<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; liquor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/liquor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>For Consumers, A Big Night In Replaces A Big Night Out</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/for-consumers-a-big-night-in-replaces-a-big-night-out/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/for-consumers-a-big-night-in-replaces-a-big-night-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcoholic beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at-home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Brager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=17173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recession that has gripped much of the world over the last year has caused consumers to seek out entertainment that provides the best value for money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recession that has gripped much of the world over the last year has caused consumers to seek out entertainment that provides the best value for money, and one way they have done so stayed in and enjoyed their alcoholic beverages at home.  This new dynamic was a key theme of the inaugural Nielsen Global Liquor Symposium and Global Wine Forum recently held in Sydney.  The 200 attendees heard from a variety of speakers about consumer trends in different regions, new products and marketing to today’s consumers.</p>
<p>“It was resoundingly clear from the presentations that we have a new consumer on our hands, one that has emerged from the financial crisis with what could be a permanent shift in their values, spending habits and lifestyle choices and affecting the way they consumer and purchase alcohol.  They are more frugal and demanding value.  Investing in new product development should be an essential part of any suppliers&#8217; strategy in counteracting consumers&#8217; heavy reliance on price discounts as a key purchase driver,” said Michael Walton, Executive Director, Nielsen Liquor Group in the Pacific.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s regional experts also provided a snapshot of trends in their respective markets.  The four key topics that were common across regions were:</p>
<ul>
<li>Low carb and low sugar: new products and brand extensions in this category are performing relatively well.</li>
<li>Marketing to the over 50s demographic: This group makes up between 40-50 percent of alcohol consumers in the UK, US, Australia and New Zealand, yet are often overlooked when it comes to marketing in favor of a millennial focus.</li>
<li>Online consumers: New ways and approaches to marketing to the technologically savvy consumer.</li>
<li>New product development: A critical pathway to improve returns and drive real category growth.</li>
</ul>
<p>Gavin Humphreys noted that just 57 percent of British beer drinkers popped over to the pub in 2009, compared to 70.5 percent in 1998.  In fact, the off-trade sector looks set to overtake share of beer consumption over the next two years.  While beer remains the favorite, wine is rapidly gaining share, driven by its link with in-home entertaining and also the availability of cheaper South African, Italian and Chilean varietals.</p>
<p>In the U.S.,  Danny Brager noted that more than 50 percent of Americans choose to entertain and eat at home more often.  Consumers are often trading down in an effort to find the best value, favoring domestic offerings and sticking with brands they know and trust.</p>
<p>Paul Kirby said that almost half of Australian drinkers claimed to be going out less often compared to last year, but are actually trading up when they do go out, sparking growth in premium and super premium alcohol segments (imported beer, international wine and bottled wine priced over $20).  Almost half of all packaged liquor was sold on promotion and 77 percent of alcohol consumers selecting their choice of outlet because it offered great promotions.</p>
<p>Just to the southeast, 60 percent of New Zealanders claimed to be going out less often compared to last year, according to David Hanson.  Annual sales for the off-premise market grew by 10 percent in value terms and 7 percent in volume.  More than three-quarters (77%) of all beer sales were sold on promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/for-consumers-a-big-night-in-replaces-a-big-night-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Liquor, Wine, and Vitamins Sales Skew To U.S. Households Without Children</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-liquor-wine-and-vitamins-sales-skew-to-us-households-without-children/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-liquor-wine-and-vitamins-sales-skew-to-us-households-without-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitamins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=4406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. households without children spent 19% more on liquor and wine, and 14% more on vitamins than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.
Although households are often assumed to be conventional families with children, most U.S. households do not have children under the age of 18.  In fact, households without children account for roughly 65% of all U.S. households. 
According to Nielsen, these households represent 77.5% of liquor and wine dollar sales, 74% of vitamin dollar sales, and 73.6% of floral/gardening product and tobacco dollar sales.
Other categories skewing to households without children include medications/remedies, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/family_older-kids_wine.jpg"></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/young_couple_multiracial.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4426" title="young_couple_multiracial" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/young_couple_multiracial-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>U.S. households without children spent 19% more on liquor and wine, and 14% more on vitamins than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>Although households are often assumed to be conventional families with children, most U.S. households do not have children under the age of 18.  In fact, households without children account for roughly 65% of all U.S. households. </p>
<p>According to Nielsen, these households represent 77.5% of liquor and wine dollar sales, 74% of vitamin dollar sales, and 73.6% of floral/gardening product and tobacco dollar sales.</p>
<p>Other categories skewing to households without children include medications/remedies, pet food, books and magazines, and beer.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Categories:<br />
U.S. Households Without Children</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Wine</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Liquor</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Vitamins</td>
<td>114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Floral, Gardening</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Tobacco &amp; Accessories</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Medications/Remedies</td>
<td>111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Nuts</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Pet Food</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Books &amp; Magazines</td>
<td>107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Beer</td>
<td>107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: “Dollar Volume Index” is a demographic segment’s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment’s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-4406"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting households without children may want to promote these categories (above) with feature ads, displays, and product assortments. Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen’s Homescan consumer panel, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population. Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-liquor-wine-and-vitamins-sales-skew-to-us-households-without-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Wine, Diet Aids, Gardening Product Categories Skew To High-Income U.S. Households</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dairy dips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet aids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh produce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[households earning $100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refrigerated drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skin care preparations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. households earning $100,000 or more in annual income, spent more than twice as much on wine than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.
Although they represent only 18.7% of U.S. households, high-income households represented 39.6% of wine dollar sales during the time period. 
Other categories skewing to households with high incomes include diet aids, liquor, and floral/gardening supplies.



Rank
(by highest index)
Top 10 Category Purchases:
U.S. Households
With $100,000+ Annual Income
Dollar Volume Index*


1
Wine
212


2
Diet Aids
158


3
Liquor
156


4
Floral / Gardening
155


5
Baby Needs
152


6
Snacks / Spreads / Dairy Dips
148


7
Baby Food
147


8
Skin Care Preparations
147


9
Fresh Produce
144


10
Juices / Refrigerated Drinks
142


*Note: &#8220;Dollar Volume ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/diversity.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2874" title="diversity" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/diversity-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>U.S. households earning $100,000 or more in annual income, spent more than twice as much on wine than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.</p>
<p>Although they represent only 18.7% of U.S. households, high-income households represented 39.6% of wine dollar sales during the time period. </p>
<p>Other categories skewing to households with high incomes include diet aids, liquor, and floral/gardening supplies.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Category Purchases:<br />
U.S. Households<br />
With $100,000+ Annual Income</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index*</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Wine</td>
<td>212</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Diet Aids</td>
<td>158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Liquor</td>
<td>156</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Floral / Gardening</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Baby Needs</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Snacks / Spreads / Dairy Dips</td>
<td>148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Baby Food</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Skin Care Preparations</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Fresh Produce</td>
<td>144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Juices / Refrigerated Drinks</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Volume Index&#8221; is a demographic segment&#8217;s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment&#8217;s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-2867"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting high-income households may want to promote these categories with feature ads, displays, and product assortments.  Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://www2.acnielsen.com/products/cps_homescan.shtml" target="_blank">Homescan consumer panel</a>, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population.  Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

