<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Michigan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/michigan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vehicle Purchase Intent Not Tied To State Unemployment Rate</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vehicle-purchase-intent-not-tied-to-state-unemployment-rate/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vehicle-purchase-intent-not-tied-to-state-unemployment-rate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loyalty programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Julie A. Enzweiler, Automotive – Research Director
One might assume that the unemployment rate at a state level would show a strong negative correlation to the likelihood to purchase a vehicle in the next six months, but this doesn&#8217;t appear to be the case.  Michigan had the highest unemployment rate at 11.6% in January 2009; however, these residents are slightly over-indexing for the likeliness to purchase a vehicle in the next six months.  It&#8217;s very interesting that Mississippi is the most likely state to purchase a vehicle and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9562" title="car keys" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/car_key.png" alt="" width="150" height="120" />By <a href="http://nielsen-online.com/blog/category/julie-enzweiler/">Julie A. Enzweiler</a>, Automotive – Research Director</p>
<p>One might assume that the unemployment rate at a state level would show a strong negative correlation to the likelihood to purchase a vehicle in the next six months, but this doesn&#8217;t appear to be the case.  Michigan had the highest unemployment rate at 11.6% in January 2009; however, these residents are slightly over-indexing for the likeliness to purchase a vehicle in the next six months.  It&#8217;s very interesting that Mississippi is the most likely state to purchase a vehicle and Idaho is the least likely, since both states fall in the middle of the heap for unemployment.</p>
<h3>January 2009 Unemployment Rate Vs. Likelihood To Purchase A Vehicle</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9567" title="auto purchase vs. unemployment" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/auto_unemployment.png" alt="" width="525" height="379" /></p>
<p>Solely looking at shopping intention by state is too high of a level to glean any actionable insight.  However, coupling intention with current vehicle ownership allows for smarter inventory planning and target marketing within each state.  Typically, we would be a bit more aggressive and aim to conquest more sales, but in the current economic condition we need to be more cognizant of advertising expenditures and ensure a high ROI.</p>
<p>In 2009 it will be imperative that automakers focus on the total customer experience of existing owners and consider developing loyalty programs.  It is much easier and cheaper to retain an owner than it is to make a conquest from a competing brand.  Nielsen @Plan data is indicating that Oklahoma residents are the second most likely to purchase a vehicle in the next six months and are also over-indexing on owning a Kia vehicle and Compact Sedans/Coupes.  There appears to be an opportunity for Kia to gain additional market share within Oklahoma especially with the Optima and Spectra.  Lincoln also has an opportunity in Mississippi with an ownership index of 286, while Chrysler may want to reduce their ad spend in this state and shift focus to areas that have a higher concentration of Chrysler owners such as Iowa, Kentucky and Michigan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vehicle-purchase-intent-not-tied-to-state-unemployment-rate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and McCain&#8217;s Ads: Equally &#8220;Negative&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[527 groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battleground states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swing states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite finger-pointing from both sides, Barack Obama and John McCain&#8217;s presidential campaigns have run almost the same number of negative local campaign ads, Nielsen Monitor-Plus reported Thursday.
From June 3, when the primaries ended, through Sept. 7, the most recent reporting period, the McCain campaign ran 76,192 negative ads against Obama.  During the same time period, the Obama campaign placed 75,246 negative commercials against McCain.
Negative advertising by both candidates and the “527” groups that support them has concentrated in the top battleground states, led by Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.




Rank
(By # Of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1940" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/election2008_button2-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Despite finger-pointing from both sides, Barack Obama and John McCain&#8217;s presidential campaigns have run almost the same number of negative local campaign ads, Nielsen Monitor-Plus reported Thursday.</p>
<p>From June 3, when the primaries ended, through Sept. 7, the most recent reporting period, the McCain campaign ran 76,192 negative ads against Obama.  During the same time period, the Obama campaign placed 75,246 negative commercials against McCain.</p>
<p>Negative advertising by both candidates and the “527” groups that support them has concentrated in the top battleground states, led by Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.</p>
<p><span id="more-1937"></span></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(By # Of Ads)</th>
<th>State</th>
<th># Of McCain Negative Ads<br />
Placed By Obama &amp; 527s</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Ohio</td>
<td>11,037</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Michigan</td>
<td>10,397</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Wisconsin</td>
<td>8,974</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pennsylvania</td>
<td>8,569</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Colorado</td>
<td>4,332</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Florida</td>
<td>4,112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Missouri</td>
<td>3,899</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Nevada</td>
<td>3,741</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Virginia</td>
<td>3,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Iowa</td>
<td>3,170</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(By # Of Ads)</th>
<th>State</th>
<th># Of Obama Negative Ads<br />
Placed By McCain &amp; 527s</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Ohio</td>
<td>14,397</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Michigan</td>
<td>12,292</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Pennsylvania</td>
<td>11,363</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Wisconsin</td>
<td>10,005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Iowa</td>
<td>7,172</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Colorado</td>
<td>6,016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Nevada</td>
<td>4,766</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Missouri</td>
<td>4,305</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>New Mexico</td>
<td>2,106</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>West Virginia</td>
<td>1,970</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The three commercials used most frequently by each candidate&#8217;s campaigns aired more than 10,000 times each.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 3 McCain Ads Against Obama</th>
<th># Of Commercials Placed On Local TV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; Obama/ Spending/Budget/ Taxes/ Men</td>
<td>16,354</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; Obama/ Higher Taxes/ Foreign Oil</td>
<td>16,215</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; Obama/ Gas / Domestic Drilling</td>
<td>10,760</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Top 3 Obama Ads Against McCain</th>
<th># Of Commercials Placed On Local TV</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; McCain/ Iraq War/ Oil/ Economy</td>
<td>11,140</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; McCain/ Housing/ Economy</td>
<td>10,187</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Negative &#8211; McCain/ Economy/ Taxes/ Iraq War</td>
<td>10,074</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 3, 2008 &#8211; September 7, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View each candidate&#8217;s top negative ad below.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/163476" target="_blank">Newsweek</a>, <a href="http://adage.com/campaigntrail/post?article_id=131443&amp;search_phrase=%22nielsen%22" target="_blank">AdAge</a>, the Chicago Tribune&#8217;s <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/obama_v_mccain_adwar_hits_both.html" target="_blank">&#8220;The Swamp&#8221;</a> political blog, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/10/03/months_later_obama_strikes_new_tone_in_mich/" target="_blank">The Boston Globe</a>, and the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-campaign3-2008oct03,0,1290211.story" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a>.</p>
<p>McCain Ad: Expensive Plans<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4QH9_jhMOBY&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4QH9_jhMOBY&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Obama Ad: Book<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7KYSeGl4bks&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7KYSeGl4bks&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

