<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>November 2011 &#8211; Top U.S. Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During November 2011, Google was the most-visited Web brand with 174.3 million unique U.S. visitors. The list of Top Brands remained the same as the month before, with the Amazon overtaking Wikipedia as the 8th ranked site by total audience in November, reflecting greater consumer activity during the busy holiday shopping season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During November 2011, Google was the most-visited Web brand with 174.3 million unique U.S. visitors. The list of Top Brands remained the same as the month before, with the Amazon overtaking Wikipedia as the 8th ranked site by total audience in November, reflecting greater consumer activity during the busy holiday shopping season.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Web Brands for November 2011 (U.S., Total)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Total Internet Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>174,314</td>
<td>1:44:51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>156,247</td>
<td>6:59:20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>145,406</td>
<td>2:06:30*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>130,896</td>
<td>1:32:49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>127,004</td>
<td>1:36:37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>98,121</td>
<td>0:44:31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>87,005</td>
<td>2:56:06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>84,233</td>
<td>0:42:14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>79,688</td>
<td>0:18:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>74,793</td>
<td>1:07:03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Read as: During November 2011, 174.3 million unique U.S. people visited Google’s websites.</p>
<p>Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>* - Yahoo! duration data shows an artificial decrease for May – November 2011 and does not reflect the activity on these sites.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>Overall 213 million Americans were active online in November 2011, and Nielsen estimated that over 274 million Americans were connected to the Internet.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Average U.S. Internet Usage for November 2011</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metrics</th>
<th>Total</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="200">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>2911</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:01:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Online Time per Person</td>
<td>29:02:30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People Who Went Online</td>
<td>213,285,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People who had Internet access</td>
<td>274,404,664</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Read as: 213 million Americans were active online during November 2011.</p>
<p>Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen&#8217;s Tops of 2011: Digital</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-tops-of-2011-digital/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-tops-of-2011-digital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen looks at the top online destinations and mobile platforms of 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As 2011 comes to a close, Nielsen reviewed the top online destinations, social media sites, and smartphone devices. Google was the most-visited U.S. Web brand, while Facebook held its lead among social networks and blogs.  Smartphones were popular in 2011, making up the majority of new phone purchases with Apple as the top smartphone manufacturer and Android as the leading OS.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 U.S. Web Brands in 2011</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Web Brand</th>
<th>Avg # of Unique Visitors (000)<br />
per month</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>153,441</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>137,644</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>130,121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>115,890</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>106,692</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>83,691</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>74,633</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>62,097</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>61,608</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Ask Search Network</td>
<td>60,552</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January &#8211; October 2011, Home and Work Computers. Ranked on average monthly unique audience.</p>
<p>Read as: During 2011, 153.4 million U.S. people, on average, visited Google sites from home and work computers</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> Top 10 U.S. Social Networks &amp; Blogs</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Web Brand</th>
<th>Avg # of Unique Visitors (000)<br />
per month</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>137,644</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Blogger</td>
<td>45,712</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Twitter.com</td>
<td>23,574</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>WordPress.com</td>
<td>20,357</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Myspace.com</td>
<td>17,935</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>LinkedIn</td>
<td>17,020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Tumblr</td>
<td>10,879</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Google+</td>
<td>8,207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Yahoo! Pulse</td>
<td>8,063</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Six Apart TypePad</td>
<td>7,793</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January &#8211; October 2011, Home and Work Computers. Ranked on average monthly unique audience.</p>
<p>Read as: During 2011, 137.6 million U.S. people, on average, visited Facebook from home and work computers</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>For more insights and stats about how consumers use social media, please see Nielsen&#8217;s Q3 2011 <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/">Social Media Report</a></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 U.S. Online Destinations for Video</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Web Brand</th>
<th> Avg # of Unique Video Viewers<br />
per month</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>111,152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>VEVO</td>
<td>34,580</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>29,802</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>25,324</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>16,563</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>13,327</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Hulu</td>
<td>13,159</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>The CollegeHumor Network</td>
<td>12,496</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>CNN Digital Network</td>
<td>8,262</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Netflix</td>
<td>7,418</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January &#8211; October 2011, Home and Work Computers. Ranked on average monthly unique viewers.</p>
<p>Read as: During 2011, 111.2 million U.S. people, on average, watched video content on YouTube from home and work computers</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 5 Smartphone Device Manufacturers</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Manufacturer</th>
<th> Market Share</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>HTC</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td><span style="font-size: 10px; line-height: normal;">RIM BlackBerry</span></td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Samsung</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Motorola</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from August &#8211; October 2011.</p>
<p>Read as: 29 percent of mobile phone users who recently purchased a new smartphone bought an Apple device</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>For more smartphone market data and insights about how consumer use their mobile devices, please see Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-the-rise-of-smartphones-apps-and-the-mobile-web/">Mobile Media Report</a> for 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-tops-of-2011-digital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen&#8217;s Tops of 2011: Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-entertainment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-entertainment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Bookscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen looks at the top DVD and book titles of 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Film adaptations of books dominated entertainment sales in 2011 to great success, according to Nielsen. The Harry Potter series held the top spot for DVD sales, while The Help, The Hunger Games, Water for Elephants and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo were among the top books of the year.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 DVD Titles</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Title</th>
<th> Distributor</th>
<th> Release Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I</td>
<td>Warner Home Video</td>
<td>4/15/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Tangled</td>
<td>Disney/Buena Vista Home Video</td>
<td>3/29/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II</td>
<td>Warner Home Video</td>
<td>11/11/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Transformers: Dark of the Moon</td>
<td>Paramount Home Entertainment</td>
<td>9/30/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Cars 2</td>
<td>Disney/Buena Vista Home Video</td>
<td>11/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Rio</td>
<td>20th Century Fox Home Ent</td>
<td>8/2/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Bridesmaids</td>
<td>Universal Home Entertainment</td>
<td>9/20/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Megamind</td>
<td>Paramount Home Entertainment</td>
<td>2/25/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Fast Five</td>
<td>Universal Home Entertainment</td>
<td>10/4/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Lion King</td>
<td>Disney/Buena Vista Home Video</td>
<td>10/4/2011</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">
<p>Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January 3, 2011 &#8211; December 4, 2011. Based on Aggregate disc unit sales (DVD, Blu-ray, Blu-ray/DVD Combo packs, etc.). Does not include data from Wal-Mart.  Most other sell-through retailers are included.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Print Book Sales &#8211; Adult Non-Fiction</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Title</th>
<th> Format</th>
<th> Author</th>
<th> Imprint</th>
<th> Publish Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Heaven Is For Real</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Todd Burpo</td>
<td>Thomas Nelson Publishers</td>
<td>11/1/2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Steve Jobs</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Walter Isaacson</td>
<td>Simon &amp; Schuster</td>
<td>10/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Unbroken</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Laura Hillenbrand</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>11/1/2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Killing Lincoln</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Bill O&#8217;Reilly</td>
<td>Henry Holt &amp; Company</td>
<td>9/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Strengths Finder 2.0</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Tom Rath</td>
<td>Gallup Press</td>
<td>2/1/2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>A Stolen Life</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Jaycee Dugard</td>
<td>Simon &amp; Schuster</td>
<td>7/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Bossypants</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Tina Fey</td>
<td>Reagan Arthur Books</td>
<td>4/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>The 17 Day Diet</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Mike Moreno</td>
<td>Free Press</td>
<td>3/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Rebecca Skloot</td>
<td>Broadway Books</td>
<td>3/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>In The Garden Of Beasts</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Erik Larson</td>
<td>Crown Publishing Group (Ny)</td>
<td>5/1/2011</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">
<p>Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January 3, 2011 &#8211; December 11, 2011. Nielsen BookScan&#8217;s U.S. Consumer Market Panel currently covers approximately 75% of retail sales and continues to grow. BookScan does not track sales from Wal-Mart/Sam&#8217;s Club.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Print Book Sales &#8211; Adult Fiction</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Title</th>
<th> Format</th>
<th> Author</th>
<th> Imprint</th>
<th> Publish Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>The Help</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Kathryn Stockett</td>
<td>Berkley Publishing Group</td>
<td>4/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>The Help</td>
<td>Trade Paperback (Movie Tie-In Edition)</td>
<td>Kathryn Stockett</td>
<td>Berkley Publishing Group</td>
<td>6/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Water For Elephants</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Sara Gruen</td>
<td>Algonquin Books Of Chapel Hill</td>
<td>5/1/2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Cutting For Stone</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Abraham Verghese</td>
<td>Vintage Books</td>
<td>1/1/2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>A Dance With Dragons</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>George R. R. Martin</td>
<td>Bantam Books</td>
<td>7/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>The Confession</td>
<td>Mass Market Paperback</td>
<td>John Grisham</td>
<td>Dell Publishing Company</td>
<td>7/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Stieg Larsson</td>
<td>Vintage Books</td>
<td>6/1/2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet&#8217;s Nest</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Stieg Larsson</td>
<td>Knopf Publishing Group</td>
<td>5/1/2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>The Litigators</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>John Grisham</td>
<td>Doubleday Books</td>
<td>10/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Room</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Emma Donoghue</td>
<td>Back Bay Books</td>
<td>5/1/2011</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">
<p>Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January 3, 2011 &#8211; December 11, 2011. Nielsen BookScan&#8217;s U.S. Consumer Market Panel currently covers approximately 75% of retail sales and continues to grow. BookScan does not track sales from Wal-Mart/Sam&#8217;s Club.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Print Book Sales &#8211; Children and Young Adults</caption>
<tbody>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Title</th>
<th> Format</th>
<th> Author</th>
<th> Imprint</th>
<th> Publish Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>The Hunger Games</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Suzanne Collins</td>
<td>Scholastic Press</td>
<td>7/1/2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Cabin Fever</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Jeff Kinney</td>
<td>Abrams</td>
<td>11/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Catching Fire</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Suzanne Collins</td>
<td>Scholastic Press</td>
<td>9/1/2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Inheritance</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Christopher Paolini</td>
<td>Alfred A. Knopf Books For Youn</td>
<td>11/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Mockingjay</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Suzanne Collins</td>
<td>Scholastic Press</td>
<td>8/1/2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>The Son Of Neptune</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Rick Riordan</td>
<td>Hyperion Books</td>
<td>10/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>The Throne Of Fire</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Rick Riordan</td>
<td>Hyperion Books</td>
<td>5/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>The Ugly Truth</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Jeff Kinney</td>
<td>Amulet Books</td>
<td>11/1/2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>The Wimpy Kid Do-It-Yourself Book</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Jeff Kinney</td>
<td>Amulet Books</td>
<td>5/1/2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Elf On The Shelf</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Carol V. Aebersold</td>
<td>Cca &amp; B</td>
<td>12/1/2006</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">
<p>Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January 3, 2011 &#8211; December 11, 2011. Nielsen BookScan&#8217;s U.S. Consumer Market Panel currently covers approximately 75% of retail sales and continues to grow. BookScan does not track sales from Wal-Mart/Sam&#8217;s Club.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-entertainment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen&#8217;s Tops of 2011: Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen looks at the most effective TV advertisements of 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Volkswagen’s adorable Darth Vader-inspired Super Bowl spot to Purell’s memorable placement on The Big Bang Theory, Nielsen names the top advertisements and integrations of the year. The lists demonstrate that reality and scripted shows continued to find innovative ways to integrate brands into their broadcast primetime programming. The best liked ads reflect the enduring value of traditional ad elements that have withstood the test of time &#8211; strong creative, simple and engaging messaging, and a solid emotional connection.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for Nielsen’s top 10s in TV, digital and entertainment.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Most-Liked New Ads</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Title</th>
<th> Ad Description (Seconds)</th>
<th> Likability Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>Super Bowl: Passat &#8212; A little boy dressed as Darth Vader believes he used &#8220;the force&#8221; to turn on a car (:30)</td>
<td>231</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Oreo</td>
<td>Boy wakes up father at midnight for a Father&#8217;s Day treat (:15)</td>
<td>201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>St. Jude&#8217;s</td>
<td>Shaun White sits with kids, who wear wigs matching his hairstyle (:30)</td>
<td>191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Hallmark</td>
<td>Recordable Storybook &#8212; Deployed soldier shares holidays with family when he flips through recorded storybook (:30)</td>
<td>190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Real California Milk</td>
<td>Cow tells mom to change her &#8220;mom jeans&#8221; and show off her &#8220;bundt cake&#8221; (:30)</td>
<td>189</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl: A man licks snack crumbs off his coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>188</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Target</td>
<td>Boy in gecko costume uses sticky gecko hands to take all of the candy when trick-or-treating (:15)</td>
<td>187</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>M&amp;M&#8217;s</td>
<td>Pretzel &#8212; Candy and pretzel combo prefer to be eaten by attractive woman than man they call &#8220;Hungry Eyes&#8221; (:30)</td>
<td>186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Marie Callender&#8217;s &amp; Reddi-Wip</td>
<td>Boy is happy to sit at the adult table but returns to eat with the kids when they are served pie and whipped cream. (:30)</td>
<td>185</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Pepsi</td>
<td>Pop stars like Michael Jackson, Ray Charles, Britney Spears, Kanye West, and Mariah Carey perform and drink soda. (:30)</td>
<td>184</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January 1, 2011 &#8211; November 30, 2011. Broadcast Prime. Only new ad executions considered. The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average.</p>
<p>Read as: With a Likeability Index of 231 the top ranked Volkswagen ad has proven to be 131 percent better-liked than the average new commercial during the measured period.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Most Remembered Branded Integrations &#8211; Dramas/Sitcoms</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Branded Integration Description</th>
<th>Program (Network/Air Date)</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Purell</td>
<td>Sheldon uses hand sanitizer after he puts a live snake in a desk drawer.</td>
<td>The Big Bang Theory (CBS, Oct 27)</td>
<td>271</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Red Bull</td>
<td>Tessa describes the official drink of suburbia; people drink it repeatedly.</td>
<td>Suburgatory (ABC, Sep 28)</td>
<td>214</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Milton Bradley</td>
<td>Twister &#8212; Amy suggests that the group play the travel version of a game.</td>
<td>The Big Bang Theory (CBS, Nov 17)</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Ferrari</td>
<td>Beckett drives a car after Castle explains that it is a high performance vehicle.</td>
<td>Castle (ABC, Feb 7)</td>
<td>207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Subway</td>
<td>Big Mike says that his kidnapping hasn&#8217;t been that bad because his kidnappers brought sandwiches.</td>
<td>Chuck (NBC, Mar 21)</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Wizards of the Coast Games</td>
<td>Dungeons &amp; Dragons &#8212; Wolowitz comments on the way that Sheldon plays a board game.</td>
<td>The Big Bang Theory (CBS, Oct 6)</td>
<td>205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Rolex</td>
<td>Laura comments on the price of a watch she purchased before she realizes it may have been stolen.</td>
<td>Pan Am (ABC, Oct 30)</td>
<td>204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Snapple</td>
<td>Waldon drinks a beverage while talking to Alan about his breakup.</td>
<td>Two and a Half Men (CBS, Oct 17)</td>
<td>203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Hasbro</td>
<td>Scrabble &#8212; Dick tells Susan that he&#8217;d rather play Scrabble than talk to her.</td>
<td>Desperate Housewives (ABC, Jan 16)</td>
<td>200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Hasbro</td>
<td>Monopoly &#8212; Penny wants to play a board game after getting home from a trip with Tom.</td>
<td>Desperate Housewives (ABC, Oct 2)</td>
<td>199</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="5">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5">Data from January 1, 2011 &#8211; November 30, 2011. Broadcast Prime. The Recall Score is the percentage of television viewers who can recall within 24 hours the brand/product of a branded integration they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing Dramas/Sitcoms. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all integrations occurring in this genre during the time period (Recall Index). 100 equals average.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5">Note: For this analysis, branded integrations were only considered if the occurrence had visual elements (i.e., was &#8220;seen&#8221; on-screen) or both visual and auditory elements (i.e., was both &#8220;seen&#8221; and &#8220;mentioned&#8221;). Only first-run episodes were considered. Both planned and incidental exposures were included.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Primetime Programs with Product Placement Activity</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Program</th>
<th> Network</th>
<th> Total Number of Occurrences</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>American Idol</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>577</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>The Biggest Loser</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>533</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>The Celebrity Apprentice</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>391</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Dancing with the Stars</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>The X Factor</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>312</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Extreme Makeover: Home Edition</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>224</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>America&#8217;s Got Talent</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>220</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Friday Night Lights</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>America&#8217;s Next Top Model</td>
<td>CW</td>
<td>178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>The Amazing Race: Unfinished Business</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>161</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Data from January 1 &#8211; November 30, 2011. Primetime entertainment programming on five Broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, CW, FOX, and NBC).  First-run episodes only.  As a result of coding enhancements implemented in 2009, occurrence counts now reflect the total number of show segments in which a brand/product appears or is mentioned.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Cable TV Rankings: Sept. 29 &#8211; Oct. 5, 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-sept-29-oct-5-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-sept-29-oct-5-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anderson Cooper 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB division playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL regular season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TBSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The O'Reilly Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v.p. debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


RANK
NAME
NETWORK
DAYS
VIEWERS (P2+)


1
NFL REGULAR SEASON L (RAVENS/STEELERS)
ESPN
MONDAY
11,783,000


2
VP DEBATE(S)-10/02/2008
FOXNC
THURSDAY
11,098,000


3
SR/VICE PRES DEBATE 2008(S)-10/02/2008
CNN
THURSDAY
10,685,000


4
ON THE RECORD W/GRETA
FOXNC
THURSDAY
9,801,000


5
ANDERSON COOPER 360
CNN
THURSDAY
7,961,000


6
VP DEBATE CVG(S)-10/02/2008
FOXNC
THURSDAY
7,372,000


7
VP DEBATE ANALYSIS(S)-10/02/2008
FOXNC
THURSDAY
6,977,000


8
MLB DIVISION SERIES (ANGELS-RED SOX 3)
TBSC
SUNDAY
6,199,000


9
THE OREILLY FACTOR
FOXNC
THURSDAY
5,624,000


10
MLB DIVISION SERIES (DODGERS-CUBS 1)
TBSC
WEDNESDAY
5,381,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (September 29, 2008 &#8211; October 5, 2008).



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>NAME</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>DAYS</th>
<th>VIEWERS (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NFL REGULAR SEASON L (RAVENS/STEELERS)</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>MONDAY</td>
<td>11,783,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>VP DEBATE(S)-10/02/2008</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>11,098,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>SR/VICE PRES DEBATE 2008(S)-10/02/2008</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>10,685,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>ON THE RECORD W/GRETA</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>9,801,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>ANDERSON COOPER 360</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>7,961,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>VP DEBATE CVG(S)-10/02/2008</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>7,372,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>VP DEBATE ANALYSIS(S)-10/02/2008</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>6,977,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>MLB DIVISION SERIES (ANGELS-RED SOX 3)</td>
<td>TBSC</td>
<td>SUNDAY</td>
<td>6,199,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>THE OREILLY FACTOR</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>5,624,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>MLB DIVISION SERIES (DODGERS-CUBS 1)</td>
<td>TBSC</td>
<td>WEDNESDAY</td>
<td>5,381,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (September 29, 2008 &#8211; October 5, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-sept-29-oct-5-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Cable TV Rankings: September 22 &#8211; 28, 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-september-22-28-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-september-22-28-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv viewers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


RANK
NAME
NETWORK
DAYS
VIEWERS (P2+)


1
NFL REGULAR SEASON L (JETS/CHARGERS)
ESPN
MONDAY
11,881,000


2
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE(S)-09/26/2008
FOXNC
FRIDAY
8,211,000


3
ON THE RECORD W/GRETA
FOXNC
FRIDAY
7,413,000


4
SR/PRES DEBATE 1 2008(S)-09/26/2008
CNN
FRIDAY
7,140,000


5
COLL FTBALL-SAT PRIME L (ALABAMA/GEORGIA)
ESPN
SATURDAY
6,683,000


6
ANDERSON COOPER 360
CNN
FRIDAY
6,502,000


7
COLL FTBALL-THUR NIGHT L (USC/OREGON STATE)
ESPN
THURSDAY
6,456,000


8
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE CVG(S)-09/26/2008
FOXNC
FRIDAY
5,850,000


9
SUITE LIFE ON DECK
DSNY
FRIDAY
5,666,000


10
SUITE LIFE ON DECK
DSNY
SATURDAY
5,129,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (September 22, 2008 &#8211; September 28, 2008)



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>NAME</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>DAYS</th>
<th>VIEWERS (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NFL REGULAR SEASON L (JETS/CHARGERS)</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>MONDAY</td>
<td>11,881,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>FRIDAY</td>
<td>8,211,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>ON THE RECORD W/GRETA</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>FRIDAY</td>
<td>7,413,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>SR/PRES DEBATE 1 2008(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>FRIDAY</td>
<td>7,140,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>COLL FTBALL-SAT PRIME L (ALABAMA/GEORGIA)</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>SATURDAY</td>
<td>6,683,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>ANDERSON COOPER 360</td>
<td>CNN</td>
<td>FRIDAY</td>
<td>6,502,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>COLL FTBALL-THUR NIGHT L (USC/OREGON STATE)</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>THURSDAY</td>
<td>6,456,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE CVG(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>FOXNC</td>
<td>FRIDAY</td>
<td>5,850,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>SUITE LIFE ON DECK</td>
<td>DSNY</td>
<td>FRIDAY</td>
<td>5,666,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SUITE LIFE ON DECK</td>
<td>DSNY</td>
<td>SATURDAY</td>
<td>5,129,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (September 22, 2008 &#8211; September 28, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-september-22-28-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Cable TV Rankings: September 15 &#8211; 21, 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-september-15-21-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-september-15-21-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

	RANK	
	NAME	
	NETWORK	
	DAYS	
	VIEWERS (P2+)	


	1	
	NFL REGULAR SEASON &#8211; L (EAGLES/COWBOYS)	
	ESPN	
	MONDAY	
	18,608,000	


	2	
	CLOSER, THE	
	TNT	
	MONDAY	
	7,627,000	


	3	
	COLL FTBALL-SAT PRIME &#8211; L (LSU/AUBURN)	
	ESPN	
	SATURDAY	
	5,562,000	


	4	
	HANNITY &#038; COLMES	
	FOXNC	
	WEDNESDAY	
	4,921,000	


	5	
	NFL SPORTSCENTER &#8211; L	
	ESPN	
	MONDAY	
	4,759,000	


	6	
	BURN NOTICE	
	USA	
	THURSDAY	
	4,665,000	


	7	
	HANNITY &#038; COLMES	
	FOXNC	
	THURSDAY	
	4,589,000	


	8	
	ARMY WIVES	
	LIF	
	SUNDAY	
	4,374,000	


	9	
	RAISING THE BAR	
	TNT	
	MONDAY	
	4,210,000	


	10	
	WWE ENTERTAINMENT (WWE RAW)	
	USA	
	MONDAY	
	4,209,000	


								Source: The Nielsen Company (September 15, 2008 &#8211; September 21, 2008)		



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th>	RANK	</th>
<th>	NAME	</th>
<th>	NETWORK	</th>
<th>	DAYS	</th>
<th>	VIEWERS (P2+)	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	NFL REGULAR SEASON &#8211; L (EAGLES/COWBOYS)	</td>
<td>	ESPN	</td>
<td>	MONDAY	</td>
<td>	18,608,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	CLOSER, THE	</td>
<td>	TNT	</td>
<td>	MONDAY	</td>
<td>	7,627,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	COLL FTBALL-SAT PRIME &#8211; L (LSU/AUBURN)	</td>
<td>	ESPN	</td>
<td>	SATURDAY	</td>
<td>	5,562,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	HANNITY &#038; COLMES	</td>
<td>	FOXNC	</td>
<td>	WEDNESDAY	</td>
<td>	4,921,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	NFL SPORTSCENTER &#8211; L	</td>
<td>	ESPN	</td>
<td>	MONDAY	</td>
<td>	4,759,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	BURN NOTICE	</td>
<td>	USA	</td>
<td>	THURSDAY	</td>
<td>	4,665,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	HANNITY &#038; COLMES	</td>
<td>	FOXNC	</td>
<td>	THURSDAY	</td>
<td>	4,589,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	ARMY WIVES	</td>
<td>	LIF	</td>
<td>	SUNDAY	</td>
<td>	4,374,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	RAISING THE BAR	</td>
<td>	TNT	</td>
<td>	MONDAY	</td>
<td>	4,210,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	WWE ENTERTAINMENT (WWE RAW)	</td>
<td>	USA	</td>
<td>	MONDAY	</td>
<td>	4,209,000	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">								Source: The Nielsen Company (September 15, 2008 &#8211; September 21, 2008)		</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-cable-tv-rankings-september-15-21-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Open Tennis: 30 Years Of U.S. TV Ratings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/sports/us-open-historic-television-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/sports/us-open-historic-television-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger federer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serena williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venus williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With Roger Federer gunning for his fifth U.S. Open title this year, the tournament promises to be better than ever.  But are the U.S. Open&#8217;s TV ratings also thriving?
Since 1992, CBS&#8217;s U.S. Open telecasts have drawn roughly 2 to 3 million U.S. viewers, on average, each year. 
Last year, CBS&#8217;s U.S. Open broadcasts drew an average of 1.96 million viewers per telecast &#8212; down from almost 2.2 million viewers in 2006, but up slightly from the smallest U.S. Open TV audience since 1977: 1.94 million in 2004.
The 1999 U.S. Open telecasts claimed the largest U.S. TV ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/tennisball_racquet.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-984" title="tennisball_racquet" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/tennisball_racquet-300x195.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="98" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">With Roger Federer gunning for his fifth U.S. Open title this year, the tournament promises to be better than ever.  But are the U.S. Open&#8217;s TV ratings also thriving?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Since 1992, CBS&#8217;s U.S. Open telecasts have drawn roughly 2 to 3 million U.S. viewers, on average, each year. </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Last year, CBS&#8217;s U.S. Open broadcasts drew an average of 1.96 million viewers per telecast &#8212; down from almost 2.2 million viewers in 2006, but up slightly from the smallest U.S. Open TV audience since 1977: 1.94 million in 2004.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The 1999 U.S. Open telecasts claimed the largest U.S. TV audiences in recent memory (almost 3.5 million viewers per telecast).  But in terms of household ratings, the early Eighties remain the true glory days of U.S. Open TV viewership.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The 1980 and 1981 tournaments claimed the highest household TV ratings to date, with 5.8% of all U.S. households tuning in per telecast.  In comparison, the 1999 U.S. Open telecasts drew just 3.5% of all U.S. households.  By 2007, the average rating had decreased to 1.7%.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-955"></span>Below are historic U.S. household ratings (AA%), share, and TV audience estimates (1992 &#8211; present) for CBS&#8217;s coverage of the U.S. Open tennis tournament since 1977.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>YEAR</th>
<th># OF<br />
TELECASTS</th>
<th>AA%</th>
<th>SHARE</th>
<th>VIEWERS P2+<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>WINNERS<br />
(WOMEN/MEN)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1977</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td>5.7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">20</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Evert/Vilas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1978</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td>4.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">15</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Evert/Connors</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1979</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td>5.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">15</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Austin/McEnroe</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1980</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td>5.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">17</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Evert-Lloyd/McEnroe</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1981</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6</td>
<td>5.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">17</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Austin/McEnroe</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1982</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6</td>
<td>5.1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">16</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Evert-Lloyd/Connors</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1983</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td>5.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">14</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Navratilova/Connors</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1984</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td>4.5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Navratilova/McEnroe</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1985</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10</td>
<td>4.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">14</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Mandlikova/Lendl</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1986</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">3.7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">11</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a </td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Navratilova/Lendl</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1987</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">3.6</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">11</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a </td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Navratilova/Lendl</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1988</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7</td>
<td>4.2</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td>Graf/Wilander</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1989</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">3.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a </td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Graf/Becker</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1990</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">4.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a </td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Sabatini/Sampras</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1991</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">13</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Seles/Edberg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1992</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7</td>
<td>3.2</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,999</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Seles/Edberg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1993</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">2.6</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,422</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Graf/Sampras</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1994</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10</td>
<td>3.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,872</td>
<td>Sanchez-Vicario /<br />
Agassi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1995</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td>3.2</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3,037</td>
<td>Graf/Sampras</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1996</td>
<td>13 (Excludes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,413</td>
<td>Graf/Sampras</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1996</td>
<td>16 (Includes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,415</td>
<td>Graf/Sampras</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1997</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">13</td>
<td>2.3</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,269</td>
<td>Hingis/Rafter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1998</td>
<td>12 (Excludes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>2.3</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,237</td>
<td>Davenport/Rafter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1998</td>
<td>13 (Includes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,201</td>
<td>Davenport/Rafter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1999</td>
<td>12 (Excludes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>3.5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3,486</td>
<td>S. Williams/Agassi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1999</td>
<td>13 (Includes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>3.4</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3,384</td>
<td>S. Williams/Agassi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2000</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,886</td>
<td>V. Williams/Safin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2001</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10</td>
<td>3.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3,171</td>
<td>V. Williams/Hewitt</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2002</td>
<td>7 (Excludes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>3.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3,179</td>
<td>S. Williams/Sampras</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2002</td>
<td>11 (Includes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,643</td>
<td>S. Williams/Sampras</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2003</td>
<td>8 (Excludes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>1.9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,080</td>
<td>Henin-Hardenne /<br />
Roddick</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2003</td>
<td>11 (Includes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>1.9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,062</td>
<td>Henin-Hardenne /<br />
Roddick</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2004</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">11</td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1,942</td>
<td>Kuznetsova/Federer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2005</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10</td>
<td>2.1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,367</td>
<td>Clijsters/Federer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2006</td>
<td>10 (Excludes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>2.1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,359</td>
<td>Sharapova/Federer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2006</td>
<td>11 (Includes Rain Coverage)</td>
<td>2.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,186</td>
<td>Sharapova/Federer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2007</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9</td>
<td>1.7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1,959</td>
<td>Henin/Federer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company (1977 &#8211; 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Note: Effective January 1, 2006, data includes Live and Same Day DVR viewing.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/sports/us-open-historic-television-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Tropic Thunder&#8221; Three-Peats at Box Office</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tropic-thunder-three-peats-at-box-office/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tropic-thunder-three-peats-at-box-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropic thunder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Tropic Thunder” topped the box office charts for a third straight weekend, earning approximately $14.6 million to close the summer movie season, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
&#8220;Babylon A.D.&#8221; claimed second place, taking in approximately $11.5 million over the weekend, and &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221; finished a close third with approximately 11.1 million. 
Below are last weekend’s box-office totals from Nielsen EDI, as of Monday, September 1, 2008.



RANK
FILM
STUDIO
WEEKEND
GROSS


1
Tropic Thunder
DREAMWORKS / PARAMOUNT
$14,602,121
$86.9


2
Babylon A.D.
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX
$11,541,571
$11.5


3
The Dark Knight
WARNER BROS.
$11,127,290
$504.8


4
The House Bunny
SONY PICTURES
$10,177,701
$29.7


5
Traitor
OVERTURE FILMS
$10,006,327
$11.5


6
Death Race
UNIVERSAL
$7,889,755
$24.7


7
Disaster Movie
LIONSGATE
$6,945,535
$6.9


8
Mamma Mia!
UNIVERSAL
$5,421,815
$132.5


9
Pineapple Express
SONY PICTURES
$4,448,782
$80.8


10
Star Wars: The Clone Wars
WARNER BROS.
$3,764,410
$30.7


Source: The Hollywood Reporter / ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Tropic Thunder” topped the box office charts for a third straight weekend, earning approximately $14.6 million to close the summer movie season, according to <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3ib225d0cb90c027dd6a25e62736b7dec7" target="_blank"><span style="color: #6ea3ba;">The Hollywood Reporter</span></a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Babylon A.D.&#8221; claimed second place, taking in approximately $11.5 million over the weekend, and &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221; finished a close third with approximately 11.1 million. </p>
<p>Below are last weekend’s box-office totals from Nielsen EDI, as of Monday, September 1, 2008.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>FILM</th>
<th>STUDIO</th>
<th>WEEKEND</th>
<th>GROSS</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Tropic Thunder</td>
<td>DREAMWORKS / PARAMOUNT</td>
<td>$14,602,121</td>
<td>$86.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Babylon A.D.</td>
<td>TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX</td>
<td>$11,541,571</td>
<td>$11.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>The Dark Knight</td>
<td>WARNER BROS.</td>
<td>$11,127,290</td>
<td>$504.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>The House Bunny</td>
<td>SONY PICTURES</td>
<td>$10,177,701</td>
<td>$29.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Traitor</td>
<td>OVERTURE FILMS</td>
<td>$10,006,327</td>
<td>$11.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Death Race</td>
<td>UNIVERSAL</td>
<td>$7,889,755</td>
<td>$24.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Disaster Movie</td>
<td>LIONSGATE</td>
<td>$6,945,535</td>
<td>$6.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Mamma Mia!</td>
<td>UNIVERSAL</td>
<td>$5,421,815</td>
<td>$132.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Pineapple Express</td>
<td>SONY PICTURES</td>
<td>$4,448,782</td>
<td>$80.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Star Wars: The Clone Wars</td>
<td>WARNER BROS.</td>
<td>$3,764,410</td>
<td>$30.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Hollywood Reporter / Nielsen EDI</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tropic-thunder-three-peats-at-box-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Tropic Thunder&#8221; Remains Tops at Box Office</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tropic-thunder-remains-tops-at-box-office/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tropic-thunder-remains-tops-at-box-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Tropic Thunder” took in an estimated $16.2 million over the weekend to claim the top spot at The Box Office for the second straight weekend, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
The PG-13 comedy &#8220;The House Bunny&#8221; claimed second place, raking in $14.5 million over the weekend.  Below are last weekend’s box-office totals from Nielsen EDI as of Sunday, August 24.



RANK
FILM
STUDIO
WEEKEND
GROSS


1
Tropic Thunder
DREAMWORKS / PARAMOUNT
$16,272,195
$65.8


2
The House Bunny
SONY PICTURES
$14,533,702
$14.5


3
Death Race
UNIVERSAL
$12,621,090
$12.6


4
The Dark Knight
WARNER BROS.
$10,542,424
$489.4


5
Star Wars: The Clone Wars
WARNER BROS.
$5,661,456
$25.0


6
Pineapple Express
SONY PICTURES
$5,452,163
$73.8


7
Mirrors
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX
$5,010,663
$20.2


8
Mamma Mia!
UNIVERSAL
$4,314,840
$124.5


9
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
UNIVERSAL
$4,177,950
$93.9


10
The Longshots
MGM STUDIOS
$4,080,687
$4.1


Source: The Hollywood Reporter ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Tropic Thunder” took in an estimated $16.2 million over the weekend to claim the top spot at The Box Office for the second straight weekend, according to <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i67f2ad037eba0dd6061e1750cf64de35" target="_blank"><span style="color: #6ea3ba;">The Hollywood Reporter</span></a>.</p>
<p>The PG-13 comedy &#8220;The House Bunny&#8221; claimed second place, raking in $14.5 million over the weekend.  Below are last weekend’s box-office totals from Nielsen EDI as of Sunday, August 24.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>FILM</th>
<th>STUDIO</th>
<th>WEEKEND</th>
<th>GROSS</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Tropic Thunder</td>
<td>DREAMWORKS / PARAMOUNT</td>
<td>$16,272,195</td>
<td>$65.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>The House Bunny</td>
<td>SONY PICTURES</td>
<td>$14,533,702</td>
<td>$14.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Death Race</td>
<td>UNIVERSAL</td>
<td>$12,621,090</td>
<td>$12.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>The Dark Knight</td>
<td>WARNER BROS.</td>
<td>$10,542,424</td>
<td>$489.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Star Wars: The Clone Wars</td>
<td>WARNER BROS.</td>
<td>$5,661,456</td>
<td>$25.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Pineapple Express</td>
<td>SONY PICTURES</td>
<td>$5,452,163</td>
<td>$73.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Mirrors</td>
<td>TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX</td>
<td>$5,010,663</td>
<td>$20.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Mamma Mia!</td>
<td>UNIVERSAL</td>
<td>$4,314,840</td>
<td>$124.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor</td>
<td>UNIVERSAL</td>
<td>$4,177,950</td>
<td>$93.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>The Longshots</td>
<td>MGM STUDIOS</td>
<td>$4,080,687</td>
<td>$4.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Hollywood Reporter / Nielsen EDI</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tropic-thunder-remains-tops-at-box-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

