<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Salt Lake City</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/salt-lake-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Election 2008: Where Are The Independent Voters?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat-leaning Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican-leaning Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New England &#8212; according to a recent analysis from Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron.
The study, which asked respondents in 81 U.S. cities to select the political party label that best describes how they see themselves &#8211; regardless of how they may have voted in the past, found that Boston, Providence, R.I., and Hartford, Conn. have the highest percentages of adults who consider themselves to be &#8220;Independents.&#8221; 
In contrast, Pittsburgh, Lexington, K.Y., and Oklahoma City, O.K. have the smallest percentages of self-identified Independents. 

Nationally, 27% of adults consider themselves ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button16.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1683" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button16-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In New England &#8212; according to a recent analysis from Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron.</p>
<p>The study, which asked respondents in 81 U.S. cities to select the political party label that best describes how they see themselves &#8211; regardless of how they may have voted in the past, found that Boston, Providence, R.I., and Hartford, Conn. have the highest percentages of adults who consider themselves to be &#8220;Independents.&#8221; </p>
<p>In contrast, Pittsburgh, Lexington, K.Y., and Oklahoma City, O.K. have the smallest percentages of self-identified Independents. </p>
<p><span id="more-1680"></span></p>
<p>Nationally, 27% of adults consider themselves to be politically Independent.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed Independents*</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Providence/New Bedford, RI</td>
<td>47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Hartford/New Haven, CT</td>
<td>41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Des Moines/Ames, IA</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Green Bay/Appleton, WI</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Spokane, WA</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Seattle/Tacoma, WA</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Grand Rapids/Kalamazoo/Battle Creek, MI</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: Self-Proclaimed Independents include those leaning Democrat and Republican.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Scarborough&#8217;s survey also examined “Leaning Independents” &#8212; those adults who described themselves in Scarborough&#8217;s study as “Independent, but feel closer to Democrat,” or “Independent, but feel closer to Republican.”</p>
<p>Seattle and Providence, R.I. had the highest percentages of Democrat-leaning Independents (17%), while Salt Lake City and Spokane, W.A. had the highest percentages of Republican-leaning Independents (15%).</p>
<p>Nationally, 9% of adults identified themselves as Democrat-leaning Independents, while 8% of adults characterized themselves as Republican-leaning Independents.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed<br />
Democrat-Leaning Independents</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed<br />
Democrat-Leaning Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Seattle, WA</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Providence, RI</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Des Moines, IA</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flint, MI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Austin, TX</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Honolulu, HI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed<br />
Republican-Leaning Independents</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed<br />
Republican-Leaning Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Salt Lake City, UT</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Spokane, WA</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Grand Rapids, MI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Birmingham, AL</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Indianapolis, IN</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Milwaukee, WI</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Flint, MI</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Houston, TX</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://www.scarborough.com/press_releases/Politics%20FINAL%206.17.08.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2002 Salt Lake City Olympics: Daily Unique Web Audience</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/2002-salt-lake-city-olympics-unique-web-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/2002-salt-lake-city-olympics-unique-web-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBCOlympics.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saltlake2002.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Date
Saltlake2002.com
(Olympics.com redirects
to Saltlake2002.com)
NBCOlympics.com


Fri, 2/8/02
143,000
267,000


Sat, 2/9/02
226,000
398,000


Sun, 2/10/02
311,000
241,000


Mon, 2/11/02
167,000
342,000


Tue, 2/12/02
280,000
438,000


Wed, 2/13/02
229,000
376,000


Thu, 2/14/02
173,000
254,000


Fri, 2/15/02
135,000
235,000


Sat, 2/16/02
135,000
354,000


Sun, 2/17/02
213,000
347,000


Mon, 2/18/02
175,000
298,000


Tue, 2/19/02
150,000
324,000


Wed, 2/20/02
168,000
291,000


Thu, 2/21/02
262,000
545,000


Fri, 2/22/02
235,000
314,000


Sat, 2/23/02
203,000
360,000


Sun, 2/24/02
333,000
317,000


Mon, 2/25/02
142,000
113,000*


Source: The Nielsen Company (February 8, 2002 &#8211; February 25, 2002)


Data includes U.S. home Web traffic only.


*Indicates website does not meet minimum sample size standards, and therefore projected and average measures for this site may exhibit large changes month-to-month as a result.



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Saltlake2002.com<br />
(Olympics.com redirects<br />
to Saltlake2002.com)</th>
<th>NBCOlympics.com</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Fri, 2/8/02</td>
<td>143,000</td>
<td>267,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sat, 2/9/02</td>
<td>226,000</td>
<td>398,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sun, 2/10/02</td>
<td>311,000</td>
<td>241,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Mon, 2/11/02</td>
<td>167,000</td>
<td>342,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tue, 2/12/02</td>
<td>280,000</td>
<td>438,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Wed, 2/13/02</td>
<td>229,000</td>
<td>376,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Thu, 2/14/02</td>
<td>173,000</td>
<td>254,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Fri, 2/15/02</td>
<td>135,000</td>
<td>235,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sat, 2/16/02</td>
<td>135,000</td>
<td>354,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sun, 2/17/02</td>
<td>213,000</td>
<td>347,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Mon, 2/18/02</td>
<td>175,000</td>
<td>298,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tue, 2/19/02</td>
<td>150,000</td>
<td>324,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Wed, 2/20/02</td>
<td>168,000</td>
<td>291,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Thu, 2/21/02</td>
<td>262,000</td>
<td>545,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Fri, 2/22/02</td>
<td>235,000</td>
<td>314,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sat, 2/23/02</td>
<td>203,000</td>
<td>360,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sun, 2/24/02</td>
<td>333,000</td>
<td>317,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Mon, 2/25/02</td>
<td>142,000</td>
<td>113,000*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (February 8, 2002 &#8211; February 25, 2002)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Data includes U.S. home Web traffic only.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Indicates website does not meet minimum sample size standards, and therefore projected and average measures for this site may exhibit large changes month-to-month as a result.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/2002-salt-lake-city-olympics-unique-web-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
