<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; online buzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/online-buzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Giants vs Patriots: Playbook for the Social Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30845" title="SuperBowlBuzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz1.gif" alt="SuperBowlBuzz" width="575" height="1008" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png">(click for high resolution image)</a></p>
<h3>Patriots have more online visitors, but Giants fans run up web stats</h3>
<p>During the run up to the playoffs in December 2011, the Patriots had 644,000 unique visitors to their official website, topping the Giants’ 574,000 visitors. However, Giants fans were more engaged when visiting their team’s website, viewing nearly twice as many pages (17 page views per person) compared to Patriots visitors, and spending over 10 minutes each on average.</p>
<h3>Super Bowl buzz: Giants fans cheer more for team, Tom Brady is MVP of social media</h3>
<p>Fans’ excitement throughout the playoffs carried over to social media. The Giants had more buzz about their team each week, with a 59 percent share of buzz compared to the Patriots’ 41 percent of buzz volume on blogs, message boards/forums, public posts on Twitter and Facebook and online news posts.  But Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady surpassed Giants QB Eli Manning, with nearly double the amount of buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ringing in the Holidays, Consumers Call out iPhone 4S Most in Online Buzz</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-smartphones-by-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-smartphones-by-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NM Incite found that the iPhone has been the most frequently mentioned smartphone OS in terms of online buzz on blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter and Facebook, and online news posts, capturing 40 percent of online buzz about smartphones from July through December 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile phones continue to be much-discussed as we head into the holiday season—with iPhone leading the pack. <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, found that the iPhone 4S has been the most frequently mentioned smartphone in terms of online buzz on blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter and Facebook, and online news posts, capturing 40 percent of online buzz about smartphones from July through December 2011.  The iPhone 4S was introduced October 4.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30358" title="Top-smartphones-by-buzz-volume-2011" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Top-smartphones-by-buzz-volume-20111.png" alt="Top-smartphones-by-buzz-volume-2011" width="560" height="530" /></p>
<p>Combined with Apple’s other best-selling handsets, the iPhone 4 and iPhone 3GS, Apple phones accounted for nearly two-thirds of all mentions about smartphones between July through December 2011.  A handful of Android phones such as the Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Droid Bionic, and HTC Evo series phones attracted substantial buzz leading up to the holiday shopping season, accounting for nearly a quarter of buzz.</p>
<p>BlackBerry models took in 10 percent of the buzz, led by the BlackBerry Bold series which was the third-most mentioned handset with over 6 percent of online buzz about these top smartphones.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30359" title="Smartphone-buzz-volume-by-OS" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Smartphone-buzz-volume-by-OS1.png" alt="Smartphone-buzz-volume-by-OS" width="525" height="400" /></p>
<p>Methodology: Using a list of the top 20 recently acquired smartphone handsets during the 3rd quarter, as well as a handful of recently released handsets such the Samsung Galaxy Nexus and Apple’s iPhone 4S, Nielsen looked at online buzz mentioning these smartphones from July – December 2011 posted in blogs, message boards/groups, public posts on Twitter and Facebook, and online news sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-smartphones-by-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black Friday 2011 tops holiday weekend buzz, Cyber Monday set to follow record setting shopping season</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/black-friday-cyber-monday-2011-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/black-friday-cyber-monday-2011-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentimate analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an updated analysis of Black Friday/Cyber Monday buzz, NM Incite found that 2011 Black Friday Buzz has already more than doubled the total from 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of an ongoing analysis of consumer buzz about the holiday shopping season, <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a> looked at updated data and found that 2011 Black Friday buzz has already more than doubled in total compared to 2010.</p>
<p>As data has shown <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/black-friday-cyber-monday-buzz/">for prior years</a>, the majority of buzz was posted in the days leading up to the shopping holiday, with the peak occurring on the day of the shopping event itself.  In 2011 buzz about Black Friday/Cyber Monday peaked the day after Thanksgiving and made up 2.9 percent of all buzz that day, representing a 15 percent relative increase in the share of buzz compared to 2010.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-30257" title="2011 Black Friday buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/4115-NMIncite_black-friday-2011.gif" alt="Share of daily buzz about Black Friday and Cyber Monday" width="461" height="372" /></p>
<p>Cyber Monday buzz has also increased compared year-over-year, and is likely to climb further as discussion of Cyber Week sales continues throughout the week.  An interesting development this year comes from the increase in blog posts about Black Friday, which now accounts for 47 percent of all buzz mentioning it, led by the large volume of blog posts made weeks ahead of the shopping holiday.</p>
<p><strong>What are consumers saying about Black Friday/Cyber Monday?</strong></p>
<p>Looking more closely at what consumers are discussing about the shopping holiday through social media, NM Incite evaluated buzz about Black Friday/Cyber Monday to uncover popular topics.  An overwhelming majority of buzz was neutral in tone, indicating that consumers rely on social media platforms to share information related to deals and sales both online and off.  Another 94 percent of Cyber Monday posts were neutral in tone, with consumers sharing links to sales and deal-related news. Today&#8217;s findings reflect an <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/deal-with-it-discounts-drive-brand-love-on-social-media/">earlier study by NM Incite</a> which showed that receiving deals/discounts was one of the more popular reasons Americans use social media.</p>
<p>NM Incite also looked at the top 10 shared links on Twitter, and found many of the more popular links were also used to share information about Black Friday/Cyber Monday.  Posts from popular news sites ranked among the most shared links on Twitter , including a story from Mashable sharing the best Black Friday deals, as well as news coverage about the shopping holiday from CNN and ABC News.   The most shared links included pictures on Twitpic related to Black Friday as well. Tweets sharing deals rounded out the list of most shared links on Black Friday,  whereas links to deals topped the list for Cyber Monday buzz, making the deals instantly accessible on the shopping holiday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/black-friday-cyber-monday-2011-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black Friday Reigns Supreme, But Cyber Monday Sees Higher YOY Buzz Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/black-friday-cyber-monday-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/black-friday-cyber-monday-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As U.S. retailers ramp up for post-Thanksgiving holiday shopping, consumers increasingly turn online to search for the best deals and make plans for Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales. Since one of the top reasons for using social media is to receive deals and discounts, NM Incite, a joint Nielsen/McKinsey company, took a look at online buzz about Black Friday and Cyber Monday over the past two years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As U.S. retailers ramp up for post-Thanksgiving holiday shopping, consumers increasingly turn online to search for the best deals and make plans for Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales.  Since one of the top reasons for using social media is <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/deal-with-it-discounts-drive-brand-love-on-social-media/" target="_self">to receive deals</a> and discounts, <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, took a look at online buzz about Black Friday and Cyber Monday over the past two years.</p>
<p><strong>When do consumers buzz about Black Friday/Cyber Monday?</strong><br />
Perhaps not surprisingly, overall buzz for each shopping event peaks on the day of the sales, although the majority of buzz occurs in the days of November leading up to the events.  There was more total buzz about the holiday sales in 2010 compared to 2009, reflecting the growing amount of buzz overall posted on blogs, message boards/groups, news sites, as well as Twitter and Facebook.</p>
<p>The share of daily buzz mentioning these sales was also higher in 2010: discussion of Black Friday peaked at 2.5 percent of daily buzz in 2010 compared to 1.9 percent of buzz during Black Friday 2009, a relative increase of 25 percent in the share of total buzz.  In comparison, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/womens-world-cup-final-draws-13-5-million-viewers-in-us/" target="_self">buzz about the Women&#8217;s World Cup</a> represented a 1.1 percent share of total buzz, illustrating the significant level of discussion about Black Friday represents. Buzz about Cyber Monday 2010 grew the most, increasing their relative share of buzz by 75 percent compared to 2009.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-30107" title="Black Friday &amp; Cyber Monday buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/NMIncite_bf-cm-dailybuzz1.gif" alt="Share of daily buzz about Black Friday and Cyber Monday" width="461" height="372" /></p>
<p><strong>Black Friday vs. Cyber Monday</strong><br />
Looking more closely at buzz between the two shopping holidays, an overwhelming majority of buzz was about Black Friday, which made up more than four out of five messages about the events in 2009. Black Friday buzz made up 79 percent of buzz about these topics in 2010, while Cyber Monday buzz represented only 21 percent of discussion. However in 2010 the share of buzz about Cyber Monday more than doubled compared to 2009, led in part by the increase in discussion about Cyber Week sales in addition to growing interest in the online shopping events.</p>
<p><strong>Where do consumers talk about Black Friday/Cyber Monday?</strong><br />
As consumers try to share news about the latest sales, the majority of buzz about Black Friday and Cyber Monday comes from Twitter, where public posts made up 63 percent of buzz about these events.  The majority of tweets are published on the day of the events themselves.  Message Boards and Groups were also a popular venue for savvy shoppers to compare sales, representing 22 percent of online discussion about the shopping events.</p>
<p>Marketers trying to reach holiday shoppers ahead of time might also consider reaching out to bloggers; 2.1 percent of all blog posts in the week leading up mentioned Black Friday.  Blogs were twice as likely to discus Black Friday/Cyber Monday compared to buzz from other sources.  Posts on news sites also helped drive discussion, with 1.6 percent of posts on news sites mentioning Black Friday during the week of the shopping event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/black-friday-cyber-monday-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media and TV &#8211; Who&#8217;s Talking, When and What About?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-and-tv-whos-talking-when-and-what-about/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-and-tv-whos-talking-when-and-what-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media continues to influence how consumers interact with brands and share content every day. Increasingly, TV viewers leverage social media as a platform to talk about and engage with TV content.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media continues to influence how consumers interact with brands and share content every day. Increasingly, TV viewers leverage social media as a platform to talk about and engage with TV content. These conversations are not only opening new channels for consumer engagement with their favorite TV shows and fellow fans alike, but also are providing insight into which viewers are driving the conversations and when.  A recent analysis by <a href="http://www.nmincite.com" target="_blank">NM Incite</a> and Nielsen sheds light on which demographics are engaging with TV across social media and highlights some differences in composition between the general social media population and the population on social media sites talking about TV specifically.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Who Is Talking About TV?</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>General Online Population (%)</th>
<th>Social Media Population (%)</th>
<th>Population on Sites Talking About TV* (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Male</td>
<td>47%</td>
<td>45%</td>
<td>55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Female</td>
<td>53%</td>
<td>55%</td>
<td>45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">&lt; 18</td>
<td>16%</td>
<td>34%</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">18-24</td>
<td>9%</td>
<td>10%</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">25-34</td>
<td>16%</td>
<td>17%</td>
<td>29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">35-49</td>
<td>26%</td>
<td>27%</td>
<td>30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">50+</td>
<td>32%</td>
<td>31%</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hispanic</td>
<td>12%</td>
<td>12%</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Non-Hispanic</td>
<td>88%</td>
<td>88%</td>
<td>87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">White</td>
<td>78%</td>
<td>78%</td>
<td>76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Black or African American</td>
<td>11%</td>
<td>10%</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Asian or Pacific Islander</td>
<td>3%</td>
<td>3%</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Other</td>
<td>8%</td>
<td>8%</td>
<td>8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen and NM Incite<br />
Volumes represent the average March 2011 site visitor demographics for the top ten boards, blogs, groups, Twitter, and Video and Image sites discussing television in general.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The social media population overall, skews slightly higher among females (55%), than males (45%). However, when comparing this demographic split to that of the population on social media sites talking about TV, this split reverses skewing higher among males (55%), than females (45%). There are several interesting demographic shifts when comparing general social media users and the portion of the population talking about TV specifically on social media. Those under age 18 account for 34 percent of the overall social media population, yet make up only 12 percent of the population on social media sites talking about TV. The opposite shift happens when focusing on the 25 – 34 year-old demographic. This age break comprises 17 percent of the overall social media population, but jumps to 29 percent of the makeup of the population on sites talking about TV. Within these age groups it’s interesting to note that, the difference in percentages across ethnic backgrounds remains relatively unchanged for African Americans, Asian, Hispanic and Whites.</p>
<p><strong>When are consumers discussing TV?</strong><br />
TV buzz closely mimics traditional ratings patterns as well as a show’s yearly cycle.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tvbuzz-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29526" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tvbuzz-1.png" alt="When does TV Buzz Happen?" width="570" height="370" /></a></p>
<p>Buzz is highest on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday coinciding with days when a lot of major shows air. TV buzz drops off on the weekend and increases once again as the middle of the week approaches.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tvbuzz-21.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29528" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tvbuzz-21.png" alt="When does TV Buzz Happen?" width="570" height="380" /></a></p>
<p>Research shows that TV buzz nears its high during September, right before a show premieres and during its initial month. Conversations taper off slightly over the ensuing months, but increase again in January with the introduction of new and returning shows. TV buzz then seems to peak during April and May as consumers respond to show finales, and then dips again during the summer.</p>
<p><strong>What are consumers discussing?</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tvbuzz-3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29529" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tvbuzz-3.png" alt="What do viewers talk about?" width="570" height="410" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Consumers use social media to talk about a number of key TV-related topics such as winning (14%), voting (6%) and judging (6%), which highlight the appeal of and engagement consumers have with reality-based TV. Top genres fueling the most buzz are funny (10%), romance (8%) and drama (6%). Entertaining (11%), physical attractiveness (9%), fans (9%) and writers/creators (6%) round out the rest of top topics driving consumer discussion across social media.</p>
<p>For more on TV viewers getting social, download research and watch video from <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/adweek2011">Nielsen&#8217;s Advertising Week</a> presentations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-media-and-tv-whos-talking-when-and-what-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Relationship Between Social Media Buzz and TV Ratings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-relationship-between-social-media-buzz-and-tv-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-relationship-between-social-media-buzz-and-tv-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As television becomes more digital social media will continue to play an increasingly important role in how consumers discover and engage with various forms of content, including TV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Radha Subramanyam, SVP of Media Analytics</strong></em></p>
<p>People aren&#8217;t just consuming content on social networks, they&#8217;re actively sharing it.  As television becomes more digital &#8211; in the form of sharable video clips or articles about a show&#8217;s premiere, for example &#8211; social media will continue to play an increasingly important role in how consumers discover and engage with various forms of content, including TV.</p>
<p>An analysis conducted by NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey Company, and Nielsen looked at the correlation between online buzz and television ratings and found a statistically significant relationship throughout a TV show&#8217;s season among all age groups, with the strongest correlation among younger demos (people ages 12-17 and 18-34), and a slightly stronger overall correlation for women compared to men.  Men over 50 showed the weakest buzz-to-ratings connection leading up to a show&#8217;s premiere through the middle of the season, but that relationship strengthened by the finale as all age groups were actively discussing a TV show via social media.</p>
<p>Among  people aged 18-34, the most active social networkers, social media buzz is most  closely aligned with TV ratings for the premiere of a show.  A few weeks prior  to a show’s premiere, a nine percent increase in buzz volume correlates to a one  percent increase in ratings among this group.  As the middle of the season  approaches and then the finale, the correlation is slightly weaker, but still  significant, with a 14 percent increase in buzz corresponding to a one percent  increase in ratings.</p>
<p>At the genre level, 18-34 year-old females showed significant buzz-to-ratings relationships for reality programs (competition and non-competition), comedies and dramas, while men of the same age saw strong correlations for competition realities and dramas.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29290" title="buzz-impact-tv-ratings" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/buzz-impact-tv-ratings.gif" alt="buzz-impact-tv-ratings" width="575" height="450" /><br />
</em></span></p>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong></p>
<p>A model was created using 250 television programs and over 150 million social media sites to analyze the relationship between social media and television.  Several buzz- and television-related inputs went into this model.  Buzz metrics included buzz volume (the raw number of messages about a TV show), messages per source (as a proxy for spread of discussion) and the number of authors (total number of individuals generating the messages).  Fundamental television factors included the genre of the show, whether the program aired on broadcast or cable, and the length of time the show had been on-air (first season, second, etc.).  The amount of ad dollars  spent promoting the show and prior ratings (both episode and season) were also considered.</p>
<p>These variables directly impact both ratings and  buzz volume.  They were included in the model to account for  their contribution to understanding future TV ratings, and to bring clarity  to the value that buzz provides.</p>
<p>For more on TV viewers getting social, download research and watch video from <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/adweek2011">Nielsen&#8217;s Advertising Week</a> presentations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-relationship-between-social-media-buzz-and-tv-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Fans Generate Online Buzz in Run-up to the Football Season</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among NFL teams, the NY Jets generated the most online buzz during the off-season from blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter, Facebook, and online news posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As NFL fans gear up for the season ahead and prepare the rosters for their fantasy football teams, they head online for news and buzz about their favorite teams and players.</p>
<p>Among NFL teams, the NY Jets generated the most online buzz during the off-season from blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter, Facebook, and online news posts. &#8220;America&#8217;s Team,&#8221; the Dallas Cowboys continue to generate national interest in online discussions, although they were topped by their rivals, the Philadelphia Eagles, who led NFC teams and were second in overall pre-season buzz. The NY Giants, and their regional rival, the New England Patriots, round out the top five teams with the most pre-season buzz.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Pre-season buzz about NFL Teams</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>NFL Team</th>
<th>Share of Total NFL Team Buzz</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>New York Jets</td>
<td>11.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Philadelphia Eagles</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>New York Giants</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Dallas Cowboys</td>
<td>5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>New England Patriots</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Read as: The NY Jets had the most buzz among all NFL teams during the pre-season.<br />
Source: Nielsen, July 31 &#8211; August 6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>An abbreviated off-season due to the NFL lockout sparked a flurry of free-agent signings and trades of popular players, and generated considerable online buzz among sports fans.  Looking at players who have changed teams ahead of the 2011 season, Reggie Bush received the most buzz during the off-season with 194k mentions. Comparing buzz about NFL players who joined new teams through free-agency or trade in recent weeks, Plaxico Burress led this group of players with more than 13k mentions during the week of July 31 – August 6, followed by Reggie Bush, Nnamdi Asomugha, Chad Ochocinco, and Donovan McNabb.</p>
<p>One in four active web users in the US visited sites in the Sports category, which amounts to 42.5 million Americans during the most recent week (ending July 31).  Compared to weeks during the off-season, the NFL’s network of sites more than doubled their audience, a 258 percent increase in unique US visitors during the first full week after the NFL lockout ended.</p>
<table class="chart">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top Sports Sites During Week of July 31</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Website</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Yahoo! Sports</td>
<td>14,859</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>ESPN Digital Network</td>
<td>9,515</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>FOXSports.com on MSN</td>
<td>7,419</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>NFL Internet Network</td>
<td>4,923</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>MLB.com</td>
<td>4,906</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Read as: Yahoo! Sports had 14.9 million unique US visitors during the week ending July 31, about 8.9% of active web users during the week from Home/Work PCs and laptop computers.<br />
Source: Nielsen, July 25 &#8211; July 31, 2011</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As US sports fans go online for the latest news and stats, Yahoo&#8217;s network of sports sites was their top destination during the week of July 31. ESPN.com and FoxSports.com websites were also popular destinations for US sports fans in this most recent week. Historically the months of August and September are the busiest for sports sites, so this may provide another preview of the season to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grab a Mint Julep: Kentucky Derby Popularity on the Rise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/grab-a-mint-julep-kentucky-derby-popularity-on-the-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/grab-a-mint-julep-kentucky-derby-popularity-on-the-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horse racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Derby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether due to love of horse racing or mint juleps and big hats, the Kentucky Derby continues to grow in popularity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether due to love of horse racing or mint juleps and big hats, the Kentucky Derby continues to grow in popularity. New analysis by The Nielsen Company reveals that online buzz about the Kentucky Derby grew significantly from 2009 to 2010, and the Kentucky Derby remains the most buzzed about competition in the Triple Crown historically.  The Kentucky Derby has also seen steady TV viewership gains in U.S.; the race drew 16.5 million viewers in 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-27582  aligncenter" title="Triple Crown buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Triple-Crown-buzz1.png" alt="Online buzz about Triple Crown races, including the Kentucky Derby, in 2009-2010" width="444" height="370" /></p>
<p><strong>Derby takes the Crown</strong><br />
Comparing U.S. buzz about the Triple Crown races, Nielsen found that the Kentucky Derby had the most buzz in 2009 and 2010, and is off to an early lead in 2011.  Close behind the Derby’s buzz is the Belmont Stakes, which despite being the final race in the series makes up significantly more buzz than the Preakness Stakes.</p>
<p>The introduction of an official smartphone app for the Derby in 2010 might be behind the rise in buzz as the app makes it easier for fans and attendees to post buzz on Twitter and Facebook. This year, the Preakness is also introducing an app, which should keep the races competitive for their share of social media buzz.</p>
<p><strong>Bring your “Crown,” but leave your “Hats” at home</strong><br />
While the cultural accoutrements make the Derby a colorful event celebrated outside of Louisville, Ky., local traditions like the Derby Marathon and Churchill Downs are the most popular topics outside the race itself.  Overall, the majority of Derby buzz is about the race itself than about the personalities who attend the race each year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/grab-a-mint-julep-kentucky-derby-popularity-on-the-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American News Media Cover Royal Wedding More Frequently than UK Counterparts</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/royal-wedding-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/royal-wedding-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Wedding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to the Royal Wedding, U.S. media outlets have out-published the Brits, according to The Nielsen Company, which analyzed online buzz in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the Royal Wedding, U.S. media outlets have out-published the Brits, according to The Nielsen Company, which analyzed online buzz in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia following the announcement of the engagement of Prince William and Kate Middleton in November 2010. The study of buzz on social media (blogs, message boards/groups) and traditional media finds that while the United Kingdom creates the greater overall level of consumer buzz about the Royal Wedding, the United States has the highest share of news coverage by traditional news sources, such as the online versions of newspapers and magazines.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27414" title="Royal Wedding buzz from Traditional Media sources" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/3133_RoyalWeddingBuzzChart.jpg" alt="Royal Wedding coverage from Traditional Media sources" width="572" height="426" /></p>
<h2>U.S. News Media Take the Crown</h2>
<p>Since the couple&#8217;s November 2010 engagement, there have been thousands of news posts about the Royal Wedding and its participants by U.S. news outlets, accounting for more than .3% of all news coverage immediately following the engagement and a steady stream of articles since. This share of news coverage from traditional media sources is considerably higher than in the U.K. and Australia.  Given the varied number of news outlets, the share of news coverage is the best metric for comparison among the three markets; the share of news coverage by U.S. news outlets is more than twice that in the United Kingdom and Australia at the most recent measurement on April 3.</p>
<h2>Kate vs. Prince William</h2>
<p>Though Kate has received considerable interest online, Prince William continues to be the more popular subject of social media discussion in the United Kingdom, both by buzz volume and share of all buzz.  William is also mentioned more often in the United States and Australia.</p>
<p>Overall the U.K. makes up a larger share of buzz about the Royal Wedding and its participants, while the more populous U.S. market had a greater volume of buzz since the engagement was announced.</p>
<p><em>Note: For the purposes of this analysis, Social Media use is defined as buzz from blogs and message boards/groups. Traditional Media includes posts/updates from the online counterparts of print and broadcast news outlets, online news publishers, industry publications, and wire services.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/royal-wedding-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy.com Sees Large Traffic Increase Following Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/godaddy-com-sees-large-traffic-increase-following-super-bowl/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/godaddy-com-sees-large-traffic-increase-following-super-bowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web hosting site GoDaddy.com saw the largest lift in post-Super Bowl traffic, with a 41% increase in unique U.S. visitors during the week following the game compared to the week before.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisers involved in Super Bowl XLV, which saw the Green Bay Packers beat the Pittsburgh Steelers, were no doubt pleased with the news that the game was <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/">the most-watched U.S. telecast of all-time</a>. <span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif';">So did the large viewership have any impact on the number of visitors to their  websites?</span> Nielsen looked at web traffic for the week following the game and compared that to the week&#8217;s traffic leading up to it for a selection of advertisers who aired a TV commercial during the Super Bowl.  The selection of advertisers included all the pure-play online advertisers (e.g. GoDaddy.com) and any “traditional” advertiser (e.g. Volkswagen) whose commercial appeared among the 10 most watched during the telecast.</p>
<p>Of the sites reviewed, web hosting site GoDaddy.com saw the largest lift in post-Super Bowl traffic, with a 41 percent increase in unique U.S. visitors during the week following the game compared to the week before. GoDaddy aired two commercials during the game with their 1st quarter ad starring Joan Rivers as the new GoDaddy spokesperson ranking as the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/">ninth most-recalled commercial of the telecast</a>.</p>
<p>Volkswagen and travel site HomeAway.com were the other two telecast advertisers reviewed who saw double-digit gains in web traffic during the week of February 7, both having a 27 percent increase in unique U.S. visitors.  “Traditional” brand Mercedes-Benz also saw a noticeable uplift of 9 percent.</p>
<p>FOX, the Super Bowl XLV broadcaster, also saw traffic to its site increase by 11 percent to 1.5 million unique U.S. visitors during the week following the game compared to the week before.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-26540" title="Selection of Super Bowl Advertisers w/ Traffic Growth " src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/SuperbowlAdv-BAR-CHART.jpg" alt="Selection of Super Bowl Advertisers w/ Traffic Growth " width="356" height="440" /></p>
<p>On the other hand, when looking at online buzz, Groupon’s ads – a spoof on celebrity charity endorsements –caused plenty of conversation, placing the rookie Super Bowl telecast advertiser as the <a href="http://www.nmincite.com/?p=3444">#5 most buzzed about brand out of all Super Bowl advertisers</a>.  Among the pure-online players, Groupon took the top spot, capturing 10.5 percent of total Super Bowl marketing buzz the day after the game, three times the buzz of GoDaddy, which had the largest increase in web traffic.  Discussion of Groupon continued over the next few days as buzz volume for the advertiser grew as high as 34 percent during the week following the telecast.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-26543" title="Super Bowl XLV Advertiser Buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/SuperbowlAdv_chart3-BUZZ.jpg" alt="Super Bowl XLV Advertiser Buzz" width="575" height="563" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">Methodology: This piece of research covered all the pure-play online advertisers (e.g. GoDaddy.com) and any “traditional” advertiser (e.g. Chevrolet) whose commercial appeared amongst the 10 most-watched during the Super Bowl XLV telecast. The piece measured the number of unique U.S. individuals who visited the advertiser website from a home or work computer between January 31 and February 13.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">Buzz volume is depicted as a percentage of total Super Bowl marketing messages &#8211; any message with mentions of Super Bowl XLV and ad-related terms (e.g. advertiser, commercial, sponsor, campaign, marketer) &#8211; between January 31 and February 13. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/godaddy-com-sees-large-traffic-increase-following-super-bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

