gift-related messages, dominated blogosphere chatter.
DVDs (24.4% share), toys (11.3% share), laptops (8.4% share), and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/blog.jpg"></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/blog_use-this-onejpg.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5677" title="blog_use-this-onejpg" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/blog_use-this-onejpg-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a>Microsoft’s Xbox is the most buzzed about game console so far this holiday season, Nielsen Online <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/buzzblast_121108_final1.pdf">reported</a> Thursday.</p>
<p>The Xbox 360 garnered the largest share of online buzz between November 1 and December 9, with 41.6% of blog messages mentioning Xbox, Wii or Playstation.</p>
<p>In comparison, Nintendo’s Wii was mentioned in 29.8% of game console blog messages, while Sony’s Playstation ranked third with mentions in 28.6% of gaming-related blog posts.</p>
<p><span id="more-5639"></span></p>
<p>Among gift-related online buzz, TV-related terms, mentioned in 52.5% of gift-related messages, dominated blogosphere chatter.</p>
<p>DVDs (24.4% share), toys (11.3% share), laptops (8.4% share), and GPS (3.4% share) rounded out the select five gift ideas.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>View the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/buzzblast_121108_final.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/holiday-blog-buzz-battle-xbox-bests-wii-playstation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale Of Two Election Day Media: Internet Vs. TV News</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/a-tale-of-two-media-internet-tv-news-on-election-day/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/a-tale-of-two-media-internet-tv-news-on-election-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet played an important role in the 2008 election campaign, so it&#8217;s no surprise that on Election Day, people used multiple news sources to follow results.  By combining television and Internet samples through a process known as fusion, Nielsen provides new data showing how the two media worked together to meet the demand for election news updates.
A total of 163.6 million adults sought election coverage from either television or the Internet &#8212; or both. This shows the unduplicated or cumulative audience that used one or the other medium for at ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/election2008_button.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5622" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/election2008_button-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The Internet played an important role in the 2008 election campaign, so it&#8217;s no surprise that on Election Day, people used multiple news sources to follow results.  By combining television and Internet samples through a process known as fusion, Nielsen provides new data showing how the two media worked together to meet the demand for election news updates.</em></p>
<p>A total of 163.6 million adults sought election coverage from either television or the Internet &#8212; or both. This shows the unduplicated or cumulative audience that used one or the other medium for at least one minute.</p>
<p>158.3 million watched Election Day coverage on television. Of those, 134.8 million <em>only</em> watched TV coverage.</p>
<p>28.8 million used the Internet to get Election Day coverage from major news websites. Of those, 5.2 million <em>only</em> used the Internet for election coverage.</p>
<p>23.6 million got Election Day coverage from <em>both</em> TV and the Internet. Of these, 48% of these accessed online Election Day coverage only while at work; 42% got their online coverage only at home; and 10% checked online coverage both at home and at work.</p>
<p><span id="more-5619"></span></p>
<p><strong>Demographic Breakdown</strong><br />
From an overall reach perspective, adults aged 50+ were more likely than younger adults to seek Election Day news from TV or Internet &#8212; 80% of these adults were reached by one or the other medium, compared to 60% for 18-34s and 76% for 35-49s.</p>
<p>The demographic difference between the TV audience and the online audience wasn&#8217;t &#8220;younger&#8221; versus &#8220;older&#8221; &#8212; but rather, &#8220;middle-aged&#8221; versus &#8220;older.&#8221;</p>
<p>Younger adults between the ages of 18-34 made up about a quarter of the audience for both television and the Internet, but from there online coverage skewed younger than television:</p>
<p>-Adults 18-34 were 24.8% of the TV audience and 24.4% of the online audience.</p>
<p>-Adults 35-49 made up 40.7% of the online audience, but only 29.5% of the TV audience.</p>
<p>-Adults over the age of 50 made up 46% of the TV audience and accounted for 35% of the Internet users.</p>
<p>In addition, there are decided differences in demographic composition, based on whether people accessed election coverage online only, on TV only, or both on TV and online:</p>
<p>-Internet Only Users were the youngest: 34.5% were aged 18-34, compared to 34.0% for 35-49 and 31.5% for 50+.</p>
<p>-TV Only Users were the oldest: 25.3% were aged 18-34, 27.3% were aged 35-49, 47.4% were 50+.</p>
<p>-People who accessed Election coverage on both TV and online skewed 35-49: 22.2% were aged 18-34, 42.2% were 35-49, 35.6% were 50+.</p>
<p><strong><br />
Convergence Panel Results</strong><br />
A new Nielsen sample tracks both Internet and television usage with a single sample, making it possible to see how people used the two media simultaneously to check Election Day results.  This &#8220;convergence panel&#8221; shows that while simultaneous use of TV and Internet for Election Day coverage was limited, TV and online news outlets drew larger than average audiences:</p>
<p>-Only 1% of TV viewers on Election Night were simultaneously searching news websites &#8212; three times greater than the prior Tuesday night.</p>
<p>-On the other hand, 25.5% of news website visitors on Election Night were also watching TV election coverage &#8212; 2.5 times greater than the normal simultaneous traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/a-tale-of-two-media-internet-tv-news-on-election-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Madden&#8221; Video Games Take Marketing Into 21st Century</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/madden-video-games-take-marketing-into-21st-century/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/madden-video-games-take-marketing-into-21st-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EA Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video gaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=4242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 70 million copies sold &#8212; and counting, since its release in 1988, &#8220;Madden NFL Football&#8221; is the most popular sports video game of all time.
What&#8217;s driving the wild success of EA Sports&#8217; star product? 
A marketing vision that combines a deep understanding of the game&#8217;s core fan base with an innovative, &#8220;three-screen&#8221; strategy that leverages TV, online, and mobile phone outlets for the game, Matt Foran of Nielsen Sports, writes in the November issue of Nielsen’s &#8220;Consumer Insight&#8221; online newsletter.

Thanks to websites like Xbox Live, &#8220;Madden&#8221; gamers can head online ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ci_logo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4246" title="ci_logo" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ci_logo-300x104.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="52" /></a>At 70 million copies sold &#8212; and counting, since its release in 1988, &#8220;Madden NFL Football&#8221; is the most popular sports video game of all time.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s driving the wild success of EA Sports&#8217; star product? </p>
<p>A marketing vision that combines a deep understanding of the game&#8217;s core fan base with an innovative, &#8220;three-screen&#8221; strategy that leverages TV, online, and mobile phone outlets for the game, Matt Foran of Nielsen Sports, <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/issue_12/one_nation_under_madden" target="_blank">writes</a> in the November issue of Nielsen’s <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/issue_12/one_nation_under_madden" target="_blank">&#8220;Consumer Insight&#8221;</a> online newsletter.</p>
<p><span id="more-4242"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/madden.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4256" title="madden" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/madden.png" alt="" width="150" height="184" /></a>Thanks to websites like Xbox Live, &#8220;Madden&#8221; gamers can head online to play with friends and anonymous fans across the country &#8212; making the game a communal experience, Foran notes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Madden&#8221; is also one of the top ten mobile game downloads: 142,000 mobile users downloaded the game in July 2008, paying an average of $4.34 for the game, according to Nielsen’s latest Mobile Games Report. </p>
<p>Not surprisingly, the mobile version of &#8220;Madden NFL 2008&#8243; skews heavily male.  In Q2 2008, 78% of the game&#8217;s downloaders were male.  However, Foran notes, the game also skews more middle age than the overall mobile gaming population: 44% of &#8220;Madden NFL &#8216;08&#8243; downloaders were between the ages of 45 and 64.  In comparison, just 21% of the overall mobile gaming audience falls within that age group.</p>
<p>And because video gamers are <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/games_nflviewers.pdf">avid football fans</a> (in 2008, NFL games have drawn 44% higher TV ratings among households with video game consoles than those without, according to Nielsen), EA Sports expanded the &#8220;Madden&#8221; franchise into TV. </p>
<p>The company partnered with ESPN to create &#8220;Madden Nation,&#8221; a &#8220;Survivor&#8221;-esque reality show airing on ESPN2, Foran notes.  The show, which draws an average of 300,000 viewers each week, has come up with innovative ways to integrate cross promotions of NFL teams and sports apparel.</p>
<p>&#8220;Madden&#8221; has also found success with other ESPN programs, such as &#8220;Sunday Countdown&#8221; and &#8220;Monday Night Countdown,&#8221; Foran notes.  The programs regularly feature &#8220;EA Sports Virtual Playbook&#8221; segments, in which ESPN analysts diagram the plays using the &#8220;Madden&#8221; video game with super imposed graphics. </p>
<p>The takeaway for marketers?</p>
<p>Follow the &#8220;Madden&#8221; marketing team&#8217;s lead: a strong presence across multiple media platforms and a commitment to authenticity are essential for reaching increasingly empowered 21st Century consumers.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/consumer_insight/ci_story5.html" target="_blank">full article</a>.</p>
<p>View the <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/consumer_insight/index.html" target="_blank">latest issue</a> of &#8220;Consumer Insight.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/madden-video-games-take-marketing-into-21st-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Advertising Up Slightly In Q2 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/global-advertising-up-slightly-in-q2-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/global-advertising-up-slightly-in-q2-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global AdView Pulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising in Africa, Asia Pacific, Europe, and North America grew by 1.5%, year-over-year, in the second quarter of 2008, Nielsen reported Wednesday.
Strong advertising growth in the Asia-Pacific region (+7.6% over Q2 2007) drove the increase, according to data released in Nielsen&#8217;s latest Global AdView Pulse report.
Ad spending trends worldwide showed significant variations &#8212; with overall advertising declines recorded in North America (-1%) and Europe (-3%).

In North America, U.S. ad spending was down by approximately 6%, compared with the same period last year, while ad spending in Canada grew slightly (+1.7%).
In ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/upward_trend_chart.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2636" title="upward_trend_chart" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/upward_trend_chart-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>Advertising in Africa, Asia Pacific, Europe, and North America grew by 1.5%, year-over-year, in the second quarter of 2008, Nielsen reported Wednesday.</p>
<p>Strong advertising growth in the Asia-Pacific region (+7.6% over Q2 2007) drove the increase, according to data released in Nielsen&#8217;s latest Global AdView Pulse report.</p>
<p>Ad spending trends worldwide showed significant variations &#8212; with overall advertising declines recorded in North America (-1%) and Europe (-3%).</p>
<p><span id="more-2630"></span></p>
<p>In North America, U.S. ad spending was down by approximately 6%, compared with the same period last year, while ad spending in Canada grew slightly (+1.7%).</p>
<p>In Europe, the drop in ad spending affected all industry sectors and all media &#8212; except radio, which rose by almost 1% during the second quarter of this year.</p>
<p>In Asia Pacific, all four major media types (TV, magazines, newspapers, and radio) grew over Q2 2007, despite the detrimental effects of the May 2008 earthquake in China&#8217;s Sichuan Province, the Japanese recession, and general softening of the economy.  Of the twelve Asia-Pacific countries Nielsen tracks, only Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan showed declines in second quarter ad spending.</p>
<p>Globally, most industry sectors showed increased ad spending in Q2 2008, as compared with Q2 2007 spending.  The Automotive, Telecommunications, Financial, and Durables categories, which recorded decreased advertising investment in the second quarter of this year, were the only exceptions to that trend.</p>
<p>Among the mediums tracked by Nielsen &#8211; television, print, radio, outdoor, cinema, and Internet (where available) &#8212; TV showed growth (+3.8%), while all other media recorded ad spending declines.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s report is based on advertising data from 28 markets in Africa, Asia Pacific, Europe, and North America.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/press_release13.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/global-advertising-up-slightly-in-q2-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Growth, Despite Overall Ad Decline In Q1-Q2 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/some-growth-despite-overall-ad-decline-in-q1-q2-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/some-growth-despite-overall-ad-decline-in-q1-q2-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first half 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image-based online ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Monitor-Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online search advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q1 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q2 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. automotive industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising spending for the first half of 2008 declined by 1.4% compared to the same period last year, Nielsen Monitor-Plus reported Thursday.
Despite a continued softening of the economy, several media showed healthy growth in advertising for the first half.  Advertising on Cable TV (+8.1%), Syndication TV (+7.2%), and National Sunday Supplements (+7.2%) saw the largest growth, according to Nielsen.  Spot Radio fared worst among the 19 media categories analyzed by Nielsen (-10.1%). 
Although overall Internet ad spending, when including paid search and online video advertising, was up by 11% during the first half of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/down_trend_use-this-one.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1370" title="down_trend_use-this-one" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/down_trend_use-this-one-300x270.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="135" /></a>Advertising spending for the first half of 2008 declined by 1.4% compared to the same period last year, Nielsen Monitor-Plus <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/press_release7.pdf">reported</a> Thursday.</p>
<p>Despite a continued softening of the economy, several media showed healthy growth in advertising for the first half.  Advertising on Cable TV (+8.1%), Syndication TV (+7.2%), and National Sunday Supplements (+7.2%) saw the largest growth, according to Nielsen.  Spot Radio fared worst among the 19 media categories analyzed by Nielsen (-10.1%). </p>
<p>Although <a href="http://www.netratings.com/pr/pr_080918.pdf" target="_blank">overall Internet ad spending</a>, when including paid search and online video advertising, was up by 11% during the first half of this year, image-based Internet advertising declined by 6% during the first half of 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.</p>
<p><span id="more-1359"></span></p>
<p>Among specific product categories, Credit Card Services (+18.95%) and Direct Response Products (+20.48%) showed the strongest ad spending gains, while the Automotive (-.01%), Pharmaceutical (-4.76%), and Motion Picture (-4.64%) categories recorded the largest advertising declines.</p>
<p>The decrease in image-based Internet advertising was driven by a 27% drop in online ad spending by financial services companies, which decreased their spending from $1.5 billion in the first half of 2007 to $1.1 billion during the first two quarters of this year. </p>
<p>Other industries &#8212; entertainment (+47%), automotive (+45%), and consumer goods (+32%) &#8212; showed strong increases in image-based online advertising during the first half of 2008.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/press_release6.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>View Nielsen Online&#8217;s <a href="http://www.netratings.com/pr/pr_080918.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> on first half 2008 online ad spending.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/09/financial-secto.html" target="_blank">Wired</a>, <a href="http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081005/REG/310069964" target="_blank">Investment News</a>, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a5e4af8c-85e3-11dd-a1ac-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1" target="_blank">Financial Times</a>, <a href="http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080918/FREE/809189970/1064/toc" target="_blank">Crain&#8217;s New York Business</a>, <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/09/ad_spending_falls_14_through_j.php" target="_blank">TV Week</a>, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6597523.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Broadcasting &amp; Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=90978" target="_blank">MediaPost</a>, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i8fcb5100629836e66b11543dfb2089df" target="_blank">The Hollywood Reporter</a>, <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/client/e3ifefcf0cc1c7138b785e9264deef5d894" target="_blank">Adweek</a>, and <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/esearch/e3i90ecdc5551eec733d0a873c6481f994f" target="_blank">Mediaweek</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/some-growth-despite-overall-ad-decline-in-q1-q2-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
