<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Phil Lempert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/phil-lempert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Men’s Hair Care Sales Hold Firm</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/men%e2%80%99s-hair-care-sales-hold-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/men%e2%80%99s-hair-care-sales-hold-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair coloring products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Lempert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even in a recession, sales of most men&#8217;s hair care products are expected to remain steady, according to data from Nielsen&#8217;s Homescan Consumer Facts report.  As male vanity continues to be all the rage, some sectors have shown solid growth: hair coloring grew 5.7 percent in 2008 over 2007, and in that year, growth was a miniscule 1.7 percent after two successive years of declining sales.   New products such as brush-in gel and liquid colorings drove last year&#8217;s growth.
Dollar sales of hair preparations such as gels, pomade and waxes slowed ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/hairspray.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7918" title="spray" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/hairspray-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="116" height="116" /></a>Even in a recession, sales of most men&#8217;s hair care products are expected to remain steady, according to data from Nielsen&#8217;s Homescan Consumer Facts report.  As male vanity continues to be all the rage, some sectors have shown solid growth: hair coloring grew 5.7 percent in 2008 over 2007, and in that year, growth was a miniscule 1.7 percent after two successive years of declining sales.   New products such as brush-in gel and liquid colorings drove last year&#8217;s growth.</p>
<p>Dollar sales of hair preparations such as gels, pomade and waxes slowed but continued four years of strong growth.  In 2008, dollar sales were up a modest 1.8 percent after growing 13.5 percent in 2007, 13.4 percent in 2006 and 7.7 percent in 2005.</p>
<p>Sales of men&#8217;s hair spray continued to collapse: they fell 7 percent in dollars to $14.1 million and a decline of 7.2 percent in unit volume.</p>
<p>This report was originally featured in the January issue of Facts, Figures &amp; the Future, a monthly e-publication focused on delivering the latest consumer data and trend information to members of the Food Marketing Institute and clients of Nielsen. Facts, Figures &amp; the Future is published by The Lempert Report/Consumer Insight, Inc. and is sponsored by the Food Marketing Institute and Nielsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/men%e2%80%99s-hair-care-sales-hold-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chocolate Candy Sales Start To Melt</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/chocolate-candy-sales-start-to-melt/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/chocolate-candy-sales-start-to-melt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Lempert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans&#8217; affinity for chocolate is widespread and well-known.  Its household penetration is 97.3 percent, and 96.7 percent of households repeatedly buy chocolate during the year.  In a twelve-month period, Americans bought chocolate candy on nearly 19 occasions.
But even this ubiquitous treat doesn&#8217;t seem to be immune to current economic conditions.  Since summer, equalized unit volume (EUV) has dropped uncharacteristically as consumers try to save money in every possible category.  Since July 2008, EUV sales have declined from 1.7 percent to 7.3 percent per month.  The category includes four segments: chocolate ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chocolate.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7822" title="chocolate" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chocolate-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Americans&#8217; affinity for chocolate is widespread and well-known.  Its household penetration is 97.3 percent, and 96.7 percent of households repeatedly buy chocolate during the year.  In a twelve-month period, Americans bought chocolate candy on nearly 19 occasions.</p>
<p>But even this ubiquitous treat doesn&#8217;t seem to be immune to current economic conditions.  Since summer, equalized unit volume (EUV) has dropped uncharacteristically as consumers try to save money in every possible category.  Since July 2008, EUV sales have declined from 1.7 percent to 7.3 percent per month.  The category includes four segments: chocolate candy, specials, miniatures and dietetic.</p>
<p>This trend is particularly troubling as chocolate candy has been the growth engine of candy overall, and on a full-year basis, that remains true: total chocolate candy sales increased 2.1 percent to $7.5 billion, according to Nielsen.  Overall, non-chocolate candy sales moved up 1.6 percent to $2.5 billion.</p>
<p>But it remains to be seen if chocolate candy can provide a little bit of comfort to Americans during these difficult times, or whether sales continue to decline.</p>
<p>This report was originally featured in the January issue of Facts, Figures &amp; the Future, a monthly e-publication focused on delivering the latest consumer data and trend information to members of the Food Marketing Institute and clients of Nielsen. Facts, Figures &amp; the Future is published by The Lempert Report/Consumer Insight, Inc. and is sponsored by the Food Marketing Institute and Nielsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/chocolate-candy-sales-start-to-melt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100 Calorie Snack Packs Show Mixed Performance</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/100-calorie-snack-packs-show-mixed-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/100-calorie-snack-packs-show-mixed-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dieting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Lempert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve all gone to the grocery store and seen them: the boxes of cookies, crackers and other snacks that offer small packs of our favorite treats that limit calorie intake to 100 calories. Given the amount of shelf space these products take up, it would be a fair assumption that these items generate a fair amount of sales.  But the fact is that these products comprise a fairly small share of the huge, multi-billion dollar snack category. And with a high cost-per-ounce, the price premium for these products may be ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chips.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7730" title="Pile of potato chips" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chips-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="108" height="108" /></a>We&#8217;ve all gone to the grocery store and seen them: the boxes of cookies, crackers and other snacks that offer small packs of our favorite treats that limit calorie intake to 100 calories. Given the amount of shelf space these products take up, it would be a fair assumption that these items generate a fair amount of sales.  But the fact is that these products comprise a fairly small share of the huge, multi-billion dollar snack category. And with a high cost-per-ounce, the price premium for these products may be less appealing in tight times.</p>
<p>Limited-portion snacks accounted for only $74 million of the $11.3 billion snacks business.  According to Nielsen, food, drug and mass merchandiser stores (excluding Walmart) over the past five years mostly show that this category&#8217;s share accounts for 2 percent or less of sales. </p>
<p>Despite being a relatively miniscule part of overall snack sales, some types of limited-portion packs showed growth in 2008.  Potato chips and tortilla chips grew by 62.1 percent and 10.2 percent, respectively.  That impressive growth, however, generated sales of only $17.2 million and $12.2 million.</p>
<p>Sales of limited portion cookies and crackers lost steam in 2008, down 6.8 percent and 25.6 percent, respectively, even though both categories showed modest overall growth.</p>
<p>This information was published in the January issue of Facts, Figures &amp; the Future, a monthly e-publication focused on delivering the latest consumer data and trend information to members of the Food Marketing Institute and clients of Nielsen. Facts, Figures &amp; the Future is published by The Lempert Report/Consumer Insight, Inc. and is sponsored by the Food Marketing Institute and Nielsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/100-calorie-snack-packs-show-mixed-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Supermarket Guru&#8221; Phil Lempert&#8217;s 2009 Retail Outlook</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/supermarket-guru-phil-lemperts-2009-retail-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/supermarket-guru-phil-lemperts-2009-retail-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Lempert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supermarket Guru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermarkets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the economy worsened in 2008, U.S. consumers cut discretionary spending &#8212; and shifted basic purchases to value-oriented brands and retailers.  Dollar stores and private label brands saw gains &#8212; but many other retailers and manufacturers suffered through dramatic declines.
Is the outlook any brighter for the new year?  Food marketing expert Phil Lempert, of SupermarketGuru.com, offers his take on what consumers and retailers can expect in 2009.
Nielsen Wire: How did consumer habits change in 2008 &#8212; and how should retailers adjust?
Phil Lempert:
In 2008 shoppers used more coupons, bought more store ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>As the economy worsened in 2008, U.S. consumers cut discretionary spending &#8212; and shifted basic purchases to value-oriented brands and retailers.  Dollar stores and private label brands </em><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-retail-update-in-octnov-shopping-trip-declines-deepen-private-label-gains-continue/" target="_blank"><em>saw gains</em></a><em> &#8212; but many other retailers and manufacturers suffered through dramatic declines.</em></p>
<p><em>Is the outlook any brighter for the new year?  Food marketing expert Phil Lempert, of <a href="http://www.supermarketguru.com" target="_blank">SupermarketGuru.com</a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/phil-lempert_photo.gif"></a>, offers his take on what consumers and retailers can expect in 2009.</em></p>
<p><strong>Nielsen Wire: How did consumer habits change in 2008 &#8212; and how should retailers adjust?</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/phil-lempert_photo1.gif"></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/phil-lempert_photo_final.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6677" title="phil-lempert_photo_final" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/phil-lempert_photo_final.gif" alt="" width="102" height="162" /></a>Phil Lempert:<br />
</strong>In 2008 shoppers used more coupons, bought more store brands, and started using shopping lists again. I have little doubt that these &#8220;learnings&#8221; will stay with many of these shoppers through their lifetimes &#8212; the same way our grandparents who lived through the depression held on to many of the values learned through that experience. At the same time, shoppers have become smarter – they are reading more labels and asking more questions. They are also demanding better service and the chance to be heard, which is a new challenge for retailers who are trying to hold down payroll costs.</p>
<p>In a recent consumer survey we conducted for Readers Digest Entertaining Group, 72% of shoppers said that they will continue to use the shopping strategies they’ve discovered over the past six months even when the economy recovers. The rules have changed, and more than ever the consumer is the commander of the shopping experience.</p>
<p>My recommendation to retailers and manufacturers is to strengthen your relationship with your current customers and to reach out to new ones. People are nervous and looking for stability and accountability &#8212; those who offer both will win.</p>
<p><span id="more-6662"></span></p>
<p><strong>Nielsen Wire: How else are retail grocery stores adjusting to the struggling economy?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Phil Lempert:<br />
</strong>With higher costs and lower available capital, many retailers will be struggling to keep their operations at an acceptable level (acceptable to both their shoppers and themselves). At the same time, many stores are in need of new technology at the front end in order to comply with the new extended bar code, as well as preparing for RFID compatibility.</p>
<p>The move to build smaller stores (10,000 &#8211; 15,000 square feet) &#8211; led by Walmart and Tesco &#8211; may be one solution. Significantly reduced overhead and employee costs allow this format to be profitable with much smaller volume (and may well prove to be exactly the format aging baby boomers, in particular, are looking for). The concept of having one superstore in a community, with dozens of satellite stores dotting neighborhoods will be tested over the next year, and I suspect it will be the winning formula in many locales.</p>
<p><strong>Nielsen Wire: Other than prices, what factors will affect consumer choices in grocery aisles in 2009?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Phil Lempert:<br />
</strong>In the same Reader’s Digest survey I mentioned earlier, 76% of people said they were bored with the foods they were eating and wanted more new products and recipes. Look for the winners in all categories to be those national brands that innovate (think Healthy Choice&#8217;s steamer line of frozen foods) or bring in new flavors (Budweiser Chelada) to satisfy convenience and flavor, while staying within the constraints of our new value equation.</p>
<p>Clearly, there has been a shift towards &#8220;local.&#8221; People want to know where their products come from &#8212; especially imports. Now, consumers expect packaged goods to identify their source, much as bottled water has done for decades. Hunt&#8217;s canned tomatoes, which are grown and packed in California, and ice creams that contain blueberries from Maine are just two examples of the transparency that will become increasingly common in grocery stores. Marketing the source, quality, and taste of ingredients will become the advertising sweet spot in 2009.</p>
<p><strong>Nielsen Wire: How have advertising and marketing strategies changed for grocers in this economy?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Phil Lempert:<br />
</strong>The old ad model does not deliver the sales or influence that it once did, which is why brands and retailers have moved on to new media that are less costly, faster, more targeted to produce, and instantly measurable. The medium is certainly the message these days, and the old mode ad vehicle simply doesn’t appeal to future consumers. Advertisers must think more holistically about their advertising &#8212; and forget the idea that buying time on the Super Bowl and producing a lavish commercial that is designed to appeal to all is little more than fodder for an episode of <em>Mad Men</em>.</p>
<p>I just had the opportunity to be a judge in the National Grocers Association Creative Choice Awards, and while I can’t reveal any of the winners until they are announced at their awards ceremony in February, I can tell you that independent grocers, with limited budgets in most cases, are doing some of the most creative and effective advertising during this economic downturn.</p>
<p><strong>Nielsen Wire: But can’t chain stores just point to their prices, which are often better than smaller independent stores?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Phil Lempert:<br />
</strong>Ads that only promote price may give a short term bump in sales, but the truth is that advertising that builds a relationship based on what a product or brand stands for and the benefits it offers the customer is more effective in building life-long value. </p>
<p>My recommendation to chain retailers, in particular, is to examine what smaller grocers are doing with their ad budgets and websites. They may be shocked to find that these less glitzy and more personal ads are stealing their shoppers.</p>
<p><strong><br />
<em>About Phil Lempert<br />
</em></strong><em>Known as </em><a href="http://www.supermarketguru.com/" target="_blank"><em>&#8220;The Supermarket Guru,&#8221;</em></a><em> Phil Lempert is one of America&#8217;s leading consumer trend-watchers and analysts.  Lempert is the food trends editor and correspondent for NBC News&#8217; Today show, where he reports on consumer trends, food safety, and money-saving tips. He is also a monthly columnist for</em> Progressive Grocer <em>magazine and</em> Gourmet Retailer <em>magazine, and is the host of the weekly new products webcast &#8220;<a href="http://www.ratefoods.com" target="_blank">5 New Food Products in 5 Minutes: The Hits &amp; Misses.&#8221;</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/supermarket-guru-phil-lemperts-2009-retail-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
