<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; metered markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/metered-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Market Madness: Louisville TV Homes Score Big During NCAA Tourney</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/market-madness-louisville-tv-homes-score-big-during-ncaa-tourney/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/market-madness-louisville-tv-homes-score-big-during-ncaa-tourney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March Madness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metered markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA Tournament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For fans of NCAA basketball, it has been an upset-filled start to March Madness. But there are no surprises in household viewing patterns in the top markets tracked by Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For fans of NCAA basketball, it has been an upset-filled March Madness. But there are no surprises in household viewing patterns among the top markets tracked by Nielsen. More than a quarter of households in the Louisville, KY, market tuned into watch the University of Kentucky defeat Cornell on March 25. The Louisville market is once again the highest-rated DMA for NCAA tournament games, averaging a 16.6 household rating through the first two rounds.  While Louisville is a mid-sized market with no pro sports teams, it dominates NCAA viewership and is at the heart of a &#8220;basketball belt,&#8221; an enthusiastic cluster of markets from Raleigh to Oklahoma City that boast nine of the top 10 DMAs in tournament viewing.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ncaa-dma.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21007" title="ncaa-dma" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ncaa-dma.png" alt="ncaa-dma" width="575" height="600" /></a></p>
<p>Louisville also has the highest average viewership for the NCAA championship game the past 10 years. Historically, viewership hasn&#8217;t wavered despite the fact that neither the University of Louisville nor the University of Kentucky have sent teams to the championship game since 1998.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top 10 Markets for NCAA Viewing (through March 21, 2010)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Market</th>
<th> 2010 HH Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Louisville</td>
<td>16.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Columbus, OH</td>
<td>14.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Kansas City</td>
<td>14.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Indianapolis</td>
<td>12.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Cincinnati</td>
<td>11.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Dayton</td>
<td>11.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Knoxville</td>
<td>10.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>10.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Raleigh-Durham (Fayetvlle)</td>
<td>9.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Albuquerque-Santa Fe</td>
<td>8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Further analysis shows that Louisville is more than just a college basketball town.  When compared to the rest of the U.S., the &#8220;Derby City,&#8221; is roughly three times more likely to watch horse racing&#8217;s Triple Crown (including the Kentucky Derby, obviously) and is twice as likely to view the Indy 500 and Daytona 500.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Louisville, KY &#8211; Sports Viewing Index*</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Event</th>
<th> Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Kentucky Derby &#8211; 2009</td>
<td>338</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NCAA &#8211; 2010</td>
<td>313</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Belmont- 2009</td>
<td>292</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Preakness- 2009</td>
<td>289</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Indy 500 &#8211; 2009</td>
<td>217</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Daytona 500- 2010</td>
<td>188</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">US Tennis Open- 2009</td>
<td>137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</p>
<p>*Where U.S. average is 100</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/market-madness-louisville-tv-homes-score-big-during-ncaa-tourney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More U.S. Viewers, Households For 2008-09 TV Season</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-viewers-households-up-sligtly-in-2008-09-tv-season/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-viewers-households-up-sligtly-in-2008-09-tv-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Designated Market Areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metered markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total U.S. television viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total U.S. TV households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe estimates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The total number of U.S. television households for the 2008-2009 TV season has grown to 114.5 million &#8212; up 1.5% from last year, Nielsen reported Thursday.
U.S. television viewers also increased by 1.3%, to a total of nearly 290 million people (age two and older), with older viewers (age 55+) showing the fastest growth rate (+2.7%).
The new figures, Nielsen&#8217;s TV Universe Estimate for the 2008-2009 TV season, will be reflected in Nielsen&#8217;s national TV ratings as of September 1, 2008. 
Nationally, in comparison to the total number of TV households, the number of Hispanic ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/population_growth_graphic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-791" title="population_growth_graphic" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/population_growth_graphic-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a>The total number of U.S. television households for the 2008-2009 TV season has grown to 114.5 million &#8212; up 1.5% from last year, Nielsen reported Thursday.</p>
<p>U.S. television viewers also increased by 1.3%, to a total of nearly 290 million people (age two and older), with older viewers (age 55+) showing the fastest growth rate (+2.7%).</p>
<p>The new figures, Nielsen&#8217;s TV Universe Estimate for the 2008-2009 TV season, will be reflected in Nielsen&#8217;s national TV ratings as of September 1, 2008. </p>
<p>Nationally, in comparison to the total number of TV households, the number of Hispanic and Asian television households increased by 4.4% and 4.3%, respectively. African American TV households grew by 2.2% during the same time period.</p>
<p>Locally, the top 20 <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/pdf/2008_09_DMA_Ranks.pdf" target="_blank">television markets</a> held onto their 2007-2008 TV season ranks. Movement among lower-ranked markets reflected recent population growth in the Southern and Western United States &#8212; of the 58 markets that moved up in rank, more than half are in the Southeast or Mountain regions.</p>
<p>Local market estimates are projected to January 1, 2009 and will be used in metered market samples as of September 27, 2008.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/press_release34.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/media-agencies-research/e3i1ceb4468ca0772e7143529f7fa375d45" target="_blank">Mediaweek</a> and <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&amp;s=89570&amp;Nid=46646&amp;p=958959" target="_blank">Media Daily News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-viewers-households-up-sligtly-in-2008-09-tv-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

