<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8216;Deathly Hallows&#8217; film Breathes Life into Harry Potter Book Sales</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/deathly-hallows-film-breathes-life-into-harry-potter-book-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/deathly-hallows-film-breathes-life-into-harry-potter-book-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Potter films have worked magic on book sales in the past, though the jump in sales has decreased substantially with each subsequent movie release.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows, Part 1,</em> the seventh—and penultimate—movie in the Harry Potter series, opens November 19, nearly nine years after the first film debuted and more than a dozen years since the arrival of J.K. Rowling&#8217;s first Harry Potter book.  The release of each Potter film has coincided with a sales boost for the books series, although the jump in sales has decreased substantially with each subsequent movie release.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24965" title="harry-potter-3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-3.png" alt="harry-potter-3" width="536" height="456" /></a></p>
<p>Online buzz for Harry Potter in general has seen spikes around the movie trailer and impending opening of the movie.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24973" title="harry-potter-buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-buzz.png" alt="harry-potter-buzz" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><strong>First Film Drives Biggest Spike</strong><br />
During the four weeks following the November 2001 big screen debut of <em>Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone</em>, sales of the corresponding book more than tripled over the previous four weeks to 956,700 units. 223,200 <em>Sorcerer’s Stone</em> books were sold in the week of the movie’s debut alone. The excitement carried over to the entire series, with all four books then out seeing a sizeable increase in sales.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24962" title="harry-potter-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-1.png" alt="harry-potter-1" width="566" height="400" /></a></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong> The most recent Harry Hollywood incarnation, <em>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</em>, had a less dramatic effect on the book brand at its July 2009 box office debut. All Harry Potter books saw an uptick in sales but on a lower scale: <em>Half-Blood Prince </em>sold 50,400 units the four weeks following the movie’s debut, compared to the 33,800 books purchased the four weeks prior.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24963" title="harry-potter-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/harry-potter-2.png" alt="harry-potter-2" width="549" height="600" /></a></p>
<p><strong>2010 and Beyond?</strong></p>
<p>The Harry Potter films demonstrate the close relationship between book and movie sales. A hugely popular book creates a ready market for an adapted film.  At the same time, movies can have a dramatic effect on the sales of their book counterparts. However the scale of impact of film adaptations on book sales and their ability to introduce new readers to the book series can diminish over time as a film series draws to an end.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 1834px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';">However the scale of impact of film adaptations on book sales and their ability  to introduce new readers to the book series can diminish over time as a film  series draws to an end.</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/deathly-hallows-film-breathes-life-into-harry-potter-book-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book, Movie, Love: Best Sellers and the Hollywood Bounce</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/book-movie-love-best-sellers-and-the-hollywood-bounce/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/book-movie-love-best-sellers-and-the-hollywood-bounce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eat Pray Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie & Julia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August 13 release of the film version of Elizabeth Gilbert’s 2006 novel <em>Eat, Pray, Love</em> is the latest example of a popular book title moving to the big screen. While these books see success before their silver screen debuts, the buzz leading up to a film version can drive impressive sales.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The August 13 release of the film version of Elizabeth Gilbert’s 2006 memoir <em>Eat, Pray, Love</em> is the latest example of a popular book title moving to the big screen. These books achieve success long before their silver screen debuts, but the buzz immediately leading up to a film version can drive impressive sales.</p>
<p>&#8220;While the literary world is often the source of creative content for Hollywood, the relationship is reciprocal, as we often see Hollywood releases boosting book sales,” said Jonathan Nowell, President, Nielsen Book.</p>
<p><em>Eat, Pray, Love</em> has seen a rise in book sales, with 94,000 units sold in the week ending in August 1 alone, the same number of total units sold for the entire 2006 year, when the book was first published. So far, in 2010, the book has sold more than twice as many copies as all of 2009.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/EatPrayLove.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23475" title="EatPrayLove" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/EatPrayLove.png" alt="EatPrayLove" width="490" height="307" /></a></p>
<p>Last year, the book-to-movie bounce was seen most notably with &#8220;<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/mastering-the-art-of-mixing-bookshelf-with-silver-screen/">Julie &amp; Julia</a>,&#8221; which helped drives sales not only for Julie Powell’s <em>Julie &amp; Julia</em>, but also the Julia Child cookbooks that were Powell&#8217;s inspiration.</p>
<p>Other book-to-movie titles with a strong appeal to women have also seen a lift, despite a reduced media and box office profile. The February 2010 release of <em>Dear John</em> by Nicholas Sparks, author of other shelf-to-screen hits including <em>The Notebook</em>, sparked an uptick in book sales, contributing to over 1 million units sold during the 2010 year-to-date, nearly half of the book’s 2.4 million total sales. <em>My Sister’s Keeper</em> by Jodi Picoult made its silver screen debut in June 2009, five years after its original publication run. This novel also achieved its highest weekly sales number during the week of the film’s release with 81,000 units sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/book-movie-love-best-sellers-and-the-hollywood-bounce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Kiosks Signal Shift in Home Movie Viewing, Renting and Buying</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/dvd-kiosks-signal-shift-in-home-movie-viewing-renting-and-buying/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/dvd-kiosks-signal-shift-in-home-movie-viewing-renting-and-buying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie rentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While DVD sales declined for a third straight year in 2009, consumer appetite for viewing movies at home remains very healthy as new physical and digital services for buying and renting movies gain in popularity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Graham Gee, Vice President, Nielsen Home Entertainment</em></strong></p>
<p>While DVD sales declined for a third straight year in 2009, consumer appetite for viewing movies at home remains very healthy as new physical and digital services for buying and renting movies gain in popularity. The proliferation of movie rental kiosk machines over the last year was probably the most visible sign of consumer interest in viewing movies at home.</p>
<p>To understand the impact of rental kiosks and other movie services on household disc purchasing (DVD and Blu-ray), Nielsen fielded a survey to our panelists who were identified as disc buyers and asked them to report their movie transactions from channels not tracked by scanning. This included rental transactions (both physical and digital rentals) and downloads.</p>
<p>One finding from the study was that average disc purchasing (buy rate) among households who also rented movies on physical DVD or Blu-ray declined in 2009 at a steeper rate compared to the average for all disc buying households. The buy rate among households renting a movie on DVD or Blu-ray declined by -11% in 2009 vs. -7% among all disc buying households.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/dvd-sales.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21912" title="dvd-sales" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/dvd-sales.png" alt="dvd-sales" width="430" height="282" /></a></p>
<p>Survey results indicated that 34% of these renting households had rented a movie from a kiosk.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/kiosk-rentals.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21914" title="kiosk-rentals" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/kiosk-rentals.png" alt="kiosk-rentals" width="430" height="250" /></a></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>In addition, households renting from a kiosk are increasingly turning to kiosks to rent movies with 63% reporting that they had rented more movies from a kiosk in the past 12 months compared to the prior 12 months.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/buying-intent.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21915" title="buying-intent" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/buying-intent.png" alt="buying-intent" width="379" height="292" /></a></p>
<p>Demographically, disc buying households who also rented from a kiosk were more likely to have children under the age of 18 and skewed towards a suburban lifestyle when compared to the average disc buying household. Despite the value proposition of renting a movie from a kiosk for a dollar a day, these households are more likely to be on the upper end of household incomes.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Kiosk Rental Index by Demographics</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Profile</th>
<th> Kiosk Rental (index)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income &lt;$30K</td>
<td>72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income $30-50K</td>
<td>94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income $50-100K</td>
<td>117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH Income $100K+</td>
<td>108</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH w/ Kids &lt; 18</td>
<td><strong>134</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">HH w/ no Kids &lt; 18</td>
<td>74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cosompolitan Centers</td>
<td>92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Affluent Suburban Spreads</td>
<td><strong>127</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Comfortably Country</td>
<td>103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Struggling Urban Cores</td>
<td>70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Modest Working Towns</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Plain Rural Living</td>
<td>83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company &#8211; Indices based on total DVD buying households</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/dvd-kiosks-signal-shift-in-home-movie-viewing-renting-and-buying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heading into the Oscars, Award Show Viewing is Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/heading-into-the-oscars-award-show-viewing-is-up/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/heading-into-the-oscars-award-show-viewing-is-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Award shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic viewership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peoples Choice Award]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heading into the Academy Awards telecast on Sunday March 7, viewership is rising for several notable award shows. If this trend continues, this could mean good news for the Academy Awards, especially given overall movie ticket sales in 2009 and the Academy’s expansion of the best movie category from five to 10 films.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heading into the Academy Awards telecast on Sunday March 7, viewership is rising for several notable award shows. If this trend continues, this could mean good news for the Academy Awards, especially given overall movie ticket sales in 2009 and the Academy’s expansion of the best movie category from five to 10 films.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/awards-show-trend.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20575" title="awards-show-trend" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/awards-show-trend.png" alt="awards-show-trend" width="537" height="295" /></a></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Historical Ratings for the Academy Awards</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> YEAR</th>
<th> Best Picture Winner</th>
<th> Viewers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2009</td>
<td>Slumdog Millionaire</td>
<td>36,310,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2008</td>
<td>No Country For Old men</td>
<td>32,006,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2007</td>
<td>The Departed</td>
<td>40,172,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2006</td>
<td>Crash</td>
<td>38,939,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2005</td>
<td>Million Dollar Baby</td>
<td>42,139,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2004</td>
<td>Lord Of The Rings: Return Of The King</td>
<td>43,531,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2003</td>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td>33,043,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2002</td>
<td>A Beautiful Mind</td>
<td>41,782,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2001</td>
<td>Gladiator</td>
<td>42,944,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2000</td>
<td>American Beauty</td>
<td>46,333,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The films and the nominees certainly play a role in the size and demographic makeup of the Oscar viewer. In years where a minority was nominated in a major category, viewership among that ethnic group grew, most notably with African American viewership. <em>Precious</em>, which is nominated for best film also boasts nominees for best actress in a leading (Gabourey Sidibe) and supporting (Mo&#8217;Nique) role as well as director Lee Daniels. Past winner Morgan Freeman (<em>Invictus</em>) is also nominated this year.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Recent African American Viewership of Academy Awards</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Year</th>
<th> Nominees</th>
<th> Film</th>
<th> African American Viewers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2009</td>
<td>Viola Davis<br />
Taraji P. Henson</td>
<td>Doubt<br />
The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button</td>
<td>3,009,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2008</td>
<td>Ruby Dee</td>
<td>American Gangster</td>
<td>2,151,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2007</td>
<td>Forest Whitaker^<br />
Will Smith<br />
Eddie Murphy<br />
Djimon Hounsou<br />
Jennifer Hudson^</td>
<td>The Last King Of Scotland<br />
The Pursuit Of Happyness<br />
Dreamgirls<br />
Blood Diamond<br />
Dreamgirls</td>
<td>4,882,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2006</td>
<td>Terrence Howard</td>
<td>Hustle &amp; Flow</td>
<td>3,369,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2005</td>
<td>Jamie Foxx^<br />
Don Cheadle<br />
Morgan Freeman^<br />
Jamie Foxx<br />
Sophie Okenedo</td>
<td>Ray<br />
Hotel Rwanda<br />
Million Dollar Baby<br />
Collateral<br />
Hotel Rwanda</td>
<td>5,270,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
^ = award winner</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/heading-into-the-oscars-award-show-viewing-is-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar-Nominated Actors and Films Compete in Online Buzz Battle</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/oscar-nominated-actors-and-films-compete-in-online-buzz-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/oscar-nominated-actors-and-films-compete-in-online-buzz-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Academy Awards on March 7, fans online are increasingly discussing the nominees for best picture (a category that has expanded to include 10 films this year) and the best actor/actress awards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>UPDATED 03/04 to reflect additional misspellings of film titles.</em></p>
<p>With the Academy Awards on March 7, fans online are increasingly discussing the nominees for best picture (a category that has expanded to include 10 films this year) along with the actors and actresses nominated in a lead role.</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s an honor just to be nominated&#8230; <em>Avatar</em> dominates (much like it did at the global box office) the conversations in the movie category, grabbing nearly a quarter of all buzz surrounding the Oscar-nominated films.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/film-buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20476" title="film-buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/film-buzz.png" alt="film-buzz" width="489" height="285" /></a></p>
<p>In the main acting categories, Golden Globe winners Jeff Bridges (for <em>Crazy Heart</em>) and Sandra Bullock (for <em>The Blind Side</em>)  take the buzz lead with more than a quarter of the buzz against their competition.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/lead-actor-actress-buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20480" title="lead-actor-actress-buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/lead-actor-actress-buzz.png" alt="lead-actor-actress-buzz" width="481" height="616" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/oscar-nominated-actors-and-films-compete-in-online-buzz-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaching The Hispanic Moviegoer</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/reaching-the-hispanic-moviegoer/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/reaching-the-hispanic-moviegoer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moviegoer demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the early days of the Silver Screen, immigrant characters were not necessarily embraced.  Indeed, it wasn&#8217;t until Margarita Cansino changed her name to Rita Hayworth did she hit the big time.  Today, such a move would not be necessary, as attracting Hispanics is one path for a movie to become a blockbuster.  While Latinos make up about 15 percent of the U.S. population, they represent 28 percent of today&#8217;s heavy moviegoers.  Almost half of Latinos age 12 to 34 watch 11 or more movies a year (compared to 7 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early days of the Silver Screen, immigrant characters were not necessarily embraced.  Indeed, it wasn&#8217;t until Margarita Cansino changed her name to Rita Hayworth did she hit the big time.  Today, such a move would not be necessary, as attracting Hispanics is one path for a movie to become a blockbuster.  While Latinos make up about 15 percent of the U.S. population, they represent 28 percent of today&#8217;s heavy moviegoers.  Almost half of Latinos age 12 to 34 watch 11 or more movies a year (compared to 7 for whites and 8 for African-Americans), and half like to see movies within the first 10 days of release.</p>
<p>So what are they watching? Family and action adventure films are popular, but Hispanics command the highest share of audience in the horror/thriller and romantic comedy genres. And they are not just going to the cinema; Hispanic households are 24 percent more likely to purchase DVDs than the average American household.</p>
<p>By understanding the unique consumption habits of Hispanics, the movie industry can tailor a portion of its advertising to a box office constituency that can build brand awareness and success for movies to come.  Read more about the movie-going habits of Hispanics in the current edition of <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/July_2009/from_hayworth_to_cansino">Consumer Insight.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/reaching-the-hispanic-moviegoer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Potter: Wizard of All Media vs. Twilight Vampire</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/harry-potter-wizard-of-all-media-vs-twilight-vampire/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/harry-potter-wizard-of-all-media-vs-twilight-vampire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soundtrack sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vampires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With millions of copies sold, the Harry Potter book series does more than magically fly off the shelves, it has also been a force at the box office, on television, on the web, and even at the record stores. Similarly, a recent book series and film franchise, Twilight, has shown an ability to not only sell books, but also have an impact on the big screen and iPods as its brooding soundtrack has outsold the movie scores of the young wizard head to head. And while web buzz on Harry ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With millions of copies sold, the Harry Potter book series does more than magically fly off the shelves, it has also been a force at the box office, on television, on the web, and even at the record stores. Similarly, a recent book series and film franchise, <em>Twilight</em>, has shown an ability to not only sell books, but also have an impact on the big screen and iPods as its brooding soundtrack has outsold the movie scores of the young wizard head to head. And while web buzz on Harry Potter still rules, The Nielsen Company has long known the power of the sci-fi and vampire community online.</p>
<p>As the sixth movie in the Harry Potter franchise, <em>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</em>, is released this week, The Nielsen Company has prepared an overview of the impact of the two series across media.</p>
<h3>Book Sales*</h3>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_books.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13544" title="potter_books" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_books.png" alt="" width="500" height="553" /></a><br />
<span class="table_meta">*Includes all formats of the book (i.e. hardcover, paperback, audio, etc.).  Does not include sales prior to BookScan launch Janaury 2001.</span></p>
<h3>Box Office</h3>
<p>The first movie in the Harry Potter series, <em>Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone</em>, opened on 11/16/01 bringing in $90.1 million in its opening weekend, and going on to haul in a total of $317.6 million domestically.  The most recent release, 2007’s <em>Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix</em>, had the largest opening day total of the series with $44.2 million on Wednesday 7/11/07.  With each movie in the series debuting at #1 on its opening weekend and raking in $200+ million in the U.S, <em>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</em> has some pretty big goblets to fill.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_boxoffice.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13548" title="potter_boxoffice" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_boxoffice.png" alt="" width="500" height="163" /></a><br />
<span id="more-13543"></span><br />
Twilight has also proved popular among moviegoers as the first installment of the series took in $69.9 million and the top spot at the box office in its opening weekend and a domestic total of $191.4 million.</p>
<h3>Soundtrack</h3>
<p style="text-align: left;">Although both franchises include big-budget theatrical releases, the style of their soundtracks is worlds apart.  The Harry Potter soundtracks play more like the movie&#8217;s score with noted composer John Williams authoring the first three soundtracks in the series which have combined album sales of over a million copies to-date.  Twilight&#8217;s soundtrack includes a compilation of songs performed by popular artists &#8211; film&#8217;s star Robert Pattinson even recorded an original track &#8211; and has sold just over 2.1 million copies since its release.<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_albums.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-13547 aligncenter" title="potter_albums" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_albums.png" alt="" width="500" height="180" /></a></p>
<h3>Television</h3>
<p>So far this year Harry Potter movies have aired a total of 33 times on cable nets ABC Family, Disney Channel, HBO and Cinemax with ABC Family claiming four out of the five most-watched telecasts.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_telecast.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13545" title="potter_telecast" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_telecast.png" alt="" width="500" height="157" /></a></p>
<h3>Online Buzz</h3>
<p>Buzz tracking the two franchises shows that Harry Potter still dominates buzz, even amid the week where the <em>Twilight</em> movie is making its debut in the fall of 2008. [click to enlarge buzz graph]<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13559" title="potter_buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/potter_buzz.png" alt="" width="500" height="218" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/harry-potter-wizard-of-all-media-vs-twilight-vampire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Can Make Or Break A Movie</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/advertising-can-make-or-break-a-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/advertising-can-make-or-break-a-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slumdog Millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slumdog Millionaire, the Oscar winner for Best Picture in 2008 was not a summer blockbuster.  Nor were any of the other nominees in that category.  But they all had a couple of things in common: they were primarily advertised in the second half of the year with a concentration in the fourth quarter, and they were all released in the months of November and December.  So while the summer blockbusters get a great deal of attention, it is those films that are released &#8211; and tend to advertise &#8211; during ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/movie-theater-200x300.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-12415" title="movie-theater-200x300" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/movie-theater-200x300-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="105" height="105" /></a><em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>, the Oscar winner for Best Picture in 2008 was not a summer blockbuster.  Nor were any of the other nominees in that category.  But they all had a couple of things in common: they were primarily advertised in the second half of the year with a concentration in the fourth quarter, and they were all released in the months of November and December.  So while the summer blockbusters get a great deal of attention, it is those films that are released &#8211; and tend to advertise &#8211; during the last half of the year that get recognized by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts &amp; Sciences, according to recent review by Nielsen.</p>
<p>A review of Best Picture winners over the past five years reveals that only one film &#8211; <em>Crash</em>, which took home the award in the 2005 &#8211; was released outside the fourth quarter (it was released in early May).  But summer flicks hold their own when it comes to winning awards: the top 10 movies in 2008, based on advertising spending from May through August, included four films with nominations in other categories.  <em>Wall-E</em>, which was ranked third after spending over $38 million in advertising during this period, was nominated in six categories &#8211; and raked in $63.1 million box office sales.</p>
<p>Read more about how advertising can make or break a film in the latest issue of <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/june_2009/blockbuster_or_bust">Consumer Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/advertising-can-make-or-break-a-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top-10 Most-Watched Academy Awards Broadcasts</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-watched-academy-awards-broadcasts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-watched-academy-awards-broadcasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Award shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen&#8217;s list of the most-watched Oscar broadcasts since 1974:




RANK
DATE
NETWORK
BEST FILM
# OF VIEWERS P2+(MILLIONS)


1
3/23/1998
ABC
Titanic
55.2


2
4/11/1983
ABC
Gandhi
53.2


3
4/14/1980
ABC
Kramer vs. Kramer
49.0


4
4/3/1978
ABC
Annie Hall
48.5


5
3/27/1995
ABC
Forrest Gump
48.3


6
4/8/1975
NBC
GodfatherPart II
48.1


7
3/29/1976
ABC
One&#8230; Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest
46.8


8
3/26/2000
ABC
American Beauty
46.3


9
4/9/1979
ABC
Deer Hunter
46.3


10
3/29/1982
ABC
Chariots of Fire
46.2


source: The Nielsen Company (2009)




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen&#8217;s list of the most-watched <a href="http://www.oscar.com">Oscar</a> broadcasts since 1974:</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>DATE</th>
<th>NETWORK</th>
<th>BEST FILM</th>
<th># OF VIEWERS P2+(MILLIONS)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>3/23/1998</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Titanic</td>
<td>55.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>4/11/1983</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Gandhi</td>
<td>53.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>4/14/1980</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Kramer vs. Kramer</td>
<td>49.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>4/3/1978</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Annie Hall</td>
<td>48.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>3/27/1995</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Forrest Gump</td>
<td>48.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>4/8/1975</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>GodfatherPart II</td>
<td>48.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>3/29/1976</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>One&#8230; Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest</td>
<td>46.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>3/26/2000</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>American Beauty</td>
<td>46.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>4/9/1979</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Deer Hunter</td>
<td>46.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>3/29/1982</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>Chariots of Fire</td>
<td>46.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">source: The Nielsen Company (2009)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-watched-academy-awards-broadcasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Watch (Or Don&#8217;t Watch) Award Shows</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/why-we-watch-or-dont-watch-award-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/why-we-watch-or-dont-watch-award-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Award shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Movie buzz is up following the Golden Globes, SAG Awards and the nominations for the Academy Awards, but in recent years viewership for many award shows (including the Oscars) has actually been declining. Is it the host? The length of the broadcast? Or does it have something to do with the movies themselves?
According to a recent study by Nielsen Preview, viewership of the Academy Awards is directly impacted by the box office draw of the best picture nominees and the popularity of the host.
During the 2004 Academy Awards (hosted by ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/award-show-200x3001.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7556" title="award-show-200x3001" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/award-show-200x3001-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Movie buzz is up following the Golden Globes, SAG Awards and the nominations for the Academy Awards, but in recent years viewership for many award shows (including the Oscars) has actually been declining. Is it the host? The length of the broadcast? Or does it have something to do with the movies themselves?</p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1090">recent study</a> by Nielsen Preview, viewership of the Academy Awards is directly impacted by the box office draw of the best picture nominees and the popularity of the host.</p>
<p>During the 2004 Academy Awards (hosted by Billy Crystal), there was a 28% increase in households tuning in.  This was the year that &#8220;Lord of the Rings: Return of the King&#8221; was nominated (and won) best picture. A blockbuster hit, generating over $350M in revenues, the movie&#8217;s broad appeal translated to a strong ratings boost to nearly all demographics.</p>
<p>Host popularity and awareness, as defined by Nielsen EDI, also has a profound affect on ratings. The highest rating for women 18-24 was in 2007 &#8211;  the year Ellen Degeneres hosted.  Ellen&#8217;s appeal with women also buoyed ratings (which had fallen in prior years) among women 35-55+.</p>
<p>For more information and an outlook for the upcoming 2009 Academy Awards, <a href="http://www.nielsenpreview.com/member/study_detail.php?id=1090">click here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/why-we-watch-or-dont-watch-award-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

