<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rochester, Buffalo, Cleveland Top Newspaper Reading Cities</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarborough Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rochester, NY, is the top U.S. city for newspaper readership, according to a new analysis of Integrated Newspaper Audience (INA) data from Scarborough Research, a partnership between Arbitron and The Nielsen Company. A higher percentage of adults in Rochester, NY, are reading newspapers in print or online than in any other U.S. market. The INA of Rochester is 87% &#8211; meaning that 87% of adults in the Rochester DMA read a printed newspaper, a newspaper&#8217;s website, or did both during the past week. Following closely behind are Cleveland, OH and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7609" title="newspaper" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="151" height="99" /></a>Rochester, NY, is the top U.S. city for newspaper readership, according to a new analysis of <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/scarboroughini.pdf">Integrated Newspaper Audience (INA) data</a> from <a href="http://www.scarborough.com" target="_blank">Scarborough Research</a>, a partnership between Arbitron and The Nielsen Company. A higher percentage of adults in Rochester, NY, are reading newspapers in print or online than in any other U.S. market. The INA of Rochester is 87% &#8211; meaning that 87% of adults in the Rochester DMA read a printed newspaper, a newspaper&#8217;s website, or did both during the past week. Following closely behind are Cleveland, OH and Buffalo, NY, each with an INA of 86%. In the 81 local markets measured by Scarborough, 75% of adults read the newspaper weekly in print or online.</p>
<p>&#8220;This data begs the question: is the constant negative news feed on the industry warranted when newspapers are actually being read by three-fourths of the adult population? When you look at audience data, it seems irrational that advertisers are leaving newspapers because the numbers speak for themselves,&#8221; said Gary Meo, senior vice president, print and digital media, Scarborough Research.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top Local Markets for Integrated Newspaper Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> DMA® %</th>
<th> %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Rochester, NY</td>
<td>87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Cleveland/Akron, OH</td>
<td>86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Buffalo, NY</td>
<td>86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pittsburgh, PA</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Hartford/New Haven, CT</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Albany/Schenectady/Troy, NY</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>New York, NY</td>
<td>84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, PA</td>
<td>84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">source: Scarborough Research</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top 10 Newspaper Websites: February 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> News Source</th>
<th> Readership</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NYTimes.com</td>
<td>20,126,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>USATODAY.com</td>
<td>13,430,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>washingtonpost.com</td>
<td>9,240,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>LA Times</td>
<td>8,421,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Wall Street Journal Online</td>
<td>6,842,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>5,659,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>New York Post</td>
<td>5,121,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Daily News Online Edition</td>
<td>4,924,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Chicago Tribune</td>
<td>4,016,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Politico</td>
<td>3,726,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">source: Nielsen Online US, Home and Work</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future Of News: Your Thoughts?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-future-of-news-your-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-future-of-news-your-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gibs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen Online analyst Jon Gibs takes a look at the news and newspaper industry in his latest post and welcomes your input.
&#8220;The economic situation we’re in has had many casualties, banks, the housing market, free soda, the works. But one of the most notable has been newspapers. I’ve posted in the past on the fate of the Christian Science Monitor, and the Rocky Mountain News has now said its goodbye as well. I think it is safe to say that these are not the end of a trend; they are ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen Online analyst <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/blog/category/jon-gibs/" target="_blank">Jon Gibs</a> takes a look at the news and newspaper industry in his <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/blog/2009/03/12/the-future-of-news-part-one/">latest post</a> and welcomes your input.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/jon_gibs.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9181" title="jon_gibs" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/jon_gibs.png" alt="" width="54" height="73" /></a>&#8220;The economic situation we’re in has had many casualties, banks, the housing market, free soda, the works. But one of the most notable has been newspapers. I’ve posted in the past on the fate of the Christian Science Monitor, and the <a title="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101256305" href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101256305">Rocky Mountain News</a> has now said its goodbye as well. I think it is safe to say that these are not the end of a trend; they are the first casualties of a much longer downward decline&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;I would like to invite all of the members of this community to post their ideas on the future of news, particularly as it is related to emerging media (i.e. not TV). I’d like to start by giving an example from the <em>New York Times</em> online.  They have provided an <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/03/10/us/20090310-immigration-explorer.html?hp" href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/03/10/us/20090310-immigration-explorer.html?hp">interactive map</a> taking a look at immigration patterns into the US over the past 120 years. What I think is impressive is that they have made this the centerpiece for ongoing online discussions among readers; they have journalists write pieces about the trends and they have op-ed writing columns. They are integrating all of the strengths a news source can provide: great data collection, objective reporting, opinion, and adding social media.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/blog/2009/03/12/the-future-of-news-part-one/">whole post</a> to submit your thoughts on the future of news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-future-of-news-your-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NeuroFocus’s Work For Frito-Lay Featured In New York Times</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/neurofocus%e2%80%99s-work-for-frito-lay-featured-in-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/neurofocus%e2%80%99s-work-for-frito-lay-featured-in-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frito-Lay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NeuroFocus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Frito-Lay wanted to increase the appeal of its calorie-conscious snacks to women &#8211; who are snacking more than men &#8211; it turned to NeuroFocus, a research company that brings neuroscience to the world of advertising, messaging, packaging and product development.  By measuring brainwaves, eye-tracking and skin conductance, researchers can, for example, determine whether a message resonates with a consumer.
In Frito-Lay&#8217;s case, NeuroFocus was enlisted by the ad agency charged with re-defining calorie-conscious snacks such as Baked Lays and 100-calorie packages to make them appeal to women.  To learn more ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/woman-chips.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8632" title="woman-chips" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/woman-chips-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>When Frito-Lay wanted to increase the appeal of its calorie-conscious snacks to women &#8211; who are snacking more than men &#8211; it turned to NeuroFocus, a research company that brings neuroscience to the world of advertising, messaging, packaging and product development.  By measuring brainwaves, eye-tracking and skin conductance, researchers can, for example, determine whether a message resonates with a consumer.</p>
<p>In Frito-Lay&#8217;s case, NeuroFocus was enlisted by the ad agency charged with re-defining calorie-conscious snacks such as Baked Lays and 100-calorie packages to make them appeal to women.  To learn more about NeuroFocus&#8217;s work on this campaign, read the New York Times article <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/business/media/25adco.html">here.</a></p>
<p>Nielsen made a strategic investment in NeuroFocus in February 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/neurofocus%e2%80%99s-work-for-frito-lay-featured-in-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology Expands, But TV Continues To Rule</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/technology-expands-but-tv-continues-to-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/technology-expands-but-tv-continues-to-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the proliferation of mobile devices and online video, television continues to capture the most viewers, according to recent Nielsen research.  But how people are watching television has evolved and it is these advances that have made TV more relevant than ever.  They aren&#8217;t necessarily &#8220;watching TV&#8221; on TV &#8211; they are increasingly likely to watch TV programs on the Internet or on their cell phones, according to an article in the The New York Times.
The average U.S. household has 2.7 people and 2.9 TVs.  For the quarter ended September ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/tv.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8073" title="tv" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/tv-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Despite the proliferation of mobile devices and online video, television continues to capture the most viewers, according to recent <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-high-tv-use-despite-onlinemobile-video-gains/">Nielsen research</a>.  But how people are watching television has evolved and it is these advances that have made TV more relevant than ever.  They aren&#8217;t necessarily &#8220;watching TV&#8221; on TV &#8211; they are increasingly likely to watch TV programs on the Internet or on their cell phones, according to an article in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/business/media/08digi.html?scp=6%26sq=nielsen%26st=cse">The New York Times</a>.</p>
<p>The average U.S. household has 2.7 people and 2.9 TVs.  For the quarter ended September 2008, the average American watched 142 hours of TV per month, an increase of five hours from the same period in 2007.  Average Internet usage also increased, to an average of 27 hours per month.</p>
<p>So how has TV managed to maintain its lead? The variety of channels available on cable and satellite is clearly one factor.  There&#8217;s a network for virtually every interest.  Second, programming produced for TV is driving growth in other channels like the Internet and mobile.  The ability to download TV shows from iTunes or stream from Hulu.com or TV network site has enabled fans to watch their favorite programs when and where they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/technology-expands-but-tv-continues-to-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In UK, Online Newspapers, Magazines See New Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/in-uk-online-newspapers-magazines-see-new-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/in-uk-online-newspapers-magazines-see-new-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC Good Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Geographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Which?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November, 10.3 million British Internet users visited at least one of the 10 most popular newspaper websites &#8212; up 23% from 8.3 million unique visitors during the same month a year ago.
Meanwhile, 5.5 million Brits visited at least one of the top 10 magazine websites &#8212; up 30% from 4.3 million unique visitors last year.
Among the top 10 newspaper websites, the Guardian&#8217;s site was most popular, drawing 3.5 million unique UK visitors in November.  The Mirror (92%), Independent (85%), and Daily Mail (65%) had the largest year-over-year growth.
Among the top 10 magazine websites, Auto Trader was easily the most popular, with 1.8 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/online_news-better-option.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6097" title="online_news-better-option" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/online_news-better-option-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>In November, 10.3 million British Internet users visited at least one of the 10 most popular newspaper websites &#8212; up 23% from 8.3 million unique visitors during the same month a year ago.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, 5.5 million Brits visited at least one of the top 10 magazine websites &#8212; up 30% from 4.3 million unique visitors last year.</p>
<p>Among the top 10 newspaper websites, the Guardian&#8217;s site was most popular, drawing 3.5 million unique UK visitors in November.  The Mirror (92%), Independent (85%), and Daily Mail (65%) had the largest year-over-year growth.</p>
<p>Among the top 10 magazine websites, Auto Trader was easily the most popular, with 1.8 million unique UK visitors.  BBC Good Food (+153%) and Radio Times (+76%) were the fastest growing online magazines among the top ten.</p>
<p><span id="more-6089"></span></p>
<p><strong>Most Popular Newspaper Websites (UK Only): November 2008</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by<br />
2008 UA)</th>
<th>Newspaper Website</th>
<th>UK Unique Audience:<br />
November 2008<br />
(000)</th>
<th>UK Unique Audience:<br />
November 2007<br />
(000)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Guardian</td>
<td>3,459</td>
<td>3,044</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Telegraph</td>
<td>3,142</td>
<td>2,563</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Times</td>
<td>2,896</td>
<td>2,041</td>
<td>42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Sun</td>
<td>2,711</td>
<td>1,895</td>
<td>43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Daily Mail</td>
<td>2,692</td>
<td>1,631</td>
<td>65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Independent</td>
<td>1,588</td>
<td>859</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Mirror</td>
<td>1,334</td>
<td>695</td>
<td>92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>New York Times</td>
<td>902</td>
<td>824</td>
<td>9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Financial Times</td>
<td>774</td>
<td>587</td>
<td>32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Metro</td>
<td>645</td>
<td>531</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2007 and November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Most Popular Magazine Websites (UK Only): November 2008</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by<br />
2008 UA) </th>
<th>Magazine Website</th>
<th>UK Unique Audience:<br />
November 2008<br />
(000)</th>
<th>UK Unique Audience:<br />
November 2007<br />
(000)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Auto Trader</td>
<td>1,847</td>
<td>1,784</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Which?</td>
<td>1,055</td>
<td>822</td>
<td>28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>BBC Good Food</td>
<td>745</td>
<td>294</td>
<td>153%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Radio Times</td>
<td>566</td>
<td>321</td>
<td>76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Time Out</td>
<td>565</td>
<td>608</td>
<td>-7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Scientific American</td>
<td>427</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>PC Advisor</td>
<td>405</td>
<td>254</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>NME</td>
<td>388</td>
<td>228</td>
<td>70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>National Geographic</td>
<td>387</td>
<td>333</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Wired</td>
<td>370</td>
<td>247</td>
<td>50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2007 and November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/Articles/40834/The+Mirror+almost+doubles+online+audience+to+13m+users.html" target="_blank">New Media Age</a>, <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/News/869511/Online-future-underscored-bumper-figures-newspapers/" target="_blank">Brand Republic</a>, and <a href="http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/News/MostEmailed/869607/Major-publishers-drive-online-user-growth/" target="_blank">MediaWeek</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/in-uk-online-newspapers-magazines-see-new-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

