<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; online audience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/online-audience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Update: Return of the Twitter Quitters</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/update-return-of-the-twitter-quitters/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/update-return-of-the-twitter-quitters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Martin, Vice President, Primary Research, Nielsen Online


Our recent post about how the majority of people who use Twitter wind up abandoning the service received a lot of great coverage and feedback. We also received a healthy amount of criticism from the Twitter community who were concerned that our study sold Twitter short because it failed to take into account applications and other websites that feed into the Twitter community.
So, as an update, we went beyond just Twitter.com, adding in more than 30 websites and applications that feed into the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>David Martin, Vice President, Primary Research, Nielsen Online</strong></em><strong><br />
</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YsQKcewSQEk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YsQKcewSQEk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Our <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/">recent post</a> about how the majority of people who use Twitter wind up abandoning the service received a lot of great coverage and feedback. We also received a healthy amount of criticism from the Twitter community who were concerned that our study sold Twitter short because it failed to take into account applications and other websites that feed into the Twitter community.</p>
<p>So, as an update, we went beyond just Twitter.com, adding in more than 30 websites and applications that feed into the Twitter community including: TweetDeck, TwitPic, Twitstat, Hootsuite, EasyTweets, Tumblr, and many others.</p>
<p>The results verified our initial findings: about 60 percent of people on Twitter end up abandoning the service after a month. The year-long retention curve looks very much the same as the one for just Twitter.com.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/twitter_retention.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11225" title="twitter_retention" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/twitter_retention.png" alt="" width="386" height="264" /></a></p>
<p>Clearly, this exercise illustrates the power, passion, and influence of the Twitter community. There is no question that this finding would not have spread as quickly as it did without the engaged and vocal user base that has adopted Twitter as a way of life.</p>
<p>Keep the feedback coming, no matter how you feel about this issue. We look forward to continuing to provide you with timely and engaging insights on this and other topics.</p>
<p><a href="To be fair, this exercise has also illustrated the power, passion, and influence of the Twitter community. There is no question that this finding would not have spread as quickly as it did without the engaged and vocal user base that has adopted Twitter as a way of life.     Thanks again for your feedback. Please keep it coming, no matter how you feel about this issue. We look forward to continuing to provide you with provocative insight and fueling the debate." target="_blank">twitter.com/nielsenwire/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/update-return-of-the-twitter-quitters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Quitters Post Roadblock to Long-Term Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOTE: See the important update to this story here.
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;
David Martin, Vice President, Primary Research, Nielsen Online

Oprah embarrassed herself on it with a stuck caps lock. That guy from Punk&#8217;d competed with &#8220;the most trusted name in news&#8221; for audience. A befuddled Jon Stewart shook his fist at it in anger. Let there be no doubt: Twitter has grown exponentially in the past few months with no small thanks to celebrity exposure. People are signing up in droves, and Twitter&#8217;s unique audience is up over 100 percent in March. But despite ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/twitter_icon.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-11097" title="twitter_icon" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/twitter_icon.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" /></a><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>NOTE</strong></span>: See the important update to this story <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/update-return-of-the-twitter-quitters/">here</a>.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>David Martin, Vice President, Primary Research, Nielsen Online<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Oprah embarrassed herself on it with a stuck caps lock. That guy from Punk&#8217;d competed with &#8220;the most trusted name in news&#8221; for audience. A befuddled Jon Stewart shook his fist at it in anger. Let there be no doubt: Twitter has grown exponentially in the past few months with no small thanks to celebrity exposure. People are signing up in droves, and Twitter&#8217;s unique audience is up over 100 percent in March. But despite the hockey-stick growth chart, Twitter faces an uphill battle in making sure these flocks of new users are enticed to return to the nest.</p>
<h3>Follow Vs. Follow-through</h3>
<p>Currently, more than 60 percent of U.S. Twitter users fail to return the following month, or in other words, Twitter&#8217;s audience retention rate, or the percentage of a given month&#8217;s users who come back the following month, is currently about 40 percent. For most of the past 12 months, pre-Oprah, Twitter has languished below 30 percent retention.</p>
<p>To understand why this poses a problem for Twitter, check out the chart below. By plotting the minimum retention rates for different Internet audience sizes, it is clear that a retention rate of 40 percent will limit a site&#8217;s growth to about a 10 percent reach figure. To be clear, a high retention rate doesn&#8217;t guarantee a massive audience, but it is a prerequisite. There simply aren&#8217;t enough new users to make up for defecting ones after a certain point.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/social_audience_retention.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11091" title="Audience Retention" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/social_audience_retention.png" alt="" width="440" height="349" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-11084"></span>Maybe we&#8217;re jumping the gun. Twitter is still something of a fledgling, and surely some other sites that eventually lived up to Twitter-like hype suffered from poor retention in the early days. Compare it to the two heavily-touted behemoths of social networking when they were just starting out. Doing so below, we found that even when Facebook and MySpace were emerging networks like Twitter is now, their retention rates were twice as high. When they went through their explosive growth phases, that retention only went up, and both sit at nearly 70 percent today.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/social_network_loyalty.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11092" title="social_network_loyalty" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/social_network_loyalty.png" alt="" width="440" height="332" /></a></p>
<p>Twitter has enjoyed a nice ride over the last few months, but it will not be able to sustain its meteoric rise without establishing a higher level of user loyalty. Frankly, if Oprah can&#8217;t accomplish that, I&#8217;m not sure who can.</p>
<p>Follow us: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/nielsenwire/">twitter.com/nielsenwire/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>155</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First &#8220;Online&#8221; Olympics Sets New Media Precedent</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/first-online-olympics-set-new-media-precedent/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/first-online-olympics-set-new-media-precedent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sina Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sohu Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tencent Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympic athletes broke 132 Olympics records and set 43 new world records during the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing.
Meanwhile, Olympics fans who logged on to the Internet to follow the events around the clock set a new online precedent during the Games,  Nielsen Online reported Wednesday.
Olympics Web Portals
In the U.S., NBC, an official broadcast partner for the event, drew an average of 18 million (week one) to 18.9 million unique visitors (week two) to its Olympics website during the Games.
Yahoo&#8217;s Olympics section drove more traffic than NBC&#8217;s site, but visitors to NBCOlympics.com ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympic athletes broke 132 Olympics records and set 43 new world records during the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Olympics fans who logged on to the Internet to follow the events around the clock set a new online precedent during the Games,  Nielsen Online <a href="http://www.netratings.com/downloads/Olympics_2008_Summary_090208.pdf" target="_blank">reported</a> Wednesday.</p>
<p><strong>Olympics Web Portals<br />
</strong>In the U.S., NBC, an official broadcast partner for the event, drew an average of 18 million (week one) to 18.9 million unique visitors (week two) to its Olympics website during the Games.</p>
<p>Yahoo&#8217;s Olympics section drove more traffic than NBC&#8217;s site, but visitors to NBCOlympics.com spent twice as much time on the site and looked at three times more content than visitors to Yahoo&#8217;s Olympics site, according to Nielsen.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Website</th>
<th>Unique Audience:<br />
Aug. 11-17<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Pages Per Person:<br />
Aug. 11-17</th>
<th>Minutes Per Person:<br />
Aug. 11-17</th>
<th>Unique Audience:<br />
Aug. 18-24<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Pages Per Person:<br />
Aug. 18-24</th>
<th>Minutes Per Person:<br />
Aug. 18-24</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo Olympics</td>
<td>18,057</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>8:41</td>
<td>18,974</td>
<td>8.4</td>
<td>9:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NBC Olympics</td>
<td>17,925</td>
<td>25.5</td>
<td>17:34</td>
<td>15,938</td>
<td>24.1</td>
<td>15:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Olympics</td>
<td>6,225</td>
<td>3.2</td>
<td>3:16</td>
<td>4,169</td>
<td>3.0</td>
<td>3:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="7">Source: The Nielsen Company, Custom Analysis (August 11 &#8211; August 24, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-916"></span>In China, approximately 85% of all Internet users who went online during the Games viewed Olympics content, according to ChinaRank, a website ranking platform hosted by the Internet Society of China and a Nielsen Online partner.</p>
<p>On average, 62 million unique browsers viewed Olympics content each day, and during the course of the Games, Chinese Internet users viewed more than 11.4 billion pages of content across 200 Olympics-related sites tracked by ChinaRank.</p>
<p>Sina Olympics was easily the most popular Olympics Web portal among Chinese Internet users, drawing an average of 30.9 million unique browsers each day.  Tencent Olympics (17.9 million average daily browsers) and Sohu Olympics (12.5 million average daily browers) were, respectively, the second- and third-ranked Chinese Olympics Web portals.</p>
<p><strong><br />
Online Video</strong><br />
NBC&#8217;s Olympics video site drew more than 1.2 million unique visitors per day, with dramatic traffic spikes around noon on work days.  Online video use was significant during the Beijing Games, but it did not appear to negatively affect TV viewing in the U.S., which remained at <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/beijing-olympics-most-viewed-event-in-american-television-history/" target="_blank">record levels</a> during the Games.</p>
<p><strong><br />
Olympics Buzz</strong><br />
U.S. swimmer Michael Phelps&#8217; dramatic gold-medal winning streak triggered a barrage blog chatter.  Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt also wowed Olympics fans, but Phelps, who received five times more online buzz than Bolt, proved unbeatable in the blogsphere.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Athlete</th>
<th>Sport</th>
<th>Country</th>
<th>Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Phelps</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Usain Bolt</td>
<td>Track &amp; Field</td>
<td>Jamaica</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shawn Johnson</td>
<td>Gymnastics</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nastia Liukin</td>
<td>Gymnastics</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kobe Bryant</td>
<td>Basketball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Roger Federer</td>
<td>Tennis</td>
<td>Switzerland</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LeBron James</td>
<td>Basketball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Lezak</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rafael Nadal</td>
<td>Tennis</td>
<td>Spain</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alain Bernard</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>France</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kerri Walsh</td>
<td>Beach Volleyball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ryan Lochte</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Abhinav Bindra</td>
<td>Shooting</td>
<td>India</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>He Kexin</td>
<td>Gymnastics</td>
<td>China</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Misty May-Treanor</td>
<td>Beach Volleyball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (August 8, 2008 &#8211; August 24, 2008)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Athletes are ranked by online buzz, with the top athlete indexed at 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Online Advertising</strong><br />
U.S. Olympics team sponsors drove 9.9 billion online ad impressions before and during the Beijing Games (August 4 &#8211; 24).  AT&amp;T, General Motors, and Bank of America were the top three advertisers, accounting for a combined total of more than 1 billion impressions.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Sponsor</th>
<th>Ad Impressions<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AT&amp;T Corporation</td>
<td>2,428,308</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General Motors</td>
<td>1,906,210</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bank of America</td>
<td>1,027,458</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nike</td>
<td>846,083</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General Electric</td>
<td>823,878</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>McDonald&#8217;s</td>
<td>718,692</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Johnson &amp; Johnson</td>
<td>382,295</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coca-Cola</td>
<td>375,055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Visa International</td>
<td>311,062</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hilton Hotels</td>
<td>309,222</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (August 4, 2008 &#8211; August 24, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View Nielsen&#8217;s complete Olympics online <a href="http://www.netratings.com/downloads/Olympics_2008_Summary_090208.pdf" target="_blank">findings</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/first-online-olympics-set-new-media-precedent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Web Brands Among U.S. Internet Users: July 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-july-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-july-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Yahoo! were again the number one- and number two-ranked Web brands in July, according to Nielsen Online.



Rank
Brand
Unique Audience


1
Google
123,161,000


2
Yahoo!
116,178,000


3
MSN/Windows Live
99,512,000


4
Microsoft
92,318,000


5
AOL Media Network
91,776,000


6
YouTube
74,809,000


7
Fox Interactive Media
70,103,000


8
eBay
56,111,000


9
Wikipedia
51,786,000


10
Apple
50,694,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (July 1 &#8211; 31, 2008)



View the full press release.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google and Yahoo! were again the number one- and number two-ranked Web brands in July, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/" target="_blank">Nielsen Online</a>.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Unique Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>123,161,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>116,178,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live</td>
<td>99,512,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>92,318,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>91,776,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>74,809,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>70,103,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>56,111,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>51,786,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>50,694,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (July 1 &#8211; 31, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/press_release10.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-july-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Web Brands Among U.S. Internet Users: June 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-june-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-june-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Yahoo! were the number one- and number two-ranked Web brands in June, according to Nielsen Online.



Rank
Brand
Unique Audience


1
Google
120,496,000


2
Yahoo!
113,187,000


3
MSN/Windows Live
99,747,000


4
Microsoft
93,786,000


5
AOL Media Network
91,167,000


6
YouTube
71,398,000


7
Fox Interactive Media
70,039,000


8
Wikipedia
52,747,000


9
eBay
52,509,000


10
Apple
49,911,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (June 1 &#8211; 30, 2008)



View the full press release.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google and Yahoo! were the number one- and number two-ranked Web brands in June, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/" target="_blank">Nielsen Online</a>.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Unique Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>120,496,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>113,187,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live</td>
<td>99,747,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>93,786,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>91,167,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>71,398,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>70,039,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>52,747,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>52,509,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>49,911,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 1 &#8211; 30, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://www.netratings.com/pr/pr_080714.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-june-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
