<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Olympics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/olympics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tops In 2008: Most Watched TV Sports Events</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tops-in-2008-most-watched-tv-sports-events/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tops-in-2008-most-watched-tv-sports-events/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFC Championship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFC Divisional Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFC Championship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFC Playoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tops In 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Rank
Program
Network
Match-Up
Viewers (P2+)


1
FOX SUPER BOWL XLII
FOX
NY GIANTS VS NEW ENGLAND
97,563,000


2
FOX NFC CHAMPIONSHIP
FOX
NY GIANTS AT GREEN BAY
54,005,000


3
AFC CHAMPIONSHIP ON CBS
CBS
SAN DIEGO AT NEW ENGLAND
44,850,000


4
FOX NFC PLAYOFF-SUN
FOX
NY GIANTS AT DALLAS
40,094,000


5
SUM OLYM TUE PRIME 1
NBC
 n/a
34,586,000


6
SUM OLYM SUN PRIME 1
NBC
 n/a
32,679,000


7
SUM OLYM SAT PRIME 2
NBC
 n/a
31,890,000


8
AFC DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF-SU
CBS
SAN DIEGO AT INDIANAPOLIS
31,598,000


9
AFC DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF-SA
CBS
JACKSONVILLE AT NEW ENGLAND
30,932,000


10
SUM OLYM MON PRIME 1
NBC
 n/a
30,579,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (2008).



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Match-Up</th>
<th>Viewers (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>FOX SUPER BOWL XLII</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>NY GIANTS VS NEW ENGLAND</td>
<td>97,563,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>FOX NFC CHAMPIONSHIP</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>NY GIANTS AT GREEN BAY</td>
<td>54,005,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>AFC CHAMPIONSHIP ON CBS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>SAN DIEGO AT NEW ENGLAND</td>
<td>44,850,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>FOX NFC PLAYOFF-SUN</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>NY GIANTS AT DALLAS</td>
<td>40,094,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>SUM OLYM TUE PRIME 1</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td> n/a</td>
<td>34,586,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>SUM OLYM SUN PRIME 1</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td> n/a</td>
<td>32,679,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>SUM OLYM SAT PRIME 2</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td> n/a</td>
<td>31,890,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>AFC DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF-SU</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>SAN DIEGO AT INDIANAPOLIS</td>
<td>31,598,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>AFC DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF-SA</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>JACKSONVILLE AT NEW ENGLAND</td>
<td>30,932,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SUM OLYM MON PRIME 1</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td> n/a</td>
<td>30,579,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/tops-in-2008-most-watched-tv-sports-events/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tops In 2008: Top TV Programs, Single Telecasts</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-top-tv-programs-single-telecasts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-top-tv-programs-single-telecasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloaded songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3 markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products placements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tops In 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen has issued a year-end look at the most popular trends among Americans during 2008, covering everything from the top TV programs to the most popular consumer packaged goods.
FOX&#8217;s &#8220;American Idol&#8221; was the top TV program of 2008, according to Nielsen.  Tuesday night broadcasts of &#8220;American Idol,&#8221; through December 7, drew 15.5% of U.S. TV households, on average, while Wednesday night &#8220;American Idol&#8221; broadcasts drew an average of 15.3% of all TV households.
Viewers with DVR access gave NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Heroes&#8221; the biggest bump any primetime program received in 2008.  The average ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Nielsen has issued a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nielsen-top-tens-2008-final9.pdf">year-end look</a> at the most popular trends among Americans during 2008, covering everything from the top TV programs to the most popular consumer packaged goods.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sports_tv3.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5763" title="sports_tv3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sports_tv3-193x300.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="150" /></a>FOX&#8217;s &#8220;American Idol&#8221; was the top TV program of 2008, according to Nielsen.  Tuesday night broadcasts of &#8220;American Idol,&#8221; through December 7, drew 15.5% of U.S. TV households, on average, while Wednesday night &#8220;American Idol&#8221; broadcasts drew an average of 15.3% of all TV households.</p>
<p>Viewers with DVR access gave NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Heroes&#8221; the biggest bump any primetime program received in 2008.  The average TV audience for &#8220;Heroes&#8221; increased by 35% when timeshifted viewing within seven days of a program&#8217;s original air date was factored into Nielsen&#8217;s ratings.  FOX&#8217;s &#8220;Fringe&#8221; and ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Lost&#8221; also drew large audience boosts &#8212; +26% and +25%, respectively &#8212; from DVR viewers.</p>
<p>The 2008 Superbowl, which drew 43.1% of all U.S. TV households, was the most popular single telecast of 2008. </p>
<p><span id="more-5758"></span></p>
<p><strong>Top 10 TV Programs &#8211; Regularly Scheduled</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>% of Homes In U.S.<br />
(Rating)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>AMERICAN IDOL-TUESDAY</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>15.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>15.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>DANCING WITH THE STARS</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>12.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>DANCING W/STARS RESULTS</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>MENTALIST, THE</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>10.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>NBC SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>10.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>CSI</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>8.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>NCIS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>8.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>60 MINUTES</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>7.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SURVIVOR: GABON</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>7.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (January 1 &#8211; December 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Note: Household Ratings include Live and Same Day timeshifted viewing. Data excludes telecasts under five minutes.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 TV Programs &#8211; Single Telecast</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Telecast</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Date Aired</th>
<th>% Of Homes<br />
In U.S.<br />
(Rating)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>FOX SUPER BOWL XLII</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>2/3/2008</td>
<td>43.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>FOX SUPER BOWL POST GAME</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>2/3/2008</td>
<td>30.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>FOX NFC CHAMPIONSHIP</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/20/2008</td>
<td>29.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>SUMMER OLYMPICS TUE PRIME 1</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>8/12/2008</td>
<td>20.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>FOX NFC PLAYOFF-PST-SUN</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/13/2008</td>
<td>18.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>SUMMER OLYMPICS OPEN CEREM</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>8/8/2008</td>
<td>18.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>ACADEMY AWARDS</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>2/24/2008</td>
<td>18.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>SUMMER OLYMPICS SUN PRIME 1</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>8/10/2008</td>
<td>18.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>AFC DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>1/12/2008</td>
<td>17.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SUMMER OLYMPICS THU PRIME 1</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>8/14/2008</td>
<td>17.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (January 1 &#8211; December 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Note: Household Ratings include Live and Same Day timeshifted viewing. Data excludes telecasts under five minutes.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 &#8220;Timeshifted&#8221; Primetime TV Programs</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>% Increase<br />
In Viewership</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>HEROES</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>FRINGE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LOST</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>BONES</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>GREY&#8217;S ANATOMY-THU 9PM</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>HOUSE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>SURVIVOR: GABON</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>AMERICAN IDOL-TUESDAY</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>MENTALIST, THE</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (January 1 &#8211; November 23, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Note: Percent Increase in viewership is based on absolute difference between Live Household Ratings and Live+7.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nielsen-top-tens-2008-final8.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Relive the greatest hits of 2008 &#8212; stay tuned on Nielsen Wire for more <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/tops-in-2008/" target="_blank">Tops In 2008</a> coverage.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Look ahead to the new year with Nielsen Wire&#8217;s </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/2009-outlook/" target="_blank"><strong>2009 Industry Outlook</strong></a><strong> series.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-top-tv-programs-single-telecasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China: Unprecedented Ad Spending Drop During Olympics</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/china-unprecedented-ad-spending-drop-during-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/china-unprecedented-ad-spending-drop-during-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[August 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics sponsors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=3860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympics sponsors and their competitors ramped up their August ad budgets to maximize their exposure during the month of the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
But according to Nielsen, many of China’s advertisers took a break from advertising in August, sending overall ad spending in China tumbling to levels last seen in May 2008, when the Sichuan earthquake hit and advertising was suspended for three days.
Advertising spending in China grew, year over year, by just 7% in August, Nielsen reported Monday.  In comparison, China&#8217;s ad spending grew by an average of 19% in the seven ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/china_map1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3861" title="china_map1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/china_map1-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>Olympics sponsors and their competitors ramped up their August ad budgets to maximize their exposure during the month of the 2008 Beijing Olympics.</p>
<p>But <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/press_release30.pdf">according to Nielsen</a>, many of China’s advertisers took a break from advertising in August, sending overall ad spending in China tumbling to levels last seen in May 2008, when the Sichuan earthquake hit and advertising was suspended for three days.</p>
<p>Advertising spending in China grew, year over year, by just 7% in August, Nielsen reported Monday.  In comparison, China&#8217;s ad spending grew by an average of 19% in the seven months leading up to the Olympic Games.</p>
<p>In August, sponsor advertising grew by 40% &#8212; or RMB2.8 billion (US$370 million) in China, but that increase was not enough to compensate for the withdrawal of the rest of the market&#8217;s advertisers.</p>
<p><span id="more-3860"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;This is quite unprecedented, based on our monitoring of advertising behavior and spending for previous Olympic Games.  Rather than attempt to battle it out with the Sponsors, other players opted simply to &#8217;sit out&#8217; the month of August,&#8221; Richard Basil-Jones, Managing Director, Media Asia Pacific, Nielsen, noted.  &#8220;With the London Games four years out, time will tell whether this was a situation unique to China, or whether in the future, other non-Sponsors will chose to sit on the side lines, leaving the Games open and clear for Sponsors to enjoy maximum cut through in an unusually uncluttered advertising environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Despite the ongoing global financial turmoil, advertisers returned to China&#8217;s ad market after the Olympic Games.  In September, ad spending in China registered healthy, near pre-Games growth of 16%, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/press_release29.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f4a7ef5e-a946-11dd-a19a-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1">Financial Times</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/china-unprecedented-ad-spending-drop-during-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Sports-Obsessed U.S. City: Columbus, OH</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-sports-obsessed-us-city-columbus-oh/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-sports-obsessed-us-city-columbus-oh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[major leagues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minor leagues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pitssburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarborough Sports Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columbus, OH is the number one sports town in the U.S., Scarborough Sports Marketing, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron, reported Wednesday.
Two-thirds (66%) of adults in Columbus reported being “very” interested in at least one of the 29 sports measured by Scarborough, including the major leagues, motor sports, college sports, minor leagues, and the Olympics, among others.
Boston (64%), Buffalo (63%), and Pittsburgh (63%) rounded out the top sports markets.

 
Nationally, 56% of all adults are avid sports fans, according to Scarborough.



Top 10 U.S. Sports Towns
% Avid Sports Fans


Columbus, OH
66%


Boston, MA
64%


Buffalo, NY
63%


Pittsburgh, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sports_fan.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1881" title="sports_fan" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sports_fan-193x300.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="150" /></a>Columbus, OH is the number one sports town in the U.S., Scarborough Sports Marketing, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron, reported Wednesday.</p>
<p>Two-thirds (66%) of adults in Columbus reported being “very” interested in at least one of the 29 sports measured by Scarborough, including the major leagues, motor sports, college sports, minor leagues, and the Olympics, among others.</p>
<p>Boston (64%), Buffalo (63%), and Pittsburgh (63%) rounded out the top sports markets.</p>
<p><span id="more-1880"></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Nationally, 56% of all adults are avid sports fans, according to Scarborough.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 10 U.S. Sports Towns</th>
<th>% Avid Sports Fans</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Columbus, OH</td>
<td>66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Boston, MA</td>
<td>64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Buffalo, NY</td>
<td>63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Pittsburgh, PA</td>
<td>63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Green Bay/Appleton, WI</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Providence/New Bedford, RI</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Denver, CO</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Rochester, NY</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Louisville, KY</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cleveland/Akron, OH</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">San Antonio, TX</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Birmingham, AL</td>
<td>62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spokane, WA</td>
<td>61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Dayton, OH</td>
<td>61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Jacksonville, FL</td>
<td>61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Indianapolis, IN</td>
<td>61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Albany/Schenectady/Troy, NY</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Oklahoma City, OK</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Lexington, KY</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Toledo, OH</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Colorado Springs/Pueblo, CO</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Mobile/Pensacola, FL</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Detroit, MI</td>
<td>60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Dallas/Fort Worth, TX</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Greensboro/High Point/Winston-Salem, NC</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Norfolk/Portsmouth/Newport News, VA</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Minneapolis/St. Paul, MI</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Washington, D.C.</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Des Moines/Ames, IA</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tampa/St.Petersburg, FL</td>
<td>58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tulsa, OK</td>
<td>58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Philadelphia, PA</td>
<td>58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Charlotte, NC</td>
<td>58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Milwaukee, WI</td>
<td>58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Las Vegas, NV</td>
<td>58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Seattle/Tacoma, WA</td>
<td>58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Albuquerque/Santa Fe, NM</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hartford/New Haven, CT</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Chicago, IL</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Salt Lake City, UT</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">New Orleans, LA</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Baltimore, MD</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Knoxville, TN</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cincinnati, OH</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Nashville, TN</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Kansas City, MO</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Richmond/Petersburg, VA</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Greenville/Spartanburg/Asheville/Anderson, SC</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>NATIONAL AVERAGE</strong></td>
<td><strong>56%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: Scarborough Sports Marketing (2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://www.scarborough.com/press_releases/Sports%20towns%20FINAL%2010.1.08.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-sports-obsessed-us-city-columbus-oh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tourism In China Gets An Olympic Boost</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tourism-in-china-gets-an-olympic-boost/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tourism-in-china-gets-an-olympic-boost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainland China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visit China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tourism to China is expected to surge, following the Beijing Summer Games.
According to a 16-market survey conducted by Nielsen after the Olympics&#8217; opening and closing ceremonies, consumers throughout the world are increasingly interested in traveling to mainland China. 
Forty-five percent of those surveyed after the Opening ceremony said they intended to travel to mainland China at some point.  Following the Closing Ceremony, that percentage increased to 51%.  For 80% of the respondents, who had never visited mainland China, it would their first trip to the country.
Meanwhile, respondents who said they had ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/china_map.jpg"></a>Tourism to China is expected to surge, following the Beijing Summer Games.</p>
<p>According to a 16-market survey conducted by Nielsen after the Olympics&#8217; opening and closing ceremonies, consumers throughout the world are increasingly interested in traveling to mainland China. </p>
<p>Forty-five percent of those <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/intend-to-visit-china_graph.pdf">surveyed</a> after the Opening ceremony said they intended to travel to mainland China at some point.  Following the Closing Ceremony, that percentage increased to 51%.  For 80% of the respondents, who had never visited mainland China, it would their first trip to the country.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, respondents who said they had no interest in visiting mainland China dropped from one-third, after the Opening Ceremony, to one-quarter, following the Closing Ceremony. </p>
<p><span id="more-1245"></span></p>
<p>Interest in visiting mainland China was <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/countrybreakdown.pdf">highest</a> in neighboring Hong Kong (86%), Singapore (86%), and India (80%).  Large percentages of repondents in Mexico (72%), Taiwan (69%), South Africa (69%) and South Korea (66%) also expressed desire to travel to China.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/beijing-rated-a-winner-by-olympics-viewers/" target="_blank">Positive impressions</a> of China, generated by global Olympics TV coverage, may account for the surging interest in travel to the country, Grace Pan, head of leisure and travel research, Nielsen China, noted. </p>
<p>&#8220;According to the World Tourism Organization, China will be the world’s largest tourist destination by 2020 receiving 137 million overseas tourists in 2020, and in the meantime and generating 100 million outbound tourists of their own,&#8221; Pan said.  &#8220;With the Beijing Olympics generating such strong interest in China, they may well reach these numbers earlier than anticipated.&#8221;</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/olympic-china-visit-intention.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read China Daily&#8217;s <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2008-09/13/content_7025065.htm" target="_blank">coverage</a> of Nielsen&#8217;s findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tourism-in-china-gets-an-olympic-boost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beijing Rated A &#8220;Winner&#8221; By Olympics Viewers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/beijing-rated-a-winner-by-olympics-viewers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/beijing-rated-a-winner-by-olympics-viewers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv viewers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the many winners at the recent Summer Olympic Games: the city of Beijing.
According to a survey conducted by Nielsen after the closing ceremony, seven in 10 viewers across 16 countries and territories said Beijing appeared more &#8220;modern&#8221; and &#8220;high-tech&#8221; than they had expected.
Beijing also looked cleaner and greener than many viewers expected &#8212; 56% said the city&#8217;s physical environment exceeded their expectations.
Nine in 10 foreigners who visited Beijing for the Olympics also told Nielsen the city&#8217;s Olympics venues were &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;very good.&#8221;
View the full press release.
Read The Wall ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the many winners at the recent Summer Olympic Games: the city of Beijing.</p>
<p>According to a survey conducted by Nielsen after the closing ceremony, seven in 10 viewers across 16 countries and territories said Beijing appeared more &#8220;modern&#8221; and &#8220;high-tech&#8221; than they had expected.</p>
<p>Beijing also looked cleaner and greener than many viewers expected &#8212; 56% said the city&#8217;s physical environment exceeded their expectations.</p>
<p>Nine in 10 foreigners who visited Beijing for the Olympics also told Nielsen the city&#8217;s Olympics venues were &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;very good.&#8221;</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/press_release4.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/chinajournal/2008/09/05/after-the-games-china-looks-high-tech/?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">coverage</a> of Nielsen&#8217;s findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/beijing-rated-a-winner-by-olympics-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beijing Olympics Draw Largest Ever Global TV Audience</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/beijing-olympics-draw-largest-ever-global-tv-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/beijing-olympics-draw-largest-ever-global-tv-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. viewers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official: the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games attracted the largest global TV audience ever. 
Between August 8 and August 24, 4.7 billion viewers &#8212; or 70% of the world&#8217;s population &#8212; tuned in to watch the Games, according to Nielsen.  In comparison, 3.9 billion watched the 2004 Athens Games, while 3.6 billion followed the 2000 Sydney Games on TV. 
Host nation China led the viewing with 94% of Chinese viewers tuning in to the Olympics TV coverage, Nielsen reported.  South Korea, though a much less populous nation, also recorded 94% audience reach.  Mexico followed closely with ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official: the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games attracted the largest global TV audience ever. </p>
<p>Between August 8 and August 24, 4.7 billion viewers &#8212; or 70% of the world&#8217;s population &#8212; tuned in to watch the Games, according to Nielsen.  In comparison, 3.9 billion watched the 2004 Athens Games, while 3.6 billion followed the 2000 Sydney Games on TV. </p>
<p>Host nation China led the viewing with 94% of Chinese viewers tuning in to the Olympics TV coverage, Nielsen reported.  South Korea, though a much less populous nation, also recorded 94% audience reach.  Mexico followed closely with 93% of all viewers in that country following the Olympics on TV.</p>
<p>In the U.S., the Summer Games ranked as the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/beijing-olympics-most-viewed-event-in-american-television-history/" target="_blank">most-viewed</a> TV event ever, with a total audience of 211 million and an average daily audience of 27 million people.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/press_release3.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/world/news/e3i187b1de8cecc50d0e6d5c57d68cae32a" target="_blank">The Hollywood Reporter</a>, <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6593676.html?industryid=47203" target="_blank">Multichannel News</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/05/olympics-ratings-47-billi_n_124337.html" target="_blank">The Huffington Post</a>, and on <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=62553Q%3AUS&amp;sid=aT3QhOOTmtmQ" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/beijing-olympics-draw-largest-ever-global-tv-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First &#8220;Online&#8221; Olympics Sets New Media Precedent</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/first-online-olympics-set-new-media-precedent/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/first-online-olympics-set-new-media-precedent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sina Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sohu Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tencent Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympic athletes broke 132 Olympics records and set 43 new world records during the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing.
Meanwhile, Olympics fans who logged on to the Internet to follow the events around the clock set a new online precedent during the Games,  Nielsen Online reported Wednesday.
Olympics Web Portals
In the U.S., NBC, an official broadcast partner for the event, drew an average of 18 million (week one) to 18.9 million unique visitors (week two) to its Olympics website during the Games.
Yahoo&#8217;s Olympics section drove more traffic than NBC&#8217;s site, but visitors to NBCOlympics.com ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympic athletes broke 132 Olympics records and set 43 new world records during the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Olympics fans who logged on to the Internet to follow the events around the clock set a new online precedent during the Games,  Nielsen Online <a href="http://www.netratings.com/downloads/Olympics_2008_Summary_090208.pdf" target="_blank">reported</a> Wednesday.</p>
<p><strong>Olympics Web Portals<br />
</strong>In the U.S., NBC, an official broadcast partner for the event, drew an average of 18 million (week one) to 18.9 million unique visitors (week two) to its Olympics website during the Games.</p>
<p>Yahoo&#8217;s Olympics section drove more traffic than NBC&#8217;s site, but visitors to NBCOlympics.com spent twice as much time on the site and looked at three times more content than visitors to Yahoo&#8217;s Olympics site, according to Nielsen.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Website</th>
<th>Unique Audience:<br />
Aug. 11-17<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Pages Per Person:<br />
Aug. 11-17</th>
<th>Minutes Per Person:<br />
Aug. 11-17</th>
<th>Unique Audience:<br />
Aug. 18-24<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Pages Per Person:<br />
Aug. 18-24</th>
<th>Minutes Per Person:<br />
Aug. 18-24</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo Olympics</td>
<td>18,057</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>8:41</td>
<td>18,974</td>
<td>8.4</td>
<td>9:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NBC Olympics</td>
<td>17,925</td>
<td>25.5</td>
<td>17:34</td>
<td>15,938</td>
<td>24.1</td>
<td>15:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Olympics</td>
<td>6,225</td>
<td>3.2</td>
<td>3:16</td>
<td>4,169</td>
<td>3.0</td>
<td>3:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="7">Source: The Nielsen Company, Custom Analysis (August 11 &#8211; August 24, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-916"></span>In China, approximately 85% of all Internet users who went online during the Games viewed Olympics content, according to ChinaRank, a website ranking platform hosted by the Internet Society of China and a Nielsen Online partner.</p>
<p>On average, 62 million unique browsers viewed Olympics content each day, and during the course of the Games, Chinese Internet users viewed more than 11.4 billion pages of content across 200 Olympics-related sites tracked by ChinaRank.</p>
<p>Sina Olympics was easily the most popular Olympics Web portal among Chinese Internet users, drawing an average of 30.9 million unique browsers each day.  Tencent Olympics (17.9 million average daily browsers) and Sohu Olympics (12.5 million average daily browers) were, respectively, the second- and third-ranked Chinese Olympics Web portals.</p>
<p><strong><br />
Online Video</strong><br />
NBC&#8217;s Olympics video site drew more than 1.2 million unique visitors per day, with dramatic traffic spikes around noon on work days.  Online video use was significant during the Beijing Games, but it did not appear to negatively affect TV viewing in the U.S., which remained at <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/beijing-olympics-most-viewed-event-in-american-television-history/" target="_blank">record levels</a> during the Games.</p>
<p><strong><br />
Olympics Buzz</strong><br />
U.S. swimmer Michael Phelps&#8217; dramatic gold-medal winning streak triggered a barrage blog chatter.  Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt also wowed Olympics fans, but Phelps, who received five times more online buzz than Bolt, proved unbeatable in the blogsphere.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Athlete</th>
<th>Sport</th>
<th>Country</th>
<th>Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Phelps</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Usain Bolt</td>
<td>Track &amp; Field</td>
<td>Jamaica</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shawn Johnson</td>
<td>Gymnastics</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nastia Liukin</td>
<td>Gymnastics</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kobe Bryant</td>
<td>Basketball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Roger Federer</td>
<td>Tennis</td>
<td>Switzerland</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LeBron James</td>
<td>Basketball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Lezak</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rafael Nadal</td>
<td>Tennis</td>
<td>Spain</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alain Bernard</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>France</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kerri Walsh</td>
<td>Beach Volleyball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ryan Lochte</td>
<td>Swimming</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Abhinav Bindra</td>
<td>Shooting</td>
<td>India</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>He Kexin</td>
<td>Gymnastics</td>
<td>China</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Misty May-Treanor</td>
<td>Beach Volleyball</td>
<td>USA</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (August 8, 2008 &#8211; August 24, 2008)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Athletes are ranked by online buzz, with the top athlete indexed at 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Online Advertising</strong><br />
U.S. Olympics team sponsors drove 9.9 billion online ad impressions before and during the Beijing Games (August 4 &#8211; 24).  AT&amp;T, General Motors, and Bank of America were the top three advertisers, accounting for a combined total of more than 1 billion impressions.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Sponsor</th>
<th>Ad Impressions<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AT&amp;T Corporation</td>
<td>2,428,308</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General Motors</td>
<td>1,906,210</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bank of America</td>
<td>1,027,458</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nike</td>
<td>846,083</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General Electric</td>
<td>823,878</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>McDonald&#8217;s</td>
<td>718,692</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Johnson &amp; Johnson</td>
<td>382,295</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coca-Cola</td>
<td>375,055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Visa International</td>
<td>311,062</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hilton Hotels</td>
<td>309,222</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (August 4, 2008 &#8211; August 24, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View Nielsen&#8217;s complete Olympics online <a href="http://www.netratings.com/downloads/Olympics_2008_Summary_090208.pdf" target="_blank">findings</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/first-online-olympics-set-new-media-precedent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain&#8217;s Olympics TV Ads More Effective Than Obama&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mccains-olympics-tv-ads-more-effective-than-obamas/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mccains-olympics-tv-ads-more-effective-than-obamas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Hands That Built This Nation"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["It Begins With a Plan"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Washington's Broken"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senators McCain and Obama spent about the same on Olympics TV advertising &#8212; between $5 and $6 million, Adweek reported Monday.
But McCain got much more bang for his advertising bucks, according to an analysis by Nielsen IAG.
Nielsen&#8217;s survey of 1,600 likely general election voters who watched the Beijing Games found that McCain&#8217;s Olympic ads more effectively communicated a basic message, were recalled by more viewers, and triggered a larger intent-to-vote increase among viewers than ads run by Obama&#8217;s campaign. 
On average, the two McCain ads that were surveyed &#8212; &#8220;Celebrity&#8221; and &#8220;Washington&#8217;s ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-906" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button1-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Senators McCain and Obama spent about the same on Olympics TV advertising &#8212; between $5 and $6 million, <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/media/e3ib225d0cb90c027dde2ed4f72c2385ae5" target="_blank">Adweek</a> reported Monday.</p>
<p>But McCain got much more bang for his advertising bucks, according to an analysis by Nielsen IAG.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s survey of 1,600 likely general election voters who watched the Beijing Games found that McCain&#8217;s Olympic ads more effectively communicated a basic message, were recalled by more viewers, and triggered a larger intent-to-vote increase among viewers than ads run by Obama&#8217;s campaign. </p>
<p>On average, the two McCain ads that were surveyed &#8212; &#8220;Celebrity&#8221; and &#8220;Washington&#8217;s Broken&#8221; &#8211; were recalled by 52% of those polled.  In comparison, just 40% recalled Obama&#8217;s two ads, &#8220;Hands That Built This Nation&#8221; and &#8220;It Begins With a Plan.&#8221;</p>
<p>That huge lead in general recall translated into a 10% net boost in intent to vote for McCain, while Obama received only a 7% lift from his Olympics TV ads.</p>
<p>There was some good news for Obama &#8212; his Olympics ads were apparently &#8220;more likable&#8221; than McCain&#8217;s.  Forty-five percent of Nielsen respondents said they liked Obama&#8217;s Olympics ads, while just 33% said they liked McCain&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mccains-olympics-tv-ads-more-effective-than-obamas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primetime Broadcast Ratings: August 26, 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-august-26-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-august-26-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Univision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC’s “America&#8217;s Got Talent” claimed the top spot in Nielsen’s ranking of primetime broadcast TV programs for Tuesday, August 26, 2008.
The telecast drew an average audience of 11.1 million viewers, while CBS’s “NCIS” and FOX’s “House” were ranked second and third, respectively, with 7.5 million and 6.8 million average viewers each.
Coverage of the second night of the Democratic National Convention on NBC and ABC also made the top ten.



RANK
NAME
NETWORK
VIEWERS (P2+)


1
AMERICA&#8217;S GOT TALENT
NBC
11,118,000


2
NCIS
CBS
7,453,000


3
HOUSE
FOX
6,808,000


4
WIPEOUT
ABC
6,325,000


5
BIG BROTHER 10-TUE
CBS
6,284,000


6
DECISION &#8216;08 DEM CONV TUE(S)-08/26/2008
NBC
5,976,000


7
AL DIABLO CON GUAPOS TUE
UNI
5,317,000


8
FUEGO EN LA SANGRE TUE
UNI
5,218,000


9
HOUSE-TUE 8P
FOX
4,867,000


10
VOTE2008:DEM NAT CONV-TUE(S)-08/26/2008
ABC
4,758,000


Source: The ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC’s “America&#8217;s Got Talent” claimed the top spot in Nielsen’s ranking of primetime broadcast TV programs for Tuesday, August 26, 2008.</p>
<p>The telecast drew an average audience of 11.1 million viewers, while CBS’s “NCIS” and FOX’s “House” were ranked second and third, respectively, with 7.5 million and 6.8 million average viewers each.</p>
<p>Coverage of the second night of the Democratic National Convention on NBC and ABC also made the top ten.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>NAME</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>VIEWERS (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>AMERICA&#8217;S GOT TALENT</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>11,118,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>NCIS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>7,453,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>HOUSE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>6,808,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>WIPEOUT</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>6,325,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>BIG BROTHER 10-TUE</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>6,284,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>DECISION &#8216;08 DEM CONV TUE(S)-08/26/2008</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>5,976,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>AL DIABLO CON GUAPOS TUE</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>5,317,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE TUE</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>5,218,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>HOUSE-TUE 8P</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>4,867,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>VOTE2008:DEM NAT CONV-TUE(S)-08/26/2008</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>4,758,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (August 26, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall, NBC won the night with an average audience of just over 9.2 million viewers, while FOX took second place with 5.8 million average viewers.  CBS and ABC claimed third and fourth places &#8212; with just over 5.7 million and 5 million average viewers, respectively.  Univision followed in fifth place with an average audience of just over 4.7 million viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-august-26-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
