<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; tv ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/tv-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Relationship Between Social Media Buzz and TV Ratings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-relationship-between-social-media-buzz-and-tv-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-relationship-between-social-media-buzz-and-tv-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As television becomes more digital social media will continue to play an increasingly important role in how consumers discover and engage with various forms of content, including TV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Radha Subramanyam, SVP of Media Analytics</strong></em></p>
<p>People aren&#8217;t just consuming content on social networks, they&#8217;re actively sharing it.  As television becomes more digital &#8211; in the form of sharable video clips or articles about a show&#8217;s premiere, for example &#8211; social media will continue to play an increasingly important role in how consumers discover and engage with various forms of content, including TV.</p>
<p>An analysis conducted by NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey Company, and Nielsen looked at the correlation between online buzz and television ratings and found a statistically significant relationship throughout a TV show&#8217;s season among all age groups, with the strongest correlation among younger demos (people ages 12-17 and 18-34), and a slightly stronger overall correlation for women compared to men.  Men over 50 showed the weakest buzz-to-ratings connection leading up to a show&#8217;s premiere through the middle of the season, but that relationship strengthened by the finale as all age groups were actively discussing a TV show via social media.</p>
<p>Among  people aged 18-34, the most active social networkers, social media buzz is most  closely aligned with TV ratings for the premiere of a show.  A few weeks prior  to a show’s premiere, a nine percent increase in buzz volume correlates to a one  percent increase in ratings among this group.  As the middle of the season  approaches and then the finale, the correlation is slightly weaker, but still  significant, with a 14 percent increase in buzz corresponding to a one percent  increase in ratings.</p>
<p>At the genre level, 18-34 year-old females showed significant buzz-to-ratings relationships for reality programs (competition and non-competition), comedies and dramas, while men of the same age saw strong correlations for competition realities and dramas.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29290" title="buzz-impact-tv-ratings" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/buzz-impact-tv-ratings.gif" alt="buzz-impact-tv-ratings" width="575" height="450" /><br />
</em></span></p>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong></p>
<p>A model was created using 250 television programs and over 150 million social media sites to analyze the relationship between social media and television.  Several buzz- and television-related inputs went into this model.  Buzz metrics included buzz volume (the raw number of messages about a TV show), messages per source (as a proxy for spread of discussion) and the number of authors (total number of individuals generating the messages).  Fundamental television factors included the genre of the show, whether the program aired on broadcast or cable, and the length of time the show had been on-air (first season, second, etc.).  The amount of ad dollars  spent promoting the show and prior ratings (both episode and season) were also considered.</p>
<p>These variables directly impact both ratings and  buzz volume.  They were included in the model to account for  their contribution to understanding future TV ratings, and to bring clarity  to the value that buzz provides.</p>
<p>For more on TV viewers getting social, download research and watch video from <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/adweek2011">Nielsen&#8217;s Advertising Week</a> presentations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-relationship-between-social-media-buzz-and-tv-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl XLV Most Viewed Telecast in U.S. Broadcast History</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, making it the most watched television program of all time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, surpassing last year’s Super Bowl, and thereby breaking the record, yet again, for the most watched television program of all time in the U.S.  The game was viewed in 53.3 million households, with a preliminary 46.0 U.S. household rating.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Most Watched  Telecasts of All Time (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Avg. # of Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLV</td>
<td>February 6, 2011</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>111,010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td>February 7, 2010</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>106,476</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>M*A*S*H Special</td>
<td>February 28, 1983</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>105,970</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIII</td>
<td>February 1, 2009</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>98,732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLII</td>
<td>February 3, 2008</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>97,448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XXX</td>
<td>January 28, 1996</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>94,076</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>“Super Bowl XLV caps what is arguably the most successful season that any sports league has ever had,” said Pat McDonough,   “The number of people watching NFL games has never been higher, with 24% more people watching the average NFL game this year than just five years ago.  The Super Bowl continues to be in a category of its own, with an appeal that transcends sports and extends even to the commercials.  Because of the cliff-hanger nature of the game, viewers were tuning in until the very end, driving viewing levels to new heights.”</p>
<p>Over the past several years, the NFL has attracted larger audiences by <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/">broadening its appeal to new audiences</a>, including women and Hispanics, by building up high-profile players – especially quarterbacks – to personify the league and by cross-promoting the games across multiple television networks and emerging digital platforms.</p>
<p><strong>Pittsburgh and Milwaukee Lead Local Market viewing</strong><br />
In the local markets, Milwaukee and Pittsburgh were tied, with a 59.7 household rating.  Other high local market ratings include Columbus, OH and Nashville.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top Five Local Markets, Super Bowl XLV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Share</th>
<th>Households (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>87</td>
<td>693</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Milwaukee</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>538</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Columbus, OH</td>
<td>56.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>515</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>564</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>76</td>
<td>388</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Top 10s and Trends for 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-top-10s-and-trends-for-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-top-10s-and-trends-for-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company released a list of the most popular media and consumer spending trends in the U.S. for 2010, covering everything from the most popular television shows, to the most liked commercials, book sales, purchasing trends, top mobile apps and more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company released a list of the most popular media and consumer spending trends in the U.S. for 2010, covering everything from the most popular television shows, to the most liked commercials, book sales, purchasing trends, top mobile apps and more.</p>
<p>Download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Nielsen-Top-10s-2010.pdf">Nielsen&#8217;s top 10s and trends in the U.S. for 2010</a>.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0" width="100%">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Top 10 TV Programs – Single Telecast</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Telecast</th>
<th>Originator</th>
<th>Date Aired</th>
<th>Total Persons Rating</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>36.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Super   Bowl XLIV Post Game</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>25.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Super   Bowl Kick-Off</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>FOX   NFC Championship</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/24/10</td>
<td>19.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>AFC   Championship on CBS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>1/24/10</td>
<td>16.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Academy Awards</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>3/7/10</td>
<td>14.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Undercover Boss</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>13.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>FOX NFC Playoff-Sun</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/17/10</td>
<td>12.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>AFC Divisional Playoff-Sun</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>1/17/10</td>
<td>12.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>FOX NFC Wildcard Game</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/10/10</td>
<td>11.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
*Top Telecasts: Note: Data from January 1, 2010 – November 28, 2010. Persons 2+ Ratings include Live and Same Day timeshifted viewing. Excludes telecasts under 5 minutes.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0" width="100%">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Top 10 TV Programs – Regularly Scheduled</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Originator</th>
<th>Total Persons Rating</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>American Idol -Tuesday</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>7.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>American Idol -Wednesday</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>7.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Dancing with the Stars</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>7.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>NBC Sunday Night Football</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>7.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Dancing w/Stars Results</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>5.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Sunday Night NFL Pre-Kick</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>5.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>NCIS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>5.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>NFL Regular Season L</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>4.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Survivor: Heroes-Villains</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>NCIS: Los Angeles</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>4.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Two and a Half Men</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>4.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
*Top Primetime programs: Note Data from January 1, 2010 – November 28, 2010, regularly scheduled programs. Persons 2+ Ratings include Live and Same Day timeshifted viewing. Excludes programs with less than 4 telecasts and programs under 5 minutes.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-top-10s-and-trends-for-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cowboys Tackle Top Spot in NFL Media Exposure Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Sports Media Scorecard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index, the Cowboys were still the most popular NFL team in America last season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as much of the country rallied around the Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints last year, it seems that the Dallas Cowboys are still America&#8217;s team.</p>
<p>According to The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index, which measures media exposure on TV and online, the Cowboys were still the most popular NFL team in America last season. Jerry Jones&#8217;s franchise earned the top indexed score of 100, far surpassing the runner-up Pittsburgh Steelers who finished with an index of 81.</p>
<p>The Cowboys&#8217; top ranking was boosted by first-place showings in two of the four categories tallied by Nielsen: gross audience during nationally televised games and monthly unique audience to the team web site. The other two categories &#8211; local team ratings and total buzz volume &#8211; were captured by the Saints and New York Giants, respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="7">NIELSEN&#8217;S NFL MEDIA EXPOSURE RANKINGS</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>TEAM</th>
<th>LOCAL TV RANK</th>
<th>NATIONAL TV RANK</th>
<th>WEBSITE/UNIQUE AUDIENCE RANK</th>
<th>ONLINE BUZZ VOLUME RANK</th>
<th>OVERALL INDEX</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td><strong>Dallas Cowboys</strong></td>
<td>8</td>
<td><em>1</em></td>
<td><em>1</em></td>
<td>2</td>
<td><strong>100</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>2</strong></td>
<td><strong>Pittsburgh Steelers</strong></td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>8</td>
<td><strong>81</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>3</strong></td>
<td><strong>New York Giants</strong></td>
<td>30</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>1</td>
<td><strong>70</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Chicago Bears</strong></td>
<td>16</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>3</td>
<td><em>5</em></td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Green Bay Packers</strong></td>
<td>5</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>11</td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Minnesota Vikings</strong></td>
<td>4</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>12</td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>7 </strong></td>
<td><strong>Philadelphia Eagles</strong></td>
<td>12</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>6</td>
<td><strong>66</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>8 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Indianapolis Colts</strong></td>
<td><em>6</em></td>
<td>7</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>14</td>
<td><strong>62</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>8 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>New Orleans Saints</strong></td>
<td>1</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>10</td>
<td><strong>62</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>10</strong></td>
<td><strong>New England Patriots</strong></td>
<td>14</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>13</td>
<td><strong>58</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="7">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Note: Time period of data reflects the 2009-10 NFL regular season</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Dallas has held the top two spots in each of the last two years. The Steelers moved up from third to second, swapping places with the Giants. The Minnesota Vikings, aided no doubt by the presence and performance of legendary QB Brett Favre,  climbed from 13th place in 2008 to a tie for 4th in the 2009 regular season ranking. The Washington Redskins, meanwhile, dropped from 5th in 2008 to 11th in 2009.</p>
<p>NFC teams dominated the 2009 rankings. Seven of the top 10 teams  represented the conference, while the Steelers, Colts (t-8th) and Patriots (10th) were the only three AFC teams to crack the top third of the list.</p>
<p>Among the two New York teams, the Giants had the most media exposure, ranking 15 spots ahead of the Jets. And even despite drawing 38% lower local market ratings than their Bay Area rivals, the Oakland Raiders were the most popular national brand out of Northern California, ranking two spots ahead of the San Francisco 49ers (25th vs. 27th).</p>
<p>The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index measured all 32 NFL teams in four categories during the 2009 regular season: local team ratings, gross national TV audience, online buzz volume, and monthly unique audiences to official team websites. Teams in each category were assigned a score, with the top rank worth 100 points and each subsequent ranking assigned a lower weighted score based its distance from the top. Final team rankings were calculated using the sum of scores across all four categories, and then indexed with the highest total equaling 100.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s NFL Media Exposure Index was recently featured in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703453804575479961782758620.html" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40% of New U.S. TV Homes this Season will be Hispanic Households</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/40-of-new-u-s-tv-homes-this-season-will-be-hispanic-households/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/40-of-new-u-s-tv-homes-this-season-will-be-hispanic-households/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spanish-language TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen estimates another large increase of Hispanic TV homes for the 2010-2011 TV season. The estimated 3.07 percent increase for Hispanic homes outpaces the overall 0.87 percent gain in TV homes estimated for the upcoming season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen estimates another large increase (nearly 400,000 homes) for Hispanic TV homes in the 2010-2011 television season. The estimated 3.07 percent increase for Hispanic homes outpaces the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/number-of-u-s-tv-households-climbs-by-one-million-for-2010-11-tv-season/">total 0.87 percent gain</a> (or 1 million homes) for the upcoming season. Last season, Hispanic homes posted a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/hispanic-homes-in-u-s-show-largest-growth-for-2009-2010-tv-season/">2.30 percent gain</a>. A modest increase in TV households is also expected among the African American households and Asian households.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Total U.S. Television Household Estimates by Race and Ethnicity: 2010 and 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> TV Households</th>
<th> 2009-10</th>
<th> 2010-11</th>
<th> Relative Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Total</td>
<td>114,900,000</td>
<td>115,900,000</td>
<td>0.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hispanic</td>
<td>12,950,510</td>
<td>13,348,190</td>
<td>3.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">African-American</td>
<td>13,997,990</td>
<td>14,072,950</td>
<td>0.54%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Asian</td>
<td>4,782,560</td>
<td>4,812,310</td>
<td>0.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Overall, there were more rank changes this season in local markets compared to the previous season.   Among the top 50 Hispanic markets, 22 markets changed rank this year, compared to only six changes last year. Philadelphia had the largest increase, rising 8 percent from last year, followed by Kansas City (up 7.7 percent).  In the top 50 African American markets, Kansas City had the largest percentage increase, up 4.7 percent from last year.  And in the top 50 Asian markets, Austin increased 3.7 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/40-of-new-u-s-tv-homes-this-season-will-be-hispanic-households/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 World Cup Reaches Nearly 112 Million U.S. Viewers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/2010-world-cup-reaches-nearly-112-million-u-s-viewers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/2010-world-cup-reaches-nearly-112-million-u-s-viewers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An estimated 111.6 million U.S. viewers watched at least six minutes of the 2010 World Cup on English or Spanish language networks, according to an analysis by The Nielsen Company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An estimated 111.6 million U.S. viewers watched at least six minutes of the 2010 World Cup on English or Spanish language networks, according to an analysis by The Nielsen Company. The figure is a 22% increase from the reach of 91.4 million U.S. viewers during the 2006 World Cup.</p>
<p>Earlier this month, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/world-cup-reaches-one-third-of-all-u-s-tv-viewers/">Nielsen estimated the World Cup reach at 99.2 million viewers through the Round of 16</a>. Since then, the advanced stages of the World Cup picked up an extra 12.4 million viewers. All told, 38% of U.S. viewers &#8211; and 50% of all U.S. households &#8211; tuned in for at least six minutes of this year&#8217;s tournament.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s research also found that 57% of the total audience reached by World Cup telecasts was male and 43% was female. Almost half (49%) of the total audience fell between the ages of 18 and 49.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/2010-world-cup-reaches-nearly-112-million-u-s-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Cup Reaches One-Third of All U.S. TV Viewers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/world-cup-reaches-one-third-of-all-u-s-tv-viewers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/world-cup-reaches-one-third-of-all-u-s-tv-viewers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local sport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A total of 99.2 million U.S. viewers have watched at least six minutes of World Cup action through Tuesday. The figure already surpasses the 91.4 million viewers who watched at least some of the games throughout the entire 2006 World Cup.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>World Cup soccer telecasts aired on all English and Spanish language networks have reached an estimated 34% of all U.S. TV viewers, according to figures released today by The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>A total of 99.2 million U.S. viewers have watched at least six minutes of World Cup action through Tuesday. The figure already surpasses the 91.4 million viewers who watched at least some of the games throughout the <em>entire</em> 2006 World Cup.</p>
<p>&#8220;The audience reach measurement is a good indicator of how many viewers are at least curious enough to see what all the buzz is about,&#8221; said Stephen Master, VP of sports at Nielsen. &#8220;Even with the World Cup&#8217;s most crucial games still to come, a reach of 99.2 million viewers suggests that there&#8217;s a big American appetite for world class soccer.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Miami Dominates Local Rankings</strong></p>
<p>Viewers in the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale market are watching the World Cup more than any other market in the country. Through Tuesday, Miami has the highest ratings for both English language (3.6 HH rating) and Spanish language (5.2 HH rating) World Cup telecasts.</p>
<p>New York City has the second highest ratings for English language telecasts (3.3 HH rating), followed by Washington, DC (3.2 HH rating). San Diego, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/world-cup-revisited-120-million-u-s-viewers-in-2006/">which was the top rated English language market in 2006</a>, ranks fouth so far this year with a 3.1 average household rating.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">2010 World Cup Local Market Rankings &#8211; English Language</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Share</th>
<th>Households (000)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Miami-Ft. Lauderdale</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>New York</td>
<td>3.3</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>245</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Washington, DC (Hagerstown)</td>
<td>3.2</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>San Diego</td>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose</td>
<td>3.0</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Norfolk-Portsmth-Newport News</td>
<td>2.9</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Las Vegas</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Boston (Manchester)</td>
<td>2.6</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Baltimore</td>
<td>2.4</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">
<p style="text-align: left;">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Includes broadcasts airing on ABC, ESPN, and ESPN2 through 6/29/10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>After Miami, Los Angeles has the highest average rating for Spanish language broadcasts (4.1 HH rating). Houston (3.5), Las Vegas (2.6), and Dallas-Ft. Worth (2.4) round out the top five.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">2010 World Cup Local Market Rankings &#8211; Spanish Language</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Share</th>
<th>Households (000)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Miami-Ft. Lauderdale</td>
<td>5.2</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Los Angeles</td>
<td>4.1</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>231</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Houston</td>
<td>3.5</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Las Vegas</td>
<td>2.6</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Dallas-Ft. Worth</td>
<td>2.4</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>San Antonio</td>
<td>2.1</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>New York</td>
<td>2.0</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>San Francisco-Oak-San Jose</td>
<td>1.9</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto</td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Austin</td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Includes broadcasts airing on Univision and Telefutura through 6/29/10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/world-cup-reaches-one-third-of-all-u-s-tv-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA-Ghana Match Draws Highest U.S. Soccer Audience Ever</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-ghana-match-draws-highest-u-s-soccer-audience-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-ghana-match-draws-highest-u-s-soccer-audience-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An estimated 19.4 million U.S. viewers watched USA's loss to Ghana on Saturday, making it the most watched soccer game ever in the U.S., according to data from The Nielsen Company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An estimated 19.4 million U.S. viewers watched USA&#8217;s loss to Ghana on Saturday, making it the most watched soccer game ever in the U.S., according to data from The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>The record viewership, which includes audiences watching on ABC and Univision, surpassed the previous high of 18.1 million viewers who watched the 1994 World Cup final between Brazil and Italy.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Most Watched Soccer Games in the U.S.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Game</th>
<th>Network(s)</th>
<th>Viewers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>6/26/2010</td>
<td>USA-Ghana</td>
<td>ABC/Univision</td>
<td>19.4 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>7/17/1994</td>
<td>Brazil-Italy</td>
<td>ABC/Univision</td>
<td>18.1 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>7/10/1999</td>
<td>USA-China (women)</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>18.0 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>6/12/2010</td>
<td>USA-England</td>
<td>ABC/Univision</td>
<td>17.1 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>7/09/2006</td>
<td>Italy-France</td>
<td>ABC/Univision</td>
<td>17.0 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#8220;This record viewership proves that soccer is as popular as it&#8217;s ever been in the United States,&#8221; said Stephen Master, VP of sports at The Nielsen Company. &#8220;Between the rise of social networking and virtually unlimited access to the sport no matter where it&#8217;s played in the world, this is the perfect environment for the game of soccer to thrive in the U.S.&#8221;</p>
<p>For greater context on the significance of 19.4 million viewers, viewership for other recent major sports events in the U.S. include:</p>
<ul>
<li>2009 World Series: 19.1 million (average per game)</li>
<li>2010 NBA Finals: 18.1 million (average per game)</li>
<li>2010 final round of the Masters: 16.7 million</li>
<li>2010 Kentucky Derby: 16.5 million</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-ghana-match-draws-highest-u-s-soccer-audience-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Ratings Climb 68% for 2010 World Cup</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-ratings-up-big-in-2010-world-cup/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-ratings-up-big-in-2010-world-cup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The average American TV audience for games played by Team USA are up 68% in 2010 compared to the 2006 World Cup, according to an analysis released this afternoon by The Nielsen Company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average American TV audience for the first three games played by Team USA are up 68% in 2010 compared to the same point during the 2006 World Cup, according to an analysis released this afternoon by The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>An average of 11.1 million viewers caught the English and Spanish language broadcasts for each of USA&#8217;s three Group C matchups in this year&#8217;s World Cup. In 2006, USA&#8217;s three group stage games averaged 6.6 million viewers.</p>
<p>&#8220;These ratings demonstrate the remarkable increase of interest in U.S. soccer over the last four years,&#8221; said Stephen Master, VP of sports at Nielsen. &#8220;The numbers are even more impressive when you consider that two of these games were played on weekday mornings, when many viewers are at work. Although more people than ever chose to watch live streaming video of the games from their computers and mobile devices, TV viewing climbed even higher.&#8221;</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Average U.S. Viewership for USA World Cup Matches, 2010</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Game</th>
<th>Networks</th>
<th>Viewers (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6/12/2010</td>
<td>USA-England</td>
<td>ABC/Univision</td>
<td>17.1 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6/18/2010</td>
<td>USA-Slovenia</td>
<td>ESPN/Univision</td>
<td>7.5 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6/23/2010</td>
<td>USA-Algeria</td>
<td>ESPN/Univision</td>
<td>8.6 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis" colspan="3">Average</td>
<td>11.1 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">
<p style="text-align: left;">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Note: Viewership data based on the approximate two-hour in-game window</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Average U.S. Viewership for USA World Cup Matches, 2006</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Game</th>
<th>Networks</th>
<th>Viewers (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6/12/2006</td>
<td>USA-Czech Republic</td>
<td>ESPN2/Univision</td>
<td>4.7 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6/17/2006</td>
<td>USA-Italy</td>
<td>ABC/Univision</td>
<td>9.8 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6/22/2006</td>
<td>USA-Ghana</td>
<td>ESPN/Univision</td>
<td>5.5 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis" colspan="3">Average</td>
<td>6.6 million</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">
<p style="text-align: left;">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Note: Viewership data based program timeslots, which may include pre-game coverage</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Yesterday&#8217;s dramatic USA-Algeria matchup drew an estimated 8.6 million viewers between ESPN and Univision, making it the second most watched U.S. game behind USA-England. The game&#8217;s viewership was up from the 7.5 million viewers who watched USA tie Slovenia last Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-ratings-up-big-in-2010-world-cup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA-England Draws 14.5 Million Total U.S. Viewers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-england-draws-14-5-million-total-u-s-viewers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-england-draws-14-5-million-total-u-s-viewers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saturday's USA-England game might have ended in a draw, but the game's telecasts were the clear winners.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday&#8217;s USA-England game might have ended in a draw, but the game&#8217;s telecasts were the clear winners.</p>
<p>An estimated 14.5 million U.S. viewers combined to watch the telecasts on ABC and Univision (which include pre-game coverage), the highest average audience for a men&#8217;s national team soccer game since at least 15.8 million combined to watch USA and Brazil&#8217;s Round of 16 match in 1994.</p>
<p>The game was also the most watched first round game in the U.S., surpassing the USA-Romania match that drew at least 12.1 million in 1994.</p>
<p>“Thanks to social media and enhanced access to games and news from around the world, soccer fever has hit a critical mass in the United States,” said Stephen Master, vice president of sports at The Nielsen Company. “Saturday’s viewership numbers only validate soccer’s momentum across America.”</p>
<p>A further breakdown of the of the game&#8217;s audience reveals that 57% of total viewers fell in the 18-49 demographic. An estimated 65% of adults 18+ were male, while 35% were female. Teens accounted for almost 7% of the total audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/usa-england-draws-14-5-million-total-u-s-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

