<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; New Haven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/new-haven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In U.S., A Holiday Baking Divide: North Vs. South</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baking supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chanukah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollar sales index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanukkah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total dry grocery sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total U.S. sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to holiday baking, consumers in the northern U.S. reach for baking supplies &#8212; like readymade frosting, cake decorations, chocolate chips, and food coloring, while southerners prefer to stick to the basics: flour and sugar.
Last November and December, supermarket shoppers in northern markets like Hartford and New Haven, Conn. and Buffalo and Rochester, N.Y. spent almost one-third more, percentage-wise, on baking supplies than average American consumers, Nielsen reports.
During the same period, shoppers in southern markets like Birmingham, Ala. and Memphis dominated sales of flour, spending 106% and 78% more, respectively, than average Americans.
Consumers in Memphis and Birmingham also dominated sales ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cookies_gingerbread_men.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5950" title="cookies_gingerbread_men" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cookies_gingerbread_men-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>When it comes to holiday baking, consumers in the northern U.S. reach for baking supplies &#8212; like readymade frosting, cake decorations, chocolate chips, and food coloring, while southerners prefer to stick to the basics: flour and sugar.</p>
<p>Last November and December, supermarket shoppers in northern markets like Hartford and New Haven, Conn. and Buffalo and Rochester, N.Y. spent almost one-third more, percentage-wise, on baking supplies than average American consumers, Nielsen reports.</p>
<p>During the same period, shoppers in southern markets like Birmingham, Ala. and Memphis dominated sales of flour, spending 106% and 78% more, respectively, than average Americans.</p>
<p>Consumers in Memphis and Birmingham also dominated sales of sugar, spending 57% and 46% more, respectively, than average Americans on that most basic of holiday baking ingredients, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>West Texas, Little Rock, Ark., Nashville, Tenn., and Atlanta were also among the top markets for flour and sugar sales.  Shoppers in these markets spent 30% to 52% more on flour, and 19% to 28% more on sugar than average Americans.</p>
<p><span id="more-5929"></span></p>
<p><strong>Top 10 U.S. Markets: Baking Supplies</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest<br />
index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>HARTFORD/NEW HAVEN</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BUFFALO/ROCHESTER</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>GRAND RAPIDS</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MINNEAPOLIS</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>CLEVELAND</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>SYRACUSE</td>
<td>122</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>MILWAUKEE</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>ST. LOUIS</td>
<td>115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>SEATTLE</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>DETROIT</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>PHILADELPHIA</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>ALBANY</td>
<td>112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>PORTLAND</td>
<td>112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>BOSTON</td>
<td>110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>SAN FRANCISCO</td>
<td>110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SACRAMENTO</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank</em></td>
<td><em>SAN ANTONIO</em></td>
<td><em>68</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 U.S. Markets: Flour</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>BIRMINGHAM</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>MEMPHIS</td>
<td>178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>WEST TEXAS</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LITTLE ROCK</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>HOUSTON</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>NASHVILLE</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>SAN ANTONIO</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>ATLANTA</td>
<td>130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>DALLAS</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>PHOENIX</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>PORTLAND</td>
<td>105</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>NEW ORLEANS/MOBILE</td>
<td>103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>KANSAS CITY</td>
<td>103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank </em></td>
<td><em>ORLANDO </em></td>
<td><em>67</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 U.S. Markets: Sugar</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>MEMPHIS</td>
<td>157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BIRMINGHAM</td>
<td>146</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LITTLE ROCK</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>NASHVILLE</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>RALEIGH/DURHAM</td>
<td>125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>NEW ORLEANS/MOBILE</td>
<td>124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>CHARLOTTE</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>ATLANTA</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>JACKSONVILLE</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>WEST TEXAS</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>OKLAHOMA CITY/TULSA</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>LOUISVILLE</td>
<td>114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank </em></td>
<td><em>OAHU </em></td>
<td><em>68</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Sales Index reflects a category’s share of total dry grocery sales for a Nielsen market versus the total U.S., using supermarket dollar sales over the most current 52-week period.</p>
<p>The Memphis market’s index of 157 for the Sugar product category, for example, reveals that supermarkets in that particular market sell 57% more sugar, relative to total dry grocery purchases, than the national average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As U.S. Economy Slips, Coupon Clipping Climbs</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/as-the-economy-slips-coupon-clipping-climbs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/as-the-economy-slips-coupon-clipping-climbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount coupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scranton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toledo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes-Barre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coupon clipping is on the rise, according to Nielsen.
In June, a Nielsen survey of 50,000 consumers found that nearly one-third used grocery coupons once a week or more.  In December 2007, just one-fourth of those surveyed were clipping coupons at that rate, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported Thursday. 
According to a separate study by Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron, Milwaukee residents reported the highest rates of coupon clipping &#8212; 40% of all city households use grocery coupons once a week or more. 
Rochester, NY ranked second, with 38% of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/discount_coupons.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-544" style="float: left;" title="discount_coupons" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/discount_coupons-201x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>Coupon clipping is on the rise, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>In June, a Nielsen survey of 50,000 consumers found that nearly one-third used grocery coupons once a week or more.  In December 2007, just one-fourth of those surveyed were clipping coupons at that rate, the <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08234/905855-28.stm" target="_blank">Pittsburgh Post-Gazette</a> reported Thursday. </p>
<p>According to a separate study by Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron, Milwaukee residents reported the highest rates of coupon clipping &#8212; 40% of all city households use grocery coupons once a week or more. </p>
<p>Rochester, NY ranked second, with 38% of households clipping grocery coupons with this frequency, while Buffalo, NY; Toledo and Columbus, OH; Hartford and New Haven, CT; and Pittsburgh, Wilkes-Barre, and Scranton, PA, where 36% of households are regular coupons clippers, tied for third place. </p>
<p>Albuquerque and Sante Fe, NM households had the lowest rate of coupon clipping &#8212; just 14% use coupons on a regular basis, according to Scarborough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/as-the-economy-slips-coupon-clipping-climbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

