<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; NBA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/nba/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Young Adults Watch the Most TV Outside of the Home</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/young-adults-watch-the-most-tv-outside-of-the-home/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/young-adults-watch-the-most-tv-outside-of-the-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-home viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Series]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Findings released today from The Nielsen Company show that out-of-home-television in 2008 was consumed more often by young adults age 18-24.  Marquee sporting events such as the MLB World Series, the NBA Final games, as well as NFL regular season games showed the biggest draw for out-of-home television viewers, while TV programming during M-F daytime and on the weekends were watched more out-of-the-home than TV programs in other dayparts.    The findings are based on data from the Nielsen and Integrated Media Measurement Inc (IMMI) out-of-home service, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Findings released today from The Nielsen Company show that <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nielsenoutofhomeviewing.pdf">out-of-home-television</a> in 2008 was consumed more often by young adults age 18-24.  Marquee sporting events such as the MLB World Series, the NBA Final games, as well as NFL regular season games showed the biggest draw for out-of-home television viewers, while TV programming during M-F daytime and on the weekends were watched more out-of-the-home than TV programs in other dayparts.    The findings are based on data from the Nielsen and Integrated Media Measurement Inc (IMMI) out-of-home service, which captured linear television audiences outside of the home March &#8211; November 2008.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our work with IMMI shows that TV usage out of the home is a big component of video consumption, which Nielsen clients want to incorporate into their advertising negotiations.   Nielsen is continuing to explore ways to accurately measure out of home video consumption, to provide a more complete picture of how people are watching TV.  And because of the current economic conditions we are focusing our efforts on a service that will be valuable and economical to the industry,&#8221; says Marie Philippe, program manager of Out of Home measurement for The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>More at <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/esearch/e3i6c3a49109c5609b6f9e2457c55f5c456">MediaWeek</a>.</p>
<p>Read Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nielsenoutofhomeviewing.pdf">Out Of Home Viewing</a> report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/young-adults-watch-the-most-tv-outside-of-the-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL, NBA, MLB Enjoy &#8216;Game 7&#8242; Effect</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nhl-nba-mlb-enjoy-game-7-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nhl-nba-mlb-enjoy-game-7-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman doesn&#8217;t need to pick a side in tonight&#8217;s do-or-die Game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals. After all, history says that Bettman and the NHL have already won &#8211; at least when it comes to TV viewers.
The Nielsen Company looked back at the four Stanley Cup Finals match-ups that have gone the full seven games since 2000 and in each case, Game 7 was a ratings windfall. For example, games one through six of the 2006 finals between Edmonton and Carolina averaged 2.4 million viewers. Game ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman doesn&#8217;t need to pick a side in tonight&#8217;s do-or-die Game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals. After all, history says that Bettman and the NHL have already won &#8211; at least when it comes to TV viewers.</p>
<p>The Nielsen Company looked back at the four Stanley Cup Finals match-ups that have gone the full seven games since 2000 and in each case, Game 7 was a ratings windfall. For example, games one through six of the 2006 finals between Edmonton and Carolina averaged 2.4 million viewers. Game 7, however, more than doubled that figure with 5.3 million viewers.</p>
<p style="center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nhlfinals_avg.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12734" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nhlfinals_avg.png" alt="" width="513" height="322" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-12724"></span>In 2003, when the New Jersey Devils finished off the Anaheim Ducks, Game 7 was watched by 7.2 million U.S. viewers on ABC. Not only did the game attract 140% more viewers than the average of the previous six games, but it was also (and still is) the most-watched Stanley Cup Finals game since at least 1992.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Game 7&#8243; effect isn&#8217;t just limited to the NHL. When Detroit and San Antonio took the NBA Finals to the limit in 2005, Game 7 was watched by 65% more viewers than the series average to date. And in the eight MLB World Series or LCS matchups to go the full seven games, since 2000, Game 7 viewership overshadowed the rest of the series&#8217; averages each time by anywhere from 74% to 94%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nhl-nba-mlb-enjoy-game-7-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Playoffs: Where Amazing Marketing Happens</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nba-playoffs-where-amazing-marketing-happens/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nba-playoffs-where-amazing-marketing-happens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Cavaliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monitor Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRI Fusion Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On average, NBA playoff viewership is up 18% across TNT, ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC thanks in part to a pair of Conference final games. On May 26th, the Cavs and Magic pulled 10.1 million viewers in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Championship Series on TNT &#8211; the most ever for an NBA Playoff game on cable and the most-watched cable telecast of the year. And the Lakers-Nuggets&#8217; Game 4 of the Western Conference Championship Series delivered 9.7 million viewers - the most ever for a basketball game (college or pro) in ESPN&#8217;s history.


So what&#8217;s ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On average, NBA playoff viewership is up 18% across TNT, ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC thanks in part to a pair of Conference final games. On May 26th, the Cavs and Magic pulled 10.1 million viewers in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Championship Series on TNT &#8211; the most ever for an NBA Playoff game on cable and the most-watched cable telecast of the year. And the Lakers-Nuggets&#8217; Game 4 of the Western Conference Championship Series delivered 9.7 million viewers - the most ever for a basketball game (college or pro) in ESPN&#8217;s history.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12441" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nba_finals_avg.png" alt="" width="433" height="421" /></p>
<p><span id="more-12435"></span></p>
<p>So what&#8217;s driving the data? There are no doubt a multitude of factors: exciting games, compelling storylines, and perhaps even the economy. But one that may go unnoticed is the NBA&#8217;s two year old <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/NBA">advertising campaign</a>: &#8220;Where Amazing Happens.&#8221;</p>
<p>Debuting in 2007, the &#8220;Where Amazing Happens&#8221; commercial spots featured still photos of NBA action accompanied by a signature piano riff. The ads were also supplemented with internet banner ads, print and outdoor extensions and are streaming on Youtube, NBA.com and other online video sites.</p>
<p>This season, &#8220;Where Amazing Happens&#8221; commercials evolved into CGI replays of some of the most memorable moments in NBA history. By slowing down the action, the commercials highlight the drama embedded in professional basketball that may occasionally go unnoticed with the game moving at such high speeds.</p>
<p>According to Monitor-Plus, Nielsen&#8217;s advertising tracking service, the NBA ran more 30-second spots within nationally broadcast games than any other advertiser. The league used this inventory, which is negotiated into the network contracts, to promote &#8220;Where Amazing Happens&#8221; and is expecting the promotion to help increase viewership and deliver more eyeballs to its official sponsors and network advertisers.</p>
<p>Whatever the reason for the ratings renaissance, a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sportsquest_07.pdf">Nielsen Sportsquest</a> survey finds that buzz in the NBA is definitely surging. As of April 2009, interest in the NBA was at it&#8217;s highest point since July &#8216;07, with 33% of total persons aged 12+ identifying themselves as avid NBA fans. The data also revealed that NBA fan interest is spilling over to increased awareness for their sponsors: NBA fans are 50% more likely to name official wireless sponsor T-Mobile as a cell phone provider and 37% more likely to have a favorable opinion of Nike.</p>
<p>Viewership is also higher among patrons of Nike and T-Mobile. Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/mri_fusion_r2-26.pdf">MRI fusion data</a> shows that in Q4 2008, NBA viewership on TNT, ESPN, and ABC, was 47% higher among Nike Shoe wearers, and 23% higher for T-Mobile subscribers.</p>
<p>In a day and age where advertising campaigns often come and go very quickly, the NBA has stuck with &#8220;Where Amazing Happens&#8221; and its persistence looks like it&#8217;s paying off for the league and its partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nba-playoffs-where-amazing-marketing-happens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LeBron, Cavs Top Local NBA Ratings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/lebron-cavs-top-local-nba-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/lebron-cavs-top-local-nba-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Cavaliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana Pacers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans Hornets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Trailblazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Antonio Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cleveland Cavaliers were the top-rated local NBA market in the first half of the season, according to an analysis released today by The Nielsen Company.
Cleveland led all NBA markets in the U.S. with an 8.1 local household rating. It&#8217;s a significant 119% jump for LeBron James and the Cavs, which ranked 9th through the first half of last season with a 3.7 rating.
The San Antonio Spurs, who boasted the NBA&#8217;s top-rated local market last season through as recently as the first month of this season, still showed an 18% year-to-year increase in its ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cleveland Cavaliers were the top-rated local NBA market in the first half of the season, according to an analysis released today by The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>Cleveland led all NBA markets in the U.S. with an 8.1 local household rating. It&#8217;s a significant 119% jump for LeBron James and the Cavs, which ranked 9<sup>th</sup> through the first half of last season with a 3.7 rating.</p>
<p>The San Antonio Spurs, who boasted the NBA&#8217;s top-rated local market last season through <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-nba-teams-putting-up-big-local-numbers/">as recently as the first month of this season</a>, still showed an 18% year-to-year increase in its local ratings. On average, 7.9% of TV households in the San Antonio market have tuned in to see Tim Duncan &amp; Co. each game, compared to 6.7% over the same time period last year.</p>
<p>The Portland Trailblazers&#8217; first full season with Greg Oden is generating plenty of renewed interest among its fans. The Portland market ranked third through the All-Star break with a 5.6 household rating, 27% higher than the first half of last year. </p>
<p style="center;"><!-- start chart --><strong>TOP-10 LOCAL NBA MARKETS, BY HOUSEHOLD RATINGS</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>TEAM/MARKET</th>
<th>2008-09 HH RATING</th>
<th>2007-08 HH RATING</th>
<th>% CHANGE</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Cleveland</td>
<td>8.1</td>
<td>3.7</td>
<td>119%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>San Antonio</td>
<td>7.9</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Portland</td>
<td>5.6</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Utah</td>
<td>5.6</td>
<td>6.3</td>
<td>-11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>L.A. Lakers</td>
<td>4.7</td>
<td>4.2</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston</td>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Detroit</td>
<td>3.8</td>
<td>5.6</td>
<td>-32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Phoenix</td>
<td>3.8</td>
<td>5.0</td>
<td>-24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Houston</td>
<td>2.6</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td>2.6</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">source: The Nielsen Company 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>            Other local market highlights in the NBA this year:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Indiana Pacers showed the most year-to-year ratings increase through the All-Star break. The Pacers have tripled their ratings from 0.6 last year to 1.8 this year. New Orleans &#8211; led by superstar Chris Paul &#8211; saw its ratings climb 160%.</li>
<li>The NBA&#8217;s two largest markets &#8211; New York and Los Angeles &#8211; have maintained the growth trend that was started earlier this year. The Knicks are up 18%, while the Lakers are up 12% and the Clippers are up 43%.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/lebron-cavs-top-local-nba-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Provides Key Assists To TV Advertisers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nba-provides-key-assists-to-tv-advertisers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nba-provides-key-assists-to-tv-advertisers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan bases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NBA may not draw the highest ratings for nationally televised games, but it&#8217;s second only to the NFL in delivering their core fans to the TV sets, according to a new study from Nielsen PreView.
The study, which analyzed viewership data for some of America&#8217;s favorite sports, uncovered that while Major League Baseball and NBA pull in comparable audiences for nationally televised broadcast, when compared to the actual fan base in the United States, the NBA significantly outperformed most of its peers; NBA games were able to get 7.8% of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/basketball.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" />The NBA may not draw the highest ratings for nationally televised games, but it&#8217;s second only to the NFL in delivering their core fans to the TV sets, according to a <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1117" target="_blank">new study</a> from Nielsen PreView.</p>
<p>The study, which analyzed viewership data for some of America&#8217;s favorite sports, uncovered that while Major League Baseball and NBA pull in comparable audiences for nationally televised broadcast, when compared to the actual fan base in the United States, the NBA significantly outperformed most of its peers; NBA games were able to get 7.8% of its fans, on average, to sit down and view the broadcast.</p>
<p>The study also highlighted the strength of engagement for the sports.  NFL fans, on average, watch over an hour of each televised football event; this was the only sport of the four to have over an hour of engagement per televised event.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1117" target="_blank">full study</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nba-provides-key-assists-to-tv-advertisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPORTS WRAP: NBA Teams Putting Up Big Local Numbers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-nba-teams-putting-up-big-local-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-nba-teams-putting-up-big-local-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Cavaliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Trailblazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Antonio Spurs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=4876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than a month into watching the NBA season, Nielsen has spotted some noticeable trends, including several teams outscoring last year&#8217;s ratings in their local markets. While the San Antonio Spurs are still the highest-rated NBA team  with a 6.8 Average Household Rating in their market, the Cleveland Cavaliers and Portland Trailblazers are close behind, thanks to large increases in viewership compared to this time period last season.
NBA Local Ratings Box Score

The New Orleans Hornets ratings  are up 163% compared to a year ago, thanks  in large part ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4884" title="basketball" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/basketball.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Less than a month into watching the NBA season, Nielsen has spotted some noticeable trends, including several teams outscoring last year&#8217;s ratings in their local markets. While the San Antonio Spurs are still the highest-rated NBA team  with a 6.8 Average Household Rating in their market, the Cleveland Cavaliers and Portland Trailblazers are close behind, thanks to large increases in viewership compared to this time period last season.</p>
<h4>NBA Local Ratings Box Score</h4>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li>The <a href="http://www.nba.com/hornets/">New Orleans Hornets</a> ratings  are up 163% compared to a <span class="318183119-20112008">year ago</span>, thanks  in large part to <span class="318183119-20112008">last year&#8217;s come-from-nowhere  victory of their division</span>.</li>
<li>In <a href="http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/">Cleveland</a>, fans witnessed the  high flying Lebron James lead the <a href="http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/">Cavs</a> to an <span class="318183119-20112008">eight-</span>game winning streak, <span class="318183119-20112008">which fueled a</span>109% lift in ratings from last  season.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nba.com/hawks">Atlanta</a> and <a href="http://www.nba.com/blazers/">Portland</a>, two teams loaded with young  talent, have captured the attention of their markets, with a 97% and 44%  increase in their local ratings respectively.</li>
<li>In <a href="http://www.nba.com/magic/">Orlando</a>, Dwight Howard and the <a href="http://www.nba.com/magic/">Magic</a> are atop their division, and are also  enjoying a 26% boost in viewership compared to last season.</li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.nba.com/knicks/">New York Knicks</a> and <a href="http://www.nba.com/lakers/">Los Angeles Lakers</a>, <span class="318183119-20112008">who benefit from the </span>nation<span class="318183119-20112008">&#8216;</span>s two largest markets, are also outperforming  last season, with 17% and 14% increases.</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-4876"></span></p>
<h3>Top 10 Local Ratings 2008-09 Season</h3>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Team</th>
<th> Avg. Local HH Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>San Antonio</td>
<td>6.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cleveland</td>
<td>6.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Portland</td>
<td>5.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Utah</td>
<td>4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>L.A. Lakers</td>
<td>4.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Detroit</td>
<td>4.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Phoenix</td>
<td>4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Boston</td>
<td>3.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Houston</td>
<td>3.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td>2.9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>2008-09 Season vs. 2007-08 Season Ratings % Change</h3>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Team</th>
<th> % Change vs. YAGO</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>New Orleans</td>
<td>163%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cleveland</td>
<td>109%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Atlanta</td>
<td>97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Portland</td>
<td>44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Orlando</td>
<td>26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>New York</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>L.A. Lakers</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Washington</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philadelphia</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Memphis</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-nba-teams-putting-up-big-local-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
