<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; packaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/packaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>10 Tips for Defending Your Brand from Private Label</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/10-tips-for-defending-your-brand-from-private-label/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/10-tips-for-defending-your-brand-from-private-label/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health and wellness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private label brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[store brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tom Pirovano, Director, Industry Insights

Health Claims &#8211; &#8220;Now with More Calcium&#8221;, &#8220;Good Source of Antioxidants&#8221;, &#8220;Natural&#8221;, &#8220;Made with Real Sugar&#8221;.  First look for claims you can make without reformulations.  Then consider adding nutrients to add perceived value. 
Unique Packaging &#8211; Consider Dean Milk Chugs in a category dominated by private label.  Older shoppers may appreciate packaging that easier to open, easier to re-seal, and easier to read without glasses.
Line Extensions &#8211; Look at the soda category with only 6.1% private label share.  Every year we see many new soda flavors, but ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong> Tom Pirovano, Director, Industry Insights</strong></em></p>
<ol type="1">
<li><strong>Health Claims</strong> &#8211; &#8220;Now with More Calcium&#8221;, &#8220;Good Source of Antioxidants&#8221;, &#8220;Natural&#8221;, &#8220;Made with Real Sugar&#8221;.  First look for claims you can make without reformulations.  Then consider adding nutrients to add perceived value. </li>
<li><strong>Unique Packaging</strong> &#8211; Consider Dean Milk Chugs in a category dominated by private label.  Older shoppers may appreciate packaging that easier to open, easier to re-seal, and easier to read without glasses.</li>
<li><strong>Line Extensions</strong> &#8211; Look at the soda category with only 6.1% private label share.  Every year we see many new soda flavors, but very few really &#8220;new&#8221; brands.   In most stores, private label is left with limited SKUs and shelf space.</li>
<li><strong>Promote a Cause</strong> &#8211; Don&#8217;t just offer a percent your profits.  Build awareness.  Educate the consumer about a cause you can really embrace.  Let them know how they can get involved.   </li>
<li><strong>Odd Ounces</strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s easy for store brands to copy products sold with the same package size year after year.  Shifting a 12 oz. package to 15 oz. makes it difficult to compare prices to store brands.  Going metric makes the price comparison even harder.</li>
<li><strong>Offer Your Own Value Brand</strong> &#8211; Look at the hair care category with only 2.2% private label share.  National value brands make it difficult for store brands to get a foothold.   </li>
<li><strong>Local Ties</strong> &#8211; Each year have your sales force apply labels to packages in the store, reminding shoppers when a product is grown locally, processed locally, or warehoused locally.  In today&#8217;s environment, shoppers are likely to support the local economy.</li>
<li><strong>Differentiate Yourself</strong> &#8211; Compete with private label like you compete with any other brand.  Set your brand apart with a clear case for why it&#8217;s worth more than the store brand.</li>
<li><strong>&#8220;Green&#8221; Sizes </strong>- We used to call them &#8220;value sizes&#8221; or &#8220;club packs&#8221;.  Most large pack sizes use less packaging by nature.  Combine the value message with the green message.  Give shoppers a way to help the planet while saving money.</li>
<li><strong>Keep Innovating</strong> &#8211; Be a moving target.  Make your brand difficult to copy.  Give shoppers a reason to spend a little more on your brand.  Whether it&#8217;s packaging, labeling, health claims, or new flavors, use your brand equity and category expertise to push the category forward.</li>
</ol>
<p>For the flip side&#8230; check out <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/may_2009/five_ways_to_build">Five Ways To Build Store Brands</a> in the latest issue of <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/may_2009">Consumer Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/10-tips-for-defending-your-brand-from-private-label/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Consumers Prefer &#8220;Economy Size&#8221; To &#8220;Downsized&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-consumers-prefer-economy-size-to-downsized/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-consumers-prefer-economy-size-to-downsized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer packaged goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downsizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raw materials costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than half of U.S. consumers (58%) are &#8220;very concerned&#8221; about rising food prices, according to a survey of more than 48,000 households conducted by Nielsen in October.
So are consumer packaged goods (CPG) manufacturers and retailers, who have struggled in recent months to balance consumer demand for low prices and high value with abnormally high raw materials and transportation costs.
Rather than raising prices, some food manufacturers have reduced the size of their products.  Such strategies may minimize sticker shock at the grocery store, but are unpopular with U.S. consumers.
Instead, according ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/consumer_reading_label.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5886" title="consumer_reading_label" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/consumer_reading_label-194x300.jpg" alt="" width="97" height="150" /></a>More than half of U.S. consumers (58%) are &#8220;very concerned&#8221; about rising food prices, according to a survey of more than 48,000 households conducted by Nielsen in October.</p>
<p>So are consumer packaged goods (CPG) manufacturers and retailers, who have struggled in recent months to balance consumer demand for low prices and high value with abnormally high raw materials and transportation costs.</p>
<p>Rather than raising prices, some food manufacturers have reduced the size of their products.  Such strategies may minimize sticker shock at the grocery store, but are <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-food-manufacturers-less-for-more-strategy-backfires/" target="_blank">unpopular</a> with U.S. consumers.</p>
<p>Instead, according to Nielsen, nearly half (47%) of American consumers would prefer to buy large, economy-sized products with lower price points per serving.</p>
<p><span id="more-5884"></span></p>
<p>In comparison, only 17% of consumers surveyed by Nielsen said they would prefer CPG manufacturers to introduce new, smaller pack sizes at lower prices.  Another 9% suggested that CPG manufacturers downsize or modestly reduce the packaging size of products, keeping the price of the product the same. </p>
<p>&#8220;CPG manufacturers and retailers have few options to manage rising commodity costs beyond absorbing increased costs, passing on increases to consumers by raising prices, or covering increased costs by downsizing offerings,&#8221; Todd Hale, senior vice president, Consumer &amp; Shopper Insights, Nielsen, noted.  &#8220;Downsizing, in particular, is not a new option &#8212; we&#8217;ve seen downsizing over the last few years in a number of categories, including ice cream, cereal, candy bars, salty snacks, and paper products.&#8221;</p>
<p>View the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nielsen-food-packaging-1208.pdf">media alert</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-consumers-prefer-economy-size-to-downsized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

