<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; presidential politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/presidential-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Obama Inaugural Events Viewed By 30.1% In Top Markets</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raleigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv viewers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated 01/27: The updated %figures and chart reflect updated data relative to select West Coast markets.
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;
The combined overall household rating for the inauguration of President Barack Obama in the top 56 local television markets where Nielsen maintains TV meters was 30.1%.
The Raleigh-Durham market had the largest TV audience with more than 51% of households tuned in to the day&#8217;s events.






 Rank by HH Rating
 Market Name
 Market  Rank
by Number of TV Households
 Household Rating
% of TV households
in market tuned in


	1	
	Raleigh-Durham (Fayetvlle)	
	27	
	51.2	


	2	
	Washington, DC (Hagrstwn)	
	9	
	47.7	


	3	
	Norfolk-Portsmth-Newpt Nws	
	43	
	46.7	


	4	
	Baltimore	
	26	
	44.3	


	5	
	Greensboro-H.Point-W.Salem	
	46	
	42.3	


	6	
	Charlotte	
	24	
	40.8	


	7	
	West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce	
	38	
	39.6	


	8	
	Memphis	
	48	
	39.4	


	9	
	Richmond-Petersburg	
	58	
	37.2	


	10	
	Greenvll-Spart-Ashevll-And	
	36	
	35.9	


	11	
	Birmingham (Ann and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/obama_portrait_146px.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7281" title="obama_portrait_146px" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/obama_portrait_146px-146x150.jpg" alt="" width="146" height="150" /></a><strong>Updated 01/27: </strong><em>The updated %figures and chart reflect updated data relative to select West Coast markets.</em></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The combined overall household rating for the inauguration of President Barack Obama in the top 56 local television markets where Nielsen maintains TV meters was 30.1%.</p>
<p>The Raleigh-Durham market had the largest TV audience with more than 51% of households tuned in to the day&#8217;s events.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/inauguration-metered-markets-inaugural-revised-with-spill-new.pdf"><br />
</a></p>
<p><span id="more-7319"></span></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Rank by HH Rating</th>
<th> Market Name</th>
<th> Market  Rank<br />
by Number of TV Households</th>
<th> Household Rating<br />
% of TV households<br />
in market tuned in</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Raleigh-Durham (Fayetvlle)	</td>
<td>	27	</td>
<td>	51.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Washington, DC (Hagrstwn)	</td>
<td>	9	</td>
<td>	47.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	Norfolk-Portsmth-Newpt Nws	</td>
<td>	43	</td>
<td>	46.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	Baltimore	</td>
<td>	26	</td>
<td>	44.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Greensboro-H.Point-W.Salem	</td>
<td>	46	</td>
<td>	42.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Charlotte	</td>
<td>	24	</td>
<td>	40.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce	</td>
<td>	38	</td>
<td>	39.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Memphis	</td>
<td>	48	</td>
<td>	39.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Richmond-Petersburg	</td>
<td>	58	</td>
<td>	37.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Greenvll-Spart-Ashevll-And	</td>
<td>	36	</td>
<td>	35.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	11	</td>
<td>	Birmingham (Ann and Tusc)	</td>
<td>	40	</td>
<td>	35.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	12	</td>
<td>	Miami-Ft. Lauderdale	</td>
<td>	16	</td>
<td>	35.5	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	13	</td>
<td>	Knoxville	</td>
<td>	59	</td>
<td>	35.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	14	</td>
<td>	Ft. Myers-Naples	</td>
<td>	62	</td>
<td>	33.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	15	</td>
<td>	Las Vegas	</td>
<td>	42	</td>
<td>	33.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	16	</td>
<td>	Kansas City	</td>
<td>	31	</td>
<td>	32.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	17	</td>
<td>	Philadelphia	</td>
<td>	4	</td>
<td>	32.5	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	18	</td>
<td>	Nashville	</td>
<td>	29	</td>
<td>	31.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	19	</td>
<td>	Columbus, OH	</td>
<td>	32	</td>
<td>	31.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	19	</td>
<td>	New Orleans	</td>
<td>	53	</td>
<td>	31.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	21	</td>
<td>	Buffalo	</td>
<td>	51	</td>
<td>	31.0	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	22	</td>
<td>	Detroit	</td>
<td>	11	</td>
<td>	30.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	22	</td>
<td>	Pittsburgh	</td>
<td>	23	</td>
<td>	30.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	24	</td>
<td>	Providence-New Bedford	</td>
<td>	52	</td>
<td>	30.0	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	25	</td>
<td>	Dayton	</td>
<td>	64	</td>
<td>	29.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	25	</td>
<td>	Indianapolis	</td>
<td>	25	</td>
<td>	29.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	25	</td>
<td>	New York	</td>
<td>	1	</td>
<td>	29.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	28	</td>
<td>	Louisville	</td>
<td>	50	</td>
<td>	29.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	29	</td>
<td>	Atlanta	</td>
<td>	8	</td>
<td>	29.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	29	</td>
<td>	Hartford &#038; New Haven	</td>
<td>	30	</td>
<td>	29.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	31	</td>
<td>	Oklahoma City	</td>
<td>	45	</td>
<td>	29.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	32	</td>
<td>	San Antonio	</td>
<td>	37	</td>
<td>	28.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	33	</td>
<td>	Cincinnati	</td>
<td>	34	</td>
<td>	28.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	33	</td>
<td>	Jacksonville	</td>
<td>	47	</td>
<td>	28.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	35	</td>
<td>	Albuquerque-Santa Fe	</td>
<td>	44	</td>
<td>	28.5	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	36	</td>
<td>	Orlando-Daytona Bch-Melbrn	</td>
<td>	19	</td>
<td>	28.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	37	</td>
<td>	San Diego	</td>
<td>	28	</td>
<td>	28.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	38	</td>
<td>	Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota)	</td>
<td>	13	</td>
<td>	28.0	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	39	</td>
<td>	St. Louis	</td>
<td>	21	</td>
<td>	27.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	40	</td>
<td>	Chicago	</td>
<td>	3	</td>
<td>	27.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	41	</td>
<td>	Cleveland-Akron (Canton)	</td>
<td>	17	</td>
<td>	27.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	42	</td>
<td>	Houston	</td>
<td>	10	</td>
<td>	26.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	43	</td>
<td>	Los Angeles	</td>
<td>	2	</td>
<td>	26.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	44	</td>
<td>	Portland, OR	</td>
<td>	22	</td>
<td>	25.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	44	</td>
<td>	Sacramnto-Stkton-Modesto	</td>
<td>	20	</td>
<td>	25.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	44	</td>
<td>	San Francisco-Oak-San Jose	</td>
<td>	6	</td>
<td>	25.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	47	</td>
<td>	Tulsa	</td>
<td>	61	</td>
<td>	25.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	48	</td>
<td>	Milwaukee	</td>
<td>	35	</td>
<td>	25.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	49	</td>
<td>	Boston (Manchester)	</td>
<td>	7	</td>
<td>	25.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	49	</td>
<td>	Seattle-Tacoma	</td>
<td>	14	</td>
<td>	25.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	51	</td>
<td>	Austin	</td>
<td>	49	</td>
<td>	25.1	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	52	</td>
<td>	Dallas-Ft. Worth	</td>
<td>	5	</td>
<td>	24.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	53	</td>
<td>	Salt Lake City	</td>
<td>	33	</td>
<td>	23.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	54	</td>
<td>	Minneapolis-St. Paul	</td>
<td>	15	</td>
<td>	23.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	55	</td>
<td>	Phoenix (Prescott)	</td>
<td>	12	</td>
<td>	22.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	56	</td>
<td>	Denver	</td>
<td>	18	</td>
<td>	21.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">©2009 The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>See previous ratings for presidential elections <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Nixon To Bush 43: Presidential Inauguration Ratings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, January 20th, Americans will witness history with the inauguration of the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama.  How will this event compare with other inaugurations over the past 40 years?  Nielsen has compiled data about inaugural viewership since 1969.
Key findings are:

Ronald      Reagan&#8217;s 1981 inauguration drew the most viewers &#8211; almost 42 million.


First      time inaugurations of two-term presidents drew higher ratings than their      second (exception: Nixon in 1973).


The     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/white-house.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7247" title="white-house" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/white-house-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="94" /></a>On Tuesday, January 20th, Americans will witness history with the inauguration of the 44<sup>th</sup> President of the United States, Barack Obama.  How will this event compare with other inaugurations over the past 40 years?  Nielsen has compiled data about inaugural viewership since 1969.</p>
<p>Key findings are:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Ronald      Reagan&#8217;s 1981 inauguration drew the most viewers &#8211; almost 42 million.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>First      time inaugurations of two-term presidents drew higher ratings than their      second (exception: Nixon in 1973).</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The      least watched inauguration since 1969: George W. Bush in 2005, with 15.5      million.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/presidential-inauguration-1969-20051.pdf">Click this link for complete inauguration ratings 1969-2005</a></p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> PRESIDENT</th>
<th> DATE</th>
<th> Viewers P2+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">G.W.Bush</td>
<td>1/20/2005</td>
<td>15,536,652</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">G.W.Bush</td>
<td>1/20/2001</td>
<td>29,008,200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton</td>
<td>1/20/1997</td>
<td>21,583,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton</td>
<td>1/20/1993</td>
<td>29,721,041</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">G.H.Bush</td>
<td>1/20/1989</td>
<td>23,316,325</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Reagan</td>
<td>1/20/1985</td>
<td>25,053,886</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Reagan</td>
<td>1/20/1981</td>
<td>41,800,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Carter</td>
<td>1/20/1977</td>
<td>34,127,090</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Nixon</td>
<td>1/20/1973</td>
<td>32,950,900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Nixon</td>
<td>1/20/1969</td>
<td>27,007,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: © 2009 The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Box Office Sales Linked With Presidential Politics</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/box-office-sales-linked-with-presidential-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/box-office-sales-linked-with-presidential-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box officee sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discretionary entertainment spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the presidential elections impact Hollywood? 
If history is any guide, Democratic presidents are associated with larger box office sales growth.  From 1980 to 2007, box office sales grew by 2.8%, on average, during Democratic administrations, while average sales growth under Republican administrations was just 1%, according to research released Monday by Nielsen PreView.
Overall, in the past three decades, movie sales have grown almost three times faster during Democratic administrations than during GOP administrations, according to Nielsen.

The entertainment industry may be facing tough times regardless of which party takes the White House ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button15.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1663" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button15-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Will the presidential elections impact Hollywood? </p>
<p>If history is any guide, Democratic presidents are associated with larger box office sales growth.  From 1980 to 2007, box office sales grew by 2.8%, on average, during Democratic administrations, while average sales growth under Republican administrations was just 1%, according to <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1057" target="_blank">research</a> released Monday by <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/" target="_blank">Nielsen PreView</a>.</p>
<p>Overall, in the past three decades, movie sales have grown almost three times faster during Democratic administrations than during GOP administrations, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p><span id="more-1662"></span></p>
<p>The entertainment industry may be facing tough times regardless of which party takes the White House in January.</p>
<p>According to a recent Nielsen <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1057" target="_blank">study</a>, 56% of consumers said they are likely to reduce their discretionary entertainment spending, as they seek ways to reduce expenses. </p>
<p>Spending on travel and clothing may also take a hit &#8212; 51% and 41% of consumers surveyed by Nielsen plan to cut spending on those respective items.  In contrast, healthcare and housing spending were least likely to be reduced by consumers &#8212; just 9% of respondents said they will cut expenditures in those areas. </p>
<p>View Nielsen PreView’s <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1057" target="_blank">full report</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/index.jsp" target="_blank">Cast your vote</a> to help guide Nielsen PreView&#8217;s future political research. </p>
<p>Choose from among the following topics:<br />
- Democrats&#8217; vs. Republicans&#8217; media habits<br />
- Undecided voters&#8217; media habits<br />
- Dominant Web sources for political information<br />
- Changes in how American consumers access political news and information via TV and the Internet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/box-office-sales-linked-with-presidential-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

