<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; MySpace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/myspace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social Media: The Next Great Gateway for Content Discovery?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-the-next-great-gateway-for-content-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-the-next-great-gateway-for-content-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gibs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust in advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media has not only changed the way consumers communicate and gather on the Web, but also impacted content discovery and navigation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Jon Gibs, VP Media Analytics</strong></em></p>
<p>In the beginning there were ISPs, which then gave way to portals ― aggregators of content and links ― which then led to the rise of &#8220;search&#8221; as the dominant form of Internet navigation or, how we get to where we we’re going on the web. However, as with most forms of evolution, change is constant, and over the past two years search navigation has appeared to shift to social media.</p>
<p>We continue to see that social media has not only changed the way consumers communicate and gather on the Web, but also impacted content discovery and navigation in a big way. But how? Is social media taking the place of portals and search as the hub of online navigation?</p>
<p>These questions led to some in-depth research – including an online panel survey of 1,800 participants fielded in August 2009 – in which we looked at three main consumer segments using search (Searchers), portals (Portalists) or social media (Socializers) as their primary vehicle for content discovery.</p>
<p><strong>What We Found</strong><br />
In a nutshell, there is a segment of the online population that uses social media as a core navigation and information discovery tool &#8212; roughly 18 percent of users see it as core to  finding new information. While still a smaller percentage than those who use search engines or portals like Yahoo! or MSN, it is a significant figure. And as social media usage continues to increase (unique visitors to Twitter.com increased 959% YOY in August) I can only expect this figure to grow.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/content_start.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16554" title="content_start" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/content_start.png" alt="content_start" width="550" height="345" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The appeal of Social Media</strong><br />
At the root of the changing nature of content discovery is the sheer amount of information that is available on the Web. If you want to learn more about the latest smartphone released into the market, your favorite search engine is sure to provide you with hundreds, if not thousands, of articles about the device. But with the increasing number of resources available, it’s difficult to know what you should believe or take at face value. Socializers – those who spend 10 percent or more of their online time on social media – feel this effect more than others do. When asked, 26 percent feel that there is too much information available on the Internet, compared to 18 percent of people who predominantly use portals and just 5 percent of people who primarily use search engines.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/TMI.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16558" title="TMI" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/TMI.png" alt="TMI" width="482" height="295" /></a></p>
<p>But why does too much information lead one to use social media as a navigation tool? The short answer: Socializers trust what their friends have to say and social media acts as an information filtration tool. This is key because Socializers gravitate towards and believe what is shared with friends and family. If your friend creates or links to the content, then you are more likely to believe it and like it. And this thought plays out in the data.</p>
<p>We saw the power of opinions posted online in our global study earlier this year about <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/online-advertising-has-work-to-do-to-elicit-consumer-trust/">trust in advertising</a>, and the point came up again in our recent findings. Social media is becoming a core product research channel. Almost 15 percent of Socializers most trusted information they found on blogs when researching new purchases online, while nearly 20 percent trusted most the information they found on message boards.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/trustedsource1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16557" title="trustedsource" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/trustedsource1.png" alt="trustedsource" width="550" height="306" /></a></p>
<p>So are social networks replacing portals or search engines? Perhaps. Regardless, if we don’t understand and address people feeling increasingly alienated by the amount of information on the Internet, and  the need for a human guide, yes, your favorite social network (or something like it) will become the next great content gateway.</p>
<p>For more, join me for our webinar <a href="https://www106.livemeeting.com/lrs/8000012213/Registration.aspx?pageName=t4q4pfn9t3m6w305">The Evolution of Content Discovery</a> on Tuesday, October 6 (2PM ET)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-the-next-great-gateway-for-content-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Social Media Impacting How Much We Email?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/is-social-media-impacting-how-much-we-email/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/is-social-media-impacting-how-much-we-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If social media and social networks are these all-powerful game changers, shouldn’t they eventually make a newsworthy impact on email, the internet's original "killer app?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Jon Gibs, VP, Media Analytics</em></strong></p>
<p>In the past, we discussed ways that social media has transformed the internet, having been so bold to say that social networks fundamentally changed the way we consume online media. So, if social media and social networks are these all-powerful game changers, shouldn’t they eventually make a newsworthy impact on email, the internet&#8217;s original &#8220;killer app?&#8221;</p>
<p>We decided to churn some quick data to test our hypothesis that “Consumption of social media decreases email use.” First, we broke the online population into four groups. The first three are terciles of social media consumption in minutes. The fourth is a group that doesn&#8217;t use social media at all.  We then looked at each segment&#8217;s time of web based email consumption over the course of a year. Finally, we subtracted the email consumption of those that do not use social media from those that do, basically to show a lift over possible external forces. Clearly, there are more robust approaches that could be taken (controlling for factors other than consumption for example) but for the sake of this simple experiment, we tried to keep it straightforward.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what we found:<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/social_media_email.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16222" title="social media email usage" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/social_media_email.png" alt="social media email usage" width="548" height="323" /></a></p>
<p>At least from this small experiment our hypothesis was disproved, but interesting nonetheless.  It  actually appears that social media use makes people consume email <em>more</em>, not  less, as we had originally assumed – particularly for the highest social media  users. Intuitively this makes some sense.  Social media sites like Facebook send  messages to your inbox every time someone comments on your posting or something  you&#8217;ve participated in, and depending on your settings, can send updates on  almost every activity.  Also, it&#8217;s perfectly logical that as people make  connections though social media, they maintain those connections outside of the  specific platform and may extend those connections to email, a phone  conversation or even in-person meetings.</p>
<p>This modest kitchen sink  experiment further stoked our curiosity; the next step is to take a more robust  approach to develop correlations between platforms to understand if this  relationship is different across specific demographics and behavioral groups –  rather than by levels of consumption.</p>
<p>If you have other  theories or questions, we&#8217;d love to see your comments or questions below. Of  course, you can contact us by <a href="mailto:nielsenwire@nielsen.com">email</a> or social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/is-social-media-impacting-how-much-we-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The More Affluent and More Urban are More Likely to use Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-more-affluent-and-more-urban-are-more-likely-to-use-social-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-more-affluent-and-more-urban-are-more-likely-to-use-social-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claritas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re in the U.S. and are using a social network like Facebook, Myspace or LinkedIn, chances are you’re more affluent and more urban than the average American.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re in the U.S. and are using a social network like Facebook, MySpace or LinkedIn, chances are you&#8217;re more affluent and more urban than the average American according to <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/tab/product_families/nielsen_claritas">Nielsen Claritas</a>, which provides in-depth segmentation analysis of consumer behavior.</p>
<p>&#8220;Nielsen&#8217;s online data shows that about half of the U.S. population visited a social networking website in the last year and that number grows every quarter,&#8221; said Wils Corrigan, AVP, Research &amp; Development, Nielsen Claritas. &#8220;The rising popularity of these sites and the deep engagement consumers have with them has advertisers and marketers asking for more and more detail as to which lifestyles should be targeted for their online advertising and promotions.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Facebook vs Myspace</h3>
<p>Through Claritas, Nielsen defines U.S. households in terms of <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/documents/pdf/fact_sheets.Par.69269.File.dat/Nielsen%20Claritas%20PRIZM%20Brochure.pdf">66 demographically and behaviorally distinct segments</a> like &#8220;Young Digerati&#8221; or &#8220;Beltway Boomers.&#8221;  When those segments are overlaid with the activity of Nielsen&#8217;s online panel of more than 200K, we see a marked difference in the demographic makeup of the two largest social networks, Facebook and MySpace.</p>
<ul>
<li>Facebook users have a largely upscale profile. The top third of lifestyle segments relative to affluence were 25% more likely to use Facebook than those in the lower third.</li>
<li>The bottom third segments related to affluence are 37% more likely to use MySpace than those in the top third.</li>
<li>Users of Facebook were also much more likely to use LinkedIn, a network geared towards business and professional networking, than those who use MySpace.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bloggers more urban as well</h3>
<p>According to Nielsen Claritas, the blogging and tweeting community at large isn’t necessarily more affluent, but bloggers and tweeters do live in more urban areas such as New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago. The penetration rates of the top two most visited blogging platforms (Blogger, Wordpress) and the most popular micro-blogging platform (Twitter) show that Nielsen’s 12 Urban lifestyle segments are more likely to blog and tweet than Nielsen’s 22 Town &amp; Rural segments.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly those lifestyle segments most likely to blog and tweet also tend to use Facebook and LinkedIn more often than those segments that typically don’t blog or tweet. Case in point, the Urban lifestyle segments for Blogger are 18% more likely to be Facebook users and 140% more likely to be LinkedIn users than the below average segments.</p>
<h3>About the methodology</h3>
<p>Nielsen examined the seven most-visited social networking websites and platforms:  Facebook, MySpace, Blogger, Twitter, WordPress, ClassmatesOnline, and LinkedIn.  Website penetration by segment was calculated by dividing the number of unique visitors to the website per segment by the total number of households in each segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-more-affluent-and-more-urban-are-more-likely-to-use-social-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networking and Blog Sites Capture More Internet Time and Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-networking-and-blog-sites-capture-more-internet-time-and-advertisinga/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-networking-and-blog-sites-capture-more-internet-time-and-advertisinga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gibs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans have nearly tripled the amount of time they spend at social networking and blog sites such as Facebook and MySpace from a year ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans have nearly tripled the amount of time they spend at social networking and blog sites such as Facebook and MySpace from a year ago, according to a new report from The Nielsen Company.  In August 2009, 17 percent of all time spent on the Internet was at social networking sites, up from 6 percent in August 2008.</p>
<p>&#8220;This growth suggests a wholesale change in the way the Internet is used,&#8221; said Jon Gibs, vice president, media and agency insights, Nielsen&#8217;s online division. &#8220;While video and text content remain central to the Web experience – the desire of online consumers to connect, communicate and share is increasingly driving the medium’s growth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Among those taking note of this trend: advertisers.  Estimated online advertising spending on the top social network and blogging sites increased 119 percent, from approximately $49 million in August 2008 to approximately $108 million in August 2009 – all despite a recession. Share of estimated spend on these sites has doubled, from 7 percent of online ad spend in 2008 to 15 percent in 2009.</p>
<p><strong>Year-over-Year Percent Change in Online Ad Spend by Industry (U.S., August 2009)</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>Estimated Spend on Top Social Network Sites</th>
<th></th>
<th>Year-over-Year Percent Growth</th>
<th></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Industry</td>
<td>Aug-08</td>
<td>Aug-09</td>
<td>On Social Network Sites*</td>
<td>On All Sites</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Entertainment</td>
<td>$1,097,700</td>
<td>$10,012,800</td>
<td>812%</td>
<td>40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Travel</td>
<td>$473,700</td>
<td>$2,198,200</td>
<td>364%</td>
<td>-11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Business to Business</td>
<td>$683,400</td>
<td>$1,941,700</td>
<td>184%</td>
<td>-8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Automotive</td>
<td>$1,110,200</td>
<td>$3,085,800</td>
<td>178%</td>
<td>-26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Health</td>
<td>$1,131,500</td>
<td>$2,754,900</td>
<td>143%</td>
<td>8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Media</td>
<td>$11,231,800</td>
<td>$26,855,700</td>
<td>139%</td>
<td>30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Software</td>
<td>$526,400</td>
<td>$1,202,500</td>
<td>128%</td>
<td>-29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Financial Services</td>
<td>$3,233,900</td>
<td>$6,415,900</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>-10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Public Services</td>
<td>$6,836,500</td>
<td>$13,203,100</td>
<td>93%</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Telecommunications</td>
<td>$12,449,500</td>
<td>$23,550,300</td>
<td>89%</td>
<td>-1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Consumer Goods</td>
<td>$1,913,400</td>
<td>$3,349,200</td>
<td>75%</td>
<td>8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hardware &amp; Electronics</td>
<td>$654,000</td>
<td>$1,022,900</td>
<td>56%</td>
<td>-47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Retail Goods &amp; Services</td>
<td>$8,101,400</td>
<td>$12,556,800</td>
<td>55%</td>
<td>-12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*<em>Estimated spend on social networking sites is based off of data for the top ad-supported member community sites ranked by unique visitors in August 2009</em><br />
Read the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/InternetSpend_SocialNetworks.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-networking-and-blog-sites-capture-more-internet-time-and-advertisinga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Stats: Myspace Music Growing, Twitter&#8217;s Big Move</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Myspace.com continues its strategic move toward becoming an &#8220;entertainment portal,&#8221; the growth to Myspace Music should help cement their presence in this space. Since the site&#8217;s launch in September 2008, unique visitors to the music.myspace.com subdomain have increased 190 percent &#8212; growing from 4.2 million unique visitors to 12.1 million in June 2009. Year-over-year  traffic to the URL has increased 1,017 percent.
When comparing unique visitors of the music.myspace.com subdomain to other sites within the music category in June, it ranked third behind AOL Music and Yahoo! Music and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Myspace.com continues its strategic move toward becoming an &#8220;entertainment portal,&#8221; the growth to Myspace Music should help cement their presence in this space. Since the site&#8217;s launch in September 2008, unique visitors to the music.myspace.com subdomain have increased 190 percent &#8212; growing from 4.2 million unique visitors to 12.1 million in June 2009. Year-over-year  traffic to the URL has increased 1,017 percent.</p>
<p>When comparing unique visitors of the music.myspace.com subdomain to other sites within the music category in June, it ranked third behind AOL Music and Yahoo! Music and ahead of  popular music sites like MTV Networks Music and Pandora.com.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/musicportals.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13679" title="musicportals" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/musicportals.png" alt="" width="500" height="276" /></a></p>
<p>People between the ages of 12 and 17 were 2.4 time more likely than the average active Internet user to visit music.myspace.com. Visitors between 18 and 24 were 2.2 more likely than the average Internet user to visit the site in June.</p>
<p><span id="more-13678"></span></p>
<p>On the video streaming front, with 120.1 million total streams, Myspace.com was the No. 1 social media site when ranked by streams for June 2009. It was also the No. 1 social networking site when ranked by unique viewers of video content, with 12.9 million viewers for the month. Facebook was the fastest growing social media site by both total video streams and unique viewers of video. Total streams increased 434 percent year-over-year, from 10.1 million streams to 54 million streams. Unique viewers of video increased 397 percent, from 2.4 million in June 2008 to 12 million in June 2009.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/video_streams.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13689" title="video_streams" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/video_streams.png" alt="" width="500" height="166" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/myspace_demo.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13681" title="myspace_demo" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/myspace_demo.png" alt="" width="500" height="246" /></a></p>
<h3>Twitter&#8217;s Big Move</h3>
<p>Among the top 10 social media sites, Twitter.com was again the fastest growing, increasing 1,928 percent year-over-year, from 1 million unique visitors in June 2008 to 21 million unique visitors in June 2009&#8211;making Twitter the fourth most visited member communities site in June. Facebook continued to lead as the No. 1 U.S. social networking site for the sixth month in a row, with 87.3 million unique visitors in June 2009.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/topsites_june09.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13682" title="topsites_june09" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/topsites_june09.png" alt="" width="500" height="343" /></a></p>
<h3>Facebook No. 1 For Time Spent</h3>
<p>Facebook was also the No. 1 social networking site among the top 10 when ranked by average time per person, with visitors spending an average of 4 hours and 33 minutes on the site in June. This is a 240 percent year-over-year increase. The average time per person on Twitter increased 522 percent year-over-year, from 5 minutes and 2 seconds in June 2008 to 31 minutes and 17 seconds in June 2009, making it the fastest growing by time per person among the top 10.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timespent_june091.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13688" title="timespent_june091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timespent_june091.png" alt="" width="500" height="355" /></a></p>
<p><strong>*Note:</strong> <em>Effective with June 2009 data reporting, Nielsen has made several <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-launches-expanded-web-measurement-panel/">enhancements</a> to the NetView and VideoCensus services, including a panel that is 8 times larger, more granular reporting and improved accuracy and representativeness. These enhancements provide the highest quality data to our clients and the marketplace. For some sites, trending of previously-reported data with current results may show percentage differences attributable to these product enhancements and should only be compared directionally.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Long Tail of the Net &#8211; Just How Important is it?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Buchwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Buchwalter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &#38; Analytics
There has been much talk in the Internet industry around the importance of the &#8220;long tail&#8221; (niche content and service-oriented sites) and how consumers gravitate to it.  The central concept is that people tend to be most engaged in content that is core to their specific interests, rather than more generalized content.
Looking at our newly expanded panel that includes more than 30,000 sites, we have found that short tail sites (those with a greater than 1 percent reach) remain the most engaging ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &amp; Analytics</strong></em><br />
There has been much talk in the Internet industry around the importance of the &#8220;long tail&#8221; (niche content and service-oriented sites) and how consumers gravitate to it.  The central concept is that people tend to be most engaged in content that is core to their specific interests, rather than more generalized content.</p>
<p>Looking at our newly expanded panel that includes more than 30,000 sites, we have found that short tail sites (those with a greater than 1 percent reach) remain the most engaging brands online.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1178" title="jongibs_longtail1_0713091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jongibs_longtail1_0713091.bmp" alt="jongibs_longtail1_0713091" /></p>
<p>It seems that the differentiation between the long tail and short tail is important. Long tail sites tend to have lower engagement levels than short tail sites. <span id="more-14346"></span></p>
<p>However, it would be reasonable to ask: &#8220;well, since not all short tail sites are the same, what happens to those numbers if you remove portals and large social networks?&#8221; The answer is interesting. When we look at the data in relation to the highest traffic sites on the Web (e.g., Google, Yahoo!, YouTube, MySpace, Wikipedia, Apple and Facebook) here&#8217;s what happens:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1177" title="jongibs_longtail2_0713091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jongibs_longtail2_0713091.bmp" alt="jongibs_longtail2_0713091" /></p>
<p>Long tail sites tend to have lower engagement levels than short tail sites; however, the largest jump isn&#8217;t between long tail and short tail, it is really between everyone and the top 10 sites.</p>
<p>What does this amount to? As much as anyone thinks the future is in the long tail, it&#8217;s just not the case-at least not yet. In fact, consumers feel more comfortable on large, mass media sites. We know the Internet is changing. We know there are more blogs, boards, tweets and social networks than ever before. But what&#8217;s also clear is that while the Internet itself is fragmenting (like all other media), people continue to spend their time on the sites that offer them the most options and functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record Buzz for Jackson Showcases Increased Media Integration</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-buzz-for-jackson-signifies-increased-media-integration/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-buzz-for-jackson-signifies-increased-media-integration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three screen report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Jackson&#8217;s death and related events has drawn the most online buzz in Internet history.  News of his death on June 25 broke daily records, capturing nearly 8 percent of all conversations on the web.  Buzz surrounding Jackson&#8217;s July 7 public memorial (which drew 31.1 million TV viewers) ranks as the third most-discussed topic online ever at more than 3 percent of conversations and early data for July 8 indicates that yesterday&#8217;s traffic record may already be eclipsed by today&#8217;s ongoing discussion.  The one other event to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Jackson&#8217;s death and related events has drawn the most online buzz in Internet history.  News of his death on June 25 broke daily records, capturing nearly 8 percent of all conversations on the web.  Buzz surrounding Jackson&#8217;s July 7 public memorial (which drew 31.1 million TV viewers) ranks as the third most-discussed topic online ever at more than 3 percent of conversations and early data for July 8 indicates that yesterday&#8217;s traffic record may already be eclipsed by today&#8217;s ongoing discussion.  The one other event to see this level of discussion was the inauguration of President Obama with roughly 5 percent of all online discussion.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/2009_buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13429" title="2009_buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/2009_buzz.png" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>As fans discussed the emotional and musical details of the memorial, the media coverage and the integration between television and the internet was also a major topic. Nearly 15% of all online discussions about Jackson referenced either a broadcast or social network.</p>
<p><span id="more-13423"></span>CNN which teamed up with Facebook on streaming coverage was named in 5% of all online conversations. Also on the TV network side, BET came in 2nd with 1.9%, ABC with 1.7%, MTV with 1.44%, NBC/MSNBC with 1.43%, Fox with 1.38% and CBS with 1.0%. Among social networks, Twitter was the most discussed social networking site with 2.4%. Facebook was mentioned in 2% of the conversations, followed by Youtube (1.9%) Myspace (0.6%) and Hulu (0.3%) which streamed FOX News coverage.</p>
<p>&#8220;While events like the Jackson memorial, or the Obama inauguration are unique, the way consumers are multitasking between media is quickly becoming the norm,&#8221; says Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &amp; Analytics, Nielsen Online. &#8220;Even as recently as five years ago, the only choice for community was to gather around the TV screen with co-workers or friends for major events. Now, there are three screens to choose from and, as our research shows, online activity actually reinforces TV viewing. So when outlets like CNN integrate their coverage with Facebook or MSNBC leans heavily on Twitter it demonstrates the public’s growing integrated use of TV, the web, and mobile for getting, and at times reporting, the news.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Twitter Doesn&#8217;t Fail Tweeters</h3>
<p>Terms and tags such as #MJ and #Michael Jackson dominated the top trends on Twitter.com yesterday, July 7, 2009. Interestingly, even the misspelling of the King of Pop’s first name as “micheal” also topped trends throughout the day.</p>
<p>Users watch the events of the day unfold on TV and online, often “tweeting” about the coverage offered by various media outlets. Since many were limited to watching coverage online while at work, Twitter featured frequent links and recommendations for live video feeds, most commonly CNN’s live feed with Facebook integration, followed by CBS News/Ustream, MSN, and MSNBC.</p>
<p>During the memorial service, recommendations and links to video stream slowed down, and viewers began to focus more of their “tweets” on the performances at the service, only distracted by news that social media sites Facebook.com and Twitter.com were out of capacity and/or had crashed. However, CNN.com did continue to be the most recommended live feed during programming. Following programming, recommendations shifted to video recordings posted on YouTube.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-buzz-for-jackson-signifies-increased-media-integration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Grows 1,444% Over Last Year; Time on Site Up 175%</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/twitter-grows-1444-over-last-year-time-on-site-up-175/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/twitter-grows-1444-over-last-year-time-on-site-up-175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 2009 data from Nielsen Online shows that people continue to spend more time on social networking and blog sites than ever before, with total minutes increasing 82 percent year-over-year and the average time per person increasing 67 percent year-over-year in May 2009. Twitter.com was the fastest-growing Web brand in May 2009, increasing 1,448 percent year over- year, from 1.2 million unique visitors in May 2008 to 18.2 million in 2009. Despite being the fastest-growing brand year-over-year, Twitter&#8217;s month-over-month growth has begun to slow, increasing 7 percent from April. The ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nielsen_pr_090619.pdf">May 2009 data</a> from Nielsen Online shows that people continue to spend more time on social networking and blog sites than ever before, with total minutes increasing 82 percent year-over-year and the average time per person increasing 67 percent year-over-year in May 2009. Twitter.com was the fastest-growing Web brand in May 2009, increasing 1,448 percent year over- year, from 1.2 million unique visitors in May 2008 to 18.2 million in 2009. Despite being the fastest-growing brand year-over-year, Twitter&#8217;s month-over-month growth has begun to slow, increasing 7 percent from April. The average time per person on Twitter increased 175 percent year-over-year, from 6 minutes and 19 seconds in May 2008 to 17 minutes and 21 seconds in May 2009. However, month-over-month growth was flat, decreasing one percent from April 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/twitter_time.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12946" title="twitter_time" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/twitter_time.png" alt="" width="500" height="268" /></a></p>
<h3>Facebook and Myspace Stats</h3>
<ul>
<li>With 144.3 million unique visitors, Facebook was the No. 1 global social networking destination in May 2009—the 7th month in a row that Facebook has ranked No. 1</li>
<li>May 2009 also marked the 5th month in a row that Facebook has been the No. 1 social<br />
networking site in the U.S., garnering 75.4 million unique visitors—a 190 percent increase<br />
over May 2008</li>
<li>Myspace.com continued as the top social networking site when ranked by total video<br />
streams in May, with 116.1 million video streams</li>
<li>Unique viewers of video content at Myspace.com increased 22.9 percent month-over-month,<br />
from 9.9 million in April 2009 to 12.2 million in May 2009.</li>
</ul>
<p>Download Nielsen Online&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nielsen_pr_090619.pdf">May 2009 data</a> on social networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/twitter-grows-1444-over-last-year-time-on-site-up-175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen&#8217;s Jon Gibs Discusses Social Networking with Fox Business</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-jon-gibs-discusses-social-networking-with-fox-business/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-jon-gibs-discusses-social-networking-with-fox-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 4, Jon Gibs, Vice President, Media and Agency Insights, Nielsen Online, discussed stickiness, the social networking ecosystem, and online advertising with Fox Business.

 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 4, Jon Gibs, Vice President, Media and Agency Insights, Nielsen Online, discussed stickiness, the social networking ecosystem, and online advertising with Fox Business.</p>
<div align="center">
<p id="gibsfox"><script src="/nielsenwire/videos/swfobject.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript"><!--
var s1 = new SWFObject('/nielsenwire/videos/player.swf','player','400','300','9');
s1.addParam('allowfullscreen','false');
s1.addParam('allowscriptaccess','always');
s1.addParam('flashvars','file=/nielsenwire/videos/gibs_on_fox.flv&#038;image=/nielsenwire/videos/nielsen_video_tn.png');
s1.write('gibsfox');
// --></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-jon-gibs-discusses-social-networking-with-fox-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Spent on Facebook up 700%, but MySpace Still Tops for Video</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-on-facebook-up-700-but-myspace-still-tops-for-video/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-on-facebook-up-700-but-myspace-still-tops-for-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three screen report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As theories circulate about the actual dollar value of sites like Facebook and Myspace-analysts recently placed Facebook&#8217;s worth at $10 billion-there is no question that people continue to gravitate in droves towards social networking and blog sites. In the U.S. alone,  total minutes spent on social networking sites has increased 83 percent year-over-year. In fact, total minutes spent on Facebook increased nearly 700 percent year-over-year, growing from 1.7 billion minutes in April 2008 to 13.9 billion in April 2009, making it the No. 1 social networking site when ranked ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As theories circulate about the actual dollar value of sites like Facebook and Myspace-analysts recently placed Facebook&#8217;s worth at $10 billion-there is no question that people continue to gravitate in droves towards social networking and blog sites. In the U.S. alone,  total minutes spent on social networking sites has increased 83 percent year-over-year. In fact, total minutes spent on Facebook increased nearly 700 percent year-over-year, growing from 1.7 billion minutes in April 2008 to 13.9 billion in April 2009, making it the No. 1 social networking site when ranked by total minutes for the month.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have seen some very exciting growth in Facebook during the past year, and a subsequent decline in MySpace.  Twitter has come on the scene in an explosive way perhaps changing the outlook for the entire space.  The one thing that is clear about social networking is that regardless of how fast a site is growing, or a how big it is, it can quickly fall out of favor with consumers,&#8221; said Jon Gibs, vice president, media and agency insights, Nielsen Online. &#8220;Remember Friendster?  Remember when MySpace was an unbeatable force?  Neither Facebook nor Twitter are immune.  Consumers have shown that they are willing to pick up their networks and move them to another platform, seemingly at a moment&#8217;s notice.&#8221;</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Top 10 Social Networking and Blog Sites Ranked by Total Minutes for April 2009 and Their Year-over-Year Percent Growth (U.S., Home and Work)</h3>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Site</th>
<th> Apr-08 Total Minutes (000)</th>
<th> Apr-09 Total Minutes (000)</th>
<th> Year-over-Year<br />
% Growth</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>1,735,698</td>
<td>13,872,640</td>
<td>699</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Myspace.com</td>
<td>7,254,645</td>
<td>4,973,919</td>
<td>-31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Blogger</td>
<td>448,710</td>
<td>582,683</td>
<td>30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Tagged.com</td>
<td>29,858</td>
<td>327,871</td>
<td>998</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Twitter.com</td>
<td>7,865</td>
<td>299,836</td>
<td>3712</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>MyYearbook</td>
<td>131,105</td>
<td>268,565</td>
<td>105</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>LiveJournal</td>
<td>54,671</td>
<td>204,121</td>
<td>273</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>LinkedIn</td>
<td>119,636</td>
<td>202,407</td>
<td>69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>SlashKey</td>
<td>N/A</td>
<td>187,687</td>
<td>N/A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Gaia Online</td>
<td>173,115</td>
<td>143,909</td>
<td>-17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --><br />
<span id="more-12285"></span></p>
<h3>Myspace Visitors Love Videos&#8211;Make it No. 1 Social Networking Site when Ranked by Video Streams</h3>
<p>While the popular consensus is that Facebook has become the top dog in the social networking space-April was the fourth month in a row that Facebook held the top spot in both unique visitors and total minutes-Myspace has been winning in one arena: online video. With 120.8 million video streams, Myspace.com was the No. 1 social networking destination when ranked by streams and total minutes spent viewing video. Myspace visitors spent 384 million minutes viewing video on the site, with an average of 38.8 minutes per viewer.  In comparison, Facebook visitors spent only 113.5 million minutes viewing video in April, with an average of 11.2 minutes per video viewer.</p>
<p>So maybe the better questions to ask are whom does each site reach &#8212; not who is &#8220;winning&#8221;  &#8212; and what audiences are they drawing and how are they building for the future to maintain the loyalty of their visitors who to this point have shown little long-term loyalty to any specific platform.</p>
<p>In April 2009, visitors aged 25 to 34 and 35 to 49 were the highest indexing age groups on Facebook, being 27 percent and 23 percent more likely to visit the site than the average user, respectively. In contrast, the highest indexing demographics on Myspace.com was people aged 18 to 24 and 12 to 17.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Unique Audience Composition Index by Age Group for Facebook and Myspace.com in April 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</h3>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Demographic Group</th>
<th> Facebook Composition Index</th>
<th> Myspace.com Composition Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2 – 11</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">12 – 17</td>
<td>95</td>
<td>134</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">18 – 24</td>
<td>106</td>
<td>143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">25 – 34</td>
<td>127</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">35 – 49</td>
<td>123</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">55 – 64</td>
<td>86</td>
<td>63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">65+</td>
<td>59</td>
<td>42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/time-spent-on-facebook-up-700-but-myspace-still-tops-for-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
