<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; magazines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/magazines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Can Neuromarketing Research Increase Sales?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/can-neuromarketing-research-increase-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/can-neuromarketing-research-increase-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NeuroFocus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase intent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eliminating guesswork is a marketer’s dream, which is now a definable reality with quantifiable results. The notion was put to the test to see if neuroscience could be used to help a magazine sell more copies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/engage.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23917" title="engage" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/engage.jpg" alt="engage" width="563" height="151" /></a></p>
<p><strong><em>Dr. A. K. Pradeep, Chief Executive Officer of NeuroFocus</em></strong></p>
<p>Every new product launch, ad campaign or package design takes significant research, time and resources to ensure success, but not every launch is successful. Suffice it to say that guess work plays a part to determine: Will it grab attention? Will it be memorable? Will it engage emotionally? And most importantly, will it drive purchase intent?</p>
<p>Taking the guess work out of the equation prior to launch is a marketer’s dream, which is now a definable reality with quantifiable results. Just recently the notion was put to the test to see if neuroscience could be used to help a magazine sell more copies. And the results were enlightening.</p>
<p><strong>Clever Covers</strong><br />
In a publishing industry’s first, New Scientist Magazine approached NeuroFocus to test three different cover designs for an August issue of the magazine using neuromarketing. Applying high density arrays of electroencephalographic (EEG) sensors to capture test subjects’ subconscious responses to the three covers, NeuroFocus identified one as clearly superior in terms of its overall neurological effectiveness.</p>
<p>By monitoring brainwave activity across the full brain as subjects viewed the covers, and using eye-tracking technology to identify which specific parts of the cover they were looking at, NeuroFocus was able to measure their immediate, subconscious reaction to the designs.</p>
<p>While all three tested cover designs performed well in the research, the specific design that ranked highest in terms of overall neurological effectiveness scored exceptionally well in emotional engagement—one of NeuroFocus’ primary NeuroMetrics, the others being attention and memory retention (cover design 1 below was the winner). From those primary NeuroMetrics, NeuroFocus derives measures of purchase intent, novelty, and awareness.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/covers_lg.jpg"></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/covers_lg.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23930" title="covers_sm" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/covers_sm.jpg" alt="covers_sm" width="570" height="238" /></a>(click images to enlarge)</p>
<p><strong>Rewarding Results</strong><br />
The August issue of the magazine achieved strong U.K. newsstand sales, making it the second highest selling issue of the year. This represented a 12% increase over the same issue in the previous year—a much higher rate of return than expected for the normally quiet month of August.</p>
<p>The results have very significant implications for companies across many categories, but especially those for whom the effectiveness of packaging design is a vital marketplace component. A magazine cover serves the same purpose as a package design does for consumer goods. It stimulates emotional engagement and drives memory retention, which is essential to the formulation of purchase intent.</p>
<p><strong>21st Century Marketing Science</strong><br />
Neuromarketing is increasingly being used across numerous industries worldwide to help companies improve their product development, package design and marketing efforts, but this is the first time it has been used by a magazine publisher.</p>
<p>Having sales success in a competitive environment such as a crowded newsstand carries real meaning for manufacturers, marketers, and retailers. Full-brain neurological testing provides a deep dive into consumers&#8217; subconscious minds, where product trial and purchase decisions are made, and where brand loyalty is formed. This study shows that neuromarketing capabilities can deliver at the cash register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/can-neuromarketing-research-increase-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Ad Spending Drops 7 Percent In Q1 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-drops-7-percent-in-q1-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-drops-7-percent-in-q1-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global AdView Pulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising spending around the world dropped 7.2 percent in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, according to Nielsen&#8217;s Global AdView Pulse.  European countries were hit the hardest, with ad spending down in Spain 28.2 percent, Ireland down 21.2 percent and Italy down 19.1 percent.  The U.S. recorded a decline of 12.7 percent.  Ad spending in Asia Pacific was down just 2.3 percent in the first quarter.  Indonesia actually recorded growth of 19.1 percent due largely to the elections there, while China&#8217;s growth slowed to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising spending around the world dropped 7.2 percent in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, according to Nielsen&#8217;s Global AdView Pulse.  European countries were hit the hardest, with ad spending down in Spain 28.2 percent, Ireland down 21.2 percent and Italy down 19.1 percent.  The U.S. recorded a decline of 12.7 percent.  Ad spending in Asia Pacific was down just 2.3 percent in the first quarter.  Indonesia actually recorded growth of 19.1 percent due largely to the elections there, while China&#8217;s growth slowed to 2.5 percent.</p>
<p>&#8220;The effects of the global financial crisis have certainly caught up with the ad sector in this latest quarter, especially in North America and Europe where virtually all of the territories we reported on recorded negative growth,&#8221; said Ben van der Werf, managing director, Global AdView at Nielsen.  &#8220;Even China, which usually sees a boost in ad spend during the Chinese New Year, posted subdued growth for the quarter.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/q1_global_spend.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13418" title="q1_global_spend" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/q1_global_spend.png" alt="" width="525" height="420" /></a><br />
All four major media types &#8211; newspapers, magazines, TV and radio &#8211; posted drops in ad spending, with print media leading the decline.  Magazines fared the worst (-17.4%) followed by newspapers (-9.1%).   In North America, magazine ad spend was down 22.2 percent, while newspapers were off 15.6 percent.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, the automotive category recorded the largest loss in ad spend &#8211; down 19.9 percent &#8211; followed by financial services (-16.7%) and clothing (-15.7%).</p>
<p>Read the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/adview-pulse-q109-mr-jun09_8jul09-a.pdf">Global Ad Spend press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-drops-7-percent-in-q1-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Liquor, Wine, and Vitamins Sales Skew To U.S. Households Without Children</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-liquor-wine-and-vitamins-sales-skew-to-us-households-without-children/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-liquor-wine-and-vitamins-sales-skew-to-us-households-without-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitamins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=4406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. households without children spent 19% more on liquor and wine, and 14% more on vitamins than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.
Although households are often assumed to be conventional families with children, most U.S. households do not have children under the age of 18.  In fact, households without children account for roughly 65% of all U.S. households. 
According to Nielsen, these households represent 77.5% of liquor and wine dollar sales, 74% of vitamin dollar sales, and 73.6% of floral/gardening product and tobacco dollar sales.
Other categories skewing to households without children include medications/remedies, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/family_older-kids_wine.jpg"></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/young_couple_multiracial.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4426" title="young_couple_multiracial" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/young_couple_multiracial-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>U.S. households without children spent 19% more on liquor and wine, and 14% more on vitamins than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>Although households are often assumed to be conventional families with children, most U.S. households do not have children under the age of 18.  In fact, households without children account for roughly 65% of all U.S. households. </p>
<p>According to Nielsen, these households represent 77.5% of liquor and wine dollar sales, 74% of vitamin dollar sales, and 73.6% of floral/gardening product and tobacco dollar sales.</p>
<p>Other categories skewing to households without children include medications/remedies, pet food, books and magazines, and beer.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Categories:<br />
U.S. Households Without Children</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Wine</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Liquor</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Vitamins</td>
<td>114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Floral, Gardening</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Tobacco &amp; Accessories</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Medications/Remedies</td>
<td>111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Nuts</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Pet Food</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Books &amp; Magazines</td>
<td>107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Beer</td>
<td>107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: “Dollar Volume Index” is a demographic segment’s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment’s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-4406"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting households without children may want to promote these categories (above) with feature ads, displays, and product assortments. Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen’s Homescan consumer panel, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population. Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-liquor-wine-and-vitamins-sales-skew-to-us-households-without-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

