<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Friends &amp; Frenemies: Why We Add and Remove Facebook Friends</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/friends-frenemies-why-we-add-and-remove-facebook-friends/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/friends-frenemies-why-we-add-and-remove-facebook-friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To friend or to de-friend, that is the question. New research from NM Incite, a Nielsen McKinsey company, reveals that there are innumerable factors that help Facebook users decide to add a friend or cull someone from the fold, though knowing someone in real life is the top reason cited for friend-ing someone (82%) and offensive comments are the main reason someone gets the boot (55%).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To friend or to de-friend, that is the question. New research from <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen McKinsey company, reveals that there are innumerable factors that help Facebook users decide to add a friend or cull someone from the fold, though knowing someone in real life is the top reason cited for friend-ing someone (82%) and offensive comments are the main reason someone gets the boot (55%).</p>
<p>Research suggests that real world interactions drive online friendships. Meanwhile, sales-oriented and depressing comments help drive friend removals. Facebook etiquette also plays a role, with updating too often, too little or having too many friends a consideration for some Facebook users.</p>
<p>Social media activity also plays a role in these decisions, as research indicates that men are more likely to use social media for careers/networking and dating – while women use social media for a creative outlet, to get coupons/promos or to give positive feedback. More men add friends based on business networks or physical attractiveness and women are more likely to friend based on knowing someone in real life or remove them due to offensive comments.</p>
<p>Below is an infographic outlining the various reasons for adding or removing Facebook friends and a breakdown of social media activity:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nmincite.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/nmIncite_fb-add-remov-4083-31.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6083" title="nmIncite_fb-add-remov-4083-3" src="http://www.nmincite.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/nmIncite_fb-add-remov-4083-31.gif" alt="" width="575" height="1173" /></a></p>
<p><em><em>*Methodology: </em>NM Incite, State of Social Media Survey (April 2011). NM Incite’s ‘State of Social Media Survey’ is based on a representative sample of 1,865 adult (18+) social media users who were recruited from the Nielsen Online Panel to take an online survey. “Social media user” is defined as participating, talking, and networking online through various platforms to share information and resources. This includes Internet forums, blogs, Facebook, Twitter, video sharing, consumer rating and other social networking websites. The survey fielded from March 31 to April 14th.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/friends-frenemies-why-we-add-and-remove-facebook-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App-Happy with Android: The Most Popular Android Apps by Age</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/app-happy-with-android-the-most-popular-android-apps-by-age/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/app-happy-with-android-the-most-popular-android-apps-by-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angry Birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook and apps from Google like Gmail and the Android Market are the most popular smartphone apps among Android owners according to Nielsen’s latest research on smartphone usage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook and apps from Google like Gmail and the Android Market are the most popular smartphone apps among Android owners 18 years and older in the U.S. according to Nielsen’s latest research on smartphone usage.  To rank mobile apps by active reach, that is, by the percentage of Android owners who used the app within the past 30 days, Nielsen analyzed usage data from its proprietary device meters on the smartphones of the thousands of consumer panelists who agreed to be part of Nielsen’s ongoing Smartphone Analytics research.</p>
<p><strong>Staying Social</strong><br />
Facebook’s popular app is the most active among Android owners 18-24 and 25-34, who both hover at around an 80 percent active reach. Additionally, more than three quarters of users 35-44 used the app recently as well.</p>
<p>Google’s YouTube app gets heavy usage from Android smartphone owners 18 -24: 64 percent have used it in the past 30 days, compared to 56 percent and 51 percent of 25-34 and 35-44 year olds. A preference for media apps with a social dimension (e.g. Words with Friends) among the 18-24 set is also reinforced by their sizable usage of music and video apps (e.g. Pandora) compared to older demographics.</p>
<p><strong>Play Time</strong><br />
Not just for the kids, the ubiquitous game, Angry Birds, appeals more to those 35-44 when compared to other age groups: 35 percent of them have used the app in the last 30 days, while only 22 percent of those 18-24 and 29 percent of 25-34 year-olds launched the game.</p>
<p><strong>Apps and More for Sale</strong><br />
Apart from gaming, the 35-44 segment demonstrates a greater inclination to shop using the Amazon AppStore: 24 percent of them used the app in the last 30 days, while only 14 percent of those 18-24 did the same. Groupon appeals more to those 25-34, not even making the top 20 ranking for those 18-24.  A similar trend was found on Google+: active reach was higher for those 25 and older when compared to the 18-24 demographic.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/android-apps-by-age.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30328" title="android-apps-by-age" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/android-apps-by-age.png" alt="android-apps-by-age" width="575" height="504" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/app-happy-with-android-the-most-popular-android-apps-by-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40% of Tablet and Smartphone Owners Use Them While Watching TV</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/40-of-tablet-and-smartphone-owners-use-them-while-watching-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/40-of-tablet-and-smartphone-owners-use-them-while-watching-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross platform viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eReaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simultaneous viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American consumers are increasingly connected, and our recent survey shows they are increasingly multimedia multitasking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American consumers are increasingly connected and our recent survey shows they are increasingly multitasking when it comes to multimedia.</p>
<p>Roughly 40 percent of tablet and smartphone owners in the U.S. used their devices daily while watching TV, while only 14 percent of eReader owners said they watched TV while using their device every day.</p>
<p>And what are smartphone and tablet owners doing while watching TV?   Checking email.  Email was the top activity for both men and women during television programming and commercial breaks. In addition, women reported engaging in social networking more than men, while men checked sports scores more often.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/q2_2011-simultaneous-usage-cm11-3943.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29565" title="q2_2011-simultaneous-usage-cm11-3943" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/q2_2011-simultaneous-usage-cm11-3943.png" alt="q2_2011-simultaneous-usage-cm11-3943" width="516" height="848" /></a></p>
<p>Advertisers should take note that while viewers may be splitting attention between two (or three!) screens, 19 percent of smartphone and tablet owners searched for product information and 13 percent searched for coupons or deals while the television was on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/40-of-tablet-and-smartphone-owners-use-them-while-watching-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deal Me In: Behind the Bargain-Hunting Audiences of Local Deal Sites</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/deal-me-in-behind-the-bargain-hunting-audiences-of-local-deal-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/deal-me-in-behind-the-bargain-hunting-audiences-of-local-deal-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily deal sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With new daily deal sites entering the fray on a regular basis, The Nielsen Company took a look at this popular genre, revealing who Groupon and Living Social’s audiences are and what couponers online want.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on two major trends—hyperlocalism and budget consciousness—daily deal sites in the U.S. have changed the business landscape, shifting how consumers search for bargains and connect with businesses large and small, national and local. With new daily deal sites entering the fray on a regular basis, The Nielsen Company took a look at the audiences of two major players, Groupon and Living Social,  and what online couponers really want.</p>
<p><strong>U.S. Audience Profile: Groupon and Living Social</strong></p>
<p>Visitors to Groupon and Living Social are similar in that nearly two-thirds are female and more likely than the average U.S. Internet user to be affluent.  Living Social’s visitors trend slightly more affluent and more educated than Groupon’s with 46 percent having a Bachelor’s or Post-Graduate degree, compared to 39 percent for Groupon (the national average for Internet users is 25%).  Visitors to Living Social are also 49 percent more likely than the average American online to make $150,000 or more, while Groupon’s visitors are 30 percent more likely.</p>
<p>Although the audiences to both sites share a similar gender and socioeconomic split, there are notable differences in the age and geographic location of their U.S. visitors.  Groupon has a higher concentration of visitors aged 35-64 (57 percent compared to 51 percent for Living Social), with the Internet average being 48 percent. Living Social has a higher concentration of younger visitors with 21-34 year olds making up 33 percent of their audience compared to 25 percent for Groupon and 21 percent across the entire web.</p>
<p>While both sites offer deals in many cities across the country, Groupon is most likely to have visitors from the Northeast while Living Social has a high concentration of visitors in the South and Pacific regions.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27356" title="U.S. Audience Composition Index by Region" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Daily-Deal-Sites-CHART.JPG" alt="U.S. Audience Composition Index by Region" width="572" height="426" /></p>
<p><strong>What deals to offer?</strong></p>
<p>To secure and to grow their slice of the consumer pie, it’s important for daily deal players to understand what their audiences want so that they can offer relevant deals.  Among adults online who visit Coupons/Rewards websites, nearly half are interested in gardening, while roughly one-third are interested in home repair/renovation, religious involvement and landscaping.  Other standouts include knitting/sewing (Coupons/Rewards site visitors are 19% more likely than the average adult Internet user to be interested) and gourmet cooking (18% more likely).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"> Coupons/Rewards Site Visitors: Home and Lifestyle Interests</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Interest</th>
<th> % of Coupons/Rewards<br />
Site Visitors</th>
<th> Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Gardening</td>
<td>46.5</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Home Repair / Renovation</td>
<td>35.2</td>
<td>106</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Religious Involvement</td>
<td>33.5</td>
<td>107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Landscaping</td>
<td>31.8</td>
<td>107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Playing Non-computer Video Games</td>
<td>29.6</td>
<td>98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Gourmet Cooking</td>
<td>29.0</td>
<td>118</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Volunteer / Charity Work</td>
<td>29.0</td>
<td>117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Photography (as a hobby)</td>
<td>23.6</td>
<td>117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Crafts</td>
<td>20.7</td>
<td>118</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Knitting / Sewing</td>
<td>20.1</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Read as: 47% of adults online who visited Coupons/Rewards sites are interested in gardening, 9% more likely than the average adult online</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p><strong>The Social Incentive</strong></p>
<p>With sharing deals with friends an important part of the business model for many daily deal sites—Living Social gives a free deal when enough friends purchase from your link while Groupon offers a monetary credit for the same—it’s important to understand how consumers interact online, including their activity on social networking sites.</p>
<p>Daily deal players might be pleased to know that adults online who visit Coupons/Rewards sites are not only more likely than the average adult online to have multiple social networking profiles (12% more likely), but also significantly more likely (33%) to post links, websites, articles and videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/deal-me-in-behind-the-bargain-hunting-audiences-of-local-deal-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Celebrity Fans More Likely to Follow Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/online-celebrity-fans-more-likely-to-follow-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/online-celebrity-fans-more-likely-to-follow-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[64% of adult Internet users who follow a celebrity also follow a brand - five times more likely to do so than all adults online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s no doubt that a celebrity endorser is a valuable asset to a brand &#8211; <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/celebrity-ads-among-most-memorable-of-2011-oscar-commercials-listerine-tops-list-of-most-watched-ads/">during this year’s Oscars telecast, 4 of the 10 most-watched commercials featured a celebrity spokesperson</a>.  On the Internet, this trend continues as advertisers increasingly leverage social networking and celebrities to attract consumers. On  Twitter and Facebook, celebrities can have fans and followers in the millions &#8211; actor Charlie Sheen, for example, recently joined Twitter and in just three days set a new record for fastest to reach a million followers – further proving the power of celebrity.</p>
<p>Celebrities can be valuable to advertisers, but so too can the people who follow  them on social media websites. According to The Nielsen Company, 64 percent of adult U.S. <span style="color: red;"> </span>Internet users who follow a celebrity also follow a  brand – this means the celebrity follower is four times more likely to follow a  brand than the average U.S. adult online.  Additionally, Nielsen found that such fans are also more likely to offer advice and opinion to fellow online consumers. This is particularly the case when it comes to entertainment topics where 32 percent of celebrity fans online provide advice on movies (making them 44% more likely than the average  online user to do so), and 28 percent provide guidance on music (56%  more likely) and television programs (34% more likely).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"> Topics Online Celebrity Fans/ Followers Most Likely to Provide Advice On<br />
(U.S. Adults Online)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Category</th>
<th> % of Celebrity Fans/Followers</th>
<th> Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Movies</td>
<td>31.7</td>
<td>144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Music</td>
<td>28.1</td>
<td>156</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Television Programs</td>
<td>27.6</td>
<td>134</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Websites / Internet Content &amp; Services</td>
<td>24.3</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Food &amp; Beverages</td>
<td>19.0</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Electronics</td>
<td>18.5</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Computer Hardware/Software</td>
<td>17.9</td>
<td>138</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Books</td>
<td>17.6</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Restaurants or Bars</td>
<td>16.0</td>
<td>126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Video Games</td>
<td>15.6</td>
<td>157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Read as: 32% of U.S. adult fans of celebrities online frequently provide advice on movies, 44% more likely than the average adult online</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Fans of celebrities are also valuable consumers in other areas of online –  particularly when it comes to transactions or purchases.  One quarter also used the web to conduct personal banking transactions and manage their credit card accounts, more likely to do so than the average adult online.  Top online purchases among these online fans included clothing/shoes/accessories (18.2%), music (13.8%), and books (13.6%).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-26745    aligncenter" title="Top Online Transactions/Purchases" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/top-online-transactions-purchases.JPG" alt="Top Online Transactions/Purchases" width="345" height="438" /></p>
<p>Top online activities among fans of celebrities included emailing, paying bills, and of course, social networking.  Of these top online activities, celebrity fans were significantly more likely than the average adult online to comment/post on social networking sites (86% more likely), view consumer generated video (83% more likely), visit a social networking site (67% more likely) and play online games (45%  more likely).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-26749  aligncenter" title="Top Online Activities" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/top-online-activities.JPG" alt="Top Online Activities" width="342" height="441" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">Note: Nielsen&#8217;s findings are based on data from @Plan Release 4 2010.  @Plan is a quarterly survey of approximately 36,000 U.S. Internet users age 18 and older fused with Nielsen&#8217;s NetView Internet usage from 3rd quarter 2010.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/online-celebrity-fans-more-likely-to-follow-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Americans Do Online: Social Media And Games Dominate Activity</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/what-americans-do-online-social-media-and-games-dominate-activity/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/what-americans-do-online-social-media-and-games-dominate-activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans spend nearly a quarter of their time online on social networking sites and blogs, up from 15.8 percent just a year ago (a 43 percent increase) according to new research released today from The Nielsen Company. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Text and graphics updated Aug. 6 to clarify category definitions, timeframe and methodology (see note at bottom)</em></strong></p>
<p>Americans spend nearly a quarter of their time online on social networking sites and blogs, up from 15.8 percent just a year ago (43 percent increase) according to new research released today from The Nielsen Company. The research revealed that Americans spend a third their online time (36 percent) communicating and networking across social networks, blogs, personal email and instant messaging.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> Top 10 Sectors by Share of U.S. Internet Time</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Category</th>
<th> Share of Time<br />
June 2010</th>
<th> Share of Time<br />
June 2009</th>
<th> % Change in<br />
Share of Time</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Social Networks</td>
<td>22.7%</td>
<td>15.8%</td>
<td>43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Online Games</td>
<td>10.2%</td>
<td>9.3%</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>E-mail</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
<td>11.5%</td>
<td>-28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Portals</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
<td>-19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Instant Messaging</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>-15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Videos/Movies**</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Search</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
<td>1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Software Manufacturers</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Multi-category Entertainment</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>-7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Classifieds/Auctions</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>-2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>Other*</td>
<td>34.3%</td>
<td>37.3%</td>
<td>-8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source:Nielsen NetView &#8211; June 2009-June 2010<br />
*Other refers to 74 remaining online categories visited from PC/laptops<br />
**NetView&#8217;s Videos/Movies category refers to time spent on video-specific (e.g., YouTube, Bing Videos, Hulu) and movie-related websites (e.g., IMDB, MSN Movies and Netflix) only. It is not a measure of video streaming or inclusive of video streaming on non-video-specific or movie-specific websites (e.g., streamed video on sports or news sites).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>“Despite the almost unlimited nature of what you can do on the web, 40 percent of U.S. online time is spent on just three activities – social networking, playing games and emailing leaving a whole lot of other sectors fighting for a declining share of the online pie,” said Nielsen analyst Dave Martin.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/us-time-spent-online-new1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23418" title="us-time-spent-online-new" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/us-time-spent-online-new1.png" alt="us-time-spent-online-new" width="575" height="625" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/us-hrs-spent-new1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23417" title="us-hrs-spent-new" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/us-hrs-spent-new1.png" alt="us-hrs-spent-new" width="575" height="492" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Additional findings include:</strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li style="text-align: left;">Online games overtook personal email to become the second most heavily used activity behind social networks &#8211; accounting for 10 percent of all U.S. Internet time. Email dropped from 11.5 percent of time to 8.3 percent. <span style="color: #999999;">(Source: Nielsen NetView)</span></li>
<li>Of the most heavily-used sectors, Videos/Movies (which includes video-specific and movie-related websites only – and is not inclusive of video streaming behavior elsewhere) was the only other to experience a significant growth in share of U.S. activity online. Its share of activity grew relatively by 12 percent from 3.5 to 3.9 percent. <span style="color: #999999;">(Source: Nielsen NetView)</span></li>
<li>June 2010 was a major milestone for U.S. online video as the number of videos streamed passed the 10 billion mark. The average American consumer streaming online video spent 3 hours 15 minutes doing so during the month. <span style="color: #999999;">(Source: Nielsen VideoCensus)</span></li>
<li>Despite some predictions otherwise, the rise of social networking hasn’t pushed email and instant messaging into obscurity just yet. Although both saw double-digit declines in share of time, email remains as the third heaviest activity online (8.3 percent share of time) while instant messaging is fifth, accounting for four percent of Americans online time. <span style="color: #999999;">(Source: Nielsen NetView)</span></li>
<li>Although the major portals also experienced a double digit decline in share, they remained as the fourth heaviest activity, accounting for 4.4 percent of U.S. time online. <span style="color: #999999;">(Source: Nielsen NetView)</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Email Remains Top on Mobile Internet Activities<br />
</strong>The way U.S. consumers spend their Internet time on their mobile phones paints a slightly different picture to that of Internet use from computers. In a Nielsen survey of mobile web users, there is a double-digit (28 percent) rise in the prevalence of social networking behavior, but the dominance of email activity on mobile devices continue with an increase from 37.4 percent to 41.6 percent of U.S. mobile Internet time.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/us-mobile-time-spent-new.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23400" title="us-mobile-time-spent-new" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/us-mobile-time-spent-new.png" alt="us-mobile-time-spent-new" width="575" height="620" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Portals remain as the second heaviest activity on mobile Internet (11.6 percent share of time), despite their double digit decline and social networking’s rise to account for 10.5 percent share means the gap is much smaller than a year ago (14.3 percent vs. 8.3 percent).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Other mobile Internet activities seeing significant growth include music and video/movies, both seeing 20 percent plus increases in share of activity year over year. As these destinations gain share, it’s at the cost of other content consumption &#8211; both news/current events and sports destinations saw more than a 20 percent drop in share of U.S. mobile Internet time.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">“Although we see similar characteristics amongst PC and mobile internet use, the way their activity is allocated is still pretty contrasting, added Martin.  While convergence will continue, the unique characteristics of computers and mobiles, both in their features and when and where they are used mean that mobile Internet behavior mirroring its PC counterpart is still some way off.”</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #808080;">NOTE: This piece of research looked at the share of all U.S. Internet time each of the 84 “standard” NetView subcategories/sectors holds. Only the top 10 sectors were actually called out, the remaining 74 were grouped into “other” and not called out. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #808080;">The Mobile Internet data is derived from a survey which tracks self-reported mobile internet usage from over 5,000 respondents each month.  Mobile internet universe is defined as people that they have used the mobile internet, email or instant messaging on their mobile phone in the past 30 days. The Mobile internet data is weighted back to benchmarks for age, gender, income, race/ethnicity and operator share collected in Mobile Insights</span><em><span style="color: #808080;">.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/what-americans-do-online-social-media-and-games-dominate-activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webinar Recap: Asia Pacific Social Media Trends</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/webinar-recap-asia-pacific-social-media-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/webinar-recap-asia-pacific-social-media-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growth in consumers’ use of social media is changing the media landscape across the world. In Asia Pacific it has become increasingly important for advertisers to understand what is driving this change and leverage its growing popularity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Growth in consumers’ use of social media is changing the media landscape  across the world. In Asia Pacific it has become increasingly important  for advertisers to understand what is driving this change and leverage its growing popularity. <a href="http://www.nmincite.com" target="_blank">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, has  undertaken an <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-dominates-asia-pacific-internet-usage/">inaugural study</a> of usage and trends across the Asia  Pacific region’s major markets. A recent webinar took an in-depth look at  the results of this study, answering some of the questions  affecting North American and Global marketers today.</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Download the <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/events-webinars/2010/webinar-asia-pacific-social-media-trends.html">Asia Pacific Social Media Trends</a> webinar and related materials.</span></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/webinar-recap-asia-pacific-social-media-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Dominates Asia Pacific Internet Usage</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-dominates-asia-pacific-internet-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-dominates-asia-pacific-internet-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media usage has seen unprecedented growth in Asia Pacific in the past year and is now one of the most critical trends in the online sector, according to Nielsen's Asia Pacific Social Media Report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media usage has seen unprecedented growth in Asia Pacific in the past year and is now one of the most critical trends in the online sector, according to Nielsen&#8217;s Asia Pacific Social Media Report.</p>
<p>The survey found that three of the seven biggest global online brands are social media sites – Facebook, Wikipedia and YouTube. Close to three quarters of the world’s Internet population (74%) have now visited a social networking/blogging site, and Internet users are spending an average of almost six hours per month on social media sites.</p>
<p>Social media is having an increasing impact on consumers’ purchasing decisions – in Asia Pacific, online product reviews are the third most trusted source of information when making purchase decisions, behind family and friends. This is particularly so for purchases of consumer electronics, cosmetics and cars – products where consumers are most likely to base their purchase decisions on online product reviews. But not ever country shares the same way.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/positive-negative-reviews.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-22902" title="positive-negative-reviews" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/positive-negative-reviews.png" alt="positive-negative-reviews" width="575" height="450" /></a></p>
<p><strong>REPORT HIGHLIGHTS</strong></p>
<p><strong>Blogging&#8230; it&#8217;s Big in Japan</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Japanese Internet users are the most avid bloggers globally, posting more than one million blogs per month, significantly more than any other country in the region.</li>
<li>Japan’s adoption of Twitter continues to grow, with unique visitor numbers increasing in the last year from less than 200,000 to more than 10 million.</li>
<li>Sixteen percent of Japanese Internet users now use Twitter, which compares to 10 percent in the U.S.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Grass roots celebrities attract China’s social networkers</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Bulletin board systems underpin popular social media behavior in China – more than 80 percent of social media content is bulletin board systems.</li>
<li>Social media games are used as a stimuli to drive new users and gain reach with existing users, while content sharing behaviors are more popular among the more experienced users. Virtual product placement within social networking site games is becoming one of the most profitable methods of revenue for social networking sites.</li>
<li>‘Grass roots’ celebrity tracking dominates online conversations in China, with social media celebrities such as Sister Phoenix and Mr. Yuan outperforming real life celebrities in popularity.</li>
<li>Chinese Internet users are the most likely in Asia Pacific to post a negative online product review, and are the only consumers in the region more likely to share negative reviews than positive reviews – 62% of Chinese Internet users say they are more likely to share a negative review compared to 41 percent globally.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Facebook threatens Orkut’s share in India</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Although 70 percent of social media users in India identify Orkut as  their preferred social media site, Facebook is gaining market share with  50 percent of social media users claiming to use Facebook most often,  compared to 38 percent for Orkut, with the most common reasons for  switching include friends moving sites, preferring the look and feel of  the site, and offering more features.</li>
<li>Twitter has enjoyed exponential growth in popularity in India, with more than half of Twitter users (57%) having signed up in the past year. Close to one third of India’s social media users (32%) use microblogging sites such as Twitter at least once a day.</li>
<li>Online product reviews are increasing their influence on purchases in India, particularly for consumer electronics – 55 percent of Indians that read online product reviews have purchased products based on feedback. Consumer durables/electronics are the most common products purchased based on reviews (64% of purchases).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Koreans a-buzz about social media</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>By population, Korea is one of the most social media engaged countries in the world, with the country’s leading social media site, Naver, attracting 95 percent of the Korean Internet population every month.</li>
<li>While penetration of social media amongst Korea’s Internet population is already strong, it continues to grow (Twitter alone saw 1900% growth in the year to May 2009) with much of this growth coming off the back of Korea’s June election and the adoption of mobile social networking.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Australians flock to online forums</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Australia leads the world in social media engagement, with the highest global average for time spent per month engaging with social media, averaging over seven hours per month</li>
<li>In contrast to many countries, Australians look to communities of interest such as parenting or sports sites as a key channel for social media discussion – 62 percent of Australian Internet users visited a message board or forum in 2009.</li>
<li>LinkedIn has seen one of the fastest growth trends amongst social media sites in Australia, with unique audience numbers increasing by 99 percent from July 2009 to May 2010</li>
</ul>
<p>“The findings highlight, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that social media is here to stay and needs to be taken seriously by the broader business community, from the CMO to the CEO,” notes Megan Clarken, Managing Director of Nielsen’s online business in Asia Pacific. “With three quarters of the global Internet population now participating in some form of social media, businesses can no longer afford to simply observe the social media phenomenon, they need to embrace it.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-dominates-asia-pacific-internet-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networks/Blogs Now Account for One in Every Four and a Half Minutes Online</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet time on site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The popularity of social media is undeniable as the world now spends over 110 billion minutes on social networks and blog sites – 22 percent of their time online. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The popularity of social media is undeniable &#8211; three of the world’s most popular brands online are social-media related (Facebook, YouTube and Wikipedia) and the world now spends over 110 billion minutes on social networks and blog sites. This equates to 22 percent of all time online or one in every four and half minutes. For the first time ever, social network or blog sites are visited by three quarters of global consumers who go online, after the numbers of people visiting these sites increased by 24% over last year. The average visitor spends 66% more time on these sites than a year ago, almost 6 hours in April 2010 versus 3 hours, 31 minutes last year.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" width="476" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>WORLD’S* MOST POPULAR BRANDS ONLINE / April 2010</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="bottom">Brand</td>
<td width="117" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">% of World’s   Internet Population visiting brand</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Time per person   (hh:mm:ss)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">Google</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">82%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">1:21:51</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">62%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">2:41:49</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">Facebook</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">54%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">6:00:00</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">Yahoo!</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">53%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">1:50:16</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">Microsoft</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">48%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">0:45:31</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">YouTube</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">47%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">0:57:33</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">Wikipedia</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">35%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">0:13:26</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">AOL   Media Network</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">27%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">2:01:02</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">eBay</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">26%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">1:34:08</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="180" valign="top">Apple</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">26%</p>
</td>
<td width="117" valign="top">
<p align="center">1:00:28</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table-meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen   Company</p>
<p><em>*Global  refers to AU, BR, CH, DE, ES, FR, IT, UK &amp; USA only</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Brazil not only tops the list of teams favored to win this year’s World Cup, they also top the charts with the highest percentage (86%) of Internet consumers visiting a social network. The popularity of social networking in Brazil is due to the Orkut phenomenon, which first appeared there in 2004 &#8211; by September 2005, half of the Brazilian Internet population visited Orkut. Australian web users average the most time on social networking sites, averaging 7 hours 19 minutes in April, followed by the U.S. and Italy with around six and a half hours each.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="423" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>Reach and Usage by   Country / Apr 2010 (Home &amp; Work)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="423" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>Social Networking / Blog  Sites</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Country</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">% Reach of Active   Users</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Time per Person   (hh:mm:ss)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Brazil</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">86%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">5:03:37</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Italy</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">78%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6:28:41</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Spain</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">77%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">5:11:44</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Japan</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">75%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">2:50:50</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">United   States</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">74%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6:35:02</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">United   Kingdom</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">74%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">5:52:38</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">France</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">73%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4:10:27</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Australia</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">72%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7:19:13</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Germany</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">63%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4:13:05</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Switzerland</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">59%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">3:43:58</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="423" valign="bottom">
<p align="right">Source: The Nielsen   Company</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Facebook’s reach is the widest in Italy, capturing two-thirds of the active unique audience in April 2010, making the site relatively more popular in Italy than in the three major English-speaking markets. Australia, the U.S. and the UK follow Italy with over 60% of active online consumers visiting the site. In contrast, Japanese people have the least appetite for Facebook, with reach and time spent markedly lower than in any of the other countries measured. Ameba, which offers a micro-blogging platform akin to Twitter, is the most popular social networking and blogging site in Japan, visited by 38% of Japanese people online while Facebook is the 40th most popular.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="423" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>Facebook Reach and Usage by   Country / Apr 2010 (Home &amp; Work)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="423" valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Country</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">% Reach of Active   Users</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Time per Person   (hh:mm:ss)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Italy</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">66%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7:00:21</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Australia</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">63%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7:45:28</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">United   States</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">62%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6:43:22</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">United   Kingdom</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">62%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6:19:59</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Spain</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">57%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4:04:53</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">France</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">57%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4:33:05</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Switzerland</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4:18:47</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Germany</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">27%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">3:42:50</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Brazil</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">26%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1:46:50</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Japan</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">3%</p>
</td>
<td width="148" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">0:31:38</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="423" valign="bottom">
<p align="right">Source: The Nielsen   Company</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook and Twitter Post Large Year over Year Gains in Unique Users</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/facebook-and-twitter-post-large-year-over-year-gains-in-unique-users/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/facebook-and-twitter-post-large-year-over-year-gains-in-unique-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global web usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Compared to user activity on social networking sites last year, Facebook and Twitter posted gains of 69% and 45% respectively in the U.S. Globally, the total minutes spend on social networks monthly saw a more than 100% gain over the same time last year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared to user activity on social networking sites last year, Facebook and Twitter posted gains of 69% and 45% respectively in the U.S.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/us-social-march2010.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21735" title="us-social-march2010" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/us-social-march2010.png" alt="us-social-march2010" width="515" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Globally, the total minutes spent on social networks monthly saw a more than 100% gain over the same time last year, driving the average time per person spent on social networks to over six hours per month.<br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Global Traffic To Social Networking Sites	(Home &amp; Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metric</th>
<th> Mar-08</th>
<th> Mar-09</th>
<th> Mar-10</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Unique Audience (000)</td>
<td>214,218</td>
<td>261,740</td>
<td>313,690</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Total Minutes (000)</td>
<td>28,577,539</td>
<td>55,703,031</td>
<td>113,061,590</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</td>
<td>2:13:24</td>
<td>3:32:49</td>
<td>6:00:25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p><em><strong>NOTE:</strong> Effective with June 2009 data reporting, Nielsen has made several enhancements to the U.S. NetView service.  For some sites, trending of previously-reported data with current results may show percentage differences attributable to this methodology change and should only be compared directionally.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/facebook-and-twitter-post-large-year-over-year-gains-in-unique-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

