<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; nfl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/nfl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Super Bowl’s Greatest Hits: Top 10 Most Liked Ads of the Past Five Years</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super Bowl ads are known for generating buzz—and viewers—but not all creatives are created equal. Nielsen reveals America’s most liked commercials over the past five years, and the NFL itself tops the list. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super Bowl ads are known for generating buzz—and viewers—but not all creatives are created equal. Nielsen reveals America’s most liked commercials over the past five years, and the NFL itself tops the list.  Regardless of category, emotional appeals, humor, non-fatal violence, and animals bolster quality ads and strongly resonate with consumers when executed well.</p>
<p>Of the 144 brands that have advertised during the Super Bowl over the past five years, only a handful of companies have had a presence in every one. From 2007-2011, these seven have earn honorable mentions for being the most resilient Super Bowl advertisers—Budweiser, CareerBuilder, Coca-Cola, Doritos, E*Trade, GoDaddy.com, and the NFL—and five also hold the distinction of being among the ten best liked Super Bowl ads of the past five years.</p>
<div id="playlist"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;">Nielsen’s Top Ten Most Liked Super Bowl Ads, 2007-2011</span>
<div class="yt_holder">
<div id="ytvideo2"></div>
<ul class="demo2">
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pvBvcuSV0w"><span class="number">1</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super Bowl XLII<br /><strong>NFL</strong></center>Chester Pitts walks  onto the Houston Texans team (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>179</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1hlGlFuWRc"><span class="number">2</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Budweiser</strong></center>A horse trains intensively to join the elite Clydesdales (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>176</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEH1omnG77c"><span class="number">3</span><span class="year"><center>2010 &bull; Super Bowl XLIV<br /><strong>Snickers</strong></center>Betty White and Abe  Vigoda are tackled (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>168</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3Nmkq60uaQ"><span class="number">4</span><span class="year"><center>2009 &bull; Super  Bowl XLIII<br /><strong>Budweiser</strong></center>Clydesdale wants to  play his version of fetch (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>167</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0V6c1rzTsQ"><span class="number">5</span><span class="year"><center>2011 &bull;  Super Bowl XLV<br /><strong>Volkswagen</strong></center>Mini Darth Vader uses  the Force to turn on a car (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>165</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiMf5cCDy1I"><span class="number">6</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Coca-Cola</strong></center>Stewie, Wonder Dog,  and Charlie Brown balloons compete for soda (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>155</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUFvJNQ0bnM"><span class="number">7</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLI<br /><strong>Doritos</strong></center>Man faces consequences of snacking while driving (:30) <br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>153</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFsKeDAJPak"><span class="number">8</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Bridgestone</strong></center>Forest animals scream as car nearly hits a squirrel (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>150</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cCli-IPaoU"><span class="number">9</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull;Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>E*Trade</strong></center>Baby says he rented a  clown with his extra money (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>146</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT6YOgbB-gM"><span class="number">10</span><span class="year"><center>2009 &bull; Super Bowl XLIII<br /><strong>Doritos</strong></center>Man has magical  powers when he crunches his snack chip (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>145</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Only ad executions during Super Bowl airings from 2007-2011 considered.  The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">For example, with a Likeability index of 179 the top ranked NFL ad has proven to be 79 percent better-liked than the average Super Bowl commercial during the past four-week period.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Source: Nielsen</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giants vs Patriots: Playbook for the Social Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30845" title="SuperBowlBuzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz1.gif" alt="SuperBowlBuzz" width="575" height="1008" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png">(click for high resolution image)</a></p>
<h3>Patriots have more online visitors, but Giants fans run up web stats</h3>
<p>During the run up to the playoffs in December 2011, the Patriots had 644,000 unique visitors to their official website, topping the Giants’ 574,000 visitors. However, Giants fans were more engaged when visiting their team’s website, viewing nearly twice as many pages (17 page views per person) compared to Patriots visitors, and spending over 10 minutes each on average.</p>
<h3>Super Bowl buzz: Giants fans cheer more for team, Tom Brady is MVP of social media</h3>
<p>Fans’ excitement throughout the playoffs carried over to social media. The Giants had more buzz about their team each week, with a 59 percent share of buzz compared to the Patriots’ 41 percent of buzz volume on blogs, message boards/forums, public posts on Twitter and Facebook and online news posts.  But Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady surpassed Giants QB Eli Manning, with nearly double the amount of buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buzz and Marketability: Scoring the NFL&#8217;s Top Quarterbacks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/buzz-and-marketability-scoring-the-nfls-top-quarterbacks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/buzz-and-marketability-scoring-the-nfls-top-quarterbacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen, Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Donovan McNabb hold the highest N-Scores, a measure of marketability created in tandem with E-Poll, yet Michael Vick, Tom Brady, Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers garnered the most buzz online since last September. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good quarterback does more than just run the offense and lead the team, he brings some caché—both to marketers and to fans.  Among NFL QBs, Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Donovan McNabb hold the highest N-Scores, Nielsen&#8217;s measure of marketability created in tandem with E-Poll. However, Michael Vick, Tom Brady, Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers garnered the most buzz online since last September. Michael Vick was the hands down most buzzed about, with 16.3 percent of all quarterback buzz.</p>
<p>And an oft-discussed quarterback can lead (or follow) his team to buzz dominance as well. Half of the top 10 quarterbacks by N-Score were on the top 10 teams with the most buzz; however, there are a number of players and teams where no connection appears. Tony Romo garnered slightly higher than the median quarterback buzz (1.8%) while the Dallas Cowboys were one of the most buzzed about teams with 5.8 percent of all online buzz mentions. Incidentally, the Cowboys also had the most unique visitors to their website on average.</p>
<p>High awareness of a player—as captured through the N-Score—can also be indicative of a player’s buzz. For players like the Eagles’ Michael Vick and the Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger, their awareness and buzz are both high—yet their N-Score, which takes into account traits such as likeability, down-to-earth and talented—reflects negative public reaction to their activity off the field (13 and 16, respectively). Besides Matt Hasselbeck, all of the top 10 quarterbacks by N-Score received high online buzz.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6">Top 10 NFL Quarterbacks by National N-score</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Player</th>
<th>2010 Team<br />
(2011 Team)</th>
<th>National N-Score</th>
<th>Awareness</th>
<th>Share of QB Buzz</th>
<th>Team Buzz</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peyton Manning</td>
<td>Indianapolis Colts</td>
<td>262</td>
<td>49%</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Drew Brees</td>
<td>New Orleans Saints</td>
<td>166</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>4.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Donovan McNabb</td>
<td>Washington Redskins<br />
(Minnesota Vikings)</td>
<td>153</td>
<td>29</td>
<td>2.3</td>
<td>2.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tom Brady</td>
<td>New England Patriots</td>
<td>131</td>
<td>35</td>
<td>4.8</td>
<td>4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aaron Rodgers</td>
<td>Green Bay Packers</td>
<td>119</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brett Farve</td>
<td>Minnestoa Vikings (Retired)</td>
<td>108</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>5.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eli Manning</td>
<td>New York Giants</td>
<td>105</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>6.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tim Tebow</td>
<td>Denver Broncos</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>2.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Ryan</td>
<td>Atlanta Falcons</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Hasselbeck*</td>
<td>Seattle Seahawks (Tennessee Titans)</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.1</td>
<td>1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sam Bradford*</td>
<td>St. Louis Rams</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">Read as: Peyton Manning had a National N-score of 262, and accounted for 5.8% of all buzz about NFL Quarterbacks during the 2010 season through the August 2011.<br />
Note: Team Buzz describes online buzz about each player&#8217;s 2010 season team.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Players with lesser awareness can also become buzz generators online. Alex Smith and Mark Sanchez, who were nationally known by just four and 16 percent of the population, respectively, had a tremendous amount of player buzz—higher than three percent of all quarterback buzz. Sanchez may benefit from his association with the Jets, the NFL’s most buzzed about team.</p>
<p>“Buzz for the NFL has ramped up this summer as the lockout-shortened off season created a flurry of trades and free agent signings that gave fans plenty to talk about.  We’re closely watching to see how all of this excitement in August translates to TV ratings in September. Roughly 18 million Americans tuned in to nationally broadcast NFL games, on average, during the 2010-2011 season,” said Stephen Master, Vice President, Sports for Nielsen.</p>
<p>Masters continued, “It will be interesting to see how fans respond to controversial players, such as Michael Vick, this season. His strong performance on the field was rewarded with a $100 million contract, but he’s still a polarizing figure nationally with a higher than average number of Americans expressing dislike for him, according to the N-Score.”</p>
<div class="table_meta"><strong>Methodology</strong><br />
Using the combined research expertise of Nielsen and E-Poll Market  Research, N-Score is an in-depth look at a sports figure’s overall  endorsement potential, factoring in the attributes and demographic  measures that align brands with endorsers.  Each individual N-Score  National survey is administered to 1,100 people within that panel via  the Internet. The sample is representative of the general population  based on gender, income, age, and education. Awareness, as noted in the Wire post above, is determined by showing half of the survey participants a picture of the athlete and half the athlete’s name.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/buzz-and-marketability-scoring-the-nfls-top-quarterbacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Fans Generate Online Buzz in Run-up to the Football Season</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among NFL teams, the NY Jets generated the most online buzz during the off-season from blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter, Facebook, and online news posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As NFL fans gear up for the season ahead and prepare the rosters for their fantasy football teams, they head online for news and buzz about their favorite teams and players.</p>
<p>Among NFL teams, the NY Jets generated the most online buzz during the off-season from blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter, Facebook, and online news posts. &#8220;America&#8217;s Team,&#8221; the Dallas Cowboys continue to generate national interest in online discussions, although they were topped by their rivals, the Philadelphia Eagles, who led NFC teams and were second in overall pre-season buzz. The NY Giants, and their regional rival, the New England Patriots, round out the top five teams with the most pre-season buzz.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Pre-season buzz about NFL Teams</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>NFL Team</th>
<th>Share of Total NFL Team Buzz</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>New York Jets</td>
<td>11.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Philadelphia Eagles</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>New York Giants</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Dallas Cowboys</td>
<td>5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>New England Patriots</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Read as: The NY Jets had the most buzz among all NFL teams during the pre-season.<br />
Source: Nielsen, July 31 &#8211; August 6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>An abbreviated off-season due to the NFL lockout sparked a flurry of free-agent signings and trades of popular players, and generated considerable online buzz among sports fans.  Looking at players who have changed teams ahead of the 2011 season, Reggie Bush received the most buzz during the off-season with 194k mentions. Comparing buzz about NFL players who joined new teams through free-agency or trade in recent weeks, Plaxico Burress led this group of players with more than 13k mentions during the week of July 31 – August 6, followed by Reggie Bush, Nnamdi Asomugha, Chad Ochocinco, and Donovan McNabb.</p>
<p>One in four active web users in the US visited sites in the Sports category, which amounts to 42.5 million Americans during the most recent week (ending July 31).  Compared to weeks during the off-season, the NFL’s network of sites more than doubled their audience, a 258 percent increase in unique US visitors during the first full week after the NFL lockout ended.</p>
<table class="chart">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top Sports Sites During Week of July 31</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Website</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Yahoo! Sports</td>
<td>14,859</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>ESPN Digital Network</td>
<td>9,515</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>FOXSports.com on MSN</td>
<td>7,419</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>NFL Internet Network</td>
<td>4,923</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>MLB.com</td>
<td>4,906</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Read as: Yahoo! Sports had 14.9 million unique US visitors during the week ending July 31, about 8.9% of active web users during the week from Home/Work PCs and laptop computers.<br />
Source: Nielsen, July 25 &#8211; July 31, 2011</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As US sports fans go online for the latest news and stats, Yahoo&#8217;s network of sports sites was their top destination during the week of July 31. ESPN.com and FoxSports.com websites were also popular destinations for US sports fans in this most recent week. Historically the months of August and September are the busiest for sports sites, so this may provide another preview of the season to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For NFL, Does a High Draft Pick Mean Higher Player Marketability?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/sports/for-nfl-does-a-high-draft-pick-mean-higher-player-marketability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/sports/for-nfl-does-a-high-draft-pick-mean-higher-player-marketability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footbal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL draft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the Nielsen/E-Poll N-Scores of the No. 1 football draft picks from the past decade—as well as a review of the top 10 N-Scores of current NFL players—found that draft position rarely translates into long-term marketability.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those players passed over for the NFL draft’s coveted top spot shouldn’t be too disappointed. A look at the Nielsen/E-Poll N-Scores of the No. 1 draft picks from the past decade—as well as a review of the top 10 N-Scores of current NFL players—found that draft position rarely translates into long-term marketability.  The N-Score evaluates name, image awareness, appeal and attributes such as sincerity, approachability, experience and influence to determine a player’s endorsement potential.</p>
<p>While first round picks like 1998’s top choice Peyton Manning and 2004’s top pick Eli Manning (with N-Scores of 262 and 105) rank among the most marketable players, they are the exceptions to the rule. Eight of the top picks from the past decade have an N-Score less than 20, while others receive no recognition when it comes to their brand. Meanwhile, Tom Brady, one of the most marketable players with an N-Score of 131, was a sixth round draft pick for the New England Patriots.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> N-Scores for Top NFL Draft Picks</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Draft Year</th>
<th> Player</th>
<th> Team</th>
<th> N-Score -National</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2000</td>
<td>Courtney Brown</td>
<td>Cleveland Browns</td>
<td>n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2001</td>
<td>Michael Vick</td>
<td>Atlanta Falcons</td>
<td>25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2002</td>
<td>David Carr</td>
<td>Houston Texans</td>
<td>n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2003</td>
<td>Carson Palmer</td>
<td>Cincinnati Bengals</td>
<td>15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2004</td>
<td>Eli Manning</td>
<td>San Diego Chargers</td>
<td>105</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2005</td>
<td>Alex Smith</td>
<td>San Francisco 49ers</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2006</td>
<td>Mario Williams</td>
<td>Houston Texans</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2007</td>
<td>JaMarcus Russell</td>
<td>Oakland Raiders</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2008</td>
<td>Jake Long</td>
<td>Miami Dolphins</td>
<td>n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2009</td>
<td>Matthew Stafford</td>
<td>Detroit Lions</td>
<td>10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2010</td>
<td>Sam Bradford</td>
<td>St. Louis Rams</td>
<td>21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6"> Top Ten N-Scores of Current NFL Players</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Player</th>
<th> Draft Year</th>
<th> Team</th>
<th> N-Score -National</th>
<th> Draft Position</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Peyton Manning</td>
<td>1998</td>
<td>Indianapolis Colts</td>
<td>262</td>
<td>#1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Drew Brees</td>
<td>2001</td>
<td>San Diego Chargers</td>
<td>166</td>
<td>#32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Troy Polamalu</td>
<td>2003</td>
<td>Pittsburgh Steelers</td>
<td>165</td>
<td>#16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Donovan McNabb</td>
<td>1999</td>
<td>Philadelphia Eagles</td>
<td>153</td>
<td>#2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Tom Brady</td>
<td>2000</td>
<td>New England Patriots</td>
<td>131</td>
<td>#199</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Aaron Rodgers</td>
<td>2005</td>
<td>Green Bay Packers</td>
<td>119</td>
<td>#24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Eli Manning</td>
<td>2004</td>
<td>San Diego Chargers</td>
<td>105</td>
<td>#1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Mike Wallace</td>
<td>2009</td>
<td>Pittsburgh Steelers</td>
<td>100</td>
<td>#84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>LaDainian Tomlinson</td>
<td>2001</td>
<td>San Diego Chargers</td>
<td>57</td>
<td>#5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Charles Woodson</td>
<td>1998</td>
<td>Oakland Raiders</td>
<td>51</td>
<td>#4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>“As with most things, the Manning brothers are standouts—it’s rare that first draft picks achieve their level of marketability,” said Stephen Master, VP <a href="http://nielsen.com/us/en/industries/media-entertainment/sports.html">Nielsen Sports</a>.  “It takes a lot more than early buzz to yield the long-term benefits—and dollars—of endorsements. Endorsement potential over the course of a career is the product of a sustained presence in the public eye rather than a flash of early on-the-field promise.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/sports/for-nfl-does-a-high-draft-pick-mean-higher-player-marketability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl XLV Most Viewed Telecast in U.S. Broadcast History</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, making it the most watched television program of all time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to preliminary results from The Nielsen Company, last night’s broadcast of Super Bowl XLV on FOX had an average audience of 111 million viewers, surpassing last year’s Super Bowl, and thereby breaking the record, yet again, for the most watched television program of all time in the U.S.  The game was viewed in 53.3 million households, with a preliminary 46.0 U.S. household rating.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Most Watched  Telecasts of All Time (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Avg. # of Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLV</td>
<td>February 6, 2011</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>111,010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td>February 7, 2010</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>106,476</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>M*A*S*H Special</td>
<td>February 28, 1983</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>105,970</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLIII</td>
<td>February 1, 2009</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>98,732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XLII</td>
<td>February 3, 2008</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>97,448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Bowl XXX</td>
<td>January 28, 1996</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>94,076</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>“Super Bowl XLV caps what is arguably the most successful season that any sports league has ever had,” said Pat McDonough,   “The number of people watching NFL games has never been higher, with 24% more people watching the average NFL game this year than just five years ago.  The Super Bowl continues to be in a category of its own, with an appeal that transcends sports and extends even to the commercials.  Because of the cliff-hanger nature of the game, viewers were tuning in until the very end, driving viewing levels to new heights.”</p>
<p>Over the past several years, the NFL has attracted larger audiences by <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/">broadening its appeal to new audiences</a>, including women and Hispanics, by building up high-profile players – especially quarterbacks – to personify the league and by cross-promoting the games across multiple television networks and emerging digital platforms.</p>
<p><strong>Pittsburgh and Milwaukee Lead Local Market viewing</strong><br />
In the local markets, Milwaukee and Pittsburgh were tied, with a 59.7 household rating.  Other high local market ratings include Columbus, OH and Nashville.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top Five Local Markets, Super Bowl XLV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Share</th>
<th>Households (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>87</td>
<td>693</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Milwaukee</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>538</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Columbus, OH</td>
<td>56.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>515</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>564</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News</td>
<td>54.2</td>
<td>76</td>
<td>388</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-xlv-most-viewed-telecast-in-broadcast-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Football TV Ratings Soar: the NFL&#8217;s Playbook for Success</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year’s Super Bowl was the most watched TV program in U.S. history. With 106.5 million viewers, the game supplanted the long-time leading final episode of M*A*S*H (which had 105.5 million viewers in 1983).  Will this year’s NFL championship game beat the record again?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year’s Super Bowl was the most watched TV program in U.S. history. With 106.5 million viewers, the game supplanted the long-time leading final episode of M*A*S*H (which had 105.5 million viewers in 1983).  Will this year’s NFL championship game beat the record again? Many factors, from the competitiveness of the game to the weather, will come into play, but there is no question that football as a whole is more popular than ever on television.</p>
<p>A decade ago, the Baltimore Ravens – with a defense coached by Rex Ryan – beat the New York Giants in a lopsided 34-7 victory. Super Bowl XXXV was watched by 84.3 million viewers, down nearly 4 million from the year before. While that level of viewership was still high, the NFL’s prominence in the national consciousness and on television is stronger now, thanks to a perfect storm of social, media, cultural and technological developments in addition to some pretty savvy marketing.</p>
<p>It’s not just the Super Bowl that is drawing more viewers: Regular season ratings are also strong. In the past five years, ratings of NFL games have risen by more than one percentage point (from 9.3 in 2006 to 10.6 in 2010), accounting for more than 3.5 million additional viewers per game. In fact, eight out of the top ten primetime programs for the entire year were football games (and one – Undercover Boss – appeared immediately after the Super Bowl).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Top 10 TV Programs – Single Telecast 2010</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Telecast</th>
<th> Originator</th>
<th> Date Aired</th>
<th> Total Persons Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">36.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV Post    Game</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">25.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Super Bowl Kick-Off</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>FOX NFC Championship</td>
<td align="center">FOX</td>
<td align="center">1/24/10</td>
<td align="center">19.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>AFC Championship on    CBS</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">1/24/10</td>
<td align="center">16.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Academy Awards</td>
<td align="center">ABC</td>
<td align="center">3/7/10</td>
<td align="center">14.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Undercover Boss</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">2/7/10</td>
<td align="center">13.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>FOX NFC Playoff-Sun</td>
<td align="center">FOX</td>
<td align="center">1/17/10</td>
<td align="center">12.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>AFC Divisional    Playoff-Sun</td>
<td align="center">CBS</td>
<td align="center">1/17/10</td>
<td align="center">12.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>FOX NFC Wildcard    Game</td>
<td align="center">FOX</td>
<td align="center">1/10/10</td>
<td align="center">11.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>What accounts for football’s hold on the television population? As usual, there isn’t only one answer, but here are some possibilities.</p>
<p><strong>Cross Marketing</strong><br />
While most other professional sports are broadcast on two or three networks, the NFL is spread across five, including three of the four major broadcast networks. This ubiquity has the effect of creating a cross-platform promotional powerhouse. Although the networks ostensibly promote their own upcoming games, in reality they are promoting football in general and the average viewer is exposed to myriad football promotions throughout the season. As a consequence, the average viewer is virtually guaranteed exposure to football marketing and advertising.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>More Female Fans</strong><br />
More American women watch the NFL than any other team sport, and not just the Super Bowl.  In the regular season, the NFL has eclipsed Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association in having the largest percentage of female viewers. In the past decade the NFL has launched several marketing and outreach programs, including coaching clinics, apparel that fits women and donning pink during breast cancer awareness month. Further, watching football tends to be a social event, with people watching in groups of varying gender composition. As a result, the percentage of the football audience that is female has grown from 32.6% in 2006 to 33.6% in 2010.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Season</th>
<th>Household Rating</th>
<th>Total Audience Viewers (000)</th>
<th>Male Viewers (000) and % of audience</th>
<th>Female Viewers (000) and % of audience</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>9.3</td>
<td>14,430  100.00%</td>
<td>9,732  67.44%</td>
<td>4,697  32.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2010</td>
<td>10.6</td>
<td>17,867  100.00%</td>
<td>11,865  66.41%</td>
<td>6,002  33.59%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><strong>Biggest markets have successful seasons</strong><br />
NFL has always relied on a mix of large and small markets, and with a strict salary cap and generous revenue sharing, teams from smaller markets such as Green Bay or Pittsburgh can compete financially with Chicago or New York.  As a result markets and regions are not perpetually at a competitive disadvantage as they are in other sports. In 2010, a whopping 24 of 32 NFL Local Markets enjoyed higher regular season ratings, with New Orleans pulling in the highest rating (43.9, up 6%) and St. Louis posting the highest percentage growth (up 66%).</p>
<p>Nevertheless, this year, some of the largest markets had the most successful teams and their local regular season game ratings posted solid increases, which contributed to higher national ratings when these teams appeared in national broadcasts.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Largest NFL Markets</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Market</th>
<th>2010 Local Rating</th>
<th>YOY Rating % Change</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>New York (Giants)</td>
<td>14.7</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Boston</td>
<td>30.9</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td>27.6</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>New York (Jets)</td>
<td>12.7</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philidelphia</td>
<td>28.3</td>
<td>5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><strong>QBs have Become Stars, On and Off the Field</strong><br />
In 2001, journeyman Trent Dilfer led the Ravens to a Championship, creating the perception that a team can win a Super Bowl without a marquee quarterback. Most NFL teams now subscribe to the belief that the quarterback is the most critical cog, both on and off the field. The Cowboys, for example, lost QB Tony Romo to injury and saw their season and ratings go south.</p>
<p>In recent years, the NFL has tried to safeguard their stars, implementing rules to ensure that the QB isn’t tackled low, hit in the head or after the whistle. And to a large extent, the quarterbacks this year were healthy and able to serve as the marquee names for their teams.</p>
<p>Interest in quarterbacks goes beyond the stadium: they are making news off the field too. Many have been linked romantically to supermodels, actresses and singers, creating news in celebrity magazines and other non-traditional media. Others have generated publicity for less positive reasons.</p>
<p>Leading the Super Bowl XLV teams are Aaron Rodgers of the Packers and Ben Roethlisberger of the Steelers. Rodgers is a rising star but  Roethlisberger, who has already won two Super Bowl rings, saw his reputation suffer in the wake of sexual assault allegations that were brought against him.</p>
<p>These perceptions of Rodgers and Roethlisberger are borne out by their N-Scores.  Together with E-Poll, Nielsen has devised a method of measuring the endorsement potential of more than 1,000 athletes and sports personalities.  Neither Rodgers nor Roethlisberger have N-Scores that approach the best known and most popular quarterbacks:</p>
<table class="chart" border="0" width="300">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">QB N-Scores</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Peyton Manning</td>
<td>262</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brett Favre</td>
<td>196</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tom Brady</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aaron Rodgers</td>
<td>39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Roethlisberger</td>
<td>24</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>The trend lines further illustrate the challenges trajectory of Rodgers and Roethlisberger’s N-Score ratings:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rodgers.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25842" title="rodgers" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rodgers.png" alt="rodgers" width="402" height="128" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/roethlisberger.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25841" title="roethlisberger" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/roethlisberger.png" alt="roethlisberger" width="402" height="240" /></a></p>
<p>Throughout 2010, football continued to break TV ratings records, showing that even in a fragmented media environment, it is still possible to generate large television numbers for programming that attracts viewers in all demographics.  Nielsen cannot predict whether this year’s Super Bowl will have the largest TV audience in history, but it is all but certain to be the most-watched program of 2011.</p>
<p>For more historical information on Super Bowl viewing, please see the following historical table:</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="7">Super Bowl Viewing, 1966-2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Super Bowl</th>
<th>Season</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Avg. Number of Homes (000)</th>
<th>Avg. Number of Persons 2+ (000)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLIV</td>
<td>2009</td>
<td width="100">Feb 7, 2010*</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>51,728</td>
<td>106,476</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLIII</td>
<td>2008</td>
<td>Feb 1, 2009*</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>48,139</td>
<td>98,732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLII</td>
<td>2007</td>
<td>Feb 3, 2008*</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>43.1</td>
<td>48,665</td>
<td>97,448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XLI</td>
<td>2006</td>
<td>Feb 4 2007 *</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>42.6</td>
<td>47,505</td>
<td>93,184</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XL</td>
<td>2005</td>
<td>Feb 5 2006 *</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.6</td>
<td>45,867</td>
<td>90,745</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXIX</td>
<td>2004</td>
<td>Feb 6 2005</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>41.1</td>
<td>45,081</td>
<td>86,072</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXVIII</td>
<td>2003</td>
<td>Feb 1 2004</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>41.4</td>
<td>44,908</td>
<td>89,795</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXVII</td>
<td>2002</td>
<td>Jan 26 2003</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>40.7</td>
<td>43,433</td>
<td>88,637</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXVI</td>
<td>2001</td>
<td>Feb 3 2002</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>40.4</td>
<td>42,664</td>
<td>86,801</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXV</td>
<td>2000</td>
<td>Jan 28 2001</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>40.4</td>
<td>41,270</td>
<td>84,335</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXIV</td>
<td>1999</td>
<td>Jan 30 2000</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>43.3</td>
<td>43,618</td>
<td>88,465</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXIII</td>
<td>1998</td>
<td>Jan 31 1999</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>40.2</td>
<td>39,992</td>
<td>83,720</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXII</td>
<td>1997</td>
<td>Jan 25 1998</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>44.5</td>
<td>43,630</td>
<td>90,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXXI</td>
<td>1996</td>
<td>Jan 26 1997</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>43.3</td>
<td>42,000</td>
<td>87,870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXX</td>
<td>1995</td>
<td>Jan 28 1996</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>44,145</td>
<td>94,080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXIX</td>
<td>1994</td>
<td>Jan 29 1995</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.3</td>
<td>39,400</td>
<td>83,420</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXVIII</td>
<td>1993</td>
<td>Jan 30 1994</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>45.5</td>
<td>42,860</td>
<td>90,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXVII</td>
<td>1992</td>
<td>Jan 31 1993</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>45.1</td>
<td>41,990</td>
<td>90,990</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXVI</td>
<td>1991</td>
<td>Jan 26 1992</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>40.3</td>
<td>37,120</td>
<td>79,590</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXV</td>
<td>1990</td>
<td>Jan 27 1991</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.9</td>
<td>39,010</td>
<td>79,510</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXIV</td>
<td>1989</td>
<td>Jan 28 1990</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>35,920</td>
<td>73,852</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXIII</td>
<td>1988</td>
<td>Jan 22 1989</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>43.5</td>
<td>39,320</td>
<td>81,590</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXII</td>
<td>1987</td>
<td>Jan 31 1988</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>41.9</td>
<td>37,120</td>
<td>80,140</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XXI</td>
<td>1986</td>
<td>Jan 25 1987</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>45.8</td>
<td>40,030</td>
<td>87,190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XX</td>
<td>1985</td>
<td>Jan 26 1986</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>48.3</td>
<td>41,490</td>
<td>92,570</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XIX</td>
<td>1984</td>
<td>Jan 20 1985</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>46.4</td>
<td>39,390</td>
<td>85,530</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XVIII</td>
<td>1983</td>
<td>Jan 22 1984</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>46.4</td>
<td>38,880</td>
<td>77,620</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XVII</td>
<td>1982</td>
<td>Jan 30 1983</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>48.6</td>
<td>40,480</td>
<td>81,770</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XVI</td>
<td>1981</td>
<td>Jan 24 1982</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>49.1</td>
<td>40,020</td>
<td>85,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XV</td>
<td>1980</td>
<td>Jan 25 1981</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>44.4</td>
<td>34,540</td>
<td>68,290</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XIV</td>
<td>1979</td>
<td>Jan 20 1980</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>46.3</td>
<td>35,330</td>
<td>76,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XIII</td>
<td>1978</td>
<td>Jan 21 1979</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>47.1</td>
<td>35,090</td>
<td>74,740</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XII</td>
<td>1977</td>
<td>Jan 15 1978</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>47.2</td>
<td>34,410</td>
<td>78,940</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XI</td>
<td>1976</td>
<td>Jan 09 1977</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>44.4</td>
<td>31,610</td>
<td>62,050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>X</td>
<td>1975</td>
<td>Jan 18 1976</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>42.3</td>
<td>29,440</td>
<td>57,710</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IX</td>
<td>1974</td>
<td>Jan 12 1975</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>42.4</td>
<td>29,040</td>
<td>56,050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VIII</td>
<td>1973</td>
<td>Jan 13 1974</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>41.6</td>
<td>27,540</td>
<td>51,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VII</td>
<td>1972</td>
<td>Jan 14 1973</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>42.7</td>
<td>27,670</td>
<td>53,320</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VI</td>
<td>1971</td>
<td>Jan 16 1972</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>44.2</td>
<td>27,450</td>
<td>56,640</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>V</td>
<td>1970</td>
<td>Jan 17 1971</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>39.9</td>
<td>23,980</td>
<td>46,040</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IV</td>
<td>1969</td>
<td>Jan 11 1970</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>39.4</td>
<td>23,050</td>
<td>44,270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>III</td>
<td>1968</td>
<td>Jan 12 1969</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>20,520</td>
<td>41,660</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>II</td>
<td>1967</td>
<td>Jan 14 1968</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>36.8</td>
<td>20,610</td>
<td>39,120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>I</td>
<td>1966</td>
<td>Jan 15 1967</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>22.6</td>
<td>12,410</td>
<td>26,750</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="7">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/football-tv-ratings-soar-the-nfls-playbook-for-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Telecasts Top C3 Ratings for Week 1 of 2010-11 TV Season</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nfl-telecasts-top-c3-ratings-for-week-1-of-2010-11-tv-season/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nfl-telecasts-top-c3-ratings-for-week-1-of-2010-11-tv-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grey's Anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p18-49 ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NFL claimed the top four spots in the rankings for C3, which measures the commercials watched both live and with three days DVR playback. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Football League telecasts topped the rankings of C3 commercial ratings among persons 18-49 in the first week of the new TV season, according to data released today by The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>The NFL claimed the top four spots in the rankings for C3, which measures the commercials watched both live and with three days of DVR playback. C3 is commonly known as the metric under which much of primetime advertising is bought and sold.</p>
<p>ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Grey&#8217;s Anatomy&#8221; is the first non-sports telecast to appear on the list, coming in at #5 for the week with a 5.1 C3 rating among persons 18-49.  The show&#8217;s C3 rating was 30% higher than its live-only commercial rating. On average, the C3 rating for the top 20 shows on this list was 8% higher than its live-only commercial rating.</p>
<p>CBS&#8217;s &#8220;Hawaii Five-O&#8221; and &#8220;$#*! My Dad Says&#8221; were the season&#8217;s only two new shows to crack the top 20 in the first week. Each show&#8217;s C3 rating was 0.6 points higher than its live-only commercial rating</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6">Top C3 Ratings, Persons 18-49 &#8211; Week of 9/20/10</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>PROGRAM NAME</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>DATE OF AIR</th>
<th>LIVE+3 COMMERCIAL RATING (C3)</th>
<th>LIVE-ONLY COMMERCIAL RATING</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>FOX NFL SUNDAY-SINGLE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7.9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>CBS NFL NATIONAL</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7.7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>NBC SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6.9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>NFL MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>9/20/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5.8</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>GREY&#8217;S ANATOMY</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>9/23/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5.1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>GLEE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>9/21/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>SUNDAY NIGHT NFL PRE-KICK*</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>FAMILY GUY</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>MODERN FAMILY</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>9/22/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>CBS NFL REGIONAL</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.6</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">11</td>
<td>TWO AND A HALF MEN</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>9/20/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.5</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">12</td>
<td>DANCING WITH THE STARS</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>9/20/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.4</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">13</td>
<td>THE BIG BANG THEORY</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>9/23/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.3</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">14</td>
<td>FOOTBALL NIGHT IN AMERICA PT 3</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">15</td>
<td>OFFICE</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>9/23/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">16</td>
<td>DANCING W/STARS RESULTS</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>9/21/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">17</td>
<td>HOUSE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>9/20/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.0</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">18</td>
<td>HAWAII FIVE-0</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>9/20/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">19</td>
<td>DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>9/26/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.9</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">20</td>
<td>$#*! MY DAD SAYS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>9/23/10</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.7</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Note: Rankings for September 20-26, P18-49<br />
* &#8211; 11 minute pre-game show before Sunday Night Football</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nfl-telecasts-top-c3-ratings-for-week-1-of-2010-11-tv-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cowboys Tackle Top Spot in NFL Media Exposure Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Sports Media Scorecard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index, the Cowboys were still the most popular NFL team in America last season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as much of the country rallied around the Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints last year, it seems that the Dallas Cowboys are still America&#8217;s team.</p>
<p>According to The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index, which measures media exposure on TV and online, the Cowboys were still the most popular NFL team in America last season. Jerry Jones&#8217;s franchise earned the top indexed score of 100, far surpassing the runner-up Pittsburgh Steelers who finished with an index of 81.</p>
<p>The Cowboys&#8217; top ranking was boosted by first-place showings in two of the four categories tallied by Nielsen: gross audience during nationally televised games and monthly unique audience to the team web site. The other two categories &#8211; local team ratings and total buzz volume &#8211; were captured by the Saints and New York Giants, respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="7">NIELSEN&#8217;S NFL MEDIA EXPOSURE RANKINGS</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>TEAM</th>
<th>LOCAL TV RANK</th>
<th>NATIONAL TV RANK</th>
<th>WEBSITE/UNIQUE AUDIENCE RANK</th>
<th>ONLINE BUZZ VOLUME RANK</th>
<th>OVERALL INDEX</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td><strong>Dallas Cowboys</strong></td>
<td>8</td>
<td><em>1</em></td>
<td><em>1</em></td>
<td>2</td>
<td><strong>100</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>2</strong></td>
<td><strong>Pittsburgh Steelers</strong></td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>8</td>
<td><strong>81</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>3</strong></td>
<td><strong>New York Giants</strong></td>
<td>30</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>1</td>
<td><strong>70</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Chicago Bears</strong></td>
<td>16</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>3</td>
<td><em>5</em></td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Green Bay Packers</strong></td>
<td>5</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>11</td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>4 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Minnesota Vikings</strong></td>
<td>4</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>12</td>
<td><strong>67</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>7 </strong></td>
<td><strong>Philadelphia Eagles</strong></td>
<td>12</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>6</td>
<td><strong>66</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>8 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>Indianapolis Colts</strong></td>
<td><em>6</em></td>
<td>7</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>14</td>
<td><strong>62</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>8 (t)</strong></td>
<td><strong>New Orleans Saints</strong></td>
<td>1</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>10</td>
<td><strong>62</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>10</strong></td>
<td><strong>New England Patriots</strong></td>
<td>14</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>13</td>
<td><strong>58</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="7">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Note: Time period of data reflects the 2009-10 NFL regular season</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Dallas has held the top two spots in each of the last two years. The Steelers moved up from third to second, swapping places with the Giants. The Minnesota Vikings, aided no doubt by the presence and performance of legendary QB Brett Favre,  climbed from 13th place in 2008 to a tie for 4th in the 2009 regular season ranking. The Washington Redskins, meanwhile, dropped from 5th in 2008 to 11th in 2009.</p>
<p>NFC teams dominated the 2009 rankings. Seven of the top 10 teams  represented the conference, while the Steelers, Colts (t-8th) and Patriots (10th) were the only three AFC teams to crack the top third of the list.</p>
<p>Among the two New York teams, the Giants had the most media exposure, ranking 15 spots ahead of the Jets. And even despite drawing 38% lower local market ratings than their Bay Area rivals, the Oakland Raiders were the most popular national brand out of Northern California, ranking two spots ahead of the San Francisco 49ers (25th vs. 27th).</p>
<p>The Nielsen Sports Media Exposure Index measured all 32 NFL teams in four categories during the 2009 regular season: local team ratings, gross national TV audience, online buzz volume, and monthly unique audiences to official team websites. Teams in each category were assigned a score, with the top rank worth 100 points and each subsequent ranking assigned a lower weighted score based its distance from the top. Final team rankings were calculated using the sum of scores across all four categories, and then indexed with the highest total equaling 100.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s NFL Media Exposure Index was recently featured in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703453804575479961782758620.html" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/cowboys-tackle-top-spot-in-nfl-media-exposure-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14% Multi-tasked and Got Social on the Web During Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/14-multi-tasked-and-got-social-on-the-web-during-super-bowl/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/14-multi-tasked-and-got-social-on-the-web-during-super-bowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitasking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Convergence Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simultaneous usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fourteen percent of home Super Bowl viewers with Internet access browsed the web at least once during the big game, up slightly from last year’s 12%.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As living room debates about the best ads and plays of Sunday’s Super Bowl ensued, a virtual conversation was going on as well.</p>
<p>Fourteen percent of home Super Bowl viewers with Internet access browsed the web at least once during the big game, up slightly from last year’s 12%. Additionally, time spent on line for those multitaskers was up from 24 minutes last year to 29 minutes with much of that concurrent time was spent on social networks.</p>
<p>Overall, Google and Facebook were the most visited domains while watching the game.  Preliminary analysis of Nielsen’s single-source measurement of Internet and TV, in Convergence Panel and select National People Meter homes, shows that 36% of simultaneous users visited Google.com and 34% visited Facebook.com.  Facebook, which was visited during the game by 1 in 20 of all at-home Super Bowl viewers with Internet access, led the most-visited sites in terms of simultaneous time spent, averaging 19 minutes per user.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top Domains by Simultaneous Visitors and Time Spent</p>
<p>Super Bowl XLIV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Domain</th>
<th> % of Simultaneous</p>
<p>Visitors</th>
<th> Simultaneous Mins</p>
<p>Per Visitor</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google.com</td>
<td>36%</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Facebook.com</td>
<td>34%</td>
<td>19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo.com</td>
<td>30%</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL.com^</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>MSN.com^</td>
<td>11%</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</p>
<p>^Small base sizes; for directional purposes only</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>The growth of simultaneous use, particularly on sites such as Google and Facebook, demonstrates the growing importance of Web interactivity in the television viewing experience.  For some time, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/could-social-networking-bolster-the-30-second-spot/">Nielsen has been discussing</a> and gearing our audience measurement towards how this interactivity could make a positive impact on live television viewership. We expect to see this trend continue to manifest itself in the Winter Olympics and this summer’s FIFA World Cup Soccer event.</p>
<ul>
<li>Download  information on <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/documents/pdf/fact_sheets_ii.Par.29335.File.pdf">Nielsen’s simultaneous measurement of TV and Internet</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/14-multi-tasked-and-got-social-on-the-web-during-super-bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

