If you live in the U.S., you’re starting to hear more and more about the upcoming census. Even before we get data back from the country-wide headcount, we know that America’s demographic profile is undergoing major changes. By 2050, more than half of the U.S. population will be non-white (African-American, Asian, Hispanic). This dynamic growth represents not only significant cultural shifts, but also one of the more remarkable marketing opportunities in history. By that same 2050 milestone, the economic opportunity for brands in the multicultural CPG space is projected to exceed $500B.

Being able to keep pace with these increasingly diverse and demanding segments will require marketers to have a detailed view of what ethnic households buy as well as how they consumer media across TV, Internet and Mobile. When compared against the general population, minority households tend to over-index on some key shopping and media metrics.

Topline Multicultural Buying Insights

When compared to the general population, on average…

Hispanic Shoppers

• Tend to spend more on categories for babies and children — (Hispanic households represent 11.8% of CPG total spending, but 16.6% of disposable diaper sales.)
• Tend to spend more in traditional mass merchandise and warehouse clubs
• Tend to spend more on food consumed at home

African American Shoppers

• Tend to spend more on health and beauty products, like fragrance (African Americans represent 11.0% of CPG total spending, but 20.3% of dollars spent in beauty supply stores.)
• Tend to spend more in drug and dollar stores
• Tend to spend more on ingredients used to cook from scratch
• Tend to buy fewer items on deals or with coupons
• Tend to spend more on food consumed at home

Asian American Shoppers

• Tend to spend more in club stores (Asian Americans represent 3.0% of CPG total spending, but 5.5% of dollars spent in warehouse clubs.)
• Tend to spend more on categories for babies and children
• Are more likely to eat outside of the home

Topline Multicultural Media Insights

Hispanic Media Consumers

• Strong following of Telenovelas
• On average, watch more broadcast and satellite TV
• Display higher usage of mobile internet

African American Media Consumers

• Have the highest TV usage of any demographic at nearly 80 hours a week per household
• Have a higher percentage of multi-set households
• Display higher usage of mobile internet

Asian American Media Consumers

• More likely to have newer technology (DVD, HD, Digital Cable)
• Tend to watch less TV

While each group has many layers of cultural, economic and social diversity within, these broader trends are worth noting, and planning for, if marketers are to meet the needs of their fastest growing consumer base.

Part 5 of 5 on Healthy Eating Trends and Myths

Tom Pirovano, Director of Industry Insights

For years, retailers, manufacturers and marketers have been clamoring for a single benchmark that would facilitate comparisons of healthy eating patterns by key regions and time periods. Although The Nielsen Company has frequently reported on healthy eating trends, most insights have been focused on individual characteristics or product claims like “organic” or “fat free.” The missing piece of the puzzle has been a single measure that includes a combination of several key healthy eating indicators across multiple categories.

By combining the sales of 13 healthy eating components relative to total (UPC-coded food sales), the Nielsen Healthy Eating Index can track healthy eating choices over time and monitor the impact of industry health and wellness initiatives. The index is calculated by adding supermarket sales for products with health claims on their label, like “natural” or “reduced calorie.” Sales are also added from some inherently healthy categories like fresh produce.

Adjustments are made to give more weight to key healthy eating indicators with relatively low sales like omega and antioxidant claims. Other health claims with strong sales like “reduced fat” and “natural” are given less weight to avoid having fluctuations in commodity prices adding volatility to the Index.

Some products with multiple health claims like bread labeled “organic,” “whole wheat” and “high fiber” are counted in each group. The total dollar volume of these products is then divided by total UPC-coded food sales to make sure the Index is not disrupted by severe changes in total food volume or pricing.

For example, the data below shows that dollar sales of foods making an “antioxidant” claim represent 4.1% of the Index based on dollars and a weighting factor of 200%. Products with “Fat” claims make the largest contribution to the Index – even when excluding milk sales and factoring by 50%.

According to the Nielsen Healthy Eating Index, the U.S. is making progress on the healthy eating front, scoring 402 in 2009 vs. 389 in 2008. The chart below shows the seasonal nature of healthy eating habits across the U.S. You’ll notice that every year, consumers make unhealthy food choices over the holidays. Then in January, diets get back on track and healthy eating is a priority again. Another observation is that January seems to set the tone for healthy eating throughout the year. The month of September (back-to-school) is another time when Americans tend to make healthier food decisions.

The Nielsen Healthy Eating Index is a subjective approach to measuring healthy eating trends including better-for-you alternatives. It will allow both retailers and manufacturers to measure their efforts to promote healthier food choices. For more information on food and nutrition, visit the American Dietetic Association at www.eatright.org. For information on USDA’s dietary guidance and recommendations, visit www.mypyramid.gov.

Over time we expect to fine-tune the Nielsen Index based on the latest nutritional research available. Stay tuned to Nielsen Wire for more on this new metric. In the coming weeks, we will look at January healthy eating trends setting the pace for 2010. We’ll also compare major U.S. markets using the Nielsen Healthy Eating Index.

Healthy Eating Trends

• Part 1: Commitment Trumps the Economic Pinch
• Part 2: Organic Enthusiasts Remain Loyal
• Part 3: Eating Healthy Doesn’t Have To Cost More
• Part 4: Store Brands Expand Healthy Offerings
• Part 5: Healthy Eating Index Debuts

Part 4 of 5 on Healthy Eating Trends and Myths

Tom Pirovano, Director of Industry Insights

U.S. retailers continue to make progress in offering store brand products with health claims relevant to shoppers looking for healthier food choices. Store brands flexed their marketing muscle in the health claims arena putting impressive growth numbers on the leader board in emerging, albeit smaller, trend areas such as genetically modified organism (GMO) free, gluten free and absence of a specific fat. Store brands now comprise almost 40% of products with preservative claims, one-fourth of organic product sales, and nearly one-fifth of all products with natural and fat claims in food/drug/mass merchandise retailers.

Supermarkets have been quick to launch certified organic products with their own store brands. And in the natural food channel, research from SPINS shows that the natural food consumer will migrate to items that deliver natural product benefits and full flavor under a familiar retail banner.

The success of Topco’s Full Circle line encompassing more than 1,000 products in 90 categories, the 300 “O” Organics products and 200 Eating Right items speak to the potential of retailer brands throughout the store. More categories are soon to follow, based on the recent announcement that Sam’s Club plans on launching a private label Rue 33 premium French vodka, likely inspired by the success of rival Costco’s Kirkland label of vodka, scotch, tequila, wines and beer.

Conversely, store brand development lags with respect to the products with newer claims such as high fructose corn syrup free, with many retailers adopting a wait-and-see attitude to determine if a claim has “legs” or is merely the latest blip on the consumer trend screen.

Healthy Eating Trends

• Part 1: Commitment Trumps the Economic Pinch
• Part 2: Organic Enthusiasts Remain Loyal
• Part 3: Eating Healthy Doesn’t Have To Cost More
• Part 4: Store Brands Expand Healthy Offerings
• Part 5: Healthy Eating Index Debuts

Part 3 of 5 on Healthy Eating Trends and Myths

Tom Pirovano, Director of Industry Insights

One common misconception heard frequently is that healthy eating has become too expensive—that the struggling economy has driven U.S. families to make poor nutritional choices. Using a wealth of scanned checkout data from food, drug and mass merchandise retailers, Nielsen monitors food sales trends to separate the truth from perceptions.

While the economy can be blamed for sales declines of some foods, there is overwhelming evidence to support that healthy eating doesn’t have to cost more. In fact, the packaged food industry has made great strides on multiple fronts by adding more healthy nutrients, and removing saturated fats, calories and sodium from foods wherever possible, all while holding the line on costs.

Consider these facts:

• Low-cost healthy alternatives are readily available. Although organic foods often cost more than non-organic, supermarkets offer several healthy alternatives for a given food item at the same price. Consider diet sodas, low-fat dairy, light beer, low-sodium crackers, low-sugar cereals and oatmeal. Even the higher-priced natural food channel managed to hold overall price increases to just 1.4% for the year end 2009, according to SPINS.
• Fast food “value” meals can’t compete with supermarket pricing. What you really get from a quick-serve restaurant is quick service. Convenience will save time, but not save money. Supermarket alternatives are often cheaper and healthier, but they take more time to prepare. For example, a $1 sausage biscuit from a drive-thru has 31% more calories and nearly 7 times more fat than TWO bowls of instant oatmeal with an average retail price of 31 cents per packet.
• The lowest cost beverage solution is the most healthful. With zero calories and 24/7 availability, water is still the least expense beverage in most homes. Sales of packaged beverages in U.S. food/drug/mass retailers exceeded $85 billion in 2009. Just think; the money saved by drinking tap water could bail out a bank.
• It’s not what we eat, it’s how much. Contrary to popular opinion, less is not always more—especially when it comes to counting calories. Eating less is always less expensive than eating more. And although no one ever likes to hear this, the most successful diets are the ones that involve less food.
• Eating poorly almost always costs more. Forget about the long-term medical costs of obesity. Healthy eating costs less right now and despite the economy, consumers are actively taking steps to improve their diets as evidenced by the double-digit growth rates for products with label claims for omega (+42%), high fructose corn syrup free (+29%), antioxidants (+16%), gluten free / probiotic / calcium claim (+13%), fiber claim (+12%), and low glycemic / no salt or sodium added (+10%).

The real opportunity cost of healthy eating is convenience (and sometimes taste), not the dollars spent. Although preparing meals at home may take more time, it enables families to eat well without breaking their budgets, and afford the chance to spend quality time together at meals. And consumers are eager to make it work. According to Nielsen, amateur chefs drove cooking/health and healing book sales into the stratosphere with a 31% annual growth rate during a year when total book sales were down 3%. A hunger for knowledge had more than one million viewers tuning in to The Food Network during prime time and 11% of Internet surfers visiting food web sites.

Sometimes the benefits of healthy eating are more intangible, but equally important to physical and mental development and the family. Multiple independent studies drew a direct correlation between family meal time attendance, better nutrition and improved children’s grades.

Healthy Eating Trends

• Part 1: Commitment Trumps the Economic Pinch
• Part 2: Organic Enthusiasts Remain Loyal
• Part 3: Eating Healthy Doesn’t Have To Cost More
• Part 4: Store Brands Expand Healthy Offerings
• Part 5: Healthy Eating Index Debuts

Part 2 of 5 on Healthy Eating Trends and Myths

Tom Pirovano, Director of Industry Insights, The Nielsen Company

It’s the economy! Organics enjoyed stratospheric growth in four of the last five years, but the economic crunch took a bite out of that trajectory in 2009. U.S. dollar sales surged 132% between 2004-2008, building the organics category to more than $4.0 billion in food/drug/mass merchandise retailers, according to Nielsen. In 2008, organic dollar sales decelerated to 16% annual growth, expanding to $4.6 billion. That rate fell to the single digits in 2009, with organics sprouting a modest 2.1% gain for total sales of $4.7 billion in the food/drug/mass merchandiser channels.

The 2009 U.S. organic market size expands by an additional $1.5 billion when natural channel sales captured by SPINS are added to the equation, bringing the all-channel total to $6.2 billion. Mirroring the mainstream channel slowdown, organic sales lost pace in the natural channel as well, albeit to a lesser degree at 4.3%. This is thanks in large part to core loyalists who represent 20% of organic consumers and 80% of organic UPC-coded dollar volume in the natural channel.

Dedicated organic buyers will cross channel shop and purchase private label organics to sustain their lifestyle commitment. In another nod to the economy, organics fared better as house brands such as the Topco Full Circle and Safeway O Organics lines than branded offerings at higher price points. Increased availability and consumer acceptance of private label has expanded its share of organic sales to 24%.

In a survey by The Packer, a produce industry publication, almost 50% of consumers said they would buy organic fruits and vegetables if price was not an issue. The global nature of the economic crisis was underscored in a Nielsen study from Great Britain, where the percent of people who felt “it was worth paying extra for organic food” plunged from 27% to 18% between 2006 and 2009.

Healthy Eating Trends

• Part 1: Commitment Trumps the Economic Pinch
• Part 2: Organic Enthusiasts Remain Loyal
• Part 3: Eating Healthy Doesn’t Have To Cost More
• Part 4: Store Brands Expand Healthy Offerings
• Part 5: Healthy Eating Index Debuts

Part 1 of 5 on Healthy Eating Trends and Myths

Tom Pirovano, Director of Industry Insights
Consumers in the U.S. might be trimming the fat from their budgets and diets, but contrary to predictions, they continue to demonstrate a healthy appetite for foods featuring health and wellness claims. From alpha (antioxidants) to omega (omega 3 fatty acids), foods touting the kind of heart-healthy, joint-buffering, free radical-extinguishing properties that appeal to aging Baby Boomers dominate the rapid growth list.

The big winners on the healthy eating front, each posting double digit growth, were products with label claims for omega, high fructose corn syrup free, antioxidants, gluten-free, probiotic, calcium, fiber and low glycemic and no salt/sodium added.

Still champions
Many longstanding health claims maintained their popularity even as upstart health and wellness claims debuted on the healthy eating scene. Chief among them: products with fat claims—generating 2009 sales of $46.1 billion—slid a modest 3% vs. 2008 results. This dip was attributable in large part to milk, which contributes $11.5 billion to all fat-claim product sales. Even though milk unit sales remained relatively flat (-0.5%), lower prices dried up milk dollar sales, which ended the year down 16.7%.

Other popular claims holding their own included products labeled “natural,” with $22.8 billion in annual sales representing 4% growth vs. 2008. The natural claim demonstrated real star power, outselling organics by more than a 4:1 margin in food, drug and mass merchandise retailers. Sodium claims—a $14.9 billion category dominated by soda products—kept its effervescence, recording no change in dollar sales over the last 12 months.

The “better-for-you” health movement to reduce saturated and trans fats resulted in a slender 1% uptick in products with an absence of a specific fat label claim—a $14.8 billion category. Products with a preservative claim still resonated with shoppers, resulting in a 1% sales gain to $14.5 billion. And that perennial favorite claim of “reduced calories” sold $11.7 billion in 2009, up 6% as consumers pursued the elusive goal of weight loss.

Losing favor
“Lowers cholesterol”—one of the established knockouts among widespread health claims—lost ground in 2009. Dollar sales for all products featuring cholesterol claims dropped 5% to $10.6 billion. The uptick in effective statin drugs used to lower cholesterol may be a primary contributor to the decline in popularity—a trend to watch. If an equally effective weight-loss drug is ever developed, it may have a similar impact on “low-fat,” low calorie and sugar-free products.

Hormone/antibiotic-free food claims—a $2.2 billion category—declined 2%, but with milk representing the largest contributor of hormone-free products, this finding is more a reflection of milk pricing than a shift in consumer preference. The low-carb movement was put on a diet, with sales dropping 5% in the $1.8 billion category as the popularity of the Atkins Diet continues to wane. And soy claim popularity dipped in both traditional food/drug/mass merchandise outlets (down 6% per Nielsen) and natural food channels (down 4.1% per SPINS).

Other claims that failed to gain traction included products with flax or hemp seed—a comparatively small category generating only $137million in traditional channels—showing a sales decline of 8%.

The pattern was reversed in the natural food channel, where flax seed sprouted a 1.2% sales increase and hemp products roped in 9.0% more sales than the prior year, according to SPINS. Although sales trends in the natural food channel may differ from mainstream retail channels, natural outlets may help marketers identify the newest trends in healthy eating. One such trend is Stevia, which has recently found its way onto the food/drug/mass sweetener aisle and into major brands. Can Kombucha—a fermented beverage made of tea and bacteria cultures—(up 18% / $6.7 million) in natural food stores be far behind?

Healthy impact
Savvy marketers understand that being part of a healthy lifestyle solution reflects positively on almost any brand—or retailer. Retailers can further leverage and deepen their relationship with shoppers through programs ranging from Wii Fit exhibitions on-site to light cooking demonstrations and product tastings. With no shortage of news stories on child obesity, families will continue to seek out brands and retailers offering healthy alternatives.

Healthy Eating Trends

• Part 1: Commitment Trumps the Economic Pinch
• Part 2: Organic Enthusiasts Remain Loyal
• Part 3: Eating Healthy Doesn’t Have To Cost More
• Part 4: Store Brands Expand Healthy Offerings
• Part 5: Healthy Eating Index Debuts

SUMMARY: Purchasing decisions in 2010 will be affected by factors such as brand innovation, retailer assortment, proliferation of store brands, and healthy eating preferences. Walmart’s “Project Impact” strategy and other similar retailer initiatives will test consumer preferences for clean aisles and lower prices vs. broader product selection. In the first few months of 2010, sales of healthier eating alternatives should be a good indicator of consumer confidence. As 2009 brought an increase in coupon activity, CPG manufacturers will look for more efficient and effective ways to reach consumers vs. traditional trade spending. Time will tell if new product innovation will be enough to drive shoppers back to traditional brands.

Throughout the recession, retailers and manufacturers have stepped up efforts to bring about innovation that seize the moment and “drive the recession wave” rather than “ride the recession wave”. Winners in 2010 will continue to innovate in the form of new formats, service offerings and differentiated products—a list of best bets for 2010 is described below.

Winning Brands Will Innovate and Differentiate
Sales of store brands have grown by $12 billion (up 17%) vs. two years ago as shoppers focus on value. As the economy improves, value is still important, but smart marketers are differentiating brands through innovation—with new products, new flavors, new packaging and with marketing/media campaigns with a heavy emphasis on social media to build rapid awareness and product trial. Brands that fail to innovate may also fail to win buyers back from store brands.

Product Assortment is a Point of Differentiation
Some retailers have followed the lead of Walmart’s “Project Impact” with cleaner aisles and limited assortment. Others have an opportunity to set themselves apart with a wider selection of products. Supermarkets that struggle to compete with Walmart’s prices will find an advantage with shoppers looking for variety. The trick is finding which categories require the broadest selection.

Healthy Eating Is a Solid Measure of Consumer Confidence
As the economy improves, consumers will focus on health and wellness priorities. An increase in sales of foods labeled “organic”, “natural” and “high fiber” as well as diet aids and reduced calorie/fat frozen dinners and entrees will be an indicator that consumer confidence is growing. Look for the first signs after the holidays, when consumers tend to start those New Year diets.

Manufacturers Get Stingy with Trade Promotion Spending
A whopping 50 million products each year—43% of supermarket purchases—are sold with a feature ad, display or price reduction funded primarily by manufacturers. An increase in coupon activity and new advertising opportunities such as cell phone apps and in-store TV networks will stretch promotion budgets. Retailers need to demonstrate sales performance to get their fair share of trade funds.

Direct to Consumer Options Thrive
Online price wars and the squeeze on in-store assortment will fuel large and small manufacturers to give consumers options to buy direct from manufacturers or from online services from the likes of Amazon, Drugstore.com and Alice.com.

2010 U.S. Outlook

Part 1: Cross Media

• Big Screen, Smart Screen, Small Screen: Top 5 Cross-Media Trends
• You Can Take It With You: Future Trends In Media

---

Part 2: Consumer

• Winner Winner Chicken Dinner – Top 5 Consumer Goods Spending Trends
• Innovation Creates Opportunities for CPG Growth
• Aging Puts a Wrinkle in U.S. Marketplace

---

Part 3: Advertising

• Talking Back – Top Five Advertising Trends
• Get Ready for the Audience-Centric Web
• What Would John Wanamaker Say Today?

---

Part 4: Entertainment

• There’s No Business Like Show Business – Top Five Entertainment Trends
• Game On – The World is Watching More Than Ever
• Video Games in Play

Trade promotions include products featured in ads and in-store circulars, products displayed on end of aisle caps or away from their normal self location and products with temporary price reductions.

“Although we shouldn’t be surprised by an increase in promoted sales during a recession, it’s stunning to see an additional 1.3 billion purchase decisions being influence by in-store promotions,” said Tom Pirovano, Director, Industry Insights at Nielsen.

Other key findings from Nielsen’s study:

• Chicagoans buy the most on promotion, with 55.9 percent of products sold on promotion, followed by Phoenix, Oahu and Indianapolis.
• San Antonio, Oklahoma City/Tulsa and Birmingham have the lowest promotion sales.
• Impulse purchases such as ice cream, crackers and carbonated beverages sell the most on promotion.
• Conversely, magazines, ice and tobacco sell the least on promotion.

In other promotional activity, Nielsen found that coupon activity – -which has seen a strong resurgence among American consumers over the last year – was highest is disposable diapers (21% of which were sold with a coupon), dough products (14%) and sanitary protection (12%).  By measuring the average number of units purchased per trip, Nielsen identified canned cat food, baby food and canned dog food as the best candidate for buy-one-get-one (BOGO) promotions. This same measure found that coffee makers, baking powder and dishwasher rinse aids are the weakest categories for BOGO promotions.

“The key for consumer product manufacturers is to set goals for each trade promotion, and then measure the results to determine which promo events are the most efficient and effective,” said Pirovano.  “Retailers who can drive their feature ads with the right mix of products, price points and display support will have success with both their vendors and shoppers.”

So what are the top selling categories in the drug channel? Six of the top eleven categories are outside the health and beauty care category.  Tobacco leads the way with almost $3 billion in sales, an increase of 18 percent from last year.  Cold/allergy remedies, nutritional supplements, headache remedies and chocolate candy round out the top five.   In terms of growth leaders, pet care products posted a 67 percent increase from last year, followed by depilatories and peanut butter.  Of the eleven categories showing the strongest growth, eight are foods.

But the leading chains such as Walgreens, CVS and Rite Aid are stepping up their efforts to innovate and bring more customers through their doors.  As with grocery stores, private label products are increasing their share of sales, with store branded cold/allergy remedies, nutritional supplements and headache remedies leading the way. Meanwhile, private label pet care, laundry detergent and antacids have shown the most growth.  Some of the chains are establishing in-store medical clinics, where customers can receive services such as blood pressure screenings, treatment for common maladies and flu shots.   Others are making the shopping experience more efficient by re-designing stores and reducing SKUs. 

“Drug retailers are feeling the heat from mass merchandisers and other retail channels.  Look for drug stores to innovate and evolve with more in-store clinics, competitive store brands, and expansion beyond traditional health & beauty categories,” said Tom Pirovano, Director of Industry Insights at Nielsen.

Other drug store facts:

• Drug store shoppers spend nearly twice as much on cigarettes than on cold/allergy remedies.
• Drug stores dominate all channels in the sale of contraceptives, generating 64 percent of sales in the category.
• The two highest growth categories in terms of share for the drug channel are tobacco and feminine hygiene.
• The category that has the highest drug channel private label share: canned nuts (64%).
• The Cleveland market has the strongest drug store channel representing 8.6 percent of total sales compared to 3.8 percent for the U.S. as a whole. Miami, Boston, New York and Sacramento round out the top five.
• Denver, Salt Lake City, Portland, OR have lower-than-average sales in the drug store channel
• Drug stores skew to African Americans, households without kids, lower incomes and older households than other channels
• Where one lives plays a huge role in the channels one shops: those living in cosmopolitan centers and struggling urban cores spend more of their money in drug stores than those in suburbia or rural communities.

Chain stores, such as 7-Eleven and BP, account for more than 52 percent of C-Stores, while independently owned stores make up the balance.  That said, only 14 percent of C-Stores are from chains with more than 500 stores; the rest of the chain stores are part of local or regional companies such as WaWa, Get Go and Nice N Easy.

So what makes one store more successful than another? Execution.  “According to Nielsen research, consumers want convenience, obviously, but they also want a clean, organized store and the ability to check-out quickly,” said Tom Pirovano, Director of Industry Insights at Nielsen.

C-Stores dominate a number of high-volume categories such as tobacco (85% share of all channels), ice (57%) and beer (56%) and they outsell food, drug and mass merchandisers (including Walmart) combined in these categories.  C-Store sales of tobacco and beverages generate more than $90 billion annually.

A Convenience Store News Nielsen survey found that customers want their stores to offer gas, snacks and prepared food, a category that has shown growth as the quality of those food service items has improved.  Doughnuts and muffins are the top prepared food category, followed by sandwiches and hot dogs.

“Stores that offer prepared food that looks fresh and smells good and cross merchandise those with other items are likely to hit a homerun,” continued Pirovano.

Despite their seeming ubiquity, the challenges facing the C-Store channel are numerous: rising credit card fees, competition from small format groceries, a desire for healthier foods and competition from club and mass retailers selling gas are just a few of the issues C-Store owners face.

“The key to success is innovation.  C-Store retailers need to constantly fine-tune their offerings in the face of increased competition from other channels while never taking their eyes off the basics of cleanliness and efficiency,” said Pirovano.

Other C-Store Facts:

• Texas leads the nation with more than 14,000 stores, followed by California and Florida
• Nevada showed the most growth in the last year, with 31 new stores coming online
• C-Stores skew to African Americans, smaller households without kids, lower-income households and single males.
• Seattle, Dallas/Ft. Worth and San Francisco lead metro areas with the most C-Store growth, while Miami, Houston and Tampa showed the steepest declines.