<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>President Obama &amp; State Emission Standards</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/president-obama-state-emission-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/president-obama-state-emission-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Enzweiler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Enzweiler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julie Enzweiler
On January 26, 2009 President Obama announced that emission standards could be decided at a state level.  This decision has spurred on an extremely heated debate online among all communities.

Forty-two percent are positive towards President Obama&#8217;s decision, predominately driven by the Environmental communities, while 44% are negative.

Consumers provide in-depth reasoning behind their belief on reversing the Bush administration&#8217;s emissions ruling; however, there is a significant amount of confusion on the number of potential emission standards the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM&#8217;s) would need to adhere to.  Most consumers ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Julie Enzweiler</strong></em></p>
<p>On January 26, 2009 President Obama announced that emission standards could be decided at a state level.  This decision has spurred on an extremely heated debate online among all communities.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-386" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/emission-1.jpg" alt="buzz about emission standards" width="477" height="300" /></p>
<p>Forty-two percent are positive towards President Obama&#8217;s decision, predominately driven by the Environmental communities, while 44% are negative.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-387" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/emission-2.jpg" alt="consumer sentiment on emission standards" width="492" height="327" /></p>
<p>Consumers provide in-depth reasoning behind their belief on reversing the Bush administration&#8217;s emissions ruling; however, there is a significant amount of confusion on the number of potential emission standards the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM&#8217;s) would need to adhere to.  Most consumers believe that 50 state standards would be possible, while a few believe the limit is two standards (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency">EPA</a> &amp; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CARB">CARB</a>).  The American people are seeking clarity on this topic either from the Obama administration, EPA or the OEM&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Below is a list of consumer positive and negative opinion on this topic:</p>
<p><strong>Positive</strong></p>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Promotes innovation</li>
<li>Creates jobs</li>
<li>Lowers fuel consumption</li>
<li>Reduces dependency on foreign      oil</li>
<li>Two (2) standards (EPA &amp; CARB)</li>
<li>Helps the environment (expands      lives, cleaner air, climate change)</li>
<li>Suggests OEM&#8217;s adhere to most      stringent requirements &amp; apply to all vehicles</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Negative</strong></p>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Hurts the economy even more</li>
<li>Kills the automotive industry</li>
<li>Additional taxpayer funding      needed</li>
<li>50 different state standards      possible</li>
<li>Pay significantly more for a      new vehicle</li>
<li>Produces cars consumers do not      want by forcing smaller vehicles on the market, when demand is for larger      vehicles</li>
<li>Limits vehicle selection</li>
<li>Lowers vehicle performance</li>
<li>Billions in R&amp;D for OEM&#8217;s</li>
<li>Too difficult at a state level      and needs to be at federal level</li>
<li>Logistical nightmare for all      (OEM, Dealer, State, Federal &amp; Owners)</li>
<li>More government regulations</li>
<li>Lack of electrical power      infrastructure</li>
<li>Obama paying back campaign      supporters</li>
</ul>
<p>This new direction from Washington will certainly add to the automakers&#8217; current economic strain. Consumers are already anticipating that Honda and Toyota will support this new initiative and push for innovation, while Ford, Chrysler and General Motors are expected to push back. It will be imperative for the Domestic OEM&#8217;s to respond to Washington and the public in a delicate manner as they are no longer just potential owners, but also key shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/president-obama-state-emission-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hockey Moms&#8221; Tune In For Prez, V.P. Debates</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/hockey-moms-tune-in-for-prez-vp-debates/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/hockey-moms-tune-in-for-prez-vp-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v.p. debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women 25-54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women viewers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; famously invoked by Gov. Sarah Palin in her V.P. campaign speeches &#8212; may also have a passion for politics.
According to a Nielsen analysis released Tuesday, &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; defined as women ages 25 to 54 who live in homes with children and who watched at least six minutes of the most recent Stanley Cup Finals on NBC &#8211; were more likely than average moms to watch the first two debates of the 2008 election.
Last Thursday, Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s V.P. debate drew 23.8% of all mothers (ages ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button6.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2133" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button6-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>&#8220;Hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; famously invoked by Gov. Sarah Palin in her V.P. campaign speeches &#8212; may also have a passion for politics.</p>
<p>According to a Nielsen analysis released Tuesday, &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; &#8212; defined as women ages 25 to 54 who live in homes with children and who watched at least six minutes of the most recent Stanley Cup Finals on NBC &#8211; were more likely than average moms to watch the first two debates of the 2008 election.</p>
<p>Last Thursday, Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s V.P. debate drew 23.8% of all mothers (ages 25 to 54), while 33% of those women defined as &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; tuned in.  Overall, &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; were 38.7% more likely than average moms to have watched the V.P. debate.</p>
<p>In comparison, the first debate between Senators McCain and Obama, on Sept. 26, drew 16.5% of all mothers (25 to 54).  Among those classified as &#8220;hockey moms,&#8221; however, 21.3% tuned in to the debate, making &#8220;hockey moms&#8221; 29.1% more likely than average moms to have watched the McCain and Obama&#8217;s debate.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in the <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/jobfind/news/media/view/2008_10_07_Hockey_moms_tuning_in_to_debates/srvc=home&amp;position=also" target="_blank">Boston Herald</a> and <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6602527.html" target="_blank">Broadcasting &amp; Cable</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/hockey-moms-tune-in-for-prez-vp-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highest Rated Presidential Debates: 1960 To Present</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-ten-presidential-debates-1960-to-present/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-ten-presidential-debates-1960-to-present/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dukakis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first televised presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mondale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the U.S. financial crisis hanging in the balance, the first debate between Barack Obama and John McCain &#8211; originally scheduled for Friday &#8212; has taken on unusual importance.  But, how will this first presidential duel of the 2008 election compare with the most-watched debates of the last half-century?
Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan&#8217;s October 28, 1980 debate claimed the largest television audience &#8212; 80.6 million viewers &#8212; since 1976, the first year that Nielsen collected TV viewership data for presidential debates. 
George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Ross Perot&#8217;s October 15, 1992 debate (69.9 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button12.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1559" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button12-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>With the U.S. financial crisis hanging in the balance, the first debate between Barack Obama and John McCain &#8211; originally scheduled for Friday &#8212; has taken on unusual importance.  But, how will this first presidential duel of the 2008 election compare with the most-watched debates of the last half-century?</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button14.jpg"></a>Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan&#8217;s October 28, 1980 debate claimed the largest television audience &#8212; 80.6 million viewers &#8212; since 1976, the first year that Nielsen collected TV viewership data for presidential debates. </p>
<p>George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Ross Perot&#8217;s October 15, 1992 debate (69.9 million viewers) and Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter&#8217;s September 23, 1976 debate (69.7 million viewers) round out the top three.</p>
<p>George H. W. Bush and Michael Dukakis&#8217;s 1988 debates and Ronald Reagan and Walter Mondale&#8217;s 1984 debates also made the top 10.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>YEAR</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>DATE</th>
<th>CANDIDATES</th>
<th>VIEWERS P2+<br />
(MILLIONS)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>1980</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 28</td>
<td>Carter &#8211; Reagan</td>
<td>80.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>1992</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN</td>
<td>Oct. 15</td>
<td>Bush &#8211; Clinton &#8211; Perot</td>
<td>69.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Sept. 23</td>
<td>Ford &#8211; Carter</td>
<td>69.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>1988</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 13</td>
<td>Bush &#8211; Dukakis</td>
<td>67.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>1984</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 21</td>
<td>Reagan &#8211; Mondale</td>
<td>67.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>1992</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN</td>
<td>Oct. 19</td>
<td>Bush &#8211; Clinton &#8211; Perot</td>
<td>66.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>1988</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Sept. 25</td>
<td>Bush &#8211; Dukakis</td>
<td>65.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>1984</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 7</td>
<td>Reagan &#8211; Mondale</td>
<td>65.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 6</td>
<td>Ford &#8211; Carter</td>
<td>63.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 22</td>
<td>Ford &#8211; Carter</td>
<td>62.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Note: There were no televised Presidential debates for the years 1972, 1968, and 1964.<br />
Copyright 2004 Nielsen Media Research.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-773"></span></p>
<p>In terms of Nielsen household TV ratings, Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy&#8217;s presidential debates in 1960 dominate Nielsen&#8217;s top 10 ranking. </p>
<p>The two candidates&#8217; October 13, 1960 debate, which drew 61% of all U.S. television households, claimed the top household rating of any presidential debate. </p>
<p>Nixon and Kennedy&#8217;s infamous September 26, 1960 debate &#8212; the first-ever televised presidential debate &#8212; ranked second, with 59.5% of all American TV households tuning in.   </p>
<p>Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan&#8217;s October 28, 1980 debate was the only non-Kennedy vs. Nixon debate to crack the top five. </p>
<p>All three of Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter&#8217;s 1976 debates also ranked among the top 10 televised presidential debates, in terms of household ratings.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>YEAR</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>DATE</th>
<th>CANDIDATES</th>
<th>RATING<br />
(% OF HOUSEHOLDS)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>1960</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 13</td>
<td>Nixon &#8211; Kennedy</td>
<td>61.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>1960</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Sept. 26</td>
<td>Nixon &#8211; Kennedy</td>
<td>59.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>1960</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 7</td>
<td>Nixon &#8211; Kennedy</td>
<td>59.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>1980</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 28</td>
<td>Carter &#8211; Reagan</td>
<td>58.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>1960</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 21</td>
<td>Nixon &#8211; Kennedy</td>
<td>57.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Sept. 23</td>
<td>Ford &#8211; Carter</td>
<td>53.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 6</td>
<td>Ford &#8211; Carter</td>
<td>52.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 22</td>
<td>Ford &#8211; Carter</td>
<td>47.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>1992</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN</td>
<td>Oct. 15</td>
<td>Bush &#8211; Clinton &#8211; Perot</td>
<td>46.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>1984</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>Oct. 21</td>
<td>Reagan &#8211; Mondale</td>
<td>46.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Note: There were no televised Presidential debates for the years 1972, 1968, and 1964.<br />
Copyright 2004 Nielsen Media Research.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View complete Nielsen <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/pres-vp-debates-1960-2004.xls">ratings</a> for all televised U.S. presidential and vice presidential debates from 1960 to present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-ten-presidential-debates-1960-to-present/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primetime Broadcast Ratings, September 26, 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-september-26-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-september-26-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Univision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC’s post-debate analysis of Barack Obama and John McCain&#8217;s first presidential debate was the top-ranked primetime telecast on broadcast TV for Friday, September 26, 2008.  The show drew an average of almost 8.3 million viewers.
CBS’s “The Mentalist” claimed second place, with almost 7.9 million average viewers, while NBC’s post-debate coverage rounded out the top three, with just over 7.1 million average viewers.
Post-debate analysis on CBS (6.1 million average viewers) and FOX News (3.9 million average viewers) also made the top ten.



RANK
NAME
NETWORK
VIEWERS (P2+)


1
VOTE2008: ANALYSIS-FRI(S)-09/26/2008
ABC
8,272,000


2
MENTALIST, THE-FRIDAY SP(S)-09/26/2008
CBS
7,896,000


3
DECISION &#8216;08:PRES ANALSYS(S)-09/26/2008
NBC
7,124,000


4
20/20 SP EDITION-9/26(S)-09/26/2008
ABC
6,891,000


5
CAMPAIGN &#8216;08-DEBATE ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC’s post-debate analysis of Barack Obama and John McCain&#8217;s first presidential debate was the top-ranked primetime telecast on broadcast TV for Friday, September 26, 2008.  The show drew an average of almost 8.3 million viewers.</p>
<p>CBS’s “The Mentalist” claimed second place, with almost 7.9 million average viewers, while NBC’s post-debate coverage rounded out the top three, with just over 7.1 million average viewers.</p>
<p>Post-debate analysis on CBS (6.1 million average viewers) and FOX News (3.9 million average viewers) also made the top ten.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>NAME</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>VIEWERS (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>VOTE2008: ANALYSIS-FRI(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>8,272,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>MENTALIST, THE-FRIDAY SP(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>7,896,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>DECISION &#8216;08:PRES ANALSYS(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>7,124,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>20/20 SP EDITION-9/26(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>6,891,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>CAMPAIGN &#8216;08-DEBATE ANL-1(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>6,140,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>SMARTER THAN 5TH GRADER</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>5,231,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>FRIDAY NIGHT SMACKDOWN</td>
<td>CW</td>
<td>4,411,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE FRI</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>4,333,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>FOX NEWS: DEB POST 1-9/26(S)-09/26/2008</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>3,896,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>AMERICA&#8217;S TOUGHEST JOBS</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>3,839,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (September 26, 2008)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall, CBS won the night with an average audience of just over 7.4 million viewers, while ABC took second place with just over 7.2 million average viewers. FOX and NBC claimed third and fourth places &#8212; with roughly 5.1 million and 4.7 million average viewers, respectively. The CW and Univision followed in fifth and sixth places with average audiences of roughly 4.4 million and 3.6 million viewers, respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-september-26-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>52.7 Million Watched President Bush’s Economic Crisis Address</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bush-economic-address/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bush-economic-address/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bail out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage backed securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[52.7 million viewers tuned in for President Bush&#8217;s speech on the U.S. economic crisis, which aired live Wednesday night from approximately 9:00pm to 9:15pm EST on ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, Telemundo, Univision, CNBC, CNN, FOX News Channel, and MSNBC.



 
Rating
Average Audience
Number


All Households
 33.2
 38,031,000


Persons 2+
 18.2
 52,653,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (September 24, 2008)


Note: Sum of audience estimates for ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, Telemundo, Univision, CNBC, CNN, FOX News Channel, and MSNBC.




As a comparison, TV ratings for selected major news events throughout the past two decades are included below.



Event
Number of Networks
Date
Average Combined Household Rating
Average Number of Viewers (P2+)


President Ford&#8217;s Funeral
8
1/2/2007
11.3
15,028,000


Michael Jackson ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button13.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1628" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button13-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>52.7 million viewers tuned in for President Bush&#8217;s speech on the U.S. economic crisis, which aired live Wednesday night from approximately 9:00pm to 9:15pm EST on ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, Telemundo, Univision, CNBC, CNN, FOX News Channel, and MSNBC.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="200"> </th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Average Audience<br />
Number</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">All Households</td>
<td> 33.2</td>
<td> 38,031,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Persons 2+</td>
<td> 18.2</td>
<td> 52,653,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (September 24, 2008)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Note: Sum of audience estimates for ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, Telemundo, Univision, CNBC, CNN, FOX News Channel, and MSNBC.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-1624"></span></p>
<p>As a comparison, TV ratings for selected major news events throughout the past two decades are included below.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Event</th>
<th>Number of Networks</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Average Combined Household Rating</th>
<th>Average Number of Viewers (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">President Ford&#8217;s Funeral</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>1/2/2007</td>
<td>11.3</td>
<td>15,028,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Michael Jackson Trial Verdict</td>
<td>11 &#8211; English Language</td>
<td>6/13/2005</td>
<td>21.1</td>
<td>28,115,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Michael Jackson Trial Verdict</td>
<td>2 &#8211; Spanish Language</td>
<td>6/13/2005</td>
<td>14.7</td>
<td>2,470,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">State of the Union</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>1/19/1999</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>43,500,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton’s Grand Jury Testimony</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>9/21/1998</td>
<td>18.8</td>
<td>22,500,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton’s Apology Address to Country</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>8/17/1998</td>
<td>46.9</td>
<td>67,600,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Princess Diana’s Funeral–Sat 6-8am</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>9/6/1997</td>
<td>26.6</td>
<td>33,252,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">OJ Simpson Verdict</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>10/5/1995</td>
<td>42.9</td>
<td>53,925,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">State of Union-Clinton</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>1/25/1994</td>
<td>32.9</td>
<td>45,800,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton Address re: Health Care</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>9/22/1993</td>
<td>32.8</td>
<td>47,700,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Joint Session of Congress by Clinton</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2/17/1993</td>
<td>44.3</td>
<td>66,900,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton Address on the Economy</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2/15/1993</td>
<td>42.1</td>
<td>64,300,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Bush News Conference re: LA Riots</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>5/1/1991</td>
<td>37.1</td>
<td>54,600,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Gulf War Day One</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1/16/1991</td>
<td>54.3</td>
<td>85,600,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (2007)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/media_alert5.pdf">media alert</a>.</p>
<p>Read <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/09/527_million_watched_presidents.php">coverage</a> of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in TV Week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/bush-economic-address/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two-Thirds Of U.S. Households Tuned In To Dems&#8217; and GOP&#8217;s Conventions</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/two-thirds-of-us-households-tuned-in-to-dems-and-gops-conventions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/two-thirds-of-us-households-tuned-in-to-dems-and-gops-conventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic national convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican national convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s one of the few points not up for debate this election season: TV coverage of the typically uneventful U.S. political conventions drew record-breaking audiences. 
Nearly two-thirds of all U.S. households (64.5%) &#8212; 120.1 million people age two or older &#8212; watched at least one of the 2008 political conventions, according to a new analysis released Thursday by Nielsen. 
Viewership levels for the Democratic and Republican conventions were essentially even, with about half of all U.S. households watching each.  Overall, 15% of all homes tuned in to the Republican National Convention only, while 15.7% ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button9.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1394" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button9-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>It&#8217;s one of the few points not up for debate this election season: TV coverage of the typically uneventful U.S. political conventions drew record-breaking audiences. </p>
<p>Nearly two-thirds of all U.S. households (64.5%) &#8212; 120.1 million people age two or older &#8212; watched at least one of the 2008 political conventions, according to a new <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2008_convention_tvr-final1.pdf">analysis</a> released Thursday by Nielsen. </p>
<p>Viewership levels for the Democratic and Republican conventions were essentially even, with about half of all U.S. households watching each.  Overall, 15% of all homes tuned in to the Republican National Convention only, while 15.7% tuned in to just the Democratic National Convention.  Another 33.9% of all households tuned in to both conventions.</p>
<p>Homes that watched both conventions were likely to be older (age 65+) and better educated (32.3% had college degrees) than viewers who watched only one of the conventions. </p>
<p>RNC-only households were usually bigger (four people or more), had higher incomes ($100,000+), and were more likely to be white, while DNC-only households were smaller (two people), less wealthy ($20,000 or less), and more likely to be African American.</p>
<p><span id="more-1393"></span></p>
<p>One-fifth (21.2%) of DNC-only homes were headed by an African American, while 83.5% of RNC-only homes were headed someone who is white.</p>
<p>Similar percentages of African American and white viewers tuned in to both conventions (35.7% and 34.5%, respectively).  Among African Americans, 27.4% watched only the DNC, and only 8.1% watched only the RNC.  Meanwhile, 16.2% of white viewers watched the RNC only, and 13.6% watched the DNC only.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2008_convention_tvr-final.pdf">full report</a> &#8212; and stay tuned during the presidential debates for <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/category/politics/" target="_blank">more</a> Nielsen TV audience analyses.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in the <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/zontv/2008/09/tv_convention_viewing_shows_ra.html" target="_blank">Baltimore Sun</a>, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/09/the_numbers_on.html" target="_blank">The Boston Globe</a>, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6597639.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Broadcasting &amp; Cable</a>, and <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6597600.html?q=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">Multichannel News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/two-thirds-of-us-households-tuned-in-to-dems-and-gops-conventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historical TV Ratings: Republican Conventions</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/historical-tv-ratings-republican-conventions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/historical-tv-ratings-republican-conventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



YEAR
NETWORKS
TOTAL RATING
TOTAL HOMES


2004
Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC
15.3*
16,809,000*


2000
Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC
13.9**
14,042,000**


1996
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS
16.5***
15,756,000***


1992
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS
20.5
20,000,000


1988
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
18.3
16,200,000


1984
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
19.2
16,200,000


1980
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
21.6
16,500,000


1976
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
31.5
21,900,000


1972
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
23.4
14,400,000


1968
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
26.4
15,000,000


1964
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
21.8
11,130,000


1960
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
28
12,596,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (1960 &#8211; 2004)


Presidential nominating conventions are held in July and August with the party holding the Presidency scheduling its convention last. Changes in the parties’ primary system have impacted the conventions in recent campaigns.


*2004 data based on the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button8.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-695" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button8-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>YEAR</th>
<th>NETWORKS</th>
<th>TOTAL RATING</th>
<th>TOTAL HOMES</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2004</td>
<td>Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC</td>
<td>15.3*</td>
<td>16,809,000*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2000</td>
<td>Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC</td>
<td>13.9**</td>
<td>14,042,000**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1996</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS</td>
<td>16.5***</td>
<td>15,756,000***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1992</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS</td>
<td>20.5</td>
<td>20,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1988</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>18.3</td>
<td>16,200,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1984</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>19.2</td>
<td>16,200,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1980</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>21.6</td>
<td>16,500,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1976</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>31.5</td>
<td>21,900,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1972</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>23.4</td>
<td>14,400,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1968</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>26.4</td>
<td>15,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1964</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>21.8</td>
<td>11,130,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1960</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>12,596,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (1960 &#8211; 2004)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Presidential nominating conventions are held in July and August with the party holding the Presidency scheduling its convention last. Changes in the parties’ primary system have impacted the conventions in recent campaigns.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">*2004 data based on the sum of Rep. Convention Coverage during Common Coverage Time Periods: CNN, FOXNC, MSNBC= Monday 10-11:00PM; ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOXNC, MSNBC* = Tuesday and Wednesday: 10-11:00PM; ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOXNC, MSNBC* = Thursday: 10-11:15PM. (*coverage includes sustained programs).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">**2000 data based on the sum of Rep. Convention Coverage during Common Coverage Time Periods: ABC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC=Mon-Thu appr.10-11pm; CBS=Wed-Thu appr. 10-11pm; NBC=Tue-Thu appr. 10-11pm.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">***The Family Channel also aired the &#8216;96 Republican Convention but is not included in the Total Rating and Total Homes.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/historical-tv-ratings-republican-conventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historical TV Ratings: Democratic Conventions</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/historical-tv-ratings-democratic-conventions-1960-2004/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/historical-tv-ratings-democratic-conventions-1960-2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



YEAR
NETWORKS
TOTAL RATING
TOTAL HOMES


2004
Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC
14.3*
15,537,000*


2000
Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC
15.3**
15,380,000**


1996
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS
17.2
16,418,000


1992
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS
22
20,500,000


1988
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
19.8
17,400,000


1984
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
23.4
19,500,000


1980
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
27
20,700,000


1976
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
25.2
17,400,000


1972
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
18.3
11,400,000


1968
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
28.5
16,200,000


1964
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
28.8
14,695,000


1960
Total– ABC, CBS, NBC
29.2
13,216,000


Source: The Nielsen Company (1960 &#8211; 2004)


Presidential nominating conventions are held in July and August with the party holding the Presidency scheduling its convention last. Changes in the parties’ primary system have impacted the conventions in recent campaigns.


*2004 data based on the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button9.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-697" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button9-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>YEAR</th>
<th>NETWORKS</th>
<th>TOTAL RATING</th>
<th>TOTAL HOMES</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2004</td>
<td>Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC</td>
<td>14.3*</td>
<td>15,537,000*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2000</td>
<td>Total- ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC</td>
<td>15.3**</td>
<td>15,380,000**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1996</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS</td>
<td>17.2</td>
<td>16,418,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1992</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>20,500,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1988</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>19.8</td>
<td>17,400,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1984</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>23.4</td>
<td>19,500,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1980</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>27</td>
<td>20,700,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1976</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>25.2</td>
<td>17,400,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1972</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>18.3</td>
<td>11,400,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1968</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>28.5</td>
<td>16,200,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1964</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>28.8</td>
<td>14,695,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1960</td>
<td>Total– ABC, CBS, NBC</td>
<td>29.2</td>
<td>13,216,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (1960 &#8211; 2004)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Presidential nominating conventions are held in July and August with the party holding the Presidency scheduling its convention last. Changes in the parties’ primary system have impacted the conventions in recent campaigns.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">*2004 data based on the sum of Dem. Convention Coverage during Common Coverage Time Periods: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC = Mon, Wed, Thur. 10-11:00pm; CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC = Tues appr. 10-11pm.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">**2000 data based on the sum of Dem. Convention Coverage during Common Coverage Time periods: ABC, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNC = Mon appr. 10-11:45p, and Tues through Thurs. appr. 10-11pm; NBC= Mon 10:30-11:45p, Wed-Thu 10-11pm; CBS=Wed-Thu appr. 10-11pm</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/historical-tv-ratings-democratic-conventions-1960-2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s V.P. Text Message Reaches 2.9 Million</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/obamas-text-message-reaches-29-million-and-makes-history/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/obamas-text-message-reaches-29-million-and-makes-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic national convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text message]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Barack Obama Campaign generated significant buzz this weekend by announcing Senator Obama’s Vice Presidential selection via SMS text-message. Nielsen estimates that 2.9 million U.S. mobile subscribers received a text message from the Obama campaign over the weekend.
The Vice Presidential message (sent in the late hours of Friday night) is, by many accounts, the single largest mobile marketing event ever in the U.S.
“From a mobile perspective, it makes sense that the campaign chose to use text-messages,” Nic Covey, Director of Insights, Nielsen Mobile, noted. “Today, 116 million U.S. mobile subscribers (52 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button6.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-656" title="election2008_button6" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button6-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The Barack Obama Campaign generated significant buzz this weekend by announcing Senator Obama’s Vice Presidential selection via SMS text-message. Nielsen estimates that 2.9 million U.S. mobile subscribers received a text message from the Obama campaign over the weekend.</p>
<p>The Vice Presidential message (sent in the late hours of Friday night) is, by many accounts, the single largest mobile marketing event ever in the U.S.</p>
<p>“From a mobile perspective, it makes sense that the campaign chose to use text-messages,” Nic Covey, Director of Insights, Nielsen Mobile, noted. “Today, 116 million U.S. mobile subscribers (52 percent of subscribers) actively use text messaging, making it a new mass medium for marketing efforts.”</p>
<p>Obama’s VP text-message is already being seen as one of the most important text messages ever sent, and one of the most successful brand engagements using mobile media. “The value of the message goes far beyond the 26 words and 2.9 million recipients,” Covey said. “Here, Obama branded himself as cutting edge, inflated the already enormous press attention paid to his VP pick and further established a list of supporters’ most coveted form of contact: their cell phone numbers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-ustext0827,0,6535366.story" target="_blank">Newsday</a> and the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2008/08/obamas-vp-text.html" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/obamas-text-message-reaches-29-million-and-makes-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presidential Candidates Neglect Online Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/presidential-candidates-neglect-online-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/presidential-candidates-neglect-online-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. presidential election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senators McCain and Obama are each spending sizable sums of money on TV advertising during the Olympics.  But when it comes to placing display advertising online, both candidates have relatively unimpressive records, Mediaweek Senior Editor Mike Shields noted Monday in a column.
&#8220;The 2008 race has been lametastic when it comes to online advertising,&#8221; Shields wrote, adding: &#8220;McCain’s been nearly invisible when it comes to display advertising.&#8221;
Senator McCain placed 16 million online display ad impressions in June, while Sen. Obama ran 80 million impressions, Shields noted, citing Nielsen Online data. 
View additional ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-399" style="float: left;" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/election2008_button-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Senators McCain and Obama are each spending <a href="http://adage.com/campaigntrail/post?article_id=130119" target="_blank">sizable sums</a> of money on TV advertising during the Olympics.  But when it comes to placing display advertising online, both candidates have relatively unimpressive records, Mediaweek Senior Editor Mike Shields noted Monday in a <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/esearch/e3idb3a085b28cc4116812c3d422d30638f" target="_blank">column</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;The 2008 race has been lametastic when it comes to online advertising,&#8221; Shields wrote, adding: &#8220;McCain’s been nearly invisible when it comes to display advertising.&#8221;</p>
<p>Senator McCain placed 16 million online display ad impressions in June, while Sen. Obama ran 80 million impressions, Shields noted, citing Nielsen Online data. </p>
<p>View additional Nielsen Online advertising <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/data.xls">data</a> for the 2008 presidential candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/presidential-candidates-neglect-online-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
