<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; television advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/television-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Thrill of the Chase: Best-Liked Ads of Q3 2011 Depict Pursuit of Love</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most liked ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Q3 2011, the best-liked TV creatives for men and women were all about the chase, as Nielsen research showed both genders enjoyed ads that represented the often elusive pursuit of love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Q3 2011, the best-liked TV creatives for men and women were all about the chase, as Nielsen research showed both genders enjoyed ads that represented the often elusive pursuit of love. For women, the most-liked ad was for Chevrolet Cruze Eco in which a man&#8217;s &#8220;Janet Marry Me&#8221; plane banner kept flying behind buildings, foiling his marriage proposal attempts.  Guys also showed their sentimental side; their favorite was a Staples commercial where Rico Rodriguez (known for his role on ABC&#8217;s Modern Family) fails to get a girl&#8217;s phone number with his new pens.</p>
<p>Ads for charitable causes also made their mark on TV viewers in Q3. Overall, MasterCard&#8217;s Stand Up to Cancer ads, featuring Ray Romano, took the top spot.  The Yoplait &#8220;Save Lids to Save Lives&#8221; commercial also popped out as a well-liked ad overall.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/TopAds.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29913" title="TopAds" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/TopAds.gif" alt="TopAds" width="575" height="1200" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Mainstream: 28% of TV Watching Spent on LGBT-Inclusive Shows</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/the-new-mainstream-28-of-tv-watching-spent-on-lgbt-inclusive-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/the-new-mainstream-28-of-tv-watching-spent-on-lgbt-inclusive-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Audiences and advertisers alike are flocking to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT)-inclusive programs. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Audiences and advertisers alike are flocking to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT)-inclusive programs. Representing 24 percent of broadcast primetime scripted and reality shows last season, these series garnered 28 percent of broadcast primetime TV viewing and 22 percent of ad dollars, according to Nielsen data. According to the Gay &amp; Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), the presence of regularly-appearing LGBT characters accounted for 3.9 percent of all scripted series regular characters during the 2010-2011 season, reaching a record high.</p>
<p><strong>Scripted Shows for Teens, Realities for Older Females</strong><br />
Teen and Millennial viewers in particular dedicated over a third of their primetime scripted TV viewing to series depicting at least one regular or recurring LGBT character.* Females 50 and older were attracted to realities featuring LGBT cast-members, hosts, judges and/or competitors, dedicating a significant share of their reality TV time to these programs.* Overall, one in four scripted series and one in five reality shows were LGBT-inclusive.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">“The inclusion of LGBT characters on TV more accurately portrays the diverse and multicultural society we live in by encompassing all segments of the population,&#8221; said Matt O’Grady, EVP, Audience Measurement, Nielsen.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-2.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29714  aligncenter" title="LGBT-Inclusive Programs Share" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-2.png" alt="LGBT-Inclusive Programs Share" width="513" height="606" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>LGBT-Inclusive Shows Attract Dynamic Audiences</strong><br />
Audiences for LGBT-inclusive shows were as diverse as the programs themselves, though certain demographics appear to have been more exposed to LGBT images. Within the 25-49 age demographic, LGBT-inclusive programs (and its advertisers) were most likely to reach:</p>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>College-educated white females</li>
<li>Small white collar households</li>
<li>Budding families (those with 3 or fewer      members)</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">Non-white, professional Millennials without children also tended to watch LGBT-inclusive shows more frequently than primetime in general.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">LGBT-Inclusive characters were incorporated into shows that skewed towards Eastern and Pacific viewers and were less watched by Midwesterners. This differential was most pronounced among 18-24 year olds in the Midwest, especially when compared to 18-24 year olds in other regions of the U.S.<strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Motion Pictures and Department Stores Drive Advertising</strong><br />
LGBT characters and plots were woven into some of the most popular broadcast primetime programs last season, and advertisers were investing their budgets there too. Motion pictures and department stores were the top categories that drove advertising on LGBT-inclusive programming, devoting 28.3 percent and 27.6 percent of their ad dollars, respectively.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Credit cards, telephone, and tech companies also spent a significant share of ad dollars with LGBT-friendly programs. Of the top 10 overall advertising categories, retail and pharmaceuticals dedicated less of their ad budgets to these shows than they did on the average for all categories.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29715 alignnone" title="Top Ad Spending Categories" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/lgbt-1.png" alt="Top Ad Spending Categories" width="407" height="439" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left; font-size:11px;">*This list was determined by GLAAD in conjunction with their Where We  Are On TV Report: 2010-2011 Season, and includes scripted programs such as Modern Family, Grey’s Anatomy, The Office, 90210, Glee and House, as well as reality shows such as Dancing with the Stars and Big Brother 12. GLAAD’s Where We Are on TV Report: 2011-2012 is now available at <a href="http://www.glaad.org" target="_blank">www.glaad.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/the-new-mainstream-28-of-tv-watching-spent-on-lgbt-inclusive-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research Shows Link Between Online Brand Metrics and Offline Sales</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/research-shows-link-between-online-brand-metrics-and-offline-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/research-shows-link-between-online-brand-metrics-and-offline-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that advertisers looking to build their brands online will need to look beyond traditional web metrics to determine if their investments are paying off. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisers looking to build their brands online will need to look beyond traditional web metrics to determine if their investments are paying off, according to a recent study by Nielsen. In a new report, <a href="http://nielsen.com//content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/online-advertising-brand-building.html" target="_blank">Beyond Clicks and Impressions: Examining the Relationship Between Online Advertising and Brand Building</a>, there is emerging evidence that brand metrics – which show attitudinal response to online campaigns – can predict offline sales. The research further shows that there’s virtually no relationship between click-through rates and brand opinion or offline sales.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29331" title="brand-effect-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-1.png" alt="brand-effect-1" width="575" height="397" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29334" title="brand-effect-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-2.png" alt="brand-effect-2" width="575" height="450" /></a></p>
<p>In the study, Nielsen examined how exposure to Internet ad campaigns influenced brand measures such as ad recall and likeability, and whether the consumer said they were more likely to purchase the product after viewing the ad. The analysis showed that online ads do, on average, succeed in influencing brand engagement and opinion, particularly for ad recall and message association. However, the degree of positive brand impact largely depends on the strength of the ad itself.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29335" title="brand-effect-3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-3.png" alt="brand-effect-3" width="575" height="348" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-4.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29337" title="brand-effect-4" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-4.png" alt="brand-effect-4" width="575" height="395" /></a></p>
<p>The study then connected brand engagement results with actual offline sales measured by Nielsen. While based on a small number of cases to-date, the research showed that campaigns in which consumers reported an increase in purchase intent after viewing an online ad also showed a boost in offline product sales. Cases with flat purchase intent showed no significant change in sales.</p>
<p>Additionally, the research showed that the click-through rate for a given ad campaign showed no connection to sales lift and no measure of whether the message resonated with consumers.</p>
<ul>
<li>For more on these findings, download <a href="http://nielsen.com//content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/online-advertising-brand-building.html">Beyond Clicks and Impressions: Examining the Relationship Between Online Advertising and Brand Building</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/research-shows-link-between-online-brand-metrics-and-offline-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact Sheet: U.S. Advertising Spend and Effectiveness</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fact-sheet-u-s-advertising-spend-and-effectiveness/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fact-sheet-u-s-advertising-spend-and-effectiveness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Nielsen advertising fact sheet details ad spend and effectiveness trends, as well as the latest insights on branded entertainment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the ever-changing media landscape, consumers&#8217; growing choice of platforms and media content makes it harder for advertisers to reach their desired audience. With an array of options relative investing marketing dollars, advertisers are looking to better understand and accurately measure the impact of their advertising on brand and sales goals. A new Nielsen <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/advertising-spend-effectiveness-q1-2011.html">advertising fact sheet</a><strong> </strong>details ad spend and effectiveness trends, as well as the latest insights on branded entertainment.</p>
<p><strong>Key Takeaways:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Television advertising surpassed $18 billion in the first quarter of 2011, growing almost nine percent versus the same period in 2010.</li>
<li>On average, ads that aired during the Super Bowl were 58 percent more memorable than all commercials that aired during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.</li>
<li>Recommendations from personal acquaintances was cited as the most trusted form of advertisement by U.S. Internet consumers (76%). Forty-nine percent said they trusted consumer opinions posted online.</li>
<li>Mobile advertising is increasingly finding its way into mobile apps, with teenagers being much more receptive than their elders. 58 percent of teens say they “always” or “sometimes” look at mobile ads.</li>
<li>Across 12 broadcast and major cable networks in primetime, there were 5,381 major product placements in 2010, up 22 percent since 2006.</li>
<li>Reality shows dominated broadcast and cable with the most placement occurrences in the first quarter of 2011, accounting for over half of all placements. While consumers can better remember the brands of placements during Sitcoms, placements in Reality programs are the most effective at positively impacting viewer opinion of the integrated brand.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ad-spend-q111.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27900" title="advertising spend" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ad-spend-q111.png" alt="advertising spend" width="551" height="348" /></a></p>
<p>For more charts and trends, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/advertising-spend-effectiveness-q1-2011.html">Trends in Advertising Spend and Effectiveness</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fact-sheet-u-s-advertising-spend-and-effectiveness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl Ads Score Big in List of Most-Liked Ads of Q1 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-ads-score-big-in-list-of-most-liked-ads-of-q1-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-ads-score-big-in-list-of-most-liked-ads-of-q1-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Volkswagen’s Little Darth Vader ad, where a small boy is stunned by his powers, was not only a standout commercial in this year’s Super Bowl, but it also took the top spot among Most Liked new ads of the entire first quarter 2011. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volkswagen’s Little Darth Vader ad, where a small boy is stunned by his powers, was not only a standout commercial in this year’s Super Bowl, but it also took the top spot among Most Liked new ads of the entire first quarter 2011.</p>
<p>A Nielsen analysis of the top ads debuting in Q1 of this year revealed that, while Super Bowl ads were among some of the best liked commercials (four of the top five Most Liked ads appeared in the big game), several other creatives managed to break through the clutter as well.</p>
<p>In fact, overall, six out of 10 Most-Liked ads were not shown in the Super Bowl, including a 30-second spot from M&amp;M, which ranked third on the list.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Nielsen Top 10 Most Liked Ads: Q1 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description / Duration</th>
<th> Likeability Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Passat &#8212; Little Darth Vader starts car (:30)</td>
<td>232</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Man licks cheese crumbs off of coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>227</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>M&amp;M</td>
<td>Convenience store robber threatens to eat M&amp;M hostage if demands are not met (:30)</td>
<td>225</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Housesitter brings grandpa back to life (:30)</td>
<td>217</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>NFL</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Montage of people watching football on well-known classic TV shows  (:60)</td>
<td>214</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Snickers</td>
<td>Peanut Butter Squared &#8212; Woman asks sharks which human tasted better (:30)</td>
<td>211</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Dove</td>
<td>Woman leaves chocolate gifts for Valentine&#8217;s Day, including one for herself. (:15)</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Canada Dry</td>
<td>People pull roots, cans of soda, and a soda machine out of the ground (:30)</td>
<td>207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>General Electric</td>
<td>Ecomagination &#8212; Animated elephant dances in jungle (:30)</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>M&amp;M</td>
<td>Pretzel &#8212; Patrick Warburton turns into a pretzel M&amp;M after eating them (:15)</td>
<td>205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company: Only new ad executions considered, airing from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011. The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those who remembered the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average.  For example, with a recall index of 232 the top ranked Volkswagen ad has proven to be 2.31 times as memorable as the average new commercial during the past quarter.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>For the most memorable ads, the high profile platform provided by the Super Bowl seemed to have more of an impact. Seven of the top 10 ads with the strongest Brand Recall score came from the game. The top commercial featured a Western backdrop, where a cowboy demands Budweiser when he enters a saloon. Overall, the ads with the highest Brand Recall significantly outperformed the average commercial in the first quarter of 2011 – they were more than twice as memorable as other new creatives.</p>
<p>Two Super Bowl ads scored on both Brand Recall and Likeability: a Doritos ad where a man licks crumbs off his co-worker’s fingers (#2 Most-Liked, #3 Most-Recalled), and an NFL montage (#5 Most-Liked, #7 Most-Recalled) ranked in the top 10 on both lists.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Nielsen Top 10 Most Recalled Ads: Q1 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description / Duration</th>
<th> Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Cowboy in Western saloon sings (:60)</td>
<td>232</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Pug knocks down door after boyfriend taunts with chips (:30)</td>
<td>227</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Man licks cheese crumbs off of coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>225</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Yoplait</td>
<td>Light &#8212; Woman talks on phone about her diet; husband searches for treats (:15)</td>
<td>217</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Cheez-It</td>
<td>Wheel of cheese tells immature jokes and is deemed unready to be eaten (:30)</td>
<td>214</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Pepsi Max</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Pepsi Max &#8212; Soda cans shoot out of cooler and hit bullies (:30)</td>
<td>211</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>NFL</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Montage of people watching football on classic TV shows  (:60)</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>GoDaddy.com</td>
<td>GoDaddy.co &#8212; New spokesperson Joan Rivers is revealed (:30)</td>
<td>207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Head &amp; Shoulders</td>
<td>Itchy Scalp Care &#8212; Woman scratches her scalp on a date and messes up her hairstyle (:30)</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Bud Light &#8212; Dogs work at party (:30)</td>
<td>205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company: Only new ad executions considered, airing from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011. The Recall Score is the percentage of TV viewers who can remember within 24 hours the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Recall Index). 100 equals average.  For example, with a recall index of 232 the top ranked Budweiser ad has proven to be 2.32 times as memorable as the average new commercial during the past quarter.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-ads-score-big-in-list-of-most-liked-ads-of-q1-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official World Cup Sponsors Show Higher Effectiveness with TV Ads</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/official-world-cup-sponsors-show-higher-effectiveness-with-tv-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/official-world-cup-sponsors-show-higher-effectiveness-with-tv-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although neither the the USA or England teams remain contenders for the World Cup, TV advertisers in the U.S. and U.K. appear to have scored with viewers...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although neither the the USA or England teams remain contenders for the World Cup, TV advertisers in the U.S. and U.K. appear to have scored with viewers during the first half of the tournament, according to a Nielsen analysis of advertising effectiveness in the two countries.</p>
<p>In the U.S, Nielsen monitored national advertising during weekend ABC and ESPN matches, plus all Team USA matches from June 11-26, and found that official sponsors connected better with World Cup fans. Nielsen data showed that the five primary World Cup TV sponsors (Adidas, AT&amp;T, Budweiser, Hyundai and Sony) generated 55% higher Net Likeability on average compared to commercials from other, non-sponsor World Cup advertisers. The sponsors also generated 16% higher Brand Recall on average for their World Cup in-game/in-studio elements, such as the Hyundai “Halftime Report” and the Adidas &#8220;First Half Highlights,&#8221; versus their typical in-game sponsorship performance in other sporting events.</p>
<p>“Nielsen data clearly shows an advantage for U.S. sponsors who have had an expanded presence in the matches with in-game or in-studio elements,” said Alan Gould, CEO of Nielsen IAG, which measures TV advertising effectiveness and program engagement. “The presence of these elements, which are integrated seamlessly into programming, is likely bolstering the effectiveness of these brands&#8217; traditional TV commercials that air around the matches.”</p>
<p>In examining ad performance of new campaigns launched by World Cup sponsors and non-sponsors since the start of the tournament, Nielsen data also showed that ads from Budweiser, M&amp;M’s, Macy’s, Sony and Hyundai scored highest in Net Likeability, with the greatest percentage of World Cup TV viewers recalling the commercial, the advertised brand, and reporting to like the ad &#8220;a lot&#8221; or &#8220;somewhat.”</p>
<p>Even World Cup fans are not immune to the gender divide as Nielsen ad effectiveness data shows that some World Cup ads seemed to be more engaging to certain genders in the U.S. While ads for Nike and Hyundai generated the high Net Likeability for female World Cup TV viewers, ads from Adidas and Cisco were hits with male audiences.</p>
<p><strong>Both Sponsors and Non-sponsors Faring Well across the Pond<br />
</strong>The World Cup, which proved to be a big draw for U.K. viewers, also provided an advertiser-friendly environment for sponsors and non-sponsors alike in the U.K.  Nielsen IAG monitored advertising during World Cup programming on ITV1 in the U.K., including game, pre-game and post-game analysis from June 11-22, and found that, among new ad executions airing since the start of the tournament, ads for BT Telecommunications, Churchill Insurance, The Sun, Renault Automobiles and Carling all made the top 5 in Brand Recall. Among the top 5, only two – The Sun and Carling – are World Cup-themed.</p>
<p>A look at all World Cup-themed ads, including those that began airing during the run-up to the tournament, showed that England national team sponsor, Nationwide Building Society, topped the list in Brand Recall, followed by two ads from WeBuyAnyCar.com and the commercials from The Sun and Carling. The spot from Nationwide Building Society also ranked in the top 5 most liked ads, but it was a commercial for Magner’s Irish Cider that scored highest in Net Likeability, with a 22% higher than average number of viewers reporting that they recalled the ad, the advertised brand, and reporting to like the ad &#8220;a lot&#8221; or &#8220;somewhat.”</p>
<p>Official World Cup sponsor Visa, which decided to air World Cup TV ads outside the U.S. only, also saw a significant lift in Likeability within World Cup programming. Visa’s World Cup-themed credit card ad scored a 100% increase in Likeability when it aired during World Cup programming, versus airings for the same ad during non-sports programming. Nationwide Building Society received a nearly 80% lift in Brand Recall and a 95% increase in Likeability for its themed ad during World Cup programming versus when it aired in non-sports programming.</p>
<p>“While official sponsors are seeing their investments pay off as viewers are showing they’re receptive to the advertisements and that the messages are resonating well with the audience, there are clearly also significant opportunities for other advertisers to capitalize on the engaging environment that a major event such as the World Cup provides,” said Gould.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/official-world-cup-sponsors-show-higher-effectiveness-with-tv-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Most Liked and Most Recalled Ads: May 10-June 6</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-liked-and-most-recalled-ads-may-10-june-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-liked-and-most-recalled-ads-may-10-june-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ad from Target that tied into the finale of LOST and a summer-themed Walmart ad were the most liked and most recalled ads of the most recent period tracked by Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ad from Target that tied into the finale of LOST and a summer-themed Walmart ad were the most liked and most recalled ads of the most recent period tracked by Nielsen.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="4">	Top Ten Most Liked New Ads, May 10, 2010 to June 6, 2010							</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	RANK	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Description	</th>
<th>	Likeability Index	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Black smoke emerges from jungle; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme; First Alert smoke detector	</td>
<td>	209	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Aflac	</td>
<td>	Animated kids play roughly with toys; if you get hurt, you get paid cash fast; Toy Story 3 	</td>
<td>	151	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	McDonald&#8217;s	</td>
<td>	Shrek Forever After Glasses&#8211;Donkey tells Shrek that outside forces are making him crazy 	</td>
<td>	148	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	Ford	</td>
<td>	Fiesta&#8211;People with arrows highlight gas mileage; 40 more movies, concerts, ballgames	</td>
<td>	139	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Walmart	</td>
<td>	Mom let me show you the coolest rollback in the store; what&#8217;s better than a dessert on rollback?	</td>
<td>	134	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Johnsonville Sausage	</td>
<td>	Man wrestles with children at summer barbecue, then runs to grill and eats sausage 	</td>
<td>	124	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	Chevrolet	</td>
<td>	Everyone deserves a car they can count on; images of cars in testing; Red X engineers obsessed with quality 	</td>
<td>	122	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Visa	</td>
<td>	Debit&#8211;Characters from Toy Story see Buzz in shopping basket and try to save him from getting bought	</td>
<td>	121	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Hebrew National	</td>
<td>	Hot dogs made with 100% kosher beef; woman dressed as royalty renames them &#8220;Queen Elizabeefs&#8221;	</td>
<td>	120	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Cadillac	</td>
<td>	CTS V&#8211;World&#8217;s fastest production sedan; 0-60 in 3.9 secs; car accelerates on street at night	</td>
<td>	114	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">	Source: The Nielsen Company<br />	<br />
		Only new ad executions considered, airing weeks of May 10 to June 6, 2010. The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Likeability index of 209 the top-ranked Target ad has proven to be 109% better-liked than the average new commercial during the past four-week period.  	</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart -->	</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="4">	Top Ten Most Recalled New Ads, May 10, 2010 to June 6, 2010							</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	RANK	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Description	</th>
<th>	Likeability Index	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Walmart	</td>
<td>	Watch Mr. Rollback drop the price of your summer cookout; Heinz ketchup, Sara Lee hot dog buns	</td>
<td>	241	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Pantene 	</td>
<td>	Stacy London announces the first reality hair star winner during &#8220;live&#8221; commercial 	</td>
<td>	224	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Wild boar runs through jungle; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme; Kraft Original Barbecue Sauce	</td>
<td>	210	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Black smoke emerges from jungle; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme; First Alert smoke detector	</td>
<td>	209	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Man types numbers into computer; execute button doesn&#8217;t work; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme	</td>
<td>	207	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Subway	</td>
<td>	Man eating a burger falls through hammock; try a Fresh Fit meal 	</td>
<td>	200	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	Verizon	</td>
<td>	Droid&#8211;Smart phone can see through walls, locate restaurants and shops though viewfinder	</td>
<td>	193	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Domino&#8217;s	</td>
<td>	Workers try to get Bill Johnson to try their pizza; 2 medium, 2 topping pizzas for $5.99 each	</td>
<td>	187	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Victoria&#8217;s Secret	</td>
<td>	Biofit 7-Way&#8211;One bra that you can wear seven ways; different strap arrangements shown	</td>
<td>	186	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	AT&#038;T	</td>
<td>	Huge sheets of orange cloth cover buildings and landmarks across the country	</td>
<td>	182	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">	Source: The Nielsen Company<br />	<br />
		Only new ad executions considered, airing weeks of May 10 to June 6, 2010. The Recall Score is the percentage of TV viewers who can recall within 24 hours the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Recall Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a recall index of 241 the top ranked Walmart ad has proven to be over 2.4 times as memorable as the average new commercial during the past four-week period. 							</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart -->	</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-liked-and-most-recalled-ads-may-10-june-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restaurants Serve Up Ads in 2009, Plus Top Cities for Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/restaurants-serve-up-ads-in-2009-plus-top-cities-for-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/restaurants-serve-up-ads-in-2009-plus-top-cities-for-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Claritas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Service Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurant Growth Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While advertising as a whole took a hit in 2009, the nation’s Quick Service Restaurants ramped up spending during the year by 2% over 2008, according to The Nielsen Company. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While advertising as a whole took a hit in 2009, the nation’s Quick Service Restaurants ramped up spending during the year by 2% over 2008, according to The Nielsen Company.  Fast food restaurants spent almost $4.1 billion during the year, with nearly 36% being spent on Spot TV, followed by Network and Cable TV.</p>
<p>The sector spent $84.7 million on African-American media during the year, and increase of 18% from the year before, cable TV showed significant growth – up 42% &#8212; while network TV dropped more than 70%.</p>
<p><strong>Top 10 Media Types for Quick Service Restaurant Advertising</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Media Type</th>
<th>Jan-Dec 2009 ($ millions)</th>
<th>% of Total Ad Spending</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot TV 210 DMAs</td>
<td>1,475.5</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network TV</td>
<td>934.8</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cable TV</td>
<td>868.3</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Network TV</td>
<td>203.0</td>
<td>5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot Radio</td>
<td>183.2</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Outdoor</td>
<td>149.0</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Magazine</td>
<td>84.2</td>
<td>2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Syndicated TV</td>
<td>80.0</td>
<td>2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Internet</td>
<td>58.9</td>
<td>1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network Radio</td>
<td>18.1</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On the Wait Service side of dining, ad spend fell 4% in 2009 to $1.56 billion.  More than a quarter of that was spent on Network TV, followed by Spot and Cable TV.  &#8220;Local Newspapers&#8221; was the fourth largest category, with $124 million being spent, compared to just $14.8 million in that category for quick service restaurants.  For Wait Service Restaurants, all categories – except for cable TV – registered a decline in spending during the year.</p>
<p><strong>Top Cities for Restaurants</strong><br />
Meanwhile, Nielsen Claritas released its annual Restaurant Growth Index (RGI) report, which found that the top city for dining out was Fort Walton Beach, Florida, which scored an RGI of 577, beating Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, which claimed the top spot for the past two years.  Despite leading the pack, Fort Walton Beach’s score was well below Myrtle Beach’s scores for the previous two years (735 and 632) reflecting the economic turmoil in 2009.  The average index score among markets in the top 10 was off 40 points from the previous year.  Nationally, restaurant sales fell more than $5 billion in 2009, which translates to both diminished sales per capita and per restaurant outlet.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Metro Area</th>
<th>RGI</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Fort Walton Beach, FL</td>
<td>577</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Myrtle Beach, SC</td>
<td>469</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Ocean City, NJ</td>
<td>411</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ</td>
<td>330</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Flagstaff, AZ</td>
<td>329</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Honolulu, HI</td>
<td>308</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Las Vegas-Paradise, NV</td>
<td>296</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Barnstable Town, MA</td>
<td>278</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Springfield, IL</td>
<td>274</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Jackson, TN</td>
<td>274</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The RGI tends to favor markets with significant number of out-of-town visitors, such as vacation destinations and college towns.  Springfield, Illinois may be the most surprising entrant to the list, but if one considers the fact that it is a state capital with a large number of state employees, legislators and lobbyists need somewhere to eat, its inclusion makes more sense.</p>
<p>“Obviously, the economy has had a significant effect on the restaurant industry as money-conscious consumers cooked dinner and ate at home more frequently.  But there were a number of markets that were bucking the trend with annual sales increases during the year, notably Barnstable Town on Cape Cod, which jumped into the number eight position, and Napa, California, which climbed 20 spots to number twelve after having fallen to 32<sup>nd</sup> place last year,” said Matt Wolff, AVP, Retail Practice Manager at Nielsen Claritas.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/0410-FEAT_RGI_150.pdf">full article</a> from Restaurant Business magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/restaurants-serve-up-ads-in-2009-plus-top-cities-for-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Act Now! The Rise of Direct Response Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/act-now-the-rise-of-direct-response-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/act-now-the-rise-of-direct-response-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infomercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While global ad spend has softened in many sectors, one format, the direct response ad, or infomercial, has seen a remarkable 18% growth in total units in the U.S. since 2007 according to Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While global ad spend has softened in many sectors, one format, the direct response ad, or infomercial, has seen a remarkable 18% growth in total units in the U.S. since 2007 according to Nielsen. In total, direct response comprises 14% of all TV advertising, a figure that may continue to grow as blankets with sleeves, super absorbent towels and language learning CDs gain a mixture of mainstream awareness and web virality. </p>
<p>An analysis of a single week of all direct response national TV advertising shows that 88% of all U.S. TV Homes (or 101 million homes) tuned to at least one national direct response ad &#8212; on average those homes saw 32 such ads during the week tracked. Over 15,500 DR commercials units aired across national TV for the week we reviewed.  </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/direct-response.png"><img src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/direct-response.png" alt="direct-response" title="direct-response" width="418" height="275" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21411" /></a></p>
<p>“One factor that makes direct response so attractive to advertisers is the ability to get that direct, and almost immediate feedback of how well the ad performed,” said Kevin Svenningsen, SVP Media Tracking Services, The Nielsen Company. “When we overlay our media tracking services on top of that, we give advertisers verification that the campaign aired as planned as well as access to critical performance metrics.”</p>
<blockquote><p>In the spirit of direct response: call Nielsen at: 1 800-864-1224 within 30 minutes of reading this article and we’ll explain how <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/forms/contact_forms/Product_Families_Nielsen_Media_Tracking">Nielsen tracks the impact of direct response advertising</a>!!! </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/act-now-the-rise-of-direct-response-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amid Downturn, Asia Pacific Leads Global Advertising Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/amid-downturn-asia-pacific-leads-global-advertising-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/amid-downturn-asia-pacific-leads-global-advertising-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Ad View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising spend was hard hit in 2009 – down 1.6 percent compared to 2008, according to Nielsen’s Global AdView Pulse, which reports advertising across 27 markets in Asia, North America, Europe and Africa.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising spend was hard hit in 2009 – down 1.6 percent compared to 2008, according to Nielsen’s Global AdView Pulse, which reports advertising across 27 markets in Asia, North America, Europe and Africa.</p>
<p>The overall outcome of 2009 advertising is the result of totally  different behaviors within the regions. Asia Pacific inverted the  downturn quite early in the year and, since quarter two, has been the  only region to show growth compared to 2008 (+6.6%). Europe, which is  still below the levels of the previous year (-4.9%), showed improvement  in the second half of the year and moved to the positive side of the  scale in the last quarter of the year. North America shows the largest  percentage decline versus the previous year (-9.4%) and, though the  percentage decrease is more contained in the last quarter, the level of  expenditure has not matched that of 2008 yet.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/regional-change.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21050" title="regional-change" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/regional-change.png" alt="regional-change" width="575" height="312" /></a></p>
<p>The declines reported quarter after quarter however, were gradually more contained, with the second half of the year giving more significant signs of improvement and the last quarter of 2009 actually showed growth.</p>
<p>“Despite ad spend declining overall in 2009, the final part of the year showed growth – a good sign of things to come this year,&#8221; said Ben van der Werf, Managing Director of Nielsen Global AdView. &#8220;But, while the first half of 2009 compares to a fairly strong, pre-crisis beginning of 2008, the second half of the year compares to a weaker end of 2008, which may &#8216;inflate&#8217; the growth. In addition, having to react to the loss of advertising revenue, many media owners started applying much more aggressive discount policies which may not always be reflected in the trends reported at rate-card prices. If it is true therefore that signs of recovery can be seen, there should be more care in evaluating the extent of such recovery.”</p>
<p>With this in mind, it is clear that the last six months of the year started to provide some relief to the industry, with Television benefiting the most. Radio managed to close the year with the same amount of ad revenue gathered in 2008. Print on the other hand had the worst of the four major media types, with Magazines taking the bigger hit. Though not included in the global trends, Internet was the only media type to see ad revenue growth in the majority of the countries where it is tracked, and was often the only one to register a positive trend when the more traditional media suffered declines.</p>
<p><strong>Despite crisis, some sectors increased ad budgets</strong><br />
With the economic crisis impacting more or less all industries, the advertisers have been cutting ad budgets throughout the year, no matter which industry branch they belong to. Three of the eleven reported macro-sectors have however spent overall more than they did in 2008, while all others have been reducing their advertising spend. FMCG (+10.6%), Healthcare (+6.1%) and Distribution Channels (+4.2%) are the three larger contributors to the growth. Automotive (-15.1%), Clothing &amp; Accessories (-11.6%) and Financial (-11.4%) are on the other hand showing the largest percentage decreases and report declines in all regions. Telecommunications showed growth in the North American region, but this is not sufficient to balance up the advertising cut backs in Asia Pacific and Europe. Durables and Entertainment are investing more than they did last year in Asia Pacific and cut their budget in Europe less than they did in North America.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/meda-by-region.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21051" title="meda-by-region" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/meda-by-region.png" alt="meda-by-region" width="544" height="325" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/global-sector-change.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21052" title="global-sector-change" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/global-sector-change.png" alt="global-sector-change" width="575" height="525" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Slight improvement in the fourth quarter</strong><br />
The last three months of the year did bring some relief. The advertising market closed with a 4.5 percent growth versus the same quarter 2008 and marks the only positive sign of the whole year. This path is common to the majority of the countries. However, some major markets like USA, Japan, Italy and Spain are still showing percentage declines, though more contained than in the previous three quarters. The global 4.5 percent growth is driven by Asia Pacific (+12.0%) and Europe (+2.6%), while the North American advertising spend is still below the levels of the last three months of 2008. All media types except for Magazines benefit from the growth and show positive trends compared to the last three months of 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/amid-downturn-asia-pacific-leads-global-advertising-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

