<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; TV advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/tv-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Year in Sports Advertising: TV Ad Spend Grows to $10.9B</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National TV sports advertising generated $10.9 billion in revenue last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National TV sports generated $10.9 billion in advertising expenditure last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>. Measuring ad spend during sporting events on network and cable TV from Q4 2010 through Q3 2011, Nielsen also saw that cable has an increasing share of those ad dollars—growing 37.3 percent year over year compared to 5.9 percent for sports ad spending in general.</p>
<p>TV sports advertising is dominated by a few big spenders, with the top 10 — led by AT&amp;T, Bud Light, Verizon Wireless, McDonald’s and DIRECTV—accounting for roughly a quarter (26%) of the total spend during that time period.</p>
<p>The increase in TV ad spend mirrors a similar increase in the amount of live TV sports content available on TV and cable. There were more than 42,500 hours of live sporting events on national broadcast and cable TV in 2011, a five percent increase over 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30730  aligncenter" title="year-in-sports-ads" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png" alt="year-in-sports-ads" width="500" height="824" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>For more insights on sports and media, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Mainstream: 28% of TV Watching Spent on LGBT-Inclusive Shows</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/the-new-mainstream-28-of-tv-watching-spent-on-lgbt-inclusive-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/the-new-mainstream-28-of-tv-watching-spent-on-lgbt-inclusive-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Audiences and advertisers alike are flocking to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT)-inclusive programs. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Audiences and advertisers alike are flocking to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT)-inclusive programs. Representing 24 percent of broadcast primetime scripted and reality shows last season, these series garnered 28 percent of broadcast primetime TV viewing and 22 percent of ad dollars, according to Nielsen data. According to the Gay &amp; Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), the presence of regularly-appearing LGBT characters accounted for 3.9 percent of all scripted series regular characters during the 2010-2011 season, reaching a record high.</p>
<p><strong>Scripted Shows for Teens, Realities for Older Females</strong><br />
Teen and Millennial viewers in particular dedicated over a third of their primetime scripted TV viewing to series depicting at least one regular or recurring LGBT character.* Females 50 and older were attracted to realities featuring LGBT cast-members, hosts, judges and/or competitors, dedicating a significant share of their reality TV time to these programs.* Overall, one in four scripted series and one in five reality shows were LGBT-inclusive.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">“The inclusion of LGBT characters on TV more accurately portrays the diverse and multicultural society we live in by encompassing all segments of the population,&#8221; said Matt O’Grady, EVP, Audience Measurement, Nielsen.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-2.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29714  aligncenter" title="LGBT-Inclusive Programs Share" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-2.png" alt="LGBT-Inclusive Programs Share" width="513" height="606" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>LGBT-Inclusive Shows Attract Dynamic Audiences</strong><br />
Audiences for LGBT-inclusive shows were as diverse as the programs themselves, though certain demographics appear to have been more exposed to LGBT images. Within the 25-49 age demographic, LGBT-inclusive programs (and its advertisers) were most likely to reach:</p>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>College-educated white females</li>
<li>Small white collar households</li>
<li>Budding families (those with 3 or fewer      members)</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">Non-white, professional Millennials without children also tended to watch LGBT-inclusive shows more frequently than primetime in general.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">LGBT-Inclusive characters were incorporated into shows that skewed towards Eastern and Pacific viewers and were less watched by Midwesterners. This differential was most pronounced among 18-24 year olds in the Midwest, especially when compared to 18-24 year olds in other regions of the U.S.<strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Motion Pictures and Department Stores Drive Advertising</strong><br />
LGBT characters and plots were woven into some of the most popular broadcast primetime programs last season, and advertisers were investing their budgets there too. Motion pictures and department stores were the top categories that drove advertising on LGBT-inclusive programming, devoting 28.3 percent and 27.6 percent of their ad dollars, respectively.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Credit cards, telephone, and tech companies also spent a significant share of ad dollars with LGBT-friendly programs. Of the top 10 overall advertising categories, retail and pharmaceuticals dedicated less of their ad budgets to these shows than they did on the average for all categories.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29715 alignnone" title="Top Ad Spending Categories" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-1.png" alt="Top Ad Spending Categories" width="407" height="439" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left; font-size:11px;">*This list was determined by GLAAD in conjunction with their Where We  Are On TV Report: 2010-2011 Season, and includes scripted programs such as Modern Family, Grey’s Anatomy, The Office, 90210, Glee and House, as well as reality shows such as Dancing with the Stars and Big Brother 12. GLAAD’s Where We Are on TV Report: 2011-2012 is now available at <a href="http://www.glaad.org" target="_blank">www.glaad.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/the-new-mainstream-28-of-tv-watching-spent-on-lgbt-inclusive-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fathers Win Hearts of Commercial Viewers in Q2 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fathers-win-hearts-of-commercial-viewers-in-q2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fathers-win-hearts-of-commercial-viewers-in-q2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likeability index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV ads featuring "fatherly love" were viewers’ favorites among new commercials debuting in Q2 this year. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV ads featuring &#8220;fatherly love&#8221; were viewers’ favorites among new commercials debuting in Q2 this year. Three of the top 10 most liked new commercials from April to June featured emotive narratives of dads and their sons. The most liked ad, which also ranked as one of the most remembered, was <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf-xxVd8kfE" target="_blank">an Oreo spot where a young boy wakes his father up at midnight to share cookies on Father’s Day</a>. Chevrolet’s ad featuring a son saluting his dad upon his return from the military took the second spot, and a Volkswagen ad where a teen tries unsuccessfully to borrow his dad’s car rounded out the top 10 list.</p>
<p>Orville Redenbacher’s Pop Up Bowl commercial, featuring Criss Angel, was the most memorable ad of the quarter.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Nielsen Top Ten Most Liked New Ads, April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Description</th>
<th>Likeability Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Oreo</td>
<td>Boy wakes up father at midnight for a Father&#8217;s Day treat (:15)</td>
<td>199</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Chevrolet</td>
<td>Boy practices saluting with his brother and salutes his    returning solider father (:30)</td>
<td>177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>L&#8217;Oreal</td>
<td>Revitalift &#8212; Woman explains that she &#8220;stays young&#8221;    any way she can (:15)</td>
<td>158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Magnum</td>
<td>Woman climbs over cars in a traffic jam to get ice cream from a    delivery truck (:30)</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Magnum</td>
<td>Woman climbs    over cars in a traffic jam to get ice cream from a delivery truck (:15)</td>
<td>153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Ritz</td>
<td>Men play    checkers using crackers as playing pieces and then eat the pieces (:15)</td>
<td>149</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fancy Feast</td>
<td>Man builds a room for a cat and has it wear a necklace asking    girlfriend to marry him (:30)</td>
<td>148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Red Lobster</td>
<td>Four Course    Seafood Feast &#8212; Soup, then salad and biscuits, choice of entrée, and    something sweet (:15)</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>Windows 7 &#8212; Buy a fridge for college, get a free ice tray; or    buy a PC for college, get a free Xbox 360 (:15)</td>
<td>146</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>CC &#8212; Boy tries to borrow dad&#8217;s car but dad writes mileage on    driveway (:30)</td>
<td>145</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Only new ad executions considered, airing weeks of April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011. The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Likeability index of 199 the top ranked Oreo ad has proven to be 99% better-liked than the average new commercial during the past three-month period.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Nielsen Top Ten Most Remembered New Ads, April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Description</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Orville Redenbacher</td>
<td>Pop    Up Bowl &#8212; Criss Angel &#8220;magically&#8221; turns a popcorn bag into a    popcorn bowl (:15)</td>
<td>230</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Subway</td>
<td>$5 Footlongs &#8212; The    Orchard Chicken Salad Sub is the May sub of the month (:30)</td>
<td>221</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Hershey&#8217;s</td>
<td>Syrup    &#8212; Children make chocolate milk to a song saying &#8220;stir it up&#8221; (:15)</td>
<td>215</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Oreo</td>
<td>Boy wakes up father    at midnight for a Father&#8217;s Day treat (:15)</td>
<td>214</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Walmart</td>
<td>Ad Match Guarantee &#8212;    Store employees command that competitor&#8217;s price be matched (:30)</td>
<td>213</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Subway</td>
<td>$5 Footlongs &#8212; The    Orchard Chicken Salad Sub is the May sub of the month (:15)</td>
<td>210</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fancy Feast</td>
<td>Man builds a room for a cat and has it wear a necklace asking girlfriend to marry    him (:30)</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>DiGiorno</td>
<td>Pizza    and Boneless Wyngz &#8212; Man gives pizza boy back his menus (:30)</td>
<td>204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>Tiguan    &#8212; Boy cannot break a pinata; it spins to reveal the car logo (:30)</td>
<td>202</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Cheez-It</td>
<td>Cheese mocks scientist and is deemed not mature (:30)</td>
<td>201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen<br />
Only new ad executions considered, airing weeks of April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011. The Recall Score is the percentage of TV viewers who can recall within 24 hours the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Recall Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a recall index of 230 the top ranked Orville Redenbacher ad has proven to be 2.30 times as memorable as the average new commercial during the past three-month period.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fathers-win-hearts-of-commercial-viewers-in-q2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Upfront Look at U.S. TV Audiences and Trends</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/an-upfront-look-at-u-s-tv-audiences-and-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/an-upfront-look-at-u-s-tv-audiences-and-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the 2011 TV Upfronts (the new season preview/meetings between TV studios and advertisers) in full swing, Nielsen takes a look at emerging trends in TV viewing.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the 2011 TV Upfront meetings between TV studios and advertisers in full swing, Nielsen takes a look at emerging trends in TV viewing.</p>
<ul>
<li>Timeshifting continues to be a significant factor in how consumers watch TV.  In fact, 38 percent of all TV households in the U.S. have a DVR</li>
<li>Mobile Video viewing has increased 41 percent from last year.  The heaviest users of mobile video are teens ages 12-17 who watch 7 hours 13 minutes of mobile video a month</li>
<li>Viewing video online also continues to increase.  In January 2011 143.9 million Americans viewed video online</li>
<li>The TV audience for sports is expanding.  Record numbers of African Americans, Hispanics and female viewers helped drive the Super Bowl’s audience growth</li>
<li>The audience overlap between visitors to network and broadcast media sites and social networking &amp; blog sites is significant.  In January 2011 alone, 49 percent of social networking &amp; blog site visitors also visited TV network and broadcast media sites</li>
<li>Television advertising spend was the largest medium for all ad spending in 2010, accounting for $69 billion.</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information on these TV viewing trends, download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/State-of-the-Media-2011-TV-Upfronts.pdf">State of the Media: Trends in TV Viewing- TV Upfronts 2011</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/an-upfront-look-at-u-s-tv-audiences-and-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen at Advertising Week: Fact Sheet and Video Presentations</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-at-advertising-week-fact-sheet-and-video-presentations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-at-advertising-week-fact-sheet-and-video-presentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connected devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online Campaign Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company provides a snapshot of ad spending in 2009 and the first half of 2010 along with videos of its key announcements and findings during the event.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">For Advertising Week, The Nielsen Company provided a snapshot of ad spending in the U.S., including a comparison of ad dollars in 2009 vs. the first half of 2010. While some sectors like Automotive and Auto Insurance are up in 2010, the majority of ad categories are down relative to the same time period in 2009.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/top-10-ad-categories.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-24260 aligncenter" title="top-10-ad-categories" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/top-10-ad-categories.png" alt="top-10-ad-categories" width="555" height="688" /></a></p>
<h3>Ad Spending Overview</h3>
<ul>
<li>$117B was spent on all U.S. advertising in 2009. 57% of all ad spending in 2009 went into Television, making it the largest medium for advertisers. Print media earned approximately 28% of ad dollars, while Internet earned 7% of all ad dollars.</li>
<li>The top spending product category for national TV was Automotive with $3.4B spent in 2009. The most significant growth by any one category among the top 20 was mobile phones, with national TV spend growing almost 200% to $587M in 2009.</li>
<li>Ad dollars spent in primetime in national television account for about 50% of total TV ad dollars.</li>
<li>The 30-second commercial remains the television advertising standard in primetime, accounting for 54% of all commercials (2009). However, the number of 30-second commercials has decreased 5% in primetime, while the number of 15-second commercials has increased 6%.</li>
<li>For more, including ad effectiveness data, download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Nielsen-Advertising-Fact-Sheet.pdf">Nielsen Advertising Fact Sheet</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Event Video</h3>
<p>On Monday, Steve Hasker, President of Media Services, The Nielsen Company, announced a <a href="http://http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-announces-major-step-forward-in-online-advertising-measurement/">&#8220;major step forward&#8221;</a> in online advertising measurement, Nielsen Online Campaign Ratings.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="416" height="337" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb13mDa-cREvNvz2vlbH6XFc=" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="416" height="337" src="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb13mDa-cREvNvz2vlbH6XFc="></embed></object></p>
<p>On Tuesday, Jonathan Carson, CEO of Nielsen&#8217;s Telecom practice, presented findings from Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-connected-devices-age-ipads-kindles-smartphones-and-the-connected-consumer/">Connected Devices Playbook</a>, which measures the impact of iPads, Kindles and various other net-ready devices.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="416" height="337" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb0-tAgpZr9HLUD7FJ5bsbpg=" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="416" height="337" src="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb0-tAgpZr9HLUD7FJ5bsbpg="></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-at-advertising-week-fact-sheet-and-video-presentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research Study Shows TV Viewers Really Do Watch Commercials</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/research-study-shows-tv-viewers-really-do-watch-commercials/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/research-study-shows-tv-viewers-really-do-watch-commercials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council for Research Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conventional wisdom says that people watching TV don’t watch commercials -- they flip channels, get something to eat or otherwise ignore the ads.  In fact, it turns out that conventional wisdom is all wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s always been conventional wisdom that people watching TV don’t watch commercials. They flip channels, get something to eat or otherwise ignore the ads.  In fact, it turns out the conventional wisdom is all wrong: TV advertising and program promotions reach 85% of adults daily, and viewers typically see 26 advertising or promotional breaks &#8212;  accounting for 73 minutes &#8212; each day.</p>
<p>The Video Consumer Mapping (VCM) study sponsored by the <a href="http://www.researchexcellence.com/news/051010_vcm_dm_release.php" target="_blank">Council for Research Excellence</a> (CRE) also found that the frequency of channel-changing and moving rooms is similar before, during and after commercial breaks.  Only 14% of viewers change channels during the break, compared to 11% just before commercials and 13% just after.  Likewise, room changing patterns were similar: 20% of viewers change rooms during commercials, compared to 19% before and 21% after.</p>
<p>Many TV viewers are simultaneously doing other things, but “multi-tasking” behavior patterns don’t change during commercial breaks. Multi-tasking was found to accompany 45% of all media use, with “care for another” and “meal preparation” being the two top activities.  Fully 55% of viewers were found to be solely engaged with media.</p>
<p>“When commercials come on, people stay with the TV.  They only go to the kitchen if they’re hungry, and they don’t fight over the remote,” said Laura Cowan, Vice President and Media Director of RJC Advertising and Chairperson of the CRE’s Media Consumption &amp; Engagement Committee.  “For years, media professionals have been wrestling with the question of whether viewers actually pay attention to commercial breaks.  This new data, the result of actually embedding observers with a statistically significant number of TV viewers, is a major development in terms of learning what people watch and how they watch it.”</p>
<p>The VCM study was the first ever to involve in-person, computer-assisted observation of the media consumption habits of 376 adults and generated data covering more than three-quarters of a million minutes, or a total of 752 observed days.</p>
<p>Read the full <a href="http://www.researchexcellence.com/news/051010_vcm_dm_release.php" target="_blank">Video Consumer Mapping study press release</a> from the Council for Research Excellence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/research-study-shows-tv-viewers-really-do-watch-commercials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multicultural Ad Spending Declines in 2009, but Less than Overall Ad Market</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/multicultural-ad-spending-declines-in-2009-but-less-than-overall-ad-market/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/multicultural-ad-spending-declines-in-2009-but-less-than-overall-ad-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicultural trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spending on Spanish Language and African-American media declined 4.7% and 7.3%, respectively, in 2009, according to figures released today by The Nielsen Company. The declines are consistent with the trend in overall advertising, although the drops aren't as deep. Last month, Nielsen reported that ad spending fell nine percent in 2009, despite significant increases in Cable TV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spending on Spanish Language and African-American media declined 4.7% and 7.3%, respectively, in 2009, according to figures released today by The Nielsen Company. The declines are consistent with the trend in overall advertising, although the drops aren&#8217;t as deep. Last month, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-ad-spend-falls-nine-percent-in-2009-nielsen-says/">Nielsen reported that ad spending fell nine percent in 2009</a>, despite significant increases in Cable TV.</p>
<p><strong>Spanish Language Ad Spending<br />
</strong>Nielsen found that Spanish Language advertising was down 4.7% in the U.S. last year. A total of $5.4 billion was spent on all Spanish Language media in 2009, down almost $270 million from the previous year. The slide was paced by significant declines in National Magazine and Local Newspaper advertising, which were down 38% and 25%, respectively.</p>
<p>The decreases in print media were offset by a 32% increase in Spanish Language Cable advertising. Nielsen found that 19 of the top 20 advertisers in the medium increased their ad spends year over year.</p>
<p>Spot TV was the top cash generator for Spanish Language media in 2009 with an estimated $1.4 billion in ad sales, down 10% compared to the previous year.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Spanish Language Media</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Media Type</th>
<th>2008-$ (000)</th>
<th>2009-$ (000)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Magazine</td>
<td>988.2</td>
<td>0.0</td>
<td>-100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Newspaper</td>
<td>103,144.6</td>
<td>77,059.5</td>
<td>-25.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Magazine</td>
<td>182,096.7</td>
<td>112,558.7</td>
<td>-38.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Cable TV</td>
<td>323,065.0</td>
<td>426,959.4</td>
<td>32.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Network TV</td>
<td>2,982,158.3</td>
<td>2,866,092.5</td>
<td>-3.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot Radio</td>
<td>567,233.9</td>
<td>562,481.3</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot TV</td>
<td>1,559,307.8</td>
<td>1,402,754.4</td>
<td>-10.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>5,717,994.5</strong></td>
<td><strong>5,447,905.7</strong></td>
<td><strong>-4.7%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>African-American Ad Spending<br />
</strong>Spending on African-American media saw a similar decline of 7.3% in 2009. The decline was paced by decreased spending in Network TV (-72%) and National Magazines (-33%).</p>
<p>Increased spending on Cable TV helped balance out the losses. Advertisers spent 35% more on African-American Cable in 2009, thanks to added spending by each one of the top 20 advertisers in the category.</p>
<p>Spot Radio earned the most revenue among African-American media in 2009. Advertisers spent $748 million on the medium last year, almost 10% less than in 2008.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">African American Media</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Media Type</th>
<th>2008 $ (000)</th>
<th>2009 $ (000)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cable TV</td>
<td>539,193.6</td>
<td>728,440.8</td>
<td>35.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Magazine</td>
<td>530,766.1</td>
<td>353,806.7</td>
<td>-33.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot Radio</td>
<td>826,824.5</td>
<td>747,794.7</td>
<td>-9.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network TV</td>
<td>95,524.8</td>
<td>26,626.8</td>
<td>-72.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Syndicated TV</td>
<td>110,638.4</td>
<td>92,935.8</td>
<td>-16.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>2,102,947.5</strong></td>
<td><strong>1,949,604.8</strong></td>
<td><strong>-7.3%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Product Categories</strong><br />
The top spending product category for both Spanish Language and African-American media was Quick Service Restaurants. Advertisers within the category spent $335 million on Spanish Language media and $87 million on African-American media. McDonald’s was the top fast food advertiser in both media segments.</p>
<p>The Automotive category was the next highest spender in both multicultural media. Spending in Spanish Language was down 39% in 2009, paced by double-digit percent losses by each of the top five auto advertisers. Spending by the auto industry in African-American media was down 18% year over year.</p>
<p>The category showing the most growth among the top 10 Spanish Language advertisers was Satellite TV providers. Advertisers in this category upped their ad spends 77% in 2009, as satellite TV companies made the pitch for their services in the run up to the DTV transition in June 2009. According to Nielsen data, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/dtv-adoption-now-above-99-in-u-s/">a larger percentage of Hispanic households were not ready for the transition than non-Hispanic households at the end of 2008.</a></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Spanish Language Categories</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product Category</th>
<th>2008-$ (000)</th>
<th>2009-$ (000)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">RESTAURANT-QUICK SVC</td>
<td>293,652.9</td>
<td>334,593.0</td>
<td>13.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AUTOMOTIVE</td>
<td>528,577.9</td>
<td>323,230.0</td>
<td>-38.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">TELEPH SVCS-WIRELESS</td>
<td>316,808.3</td>
<td>305,463.7</td>
<td>-3.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">STORE-DEPT</td>
<td>307,345.4</td>
<td>294,420.8</td>
<td>-4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">SATELLITE COMM SVCS</td>
<td>134,658.1</td>
<td>238,744.6</td>
<td>77.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">DIR RESP PROD</td>
<td>220,632.3</td>
<td>237,227.6</td>
<td>7.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">BEER</td>
<td>165,045.9</td>
<td>171,677.7</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">LEGAL SVCS</td>
<td>89,684.3</td>
<td>123,847.0</td>
<td>38.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MOTION PICTURE</td>
<td>112,015.0</td>
<td>99,846.5</td>
<td>-10.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">INSURANCE-AUTO</td>
<td>144,305.0</td>
<td>98,084.0</td>
<td>-32.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Insurance companies showed the most growth among the top 10 African-American media spenders. General Insurance and Car Insurance categories placed 8<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup> after increases of 29% and 24%, respectively. The Motion Picture category showed similar growth, increasing its spend 24% to $72 million.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">African American Categories</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product Category</th>
<th>2008-$ (000)</th>
<th>2009-$ (000)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">RESTAURANT-QUICK SVC</td>
<td>72,909.6</td>
<td>86,906.8</td>
<td>19.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AUTOMOTIVE</td>
<td>105,005.7</td>
<td>85,851.1</td>
<td>-18.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">STORE-DEPT</td>
<td>76,117.9</td>
<td>72,234.3</td>
<td>-5.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MOTION PICTURE</td>
<td>58,094.9</td>
<td>71,937.5</td>
<td>23.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">TELEPH SVCS-WIRELESS</td>
<td>52,610.6</td>
<td>50,602.5</td>
<td>-3.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PHARMACEUTICAL</td>
<td>50,542.5</td>
<td>47,556.1</td>
<td>-5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">DIR RESP PROD</td>
<td>41,810.4</td>
<td>43,544.9</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">INSURANCE</td>
<td>26,739.2</td>
<td>34,378.2</td>
<td>28.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">INSURANCE-AUTO</td>
<td>26,285.0</td>
<td>32,521.9</td>
<td>23.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">CREDIT SVCS</td>
<td>23,052.1</td>
<td>28,204.4</td>
<td>22.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr /><strong> </strong><em>NOTE: The following methodologies are used to identify Spanish Language and African-American categories:</em></p>
<p><em><strong>Spanish Language<br />
</strong>- 5 television networks, 6 cable networks<br />
- 53 local television stations across 27 markets<br />
- 74 radio stations across 24 markets<br />
- 8 local newspapers across 5 markets<br />
- 20 national magazines</em></p>
<p><em><strong>African-American<br />
</strong><strong>- Radio: </strong>105 stations across 34 markets. The following formats were included: Black News &amp; Talk, Gospel, Urban Reggaeton, Smooth Jazz, Urban, Urban AC, and Urban Oldies.<br />
<strong>- Network &amp; Syndication TV: </strong>Programs with an African-American audience composition of 50% or greater.<br />
<strong>- National Magazines: </strong>12 national magazines<br />
<strong>- Cable TV: </strong>BET &amp; TV One, as well as other programs across various networks that achieve an African-American audience comp of 50% or greater and African-American P2+ projection of 100,000 or greater.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/multicultural-ad-spending-declines-in-2009-but-less-than-overall-ad-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Recalled Hybrid TV Ads of 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-recalled-hybrid-tv-ads-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-recalled-hybrid-tv-ads-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG compiled a list of the most recalled hybrid ads (where sponsor messaging is combined with program or entertainment content) for 2009.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Hybrid Ad Description</th>
<th> Associated Program</th>
<th> Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Bayer</td>
<td>Heart Health tips from Bayer and the cast of Monk</td>
<td>Monk (USA)</td>
<td>310</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Cadillac</td>
<td>Cadillac presents season premiere and sneak previews; sponsor of Damages Giveaway</td>
<td>Damages (FX)</td>
<td>307</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Hallmark</td>
<td>Hallmark helps you find home for lonely pets during the holidays</td>
<td>A Dog Named Christmas (CBS)</td>
<td>303</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Golden Corral</td>
<td>Sponsor of &#8220;Slam of the Week&#8221; and &#8220;WWE Rewind&#8221;</td>
<td>WWE Monday Night RAW (USA)</td>
<td>291</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>McDonald&#8217;s</td>
<td>Contestants can win $1 Million in the Monopoly Dice Roll game</td>
<td>NBC network</td>
<td>289</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Orville Redenbacher&#8217;s</td>
<td>Orville Redenbacher&#8217;s invites you to pop a bag of popcorn and watch</td>
<td>America&#8217;s Got Talent (NBC)</td>
<td>282</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Coleman</td>
<td>Kate Gosselin sets up a tent in &#8220;Guide to Camping&#8221; segment</td>
<td>Jon &amp; Kate Plus 8 (TLC)</td>
<td>280</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Yoplait</td>
<td>Breast cancer survivor gets trip to Peru from Yoplait in &#8220;Army Wives Gives Back&#8221; segment</td>
<td>Army Wives (LIFE)</td>
<td>279</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Ragu</td>
<td>Hayes family is shown together, including scenes with kids slurping pasta</td>
<td>Table for 12 (TLC)</td>
<td>278</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Smirnoff</td>
<td>Smirnoff presents a special look at Nip/Tuck characters during premiere party</td>
<td>Nip/Tuck (FX)</td>
<td>272</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: Nielsen IAG (NielsenIAG.com), Coverage: Primetime programs on ABC, CBS, CW, FOX, NBC, A&amp;E, BRAVO, COMEDY, DSC, ESPN, FOOD, FX, HIST, HGTV, LIFE, MTV, NAN, SYFY, SPEED, TBS, TLC, TNT, USA and VH1</p>
<p>Hybrids air during commercial pods and include customized ads, branded promos, vignettes, interstitials and micro-series where sponsor messaging is combined with program or entertainment content. Among viewers 13+. Only new executions considered, airing from Jan &#8211; Nov 2009. Results for this annual list are aggregated to the brand/program or brand/network level. The Recall Score is the percentage of TV viewers who can recall within 24 hours the sponsor of a Hybrid ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing primetime TV on broadcast and major cable networks. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new Hybrids during the time period (Recall Index). 100 equals average Recall.</p>
<p>For example, with a Recall Index of 310 the top ranked Bayer/Monk tie-in has proven to be over 3 times as memorable as the average new Hybrid ad during Jan- Nov 2009.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-recalled-hybrid-tv-ads-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey: Most Super Bowl Viewers Tune in for the Commercials</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/survey-most-super-bowl-viewers-tune-in-for-the-commercials/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/survey-most-super-bowl-viewers-tune-in-for-the-commercials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randall Beard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The majority of Super Bowl viewers enjoy the game’s ads more than the action on the field, according to results of a recent survey by The Nielsen Company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The majority of Super Bowl viewers enjoy the game’s ads more than the action on the field, according to results of a survey released today by The Nielsen Company. Fifty-one percent of those questioned said they most enjoy the commercials that air throughout the game when compared to the Super Bowl game itself. Forty-nine percent said that they enjoy the game more than the ads. Results were based on a sample of more than 25,000 households in Nielsen’s Homescan panel.</p>
<p>“This survey reinforces the value of the Super Bowl as a marketing bonanza, featuring one of the most receptive TV audiences in the world,” said Randall Beard, executive vice president of Nielsen IAG. “With so many viewers waiting for the pitch, the pressure is on advertisers to create and place ads that will have a lasting impact.”</p>
<p><strong>Score early<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">It’s no secret that Super Bowl ads on average are more effective than the typical television commercial. But when it comes to ad placement, one trend is clear: earlier really is better. Ads placed in the first quarter of the Super Bowl are better remembered and are better liked. There is a steep drop-off as the game progresses until the fourth quarter, when ad performance settles at a level that is closer to the average for all television ads.</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/superbowl-ad-effectiveness.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19438" title="superbowl-ad-effectiveness" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/superbowl-ad-effectiveness.png" alt="superbowl-ad-effectiveness" width="575" height="301" /></a></p>
<p>“Even in the Super Bowl, viewers can fall victim to ‘ad fatigue,’” said Beard. “Viewers have difficulty maintaining such a high level of focus for that many ads. It doesn’t matter if the game is a blowout or a nail-biter.”</p>
<p>More Nielsen data regarding consumer spending, media consumption and social media will be released in the run up to the Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/survey-most-super-bowl-viewers-tune-in-for-the-commercials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Spending in U.S. Down 11.5 Percent in First Three Quarters of 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/ad-spending-in-u-s-down-11-5-percent-in-first-three-quarters-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/ad-spending-in-u-s-down-11-5-percent-in-first-three-quarters-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=18594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preliminary figures show that expenditures fell $10.9 billion to a total spend of $83.4 billion in the first nine months of the year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Nielsen, spending on advertising fell 11.5 percent in the first three quarters of 2009, compared to the same time period in 2008. Preliminary figures show that expenditures fell $10.9 billion to a total spend of $83.4 billion in the first nine months of the year.</p>
<p>Cable TV (+ 9.1%), Spanish Language Cable TV (+36.7%), and Free-Standing Insert (FSI) Coupons (+11.2%) were the only three measured media to post any growth. The remaining media suffered declines, ranging from Internet (-0.5%) to Local Sunday Supplements (-48.3%).</p>
<p>&#8220;The struggling economy continues to take its toll on the advertising industry, with most sectors lower than last year,&#8221; said Terrie Brennan, Senior VP for New Business Development at Nielsen. “In general, television – particularly cable television – seems to be holding up better than print-based media. For example, Local Newspapers have seen 12,000 <em>fewer</em> advertisers in their pages in 2009. Meanwhile, nine of the top ten Cable TV advertisers have <em>increased</em> their spending in the medium so far this year.&#8221;</p>
<table class="chart" border="0" width="450">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Year-to-Year Change in Ad Spend by Media</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Media Category*</th>
<th>1Q-3Q 2009<br />
vs. 1Q-3Q 2008<br />
%Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spanish Language Cable TV</td>
<td>36.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FSI Coupon</td>
<td>11.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cable TV</td>
<td>9.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internet**</td>
<td>-0.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spanish Language Network TV</td>
<td>-4.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spot Radio</td>
<td>-9.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Network Radio</td>
<td>-10.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spot TV 101-210 DMAs</td>
<td>-12.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>National Sunday Supplement</td>
<td>-13.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Network TV</td>
<td>-13.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Local Newspaper</td>
<td>-14.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Outdoor</td>
<td>-15.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Syndicated TV</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spot TV Top 100 DMAs</td>
<td>-16.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>National Magazine</td>
<td>-21.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>National Newspaper</td>
<td>-21.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Local Magazine</td>
<td>-25.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>B-to-B Magazines</td>
<td>-33.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Local Sunday Supplement</td>
<td>-48.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Grand Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>-11.5%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2"><em>Source: The Nielsen Company 2009<br />
</em>* All data from non-Internet media pulled from Nielsen’s Ad*Views database<br />
** Internet advertising expenditures pulled from AdRelevance database and account for CPM-based, image-based advertising. These reported estimated expenditures do not account for paid search advertising, text only, paid fee services, performance-based campaigns, sponsorships, barters, in-stream (&#8221;pre-rolls&#8221;) players, messenger applications, partnership advertising, promotions and email campaigns, or house advertising activity.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Spanish language television&#8217;s ad spend (cable and network combined) fell a slight 0.7 percent, while African-American TV (a subset of Network, Cable, Syndicated, and Local) enjoyed a 31 percent increase in spending. Overall, TV ad spending fell 8.3 percent year-to-year through the first three quarters. But ads placed on television accounted for 56.8 percent of all advertising expenditures so far this year, up two percentage points over the same period in 2008.</p>
<p><strong>Product Category Advertising</strong><br />
Automotive continued its reign as the top ad-spending category through the first three quarters of 2009, despite a nearly 31 percent decline. The Pharmaceutical category placed a far second, even with a 4.6 percent decline of its own. Only two categories in the top ten showed any growth: Direct Response Products (+3.3%) and Quick Service Restaurants (+1.8%).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top Ten Product Categories by Ad Spend</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product Category</th>
<th>Q1-Q3 2009 (millions)</th>
<th>Q1-Q3 2008 (millions)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Automotive(Factory &amp; Dealer Assoc.)</td>
<td valign="bottom">$5,392.8</td>
<td valign="bottom">$7,802.7</td>
<td valign="bottom">-30.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pharmaceutical</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,236.9</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,391.9</td>
<td valign="bottom">-4.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Quick Service Restaurant</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,073.6</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,019.8</td>
<td valign="bottom">1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Wireless Telephone Services</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,545.7</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,690.8</td>
<td valign="bottom">-5.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Department Stores</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,472.3</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,543.6</td>
<td valign="bottom">-2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Motion Picture</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,457.3</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,499.1</td>
<td valign="bottom">-1.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Auto Dealerships &#8211; Local</td>
<td valign="bottom">$2,414.7</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,305.4</td>
<td valign="bottom">-26.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Direct Response Products</td>
<td valign="bottom">$1,840.1</td>
<td valign="bottom">$1,780.7</td>
<td valign="bottom">3.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Restaurants</td>
<td valign="bottom">$1,193.3</td>
<td valign="bottom">$1,237.5</td>
<td valign="bottom">-3.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Furniture Stores</td>
<td valign="bottom">$1,069.7</td>
<td valign="bottom">$1,152.9</td>
<td valign="bottom">-7.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Top 10 Product Categories</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>$25,696.3</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>$29,424.3</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>-12.7%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4"><em>Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
</em>NOTE: Data excludes B-to-B Magazine spending<strong> </strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Further Nielsen analysis of the top product categories unveils some revealing insights on where their money was spent through the first three quarters of 2009:</p>
<ul>
<li>Almost 70 percent of all U.S. ad spending by the top ten product categories was invested in television.</li>
<li>Despite Pharmaceutical’s overall decline, the category upped its radio ad spend 137 percent and its Internet spend increased by one-third.</li>
<li>Television ad spend by Quick Service Restaurants remained essentially flat year-over-year, but the category dramatically boosted its print (+42%) and Internet (+88%) budgets.</li>
<li>Local Auto Dealerships dropped their overall ad budgets 27 percent, but increased Internet ad spends 45 percent. The category is also the only one out the top ten that spent more on print media ($1.5 billion) than TV ($610 million) in the first nine months of the year.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/ad-spending-in-u-s-down-11-5-percent-in-first-three-quarters-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

