<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; sugar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/sugar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In U.S., A Holiday Baking Divide: North Vs. South</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baking supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chanukah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollar sales index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanukkah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total dry grocery sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total U.S. sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to holiday baking, consumers in the northern U.S. reach for baking supplies &#8212; like readymade frosting, cake decorations, chocolate chips, and food coloring, while southerners prefer to stick to the basics: flour and sugar.
Last November and December, supermarket shoppers in northern markets like Hartford and New Haven, Conn. and Buffalo and Rochester, N.Y. spent almost one-third more, percentage-wise, on baking supplies than average American consumers, Nielsen reports.
During the same period, shoppers in southern markets like Birmingham, Ala. and Memphis dominated sales of flour, spending 106% and 78% more, respectively, than average Americans.
Consumers in Memphis and Birmingham also dominated sales ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cookies_gingerbread_men.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5950" title="cookies_gingerbread_men" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cookies_gingerbread_men-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>When it comes to holiday baking, consumers in the northern U.S. reach for baking supplies &#8212; like readymade frosting, cake decorations, chocolate chips, and food coloring, while southerners prefer to stick to the basics: flour and sugar.</p>
<p>Last November and December, supermarket shoppers in northern markets like Hartford and New Haven, Conn. and Buffalo and Rochester, N.Y. spent almost one-third more, percentage-wise, on baking supplies than average American consumers, Nielsen reports.</p>
<p>During the same period, shoppers in southern markets like Birmingham, Ala. and Memphis dominated sales of flour, spending 106% and 78% more, respectively, than average Americans.</p>
<p>Consumers in Memphis and Birmingham also dominated sales of sugar, spending 57% and 46% more, respectively, than average Americans on that most basic of holiday baking ingredients, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>West Texas, Little Rock, Ark., Nashville, Tenn., and Atlanta were also among the top markets for flour and sugar sales.  Shoppers in these markets spent 30% to 52% more on flour, and 19% to 28% more on sugar than average Americans.</p>
<p><span id="more-5929"></span></p>
<p><strong>Top 10 U.S. Markets: Baking Supplies</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest<br />
index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>HARTFORD/NEW HAVEN</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BUFFALO/ROCHESTER</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>GRAND RAPIDS</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MINNEAPOLIS</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>CLEVELAND</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>SYRACUSE</td>
<td>122</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>MILWAUKEE</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>ST. LOUIS</td>
<td>115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>SEATTLE</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>DETROIT</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>PHILADELPHIA</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>ALBANY</td>
<td>112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>PORTLAND</td>
<td>112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>BOSTON</td>
<td>110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>SAN FRANCISCO</td>
<td>110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SACRAMENTO</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank</em></td>
<td><em>SAN ANTONIO</em></td>
<td><em>68</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 U.S. Markets: Flour</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>BIRMINGHAM</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>MEMPHIS</td>
<td>178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>WEST TEXAS</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LITTLE ROCK</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>HOUSTON</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>NASHVILLE</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>SAN ANTONIO</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>ATLANTA</td>
<td>130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>DALLAS</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>PHOENIX</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>PORTLAND</td>
<td>105</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>NEW ORLEANS/MOBILE</td>
<td>103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>KANSAS CITY</td>
<td>103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank </em></td>
<td><em>ORLANDO </em></td>
<td><em>67</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 U.S. Markets: Sugar</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>MEMPHIS</td>
<td>157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BIRMINGHAM</td>
<td>146</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LITTLE ROCK</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>NASHVILLE</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>RALEIGH/DURHAM</td>
<td>125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>NEW ORLEANS/MOBILE</td>
<td>124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>CHARLOTTE</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>ATLANTA</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>JACKSONVILLE</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>WEST TEXAS</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>OKLAHOMA CITY/TULSA</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>LOUISVILLE</td>
<td>114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank </em></td>
<td><em>OAHU </em></td>
<td><em>68</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Sales Index reflects a category’s share of total dry grocery sales for a Nielsen market versus the total U.S., using supermarket dollar sales over the most current 52-week period.</p>
<p>The Memphis market’s index of 157 for the Sugar product category, for example, reveals that supermarkets in that particular market sell 57% more sugar, relative to total dry grocery purchases, than the national average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Sales Of Canning Supplies, Auto Products, and Tobacco Skew To Rural U.S. Households</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-sales-of-canning-supplies-auto-products-and-tobacco-skew-to-rural-us-households/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-sales-of-canning-supplies-auto-products-and-tobacco-skew-to-rural-us-households/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canning supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbonated beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charcoal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freezing supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rodenticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rural American households spent more than twice as much on canning and freezing supplies, 47% more on automotive products, and 38% more on tobacco and accessories than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.
&#8220;Plain Rural Living&#8221; households &#8212; a Nielsen Spectra lifestyle segment that includes households in small towns and rural areas with the lowest population densities &#8212; account for 21% of all American households.  These households represented 43% of canning/freezing supplies product dollar sales, 31% of automotive product dollar sales, and 29% of tobacco and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rural_deer-crossing-sign.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5351" title="rural_deer-crossing-sign" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rural_deer-crossing-sign-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>Rural American households spent more than twice as much on canning and freezing supplies, 47% more on automotive products, and 38% more on tobacco and accessories than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>&#8220;Plain Rural Living&#8221; households &#8212; a <a href="http://au.nielsen.com/products/Spectra.shtml" target="_blank">Nielsen Spectra</a> lifestyle segment that includes households in small towns and rural areas with the lowest population densities &#8212; account for 21% of all American households.  These households represented 43% of canning/freezing supplies product dollar sales, 31% of automotive product dollar sales, and 29% of tobacco and accessories product dollar sales.</p>
<p>Other categories skewing to rural households include insecticides, pesticides, and rodenticides, as well as fresh meat, flour, sugar/sweeteners, pet food, and carbonated beverages.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Categories:<br />
Rural Households</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Canning, Freezing Supplies</td>
<td>204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Automotive</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Tobacco and Accessories</td>
<td>138</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Insecticides/Pesticides/Rodenticides</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Flour</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Sugar, Sweeteners</td>
<td>126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fresh Meat</td>
<td>124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Pet Food</td>
<td>118</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Carbonated Beverages</td>
<td>115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Charcoal, Logs, Accessories</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: “Dollar Volume Index” is a demographic segment’s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment’s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-5347"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting rural households may want to promote these categories (above) with feature ads, displays, and product assortments. Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen’s Homescan consumer panel, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population. Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-sales-of-canning-supplies-auto-products-and-tobacco-skew-to-rural-us-households/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

