<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Time Spent Viewing Video on Social Networking Sites Up 98% Year-Over-Year In October</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-viewing-video-on-social-networking-sites-up-98-year-over-year-in-october/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-viewing-video-on-social-networking-sites-up-98-year-over-year-in-october/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gibs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=17984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time spent viewing video on social networking sites increased 98 percent year-over-year as the number of online video streams viewed on social networking and blog sites increased 45 percent year-over-year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Facebook is Top Social Networking Destination by Video Streams for the 2nd Month in a Row in October<br />
</strong>Time spent viewing video on social networking sites increased 98 percent year-over-year, from 503.8 million minutes in October 2008 to 999.4 million minutes in October 2009, according to Nielsen. In conjunction, the number of online video streams viewed on social networking and blog sites increased 45 percent year-over-year, from 240.8 million streams in October 2008 to 349.5 million in October 2009.</div>
<div>
<p> <br />
“During the past year, online video viewing has become central to the Web experience. In conjunction with this increase, we are seeing remarkable growth in video viewing on social networking sites and it is only natural that these two trends would converge in consumers’ minds, making sites like Facebook and Myspace.com, increasingly important distribution points for both consumer and professionally generated video,” said Jon Gibs, vice president, media analytics.</p>
<p>Facebook was the No. 1 online social networking and blog destination in October 2009, with 217.8 million total video streams viewed during the month. Myspace.com and Stickam were No. 2 and No. 3, with 85.2 million and 26.3 million video streams, respectively.</p></div>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<div id="attachment_18010" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 536px"><img class="size-full wp-image-18010" title="topsocialnetworks_nielsenlogo" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/topsocialnetworks_nielsenlogo.JPG" alt="Source: The Nielsen Company" width="526" height="233" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: The Nielsen Company</p></div>
</div>
<p><strong>Video Viewing on Facebook Continues to Grow<br />
</strong>During the last year, Facebook’s online video viewing audience has experienced tremendous growth. Year-over-year, total time spent viewing video on Facebook increased 1,840 percent, from 34.9 million minutes in October 2008 to 677.0 million in October 2009. The number of unique viewers of video increased 548 percent and total streams grew 987 percent during the same time period.</p>
<p>“Facebook’s rapid growth in online video during the last year illustrates the site’s evolution from simply a communications focused tool to a media portal,” remarked Gibs. “Social networking sites are evolving from a venue for catching up with friends to a platform for personal expression, allowing consumers to share their experiences in the full variety of content formats available online.”<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<div id="attachment_18013" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 493px"><img class="size-full wp-image-18013" title="fb video trend_nielsenlogo" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/fb-video-trend_nielsenlogo1.JPG" alt="Source: The Nielsen Company" width="483" height="279" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: The Nielsen Company</p></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-viewing-video-on-social-networking-sites-up-98-year-over-year-in-october/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Social Media Impacting How Much We Email?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/is-social-media-impacting-how-much-we-email/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/is-social-media-impacting-how-much-we-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If social media and social networks are these all-powerful game changers, shouldn’t they eventually make a newsworthy impact on email, the internet's original "killer app?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Jon Gibs, VP, Media Analytics</em></strong></p>
<p>In the past, we discussed ways that social media has transformed the internet, having been so bold to say that social networks fundamentally changed the way we consume online media. So, if social media and social networks are these all-powerful game changers, shouldn’t they eventually make a newsworthy impact on email, the internet&#8217;s original &#8220;killer app?&#8221;</p>
<p>We decided to churn some quick data to test our hypothesis that “Consumption of social media decreases email use.” First, we broke the online population into four groups. The first three are terciles of social media consumption in minutes. The fourth is a group that doesn&#8217;t use social media at all.  We then looked at each segment&#8217;s time of web based email consumption over the course of a year. Finally, we subtracted the email consumption of those that do not use social media from those that do, basically to show a lift over possible external forces. Clearly, there are more robust approaches that could be taken (controlling for factors other than consumption for example) but for the sake of this simple experiment, we tried to keep it straightforward.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what we found:<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/social_media_email.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16222" title="social media email usage" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/social_media_email.png" alt="social media email usage" width="548" height="323" /></a></p>
<p>At least from this small experiment our hypothesis was disproved, but interesting nonetheless.  It  actually appears that social media use makes people consume email <em>more</em>, not  less, as we had originally assumed – particularly for the highest social media  users. Intuitively this makes some sense.  Social media sites like Facebook send  messages to your inbox every time someone comments on your posting or something  you&#8217;ve participated in, and depending on your settings, can send updates on  almost every activity.  Also, it&#8217;s perfectly logical that as people make  connections though social media, they maintain those connections outside of the  specific platform and may extend those connections to email, a phone  conversation or even in-person meetings.</p>
<p>This modest kitchen sink  experiment further stoked our curiosity; the next step is to take a more robust  approach to develop correlations between platforms to understand if this  relationship is different across specific demographics and behavioral groups –  rather than by levels of consumption.</p>
<p>If you have other  theories or questions, we&#8217;d love to see your comments or questions below. Of  course, you can contact us by <a href="mailto:nielsenwire@nielsen.com">email</a> or social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/is-social-media-impacting-how-much-we-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The More Affluent and More Urban are More Likely to use Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-more-affluent-and-more-urban-are-more-likely-to-use-social-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-more-affluent-and-more-urban-are-more-likely-to-use-social-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claritas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re in the U.S. and are using a social network like Facebook, Myspace or LinkedIn, chances are you’re more affluent and more urban than the average American.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re in the U.S. and are using a social network like Facebook, MySpace or LinkedIn, chances are you&#8217;re more affluent and more urban than the average American according to <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/tab/product_families/nielsen_claritas">Nielsen Claritas</a>, which provides in-depth segmentation analysis of consumer behavior.</p>
<p>&#8220;Nielsen&#8217;s online data shows that about half of the U.S. population visited a social networking website in the last year and that number grows every quarter,&#8221; said Wils Corrigan, AVP, Research &amp; Development, Nielsen Claritas. &#8220;The rising popularity of these sites and the deep engagement consumers have with them has advertisers and marketers asking for more and more detail as to which lifestyles should be targeted for their online advertising and promotions.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Facebook vs Myspace</h3>
<p>Through Claritas, Nielsen defines U.S. households in terms of <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/documents/pdf/fact_sheets.Par.69269.File.dat/Nielsen%20Claritas%20PRIZM%20Brochure.pdf">66 demographically and behaviorally distinct segments</a> like &#8220;Young Digerati&#8221; or &#8220;Beltway Boomers.&#8221;  When those segments are overlaid with the activity of Nielsen&#8217;s online panel of more than 200K, we see a marked difference in the demographic makeup of the two largest social networks, Facebook and MySpace.</p>
<ul>
<li>Facebook users have a largely upscale profile. The top third of lifestyle segments relative to affluence were 25% more likely to use Facebook than those in the lower third.</li>
<li>The bottom third segments related to affluence are 37% more likely to use MySpace than those in the top third.</li>
<li>Users of Facebook were also much more likely to use LinkedIn, a network geared towards business and professional networking, than those who use MySpace.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bloggers more urban as well</h3>
<p>According to Nielsen Claritas, the blogging and tweeting community at large isn’t necessarily more affluent, but bloggers and tweeters do live in more urban areas such as New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago. The penetration rates of the top two most visited blogging platforms (Blogger, Wordpress) and the most popular micro-blogging platform (Twitter) show that Nielsen’s 12 Urban lifestyle segments are more likely to blog and tweet than Nielsen’s 22 Town &amp; Rural segments.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly those lifestyle segments most likely to blog and tweet also tend to use Facebook and LinkedIn more often than those segments that typically don’t blog or tweet. Case in point, the Urban lifestyle segments for Blogger are 18% more likely to be Facebook users and 140% more likely to be LinkedIn users than the below average segments.</p>
<h3>About the methodology</h3>
<p>Nielsen examined the seven most-visited social networking websites and platforms:  Facebook, MySpace, Blogger, Twitter, WordPress, ClassmatesOnline, and LinkedIn.  Website penetration by segment was calculated by dividing the number of unique visitors to the website per segment by the total number of households in each segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-more-affluent-and-more-urban-are-more-likely-to-use-social-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teens Don&#8217;t Tweet; Twitter&#8217;s Growth Not Fueled By Youth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/teens-dont-tweet-twitters-growth-not-fueled-by-youth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/teens-dont-tweet-twitters-growth-not-fueled-by-youth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Martin, Vice President, Primary Research / Sue MacDonald, Research Manager
You&#8217;ve probably heard of the Morgan Stanley report that declares &#8220;teenagers do not use Twitter,&#8221; based on a sample size of one 15 year-old intern named Matthew Robson. Morgan Stanley rightfully disclosed that they do not claim that his study is representational or merits statistical accuracy, so we thought we could provide both with our NetRatings panel of 250,000 U.S. Internet users.
Twitter&#8217;s footprint has expanded impressively in the first half of 2009, reaching 10.7 percent of all active Internet users ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>David Martin, Vice President, Primary Research / Sue MacDonald, Research Manager</strong></em></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably heard of the <a href="http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf" target="_blank">Morgan Stanley report</a> that declares &#8220;teenagers do not use Twitter,&#8221; based on a sample size of one 15 year-old intern named Matthew Robson. Morgan Stanley rightfully disclosed that they do not claim that his study is representational or merits statistical accuracy, so we thought we could provide both with our NetRatings panel of 250,000 U.S. Internet users.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Twitter&#8217;s footprint has expanded impressively in the first half of 2009, reaching 10.7 percent of all active Internet users in June. Perhaps even more impressively, this growth has come despite a lack of widespread adoption by children, teens, and young adults. In June 2009, only 16 percent of Twitter.com website users were under the age of 25. Bear in mind persons under 25 make up nearly one quarter of the active US Internet universe, which means that Twitter.com effectively <em>under-indexes</em> on the youth market by 36 percent.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/twitter_by_age.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-14194" title="twitter_by_age" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/twitter_by_age.png" alt="" width="525" height="366" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-14192"></span>While the metrics in the chart above only represent the website and branded &#8220;front door&#8221; of Twitter, it would be a big stretch to assume that the gap in the youth demographic is being made up via other clients and platforms. For example, more than 90 percent of popular Twitter client Tweetdeck&#8217;s audience is over 25.  Furthermore, Twitter.com’s reach is 6.6 percent for kids, teens and young adults, whereas it is 12.1 percent for those over 25; implying that adults are trying Twitter at nearly double the rate.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But does it really matter if the kids don&#8217;t get it? The fact remains that Twitter has grown to be a major online presence and is being driven forward by significant buzz. To illustrate this point: the volume of Twitter mentions on blogs, message boards and forums has reached the same level as Facebook, a property four times its size. We&#8217;ve also seen that Twitter&#8217;s growth is very highly influenced by buzz around current events such as the Iran election. All it takes is one celebrity or major news story to rekindle the Twitter buzz machine, but do these one-off shifts create one-tme curiosity seekers or lead to more permanent users?  That&#8217;s the unanswered question.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/buzz-trends.bmp"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-14236" title="buzz-trends" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/buzz-trends.bmp" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/teens-dont-tweet-twitters-growth-not-fueled-by-youth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vampire Fan Base Runs Thicker Than Blood Online</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/vampire-fan-base-runs-thicker-than-blood-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/vampire-fan-base-runs-thicker-than-blood-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan bases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Blood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vampires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been increasing mainstream interest in and gravitation towards all things vampire, most recently spurred by the Twilight books/movies and the HBO series, True Blood. And even if these aren&#8217;t familiar topics to you yet, marketers are keen to the vampire mystique.
Vampire-related sites are drawing audiences on the Web. In June 2009, the official Twilight movie site was the top online vampire-related destination, garnering 553,000 unique visitors who spent an average of two minutes and 45 seconds on the site during the month (the New Moon trailer is a ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been increasing mainstream interest in and gravitation towards all things vampire, most recently spurred by the Twilight books/movies and the HBO series, <em>True Blood</em>. And even if these aren&#8217;t familiar topics to you yet, marketers are keen to the vampire mystique.</p>
<p>Vampire-related sites are drawing audiences on the Web. In June 2009, the official Twilight movie site was the top online vampire-related destination, garnering 553,000 unique visitors who spent an average of two minutes and 45 seconds on the site during the month (the <em>New Moon</em> trailer is a minute and 47 seconds long). Vampire Wars on Facebook and Vampire Wars on Myspace.com ranked No. 2 and No. 3, with 386,000 and 272,000 unique visitors, respectively.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Vampire Sites Ranked by Unique Audience for June 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Site</th>
<th> Unique Audience</th>
<th> Average Time per Person<br />
(hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Twilight</td>
<td>553,000</td>
<td>0:02:45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Vampire Wars on Facebook</td>
<td>386,000</td>
<td>0:12:23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Vampire Wars on Myspace</td>
<td>272,000</td>
<td>0:37:13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Vampirefreaks.com</td>
<td>225,000</td>
<td>0:17:59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>The Twilight Saga</td>
<td>211,000</td>
<td>0:15:44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Twilight Guide</td>
<td>209,000</td>
<td>0:06:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>truebloodwiki.hbo.com</td>
<td>142,000</td>
<td>0:28:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>watchtrueblood.net</td>
<td>120,000</td>
<td>0:02:06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Twilighters.org</td>
<td>105,000</td>
<td>0:25:34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Vampfangs.com</td>
<td>78,000</td>
<td>0:10:55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p><span id="more-13731"></span>Interestingly, unique visitors to Twilight over-indexed among people between the ages of 25 and 34, despite originally sold as a book series for young adults. Unique visitors 25-34 were nearly twice as likely as the average Web user to visit the site in June. Women are also 44 percent more likely than the average Web users to visit the site.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"> Demographic Profile for Twilight for June 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Demographic Group</th>
<th> Audience Composition Index</th>
<th> Unique Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Male</td>
<td>50</td>
<td>131,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Female</td>
<td>144</td>
<td>422,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">11-Feb</td>
<td>**</td>
<td>**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">17-Dec</td>
<td>159</td>
<td>72,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">18 &#8211; 24</td>
<td>122</td>
<td>61,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">25 &#8211; 34</td>
<td>187</td>
<td>149,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">35 &#8211; 49</td>
<td>98</td>
<td>156,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">50-64</td>
<td>57</td>
<td>71,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">65+</td>
<td>**</td>
<td>**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
**These web sites have insufficient sample sizes for reliable projection of audience size.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<h3>Advertising for True Blood Steps Outside the Box</h3>
<p>When HBO geared up for the second season premiere of True Blood, they hired Digital Kitchen to create an interesting ad campaign that would top the campaign for season one. Digital Kitchen enlisted the help of at least six major brands, from Harley-Davidson to Gillette, to create mock brand ads targeted to vampires. In advance of the new season, HBO increased their online image-based advertising for the show by almost 5,000 month-over-month, displaying 72.3 million online image-based ads in June 2009.</p>
<p>Did all of the advertising create the fervor that HBO was after? While buzz on Twilight eclipsed online discussions surrounding True Blood, there was a surge of conversation after the season two premiere. The number of online mentions nearly tripled the day of the premiere, increasing from .03 percent of all online conversations on the 13th to .07 percent on the 14th, which in turn also helped HBO buzz to increase during the days surrounding the launch of season two.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/vampire_buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13835" title="vampire_buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/vampire_buzz.png" alt="" width="525" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>True Blood Helps Draw Online Video Viewers to HBO&#8217;s Site</h3>
<p>With the second season premiere of True Blood on June 14, HBO experienced double digit growth month-over-month in unique viewers of video online, total video streams viewed, and time spent viewing video online. Total video streams viewed on HBO increased 299 percent, growing from 1.6 million streams in May 2009 to 6.4 million in June. Unique viewers of video increased 101 percent, while time spent viewing online increased 182 percent month-over-month.</p>
<p>While Twilight and True Blood have sparked a surge in interest around vampires, this is not a new phenomenon, but actually just a renewal of interest in these dark characters. Vampires have been a popular subject of fear and intrigue, from <em>Bram Stoker&#8217;s Dracula</em>, to Anne Rice&#8217;s <em>Interview with a Vampire</em>, to today&#8217;s Edward Cullen of <em>Twilight</em>. While the subject is the same, the avenues for connecting with other fans and staying up to date on what&#8217;s new are evolving. While you may have discussed Brad Pitt’s character in Interview over coffee with a friend 15 years ago, today you would share you love of last night’s True Blood episode with friends via Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/vampire-fan-base-runs-thicker-than-blood-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Stats: Myspace Music Growing, Twitter&#8217;s Big Move</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Myspace.com continues its strategic move toward becoming an &#8220;entertainment portal,&#8221; the growth to Myspace Music should help cement their presence in this space. Since the site&#8217;s launch in September 2008, unique visitors to the music.myspace.com subdomain have increased 190 percent &#8212; growing from 4.2 million unique visitors to 12.1 million in June 2009. Year-over-year  traffic to the URL has increased 1,017 percent.
When comparing unique visitors of the music.myspace.com subdomain to other sites within the music category in June, it ranked third behind AOL Music and Yahoo! Music and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Myspace.com continues its strategic move toward becoming an &#8220;entertainment portal,&#8221; the growth to Myspace Music should help cement their presence in this space. Since the site&#8217;s launch in September 2008, unique visitors to the music.myspace.com subdomain have increased 190 percent &#8212; growing from 4.2 million unique visitors to 12.1 million in June 2009. Year-over-year  traffic to the URL has increased 1,017 percent.</p>
<p>When comparing unique visitors of the music.myspace.com subdomain to other sites within the music category in June, it ranked third behind AOL Music and Yahoo! Music and ahead of  popular music sites like MTV Networks Music and Pandora.com.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/musicportals.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13679" title="musicportals" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/musicportals.png" alt="" width="500" height="276" /></a></p>
<p>People between the ages of 12 and 17 were 2.4 time more likely than the average active Internet user to visit music.myspace.com. Visitors between 18 and 24 were 2.2 more likely than the average Internet user to visit the site in June.</p>
<p><span id="more-13678"></span></p>
<p>On the video streaming front, with 120.1 million total streams, Myspace.com was the No. 1 social media site when ranked by streams for June 2009. It was also the No. 1 social networking site when ranked by unique viewers of video content, with 12.9 million viewers for the month. Facebook was the fastest growing social media site by both total video streams and unique viewers of video. Total streams increased 434 percent year-over-year, from 10.1 million streams to 54 million streams. Unique viewers of video increased 397 percent, from 2.4 million in June 2008 to 12 million in June 2009.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/video_streams.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13689" title="video_streams" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/video_streams.png" alt="" width="500" height="166" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/myspace_demo.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13681" title="myspace_demo" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/myspace_demo.png" alt="" width="500" height="246" /></a></p>
<h3>Twitter&#8217;s Big Move</h3>
<p>Among the top 10 social media sites, Twitter.com was again the fastest growing, increasing 1,928 percent year-over-year, from 1 million unique visitors in June 2008 to 21 million unique visitors in June 2009&#8211;making Twitter the fourth most visited member communities site in June. Facebook continued to lead as the No. 1 U.S. social networking site for the sixth month in a row, with 87.3 million unique visitors in June 2009.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/topsites_june09.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13682" title="topsites_june09" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/topsites_june09.png" alt="" width="500" height="343" /></a></p>
<h3>Facebook No. 1 For Time Spent</h3>
<p>Facebook was also the No. 1 social networking site among the top 10 when ranked by average time per person, with visitors spending an average of 4 hours and 33 minutes on the site in June. This is a 240 percent year-over-year increase. The average time per person on Twitter increased 522 percent year-over-year, from 5 minutes and 2 seconds in June 2008 to 31 minutes and 17 seconds in June 2009, making it the fastest growing by time per person among the top 10.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timespent_june091.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13688" title="timespent_june091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timespent_june091.png" alt="" width="500" height="355" /></a></p>
<p><strong>*Note:</strong> <em>Effective with June 2009 data reporting, Nielsen has made several <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-launches-expanded-web-measurement-panel/">enhancements</a> to the NetView and VideoCensus services, including a panel that is 8 times larger, more granular reporting and improved accuracy and representativeness. These enhancements provide the highest quality data to our clients and the marketplace. For some sites, trending of previously-reported data with current results may show percentage differences attributable to these product enhancements and should only be compared directionally.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record Buzz for Jackson Showcases Increased Media Integration</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-buzz-for-jackson-signifies-increased-media-integration/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-buzz-for-jackson-signifies-increased-media-integration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three screen report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Jackson&#8217;s death and related events has drawn the most online buzz in Internet history.  News of his death on June 25 broke daily records, capturing nearly 8 percent of all conversations on the web.  Buzz surrounding Jackson&#8217;s July 7 public memorial (which drew 31.1 million TV viewers) ranks as the third most-discussed topic online ever at more than 3 percent of conversations and early data for July 8 indicates that yesterday&#8217;s traffic record may already be eclipsed by today&#8217;s ongoing discussion.  The one other event to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Jackson&#8217;s death and related events has drawn the most online buzz in Internet history.  News of his death on June 25 broke daily records, capturing nearly 8 percent of all conversations on the web.  Buzz surrounding Jackson&#8217;s July 7 public memorial (which drew 31.1 million TV viewers) ranks as the third most-discussed topic online ever at more than 3 percent of conversations and early data for July 8 indicates that yesterday&#8217;s traffic record may already be eclipsed by today&#8217;s ongoing discussion.  The one other event to see this level of discussion was the inauguration of President Obama with roughly 5 percent of all online discussion.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/2009_buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13429" title="2009_buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/2009_buzz.png" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>As fans discussed the emotional and musical details of the memorial, the media coverage and the integration between television and the internet was also a major topic. Nearly 15% of all online discussions about Jackson referenced either a broadcast or social network.</p>
<p><span id="more-13423"></span>CNN which teamed up with Facebook on streaming coverage was named in 5% of all online conversations. Also on the TV network side, BET came in 2nd with 1.9%, ABC with 1.7%, MTV with 1.44%, NBC/MSNBC with 1.43%, Fox with 1.38% and CBS with 1.0%. Among social networks, Twitter was the most discussed social networking site with 2.4%. Facebook was mentioned in 2% of the conversations, followed by Youtube (1.9%) Myspace (0.6%) and Hulu (0.3%) which streamed FOX News coverage.</p>
<p>&#8220;While events like the Jackson memorial, or the Obama inauguration are unique, the way consumers are multitasking between media is quickly becoming the norm,&#8221; says Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &amp; Analytics, Nielsen Online. &#8220;Even as recently as five years ago, the only choice for community was to gather around the TV screen with co-workers or friends for major events. Now, there are three screens to choose from and, as our research shows, online activity actually reinforces TV viewing. So when outlets like CNN integrate their coverage with Facebook or MSNBC leans heavily on Twitter it demonstrates the public’s growing integrated use of TV, the web, and mobile for getting, and at times reporting, the news.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Twitter Doesn&#8217;t Fail Tweeters</h3>
<p>Terms and tags such as #MJ and #Michael Jackson dominated the top trends on Twitter.com yesterday, July 7, 2009. Interestingly, even the misspelling of the King of Pop’s first name as “micheal” also topped trends throughout the day.</p>
<p>Users watch the events of the day unfold on TV and online, often “tweeting” about the coverage offered by various media outlets. Since many were limited to watching coverage online while at work, Twitter featured frequent links and recommendations for live video feeds, most commonly CNN’s live feed with Facebook integration, followed by CBS News/Ustream, MSN, and MSNBC.</p>
<p>During the memorial service, recommendations and links to video stream slowed down, and viewers began to focus more of their “tweets” on the performances at the service, only distracted by news that social media sites Facebook.com and Twitter.com were out of capacity and/or had crashed. However, CNN.com did continue to be the most recommended live feed during programming. Following programming, recommendations shifted to video recordings posted on YouTube.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-buzz-for-jackson-signifies-increased-media-integration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Iran Election and Social Media: The New News Revolution</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/the-iran-election-and-social-media-the-new-news-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/the-iran-election-and-social-media-the-new-news-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analysis by Emily Luger, Nielsen Online
The Iranian election is yet another watershed moment in the ongoing evolution of news and media, further blurring the lines between being, reporting, and following the story. In the two weeks since the controversy and conflict surrounding the election, a number of insights have emerged about how the Internet and social media continue to be a transforming force for the News industry. Initial Nielsen analysis of search results provides some conclusions, while others areas beg additional probing.
Findings from an  Internet snapshot from June 18, 2009:

Wikipedia ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Analysis by Emily Luger, Nielsen Online</em><br />
The Iranian election is yet another watershed moment in the ongoing evolution of news and media, further blurring the lines between being, reporting, and following the story. In the two weeks since the controversy and conflict surrounding the election, a number of insights have emerged about how the Internet and social media continue to be a transforming force for the News industry. Initial Nielsen analysis of search results provides some conclusions, while others areas beg additional probing.</p>
<h3>Findings from an  Internet snapshot from June 18, 2009:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Wikipedia emerges within the top two search results for 4/5 of the leading topics.</li>
<li>At least one social media source emerges within the top 10 search results for every term. In most cases, the social media sites emerge directly above a traditional, major news source, such as WSJ.com.</li>
</ul>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6">Google Search Results: Est. 2:30 PM Thursday, June 18, 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Iran</th>
<th> Iran Protest</th>
<th> Iran<br />
Election</th>
<th> Moussavi</th>
<th> Ahmadinejad</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>MSNBC</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>WSJ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BBC</td>
<td>MSNBC</td>
<td>Yahoo</td>
<td>Earthtimes.org</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>Yahoo</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>Ahmadinejad.ir</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>YahooNews</td>
<td>AlJezeera</td>
<td>MSNBC</td>
<td>Presstv.ir</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>InfoPlease</td>
<td>GlobalVoices</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>Ft.com</td>
<td>Yahoo</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>IranDaily</td>
<td>WashingtonTimes</td>
<td>Presstv.ir</td>
<td>Economist.com/blogs</td>
<td>Boing Boing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Tehran.edu</td>
<td>AFP Google Article</td>
<td>NY Times</td>
<td>Middleeast.about.com</td>
<td>Politico.com</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Memory.loc.gov</td>
<td>NY Times</td>
<td>BBC</td>
<td>Gsd.harvard</td>
<td>CNN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Books.Google.com</td>
<td>Riehlworldview.com</td>
<td>HuffingtonPost</td>
<td>Personaldemocracy</td>
<td>Time.com</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Guardian</td>
<td>Rightwingnews.com</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>Washingtonindependent</td>
<td>Google Video</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">11</td>
<td></td>
<td>Sdnn.com</td>
<td>WSJ</td>
<td>Propeller.com</td>
<td>Aljezeera</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">12</td>
<td></td>
<td>BBC</td>
<td>SFGate</td>
<td>NY Times</td>
<td>Iranian.ws</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">13</td>
<td></td>
<td>Commentary</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td></td>
<td>Washington Post</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">14</td>
<td></td>
<td>iran.whyweprotest.net</td>
<td>Guardian.co.uk</td>
<td></td>
<td>Reuters</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">15</td>
<td></td>
<td>Washington Post</td>
<td>Mashable</td>
<td></td>
<td>Globalsecurity.org</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">16</td>
<td></td>
<td>Theage.com.au</td>
<td>Foxnews</td>
<td></td>
<td>MSNBC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">17</td>
<td></td>
<td>Euronews.net</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Stopahmadinejad</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --><br />
<span id="more-13148"></span><br />
In a follow-up snapshot on June 24, a marked shift takes place, reaffirming the Iran election story as a watershed moment for online news and communications:</p>
<ul>
<li>YouTube emerges within the top 10 search results for all search terms in the second week.</li>
<li>Wikipedia remains within the top three search results in the second week for four of the five search terms.</li>
<li>Twitter emerges within the top 20 search results in week two – specifically, the Twitter results for Moussavi and Ahmadinejad. Of course, traditional news sources such as the BBC (and CNN, in week two) bubble to the top of search results, as do general information sites such as Yahoo.com and Infoplease.com.</li>
</ul>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6"> Google Search Results: Est. 3:30 PM Wednesday, June 24, 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Iran</th>
<th> Iran Protest</th>
<th> Iran Election</th>
<th> Moussavi</th>
<th> Ahmadinejad</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>Minneapolis Star</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>CIA.gov</td>
<td>Telegraph.co.uk</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>Earthtimes.org</td>
<td>Ahmadinejadjr.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Topics.nyimes</td>
<td>Iran.whyweprotest.net</td>
<td>Mashable</td>
<td>Presstv.ir</td>
<td>Guardian</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>Guardian</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>English.aljazeera</td>
<td>Theledeblogs.<br />
nytimes.com</td>
<td>BoingBoing</td>
<td>MiamiHerald.com</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Guardian</td>
<td>BBC</td>
<td>Yahoo</td>
<td>FT.com</td>
<td>Csmonitor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>BBC</td>
<td>NPR</td>
<td>Guardian</td>
<td>Cjr.org</td>
<td>Yahoo</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Iran-Daily</td>
<td>Albawaba.com</td>
<td>Presstv.ir</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>TIME</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Yahoo</td>
<td>MSNBC.com</td>
<td>Huffington Post</td>
<td>Attackerman.<br />
firedoglake</td>
<td>CNN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Infoplease</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>Washington Post</td>
<td>Blogs.tnr.com</td>
<td>Globalsecurity.org</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">11</td>
<td></td>
<td>Yahoo News</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>washingtonindependent</td>
<td>English.aljazeera</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">12</td>
<td></td>
<td>FoxNews</td>
<td>Energyoutlook.<br />
blogspot</td>
<td>Blog.archpaper.com</td>
<td>Twitter.com/<br />
ahmadinejad</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">13</td>
<td></td>
<td>Reuters</td>
<td>Lewrockwell.com</td>
<td>Blog.beliefnet.com</td>
<td>Politico.com</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">14</td>
<td></td>
<td>Globalvoicesonline</td>
<td>BBC</td>
<td>Twitter.com/<br />
mousavi1388</td>
<td>NY Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">15</td>
<td></td>
<td>Cryptome.org</td>
<td>WSJ</td>
<td>Monstersandcritics.com</td>
<td>Washington Post</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">16</td>
<td></td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>FOX News</td>
<td></td>
<td>MSNBC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">17</td>
<td></td>
<td>CBS News</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Stopahmadinejad</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>What this means is that general human curiosity is driving people to look to all available sources for information.  The conflict in Iran presenting the latest and perhaps most sophisticated example of how the world has changed for journalists, the media and <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/watch">increasingly active</a> media consumers alike.</p>
<p>So what else do the search results signify?  Is consumer generated media (news by the people, for the people) eclipsing traditional sources? Are people more frequently linking to Wikipedia than the New York Times for information about Iran? What does it mean that Mashable is among the top three search results for “Iran Election?” What role does Twitter play? As major events break (Iran, Health Care, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/michael-jackson-news-dominates-web-buzz/">Michael Jackson</a>) we will continue to dive into the data and present answers to these questions, both through our own analysis and through feedback and opinions of others. After all, if weve learned anything in the last few weeks, it&#8217;s that the power is in the hands of the people&#8230;  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/the-iran-election-and-social-media-the-new-news-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Grows 1,444% Over Last Year; Time on Site Up 175%</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/twitter-grows-1444-over-last-year-time-on-site-up-175/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/twitter-grows-1444-over-last-year-time-on-site-up-175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 2009 data from Nielsen Online shows that people continue to spend more time on social networking and blog sites than ever before, with total minutes increasing 82 percent year-over-year and the average time per person increasing 67 percent year-over-year in May 2009. Twitter.com was the fastest-growing Web brand in May 2009, increasing 1,448 percent year over- year, from 1.2 million unique visitors in May 2008 to 18.2 million in 2009. Despite being the fastest-growing brand year-over-year, Twitter&#8217;s month-over-month growth has begun to slow, increasing 7 percent from April. The ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nielsen_pr_090619.pdf">May 2009 data</a> from Nielsen Online shows that people continue to spend more time on social networking and blog sites than ever before, with total minutes increasing 82 percent year-over-year and the average time per person increasing 67 percent year-over-year in May 2009. Twitter.com was the fastest-growing Web brand in May 2009, increasing 1,448 percent year over- year, from 1.2 million unique visitors in May 2008 to 18.2 million in 2009. Despite being the fastest-growing brand year-over-year, Twitter&#8217;s month-over-month growth has begun to slow, increasing 7 percent from April. The average time per person on Twitter increased 175 percent year-over-year, from 6 minutes and 19 seconds in May 2008 to 17 minutes and 21 seconds in May 2009. However, month-over-month growth was flat, decreasing one percent from April 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/twitter_time.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12946" title="twitter_time" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/twitter_time.png" alt="" width="500" height="268" /></a></p>
<h3>Facebook and Myspace Stats</h3>
<ul>
<li>With 144.3 million unique visitors, Facebook was the No. 1 global social networking destination in May 2009—the 7th month in a row that Facebook has ranked No. 1</li>
<li>May 2009 also marked the 5th month in a row that Facebook has been the No. 1 social<br />
networking site in the U.S., garnering 75.4 million unique visitors—a 190 percent increase<br />
over May 2008</li>
<li>Myspace.com continued as the top social networking site when ranked by total video<br />
streams in May, with 116.1 million video streams</li>
<li>Unique viewers of video content at Myspace.com increased 22.9 percent month-over-month,<br />
from 9.9 million in April 2009 to 12.2 million in May 2009.</li>
</ul>
<p>Download Nielsen Online&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nielsen_pr_090619.pdf">May 2009 data</a> on social networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/twitter-grows-1444-over-last-year-time-on-site-up-175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen&#8217;s Jon Gibs Discusses Social Networking with Fox Business</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-jon-gibs-discusses-social-networking-with-fox-business/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-jon-gibs-discusses-social-networking-with-fox-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 4, Jon Gibs, Vice President, Media and Agency Insights, Nielsen Online, discussed stickiness, the social networking ecosystem, and online advertising with Fox Business.

 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 4, Jon Gibs, Vice President, Media and Agency Insights, Nielsen Online, discussed stickiness, the social networking ecosystem, and online advertising with Fox Business.</p>
<div align="center">
<p id="gibsfox"><script src="/nielsenwire/videos/swfobject.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript"><!--
var s1 = new SWFObject('/nielsenwire/videos/player.swf','player','400','300','9');
s1.addParam('allowfullscreen','false');
s1.addParam('allowscriptaccess','always');
s1.addParam('flashvars','file=/nielsenwire/videos/gibs_on_fox.flv&#038;image=/nielsenwire/videos/nielsen_video_tn.png');
s1.write('gibsfox');
// --></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-jon-gibs-discusses-social-networking-with-fox-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
