<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Phoenix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/phoenix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bud Light Lime, GoDaddy.com Score As Most Viewed Ads During Super Bowl XLIII</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bud-light-lime-godaddycom-score-as-most-viewed-ads-during-super-bowl-xliii/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bud-light-lime-godaddycom-score-as-most-viewed-ads-during-super-bowl-xliii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anheuser-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bud Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budweiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLIII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertisers during Super Bowl XLIII reached the largest audience of any Super Bowl game &#8212; the second most-viewed television event of all-time, according to Nielsen.  Ads for Bud Light Lime and GoDaddy.com were seen by 103.2 million viewers last Sunday.
According to Nielsen&#8217;s annual report on Super Bowl advertising and overall viewing, an average of 98.7 million U.S. viewers tuned in to the game.  Almost 152 million people watched the last six minutes of the game, giving it the largest reach by a TV event ever.
Other key findings include:

Total commercial airtime ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ref-touchdown.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8016" title="ref-touchdown" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ref-touchdown-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Advertisers during Super Bowl XLIII reached the largest audience of any Super Bowl game &#8212; the second most-viewed television event of all-time, according to Nielsen.  Ads for Bud Light Lime and GoDaddy.com were seen by 103.2 million viewers last Sunday.</p>
<p>According to Nielsen&#8217;s annual report on Super Bowl advertising and overall viewing, an average of 98.7 million U.S. viewers tuned in to the game.  Almost 152 million people watched the last six minutes of the game, giving it the largest reach by a TV event ever.</p>
<p>Other key findings include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Total commercial airtime during the game was 38 minutes and 5 seconds, and 48 unique brands competed for viewers&#8217; attention.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The most-liked ad was Budweiser&#8217;s spot featuring a Clydesdale competing with a Dalmation in a game of fetch.  This was also the most-recalled ad of the game.  Altogether, Anheuser-Busch produced three of the most recalled ads.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Emotional and feel-good ads from Budweiser and Pedigree resounded with women, while med tended to like humorous commercials from Pepsi and Doritos.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Locally, Pittsburgh had the #1 Metered Market performance with a 53.5 household rating, while Phoenix was #9 with a 47.5 household rating.</li>
</ul>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s complete press release about its annual report on Super Bowl advertising and viewing with more detailed stats and data can be viewed <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/post-super-bowl-xliii-recap-release.pdf">here.</a></p>
<p>View commercials, storyboards, and ratings from the Super Bowl since 1999, via <a href="https://www.nielsenmedia.com/monitorplus/superbowl/">Monitor Plus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bud-light-lime-godaddycom-score-as-most-viewed-ads-during-super-bowl-xliii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team Markets, Close Games, and HDTV Pace Super Bowl Viewing</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/team-markets-close-games-and-hdtv-pace-super-bowl-viewing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/team-markets-close-games-and-hdtv-pace-super-bowl-viewing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minute by minute ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the anticipation surrounding Sunday&#8217;s big game, an analysis of national and local ratings from past Super Bowls provides insight into the viewership of this year&#8217;s matchup:

In terms of DMA&#8217;s (Designated Market Area), Phoenix is ranked 12th and Pittsburgh 23rd of the 56 metered markets. The 2006 Super Bowl featured a similar match-up with Seattle, ranked the 13th largest DMA, against Pittsburgh, then 22nd. That game received a 57.4 rating in Pittsburgh and 54.4 in Seattle (compared to 41.6 nationally).


From 1999-2008, the highest single-year metered market performance was delivered in Jacksonville ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the anticipation surrounding Sunday&#8217;s big game, an analysis of national and local ratings from past Super Bowls provides insight into the viewership of this year&#8217;s matchup:</p>
<ul>
<li>In terms of DMA&#8217;s (Designated Market Area), <strong>Phoenix</strong> is ranked 12th and <strong>Pittsburgh</strong> 23<sup>rd</sup> of the 56 metered markets. The 2006 Super Bowl featured a similar match-up with <strong>Seattle</strong>, ranked the 13<sup>th</sup> largest DMA, against Pittsburgh, then 22<sup>nd</sup>. That game received a 57.4 rating in Pittsburgh and 54.4 in Seattle (compared to 41.6 nationally).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>From 1999-2008, the highest single-year metered market performance was delivered in <strong>Jacksonville</strong><strong> </strong>in 2005 (NE-PHI played in Jacksonville) with a 58.9 HH rating. For a participating team&#8217;s market, <strong>Atlanta</strong> owns the largest HH rating with a 58.2 in 1999 (DEN-ATL). Over the past decade, the <strong>Kansas</strong><strong> City </strong>DMA has averaged the highest household rating, with 49.5% of television households tuning in to the Super Bowl each year (see chart below).</li>
</ul>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>MARKET</th>
<th>AVG. HH RATING</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Kansas City</td>
<td>49.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Jacksonville</td>
<td>49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td>48.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Denver</td>
<td>47.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>New Orleans</td>
<td>47.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Washington, DC</td>
<td>46.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Buffalo</td>
<td>46.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Tampa-St. Pete</td>
<td>46.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Orlando-Daytona Bch-Melbrn</td>
<td>46.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>46.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">source: 2009 The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<ul>
<li>Last year&#8217;s thrilling Super Bowl owes a large part of its record-breaking ratings&#8217; success to a late-game viewer surge. At 10:02 PM, the final minute of the game, <strong>viewership peaked at a 51.3 HH rating, 72 share and over 112 million viewers</strong>. The final 30 minutes of the broadcast delivered a 47.5 HH rating. This was a 13% increase compared to all prior minutes (42.0).</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7814" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/min_x_min_sb42.png" alt="" width="530" height="350" /></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Since 2002, <strong>every Super Bowl has had its highest rating point occur in the 4<sup>th</sup> quarter</strong> and - in all but one instance - after 10PM ET (the Bears-Colts ended at 9:57PM ET). Additionally, Super Bowls that went down to the wire (NE-STL, NE-CAR, NYG-NE) experience a late increase in share percent, while games that were less competitive (TB-OAK, NE-PHI, PITT-SEA, IND-CHI) had share levels that were flat or declining in the final half hour.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="Times New Roman;"><span style="14pt;"><strong>The Super Bowl ratings are higher in HD</strong> households. Last year&#8217;s game received a 56.5 rating in HD capable/receivable homes. These homes over-indexed the composite HH rating by 31%.</span></span></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/team-markets-close-games-and-hdtv-pace-super-bowl-viewing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down To A Science: Pinpointing Retail Growth Markets</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/down-to-a-science-pinpointing-retail-growth-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/down-to-a-science-pinpointing-retail-growth-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 - 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bend Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brownsville Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coeur d’Alene Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corvallis Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversified employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast-growing metros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fastest growing U.S. markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greensboro North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growing Hispanic population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-potential retail markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle shopping centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Alamos New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Claritas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=4173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the current, sluggish economic climate, retailers will have to look hard to find growth opportunities in the U.S.
According to Nielsen Claritas, they might start by taking a closer look at large, fast-growing metro areas, like Atlanta, Dallas, and Phoenix. 
These three markets ranked as the top three fastest growing U.S. markets in the last eight years &#8212; and could offer the retail industry some hard-to-come-by expansion opportunities, Nielsen reported in a new study released Monday.
&#8220;While some of these markets like Phoenix and Los Angeles have been hard hit by the recent wave ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/population_growth_graphic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4179" title="population_growth_graphic" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/population_growth_graphic-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a>Given the current, sluggish economic climate, retailers will have to look hard to find growth opportunities in the U.S.</p>
<p>According to Nielsen Claritas, they might start by taking a closer look at large, fast-growing metro areas, like Atlanta, Dallas, and Phoenix. </p>
<p>These three markets ranked as the top three fastest growing U.S. markets in the last eight years &#8212; and could offer the retail industry some hard-to-come-by expansion opportunities, Nielsen <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/press_release1.pdf">reported</a> in a <a href="http://www.claritas.com/marketing/registration/growth-no-growth-whitepaper-reg.jsp" target="_blank">new study</a> released Monday.</p>
<p>&#8220;While some of these markets like Phoenix and Los Angeles have been hard hit by the recent wave of foreclosures, there has been no mass exodus from these markets or anywhere else.  People who have foreclosed most likely have not left the market but rather have just become renters,&#8221; Mike Mancini, Vice President of Data Product Management, Nielsen Claritas, and co-author of the new study, noted.  &#8220;Faltering markets, such as these, will likely rebound and continue to grow &#8212; and their underlying demographics are solid.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-4173"></span></p>
<p>As part of the study, Nielsen also identified seven key factors that correlate strongly with fast-growing, high-potential retail markets:</p>
<p>1) large land areas<br />
2) booming suburban rings<br />
3) widespread affluence<br />
4) a growing Hispanic population<br />
5) diversified employment<br />
6) long commutes<br />
7) the presence of lifestyle shopping centers</p>
<p>These indicators can be combined with demographic projections to identify markets that are likely to lead the way to economic recovery in the coming years.</p>
<p>In the meantime, according to Nielsen&#8217;s study, retailers looking for expansion opportunities should focus on booming college towns and resort locations, like Las Vegas, Austin, Texas, and Bend, Oregon; underdog college towns, like Columbia, Missouri, Corvallis, Oregon, and<br />
Greensboro, North Carolina; knowledge worker havens, like Los Alamos, New Mexico, San Jose, California, Boulder, Colorado, and Minneapolis; and up-and-coming communities, like New Orleans, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, and Brownsville, Texas.</p>
<p>View the <a href="http://www.claritas.com/marketing/registration/growth-no-growth-whitepaper-reg.jsp" target="_blank">study</a> and accompanying <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/press_release.pdf">press release</a> and <a href="http://www.claritas.com/eDownloads/webinar/Nielsen-Claritas-Webinar-New-Growth-103008.pdf" target="_blank">presentation</a>. </p>
<p>Download Nielsen Claritas&#8217;s October 30 <a href="http://www.claritas.com/eDownloads/webinar/Nielsen-Claritas-Webinar-New-Growth-Video-103008.zip " target="_blank">Webinar</a>, &#8220;New Leading Indicators of Growth &#8212; Finding Opportunity in a Slow-Growth Environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Learn more about finding growth in challenging times, in the <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/issue_13/" target="_blank">December issue</a> of Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/issue_13/finding_growth_in" target="_blank">&#8220;Consumer Insight&#8221;</a> online newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/down-to-a-science-pinpointing-retail-growth-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
