<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; snacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/snacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>9 in 10 Will Watch Super Bowl at Home; Most will Spend the Same or Less on Food and Bev</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/9-in10-will-watch-super-bowl-at-home-most-will-spend-the-same-or-less-on-food-and-bev/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/9-in10-will-watch-super-bowl-at-home-most-will-spend-the-same-or-less-on-food-and-bev/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bev-al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food and beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A majority of households will be watching Super Bowl XLIV at home or at a friend or relative’s house instead of watching from a restaurant or bar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great majority of U.S. households (9 out of 10) say they will be watching Super Bowl XLIV at home or at a friend’s or relative’s house instead of watching it from a restaurant or bar, according to a new survey by The Nielsen Company. And for their home viewing, only five percent of households expect to spend more on food and beverages for the Super Bowl this year.</p>
<p>“Staying in is the new ‘night out’ and we see this trend continue to play out with the Super Bowl,” said Nick Lake, vice president, group client director, Beverage Alcohol at Nielsen. “Consumers continue to rein in spending and while this &#8216;new normal’ provides challenges for restaurant and bar owners, it presents opportunities for consumer packaged goods (CPG) retailers and manufacturers.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/superbowl-plan.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19728" title="superbowl-plan" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/superbowl-plan.png" alt="superbowl-plan" width="568" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>Nielsen’s survey of more than 28,000 U.S. households also shows that 86 percent of Super Bowl viewers plan to spend the same amount or less on food and beverages for the Super Bowl this year, while only five percent plan to spend more.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/superbowl-spend.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19730" title="superbowl-spend" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/superbowl-spend.png" alt="superbowl-spend" width="568" height="242" /></a><br />
<strong>Beer and The Big Game</strong><br />
While beer and football are popular American pastimes, the Super Bowl, somewhat surprisingly, is not the most popular beer holiday. Nielsen’s research shows that the Super Bowl ranks relatively low among holiday beer sales, after the Fourth of July, Memorial Day, Labor Day and Halloween.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Beer Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Event</th>
<th>2 Week Case Sales (millions of units)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4th of July</td>
<td>63.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Memorial Day</td>
<td>61.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Labor Day</td>
<td>60.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Thanksgiving</td>
<td>52.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Christmas</td>
<td>52.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Halloween</td>
<td>50.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Super Bowl</td>
<td>49.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>“We see the lowest amount of beer sales during the first quarter of the year leading up to a peak in the summer,” said Lake. “However, the Super Bowl continues to be a bigger and bigger event where consumers drink billions of servings of beer servings at home. Beer marketers are taking advantage of that opportunity to drive sales during what is typically a slower period for beer purchases.”</p>
<p><strong>Grocery the Big Winner</strong><br />
Nielsen’s analysis shows that with the exception of late March, grocery retailers experienced the biggest weeks for Q1 beer sales during the two weeks surrounding Super Bowl 2009, with nearly 17 million cases sold.</p>
<p>“At-home viewing of the Super Bowl is predominantly more of an opportunity for grocery stores, rather than other CPG retailers,” said Lake.  “Today’s consumers want value but also want convenience.  While picking up snacks and soda, they’re adding beer to their grocery baskets.  In the week leading up to the Super Bowl, look for heavy promotions at grocery stores, encouraging consumers to take advantage of the one-stop-shop for their Super Bowl party needs.”</p>
<p><strong>No Kickoff Without Snacks</strong><br />
Super Bowl viewers across the country stock their at-home parties with snacks, nearly 166 million pounds of snacks, especially salty snacks.  Potato chips reign, with more than 44 million pounds of snacks sold while tortilla chips and pretzels also rank high for Super Bowl sales.  The Super Bowl snack with the greatest growth?  Popped popcorn!</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<th>Dollar Sales (in millions)</th>
<th>Equivalized Unit Volume<br />
(millions, 16 ounce basis)</th>
<th>EQ % Change YOY</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">TOTAL SNACKS</td>
<td>$644.70</td>
<td>165.9</td>
<td>-3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">SNACKS &#8211; POTATO CHIPS</td>
<td>$173.80</td>
<td>44.3</td>
<td>1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">SNACKS &#8211; TORTILLA CHIPS</td>
<td>$135.90</td>
<td>39.1</td>
<td>-2.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">POPCORN &#8211; UNPOPPED</td>
<td>$39.30</td>
<td>15.8</td>
<td>-12.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">SNACKS &#8211; PRETZEL</td>
<td>$38.70</td>
<td>13.1</td>
<td>3.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">SNACKS &#8211; PUFFED CHEESE</td>
<td>$36.80</td>
<td>8.9</td>
<td>2.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">SNACKS &#8211; CORN CHIPS</td>
<td>$22.40</td>
<td>6.1</td>
<td>-8.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">POPCORN &#8211; POPPED</td>
<td>$8.50</td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>32.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">TOTAL CRACKERS</td>
<td>$185.00</td>
<td>56.4</td>
<td>-4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">TOTAL NUTS</td>
<td>$108.50</td>
<td>23.8</td>
<td>-12.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Private Label Snacks Gaining Ground</strong><br />
Consumers in the ‘”new normal” are trying private label or store brand items more than ever before and this trend holds true for snack items with private label snacks gaining ground.  For example, during the two weeks surrounding the Super Bowl in 2007, private label snacks held a dollar share of 6.8 and an equivalized share of 10.4.  During the two weeks surrounding the Super Bowl in 2009, this jumped to a dollar share of 8.1 and an equivalized share of 12.5.   Similar trends are evident for private label crackers, nuts and frozen pizza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/9-in10-will-watch-super-bowl-at-home-most-will-spend-the-same-or-less-on-food-and-bev/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NeuroFocus’s Work For Frito-Lay Featured In New York Times</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/neurofocus%e2%80%99s-work-for-frito-lay-featured-in-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/neurofocus%e2%80%99s-work-for-frito-lay-featured-in-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frito-Lay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NeuroFocus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Frito-Lay wanted to increase the appeal of its calorie-conscious snacks to women &#8211; who are snacking more than men &#8211; it turned to NeuroFocus, a research company that brings neuroscience to the world of advertising, messaging, packaging and product development.  By measuring brainwaves, eye-tracking and skin conductance, researchers can, for example, determine whether a message resonates with a consumer.
In Frito-Lay&#8217;s case, NeuroFocus was enlisted by the ad agency charged with re-defining calorie-conscious snacks such as Baked Lays and 100-calorie packages to make them appeal to women.  To learn more ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/woman-chips.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8632" title="woman-chips" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/woman-chips-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>When Frito-Lay wanted to increase the appeal of its calorie-conscious snacks to women &#8211; who are snacking more than men &#8211; it turned to NeuroFocus, a research company that brings neuroscience to the world of advertising, messaging, packaging and product development.  By measuring brainwaves, eye-tracking and skin conductance, researchers can, for example, determine whether a message resonates with a consumer.</p>
<p>In Frito-Lay&#8217;s case, NeuroFocus was enlisted by the ad agency charged with re-defining calorie-conscious snacks such as Baked Lays and 100-calorie packages to make them appeal to women.  To learn more about NeuroFocus&#8217;s work on this campaign, read the New York Times article <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/business/media/25adco.html">here.</a></p>
<p>Nielsen made a strategic investment in NeuroFocus in February 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/neurofocus%e2%80%99s-work-for-frito-lay-featured-in-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100 Calorie Snack Packs Show Mixed Performance</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/100-calorie-snack-packs-show-mixed-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/100-calorie-snack-packs-show-mixed-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dieting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Lempert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve all gone to the grocery store and seen them: the boxes of cookies, crackers and other snacks that offer small packs of our favorite treats that limit calorie intake to 100 calories. Given the amount of shelf space these products take up, it would be a fair assumption that these items generate a fair amount of sales.  But the fact is that these products comprise a fairly small share of the huge, multi-billion dollar snack category. And with a high cost-per-ounce, the price premium for these products may be ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chips.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7730" title="Pile of potato chips" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chips-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="108" height="108" /></a>We&#8217;ve all gone to the grocery store and seen them: the boxes of cookies, crackers and other snacks that offer small packs of our favorite treats that limit calorie intake to 100 calories. Given the amount of shelf space these products take up, it would be a fair assumption that these items generate a fair amount of sales.  But the fact is that these products comprise a fairly small share of the huge, multi-billion dollar snack category. And with a high cost-per-ounce, the price premium for these products may be less appealing in tight times.</p>
<p>Limited-portion snacks accounted for only $74 million of the $11.3 billion snacks business.  According to Nielsen, food, drug and mass merchandiser stores (excluding Walmart) over the past five years mostly show that this category&#8217;s share accounts for 2 percent or less of sales. </p>
<p>Despite being a relatively miniscule part of overall snack sales, some types of limited-portion packs showed growth in 2008.  Potato chips and tortilla chips grew by 62.1 percent and 10.2 percent, respectively.  That impressive growth, however, generated sales of only $17.2 million and $12.2 million.</p>
<p>Sales of limited portion cookies and crackers lost steam in 2008, down 6.8 percent and 25.6 percent, respectively, even though both categories showed modest overall growth.</p>
<p>This information was published in the January issue of Facts, Figures &amp; the Future, a monthly e-publication focused on delivering the latest consumer data and trend information to members of the Food Marketing Institute and clients of Nielsen. Facts, Figures &amp; the Future is published by The Lempert Report/Consumer Insight, Inc. and is sponsored by the Food Marketing Institute and Nielsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/100-calorie-snack-packs-show-mixed-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tops In 2008: Most Popular Consumer Goods</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-most-popular-consumer-goods/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-most-popular-consumer-goods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baked goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbonated beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloaded songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3 markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products placements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarborough Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tops In 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen has issued a year-end look at the most popular trends among Americans during 2008, covering everything from the top TV programs to the most popular consumer packaged goods.
It&#8217;s official: Americans love their carbs.  The Bread and Baked Goods category ranked number one for 2008 &#8212; both in terms of consumer purchases and retail sales.  According to Nielsen, 99% of U.S. homes purchased bread/baked goods at least once during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.  The Bread/Baked Goods category raked in $18.3 billion in sales through November 1.  Other ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Nielsen has issued a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nielsen-top-tens-2008-final13.pdf">year-end look</a> at the most popular trends among Americans during 2008, covering everything from the top TV programs to the most popular consumer packaged goods.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/consumer_shopping1.jpg"></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/bread_sliced.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5860" title="bread_sliced" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/bread_sliced-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>It&#8217;s official: Americans love their carbs.  The Bread and Baked Goods category ranked number one for 2008 &#8212; both in terms of consumer purchases and retail sales.  According to Nielsen, 99% of U.S. homes purchased bread/baked goods at least once during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.  The Bread/Baked Goods category raked in $18.3 billion in sales through November 1.  Other popular CPG categories include paper products, snacks, and carbonated beverages.</p>
<p>Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron, also reported on the top U.S.  markets for online shopping.  Washington, D.C. and San Francisco ranked first and second, respectively, with 39% and 35% of adults spending $500 or more online in the past year.  Nationwide, 25% of adults reported spending $500 or more online in the past year.<br />
<span id="more-5845"></span></p>
<p><strong>Top 10 Consumer Packaged Goods Purchased by U.S. Homes</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Category</th>
<th>% U.S. Homes<br />
Who Purchased<br />
Each Category<br />
Within Past Year</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Bread and Baked Goods</td>
<td>99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Paper Products</td>
<td>99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Snacks</td>
<td>98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Condiments, Gravies, and Sauces</td>
<td>98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Candy</td>
<td>97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Milk, Cream, Eggnog, Shakes &amp; Drinks</td>
<td>97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Cheese</td>
<td>97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fresh Produce</td>
<td>96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Packaged Meat-Refrigerated</td>
<td>96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Carbonated Beverages</td>
<td>96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Note: Data reflects the percentage of U.S. households who purchased at least once during 52-weeks ending June 28, 2008. Data includes manufacturer prepackaged, UPC items only.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 Consumer Packaged Goods Sold in U.S. Retail Stores</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Category</th>
<th>Dollars Sold<br />
(in Billions)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Bread and Baked Goods</td>
<td>$18.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Carbonated Beverages</td>
<td>$18.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Fresh Produce</td>
<td>$16.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Milk, Cream, Eggnog, Shakes &amp; Drinks</td>
<td>$16.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Paper Products</td>
<td>$14.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Snacks</td>
<td>$14.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Packaged Meat-Refrigerated</td>
<td>$13.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Cheese</td>
<td>$13.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Prepared Foods-Frozen</td>
<td>$11.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Pet Food</td>
<td>$10.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (52-weeks ending November 1, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Note: Data includes manufacturer prepackaged, UPC items only. Data includes sales from food, drug, mass merchandiser stores, including Wal-Mart.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top U.S. Markets For Adults Who Spent More Than $500+ Online Last Year</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>% Adults Who Spent $500+ Online<br />
In The Past Year</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Washington, D.C. DMA</td>
<td>39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose DMA</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Seattle/Tacoma DMA</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Honolulu DMA</td>
<td>33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Phoenix DMA</td>
<td>32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston DMA</td>
<td>32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>San Diego DMA</td>
<td>32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Austin DMA</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Baltimore DMA</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Denver DMA</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"> </td>
<td><strong>National Average </strong></td>
<td><strong>25%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, Scarborough USA+ Release 1 2008.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nielsen-top-tens-2008-final12.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Relive the greatest hits of 2008 &#8212; stay tuned on Nielsen Wire for more </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/tops-in-2008/" target="_blank"><strong>Tops In 2008</strong></a><strong> coverage.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Look ahead to the new year with Nielsen Wire&#8217;s </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/2009-outlook/" target="_blank"><strong>2009 Industry Outlook</strong></a><strong> series.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-most-popular-consumer-goods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Wine, Diet Aids, Gardening Product Categories Skew To High-Income U.S. Households</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dairy dips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet aids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh produce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[households earning $100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refrigerated drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skin care preparations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. households earning $100,000 or more in annual income, spent more than twice as much on wine than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.
Although they represent only 18.7% of U.S. households, high-income households represented 39.6% of wine dollar sales during the time period. 
Other categories skewing to households with high incomes include diet aids, liquor, and floral/gardening supplies.



Rank
(by highest index)
Top 10 Category Purchases:
U.S. Households
With $100,000+ Annual Income
Dollar Volume Index*


1
Wine
212


2
Diet Aids
158


3
Liquor
156


4
Floral / Gardening
155


5
Baby Needs
152


6
Snacks / Spreads / Dairy Dips
148


7
Baby Food
147


8
Skin Care Preparations
147


9
Fresh Produce
144


10
Juices / Refrigerated Drinks
142


*Note: &#8220;Dollar Volume ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/diversity.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2874" title="diversity" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/diversity-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>U.S. households earning $100,000 or more in annual income, spent more than twice as much on wine than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.</p>
<p>Although they represent only 18.7% of U.S. households, high-income households represented 39.6% of wine dollar sales during the time period. </p>
<p>Other categories skewing to households with high incomes include diet aids, liquor, and floral/gardening supplies.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Category Purchases:<br />
U.S. Households<br />
With $100,000+ Annual Income</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index*</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Wine</td>
<td>212</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Diet Aids</td>
<td>158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Liquor</td>
<td>156</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Floral / Gardening</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Baby Needs</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Snacks / Spreads / Dairy Dips</td>
<td>148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Baby Food</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Skin Care Preparations</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Fresh Produce</td>
<td>144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Juices / Refrigerated Drinks</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Volume Index&#8221; is a demographic segment&#8217;s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment&#8217;s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-2867"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting high-income households may want to promote these categories with feature ads, displays, and product assortments.  Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://www2.acnielsen.com/products/cps_homescan.shtml" target="_blank">Homescan consumer panel</a>, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population.  Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

