<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; sports ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/sports-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Record Audience Watches Opening Rugby World Cup Match</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/record-audience-watches-opening-rugby-world-cup-match/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/record-audience-watches-opening-rugby-world-cup-match/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An unprecedented 81% of the population (15 years and older) were glued to screens across New Zealand to watch the opening game of the Rugby World Cup, according to the results of a survey conducted by Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AUCKLAND, New Zealand – An unprecedented 81% of the population (15 years and older) were glued to screens across New Zealand to watch the opening game of the Rugby World Cup, according to the results of a survey conducted by Nielsen.</p>
<p>&#8220;New Zealanders take their Rugby very seriously as can be seen by an unprecedented audience of viewers who watched at home, at a friend’s home, in a pub or at one of the many outdoor venues set up for the tournament. To establish live viewing of the game both in-home and out-of-home and for the opening ceremony, Nielsen conducted a special survey of all individuals (15+) in their 500-home Television Audience Measurement panel,&#8221; said Claire Harris, Managing Director of Nielsen Television Audience Measurement in New   Zealand.</p>
<p>The Rugby World Cup is the third biggest international sporting event after the Olympic Games and the FIFA World Cup. 80 nations compete in qualifiers over 3 years for 20 spots in the final competition. The match between the 2011 Host nation’s team, the New Zealand All Blacks, and the Pacific Island nation of Tonga, was the first of 48 matches to be played and televised over the ensuing six weeks. The 2011 qualifying teams also include Australia, England, France, Italy, South Africa, United States, Wales, Scotland and Ireland, who are all competing for the holy grail of International Rugby, the Webb Ellis Cup.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was a perfect day for the Opening Ceremony and inaugural match of the tournament, and there were numerous outdoor venues to watch the game with crowds exceeding all expectations.</p>
<p>&#8220;The massive audience for the opening game illustrates the power of television in making such a wonderful event accessible to sports fans right across the country,&#8221; Harris added.</p>
<p>The study also showed that people viewing out-of-home were more likely to be male, younger and from Auckland.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Rugby_NZ.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29201  aligncenter" title="New Zealand Rugby World Cup Viewership" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Rugby_NZ.png" alt="New Zealand Rugby World Cup Viewership" width="516" height="402" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/record-audience-watches-opening-rugby-world-cup-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Years of Primetime: The Rise of Reality and Sports Programming</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/10-years-of-primetime-the-rise-of-reality-and-sports-programming/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/10-years-of-primetime-the-rise-of-reality-and-sports-programming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the audience size for broadcast primetime remains strong at nearly 200 million viewers, the composition of the programming in the popular 8-11 p.m. time block has changed significantly over the past 10 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past 10 years, DVR, online streaming, digital cable, video on-demand and increased programming options have fundamentally changed the way Americans watch television. Yet, the audience size for broadcast primetime remains strong at just shy of 200 million viewers. What has changed, however, is the makeup of the programming in the popular 8-11 p.m. time block, according to Nielsen’s analysis of the top 10 primetime broadcast TV shows.</p>
<p><strong>Reality Rises<br />
</strong>Reality first made an appearance in the top 10 rankings in 2000, and since the 2002-2003 season has consistently captured the largest percentage of the audience watching the top 10 broadcast programs.  In the 2007-2008 season, reality programming captured 77 percent of the total audience viewing those top 10 programs.</p>
<p><strong>Sports Scores<br />
</strong>The audience for Sports Events in the top 10 programs has hovered around 8 percent since the 2001 season, until it jumped to 19.4 percent in the 2009-2010 season and held tight last year.</p>
<p><strong>Dramas Deliver<br />
</strong>The audience for General Dramas peaked in the 2005-2006 season, accounting for 42.8 percent of the total audience,  but decreased by about half last year, consisting of 21.6 percent of the total audience. Still, they have remained a consistent presence in the top 10.</p>
<p><strong>Sitcoms Sit Out<br />
</strong>Sitcoms, on the other hand, have had a tougher time holding a spot in the top 10. Once synonymous with primetime broadcasts, sitcoms disappeared from the ranking in the 2004-2005 season, only to return again briefly in the 2008-2009 season, making up just 7.4 percent of the total combined audience of the top ten programs.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tv-genre-wire-post_11-3757.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29143" title="Shifting TV Reality" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tv-genre-wire-post_11-3757.gif" alt="Shifting TV Reality" width="573" height="501" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Looking Ahead to this TV Season</strong><br />
Monday’s official kickoff of the Fall TV season creates opportunity for new TV hits and misses.  Will sitcoms reclaim their position in the top ten ranking or will reality programs extend their reign? Or, will a new program type emerge and shake up the rankings yet again?  Stay tuned.</p>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong><br />
Nielsen analyzed the broadcast prime ranking reports for the September to September seasons over the past decade (September-STD for the 2010-2011 season) to determine the top genres of TV programs (type codes).</p>
<p>For each season, we selected the top ten broadcast primetime programs (ranked on HH rating) and added the average audience of each program together, to get one figure for the total combined audience of the top ten programs.  Then, we added up the average audiences for each type code in the top ten list and calculated the percentage of the total audience for each type code.  For example, in the 2001-2002 season, “General Drama” programming held 29.5% of the total audience for the top ten broadcast primetime programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/10-years-of-primetime-the-rise-of-reality-and-sports-programming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl XLV Most Viewed Telecast in U.S. Broadcast History</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, making it the most watched television program of all time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, surpassing last year’s Super Bowl, and thereby breaking the record, yet again, for the most watched television program of all time in the U.S.  The game was viewed in 53.3 million households, with a preliminary 46.0 U.S. household rating.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Most Watched  Telecasts of All Time (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Avg. # of Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLV</td>
<td>February 6, 2011</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>111,010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td>February 7, 2010</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>106,476</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>M*A*S*H Special</td>
<td>February 28, 1983</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>105,970</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIII</td>
<td>February 1, 2009</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>98,732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLII</td>
<td>February 3, 2008</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>97,448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XXX</td>
<td>January 28, 1996</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>94,076</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>“Super Bowl XLV caps what is arguably the most successful season that any sports league has ever had,” said Pat McDonough,   “The number of people watching NFL games has never been higher, with 24% more people watching the average NFL game this year than just five years ago.  The Super Bowl continues to be in a category of its own, with an appeal that transcends sports and extends even to the commercials.  Because of the cliff-hanger nature of the game, viewers were tuning in until the very end, driving viewing levels to new heights.”</p>
<p>Over the past several years, the NFL has attracted larger audiences by <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/">broadening its appeal to new audiences</a>, including women and Hispanics, by building up high-profile players – especially quarterbacks – to personify the league and by cross-promoting the games across multiple television networks and emerging digital platforms.</p>
<p><strong>Pittsburgh and Milwaukee Lead Local Market viewing</strong><br />
In the local markets, Milwaukee and Pittsburgh were tied, with a 59.7 household rating.  Other high local market ratings include Columbus, OH and Nashville.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top Five Local Markets, Super Bowl XLV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Share</th>
<th>Households (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>87</td>
<td>693</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Milwaukee</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>538</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Columbus, OH</td>
<td>56.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>515</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>564</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>76</td>
<td>388</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cowboys Tackle Top Spot in NFL Media Exposure Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Sports Media Scorecard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index, the Cowboys were still the most popular NFL team in America last season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as much of the country rallied around the Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints last year, it seems that the Dallas Cowboys are still America&#8217;s team.</p>
<p>According to The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index, which measures media exposure on TV and online, the Cowboys were still the most popular NFL team in America last season. Jerry Jones&#8217;s franchise earned the top indexed score of 100, far surpassing the runner-up Pittsburgh Steelers who finished with an index of 81.</p>
<p>The Cowboys&#8217; top ranking was boosted by first-place showings in two of the four categories tallied by Nielsen: gross audience during nationally televised games and monthly unique audience to the team web site. The other two categories &#8211; local team ratings and total buzz volume &#8211; were captured by the Saints and New York Giants, respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="7">NIELSEN&#8217;S NFL MEDIA EXPOSURE RANKINGS</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>TEAM</th>
<th>LOCAL TV RANK</th>
<th>NATIONAL TV RANK</th>
<th>WEBSITE/UNIQUE AUDIENCE RANK</th>
<th>ONLINE BUZZ VOLUME RANK</th>
<th>OVERALL INDEX</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td><strong>Dallas Cowboys</strong></td>
<td>8</td>
<td><em>1</em></td>
<td><em>1</em></td>
<td>2</td>
<td><strong>100</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>2</strong></td>
<td><strong>Pittsburgh Steelers</strong></td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>8</td>
<td><strong>81</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>3</strong></td>
<td><strong>New York Giants</strong></td>
<td>30</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>1</td>
<td><strong>70</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Chicago Bears</strong></td>
<td>16</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>3</td>
<td><em>5</em></td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Green Bay Packers</strong></td>
<td>5</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>11</td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Minnesota Vikings</strong></td>
<td>4</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>12</td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>7 </strong></td>
<td><strong>Philadelphia Eagles</strong></td>
<td>12</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>6</td>
<td><strong>66</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>8 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Indianapolis Colts</strong></td>
<td><em>6</em></td>
<td>7</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>14</td>
<td><strong>62</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>8 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>New Orleans Saints</strong></td>
<td>1</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>10</td>
<td><strong>62</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>10</strong></td>
<td><strong>New England Patriots</strong></td>
<td>14</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>13</td>
<td><strong>58</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="7">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Note: Time period of data reflects the 2009-10 NFL regular season</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Dallas has held the top two spots in each of the last two years. The Steelers moved up from third to second, swapping places with the Giants. The Minnesota Vikings, aided no doubt by the presence and performance of legendary QB Brett Favre,  climbed from 13th place in 2008 to a tie for 4th in the 2009 regular season ranking. The Washington Redskins, meanwhile, dropped from 5th in 2008 to 11th in 2009.</p>
<p>NFC teams dominated the 2009 rankings. Seven of the top 10 teams  represented the conference, while the Steelers, Colts (t-8th) and Patriots (10th) were the only three AFC teams to crack the top third of the list.</p>
<p>Among the two New York teams, the Giants had the most media exposure, ranking 15 spots ahead of the Jets. And even despite drawing 38% lower local market ratings than their Bay Area rivals, the Oakland Raiders were the most popular national brand out of Northern California, ranking two spots ahead of the San Francisco 49ers (25th vs. 27th).</p>
<p>The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index measured all 32 NFL teams in four categories during the 2009 regular season: local team ratings, gross national TV audience, online buzz volume, and monthly unique audiences to official team websites. Teams in each category were assigned a score, with the top rank worth 100 points and each subsequent ranking assigned a lower weighted score based its distance from the top. Final team rankings were calculated using the sum of scores across all four categories, and then indexed with the highest total equaling 100.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s NFL Media Exposure Index was recently featured in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703453804575479961782758620.html" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Issues Lead Super Bowl Advertising Online Buzz</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/social-issues-lead-super-bowl-advertising-online-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/social-issues-lead-super-bowl-advertising-online-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focus on the Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ManCrunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Blackshaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Tebow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The early buzz data makes one thing clear -- controversy drives conversation,” said Pete Blackshaw, executive vice president of digital strategy at The Nielsen Company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ads for social advocacy issues planned for the Super Bowl are generating more marketing buzz than traditional brands in the lead up to the game, according to an analysis released today by The Nielsen Company. Ads for the pro-life organization “Focus on the Family” featuring college football star Tim Tebow and gay dating site ManCrunch earned some of the most pre-game buzz for their controversial subject matters.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/advertiser-buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19911" title="advertiser-buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/advertiser-buzz.png" alt="advertiser-buzz" width="575" height="350" /></a></p>
<p align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p>“Focus on the Family” earned 33.4% of total Super Bowl buzz in a two-month period ending January 31st. ManCrunch achieved 6% of the total online buzz in that time, even though its commercial will not air during the Super Bowl after CBS declined to run it. Similarly, Pepsi is the second most discussed advertiser associated with the Super Bowl in the last two months, despite company plans to not advertise the brand during this year’s game.</p>
<p>&#8220;The early buzz data makes one thing clear &#8212; controversy drives conversation,” said Pete Blackshaw, executive vice president of digital strategy at The Nielsen Company. “Both the anti-abortion ad and the gay-themed ad have triggered significant levels of conversation. Other advertisers looking to drive buzz on top of their ads may need to work a bit harder to navigate around the controversial content.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even though the “Focus on the Family” ad has earned the most online buzz, 75% of it is not directly linked to the organization. Consumers instead often refer to it as the “Tim Tebow ad” or the “Tim Tebow pro-life ad” without directly mentioning “Focus on the Family.”</p>
<p>The emergence of hot-button social issues alters the landscape of where Super Bowl marketing is discussed. While online sports communities remain a force in the Super Bowl marketing dialogue, political message boards are driving 21% of the buzz.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/community-buzz-superbowl.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19914" title="community-buzz-superbowl" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/community-buzz-superbowl.png" alt="community-buzz-superbowl" width="500" height="475" /></a></p>
<p align="center">There’s a reason why products, brands, and issues associated with the Super Bowl generate so much hype. According to Nielsen’s historical data, ten Super Bowls rank among the 20 highest rated U.S. broadcasts since 1961. Meanwhile, the top 50 sports broadcasts of all time include 40 Super Bowls – meaning only three of the game’s telecasts do not make the list.</p>
<p>Last year’s game was the most viewed Super Bowl ever with an average of 98.7 million viewers. It was the fourth consecutive year of overall viewership growth since Super Bowl XXXIX was viewed by 86.1 million in 2005. The trend is also clear when broken down by men and women.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/superbowl-ratings-history.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19916" title="superbowl-ratings-history" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/superbowl-ratings-history.png" alt="superbowl-ratings-history" width="575" height="400" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/social-issues-lead-super-bowl-advertising-online-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Networks Air Over 43,000 Hours of Sports Event Coverage in 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/networks-air-over-43000-hours-of-sports-event-coverage-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/networks-air-over-43000-hours-of-sports-event-coverage-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National broadcast and cable TV networks aired over 43,700 hours of sporting events in the U.S. last year, according to new statistics released in Nielsen's report on "The Changing Face of Sports Media." Nielsen also found that advertisers spent an estimated $7.6 billion on sports programming alone in 2009.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National broadcast and cable TV networks aired over 43,700 hours of sporting events in the U.S. last year, according to new statistics released in Nielsen&#8217;s report on &#8220;<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/press/FaceOfSports_US_rpt.pdf">The Changing Face of Sports Media</a>.&#8221; Nielsen also found that advertisers spent an estimated $7.6 billion on sports programming alone in 2009.</p>
<p>According to the report, sports fans turned to the computer screen in overwhelming numbers to complement TV viewership. Nielsen estimates that 81 million people in the U.S. visited sports websites each month in 2009. Fans used the internet to track all the major storylines in sports, from A-Rod&#8217;s steroid admission, to Tiger&#8217;s very public downfall, and everything in between:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/buzz2009-lg.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19462" title="buzz2009-sm" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/buzz2009-sm.png" alt="buzz2009-sm" width="575" height="345" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;The data reveal that we are living in an incredible time for sports consumption,&#8221; said Stephen Master, VP of Nielsen Sports. &#8220;Leagues have used websites, social networks, and smartphones to create a virtual sports bar for fan dialogue to help the buzz surrounding major televised sporting events.&#8221;</p>
<p>Download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/press/FaceOfSports_US_rpt.pdf">The Changing Face of Sports Media</a>, which includes a breakdown of TV, online, advertising statistics for each major sport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/networks-air-over-43000-hours-of-sports-event-coverage-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL, NBA, MLB Enjoy &#8216;Game 7&#8242; Effect</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nhl-nba-mlb-enjoy-game-7-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nhl-nba-mlb-enjoy-game-7-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman doesn&#8217;t need to pick a side in tonight&#8217;s do-or-die Game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals. After all, history says that Bettman and the NHL have already won &#8211; at least when it comes to TV viewers.
The Nielsen Company looked back at the four Stanley Cup Finals match-ups that have gone the full seven games since 2000 and in each case, Game 7 was a ratings windfall. For example, games one through six of the 2006 finals between Edmonton and Carolina averaged 2.4 million viewers. Game ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman doesn&#8217;t need to pick a side in tonight&#8217;s do-or-die Game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals. After all, history says that Bettman and the NHL have already won &#8211; at least when it comes to TV viewers.</p>
<p>The Nielsen Company looked back at the four Stanley Cup Finals match-ups that have gone the full seven games since 2000 and in each case, Game 7 was a ratings windfall. For example, games one through six of the 2006 finals between Edmonton and Carolina averaged 2.4 million viewers. Game 7, however, more than doubled that figure with 5.3 million viewers.</p>
<p style="center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nhlfinals_avg.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12734" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nhlfinals_avg.png" alt="" width="513" height="322" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-12724"></span>In 2003, when the New Jersey Devils finished off the Anaheim Ducks, Game 7 was watched by 7.2 million U.S. viewers on ABC. Not only did the game attract 140% more viewers than the average of the previous six games, but it was also (and still is) the most-watched Stanley Cup Finals game since at least 1992.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Game 7&#8243; effect isn&#8217;t just limited to the NHL. When Detroit and San Antonio took the NBA Finals to the limit in 2005, Game 7 was watched by 65% more viewers than the series average to date. And in the eight MLB World Series or LCS matchups to go the full seven games, since 2000, Game 7 viewership overshadowed the rest of the series&#8217; averages each time by anywhere from 74% to 94%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nhl-nba-mlb-enjoy-game-7-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Ready For Some Football?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/are-you-ready-for-some-football/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/are-you-ready-for-some-football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl kickoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wait is finally over for anxious football fans, as the NFL&#8217;s annual Thursday Night Kickoff Game, tonight on NBC, will usher in this year&#8217;s NFL season.  The defending Super Bowl Champion New York Giants will take on their divisional foe, the Washington Redskins. 
Below are historical U.S. television ratings for NFL Kickoff Games since 2002.
In terms of TV ratings, the 2003 game, which drew 19.1 million U.S. viewers, is the year to beat.  Last year&#8217;s game attracted approximately 17.5 million viewers.



YEAR
NETWORK
MATCHUP
US HOUSEHOLD
AA%*
VIEWERS (P2+)


2007
NBC
New Orleans at Indianapolis
11.4
17,471,000


2006
NBC
Miami at Pittsburgh
12.6
19,043,000


2005
ABC
Oakland at New England
11.7
18,008,000


2004
ABC
Indianapolis at New England
11.4
16,888,000


2003
ABC
N.Y. Jets at Washington
12.9
19,149,000


2002
ESPN
San Francisco ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/football.jpg"></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/football1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1028" title="football1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/football1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>The wait is finally over for anxious football fans, as the NFL&#8217;s annual <a href="http://www.nfl.com/kickoff" target="_blank">Thursday Night Kickoff Game</a>, tonight on NBC, will usher in this year&#8217;s NFL season.  The defending Super Bowl Champion New York Giants will take on their divisional foe, the Washington Redskins. </p>
<p>Below are historical U.S. television ratings for NFL Kickoff Games since 2002.</p>
<p>In terms of TV ratings, the 2003 game, which drew 19.1 million U.S. viewers, is the year to beat.  Last year&#8217;s game attracted approximately 17.5 million viewers.</p>
<table class="chart" style="text-align: left;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>YEAR</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>MATCHUP</th>
<th>US HOUSEHOLD<br />
AA%*</th>
<th>VIEWERS (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2007</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>New Orleans at Indianapolis</td>
<td>11.4</td>
<td>17,471,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2006</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>Miami at Pittsburgh</td>
<td>12.6</td>
<td>19,043,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2005</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Oakland at New England</td>
<td>11.7</td>
<td>18,008,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2004</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Indianapolis at New England</td>
<td>11.4</td>
<td>16,888,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2003</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>N.Y. Jets at Washington</td>
<td>12.9</td>
<td>19,149,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2002</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>San Francisco at N.Y. Giants</td>
<td>7.6</td>
<td>10,799,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">*US HH AA% : Percentage of US households &#8211; Average Audience during entire telecast</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/are-you-ready-for-some-football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Sports Ratings Experiencing a Resurgance</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-ratings-soar-stanley-cup-nba-finals-us-open-all-see-major-gains/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-ratings-soar-stanley-cup-nba-finals-us-open-all-see-major-gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While primetime TV ratings continue to suffer, sports programming across the US has seen significant growth over the past few months.   Every major sporting event in the US over the past two months (The Kentucky Derby, The Belmont Stakes, The NBA Finals, The Stanley Cup Finals, The US Open Golf Championship) have enjoyed major successes. 
The highly-anticipated Summer Olympics in Beijing should continue the trend.  NBC will feature 1,400 hours of television coverage of the Summer Olympics with an additional 2,200 hours to be streamed online. 
The growth in sports programming comes on the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-88" style="float: left;" title="domestic life" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/sports_fans-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" />While primetime TV ratings continue to suffer, sports programming across the US has seen significant growth over the past few months.   Every major sporting event in the US over the past two months (The Kentucky Derby, The Belmont Stakes, The NBA Finals, The Stanley Cup Finals, The US Open Golf Championship) have enjoyed major successes. </p>
<p>The highly-anticipated Summer Olympics in Beijing should continue the trend.  NBC will feature <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2008-05-29-summertv-olympics_N.htm" target="_blank">1,400 hours of television coverage </a>of the Summer Olympics with an additional <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/19/nbc-to-stream-2200-hours_n_107986.html" target="_blank">2,200 hours to be streamed online</a>. </p>
<p>The growth in sports programming comes on the heels of a trying time for <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-et-channel26-2008may26,0,5458013.story" target="_blank">entertainment programming</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-ratings-soar-stanley-cup-nba-finals-us-open-all-see-major-gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

