<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Super Bowl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/super-bowl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Giants vs Patriots: Playbook for the Social Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30845" title="SuperBowlBuzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz1.gif" alt="SuperBowlBuzz" width="575" height="1008" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png">(click for high resolution image)</a></p>
<h3>Patriots have more online visitors, but Giants fans run up web stats</h3>
<p>During the run up to the playoffs in December 2011, the Patriots had 644,000 unique visitors to their official website, topping the Giants’ 574,000 visitors. However, Giants fans were more engaged when visiting their team’s website, viewing nearly twice as many pages (17 page views per person) compared to Patriots visitors, and spending over 10 minutes each on average.</p>
<h3>Super Bowl buzz: Giants fans cheer more for team, Tom Brady is MVP of social media</h3>
<p>Fans’ excitement throughout the playoffs carried over to social media. The Giants had more buzz about their team each week, with a 59 percent share of buzz compared to the Patriots’ 41 percent of buzz volume on blogs, message boards/forums, public posts on Twitter and Facebook and online news posts.  But Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady surpassed Giants QB Eli Manning, with nearly double the amount of buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Super Bowl Investment: Ad Spend Trends Over the Past Five Super Bowls</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they get a measurable bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011's Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they tend to get a measurable marketing bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011&#8217;s Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.  In addition, brand awareness for commercials airing during the Super Bowl was up to 275 percent higher than awareness for the same creative during regular programming.</p>
<p><strong>Cost of an Ad</strong><br />
The Super Bowl investment is economically resilient, remaining relatively stable despite fluctuations in the primetime average—and rising consistently over the past five years despite a rocky economy.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif"><img class="size-full wp-image-30807 aligncenter" title="AvgCost-30SecAd" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif" alt="AvgCost-30SecAd" width="278" height="220" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Big Spenders: Automotive Makes a Comeback</strong><br />
2011 was the year of the auto comeback.  Spending on automotive ads far surpassed other categories and more than doubled versus previous years.  Nine different auto brands took center field in the commercial breaks, versus an average of two to four brands in years prior.  Creative quality also improved in 2011, with an unprecedented four auto spots making Nielsen’s annual <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/" target="_self">Most-Liked list</a>.  Chevrolet’s “Wild Ride” garnered the distinction of being the most watched ad of all time, with an estimated 119,628,000 viewers watching its Super Bowl airing.  This year, Chevy is breaking ground again with the Game Time app, which will leverage consumers&#8217; simultaneous cross-screen behavior and reinforce branding from traditional TV advertisements.</p>
<p><strong>Top Five Super Bowl Advertising Categories (2007-2011)</strong><br />
Year Over Year Spend Breakdown (in millions)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30808 aligncenter" title="Top5-SBAdCat" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png" alt="Top5-SBAdCat" width="433" height="728" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Other Spend Trends</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Beer</strong>: Bud Light and Budweiser have dominated the turf when if comes to Super Bowl beer advertising over the past five years.  Consumers have come to expect the fleet of creatives, including the iconic Clydesdale ads.  In 2010 and 2011, other brands like Michelob and Stella Artois came to play.  What can viewers expect this year?</li>
<li><strong>Motion Picture</strong>: Movies have a strong presence in Super Bowl ad lineup, as studios capitalize on the massive audience to parade their best bets for the year.  From 2008-2011, at least one of the top five highest grossing films had a slot in the Super Bowl line up.  Motion picture ads increased after 2008 and have had a consistently strong presence during the game since, reaching ten ads in last year’s game.</li>
<li><strong>Regular Soft Drink</strong>: While fewer Soft Drink ads have traditionally aired during the Super Bowl compared to other categories, they make an impact by creating minute-long spots.</li>
<li><strong>Tortilla Chips</strong>:  Tortilla Chips have emerged as a highly anticipated category of ads, led by the fan created ads.   Last year, three Doritos ads made Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/">Most Liked and Most Remembered list</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrity Ads Among Most Memorable of 2011 Oscar Commercials; Listerine Tops List of Most Watched Ads</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/celebrity-ads-among-most-memorable-of-2011-oscar-commercials-listerine-tops-list-of-most-watched-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/celebrity-ads-among-most-memorable-of-2011-oscar-commercials-listerine-tops-list-of-most-watched-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrities brought out their best on the red carpet for the 83rd Annual Academy Awards and they made their mark in the commercials too. The Nielsen Company analyzed the Top Recalled Ads that aired in this year’s show, and four of them included celebrities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrities brought out their best on the red carpet for the  83rd Annual Academy Awards and they made their mark in the  commercials too. The Nielsen Company analyzed the Top Recalled Ads that  aired in this year’s show, and four of them included celebrities.</p>
<p>Among the most  watched commercials, a Listerine spot with animated Listerine fighters topped  the list with 37,715,000 viewers. The most recalled ad was an M&amp;M’s commercial where a  criminal threatens to eat an animated M&amp;M hostage in a convenience store holdup.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Nielsen Top Ten Most Watched Ads in the Academy Awards, February 27, 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Time of Air (ET)</th>
<th> Brand Description</th>
<th> # of Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>9:08:30 PM</td>
<td>Listerine</td>
<td>37715</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10:57:28 PM</td>
<td>JC    Penney</td>
<td>37126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10:23:40 PM</td>
<td>Hyundai</td>
<td>36831</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10:07:25 PM</td>
<td>JC    Penney</td>
<td>35947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:35:15 PM</td>
<td>JP    Morgan Chase</td>
<td>35653</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>11:08:27 PM</td>
<td>AT&amp;T</td>
<td>35063</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:50:57 PM</td>
<td>Diet    Coke</td>
<td>34474</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:51:27 PM</td>
<td>JC    Penney</td>
<td>34474</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:22:01 PM</td>
<td>Sprint</td>
<td>33885</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:22:31 PM</td>
<td>Hyundai</td>
<td>33885</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>Although the top 10 recalled ads featured a range of categories and advertisers, from automotives to non-profits, one prominent trend was celebrity ads. Best Buy’s Buy Back Program ad, featuring Ozzy Osbourne and Justin Bieber touting 4G, 5G, and 6G phones, was the strongest celebrity ad in terms of brand recall. Consumers also remembered the Venus brand in a commercial with Jennifer Lopez singing, dancing, and chasing her children on the beach. The American Cancer Society ad featuring Celine Dion singing &#8220;Happy Birthday&#8221; was the sixth best recalled spot.  Adrien Brody also did some singing in a Stella Artois ad, where he left women swooning as he serenaded a beer.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Nielsen Top Ten Ads for Brand Recall in the Academy Awards, February 27, 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Description</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>M&amp;M&#8217;s</td>
<td>A criminal threatens to eat candy hostages if demands    are not met (:30)</td>
<td>222</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>AT&amp;T</td>
<td>Man forgets anniversary and makes a reservation on his    phone (:30)</td>
<td>217</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>McDonald&#8217;s</td>
<td>Ronald McDonald House &#8212; Children look for hope inside    Happy Meals (:30)</td>
<td>197</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Best Buy</td>
<td>Buy Back Program &#8212; Ozzy Osbourne and Justin Bieber    present new generations of phones (:30)</td>
<td>191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Venus</td>
<td>Jennifer Lopez explains how every woman has an inner goddess (:30)</td>
<td>180</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>American Cancer Society</td>
<td>Celine Dion sings happy birthday (:30)</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Stella Artois</td>
<td>Adrien Brody sings to a beer while women stare and cry (:30)</td>
<td>141</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Hyundai</td>
<td>Sonata Hybrid &#8212; People use older versions of technology (:30)</td>
<td>135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>AT&amp;T</td>
<td>4G &#8212; A man throws his friend&#8217;s phone from a ski lift (:30)</td>
<td>130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>LivingSocial.com</td>
<td>Couple dines, goes to a salon, and does tango (:30)</td>
<td>129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</p>
<p>Only ad executions from the 2011 Academy Awards considered, excluding movie trailers. The Recall Score is the percentage of TV viewers who can recall within 24 hours the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all ads during the program (Recall Index). 100 equals average.</p>
<p>For example, with a recall index of 222 the top ranked M&amp;M&#8217;s ad has proven to be 2.22 times as memorable as the average 2011 Academy Awards commercial.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Many may have recognized the Best Buy and Stella ads from their premiere in this year’s Super Bowl.  These ads performed significantly better with the Oscars crowd than they did in the Super Bowl.  The Hyundai Sonata commercial with people using older technologies in the modern world also premiered during the Super Bowl and saw a bump as the eighth most effective spot for the Oscars.</p>
<p>LivingSocial.com was the only brand premiering a new ad during the Oscars to crack the top 10.  This spot featured a couple dining, getting a cut at a salon, and taking tango lessons.</p>
<p>Overall, brand recall for this year’s Oscars jumped 9 percent versus last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/celebrity-ads-among-most-memorable-of-2011-oscar-commercials-listerine-tops-list-of-most-watched-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy.com Sees Large Traffic Increase Following Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/godaddy-com-sees-large-traffic-increase-following-super-bowl/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/godaddy-com-sees-large-traffic-increase-following-super-bowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web hosting site GoDaddy.com saw the largest lift in post-Super Bowl traffic, with a 41% increase in unique U.S. visitors during the week following the game compared to the week before.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisers involved in Super Bowl XLV, which saw the Green Bay Packers beat the Pittsburgh Steelers, were no doubt pleased with the news that the game was <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/">the most-watched U.S. telecast of all-time</a>. <span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif';">So did the large viewership have any impact on the number of visitors to their  websites?</span> Nielsen looked at web traffic for the week following the game and compared that to the week&#8217;s traffic leading up to it for a selection of advertisers who aired a TV commercial during the Super Bowl.  The selection of advertisers included all the pure-play online advertisers (e.g. GoDaddy.com) and any “traditional” advertiser (e.g. Volkswagen) whose commercial appeared among the 10 most watched during the telecast.</p>
<p>Of the sites reviewed, web hosting site GoDaddy.com saw the largest lift in post-Super Bowl traffic, with a 41 percent increase in unique U.S. visitors during the week following the game compared to the week before. GoDaddy aired two commercials during the game with their 1st quarter ad starring Joan Rivers as the new GoDaddy spokesperson ranking as the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/">ninth most-recalled commercial of the telecast</a>.</p>
<p>Volkswagen and travel site HomeAway.com were the other two telecast advertisers reviewed who saw double-digit gains in web traffic during the week of February 7, both having a 27 percent increase in unique U.S. visitors.  “Traditional” brand Mercedes-Benz also saw a noticeable uplift of 9 percent.</p>
<p>FOX, the Super Bowl XLV broadcaster, also saw traffic to its site increase by 11 percent to 1.5 million unique U.S. visitors during the week following the game compared to the week before.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-26540" title="Selection of Super Bowl Advertisers w/ Traffic Growth " src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/SuperbowlAdv-BAR-CHART.jpg" alt="Selection of Super Bowl Advertisers w/ Traffic Growth " width="356" height="440" /></p>
<p>On the other hand, when looking at online buzz, Groupon’s ads – a spoof on celebrity charity endorsements –caused plenty of conversation, placing the rookie Super Bowl telecast advertiser as the <a href="http://www.nmincite.com/?p=3444">#5 most buzzed about brand out of all Super Bowl advertisers</a>.  Among the pure-online players, Groupon took the top spot, capturing 10.5 percent of total Super Bowl marketing buzz the day after the game, three times the buzz of GoDaddy, which had the largest increase in web traffic.  Discussion of Groupon continued over the next few days as buzz volume for the advertiser grew as high as 34 percent during the week following the telecast.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-26543" title="Super Bowl XLV Advertiser Buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/SuperbowlAdv_chart3-BUZZ.jpg" alt="Super Bowl XLV Advertiser Buzz" width="575" height="563" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">Methodology: This piece of research covered all the pure-play online advertisers (e.g. GoDaddy.com) and any “traditional” advertiser (e.g. Chevrolet) whose commercial appeared amongst the 10 most-watched during the Super Bowl XLV telecast. The piece measured the number of unique U.S. individuals who visited the advertiser website from a home or work computer between January 31 and February 13.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">Buzz volume is depicted as a percentage of total Super Bowl marketing messages &#8211; any message with mentions of Super Bowl XLV and ad-related terms (e.g. advertiser, commercial, sponsor, campaign, marketer) &#8211; between January 31 and February 13. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/godaddy-com-sees-large-traffic-increase-following-super-bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>African American, Hispanic and Female Viewers Help Drive Super Bowl XLV to Record Levels</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/african-american-hispanic-and-female-viewers-help-drive-super-bowl-xlv-to-record-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/african-american-hispanic-and-female-viewers-help-drive-super-bowl-xlv-to-record-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Record numbers of African American, Hispanic and female viewers helped propel Super Bowl XLV to become the most-watched television program of all time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Record numbers of African American, Hispanic and female viewers helped propel Super Bowl XLV to become the most-watched television program of all time.   About 10 million Hispanic viewers watched the game, up from 8.3 million viewers last year.  The African American audience also increased dramatically, with about 12.5 million African American viewers tuning into the game, compared to the 11.2 million last year.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Super Bowl</th>
<th>African American Audience (000)</th>
<th>Hispanic American Audience (000)</th>
<th>Total Audience (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>XLV</td>
<td>12,508</td>
<td>10,042</td>
<td>111,441</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLIV</td>
<td>11,242</td>
<td>8,275</td>
<td>106,453</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLIII</td>
<td>10,666</td>
<td>7,842</td>
<td>98,716</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company. P2+, Live + Same Day Viewing.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>The NFL Regular Season has seen a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/">steady increase in its female fan base</a> over the years, so it’s not surprising that Super Bowl XLV also generated an increase in female viewers.  About 51.2 million female viewers watched Sunday’s game, compared to 48.5 million female viewers last year.  The Super Bowl continues to be dominated by male viewers, who comprised 54 percent of the audience, but a much higher percentage of women watched the Super Bowl than followed the NFL regular season (when only 33.6 percent of the audience was female).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>NFL Regular Season</th>
<th>Female Viewership (000)</th>
<th>Super Bowl</th>
<th>Female Viewership (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2010</td>
<td>6,0002</td>
<td>XLV</td>
<td>51,176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2009</td>
<td>5,497</td>
<td>XLIV</td>
<td>48,502</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2008</td>
<td>4,801</td>
<td>XLIII</td>
<td>44,247</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company. Live + Same Day Viewing.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>“Historically, sporting events, especially the Super Bowl, have captured a large audiences,” said Pat McDonough, Senior Vice President for Insights and Analysis at Nielsen. “If sports programmers want to grow their viewership, they will need to attract more women, African Americans and Hispanics, who are often underrepresented in the TV audience for many sporting events. This year’s Super Bowl sets a good example of how leagues can build bigger audiences.”</p>
<p>Nielsen data also shows that households with higher incomes are more likely to watch the game.  In fact, as the household income increases, so does the rating.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Household Income</th>
<th>HH Rating</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>&lt;$20,000</td>
<td>33.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$20,000-$29,999</td>
<td>38.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$30,000-$39,999</td>
<td>43.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$40,000-$49,99</td>
<td>46.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$50,000-$59,999</td>
<td>47.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$60,000-$74,999</td>
<td>50.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$75,000-$99,999</td>
<td>54.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$100,000 +</td>
<td>57.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company. Total U.S. Live + Same Day Viewing.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>And like previous Super Bowls, Nielsen data also shows that the age of the viewer matters. Adult viewers are more likely to watch the game, with the highest rating (41.9) coming from the 25-54 viewers.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody></tbody>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Age</th>
<th>Rating</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>P2-11</td>
<td>23.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>P12-17</td>
<td>32.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>P18-49</td>
<td>40.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>P25-54</td>
<td>41.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>P55+</td>
<td>41.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company. Live + Same Day Viewing.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/african-american-hispanic-and-female-viewers-help-drive-super-bowl-xlv-to-record-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Wild Ride&#8217; Most-Watched Ad of All Time while &#8216;Little Darth Vader&#8217; is Super Bowl Favorite</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Super Bowl is perhaps the most important marketing event of the year, as its popularity applies to the commercials as much as the game. In that respect, auto makers were the real winners of this year's Bowl.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Super Bowl continues to draw in more viewers than any other televised event as a de facto, TV-watching American holiday. It’s also perhaps the most important marketing moment of the year, as the popularity of the event applies to the commercials as much as the game itself. For Super Bowl XLV, Nielsen found:</p>
<ul>
<li>Two guys describing a woman’s wild ride in a silver      Chevrolet Camaro was the most watched commercial of all time.  An      estimated 119,628,000 viewers watched the ad, surpassing the previous      record holder, a Doritos commercial from 2010 with 116,231,920 viewers.</li>
<li>The Doritos ad with the pug dog knocking down the door      was the most recalled ad of the game.</li>
<li>The Volkswagen Passat ad, with the little Darth Vader      starting the car, was by far the favorite ad of the game.</li>
</ul>
<p>“The Super Bowl continues to be the advertising industry’s premier event,” said Pat McDonough, Senior Vice President for Insights and Analysis at Nielsen. “No other event allows advertisers to reach nearly 120 million consumers at a single time. And with Super Bowl advertisers adding millions of commercial views through online and social media exposure, they are able to extend their multi-million dollar investments beyond the game itself.”</p>
<p>While marketers can gain insight by understanding how many people watched the Super Bowl, the key to the black box of marketing effectiveness is understanding <em>how </em>and <em>why </em>they watch.  By pairing viewership with qualitative ad effectiveness data, The Nielsen Company has been able to delve deeper to decipher the code to Super Bowl commercial watching.</p>
<p>Many marketers produced memorable commercials reinforcing their existing brand images.  Consumer-created Doritos ads made a strong impression, as all three of the creatives made Nielsen’s Top 10 Most Recalled list. Pepsi, Go-Daddy, and the NFL also had well-recalled ads.</p>
<p>Anheuser-Busch’s most memorable commercials were well-placed, airing in the first half of the Super Bowl when, as Nielsen research has shown, Super Bowl ads are usually the most effective. This year, brand recall was 19 percent higher in the first quarter than in the fourth quarter. In fact, six out of the top ten most recalled commercials this year aired in the first quarter alone. Eight of the top ten were shown before half time.</p>
<table class="chart">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Nielsen&#8217;s Top 10 Most-Recalled Commercials in Super Bowl XLV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Recall Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Description</th>
<th>Game Quarter</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Pug knocks down door (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>179</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Cowboy in Western saloon (:60)</td>
<td>Q2</td>
<td>166</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Man licks cheese crumbs off of coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>159</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Pepsi</td>
<td>Pepsi Max &#8212; Couple on first date (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Pepsi</td>
<td>Pepsi Max &#8212; Soda cans shoot out of cooler (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Snickers</td>
<td>Richard Lewis and Roseanne Barr complain while working (:30)</td>
<td>Q2</td>
<td>149</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Housesitter brings grandpa back to life (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>NFL</td>
<td>TV clips montage (:60)</td>
<td>Q3</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>GoDaddy.com</td>
<td>GoDaddy.co &#8212; New spokesperson Joan Rivers (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>146</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Bud Light &#8212; Kitchen redesigned with a bucket of beer (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>145</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.  The Recall score is the percentage of viewers who can Recall the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Recall Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Recall Index of 179, the Doritos &#8220;Pug&#8221; ad was 79% better-recalled than the average Super Bowl spot.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>While advertisers can strategically place their commercials in certain commercial pods to achieve maximum brand exposure or generate awareness, there is a little more mystery involved when it comes to delivering a likeable commercial.  Many times, the darlings of the Super Bowl attract the most post-Game buzz publicity and attention, supplementing the in-game impact with long term popularity. While the automotive category has traditionally been less effective in persuading consumers to buy based on TV ads, automakers had a strong presence in the top 10 this year.</p>
<p>&#8220;This year&#8217;s Super Bowl was really symbolic of the automotive industry&#8217;s comeback story,&#8221; said David Kaplan, SVP, Advertising Effectiveness for Nielsen. &#8220;Only twice in the last 10 years have we seen the auto category crack the Top 10 best-liked spots, and both times it was with just a single ad. The fact that this year four automotive ads moved into territory normally dominated by beverage and snack food ads indicates that these brands have really raised the bar in terms of creative quality and narratives that resonate with viewers.&#8221;</p>
<table class="chart">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Nielsen&#8217;s Top 10 Most-Liked Commercials in Super Bowl XLV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Likeability Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Description</th>
<th>Game Quarter</th>
<th>Likeability Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>Passat &#8212; Little Darth Vader    starts car (:30)</td>
<td>Q2</td>
<td>186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Bridgestone</td>
<td>Woodchuck saves driver (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>171</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>E*Trade</td>
<td>Baby talks next to sneezing cat    (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>168</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Man licks cheese crumbs off of    coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>159</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Housesitter brings grandpa back to    life (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>151</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>Beetle – Beetle navigates the wild    (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>146</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>NFL</td>
<td>TV clips montage (:60)</td>
<td>Q3</td>
<td>141</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Chrysler</td>
<td>200 &#8212; Eminem represents Detroit (:120)</td>
<td>Q3</td>
<td>138</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Bud Light &#8212; Dogs work at party    (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Audi</td>
<td>A8 &#8212; Men break out of old luxury    (:60)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>Although consumers may face some degree of ad fatigue as the game progresses (hence the decrease in brand recall later in the game), viewership during the game increased. All of this year’s top-viewed ads were seen in the last quarter of the game, with the exception of the NFL ad. These ads were placed at the beginning or end of the commercial breaks in the fourth quarter, when the game was reaching its climax. As more people tuned in to watch the suspense unfold, these ads were able to capitalize on huge exposure.</p>
<table class="chart">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Nielsen&#8217;s Most Watched Commercials in Super Bowl XLV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Time of Air (ET)</th>
<th>Game Quarter</th>
<th>Brand Description</th>
<th># of Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>9:56:21 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>CHEVROLET CAMARO AUTOS</td>
<td>119,628</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:59:31 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>CHEVROLET CRUZE AUTOS</td>
<td>119,333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:21:19 PM</td>
<td>Q3</td>
<td>NATL FOOTBALL LEAGUE    SPORTING ASSN</td>
<td>118,155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:31:38 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>RANGO MOTION    PICTURE</td>
<td>117,565</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:44:00 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>BRIDGESTONE TIRES</td>
<td>117,565</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:44:30 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>GODADDY.COM WEBSITE-INTERNET SVCS</td>
<td>117,565</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10:00:01 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>LIMITLESS MOTION    PICTURE</td>
<td>117,565</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10:00:31 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>SKECHERS SHAPE-UPS    SPORTING FOOTWEAR WOMENS</td>
<td>117,565</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:57:21 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>VERIZON WIRELESS    TELEPH SVCS-WIRELESS WEB ACCESS</td>
<td>116,976</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:45:00 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE    AUTOS</td>
<td>116,092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:45:30 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>FOX  RAISING    HOPE  TV PGM-PRIME-ENT</td>
<td>116,092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:46:30 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>MERCEDES-BENZ AUTOS    &amp; TRUCKS</td>
<td>116,092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:47:30 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>FOX  CHICAGO CODE  TV    PGM-PRIME-ENT</td>
<td>116,092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9:47:40 PM</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>FOX  HOUSE     TV PGM-PRIME-ENT</td>
<td>116,092</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl XLV Most Viewed Telecast in U.S. Broadcast History</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, making it the most watched television program of all time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, surpassing last year’s Super Bowl, and thereby breaking the record, yet again, for the most watched television program of all time in the U.S.  The game was viewed in 53.3 million households, with a preliminary 46.0 U.S. household rating.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Most Watched  Telecasts of All Time (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Avg. # of Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLV</td>
<td>February 6, 2011</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>111,010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td>February 7, 2010</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>106,476</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>M*A*S*H Special</td>
<td>February 28, 1983</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>105,970</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIII</td>
<td>February 1, 2009</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>98,732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLII</td>
<td>February 3, 2008</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>97,448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XXX</td>
<td>January 28, 1996</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>94,076</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>“Super Bowl XLV caps what is arguably the most successful season that any sports league has ever had,” said Pat McDonough,   “The number of people watching NFL games has never been higher, with 24% more people watching the average NFL game this year than just five years ago.  The Super Bowl continues to be in a category of its own, with an appeal that transcends sports and extends even to the commercials.  Because of the cliff-hanger nature of the game, viewers were tuning in until the very end, driving viewing levels to new heights.”</p>
<p>Over the past several years, the NFL has attracted larger audiences by <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/">broadening its appeal to new audiences</a>, including women and Hispanics, by building up high-profile players – especially quarterbacks – to personify the league and by cross-promoting the games across multiple television networks and emerging digital platforms.</p>
<p><strong>Pittsburgh and Milwaukee Lead Local Market viewing</strong><br />
In the local markets, Milwaukee and Pittsburgh were tied, with a 59.7 household rating.  Other high local market ratings include Columbus, OH and Nashville.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top Five Local Markets, Super Bowl XLV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Share</th>
<th>Households (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>87</td>
<td>693</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Milwaukee</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>538</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Columbus, OH</td>
<td>56.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>515</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>564</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>76</td>
<td>388</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chips, Beer and&#8230;Lip Gloss? Which Super Bowl Advertisers Will Drive Consumer Spending?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/chips-beer-and-lip-gloss-which-super-bowl-advertisers-will-drive-consumer-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/chips-beer-and-lip-gloss-which-super-bowl-advertisers-will-drive-consumer-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With sold out ad inventory for this year’s Super Bowl and such a diverse and massive pack of consumers expected to tune in, which advertisers stand the best chance of capturing the audience and getting the greatest return on their investment? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Steelers and Packers prepare to go head to head in Super Bowl XLV, the always anticipated showdown off the field will once again take place as advertisers battle to keep viewers glued to the TV during the commercial breaks.</p>
<p>According to Nielsen, nearly 48 minutes of paid television advertising (including the pre-game kick-off) ran during the 2010 Super Bowl. Last year’s game drew an estimated $219 million in advertising, trumping total regular season ad spend for most other major sports last year, excluding football. With sold out ad inventory for this year’s Super Bowl and such a diverse and massive pack of consumers expected to tune in, which advertisers stand the best chance of capturing the audience and getting the greatest return on their investment?</p>
<p>In a recent online survey of 500 U.S. consumers, Nielsen revealed that one in three respondents said they bought a product in the past 12 months based on seeing an ad for the product. Those who said they bought a product based on an ad were more likely to do so for certain product categories more than others.  68 percent of those surveyed said they bought food (CPG) products within the past year after seeing the product advertised, while 36 percent said they were compelled to buy beverages (hot/cold/soft drinks) after seeing an ad.</p>
<p>Ads for health/beauty products (cosmetics, hair products, personal hygiene, etc.) also resonated with more than half (51%) of consumers. In each of these categories, TV ads were cited as the most effective form of advertisement by far. 85 percent, 83 percent and 70 percent of respondents said TV commercials influenced them the most when purchasing beverages, food and health/beauty products, respectively.</p>
<p>This bodes well for three of the top five product categories that advertised in the 2010 Super Bowl and, after an estimated 48.5 million women watched last year’s game, presents a big opportunity for health and beauty companies to expand their reach. However, for longer-term purchases, such as personal finance services and cars, only 10 percent of consumers surveyed said they had bought either of those products based on exposure to an ad. Still, TV was cited as the most influential medium when deciding to purchase a car (32%), financial service (43%), pharmaceuticals (64%) or home electronics (57%).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"> Top 5 Product Categories (2010 Super Bowl Advertising)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Product Category</th>
<th> Ad Expenditure (000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Automotives</td>
<td>$32,715.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Beer</td>
<td>$32,715.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Motion Picture</td>
<td>$16,357.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Regular Soft Drinks</td>
<td>$14,870.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Tortilla Chips</td>
<td>$11,896.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/purchases-brand-exposure.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25969" title="purchases-brand-exposure" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/purchases-brand-exposure.png" alt="purchases-brand-exposure" width="577" height="287" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Cuddly, Funny, Sexy Ads Most Effective in the Big Game</strong><br />
An analysis of Super Bowl ads airing over the past six years (2005-2010) reveals that commercials featuring animals, humor and scantily clad women often show higher resonance among males and females.  “Resonance,” one of Nielsen’s “4 Rs” of advertising effectiveness (Reach, Receptivity, Resonance, Reaction), shows how well a campaign generated the desired viewer response to the brand. Nielsen data shows that men, in particular, can recall the brand advertised in beer commercials, while non-fatal violence (ie. people crashing into things or being slapped by each other) and collisions/explosions resonates better with women.  Teens and young adults (13-34) are more receptive to funny ads, including those with non-fatal violence, while older viewers (35+) show higher recall for ads that feature animals and beer. Across the board, commercials focusing on automotives, charitable organizations, and football-related content do not resonate as strongly.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> Most Recalled 2010 Super Bowl Ads (age 13-34)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description</th>
<th> Game Quarter</th>
<th> Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Snickers</td>
<td>Betty White and Abe Vigoda are tackled (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>166</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Man lays in casket full of snack chips (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>156</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Survivors of plane crash party on deserted island (:45)</td>
<td>Q2</td>
<td>154</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Man lives in house made of Bud Light (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>151</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Denny&#8217;s</td>
<td>Chicken screams as woman blows out birthday candles (:15)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>145</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
The Recall score is the percentage of viewers who can recall the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Recall Index).  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> Most Recalled 2010 Super Bowl Ads (age 35+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description</th>
<th> Game Quarter</th>
<th> Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Man lays in casket full of snack chips (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Dog takes off shock collar and puts it on man (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Young boy slaps mother&#8217;s date (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Clydesdale and calf race each other along fence (:60)</td>
<td>Q2</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>GoDaddy.com</td>
<td>Newscaster shows Danica Patrick &#8220;how hot is too hot&#8221; (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
The Recall score is the percentage of viewers who can recall the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Recall Index).  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> Most Recalled 2010 Super Bowl Ads (Females)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description</th>
<th> Game Quarter</th>
<th> Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Snickers</td>
<td>Betty White and Abe Vigoda are tackled (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>162</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Dog takes off shock collar and puts it on man (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Man lays in casket full of snack chips (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>154</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Clydesdale and calf race each other along fence (:60)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>154</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Town forms human bridge for delivery truck to drive over (:60)</td>
<td>Q2</td>
<td>150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
The Recall score is the percentage of viewers who can recall the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Recall Index).  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> Most Recalled 2010 Super Bowl Ads (Males)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description</th>
<th> Game Quarter</th>
<th> Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Man lays in casket full of snack chips (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Young boy slaps mother&#8217;s date (:30)</td>
<td>Q1</td>
<td>150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Denny&#8217;s</td>
<td>Chicken screams as woman blows out birthday candles (:15)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Survivors of plane crash party on deserted island (:45)</td>
<td>Q2</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>GoDaddy.com</td>
<td>Newscaster shows Danica Patrick &#8220;how hot is too hot&#8221; (:30)</td>
<td>Q4</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
The Recall score is the percentage of viewers who can recall the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Recall Index).  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/chips-beer-and-lip-gloss-which-super-bowl-advertisers-will-drive-consumer-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home is Where the Super Bowl Is</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/home-is-where-the-super-bowl-is/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/home-is-where-the-super-bowl-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Russon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The great majority of U.S. households – 9 out of 10 – tell Nielsen they will be watching Super Bowl XLV at home or at a friend’s or relative’s house instead of watching it from a restaurant or bar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to watching the Super Bowl, there’s no place like home. The great majority of U.S. households – 9 out of 10 – tell Nielsen they will be watching Super Bowl XLV at home or at a friend or relative’s house instead of watching it from a restaurant or bar. And while watching the game at home, only five percent of households expect to spend more than last year on food and beverages for the event, consistent with Nielsen’s findings in 2010.</p>
<p>“Consumers adjusted their behavior during the recession, and we see that trend playing out with the Super Bowl,” said James Russo, vice president, Global Consumer Insights at Nielsen. “Still very concerned about jobs and rising gas prices, consumers remain pragmatic with their spending. They are reducing their spending on entertainment and take-out, spending less on clothes and cutting back on expenses where they can, especially in mid to lower income households. That said consumers overall are cautiously optimistic so we don’t expect to see consumers cutting back as dramatically as they did last year.”</p>
<p>Nielsen’s survey of more than 60,000 U.S. households shows that 85 percent of Super Bowl viewers plan to spend the same amount or less on food and beverages for the Super Bowl this year, while only five percent plan to spend more.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/super-bowl-spending-viewing.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25952" title="super-bowl-spending-viewing" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/super-bowl-spending-viewing.png" alt="super-bowl-spending-viewing" width="550" height="554" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The Most Popular Holiday for Beer Sales?  Not the Super Bowl.</strong><br />
While beer and football may seem like a perfect combination, the Super Bowl is not the most popular beer holiday in the U.S. Nielsen’s research shows that the Super Bowl ranks relatively low among holiday beer sales, after Labor Day, Memorial Day and the Fourth of July.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/beer-sales.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25959" title="beer-sales" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/beer-sales.png" alt="beer-sales" width="314" height="198" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Snacks, Get Your Snacks</strong><br />
Super Bowl viewers stock their at-home parties with snacks, nearly 177 million pounds of snacks. The potato chip is the Super Bowl king of snacks, with nearly 46 million pounds sold.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/super-bowl-snack-sales.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25960" title="super-bowl-snack-sales" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/super-bowl-snack-sales.png" alt="super-bowl-snack-sales" width="394" height="287" /></a></p>
<p>“At-home Super Bowl viewing is an opportunity for grocery stores, mass merchandisers and other retailers selling food and beverage items,” said Russo. “The consumer is in control, now more than ever, and how food and beverage retailers demonstrate value and innovation to capture consumer spending, for big at-home viewing events like the Super Bowl or the Oscars is critical.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/home-is-where-the-super-bowl-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Football TV Ratings Soar: the NFL&#8217;s Playbook for Success</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year’s Super Bowl was the most watched TV program in U.S. history. With 106.5 million viewers, the game supplanted the long-time leading final episode of M*A*S*H (which had 105.5 million viewers in 1983).  Will this year’s NFL championship game beat the record again?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year’s Super Bowl was the most watched TV program in U.S. history. With 106.5 million viewers, the game supplanted the long-time leading final episode of M*A*S*H (which had 105.5 million viewers in 1983).  Will this year’s NFL championship game beat the record again? Many factors, from the competitiveness of the game to the weather, will come into play, but there is no question that football as a whole is more popular than ever on television.</p>
<p>A decade ago, the Baltimore Ravens – with a defense coached by Rex Ryan – beat the New York Giants in a lopsided 34-7 victory. Super Bowl XXXV was watched by 84.3 million viewers, down nearly 4 million from the year before. While that level of viewership was still high, the NFL’s prominence in the national consciousness and on television is stronger now, thanks to a perfect storm of social, media, cultural and technological developments in addition to some pretty savvy marketing.</p>
<p>It’s not just the Super Bowl that is drawing more viewers: Regular season ratings are also strong. In the past five years, ratings of NFL games have risen by more than one percentage point (from 9.3 in 2006 to 10.6 in 2010), accounting for more than 3.5 million additional viewers per game. In fact, eight out of the top ten primetime programs for the entire year were football games (and one – Undercover Boss – appeared immediately after the Super Bowl).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Top 10 TV Programs – Single Telecast 2010</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Telecast</th>
<th> Originator</th>
<th> Date Aired</th>
<th> Total Persons Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">36.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV Post    Game</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">25.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Super Bowl Kick-Off</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>FOX NFC Championship</td>
<td align="center">FOX</td>
<td align="center">1/24/10</td>
<td align="center">19.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>AFC Championship on    CBS</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">1/24/10</td>
<td align="center">16.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Academy Awards</td>
<td align="center">ABC</td>
<td align="center">3/7/10</td>
<td align="center">14.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Undercover Boss</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">13.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>FOX NFC Playoff-Sun</td>
<td align="center">FOX</td>
<td align="center">1/17/10</td>
<td align="center">12.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>AFC Divisional    Playoff-Sun</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">1/17/10</td>
<td align="center">12.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>FOX NFC Wildcard    Game</td>
<td align="center">FOX</td>
<td align="center">1/10/10</td>
<td align="center">11.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>What accounts for football’s hold on the television population? As usual, there isn’t only one answer, but here are some possibilities.</p>
<p><strong>Cross Marketing</strong><br />
While most other professional sports are broadcast on two or three networks, the NFL is spread across five, including three of the four major broadcast networks. This ubiquity has the effect of creating a cross-platform promotional powerhouse. Although the networks ostensibly promote their own upcoming games, in reality they are promoting football in general and the average viewer is exposed to myriad football promotions throughout the season. As a consequence, the average viewer is virtually guaranteed exposure to football marketing and advertising.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>More Female Fans</strong><br />
More American women watch the NFL than any other team sport, and not just the Super Bowl.  In the regular season, the NFL has eclipsed Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association in having the largest percentage of female viewers. In the past decade the NFL has launched several marketing and outreach programs, including coaching clinics, apparel that fits women and donning pink during breast cancer awareness month. Further, watching football tends to be a social event, with people watching in groups of varying gender composition. As a result, the percentage of the football audience that is female has grown from 32.6% in 2006 to 33.6% in 2010.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Season</th>
<th>Household Rating</th>
<th>Total Audience Viewers (000)</th>
<th>Male Viewers (000) and % of audience</th>
<th>Female Viewers (000) and % of audience</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>9.3</td>
<td>14,430  100.00%</td>
<td>9,732  67.44%</td>
<td>4,697  32.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2010</td>
<td>10.6</td>
<td>17,867  100.00%</td>
<td>11,865  66.41%</td>
<td>6,002  33.59%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><strong>Biggest markets have successful seasons</strong><br />
NFL has always relied on a mix of large and small markets, and with a strict salary cap and generous revenue sharing, teams from smaller markets such as Green Bay or Pittsburgh can compete financially with Chicago or New York.  As a result markets and regions are not perpetually at a competitive disadvantage as they are in other sports. In 2010, a whopping 24 of 32 NFL Local Markets enjoyed higher regular season ratings, with New Orleans pulling in the highest rating (43.9, up 6%) and St. Louis posting the highest percentage growth (up 66%).</p>
<p>Nevertheless, this year, some of the largest markets had the most successful teams and their local regular season game ratings posted solid increases, which contributed to higher national ratings when these teams appeared in national broadcasts.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Largest NFL Markets</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Market</th>
<th>2010 Local Rating</th>
<th>YOY Rating % Change</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>New York (Giants)</td>
<td>14.7</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Boston</td>
<td>30.9</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td>27.6</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>New York (Jets)</td>
<td>12.7</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philidelphia</td>
<td>28.3</td>
<td>5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><strong>QBs have Become Stars, On and Off the Field</strong><br />
In 2001, journeyman Trent Dilfer led the Ravens to a Championship, creating the perception that a team can win a Super Bowl without a marquee quarterback. Most NFL teams now subscribe to the belief that the quarterback is the most critical cog, both on and off the field. The Cowboys, for example, lost QB Tony Romo to injury and saw their season and ratings go south.</p>
<p>In recent years, the NFL has tried to safeguard their stars, implementing rules to ensure that the QB isn’t tackled low, hit in the head or after the whistle. And to a large extent, the quarterbacks this year were healthy and able to serve as the marquee names for their teams.</p>
<p>Interest in quarterbacks goes beyond the stadium: they are making news off the field too. Many have been linked romantically to supermodels, actresses and singers, creating news in celebrity magazines and other non-traditional media. Others have generated publicity for less positive reasons.</p>
<p>Leading the Super Bowl XLV teams are Aaron Rodgers of the Packers and Ben Roethlisberger of the Steelers. Rodgers is a rising star but  Roethlisberger, who has already won two Super Bowl rings, saw his reputation suffer in the wake of sexual assault allegations that were brought against him.</p>
<p>These perceptions of Rodgers and Roethlisberger are borne out by their N-Scores.  Together with E-Poll, Nielsen has devised a method of measuring the endorsement potential of more than 1,000 athletes and sports personalities.  Neither Rodgers nor Roethlisberger have N-Scores that approach the best known and most popular quarterbacks:</p>
<table class="chart" border="0" width="300">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">QB N-Scores</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Peyton Manning</td>
<td>262</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brett Favre</td>
<td>196</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tom Brady</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aaron Rodgers</td>
<td>39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Roethlisberger</td>
<td>24</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>The trend lines further illustrate the challenges trajectory of Rodgers and Roethlisberger’s N-Score ratings:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rodgers.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25842" title="rodgers" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rodgers.png" alt="rodgers" width="402" height="128" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/roethlisberger.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25841" title="roethlisberger" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/roethlisberger.png" alt="roethlisberger" width="402" height="240" /></a></p>
<p>Throughout 2010, football continued to break TV ratings records, showing that even in a fragmented media environment, it is still possible to generate large television numbers for programming that attracts viewers in all demographics.  Nielsen cannot predict whether this year’s Super Bowl will have the largest TV audience in history, but it is all but certain to be the most-watched program of 2011.</p>
<p>For more historical information on Super Bowl viewing, please see the following historical table:</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="7">Super Bowl Viewing, 1966-2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Super Bowl</th>
<th>Season</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Avg. Number of Homes (000)</th>
<th>Avg. Number of Persons 2+ (000)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLIV</td>
<td>2009</td>
<td width="100">Feb 7, 2010*</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>51,728</td>
<td>106,476</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLIII</td>
<td>2008</td>
<td>Feb 1, 2009*</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>48,139</td>
<td>98,732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLII</td>
<td>2007</td>
<td>Feb 3, 2008*</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>43.1</td>
<td>48,665</td>
<td>97,448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLI</td>
<td>2006</td>
<td>Feb 4 2007 *</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>42.6</td>
<td>47,505</td>
<td>93,184</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XL</td>
<td>2005</td>
<td>Feb 5 2006 *</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.6</td>
<td>45,867</td>
<td>90,745</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXIX</td>
<td>2004</td>
<td>Feb 6 2005</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>41.1</td>
<td>45,081</td>
<td>86,072</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXVIII</td>
<td>2003</td>
<td>Feb 1 2004</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>41.4</td>
<td>44,908</td>
<td>89,795</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXVII</td>
<td>2002</td>
<td>Jan 26 2003</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>40.7</td>
<td>43,433</td>
<td>88,637</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXVI</td>
<td>2001</td>
<td>Feb 3 2002</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>40.4</td>
<td>42,664</td>
<td>86,801</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXV</td>
<td>2000</td>
<td>Jan 28 2001</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>40.4</td>
<td>41,270</td>
<td>84,335</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXIV</td>
<td>1999</td>
<td>Jan 30 2000</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>43.3</td>
<td>43,618</td>
<td>88,465</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXIII</td>
<td>1998</td>
<td>Jan 31 1999</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>40.2</td>
<td>39,992</td>
<td>83,720</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXII</td>
<td>1997</td>
<td>Jan 25 1998</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>44.5</td>
<td>43,630</td>
<td>90,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXI</td>
<td>1996</td>
<td>Jan 26 1997</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>43.3</td>
<td>42,000</td>
<td>87,870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXX</td>
<td>1995</td>
<td>Jan 28 1996</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>44,145</td>
<td>94,080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXIX</td>
<td>1994</td>
<td>Jan 29 1995</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.3</td>
<td>39,400</td>
<td>83,420</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXVIII</td>
<td>1993</td>
<td>Jan 30 1994</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>45.5</td>
<td>42,860</td>
<td>90,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXVII</td>
<td>1992</td>
<td>Jan 31 1993</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>45.1</td>
<td>41,990</td>
<td>90,990</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXVI</td>
<td>1991</td>
<td>Jan 26 1992</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>40.3</td>
<td>37,120</td>
<td>79,590</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXV</td>
<td>1990</td>
<td>Jan 27 1991</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.9</td>
<td>39,010</td>
<td>79,510</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXIV</td>
<td>1989</td>
<td>Jan 28 1990</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>35,920</td>
<td>73,852</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXIII</td>
<td>1988</td>
<td>Jan 22 1989</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>43.5</td>
<td>39,320</td>
<td>81,590</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXII</td>
<td>1987</td>
<td>Jan 31 1988</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.9</td>
<td>37,120</td>
<td>80,140</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXI</td>
<td>1986</td>
<td>Jan 25 1987</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>45.8</td>
<td>40,030</td>
<td>87,190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XX</td>
<td>1985</td>
<td>Jan 26 1986</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>48.3</td>
<td>41,490</td>
<td>92,570</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XIX</td>
<td>1984</td>
<td>Jan 20 1985</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>46.4</td>
<td>39,390</td>
<td>85,530</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XVIII</td>
<td>1983</td>
<td>Jan 22 1984</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>46.4</td>
<td>38,880</td>
<td>77,620</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XVII</td>
<td>1982</td>
<td>Jan 30 1983</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>48.6</td>
<td>40,480</td>
<td>81,770</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XVI</td>
<td>1981</td>
<td>Jan 24 1982</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>49.1</td>
<td>40,020</td>
<td>85,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XV</td>
<td>1980</td>
<td>Jan 25 1981</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>44.4</td>
<td>34,540</td>
<td>68,290</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XIV</td>
<td>1979</td>
<td>Jan 20 1980</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>46.3</td>
<td>35,330</td>
<td>76,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XIII</td>
<td>1978</td>
<td>Jan 21 1979</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>47.1</td>
<td>35,090</td>
<td>74,740</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XII</td>
<td>1977</td>
<td>Jan 15 1978</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>47.2</td>
<td>34,410</td>
<td>78,940</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XI</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>Jan 09 1977</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>44.4</td>
<td>31,610</td>
<td>62,050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>X</td>
<td>1975</td>
<td>Jan 18 1976</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>42.3</td>
<td>29,440</td>
<td>57,710</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IX</td>
<td>1974</td>
<td>Jan 12 1975</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>42.4</td>
<td>29,040</td>
<td>56,050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VIII</td>
<td>1973</td>
<td>Jan 13 1974</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>41.6</td>
<td>27,540</td>
<td>51,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VII</td>
<td>1972</td>
<td>Jan 14 1973</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>42.7</td>
<td>27,670</td>
<td>53,320</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VI</td>
<td>1971</td>
<td>Jan 16 1972</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>44.2</td>
<td>27,450</td>
<td>56,640</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>V</td>
<td>1970</td>
<td>Jan 17 1971</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>39.9</td>
<td>23,980</td>
<td>46,040</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IV</td>
<td>1969</td>
<td>Jan 11 1970</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>39.4</td>
<td>23,050</td>
<td>44,270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>III</td>
<td>1968</td>
<td>Jan 12 1969</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>20,520</td>
<td>41,660</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>II</td>
<td>1967</td>
<td>Jan 14 1968</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>36.8</td>
<td>20,610</td>
<td>39,120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>I</td>
<td>1966</td>
<td>Jan 15 1967</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>22.6</td>
<td>12,410</td>
<td>26,750</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="7">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

