<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Middle East</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/middle-east/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stock Up or Quick Trip: How Consumers Around the World Shop</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/stock-up-or-quick-trip-how-consumers-around-the-world-shop/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/stock-up-or-quick-trip-how-consumers-around-the-world-shop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypermarkets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While many consumers, particularly in North America, report stocking up as the primary reason for making a trip to the grocery store, that reason is not uniformly widespread across the globe, according to Nielsen’s 2011 Global Online Survey.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many consumers, particularly in North America, report stocking up as the primary reason for making a trip to the grocery store, that reason is not uniformly widespread across the globe, according to Nielsen’s 2011 <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html">Global Online Survey</a> of more than 25,000 Internet respondents across 51 countries. In fact, in several regions and markets, consumers indicate that most of their grocery store visits are initiated to either buy a few essential items or to quickly pick-up an item that needed replenishment. Factors such as the structure of trade, household size and refrigeration availability contributes to the differences in shopping frequency reported around the world.</p>
<p>By far, North Americans are the mostly likely to make a shopping trip to stock up on groceries, with 60 percent of North American consumers indicating their primary reason to make a trip is to stock up on staples. By contrast, 18 percent say they make a trip to pick up a few items, and just seven percent say they shop when they run out of something at home. “The impact of high gas prices in the U.S. has prompted consumers to combine errands and trips,” said Hale. “This trip consolidation has resulted in a reduction in small grocery trips in the U.S.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-5b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29448" title="value-over-price-5" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-5.png" alt="value-over-price-5" width="570" height="297" /></a></p>
<p>A more even distribution of shopping trip missions is reported in Europe, where 37 percent say they stock up on grocery trips, one-in-five (21%) shop when needing a few essential items, and 25 percent make a quick shopping trip when they run out of something at home. “Retail trip missions in Europe are dictated by store infrastructure,” said Jean-Jacques Vandenheede, Director Retailer Industry Insights, Nielsen. “In countries where shoppers have a high density of stores to choose from, such as in Italy or Germany, shoppers tend to shop more often. In countries that are dominated by hypermarkets with less retailer availability, stocking-up is the more dominant shopping pattern.”</p>
<p>Conversely, stocking up for groceries is less common in Asia Pacific, Latin America and in the Middle East/Africa where roughly one-in-five consumers say that is the primary reason for the shopping trip. Across both the Asia Pacific and Middle East/Africa regions, about one-third of online consumers say a quick trip for needed items is the primary reason for shopping trips (32% and 33%, respectively). A similar, but slightly smaller, number say trips are made to purchase a few essential items (28% of trips in Middle East/Africa and 29% of trips in Asia Pacific). Similarly, in Latin America, the most commonly reported reason for making a shopping trip among one-third of respondents is to pick up a few essential items and one-quarter say they make a quick trip to replenish.</p>
<p>For more detail and regional insights, download: <a title="Shopping and Saving Strategies Around the World" href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Shopping &amp; Saving Strategies Around the World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/stock-up-or-quick-trip-how-consumers-around-the-world-shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumers Around the World Favor Value Over Price</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-around-the-world-favor-value-over-price/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-around-the-world-favor-value-over-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online grocery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail and shopper strategies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumers around the world continue their broad efforts to save money at the checkout counter, but while low prices are important to shoppers, getting a good value for their money takes priority.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers around the world continue their broad efforts to save money at the checkout counter, but while low prices are important to shoppers, getting a good value for their money takes priority. Fully 61 percent of global online consumers rated “good value” over “low price” (58%) as the most influential reason to shop at a particular retailer, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s 2011 Global Online Survey</a> of more than 25,000 Internet respondents across 51 countries. <strong> </strong></p>
<p>The study shows that while factors relating to value and price are important drivers of where to shop and what to buy, retailers and manufacturers who offer good values—whether through sales and promotions or via larger-sized economy packaging—stand to gain the most from consumers who continue efforts to stretch their money in a tough economy.</p>
<p>The preference for value over lowest prices in retailer choice was found to be true in Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North  America, while slightly more Middle East/Africa respondents preferred lowest overall prices (59%) to good values (54%). Other attributes rated as “highly influential” by more than half of global online consumers were convenient location, great sales/promotions, well-stocked shelves and high-quality fresh produce.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-1b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29441" title="value-over-price-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-1.png" alt="value-over-price-1" width="570" height="386" /></a><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Bigger is Better &amp; Quality is Key</strong><br />
Commodity and raw material costs continue to rise, squeezing profit opportunities for producers and brands. For CPG manufacturers and retailers seeking direction on consumer demand, the study found a clear preference for strategies that increase value—even in the form of more expensive overall package prices.</p>
<p>When given the choice of either purchasing large value packs at a lower price per serving or smaller pack sizes at a lower cost, global online consumers voted 2:1 for the former. Thirty-six percent of global online respondents indicated they would prefer manufacturers to offer larger economy size packages, with lower prices per usage/serving. Half as many respondents (18%) said they would prefer new, smaller-sized packages at lower prices, and only about one-in-ten (12%) would prefer modestly downsized packages at the existing price level.</p>
<p>Roughly one-third of consumers in every region say they would prefer the larger, economy-sized packages, but the sentiment is most pronounced in North America, where 39 percent of consumers indicated a preference for value packs, 20 percent for smaller packages at lower prices, and 11 percent for modestly downsized packages at current prices. “However, in tough economic times and with wide fluctuations in commodity pricing, downsizing has been a successful strategy taken by manufacturers and retailers,” said Todd Hale, SVP Consumer &amp; Shopper Insights, Nielsen. “To remain profitable, retailers and manufacturers have a few choices: raise prices to cover input increases, modify ingredients to make products cost less to produce or downsize.”</p>
<p>Consumers around the world make it clear that quality is not to be compromised. Producing slightly lower quality products, but keeping prices the same is the least favored option among consumers in all regions. Raising prices is also a strategy that consumers do not embrace.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-2b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29443" title="value-over-price-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-2.png" alt="value-over-price-2" width="570" height="327" /></a></p>
<p>For more detail and regional insights, download: <a title="Shopping and Saving Strategies Around the World" href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Shopping &amp; Saving Strategies Around the World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-around-the-world-favor-value-over-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Ad Spending Shows Signs of Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-shows-signs-of-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-shows-signs-of-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. market, which faced six straight quarters of declines in ad spending, has seen a turnaround in 2010, with a 3.8 percent increase year-over-year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As global ad spending continues a steady climb to recovery in the first half of 2010, advertising in the world’s largest market is also seeing signs of growth, with a 3.8 percent increase in U.S. ad spending year-over-year, according to <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/content/nielsen/en_us/news/news_releases/2010/october/global_ad_spend_continuessteadyclimbtorecoverywith128percentrebo.html" target="_blank">figures released today</a> by The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>The U.S. market, which faced six straight quarters of declines in ad spending, has seen a turnaround in 2010. In total, advertisers spent an estimated $54 billion during the first half of 2010. The increase in U.S. advertising reflects a modest improvement in U.S. consumer confidence in the first half of the year, as advertisers look to highlight value deals and increase promotions in the hopes of spurring consumer spending.</p>
<p>However, with confidence still well below pre-recessionary levels, automotive was one of only a few bright spots in the top 10 product category ad spending.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">U.S. Ad Spend by Sector</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Category</th>
<th> Quarter 1, 2009 &#8211; Quarter 2, 2009-$$$</th>
<th> Quarter 1, 2010 &#8211; Quarter 2, 2010-$$$</th>
<th> % Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Automotive</td>
<td>3,491,438,000</td>
<td>4,431,709,000</td>
<td>26.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Pharmaceutical</td>
<td>2,090,707,000</td>
<td>1,998,762,000</td>
<td>-4.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Motion Picture</td>
<td>1,645,751,000</td>
<td>1,592,196,000</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Telephone Services &#8211; Wireless</td>
<td>1,758,535,000</td>
<td>1,518,600,000</td>
<td>-13.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Restaurant</td>
<td>805,082,000</td>
<td>824,978,000</td>
<td>2.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Restaurant &#8211; Quick Service</td>
<td>2,114,925,000</td>
<td>2,024,575,000</td>
<td>-4.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Dealerships</td>
<td>1,634,702,000</td>
<td>1,602,897,000</td>
<td>-1.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Department Store</td>
<td>1,516,520,000</td>
<td>1,591,149,000</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Products &#8211; Direct</td>
<td>933,141,000</td>
<td>828,155,000</td>
<td>-11.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Auto Insurance</td>
<td>623,212,000</td>
<td>764211,000</td>
<td>22.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>16,614,018,000</strong></td>
<td><strong>17,177,235,000</strong></td>
<td><strong>3.39%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Excludes Internet spending. Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Overall, there was a 3 percent increase in the top 10 product categories, with the largest growth by far seen in automotive (+27%) and auto insurance (+23%). The automotive advertising was driven largely by increased spending by General Motors which was up 73% over 1H09. Ford and Toyota also grew their ad spending by 15% and 22% respectively. An increase of 82% for UAW Health Care Trust contributed to the first half growth in the auto insurance category. All other categories, except department stores (+5%) and restaurants (+2%) showed declines in the first six months of the year.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/global-ad-spend-change.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24406" title="Regional Increases in Advertising Dollars Spent" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/global-ad-spend-change.png" alt="Regional Increases in Advertising Dollars Spent" width="475" height="350" /></a></p>
<p>“Not surprisingly, auto ad spending is closely tied to auto sales given that those sales dollars enable increased marketing expenditures,” said Sallie Hirsch, SVP of Research for Nielsen’s automotive unit. “Last year was abysmal for the auto industry as economic factors drove down sales to very low levels. Now that we’re seeing an improvement in the market and consumers are more willing to open their wallets, car sales have started to rebound and that’s what’s driving the increase in ad spending for 2010.”</p>
<p>Looking at ad spending across media types, U.S. television (network, cable, syndication, spot, Spanish Language network and Spanish Language cable) continues to dominate, accounting for $33.8 billion in advertising during the 1H10, a 6 percent increase over last year. Spanish language network TV and Cable TV in particular saw the biggest gains, up 24 percent and 13 percent respectively over 1H09.</p>
<p>Print media overall (national and local magazines, newspapers, Sunday supplements and B2B) was flat, however, national Sunday supplements received a significant uptick with 21.6 percent growth over last year. National newspapers were also up 10.8 percent. Alternatively, B2B and local Sunday supplements declined 19.2 percent and 12.1 percent respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">U.S. Ad Spend by Media Type</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Media Type</th>
<th> Jan-Jun 2009</th>
<th> Jan-Jun 2010</th>
<th> % Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Business to Business</td>
<td>$1,305,504,250</td>
<td>$1,054,525,521</td>
<td>-19.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cable TV</td>
<td>$8,063,091,000</td>
<td>$9,108,321,000</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">FSI Coupon</td>
<td>$246,535,406</td>
<td>$253,643,516</td>
<td>2.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Magazine</td>
<td>$215,200,797</td>
<td>$198,596,922</td>
<td>-7.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Newspaper</td>
<td>$5,175,683,500</td>
<td>$5,187,628,000</td>
<td>0.23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Sunday Supplement</td>
<td>$26,757,018</td>
<td>$23,533,229</td>
<td>-12.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Magazine</td>
<td>$7,261,397,500</td>
<td>$7,425,700,500</td>
<td>2.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Newspaper</td>
<td>$603,244,125</td>
<td>$668,556,625</td>
<td>10.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Sunday Supplement</td>
<td>$460,186,281</td>
<td>$559,376,875</td>
<td>21.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network Radio</td>
<td>$491,766,875</td>
<td>$494,776,188</td>
<td>0.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network TV</td>
<td>$10,587,809,000</td>
<td>$11,489,960,000</td>
<td>8.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Outdoor</td>
<td>$1,506,906,750</td>
<td>$1,530,320,000</td>
<td>1.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Cable TV</td>
<td>$205,042,672</td>
<td>$202,412,703</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Network TV</td>
<td>$1,326,478,750</td>
<td>$1,646,938,375</td>
<td>24.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot Radio</td>
<td>$2,572,394,500</td>
<td>$2,514,994,000</td>
<td>-2.23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot TV</td>
<td>$10,637,725,000</td>
<td>$10,292,083,000</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Syndicated TV</td>
<td>$1,096,335,750</td>
<td>$1,107,379,875</td>
<td>1.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>$51,782,059,174</strong></td>
<td><strong>$53,758,746,329</strong></td>
<td><strong>3.82%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Excludes Internet spending. Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-shows-signs-of-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Health &amp; Beauty Trends</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-health-beauty-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-health-beauty-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Online Consumer Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health and beauty aids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen probed consumers' attitudes towards health and beauty products—where they purchased them and what factors went into their buying decisions—as part of its Global Online Survey of more than 27,000 people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/beauty2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24072" title="Beauty" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/beauty2.jpg" alt="Beauty" width="563" height="151" /></a><br />
<strong>Beauty on a Budget</strong><br />
With consumers around the world cutting back on discretionary expenses during the recession, Nielsen probed consumers’ attitudes towards health and beauty (H&amp;B) products—where they purchased them and what factors went into their buying decisions—as part of its Global Online Survey of more than 27,000 people across 55 countries in the first quarter of 2010. And while views and habits differ by region, there’s one thing in common: people continue to place importance on looking good and feeling their best.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Universal Appeal</strong><br />
Virtually all online survey respondents in Latin America (96%) and Asia Pacific (92%) said they purchased H&amp;B products, along with 90% of people around the world who made up the global average. But what prompts consumers to stock their cabinets with make-up, fragrances and personal care items?</p>
<p>For 44% of global respondents, it was the lure of the product’s promise. A pragmatic 69% of respondents said they were influenced by price, while 58% said they bought as a result of a personal recommendation. Magazine articles, Internet buzz and traditional ads all factored into the purchase equation as well.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_influence.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24070" title="Price, Preferred Brand and Friends Are Biggest Influencers of Health &amp; Beauty Products" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_influence.jpg" alt="Price, Preferred Brand and Friends Are Biggest Influencers of Health &amp; Beauty Products" width="575" height="412" /></a><br />
Product samples helped about half of consumers along the buying path, as did the suggestion of a partner. But aside from price, the reason most consumers (65%) offered up for buying health and beauty products was the influence of their preferred brand.</p>
<p>Half of Asia Pacific respondents indicated that the Internet was a purchasing influence—the highest percent of any region. These consumers were also swayed by magazine articles (45%) and advertising campaigns (44%) more than other region. Conversely, European and North American beauty product choices were the least influenced by print and television ads, magazine editorial or the Internet and were most influenced by price; 82% of North Americans and 70% of Europeans agreed that price was a key determining factor.</p>
<p>Latin Americans said they were most persuaded by their preferred brand (72%) and free samples (60%). Middle Eastern survey takers reported the most balanced responses, giving fairly equal weight across all influencers. They were, however, least influenced by the product’s promise (36%) and most by their preferred brand (63%).</p>
<p><strong>Channel Choices</strong><br />
Far and away, supermarkets were the format of choice for 60% of global respondents, with the drugstore/chemist/pharmacy a distant second destination at 39%, specialty stores in third place at 33% and the Internet trailing at 22%.</p>
<p>Asia Pacific shoppers scored the highest of any region (33%) to say they shop the Internet for health and beauty products—more than double Europeans (15%), Latin Americans (14%), North Americans (11%) and Middle Easterners (9%). Specialty stores were the destination of choice for 40% of Latin American and Asia Pacific shoppers and 95% of Middle Eastern shoppers say they buy health and beauty products from just two channels—supermarkets (56%) and drugstores (39%).</p>
<p><strong>Mass vs. Premium: Looking Good Enough</strong><br />
A question for the ages: can mass market cosmetics successfully sell against more expensive, premium brands in such an image-intensive category tied to personal vanity and ego? Yes, although the degree of success varies by product type. Global results for hair products showed that 81% of online respondents think mass market hair products are a viable alternative, while 75% find mass market skincare products acceptable, and 72% believed mass market cosmetics were suitable.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_massmarket.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24071" title="Most Consumers Agree: Mass-Market Health &amp; Beauty Products are Just As Good As Expensive Alternatives" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_massmarket.jpg" alt="Most Consumers Agree: Mass-Market Health &amp; Beauty Products are Just As Good As Expensive Alternatives" width="575" height="382" /></a><br />
North American respondents were the most positive about mass-market health and beauty products, viewing them as good substitutes, while Middle Eastern and Asia Pacific survey takers were the least enamored with the off-market products.</p>
<p><strong>Region Round-Up</strong><br />
In almost all Latin American countries included in this survey, sales for personal care products reported volume increases during the latest rolling year ending June 2010 versus year ago: Chile +7.2%, Argentina +4.7%, Brazil +3.4%, Mexico +3.4% and Colombia +3.3%. Only Venezuela showed a negative trend, declining 2.5%.</p>
<p>In the U.S., dollar growth for the health and beauty department for the year ending July 2010 is flat (0.3%) and units have declined 2% as the economy is driving consumers to make tradeoffs and buy less. However, sales in the June and July 2010 period are improving as retailers are raising prices to enhance margins. In Canada, rising prices have fueled an increase in health and beauty (excluding baby and OTC) dollar sales of 3.2%, which outpaced the total market (+2.6%) while units were flat.</p>
<p>In Asia, consumers started to switch back into purchasing personal care, healthy and more premium products in the second half of 2009. This trend is expected to continue with the improving consumer confidence in the region.</p>
<p>The never-ending quest for beauty and perfection bodes well for the H&amp;B sector. In countries that have emerged from the recession with vigor, the sector is likely to thrive. Meanwhile, in those regions where the recovery is still shaky—or in doubt altogether—health and beauty product manufacturers and retailers need to know exactly what’s important to those consumers: value for money and high quality products that enable them to look good, despite life’s pressures.</p>
<p><strong>Note about online survey methodology</strong><br />
<em>While online survey methodology allows for tremendous scale and global reach, it provides the perspectives on the habits of existing Internet users, not total populations. Where noted, the Nielsen Global Online Survey data is supplemented with consumption data by market.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-health-beauty-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Consumer Strategies for Saving Money</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-strategies-for-saving-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-strategies-for-saving-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company conducted an online survey in March 2010 of more than 27,000 consumers in 55 markets to get a better sense of the steps being taken to save money in view of uncertain economic conditions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23812" title="Save" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save2.jpg" alt="Save" width="563" height="151" /></a></p>
<p>It was the rare household that didn’t change spending habits over the last 18 months. Faced with unemployment (or even the prospect of it), higher expenses and crushing debts, consumers around the globe used a number of tactics to stretch their money further to get the most bang for the buck.</p>
<p>The Nielsen Company conducted an online survey in March 2010 of more than 27,000 consumers in 55 markets from Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, North America and the Middle East/Africa (consisting of countries from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, Egypt and South Africa) to get a better sense of the steps being taken to save money in view of uncertain economic conditions.</p>
<p>What’s more, while recovery has taken hold in some regions (Asia Pacific and Latin America in particular), in other regions it has been tentative. Regardless, one thing remains clear: habits picked up during the recession are likely to survive even after economic recovery is in full-swing.</p>
<p><strong>Value Strategies Help Savvy Consumers Save</strong><br />
In addition to a shift toward <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-global-staying-power-of-private-label/">private label products</a>, global online survey respondents saved money on household expenses in a number of ways, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Buying items on sale (a 57% global average)</li>
<li>Using coupons (40%)</li>
<li>Shopping at value retailers (37%), such as supercenters and dollar stores</li>
<li>Purchasing value packs (35%)</li>
<li>Shopping close to home/work (25%)</li>
<li>Stocking up (22%)</li>
<li>Switching to cheaper health and beauty products (18%)</li>
<li>Purchasing smaller packs with a lower unit price (17%)</li>
</ul>
<p>One in 10 consumers in the online study reported no belt-tightening practices in their household.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save-household-expenses.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23814" title="save-household-expenses" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save-household-expenses.jpg" alt="save-household-expenses" width="575" height="281" /></a></p>
<p>North Americans led the world in cost-cutting strategies and adopted a host of budget-shrinking tactics. Seven in ten respondents said they bought items on sale, which is 13% more than the global average. Both Asia Pacific (46%) and North American (59%) consumers indicated they presented coupons at a checkout, outstripping the 40% global average.</p>
<p>In the U.S. in particular, manufacturer coupon redemption hit record highs in 2009 after years of no growth or declining growth. Meanwhile, Canadians continued to shift spending to discount or value retailers—now accounting for over one-third of total grocery sales—as their neighbors to the south have done so over the past several years.  Whether prompted by high gas prices or environmental sensitivity, North American respondents were also the most likely to say they shop in stores close to home or the office.</p>
<p>Value packs and stock-up shopping trips were a popular option across regions, with consumers in Middle East/Africa/Pakistan and Europeans lagging slightly behind the global benchmark. Middle East/Africa/Pakistan consumers also had the lowest incidence of using coupons (11%), shopping on promotion (42%), patronizing value retailers (21%) or stocking up to save (12%). The use of coupons as a promotion tool is not a popular marketing method in the region. Additionally, the dearth of established retailers in the Middle East and Pakistan explains the low incidence of patronage.</p>
<p>Roughly one-quarter of Latin (23%) and North Americans (24%) said they sacrificed beauty at the budget altar by switching to cheaper health and beauty products. Asia Pacific and Middle East/Africa/Pakistan respondents were less likely than average to say they made such a switch to save money (15%).</p>
<p><strong>Cash is King; Dining In Trend Heats Up</strong><br />
Consumers found other ways to cope with the cash crunch as well. While 19% of the regions admitted to using credit cards more often, North America at 10% and Europe at 11% were well off that global average pace. Further supporting the belt-tightening approach, 31% of North Americans and 30% of Latin Americans said they recorded less credit card utilization versus the prior year, while only 20% of Europeans did, despite a precarious economic picture.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save_creditcards.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23815" title="Compared to Last Year, I am Using Credit Cards to Make Purchases..." src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save_creditcards.jpg" alt="Compared to Last Year, I am Using Credit Cards to Make Purchases..." width="575" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>Foregoing credit was just one consumer coping mechanism. Based on survey findings, restaurants in some countries must be hungry for clients, as more than half of survey respondents said they ate out of the home less often than the year before. The dine-in trend was particularly strong in Latin America, North America, Europe and the Middle East.</p>
<p>Roughly one-fourth of residents of Indonesia, China, the Philippines, Hong Kong and India indicated that they were eating out more often than usual. Asia Pacific as a whole showed a 5% higher rate for eating out than the global average.</p>
<p>Dining out cutbacks appear to correlate with private label purchase patterns, with five of the top 10 “dining out less often” countries also landing on the top 10 “purchased more private label” list: Greece, Ireland, Spain, Turkey and Portugal—countries that continue to face significant economic challenges even as other parts of the world resume growth.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Note about online survey methodology</span><br />
<em>While online survey methodology allows for tremendous scale and global reach, it provides the perspectives on the habits of existing Internet users, not total populations. Where noted, the Nielsen Global Online Survey data is supplemented with consumption data by market.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-strategies-for-saving-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Global Staying Power of Private Label</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-global-staying-power-of-private-label/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-global-staying-power-of-private-label/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private label]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While improving economies may prompt consumers to return to restaurants or take a vacation, one trend that looks likely to remain—and perhaps even grow—is the shift to private label goods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/value_landing.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23712" title="value_landing" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/value_landing.jpg" alt="value_landing" width="563" height="151" /></a></p>
<p>Shoppers around the world took many steps to stretch their budgets during the recession such as eating at home more frequently or cutting back on vacations.  While improving economies may prompt consumers to return to restaurants or take a vacation, one trend that looks likely to remain—and perhaps even grow—is the shift to private label goods.</p>
<p>A 2010 global online survey conducted by The Nielsen Company reveals that 60% of consumers across 55 countries from Asia Pacific, Europe, North America, Latin America and Middle East/Africa (consisting of countries from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, Egypt and South Africa), say they are stocking cupboards with more store brands as a result of the economic downturn. Across the regions, Latin America led the way at 66% and the Middle East/Africa/Pakistan area trailed at 51%.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/private-label-brands1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23705" title="private-label-brands" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/private-label-brands1.jpg" alt="private-label-brands" width="575" height="388" /></a></p>
<p>The highest levels of private label purchase intent during the economic downturn were reported by consumers in Colombia, Spain, Portugal and Greece at 80%, 79%, 74% and 70% respectively, reflecting recessionary realities, depressed export activity and raging deficits. Meanwhile, the lowest reported drift toward private label came from consumers in Sweden (70%), Thailand (62%), Hong Kong (60%) and Denmark (59%) who indicated they did not purchase more store brands during the recession.</p>
<p>While econometric pressures are driving many value-oriented consumer shopping decisions, it is just one factor influencing private label purchasing. A strong push from retailers and improvements in both quality and selection are contributing factors. It should also be noted that not all private label categories are alike. Store brand share varies widely by category and they still represent the minority stake when compared to premium brands.</p>
<p>Store brand share is typically strongest in commodity categories like milk, fresh eggs, rice, edible oil, vinegar and sugar/substitutes or in those with little differentiation (first aid and wrapping materials). Store brand share is usually the lowest among categories where there is strong marketing support for top brands (e.g., candy, gum, beer) and those where a high-level of innovation occurs (e.g., detergents, deodorant, cosmetics).</p>
<p><strong>Staying Power</strong><br />
Fully 88% of shoppers globally said they intend to keep buying private label even after the economy improves, suggesting that store brand quality has reached parity with national brands and delivers on consumer expectations. While Latin American and Middle East/Africa levels were slightly less than the global average at 83% and 79% respectively, the overwhelming majority still intended to pursue a value strategy.</p>
<p>Countries with the most value-conscious consumers on the private label dimension included Austria, Germany and Sweden, all registering a better than 95% intent to continue purchasing private label, while more than one-quarter of shoppers in the Ukraine (31%), Pakistan (28%), the United Arab Emirates (27%) and Venezuela (27%) had no intention to buy private label in the future.</p>
<p>The economic downturn prompted many consumers to try private label goods for the first time, and once they did so, they discovered that not only was the pricing right, but the quality of the goods met or exceeded expectations. Regardless of the pace of economic recovery, retailers continue to have a tremendous opportunity to convert shoppers to private label for the long term.</p>
<h3><strong>Regional Round-Up</strong></h3>
<p><strong>Asia Pacific</strong><br />
In most Asian markets, private label is still relatively undeveloped with only Hong Kong having a share above 5% overall. There has been significant investment by many leading retail chains into launching new private label products over the last five years and they are gaining acceptance particularly in the basic commodity categories. In these categories, such as cooking oil, rice, bathroom tissue, market shares can reach up to between 20% and 30% in some countries.</p>
<p>Asian consumers are still largely brand loyal and retailers will need to increase their private label marketing support to build consumer trust in their own brands. During the economic downturn in 2009, there was strong private label growth in many countries. For example, in Thailand, private label grew by over 25%, as shoppers increasingly looked for value when buying grocery products.</p>
<p>In the Pacific markets of Australia and New Zealand, private label is much more established with the majority of households regularly purchasing private label products, which account for up to one-quarter of all supermarket sales.</p>
<p><strong>Latin America</strong><br />
Private label continues to have a stable presence in the region. In Chile, store brands represent 8.4% of the market as of April 2010. Market share remained relatively flat in Argentina and Mexico, reporting shares of 7.6% and 6.6% respectively during the rolling year ending April 2010. While Mexico&#8217;s private label market share was flat, sales grew 23% compared with the previous period (April 2009). Store brands in Brazil have 4.9% of importance (YTD April 2010).</p>
<p>The categories where private label market share are strongest varies dramatically by country. In Argentina, the top five categories are dominated by foods such as fish, pasta, ice cream and vegetables, while in Chile, four out of the top five are non-food categories (clothes hooks, candles, pots/pans and cotton swabs). In Mexico, sugar and pies hold the greatest market share, but disposable plates, glasses and place settings round out the top five.</p>
<p><strong>Europe</strong><br />
Private label continues to show solid performance in most European nations, with Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Germany leading the way reporting 2009 store brand value shares of 46%, 43% and 32% respectively. While year-over-year growth was relatively flat or minimal, Turkey and Spain boasted the biggest year-over-year increases of 2.7% and 2.5% respectively.</p>
<p><strong>North America</strong><br />
Private label has taken off in the U.S. For year ending July 2010, store brand unit sales reached an average 22% share across all departments, with share gains in all but dairy. Store brand unit shares range from a high of 40% in the dairy department to a low of less than 1% in alcoholic beverages.</p>
<p>In Canada, private label represented $11.4 billion in national sales for year ending July 2010, which is 18.3% of overall consumer packaged goods spend. Over the past year, private label share has declined slightly with overall dollar sales flat, while the total market increased +3%.</p>
<p><strong>Middle East</strong><br />
Middle Eastern consumption patterns often run counter to the West for a variety of reasons, and respondents in the region indicated the least likelihood of purchasing private label today or after economic recovery. However, as awareness has increased over the last few years, volume is growing—albeit from a very small base. While only 18% of shoppers in the United Arab Emirates perceive private label as a better value for the money, certain categories such as household cleaners are regarded more favorably. Fully, one-fourth (26%) of shoppers in Saudi Arabia consider these store brands as worthy.</p>
<p><strong>Note about online survey methodology</strong><em><br />
While online survey methodology allows for tremendous scale and global reach, it provides the perspectives on the habits of existing Internet users, not total populations. Where noted, the Nielsen Global Online Survey data is supplemented with measurement of private label consumption by market.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-global-staying-power-of-private-label/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Online Shopping Report</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-online-shopping-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-online-shopping-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it’s still nice to stop by a store to touch and see products, the convenience of online shopping can’t be beat. And for some services, such as booking travel or buying concert tickets, the ability to do so online has made the process much easier and more efficient.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet has transformed many aspects of life, but perhaps none more so than how we shop for goods and services. While it’s still nice to stop by a store to touch and see products, the convenience of online shopping can’t be beat. And for some services, such as booking travel or buying concert tickets, the ability to do so online has made the process much easier and more efficient.</p>
<p>The Nielsen Company conducted a survey in March 2010 and polled more than 27,000 Internet users in 55 markets from Asia Pacific, Europe, Middle East, North America and South America to look at how consumers shop online: what they intend to buy, how they use various sites, the impact of social media and other factors that come into play when they are trying to decide how to spend their money. What we found was that there are some products bought online that are universal, and others that still have yet to build a significant share of trade. Further, while checking online reviews are popular for some products—particularly consumer electronics and cars—shoppers still trust the recommendations of friends and family most.</p>
<p><strong>Opinions Count</strong><br />
One of the great benefits of online shopping is the ability read others&#8217; reviews of a product, be they experts or simply fellow shoppers. These opinions are most important when it comes to purchasing consumer electronics: 57 percent of online respondents consider reviews prior to buying. Reviews on cars (45%) and software (37%) rounded out the top three most important online influences when making a purchase.</p>
<p>Online reviews and peer recommendations also played a key role for shoppers researching future purchases of consumer electronics, cars and travel, and 40 percent of online shoppers indicate they would not even buy electronics without consulting online reviews first.</p>
<p>Pity the product or retailer that consumers don’t like: while most online consumers (59%) said that they are not more likely to share a negative product experience online via Twitter or writing a review, 41 percent would.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/online-shopping-review.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-22698  aligncenter" title="online-shopping-review" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/online-shopping-review.png" alt="online-shopping-review" width="492" height="483" /></a></p>
<p>For more insights, download the complete report: <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2010/Global-Trends-in-Online-Shopping-Nielsen-Consumer-Report.html">Global Trends in Online Shopping</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-online-shopping-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s A Recession, Consumers Agree &#8212; But Until When?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/its-a-recession-consumers-agree-but-until-when/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/its-a-recession-consumers-agree-but-until-when/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carry-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheaper grocery brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtail spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discretionary spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic turmoil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record low consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take-away]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=3488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most global consumers agree that their countries have hit recession, but opinion on how long the recession will last remains mixed, Nielsen reported Wednesday.
While 53% of those surveyed by Nielsen think their country has hit a prolonged recession that will last more than 12 months, 18% of consumers, concentrated in a handful of emerging markets, like India, Vietnam, China, and Russia, told Nielsen they expect their countries to be out of recession within the next 12 months.
In contrast, consumers in Japan, Germany, Argentina, Mexico, Turkey, Italy, Taiwan, the U.S., and Spain were the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sell_stock-ticker.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3542" title="sell_stock-ticker" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sell_stock-ticker-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>Most global consumers agree that their countries have <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/63recessionslide.pdf">hit recession</a>, but opinion on how long the recession will last remains mixed, Nielsen <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/press_release_final1.pdf">reported</a> Wednesday.</p>
<p>While <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/53recessionendslide.pdf">53% of those surveyed</a> by Nielsen think their country has hit a prolonged recession that will last more than 12 months, 18% of consumers, concentrated in a handful of <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/emergingmarkets_shortrecession.pdf">emerging markets</a>, like India, Vietnam, China, and Russia, told Nielsen they expect their countries to be out of recession within the next 12 months.</p>
<p>In contrast, consumers in Japan, Germany, Argentina, Mexico, Turkey, Italy, Taiwan, the U.S., and Spain were the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/longrecession.pdf">least optimistic</a> about the prospects for quick economic recovery.</p>
<p>Nielsen surveyed 28,663 Internet users in 52 markets across Europe, Asia Pacific, the Americas, and the Middle East between September 22 and October 6, 2008, as part of its Global Online Consumer Survey.</p>
<p><span id="more-3488"></span></p>
<p>The survey&#8217;s results reveal that global consumer confidence <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ccindex.pdf">fell to a new low</a> this month, dropping from an index of 88 in May 2008 &#8211; previously the lowest index on record &#8211; to 84 in October, according to Nielsen.  Only Brazil, the Philippines, New Zealand, China, Thailand, South Africa, and Hungary showed <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/topccindexes_bycountry.pdf">improved consumer confidence</a>, compared with May 2008.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, consumers worldwide are adopting <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/howusesparecashslides.pdf">new strategies</a> to reduce discretionary spending and shore up household finances.<br />
 <br />
On average, 49% of global consumers plan to spend less on new clothing, as well as gas and electricity, according to Nielsen. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, 47% report reducing out-of-home entertainment, 40% say they&#8217;ll delay upgrading to new PCs and mobile phones, and 39% will cut down on take-away meals from restaurants. </p>
<p>Even necessities, like groceries, are on the chopping block &#8212; 36% of global consumers report switching to cheaper grocery brands in order to reduce their expenses.</p>
<p>Overall, consumers in Australia, New Zealand, Germany, the U.K., Turkey, the U.S., Colombia, and Argentina plan to make the most changes in their spending habits, as they search for ways to weather the current economic turmoil.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/press_release_final.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read a related press release on consumer confidence in <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/press_release2.pdf" target="_blank">Hong Kong</a> and <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gb_release.pdf">Great Britain</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings by <a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Business/Consumer-Confidence-In-The-UK-Falls-To-New-Record-Lows-According-To-New-Survey/Article/200811215148256?f=rss" target="_blank">Sky News</a> and in the <a href="http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/?id=380411&amp;type=Business" target="_blank">Shanghai Daily</a>, the <a href="http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=340018" target="_blank">Business Standard</a> (India), <a href="http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2008/11/06/afx5655565.html" target="_blank">Forbes</a>, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/5f6e3c1c-a55a-11dd-b4f5-000077b07658,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F5f6e3c1c-a55a-11dd-b4f5-000077b07658.html&amp;_i_referer=" target="_blank">Financial Times</a>, <a href="http://www.chinapost.com.tw/asia/regional-news/2008/11/08/182244/Indians-Indonesians.htm" target="_blank">The China Post</a>, the <a href="http://www.thanhniennews.com/commentaries/?catid=11&amp;newsid=43603" target="_blank">Thanh Nien Daily</a>, and the <a href="http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/11/7/business/2474318&amp;sec=business" target="_blank">Malaysia Star</a>.</p>
<p>Learn more about global consumer confidence levels in the <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/issue_13/times_are_not_as_tough" target="_blank">December 2008 issue</a> of Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/insights/consumer_insight/issue_13/times_are_not_as_tough" target="_blank">&#8220;Consumer Insight&#8221;</a> online newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/its-a-recession-consumers-agree-but-until-when/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

