<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Broken Records: Music Sales for Albums and Digital Tracks up in First Half of 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/broken-records-music-sales-for-albums-and-digital-tracks-up-in-first-half-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/broken-records-music-sales-for-albums-and-digital-tracks-up-in-first-half-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen and Billboard's Mid-year Music Industry Report, overall album sales, digital album sales, catalog album sales and vinyl album sales all saw increases over the same six-month period in 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first half of 2011 saw a resurgence for the music industry, with album sales up for the first time since 2004.  According to Nielsen and Billboard&#8217;s Mid-year Music Industry Report, overall album sales, digital album sales, catalog album sales and vinyl album sales all saw increases over the same six-month period in 2010.  Digital sales, which accounted for one out of every three album purchases, are up 19% through the first six months over 2010 and are on pace to set a new sales record at the end of the year. This is just one of a number of records set to be broken—or already broken—in 2011.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/nielsen-billboard-H1-2011-sales.GIF"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28350" title="nielsen-billboard-H1-2011-sales" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/nielsen-billboard-H1-2011-sales.GIF" alt="nielsen-billboard-H1-2011-sales" width="575" height="612" /></a></p>
<p>“The consumption of music continues to be greater than ever,&#8221; says Eric Weinberg, President, Entertainment for Nielsen. &#8220;The sales figures for the first half of 2011 show the increased purchasing behavior is being driven by digital album sales, which are up nearly 20 percent over 2010, and the increased purchasing of catalog [older] titles.&#8221; Weinberg said, also noting that &#8220;While digital music sales continue to see strong growth, the CD still accounts for two out of every three album purchases.”</p>
<p><strong>Sales figures of note in 2011 include:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Black Eyed Peas’ &#8220;I Gotta Feeling&#8221; became the first digital song to sell more than 7 million tracks on March 20.</li>
<li>On July 3, Eminem’s <em>Recovery </em>became the first digital album to sell more than one million units; Adele’s <em>21 </em>is on track to surpass a million units next week. Through the first six months of the year, Adele has the biggest selling; album of the year, digital album of the year, physical album of the year and digital track of the year.</li>
<li>21 by Adele, has sold 2.5 million album sales, 1.5 million physical albums and 992,000 digital album sales while &#8220;Rolling in the Deep&#8221; has been downloaded more than four million times.</li>
<li>Adele’s <em>19 </em>is the biggest selling catalog album of the year through the first six months of 2011.</li>
<li>Lady Gaga’s <em>Born This Way</em> experienced the biggest 1st week album sales of 2011 with 1,108,000 units – the biggest 1st week album sales since 50 Cent’s <em>Massacre </em>in 2005. The album sold a record 662,000 digital albums in the first week of release.</li>
<li>&#8220;E.T.&#8221; by Katy Perry tops the chart for best selling digital song for the first six months of 2011 with 4.1 million downloads.</li>
</ul>
<p>More detail on the report is available at <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/record-labels/the-2011-pop-explosion-mid-year-numbers-1005267352.story" target="_blank">Billboard.biz</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/broken-records-music-sales-for-albums-and-digital-tracks-up-in-first-half-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music, Money &amp; Mobile: A Global Music Outlook</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/music-money-mobile-a-global-music-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/music-money-mobile-a-global-music-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Nielsen global survey of 26,644 online consumers across 53 countries explored the music industry's toughest questions: how to optimize marketing and how maximize revenue in a digital and increasingly mobile world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital redefined, and now dominates, the music business landscape. Whether downloaded, streamed or watched on a computer or mobile phone, the hyper-fragmented world of music offers unprecedented opportunities and challenges where both the consumer and the industry need to find their way. A recent Nielsen global survey of 26,644 online consumers across 53 countries explored the music industry&#8217;s toughest questions: how to optimize marketing and how maximize revenue in a digital and increasingly mobile world.</p>
<blockquote><p>You can download all of the reports at <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/hyper-fragmented-world-of-music.html">Nielsen.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Putting a price on music&#8217;s value</strong><br />
With more music available than ever from an unprecedented number of sources, we have seen that customers do use (and therefore value) music and the different channels. For content providers, understanding consumers&#8217; willingness to pay for content and via what channel(s) will be essential to the industry&#8217;s future.</p>
<p>The most popular form of digital music consumption was the “watch” habit with 57 percent of respondents having watched music videos on computers in the last three months. Other popular forms of consumption were streaming music on a computer (26%), streaming music on a mobile phone (21%), watching music video on mobile phones (23%) and downloading or using music apps (20%).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/global-music-consumption.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27057" title="global-music-consumption" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/global-music-consumption.png" alt="global-music-consumption" width="575" height="348" /></a></p>
<p>The sources for consuming music are as diverse as consumers&#8217; willingness to pay. The industry is continuing to investigate alternate revenue streams and the broad approach makes sense as consumers diversify their digital music sources.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/global-music-willingness-to-pay1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27067" title="global-music-willingness-to-pay" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/global-music-willingness-to-pay1.png" alt="global-music-willingness-to-pay" width="575" height="431" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Music goes mobile</strong><br />
Mobile phone technology and increasing popularity of smartphones are providing a new and  potentially lucrative revenue opportunity for the music industry.  Especially among digital music’s early adopter 20-24yr segment, the mobile phone is fast becoming the mainstay of how they stay connected to the world (via internet) and how they listen to and increasingly buy music. More promisingly, nearly one in four (24%)  of the 20-24yr old segment globally indicated they would be prepared to pay to download music videos on their mobile phone.  According to the Nielsen survey, males aged between 20-24yr are the global early adopters for digital music consumption and industry marketers need to understand and anticipate the changing habits of this segment to  develop viable revenue models. Generating the most interest to those looking for mobile music apps were music discovery tools and streaming apps.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/global-music-mobile-apps.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27060" title="global-music-mobile-apps" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/global-music-mobile-apps.png" alt="global-music-mobile-apps" width="575" height="370" /></a></p>
<p>On a regional level, consumers in Asia Pac by far showed the highest activity for music downloads on mobile devices.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/regional-paid-download.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27065" title="regional-paid-download" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/regional-paid-download.png" alt="regional-paid-download" width="575" height="369" /></a></p>
<p>For more regional and demographic insights on consumers&#8217; willingness to pay for music and more, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/hyper-fragmented-world-of-music.html">The Hyper-Fragmented World of Music</a>, a series of reports released in conjunction with MIDEM at Nielsen.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/music-money-mobile-a-global-music-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Average, Halftime Show Performers Score 555% Post Game Sales Bump</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/on-average-halftime-show-performers-score-500-post-game-sales-bump/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/on-average-halftime-show-performers-score-500-post-game-sales-bump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halftime show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soundscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Performers like Bruce Springsteen who performed at last year's Super Bowl see significant boosts to album, catalog, and digital sales.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Super Bowl offers tremendous exposure not just for the sport and its advertisers, but also for the A-list musicians who perform at halftime. A Nielsen SoundScan analysis shows that songs played during the last five Super Bowl halftime shows enjoyed an average 555% surge in sales the following week. Meanwhile, the performers’ top albums saw a 478% average spike in next-week sales.</p>
<p>Bruce Springsteen’s 2009 halftime performance coincided with the release of his newest album “Working on a Dream.” The show helped the album debut with 224,000 copies sold in its first week. The performance also boosted The Boss’s overall catalog, with all other album sales soaring 218% in the following week.</p>
<p>If digital downloads were any indication, Springsteen’s halftime set list was also a hit. In the week after the Super Bowl, digital sales surged for each of his four performed songs: &#8220;Tenth Avenue Freeze-Out&#8221; (+1320%), &#8220;Glory Days&#8221; (+602), &#8220;Born To Run&#8221; (+360) and &#8220;Working on a Dream&#8221; (+221%).</p>
<p>“The Super Bowl halftime show is an incredible driver of music sales time and time again,” says Dave Bakula, SVP of Analytics for Nielsen Entertainment.  “Big televised events like the SuperBowl and the Grammy Awards help expose artists to millions of Americans of different ages that they may not normally be exposed to.  When a classic rock artist, like Springsteen or Tom Petty, performs in the SuperBowl, it also reminds fans why they fell in love with the artist in the first place and drives those people to purchase.” </p>
<p><strong>Post Game TV Bump</strong><br />
Only a handful of TV shows have ever had the benefit of a Super Bowl lead-in. For network programmers, the post-game timeslot offers a rare opportunity to introduce a program to a wide range of viewers that they may not otherwise reach. Since 1990, the most watched post game broadcast was a special episode of Friends that aired after Dallas beat Pittsburgh in Super Bowl XXX on NBC.<br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> MOST WATCHED POST SUPER BOWL GAMES<br />
(since 1990)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Super Bowl</th>
<th> Year</th>
<th> Network</th>
<th> Program After the Game</th>
<th> Avg # of Viewers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">XXX</td>
<td>1996</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>Friends</td>
<td>52,925,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">XXXV</td>
<td>2001</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>Survivor II</td>
<td>45,369,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">XL</td>
<td>2006</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Grey’s Anatomy</td>
<td>37,881,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">XXXII</td>
<td>1998</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>Third Rock from the Sun</td>
<td>33,662,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">XXXVIII</td>
<td>2004</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>Survivor All-Star</td>
<td>33,535,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Another measure of success for these shows is the percent of viewers retained from the game. Friends, for example, held 56% of the 94 million Super Bowl XXX viewers. More recently, post-Super Bowl programming has seen mixed results:<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/audience-retention.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19943" title="audience-retention" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/audience-retention.png" alt="audience-retention" width="575" height="233" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/on-average-halftime-show-performers-score-500-post-game-sales-bump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Buzz to Sales: The Impact of the UK&#8217;s &#8220;X-Factor&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/from-buzz-to-sales-the-impact-of-the-uks-x-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/from-buzz-to-sales-the-impact-of-the-uks-x-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Factor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company revealed the impact that a performance on the Sunday Results programme of the UK series  X Factor had on digital download sales (online and mobile), online buzz and radio airplay for the special guest stars promoting a track.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>A Nielsen Company analysis of the UK&#8217;s X Factor, reveals that guest stars originally discovered by talent shows saw the largest levels of sales, buzz and radio airplay.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>UK Digital Download Sales</strong><br />
According to the recorded music industry trade body, the BPI, digital downloads account for 98 percent of UK single sales. Unsurprisingly, download sales for the song each guest star performed on the <em>X Factor</em> results show increased as, mostly, it coincided with the digital release of that single or album. However, tracks already available before to buy before the show also had large hikes in sales.</p>
<p>Four of the five guest stars who sold the most UK downloads of their song during the week following their appearance are TV talent show discoveries. Leading the way was Cheryl Cole, from <em>Popstars: The Rivals</em> winners Girls Aloud, who sold over 221,000 copies of her single “Fight For This Love” in the week after her performance. Cole was followed by 2008 <em>X Factor</em> finalists, Alexandra Burke (145,320) and JLS (86,725). After the Black Eyed Peas (79,706), 2006 <em>X Factor</em> winner Leona Lewis was fifth with 67,404 sales of “Happy” &#8211; her first of two 2009 finals performances.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/x-factor3.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19422" title="x-factor3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/x-factor3.jpg" alt="x-factor3" width="575" height="265" /></a></p>
<p>An <em>X Factor</em> performance had a huge effect on tracks already available to buy. Shakira benefited most from appearing on the show, selling 358% more copies of “Did It Again” the week after the show compared to the week before &#8211; even though the track was available for purchase 5 weeks earlier. Michael Bublé&#8217;s “Cry Me a River” had already been available for a week before his appearance, via the album, but he benefited from a 323% increase in sales the week after the show. Leona Lewis&#8217; performance of &#8220;Stop Crying Your Heart Out&#8221; &#8211; her second performance during the 2009 finals &#8211; contributed to a 215% increase in sales even though the track had already been available, via the album, for a month.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/x-factor1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19415" title="x-factor1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/x-factor1.jpg" alt="x-factor1" width="575" height="213" /></a></p>
<p><strong> Online Buzz</strong><br />
For almost all the 18 guest stars promoting a track on the X Factor, online buzz in the UK increased after their performance. Only George Michael, Rihanna and Bon Jovi saw a decrease in online mentions or &#8220;talkability.&#8221; The eight most buzzed about stars during the fortnight around their appearance were all female, lead by previous X Factor winners Leona Lewis, around her “Happy” performance, and Alexandra Burke.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/x-factor2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19418" title="x-factor2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/x-factor2.jpg" alt="x-factor2" width="402" height="199" /></a><br />
Just as the stars discovered by TV talent shows sold most digital download sales, they tended to benefit most in terms of increases in online buzz levels (87 percent average increase) around their X Factor performance than their counterparts who rose to fame through traditional avenues (45 percent). Susan Boyle (139 percent) and JLS (138 percent) benefited most in terms of increased buzz levels during the week commencing the Sunday of their performance, compared to the week before. Alicia Keys (130 percent) and Whitney Houston (114 percent) were the &#8220;traditional&#8221; artists with the greatest increase in levels of online buzz.<br />
<strong> Radio Airplay</strong><br />
Westlife were the only guests for which the show was the debut airing of the song – all the others had their song broadcast on the radio for varying periods of time before their X Factor performance.</p>
<p>The most radio plays the week of a performance correlated almost identically with the most download sales – being dominated by the &#8220;TV talent show&#8221; guest stars. Cheryl Cole led the way (3,082 plays) followed by Alexandra Burke (2,748) and JLS (2,554). Leona Lewis&#8217; “Happy” was fifth (2,069) but behind Whitney Houston (2,284) not the Black Eyed Peas.</p>
<p>In terms of increased radio airplay, Mariah Carey was, by far, the biggest beneficiary of an X Factor performance with a 297 percent increase in plays of “I Want To Know What Love Is” &#8211; despite the song having its first UK radio play 12 weeks earlier. Alicia Keys followed, with a 72 percent increase in plays of “Doesn’t Mean Anything,” its debut airing being seven weeks earlier. Third was Susan Boyle, with “Wild Horses” benefitting from a 71 percent airplay increase, six weeks after debut.</p>
<p>Jean Littolff, Managing Director, Nielsen Music Control, says: “The X Factor results program is a major marketing vehicle for established stars – particularly for those discovered through the TV talent show medium itself. This type tends to have most activity in terms of download sales, online buzz and radio airplays post performance. However, the greatest impact in terms of changing levels of activity pre vs. post performance is for artists who have travelled a more traditional route to fame.”</p>
<ul>
<li>For more information, download the full UK press release on the <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/pr/pr_100114_uk.pdf">X-Factor</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/from-buzz-to-sales-the-impact-of-the-uks-x-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking the Hits Along the Musical The Long Tail</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tracking-the-hits-along-the-musical-the-long-tail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tracking-the-hits-along-the-musical-the-long-tail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hit songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=18071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hit digital albums have lost market share to far less popular titles. But hit digital tracks have gained market share over the years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Glenn Peoples, Senior Editorial Analyst, Billboard</em></strong></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>For most people, Chris Anderson’s 2006 book <em>The Long Tail</em> marked a new way of thinking about selling goods on the Internet. Being free of the physical limits of shelf space, he predicted, would alter what people bought. For music, this would mean the most popular music titles would become less popular as consumers were able to tap into vast online catalogs. In most corners of the business world, and especially in the music industry, <em>The Long Tail</em> was controversial. Would consumers actually start to ignore the hits?</p>
<p>A <em>Billboard </em>analysis of Nielsen SoundScan data going back to 2004 shows Anderson wasn’t correct on all points. Hit digital albums have lost market share to far less popular titles. But hit digital tracks have <em>gained</em> market share over the years. The top 200 tracks accounted for 14.5% of sales in 2004 and rose to 15.8% in 2005, 17.1% in 2006 and 2007 and 17.2% in 2008. Through October 25, 2009, the top 200 tracks’ share stood at 18.7%.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/LongTail_Chart02.JPG"><img class="size-full wp-image-18077 aligncenter" title="LongTail_Chart02" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/LongTail_Chart02.JPG" alt="LongTail_Chart02" width="464" height="801" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The top 200 digital albums have shown an opposite trend in market share, steadily dropping to 21.9% in 2008 from 28.7% in 2004. At 22.1%, digital albums’ market share through October, 2009 is slightly better than 2008’s figure.</p>
<p>These two trends imply album and track purchase decisions may be driven by different factors. The most popular tracks may be benefitting from a herd effect due to the viral nature of the Internet. The awareness generated by that small number of songs could drown out less popular songs. Album buyers show they have more diverse tastes and take advantage of the vast catalogs at online retailers. So consumers may prefer to sample the depths of long tail through albums, not by individual songs.</p>
<p>Any discussion of Anderson’s book and theories should include how the record label’s role has changed. A popular sentiment of <em>The Long Tail</em> is that artists have all the tools they need to self-release digital music. That is true. Barriers to entry have been lowered to the point where the costs of recording and commercially releasing music are negligible. As Anderson explained in <em>The Long Tail<em>,</em></em> cheaper tools of production and distribution have greatly increased the supply of music found online.</p>
<p>But acquiring distribution and getting a sale are two different things. People tend to underestimate the amount of competition faced in digital music. Over 100,000 albums were released in 2008 alone – and about half of those were digital-only releases. Not only does a title have to compete against other new releases, it has to compete against the tens of thousands of well known catalog titles that are available online. It takes resources – both money and expertise – to rise above the competition and achieve sales commensurate to what career-oriented artists need. Such resources are the domain of record labels, who <em>can</em> still find success in the digital world.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">While <em>The Long Tail</em> was less explicit about record labels’ role in a changing digital marketplace, in July Anderson told The Times that record labels “are now the least important part” of the music industry. That is true for those with very low sales goals. These days a more established artist, or a mere hobbyist, can circumvent a contract with a record label by using inexpensive digital tools and outsourcing some record label functions. For the more ambitious and the less established, a record label is still by far the best way out of obscurity.</p>
<p><strong>Summary of <em>Billboard</em>’</strong><strong>s analysis:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>As more digital albums are released, the more popular titles lose market share  to the less popular titles. In other words, demand has shifted from the hits to  the niches. <span>The head (what Anderson would call the top 5,000  titles) has lost market share to the tail (all other albums). </span>The head accounted for 77% of  digital album sales in 2005. By 2008, the head’s market share had steadily  dropped to 65%.</li>
<li>Sales of digital albums have become less hit-oriented while digital tracks have become slightly more hit-oriented. The top 200 digital albums have accounted for a smaller share of total digital album sales since 2004. In contrast, the top 200 digital tracks’ share of total sales has nudged upward during that time period.</li>
<li>Sales of individual tracks (those purchased independently, not as part of an album) account for the majority of digital music purchased in the U.S. Individual tracks accounted for 57% of all digital music sold in 2008 (assuming 12 tracks per album).</li>
<li>In any given week, the top 200 digital tracks account for nearly one in four track purchases. To put that in context, Amazon.com’s MP3 store currently lists 9.99 million tracks. So, the top 200 tracks represent only 0.002% of what a large download store stocks.</li>
<li>Even titles in the tail (below #5,000) have lost some market share recently. In  2008, the top 8,000 digital albums lost market share to lower-ranked albums. But  it wasn’t the best-selling albums that suffered the most. Albums ranked from  #200 to #800 suffered the biggest drop in digital album market share from 2004  to 2008 – between 25% and 34%</li>
<li>While lower ranks have gained market share over the years, any one title has not gained much. For example, an album ranked at #9,000 in 2008 sold about 1,050 digital albums. Less than 100 of those units can be attributed to gains in market share over the previous four years.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>An expanded version of this story first appeared at <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/magazine/features/e3i35ed869fbd929ccdcca52ed7fd9262d3?imw=Y">billboard.biz</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tracking-the-hits-along-the-musical-the-long-tail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women More Ravenous for Music Sites</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/women-more-ravenous-for-music-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/women-more-ravenous-for-music-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In August, women made up 56.1 percent of the Web traffic to music sites. Overall, music sites pulled in 42.5 million unique female visitors in August.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether checking on rapper Fabolous&#8217; health scare or Alicia Keys love life, women are far more likely to be heading to music news or music listening sites than men, according to Nielsen data.</p>
<p>In August, women made up 56.1 percent of the Web traffic to music sites. Overall, music sites pulled in 42.5 million unique female visitors in August.</p>
<p>While it might seem like young girls would be scouring sites for the latest news on the Jonas Brothers, it is actually women 35-60 who make up about a third of visitors to music sites.</p>
<p>Females age 35-49 make up the largest group. More than 14.5 million women within that demographic visited online music sites in August. This made up 19.2 percent of all visitors to music sites during the month.</p>
<p>Less than a fifth (15.6 percent) of U.S. females 18 or older said they purchased music online within the past six months. Sixteen percent said they bought a music offline during the same span, per Nielsen@Plan Fall 2009 Survey. Slightly more than 8 percent of women watched or listened to music online.</p>
<p>The top two sites visited by women for the month of August were: AOL Music (11.8 million unique visitors) and Yahoo Music (9.9 million). MSN Music was a distant third with a unique audience of 3.9 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/women-more-ravenous-for-music-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music To My Ears &#8211; Advertising Amplifies Sales</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/music-to-my-ears-advertising-amplifies-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/music-to-my-ears-advertising-amplifies-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=15127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sold out show or an album going gold, platinum or diamond is music to the ears of emerging artists and veteran musicians alike. But achieving that goal typically takes more than just great songs—exposure is a key contributor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/content/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/home/insights/consumer_insight/september_2009/music_to_my_ears.mbc.70468.ImageSrc.jpg" alt="" width="542" height="151" /></p>
<h3><em>Virginia Harvey, Client Service, Nielsen Monitor-Plus</em></h3>
<blockquote><p><strong>SUMMARY: </strong>The rise to stardom does not come arbitrarily, but rather is often the by-product of a carefully constructed plan that brings together a perfect blend of talent, timing and a great advertising promotion plan. Nielsen investigates how some of the more recent campaigns in the music world achieved success.</p></blockquote>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>More than just great songs—exposure is a key contributor&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>A sold out show or an album going gold, platinum or diamond is music to the ears of emerging artists and veteran musicians alike. But achieving that goal typically takes more than just great songs—exposure is a key contributor. In the February issue of <em>Consumer Insight</em>, Nielsen reported that music artists saw album sales climb as much as 700% one week after the Grammy’s aired on broadcast television. Now, Nielsen takes a closer look at the backstage-pass advertising that amplifies album sales, digital downloads, and concert sales.</p>
<p><strong>Total concert advertising spend</strong><br />
In 2008, total advertising spend for concerts in combined print, TV, Internet, and outdoor tallied just over $207 million. April dominated sales with $23.2 million, which surpassed May—a close second—by 10%. Contributing $2.3 million to April’s total was spending for Neil Diamond’s <em>Home Before Dark</em> tour.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>Ticket sales grossed a 28% increase&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>A review of the top three artists’ spending for 2008 reveals that Neil Diamond once again led total spending at $6.2 million, followed by Tina Tuner with $4.3 million and Trans-Siberian Orchestra (TSO) $3.6 million. TSO, which tours on a yearly basis during the holiday season, increased advertising spend in 2008 by 37%. The increase paid off, as 2008 ticket sales grossed $47.3 million—a 28% increase over 2007 results of $36.9 million.</p>
<p>Overall, monthly spending was fairly consistent, with one exception—January started the year slow with a $9.4 million outlay.</p>
<p><img id="/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009#Par.1477.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009.Par.1477.Image.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Veteran acts re-emerge</strong><br />
Tom Petty &amp; The Heartbreakers’ 2008 tour proved to be one of the biggest of the year. With an estimated 32 U.S. shows and 25 sell outs, total ticket sales grossed $34.8 million. Helping to re-ignite the name—to about 97 million viewers—was a calculated move to play at the <em>Super Bowl XLII</em> half-time show.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>The pay-off in publicizing is revealed&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Additional media vehicles that contributed to a successful tour included countless articles in magazines and online blogs about Petty’s recent greatest hits album and tour. From <em>SPIN</em> to <em>Variety</em>, Tom Petty &amp; The Heartbreakers’ had a wealth of media exposure. Roughly two-thirds (64%) of their promotional spending was placed in newspapers and one-third was split between local radio ($223,000) and television ($141,000) ads.</p>
<p>The pay-off in publicizing is further revealed by a review of Tom Petty’s tour promotion ad spending in 2005 and 2006. In 2006, ad spending increased 61%, from $430,000 to $694,000, grossing $25.2 million in ticket sales—$3.2 million higher than 2005 sales.</p>
<p><img id="/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009#Par.7027.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009.Par.7027.Image.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Hot commodities</strong><br />
A new era of Tween fans have emerged with the introduction Hannah Montana and the Jonas Brothers. With the help of the Disney Channel, acts such as these have become a household name. The Hannah Montana show—with viewers that number upwards of an average 10.7 million over the past three years—has driven awareness levels so high that traditional advertising for the 2007/2008 tour totaled only $430,000. An additional $2.7 million was spent promoting various Hannah Montana paraphernalia, such as toy figures, playsets and perfume. Hannah Montana sold out all 70 shows from October 2007 through January 2008 and grossed $55.2 million in ticket sales.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>Solidifies the importance of exposure and familiarity&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>While the Jo Bro’s have been associated with Disney (collaborating to create a Disney Channel original movie), the bands’ main source of promotion was TV, magazine, newspaper, and radio ($1.3 million). As impressive as their third album was—selling 525,000 copies in just the first week of its release alone—they sold out only 54 U.S. shows out of 82 and total ticket sales grossed $41.9 million. While both acts are hot commodities, girl power triumphs and solidifies the importance of exposure and familiarity.</p>
<p><strong>Rise from obscurity</strong><br />
When Apple introduced the iPod in 2001, their eye-catching roller-skating, freestyle silhouette advertisements paired with memorable songs transformed the digital download world—and brought success to many little-known artists. Most notable was the release of the third-generation iPod Nano, when Apple featured the single <em><a class="OrangeSubhead" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkpdJ_0ubXI" target="_blank">1234</a> </em>from Feist. Prior to the commercial airing in September 2007, the single generated 60,000 digital downloads. After the commercial hit the airwaves, downloads increased ten-fold—rising to 638,000 from September to December 2007, according to Nielsen.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>Downloads increased ten-fold&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>With the success of that campaign, Apple continued to spotlight up-and-coming bands. When The Ting Ting’s hit single, <em><a class="OrangeSubhead" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3FzS6lm7nk&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=6BC4C303E4038459&amp;playnext=1&amp;playnext_from=PL&amp;index=7" target="_blank">Shut Up and Let Me Go</a></em>, appeared in an iPod commercial in April 2008, it peaked at number 55 on the Billboard Hot 100 list. And in September 2008, the newest fourth-generation iPod Nano (Chromatic) line introduced the band Chairlift with a 30-second commercial that featured the song <em><a class="OrangeSubhead" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftTaWwtbvgM&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=B47D6C248DE55191&amp;playnext=1&amp;playnext_from=PL&amp;index=2" target="_blank">Bruises</a></em>, which was just enough to send the song to the top of the <em>Billboard Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles</em> chart.</p>
<p><img id="/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009#Par.74774.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009.Par.74774.Image.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Movie soundtracks can also have a profound affect on the popularity of a song. In February 2008, M.I.A released the single <em>Paper Planes</em>, which gained commercial attention when it was featured in the film and trailer for <em>Pineapple Express</em>. Digital copies soared from one week to the next selling 58,800 the week prior to the opening of the movie to 102,000 copies during the week of opening day—a 74% increase. From the time of the film’s opening week in early August, which included $6 million in TV ad spending to the end of September, digital copies spilled over to one million. Several months later, the song appeared in the film and soundtrack <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em> gaining awareness once again. The song eventually peaked at number four on <em>Billboard Hot 100</em> and was nominated for the Record of the Year during the 51st Grammy Awards.</p>
<p><img id="/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009#Par.49239.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/september_2009.Par.49239.Image.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Chart toppers</strong><br />
The right exposure has the power to elevate a band to a level of success not possible otherwise. Finding the best promotion mix is vital. From targeting the right audience and selecting impactful platforms to delivering creative messages that resonate—understanding the consumer is the fundamental building block from which all successful programs begin. Whether the goal is instant stardom, re-introduction or business-as-usual, the ability to top the charts is all about creating awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/music-to-my-ears-advertising-amplifies-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Stats: Myspace Music Growing, Twitter&#8217;s Big Move</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Myspace.com continues its strategic move toward becoming an &#8220;entertainment portal,&#8221; the growth to Myspace Music should help cement their presence in this space. Since the site&#8217;s launch in September 2008, unique visitors to the music.myspace.com subdomain have increased 190 percent &#8212; growing from 4.2 million unique visitors to 12.1 million in June 2009. Year-over-year  traffic to the URL has increased 1,017 percent.
When comparing unique visitors of the music.myspace.com subdomain to other sites within the music category in June, it ranked third behind AOL Music and Yahoo! Music and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Myspace.com continues its strategic move toward becoming an &#8220;entertainment portal,&#8221; the growth to Myspace Music should help cement their presence in this space. Since the site&#8217;s launch in September 2008, unique visitors to the music.myspace.com subdomain have increased 190 percent &#8212; growing from 4.2 million unique visitors to 12.1 million in June 2009. Year-over-year  traffic to the URL has increased 1,017 percent.</p>
<p>When comparing unique visitors of the music.myspace.com subdomain to other sites within the music category in June, it ranked third behind AOL Music and Yahoo! Music and ahead of  popular music sites like MTV Networks Music and Pandora.com.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/musicportals.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13679" title="musicportals" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/musicportals.png" alt="" width="500" height="276" /></a></p>
<p>People between the ages of 12 and 17 were 2.4 time more likely than the average active Internet user to visit music.myspace.com. Visitors between 18 and 24 were 2.2 more likely than the average Internet user to visit the site in June.</p>
<p><span id="more-13678"></span></p>
<p>On the video streaming front, with 120.1 million total streams, Myspace.com was the No. 1 social media site when ranked by streams for June 2009. It was also the No. 1 social networking site when ranked by unique viewers of video content, with 12.9 million viewers for the month. Facebook was the fastest growing social media site by both total video streams and unique viewers of video. Total streams increased 434 percent year-over-year, from 10.1 million streams to 54 million streams. Unique viewers of video increased 397 percent, from 2.4 million in June 2008 to 12 million in June 2009.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/video_streams.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13689" title="video_streams" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/video_streams.png" alt="" width="500" height="166" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/myspace_demo.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13681" title="myspace_demo" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/myspace_demo.png" alt="" width="500" height="246" /></a></p>
<h3>Twitter&#8217;s Big Move</h3>
<p>Among the top 10 social media sites, Twitter.com was again the fastest growing, increasing 1,928 percent year-over-year, from 1 million unique visitors in June 2008 to 21 million unique visitors in June 2009&#8211;making Twitter the fourth most visited member communities site in June. Facebook continued to lead as the No. 1 U.S. social networking site for the sixth month in a row, with 87.3 million unique visitors in June 2009.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/topsites_june09.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13682" title="topsites_june09" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/topsites_june09.png" alt="" width="500" height="343" /></a></p>
<h3>Facebook No. 1 For Time Spent</h3>
<p>Facebook was also the No. 1 social networking site among the top 10 when ranked by average time per person, with visitors spending an average of 4 hours and 33 minutes on the site in June. This is a 240 percent year-over-year increase. The average time per person on Twitter increased 522 percent year-over-year, from 5 minutes and 2 seconds in June 2008 to 31 minutes and 17 seconds in June 2009, making it the fastest growing by time per person among the top 10.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timespent_june091.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13688" title="timespent_june091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timespent_june091.png" alt="" width="500" height="355" /></a></p>
<p><strong>*Note:</strong> <em>Effective with June 2009 data reporting, Nielsen has made several <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-launches-expanded-web-measurement-panel/">enhancements</a> to the NetView and VideoCensus services, including a panel that is 8 times larger, more granular reporting and improved accuracy and representativeness. These enhancements provide the highest quality data to our clients and the marketplace. For some sites, trending of previously-reported data with current results may show percentage differences attributable to these product enhancements and should only be compared directionally.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-stats-myspace-music-growing-twitters-big-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson News Dominates Web Buzz</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/michael-jackson-news-dominates-web-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/michael-jackson-news-dominates-web-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billboard album sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl halftime show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The breaking news of Michael Jackson&#8217;s sudden death dominated the web yesterday (and today), causing spikes in traffic and overwhelming social networks such as Twitter and Facebook with bursts of information and updates from millions of users. In comparison, discussions of Jackson far exceeded those of the swine flu scare as well as the inauguration of President Obama.

Nielsen Buzzmetrics analysis shows that more than 16% of tweets over the past 24 hours reference Michael Jackson, and less than 2 percent of Tweets mention Farrah Fawcett and Iran.

A Topper of Charts ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The breaking news of Michael Jackson&#8217;s sudden death dominated the web yesterday (and today), causing spikes in traffic and overwhelming social networks such as Twitter and Facebook with bursts of information and updates from millions of users. In comparison, discussions of Jackson far exceeded those of the swine flu scare as well as the inauguration of President Obama.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13127" title="Michael Jackson buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/mj_buzz.png" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></p>
<p>Nielsen Buzzmetrics analysis shows that more than 16% of tweets over the past 24 hours reference Michael Jackson, and less than 2 percent of Tweets mention Farrah Fawcett and Iran.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/mj_twitter.png"><img src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/mj_twitter.png" alt="" title="mj_twitter" width="500" height="400" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13145" /></a></p>
<h3>A Topper of Charts and a Major TV Draw</h3>
<p>That Jackson&#8217;s passing dominated the web is no surprise, as he has been a major media draw for decades. According to <a href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/michael-jackson-king-of-billboard-s-pop-1003988140.story">Billboard</a>, over the course of his solo career, Jackson charted 47 singles on the Billboard Hot 100, 13 of which went to No. 1. As part of the Jackson 5, he earned an additional four No. 1 Hot 100 hits.In addition to his unparalleled dominance on the <a href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/michael-jackson-king-of-billboard-s-pop-1003988140.story" target="_blank">Billboard music charts</a> with albums like <em>Thriller</em>, his past television appearances have attracted millions of curious viewers eager to see more of the reclusive, yet ubiquitous, star.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Notable Michael Jackson TV Apperances</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> NETWORK</th>
<th> DATE</th>
<th> SHOW</th>
<th> DETAILS</th>
<th> VIEWERS</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ABC</td>
<td>2/6/2003</td>
<td>20/20 Special</td>
<td>Controversial documentary on Jackson by Martin Bashir</td>
<td>27,111,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">CBS</td>
<td>12/28/2003</td>
<td>60 Minutes</td>
<td>Ed Bradley interviews Michael Jackson</td>
<td>18,784,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">CBS</td>
<td>11/13/2001</td>
<td>30th Anniv Special</td>
<td>Michael Jackson 30th Anniversary Special</td>
<td>25,731,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ABC</td>
<td>6/14/1995</td>
<td>Primetime Live</td>
<td>Diane Sawyer interviews Jackson &amp; Lisa Marie Presley</td>
<td>37,532,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MTV</td>
<td>9/8/1994</td>
<td>MTV Video Music Awards</td>
<td>Michael Jackson &amp; Lisa Marie Presley debut as husband/wife</td>
<td>5,359,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ABC</td>
<td>2/10/1993</td>
<td>Oprah Winfrey Special</td>
<td>Oprah and Jackson Interview</td>
<td>62,289,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NBC</td>
<td>1/31/1993</td>
<td>Super Bowl XXVII</td>
<td>Michael Jackson Super Bowl halftime show</td>
<td>90,990,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/michael-jackson-news-dominates-web-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tops In 2008: Best Selling Books, Audio Books</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-best-selling-books-audio-books/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-best-selling-books-audio-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A New Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloaded songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eckhart Tolle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3 markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products placements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Shack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tops In 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William P. Young]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen has issued a year-end look at the most popular trends among Americans during 2008, covering everything from the top TV programs to the most popular consumer packaged goods.
William P. Young&#8217;s &#8221;The Shack&#8221; was the top-selling fiction book through November 30.
Among non-fiction books, &#8220;A New Earth,&#8221; by Eckhart Tolle was the top-seller.
The audio version of Tolle&#8217;s &#8220;A New Earth&#8221; was the top-selling audio book of the year.

Top 10 Book Sales: Adult Fiction



Rank
Book Title
Author
Format
Publisher
Publication
Date


1
The Shack
William P. Young
Trade Paperback
Hachette Book Group
7/1/08


2
The Appeal
John Grisham
Hardcover
Random House
1/1/08


3
The Host
Stephenie Meyer
Hardcover
Hachette Book Group
5/1/08


4
The Friday Night Knitting Club
Kate Jacobs
Trade Paperback
Penguin Books
1/1/08


5
Water For ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/books1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5914" title="books1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/books1-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>Nielsen has issued a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nielsen-top-tens-2008-final16.pdf">year-end look</a> at the most popular trends among Americans during 2008, covering everything from the top TV programs to the most popular consumer packaged goods.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/books.jpg"></a>William P. Young&#8217;s &#8221;The Shack&#8221; was the top-selling fiction book through November 30.</p>
<p>Among non-fiction books, &#8220;A New Earth,&#8221; by Eckhart Tolle was the top-seller.</p>
<p>The audio version of Tolle&#8217;s &#8220;A New Earth&#8221; was the top-selling audio book of the year.</p>
<p><span id="more-5898"></span></p>
<p><strong>Top 10 Book Sales: Adult Fiction</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Book Title</th>
<th>Author</th>
<th>Format</th>
<th>Publisher</th>
<th>Publication<br />
Date</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>The Shack</td>
<td>William P. Young</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Hachette Book Group</td>
<td>7/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>The Appeal</td>
<td>John Grisham</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>1/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>The Host</td>
<td>Stephenie Meyer</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Hachette Book Group</td>
<td>5/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>The Friday Night Knitting Club</td>
<td>Kate Jacobs</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Penguin Books</td>
<td>1/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Water For Elephants</td>
<td>Sara Gruen</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Workman Publishing</td>
<td>5/1/07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>The Kite Runner</td>
<td>Khaled Hosseini</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Penguin Books</td>
<td>1/1/03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>The Lucky One</td>
<td>Nicholas Sparks</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Hachette Book Group</td>
<td>9/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>The Story Of Edward Sawtelle</td>
<td>David Wroblewski</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Harper Collins</td>
<td>9/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Playing For Pizza</td>
<td>John Grisham</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>7/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Fearless Fourteen</td>
<td>Janet Evanovich</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>McMillan</td>
<td>6/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company (<strong><span class="style2">December 31, 2007 – December 28, 2008</span></strong>).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Note: Data does not include sales from Wal-Mart, Sam&#8217;s, BJ&#8217;s, airports, and libraries. Traditionally, book sales see increases during the holidays.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 Book Sales: Adult Non-Fiction</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Book Title</th>
<th>Author</th>
<th>Format</th>
<th>Publisher</th>
<th>Publication<br />
Date</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>A New Earth</td>
<td>Eckhart Tolle</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Penguin Books</td>
<td>2/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>The Last Lecture</td>
<td>Randy Pausch</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Hyperion</td>
<td>4/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Eat Pray Love</td>
<td>Elizabeth Gilbert</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Penguin Books</td>
<td>2/1/07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Three Cups of Tea</td>
<td>Greg Mortenson</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Penguin Books</td>
<td>2/1/07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>The Secret</td>
<td>Rhonda Byrne</td>
<td>Hardcover</td>
<td>Simon &amp; Schuster</td>
<td>11/1/06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Eat This Not That!</td>
<td>David Zinczenko</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>MacMillan</td>
<td>1/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>The Audacity of Hope</td>
<td>Barack Obama</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>11/1/07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Skinny Bitch</td>
<td>Kim Barnouin</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Pereus Books</td>
<td>1/1/06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Dreams from My Father</td>
<td>Barack Obama</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>8/1/04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>The Power of Now</td>
<td>Eckhart Tolle</td>
<td>Trade Paperback</td>
<td>PGW TR</td>
<td>8/1/04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company (December 31, 2007 &#8211; November 30, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="6">Note: Data does not include sales from Wal-Mart, Sam&#8217;s, BJ&#8217;s, airports, and libraries. Traditionally, book sales see increases during the holidays.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 Audio Book Sales: Adult and Juvenile</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Book Title</th>
<th>Author</th>
<th>Publisher</th>
<th>Publication<br />
Date</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>A New Earth</td>
<td>Eckhart Tolle</td>
<td>Penguin Books</td>
<td>2/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>The Secret</td>
<td>Rhonda Byrne</td>
<td>Simon &amp; Schuster</td>
<td>11/1/06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>The Last Lecture</td>
<td>Randy Pausch</td>
<td>Hyperion</td>
<td>4/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Become a Better You: 7 Keys to Improving …</td>
<td>Joel Osteen</td>
<td>Simon &amp; Schuster</td>
<td>10/1/07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>The Audacity of Hope</td>
<td>Barack Obama</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>11/1/07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>The Appeal (unabridged)</td>
<td>John Grisham</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>1/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>When You Are Engulfed in Flames</td>
<td>David Sedaris</td>
<td>Hachette Book Group</td>
<td>6/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Twilight</td>
<td>Stephenie Meyer</td>
<td>Random House</td>
<td>10/1/05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>The Power of Now</td>
<td>Eckhart Tolle</td>
<td>PGW TR</td>
<td>10/1/01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>The Shack</td>
<td>William P. Young</td>
<td>Oasis</td>
<td>6/1/08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (December 31, 2007 &#8211; November 30, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="5">Note: Data does not include sales from Wal-Mart, Sam&#8217;s, BJ&#8217;s, airports, and libraries. Traditionally, book sales see increases during the holidays.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nielsen-top-tens-2008-final17.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Relive the greatest hits of 2008 &#8212; stay tuned on Nielsen Wire for more </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/tops-in-2008/" target="_blank"><strong>Tops In 2008</strong></a><strong> coverage.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Look ahead to the new year with Nielsen Wire&#8217;s </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/2009-outlook/" target="_blank"><strong>2009 Industry Outlook</strong></a><strong> series.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/tops-in-2008-best-selling-books-audio-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

