<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; TV viewing trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/tv-viewing-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Technology Expands, But TV Continues To Rule</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/technology-expands-but-tv-continues-to-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/technology-expands-but-tv-continues-to-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the proliferation of mobile devices and online video, television continues to capture the most viewers, according to recent Nielsen research.  But how people are watching television has evolved and it is these advances that have made TV more relevant than ever.  They aren&#8217;t necessarily &#8220;watching TV&#8221; on TV &#8211; they are increasingly likely to watch TV programs on the Internet or on their cell phones, according to an article in the The New York Times.
The average U.S. household has 2.7 people and 2.9 TVs.  For the quarter ended September ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/tv.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8073" title="tv" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/tv-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Despite the proliferation of mobile devices and online video, television continues to capture the most viewers, according to recent <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-high-tv-use-despite-onlinemobile-video-gains/">Nielsen research</a>.  But how people are watching television has evolved and it is these advances that have made TV more relevant than ever.  They aren&#8217;t necessarily &#8220;watching TV&#8221; on TV &#8211; they are increasingly likely to watch TV programs on the Internet or on their cell phones, according to an article in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/business/media/08digi.html?scp=6%26sq=nielsen%26st=cse">The New York Times</a>.</p>
<p>The average U.S. household has 2.7 people and 2.9 TVs.  For the quarter ended September 2008, the average American watched 142 hours of TV per month, an increase of five hours from the same period in 2007.  Average Internet usage also increased, to an average of 27 hours per month.</p>
<p>So how has TV managed to maintain its lead? The variety of channels available on cable and satellite is clearly one factor.  There&#8217;s a network for virtually every interest.  Second, programming produced for TV is driving growth in other channels like the Internet and mobile.  The ability to download TV shows from iTunes or stream from Hulu.com or TV network site has enabled fans to watch their favorite programs when and where they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/technology-expands-but-tv-continues-to-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In U.S., Hi-Def TV Household Penetration Tops 23%</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/in-us-hi-def-tv-penetration-tops-23/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/in-us-hi-def-tv-penetration-tops-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-definition TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost one-quarter of all U.S. television households (23.3%) own a high definition TV set as of Nov. 30, Nielsen reported Thursday.
Nielsen&#8217;s estimates are based on a field staff review that identified TV sets capable of receiving and displaying high definition pictures, as well as those that are actually receiving those signals.
High definition TV penetration in the U.S. has more than doubled since July 2007, when Nielsen began tracking HDTV status.  At that time, only 10% of U.S. homes had access to high definition TV.



Month/Year
% of U.S. Households
With HDTV


November 2008
23.3%


October 2008
22.2%


September 2008
21.3%


August ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sports_tv2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5591" title="sports_tv2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sports_tv2-193x300.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="150" /></a>Almost one-quarter of all U.S. television households (23.3%) own a high definition TV set as of Nov. 30, Nielsen <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hdtv-december-2008-final1.pdf">reported</a> Thursday.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s estimates are based on a field staff review that identified TV sets capable of receiving and displaying high definition pictures, as well as those that are actually receiving those signals.</p>
<p>High definition TV penetration in the U.S. has more than doubled since July 2007, when Nielsen began tracking HDTV status.  At that time, only 10% of U.S. homes had access to high definition TV.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Month/Year</th>
<th>% of U.S. Households<br />
With HDTV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">November 2008</td>
<td>23.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">October 2008</td>
<td>22.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">September 2008</td>
<td>21.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">August 2008</td>
<td>20.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">July 2008</td>
<td>19.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">June 2008</td>
<td>18.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">May 2008</td>
<td>18.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">April 2008</td>
<td>17.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">March 2008</td>
<td>16.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">February 2008</td>
<td>15.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">January 2008</td>
<td>14.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">December 2007</td>
<td>13.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">November 2007</td>
<td>12.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">October 2007</td>
<td>12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">September 2007</td>
<td>11.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">August 2007</td>
<td>10.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">July 2007</td>
<td>10.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (July 1, 2007 &#8211; November 30, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-5590"></span></p>
<p>Washington, D.C., where 31.1% of homes are HDTV-enabled, has the highest HDTV penetration of Nielsen&#8217;s 18 largest local TV markets.  Boston and New York follow, with HDTV penetrations of 30.5% and 30.2%, respectively.  Detroit has the lowest HDTV penetration: 20.9% of homes.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 18<br />
Nielsen Local TV<br />
Markets</th>
<th>% Households In Market<br />
With HDTV<br />
(November 2008)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Washington, DC (Hagerstown)</td>
<td>31.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Boston (Manchester)</td>
<td>30.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">New York</td>
<td>30.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Seattle-Tacoma</td>
<td>29.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Philadelphia</td>
<td>29.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Los Angeles</td>
<td>28.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Chicago</td>
<td>27.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Phoenix</td>
<td>26.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">San Francisco-Oak-San Jose</td>
<td>26.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota)</td>
<td>26.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Denver</td>
<td>26.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Atlanta</td>
<td>25.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Dallas-Ft. Worth</td>
<td>25.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Houston</td>
<td>23.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cleveland &#8211; Akron</td>
<td>23.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Minneapolis &#8211; St. Paul</td>
<td>21.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Miami-Ft. Lauderdale</td>
<td>21.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Detroit</td>
<td>20.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>Total U.S.</strong></td>
<td><strong>23.3%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (November 30, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Sporting events have the highest index of viewing in HDTV households, with HDTV receivable and capable homes watching 54% more sports than households that are not HDTV capable.  Political programming and awards shows are also popular with HDTV households.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hdtv-december-2008-final.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings on <a href="http://www.contentinople.com/author.asp?section_id=450&amp;doc_id=169221" target="_blank">Contentinople.com</a> and in <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6621801.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Broadcasting &amp; Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6621890.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Multichannel News</a>, and <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/index.cfm?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=96533" target="_blank">Media Post</a>,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/in-us-hi-def-tv-penetration-tops-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has The Tough Economy Changed Americans&#8217; TV Habits?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/has-the-tough-economy-changed-americans-tv-habits/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/has-the-tough-economy-changed-americans-tv-habits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast only sevice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eocnomic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial news programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=3259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ongoing financial crisis has had far-reaching effects in the U.S., where it has taken a toll on everything from Americans&#8217; shopping habits to their retirement savings.
Could the dire economic conditions also be changing the way Americans watch TV?
Yes and no, according to a Nielsen report released Friday, which found that Americans are watching more cable news this year than they did last year. Between September 15, 2008 and October 19, 2008, tuning to cable news networks almost doubled, versus the same period last year, according to Nielsen.

U.S. homes with the highest household incomes ($100,000+/year) &#8212; who likely have the largest ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dollar_in_vice_grip1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3262" title="dollar_in_vice_grip1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dollar_in_vice_grip1-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>The ongoing financial crisis has had far-reaching effects in the U.S., where it has taken a toll on everything from Americans&#8217; <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-shoppers-adapt-to-higher-gas-commodities-costs/" target="_blank">shopping habits</a> to their <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/despite-market-turmoil-americans-still-trust-their-banks/" target="_blank">retirement savings</a>.</p>
<p>Could the dire economic conditions also be changing the way Americans watch TV?</p>
<p>Yes and no, according to a Nielsen <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/final_report1.pdf">report</a> released Friday, which found that Americans are watching more cable news this year than they did last year. Between September 15, 2008 and October 19, 2008, tuning to cable news networks almost doubled, versus the same period last year, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p><span id="more-3259"></span></p>
<p>U.S. homes with the highest household incomes ($100,000+/year) &#8212; who likely have the largest investments &#8212; showed the greatest percentage growth in cable news viewership over last year (+125%).  Among households with the lowest annual incomes (less than $20,000), cable news viewership in September and October showed the smallest growth from the same period in 2007 (+38%).</p>
<p>A caveat: the presidential race is likely drawing more cable news tuning in 2008.  As such, growth in cable news tuning cannot be attributed solely to viewers&#8217; interest in the economic crisis.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Population Segment<br />
(by annual household income)</th>
<th>Household Ratings:<br />
Cable News Networks*<br />
(Sept. 17 &#8211; Oct. 21, 2007)</th>
<th>Household Ratings:<br />
Cable News Networks*<br />
Sept. 15 &#8211; Oct. 19, 2008</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">All Households</td>
<td>1.5</td>
<td>2.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income &lt; $20,000</td>
<td>1.3</td>
<td>1.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income $20-40k</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income $40-60k</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income = $60,000-74,999</td>
<td>1.5</td>
<td>3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income = $75,000-99,999</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>3.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income = $100,000+</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (Sept. 17 &#8211; Oct. 21, 2007 and Sept. 15 &#8211; Oct. 19, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: Sources include CNBC, CNN, Fox News Channel, Headline News, and MSNBC. Daypart is Monday &#8211; Sunday, 6am-6am.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Meanwhile, despite shrinking household budgets and widespread <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-consumers-curtail-2008-holiday-spending/" target="_blank">belt-tightening</a>, Americans are not downgrading from cable and satellite TV plans to less expensive broadcast only TV service.</p>
<p>As of September, 1.4% of homes that received cable or satellite service in September 2007 had downgraded to broadcast only service.  That percentage of down-graders remains unchanged from last year, when the U.S. economy was still relatively healthy.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/final_report.pdf">report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/has-the-tough-economy-changed-americans-tv-habits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hockey Moms&#8221; Tune In For Prez, V.P. Debates</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/hockey-moms-tune-in-for-prez-vp-debates/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/hockey-moms-tune-in-for-prez-vp-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v.p. debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women 25-54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women viewers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; famously invoked by Gov. Sarah Palin in her V.P. campaign speeches &#8212; may also have a passion for politics.
According to a Nielsen analysis released Tuesday, &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; defined as women ages 25 to 54 who live in homes with children and who watched at least six minutes of the most recent Stanley Cup Finals on NBC &#8211; were more likely than average moms to watch the first two debates of the 2008 election.
Last Thursday, Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s V.P. debate drew 23.8% of all mothers (ages ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button6.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2133" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button6-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>&#8220;Hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; famously invoked by Gov. Sarah Palin in her V.P. campaign speeches &#8212; may also have a passion for politics.</p>
<p>According to a Nielsen analysis released Tuesday, &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; defined as women ages 25 to 54 who live in homes with children and who watched at least six minutes of the most recent Stanley Cup Finals on NBC &#8211; were more likely than average moms to watch the first two debates of the 2008 election.</p>
<p>Last Thursday, Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s V.P. debate drew 23.8% of all mothers (ages 25 to 54), while 33% of those women defined as &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; tuned in.  Overall, &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; were 38.7% more likely than average moms to have watched the V.P. debate.</p>
<p>In comparison, the first debate between Senators McCain and Obama, on Sept. 26, drew 16.5% of all mothers (25 to 54).  Among those classified as &#8220;hockey moms,&#8221; however, 21.3% tuned in to the debate, making &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; 29.1% more likely than average moms to have watched the McCain and Obama&#8217;s debate.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in the <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/jobfind/news/media/view/2008_10_07_Hockey_moms_tuning_in_to_debates/srvc=home&amp;position=also" target="_blank">Boston Herald</a> and <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6602527.html" target="_blank">Broadcasting &amp; Cable</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/hockey-moms-tune-in-for-prez-vp-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
