<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Pittsburgh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/pittsburgh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bud Light Lime, GoDaddy.com Score As Most Viewed Ads During Super Bowl XLIII</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bud-light-lime-godaddycom-score-as-most-viewed-ads-during-super-bowl-xliii/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bud-light-lime-godaddycom-score-as-most-viewed-ads-during-super-bowl-xliii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anheuser-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bud Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budweiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLIII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertisers during Super Bowl XLIII reached the largest audience of any Super Bowl game &#8212; the second most-viewed television event of all-time, according to Nielsen.  Ads for Bud Light Lime and GoDaddy.com were seen by 103.2 million viewers last Sunday.
According to Nielsen&#8217;s annual report on Super Bowl advertising and overall viewing, an average of 98.7 million U.S. viewers tuned in to the game.  Almost 152 million people watched the last six minutes of the game, giving it the largest reach by a TV event ever.
Other key findings include:

Total commercial airtime ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ref-touchdown.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8016" title="ref-touchdown" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ref-touchdown-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Advertisers during Super Bowl XLIII reached the largest audience of any Super Bowl game &#8212; the second most-viewed television event of all-time, according to Nielsen.  Ads for Bud Light Lime and GoDaddy.com were seen by 103.2 million viewers last Sunday.</p>
<p>According to Nielsen&#8217;s annual report on Super Bowl advertising and overall viewing, an average of 98.7 million U.S. viewers tuned in to the game.  Almost 152 million people watched the last six minutes of the game, giving it the largest reach by a TV event ever.</p>
<p>Other key findings include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Total commercial airtime during the game was 38 minutes and 5 seconds, and 48 unique brands competed for viewers&#8217; attention.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The most-liked ad was Budweiser&#8217;s spot featuring a Clydesdale competing with a Dalmation in a game of fetch.  This was also the most-recalled ad of the game.  Altogether, Anheuser-Busch produced three of the most recalled ads.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Emotional and feel-good ads from Budweiser and Pedigree resounded with women, while med tended to like humorous commercials from Pepsi and Doritos.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Locally, Pittsburgh had the #1 Metered Market performance with a 53.5 household rating, while Phoenix was #9 with a 47.5 household rating.</li>
</ul>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s complete press release about its annual report on Super Bowl advertising and viewing with more detailed stats and data can be viewed <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/post-super-bowl-xliii-recap-release.pdf">here.</a></p>
<p>View commercials, storyboards, and ratings from the Super Bowl since 1999, via <a href="https://www.nielsenmedia.com/monitorplus/superbowl/">Monitor Plus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bud-light-lime-godaddycom-score-as-most-viewed-ads-during-super-bowl-xliii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team Markets, Close Games, and HDTV Pace Super Bowl Viewing</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/team-markets-close-games-and-hdtv-pace-super-bowl-viewing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/team-markets-close-games-and-hdtv-pace-super-bowl-viewing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minute by minute ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the anticipation surrounding Sunday&#8217;s big game, an analysis of national and local ratings from past Super Bowls provides insight into the viewership of this year&#8217;s matchup:

In terms of DMA&#8217;s (Designated Market Area), Phoenix is ranked 12th and Pittsburgh 23rd of the 56 metered markets. The 2006 Super Bowl featured a similar match-up with Seattle, ranked the 13th largest DMA, against Pittsburgh, then 22nd. That game received a 57.4 rating in Pittsburgh and 54.4 in Seattle (compared to 41.6 nationally).


From 1999-2008, the highest single-year metered market performance was delivered in Jacksonville ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the anticipation surrounding Sunday&#8217;s big game, an analysis of national and local ratings from past Super Bowls provides insight into the viewership of this year&#8217;s matchup:</p>
<ul>
<li>In terms of DMA&#8217;s (Designated Market Area), <strong>Phoenix</strong> is ranked 12th and <strong>Pittsburgh</strong> 23<sup>rd</sup> of the 56 metered markets. The 2006 Super Bowl featured a similar match-up with <strong>Seattle</strong>, ranked the 13<sup>th</sup> largest DMA, against Pittsburgh, then 22<sup>nd</sup>. That game received a 57.4 rating in Pittsburgh and 54.4 in Seattle (compared to 41.6 nationally).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>From 1999-2008, the highest single-year metered market performance was delivered in <strong>Jacksonville</strong><strong> </strong>in 2005 (NE-PHI played in Jacksonville) with a 58.9 HH rating. For a participating team&#8217;s market, <strong>Atlanta</strong> owns the largest HH rating with a 58.2 in 1999 (DEN-ATL). Over the past decade, the <strong>Kansas</strong><strong> City </strong>DMA has averaged the highest household rating, with 49.5% of television households tuning in to the Super Bowl each year (see chart below).</li>
</ul>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>MARKET</th>
<th>AVG. HH RATING</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Kansas City</td>
<td>49.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Jacksonville</td>
<td>49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td>48.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Denver</td>
<td>47.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>New Orleans</td>
<td>47.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Washington, DC</td>
<td>46.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Buffalo</td>
<td>46.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Tampa-St. Pete</td>
<td>46.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Orlando-Daytona Bch-Melbrn</td>
<td>46.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>46.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">source: 2009 The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<ul>
<li>Last year&#8217;s thrilling Super Bowl owes a large part of its record-breaking ratings&#8217; success to a late-game viewer surge. At 10:02 PM, the final minute of the game, <strong>viewership peaked at a 51.3 HH rating, 72 share and over 112 million viewers</strong>. The final 30 minutes of the broadcast delivered a 47.5 HH rating. This was a 13% increase compared to all prior minutes (42.0).</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7814" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/min_x_min_sb42.png" alt="" width="530" height="350" /></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Since 2002, <strong>every Super Bowl has had its highest rating point occur in the 4<sup>th</sup> quarter</strong> and - in all but one instance - after 10PM ET (the Bears-Colts ended at 9:57PM ET). Additionally, Super Bowls that went down to the wire (NE-STL, NE-CAR, NYG-NE) experience a late increase in share percent, while games that were less competitive (TB-OAK, NE-PHI, PITT-SEA, IND-CHI) had share levels that were flat or declining in the final half hour.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="Times New Roman;"><span style="14pt;"><strong>The Super Bowl ratings are higher in HD</strong> households. Last year&#8217;s game received a 56.5 rating in HD capable/receivable homes. These homes over-indexed the composite HH rating by 31%.</span></span></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/team-markets-close-games-and-hdtv-pace-super-bowl-viewing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPORTS WRAP: A Tale Of Two (Pennsylvania) Cities</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-a-tale-of-two-pennsylvania-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-a-tale-of-two-pennsylvania-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Falcons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household TV rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local market rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nittany Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State Buckeyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia eagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Series]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=3600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each week, Nielsen Sports analysts offer their take on the biggest sports media headlines.
This past weekend, Senators John McCain and Barack Obama faced some tough competition in Pennsylvania. 
With the Phillies playing in the World Series and college and pro football games on both Saturday and Sunday, there was no shortage of TV sports options for politics-weary Pennsylvanians, looking for a break from presidential campaigning.
The action started on Saturday in western Pennsylvania, as the Penn State Nittany Lions took on their Big 10 Rival, the Ohio State Buckeyes.  In nearby Pittsburgh, 20.8% of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Each week, </em><a href="http://www.nielsensports.com/" target="_blank"><em>Nielsen Sports</em></a><em> analysts offer their take on the biggest sports media headlines.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seats5.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3603" title="seats5" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seats5.gif" alt="" width="150" height="104" /></a>This past weekend, Senators John McCain and Barack Obama faced some tough competition in Pennsylvania. </p>
<p>With the Phillies playing in the World Series and college and pro football games on both Saturday and Sunday, there was no shortage of TV sports options for politics-weary Pennsylvanians, looking for a break from presidential campaigning.</p>
<p>The action started on Saturday in western Pennsylvania, as the Penn State Nittany Lions took on their Big 10 Rival, the Ohio State Buckeyes.  In nearby Pittsburgh, 20.8% of local TV households watched on ABC as Penn State maintained its undefeated status.</p>
<p><span id="more-3600"></span></p>
<p>On Sunday, 44.1% of Pittsburgh households &#8212; the highest local market rating earned by any NFL game so far this season &#8212; tuned in to watch the Pittsburgh Steelers take on the New York Giants.  Sunday&#8217;s TV audience topped the Pittsburgh market&#8217;s previous season high NFL rating of 41.1, earned when the Steelers played their cross-state rival, the Philadelphia Eagles, on Sunday, Sept. 21.</p>
<p>Across the state in Philadelphia, baseball fans were glued to their tubes this weekend for Games 3 and 4 of the MLB World Series.  On Saturday night, 28.1% of local Philadelphia households tuned in for Game 3, with 93% of that audience staying with the game, through multiple rain delays, until its conclusion at 1:48am EST. </p>
<p>Undetered by a late night of baseball, Philadelphians were back in front of their televisions Sunday afternoon for the Eagles vs. Atlanta Falcons football game, which earned a 27.9 local household rating.  The TV sports marathon continued into the evening, when 38.9% of local Philadelphia households tuned in to watch Game 4 of the World Series.</p>
<p>Stay tuned on NielsenWire for <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/2008-world-series-us-primetime-daily-tv-ratings/" target="_blank">daily updates</a> on World Series national TV ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-a-tale-of-two-pennsylvania-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Your City&#8217;s Entertainment &#8220;Personality&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/whats-your-citys-entertainment-personality/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/whats-your-citys-entertainment-personality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakersfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chattanooga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Paso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment conumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Lauderdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynchburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie going]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen PreView]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raleigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality TV shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roanoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock concerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saginaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Antonio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Petersburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syracuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to entertainment consumption, all U.S. cities are not created equal.
Take Atlanta, Kansas City, Los Angeles, New York City, and San Francisco &#8211; five of 21 cities that are home to some of the nation’s most voracious media consumers.  According to a study of entertainment consumption in 65 major U.S. cities, released Monday by Nielsen PreView, residents of these cities love opening weekend movie-going, rock concerts, reality TV, and newspapers.
In contrast, residents of Bakersfield (California), El Paso, Flint/Saginaw/Bay City (Michigan), Memphis, Miami/Fort Lauderdale, and San Antonio have one-track entertainment minds: ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/times_square_with-cab.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2825" title="times_square_with-cab" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/times_square_with-cab-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>When it comes to entertainment consumption, all U.S. cities are <em>not</em> created equal.</p>
<p>Take Atlanta, Kansas City, Los Angeles, New York City, and San Francisco<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/intellectualrockers1.pdf"></a> &#8211; five of 21 cities that are home to some of the nation’s most voracious media consumers.  According to a <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1059" target="_blank">study</a> of entertainment consumption in 65 major U.S. cities, released Monday by Nielsen PreView, residents of these cities love opening weekend movie-going, rock concerts, reality TV, and newspapers.</p>
<p>In contrast, residents of Bakersfield (California), El Paso, Flint/Saginaw/Bay City (Michigan), Memphis, Miami/Fort Lauderdale, and San Antonio have one-track entertainment minds: they flock to movie theaters for new releases, but eschew almost all other forms of entertainment, ranking lowest nationwide in newspaper and reality TV consumption, according to Nielsen. </p>
<p>Chicagoans, Pittsburghers, Bostonians, and residents of Green Bay (Wisconsin)<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/tailgaters.pdf"></a> were similarly single-minded &#8211; about sports.  Never mind the movies, these cities love heading to the stadium for a game – or perhaps a rock concert, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>Read Nielsen PreView’s complete <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1059" target="_blank">report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/whats-your-citys-entertainment-personality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2008: Where Are The Independent Voters?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat-leaning Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican-leaning Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New England &#8212; according to a recent analysis from Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron.
The study, which asked respondents in 81 U.S. cities to select the political party label that best describes how they see themselves &#8211; regardless of how they may have voted in the past, found that Boston, Providence, R.I., and Hartford, Conn. have the highest percentages of adults who consider themselves to be &#8220;Independents.&#8221; 
In contrast, Pittsburgh, Lexington, K.Y., and Oklahoma City, O.K. have the smallest percentages of self-identified Independents. 

Nationally, 27% of adults consider themselves ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button16.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1683" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button16-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In New England &#8212; according to a recent analysis from Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron.</p>
<p>The study, which asked respondents in 81 U.S. cities to select the political party label that best describes how they see themselves &#8211; regardless of how they may have voted in the past, found that Boston, Providence, R.I., and Hartford, Conn. have the highest percentages of adults who consider themselves to be &#8220;Independents.&#8221; </p>
<p>In contrast, Pittsburgh, Lexington, K.Y., and Oklahoma City, O.K. have the smallest percentages of self-identified Independents. </p>
<p><span id="more-1680"></span></p>
<p>Nationally, 27% of adults consider themselves to be politically Independent.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed Independents*</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Providence/New Bedford, RI</td>
<td>47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Hartford/New Haven, CT</td>
<td>41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Des Moines/Ames, IA</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Green Bay/Appleton, WI</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Spokane, WA</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Seattle/Tacoma, WA</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Grand Rapids/Kalamazoo/Battle Creek, MI</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: Self-Proclaimed Independents include those leaning Democrat and Republican.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Scarborough&#8217;s survey also examined “Leaning Independents” &#8212; those adults who described themselves in Scarborough&#8217;s study as “Independent, but feel closer to Democrat,” or “Independent, but feel closer to Republican.”</p>
<p>Seattle and Providence, R.I. had the highest percentages of Democrat-leaning Independents (17%), while Salt Lake City and Spokane, W.A. had the highest percentages of Republican-leaning Independents (15%).</p>
<p>Nationally, 9% of adults identified themselves as Democrat-leaning Independents, while 8% of adults characterized themselves as Republican-leaning Independents.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed<br />
Democrat-Leaning Independents</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed<br />
Democrat-Leaning Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Seattle, WA</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Providence, RI</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Des Moines, IA</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flint, MI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Austin, TX</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Honolulu, HI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed<br />
Republican-Leaning Independents</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed<br />
Republican-Leaning Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Salt Lake City, UT</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Spokane, WA</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Grand Rapids, MI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Birmingham, AL</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Indianapolis, IN</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Milwaukee, WI</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Flint, MI</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Houston, TX</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://www.scarborough.com/press_releases/Politics%20FINAL%206.17.08.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As U.S. Economy Slips, Coupon Clipping Climbs</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/as-the-economy-slips-coupon-clipping-climbs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/as-the-economy-slips-coupon-clipping-climbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount coupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scranton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toledo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes-Barre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coupon clipping is on the rise, according to Nielsen.
In June, a Nielsen survey of 50,000 consumers found that nearly one-third used grocery coupons once a week or more.  In December 2007, just one-fourth of those surveyed were clipping coupons at that rate, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported Thursday. 
According to a separate study by Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron, Milwaukee residents reported the highest rates of coupon clipping &#8212; 40% of all city households use grocery coupons once a week or more. 
Rochester, NY ranked second, with 38% of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/discount_coupons.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-544" style="float: left;" title="discount_coupons" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/discount_coupons-201x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>Coupon clipping is on the rise, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>In June, a Nielsen survey of 50,000 consumers found that nearly one-third used grocery coupons once a week or more.  In December 2007, just one-fourth of those surveyed were clipping coupons at that rate, the <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08234/905855-28.stm" target="_blank">Pittsburgh Post-Gazette</a> reported Thursday. </p>
<p>According to a separate study by Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron, Milwaukee residents reported the highest rates of coupon clipping &#8212; 40% of all city households use grocery coupons once a week or more. </p>
<p>Rochester, NY ranked second, with 38% of households clipping grocery coupons with this frequency, while Buffalo, NY; Toledo and Columbus, OH; Hartford and New Haven, CT; and Pittsburgh, Wilkes-Barre, and Scranton, PA, where 36% of households are regular coupons clippers, tied for third place. </p>
<p>Albuquerque and Sante Fe, NM households had the lowest rate of coupon clipping &#8212; just 14% use coupons on a regular basis, according to Scarborough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/as-the-economy-slips-coupon-clipping-climbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
