<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Latin America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/latin-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Global Consumer Confidence: Economy Returns as Top Concern</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-confidence-economy-returns-as-top-concern/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-confidence-economy-returns-as-top-concern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Third quarter was volatile and challenging for global economies and financial markets amid stagnant U.S. unemployment figures and a worsening euro zone debt crisis,” said Dr. Venkatesh Bala, Chief Economist at The Cambridge Group, a part of Nielsen. “A recessionary mindset is growing among consumers."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global online consumer confidence fell for the seventh consecutive quarter as confidence in 31 of 56 global markets measured declined, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-consumer-confidence-survey-q3-2011.html">third quarter global online consumer confidence findings</a> from Nielsen.</p>
<p>“Third quarter was volatile and challenging for global economies and financial markets amid stagnant U.S. unemployment figures and a worsening euro zone debt crisis,” said Dr. Venkatesh Bala, Chief Economist at The Cambridge Group, a part of Nielsen. “A recessionary mindset is growing among consumers as more than half say they are currently in a recession—up four percentage points from last quarter and seven points from the start of the year. The result is continued spending restraint for discretionary expenses, which is expected to continue into the next year.”</p>
<p>The survey tracks consumer confidence, major concerns and spending intentions among consumers in 56 countries. Consumer confidence levels above and below a baseline of 100 indicate degrees of optimism and pessimism. U.S. consumer confidence dropped one point to an index of 77. Consumer confidence also fell by one point last quarter in China from 105 to 104 and one point in Germany, Europe’s largest economy.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/recession-mindset.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29747" title="recession-mindset" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/recession-mindset.png" alt="recession-mindset" width="575" height="311" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Economic and job security concerns mount</strong><br />
In the latest round of the survey, conducted between August 30 and September 16, 2011, the economy re-emerged as the top concern among 18 percent of online consumers around the globe. The economy last topped concerns in Q4 2010, before it was replaced by worries over increasing food prices in the first half of this year. Job security follows close behind for 14 percent of consumers, rising five percentage points from three months ago. Managing a work/life balance, increasing food prices and concerns about health round out the top five most stressful issues for respondents.</p>
<p>“Driven by a stalled job market and uncertainty about the future course of the global economy, concerns over job security and other economic risks rise to new heights in the third quarter in many parts of the world,” said Dr. Bala. In North America, one-in-three are concerned about the economy—up seven points from second quarter and more than one-in-10 (12%) are worried about job security—an increase of five points from three months ago.</p>
<p>In Latin America, concerns over job security (15%) and crime (12%) took a slight edge over the economy (11%). In Middle East/Africa, while job security retained the top spot in this region, the quarter-on-quarter increase is noteworthy—jumping nine points to 20 percent up from 11 percent in second quarter. In Asia Pacific, the economy (18%) and job security (15%) rose eight and seven points, respectively.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/top-concerns.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29749" title="top-concerns" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/top-concerns.png" alt="top-concerns" width="575" height="450" /></a></p>
<p>For more detail and insight, download Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-consumer-confidence-survey-q3-2011.html">Q3 2011 Consumer Confidence report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-confidence-economy-returns-as-top-concern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Retailing – Flexible Formats</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-future-of-retailing-%e2%80%93-flexible-formats/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-future-of-retailing-%e2%80%93-flexible-formats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypermarkets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail and shopper strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumers today are increasingly mobile and as technology advancements continue around the world, retailing will evolve to keep pace. And while online shopping has shown impressive growth momentum over the past few years in industries such as travel, publishing, electronics and even clothing, the pace of change has been much slower for consumer-packaged goods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers today are increasingly mobile and as technology advancements continue around the world, retailing will evolve to keep pace. And while online shopping has shown impressive growth momentum over the past few years in industries such as travel, publishing, electronics and even clothing, the pace of change has been much slower for consumer-packaged goods.</p>
<p>When considering new and flexible retail formats for grocery shopping, specific preferences emerge when it comes to particular online delivery options, according to Nielsen’s 2011 <a title="Shopping and Saving Strategies Around the World" href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Global Online Survey</a> of more than 25,000 Internet respondents across 51 countries. While more than half (52%) of global online consumers say they are likely to place a grocery order online if it is delivered to their homes, less than one-third feel the same if they are required to pick up the online order curbside (27%) or via a drive-thru window (30%). Interestingly, more consumers—just over one-third (36%)—say they are willing to pick up an online order inside the store.</p>
<p>The online shopping/home delivery option is most embraced by consumers in Asia Pacific, where more than three-quarters (77%) say they are likely to take advantage of this option, which contrasts sharply with one-fifth of North Americans (20%) and one-third (35%) of Europeans. “The main resistance in developed countries in Europe and North America is primarily due to the high volume of grocery stores that are available,” said Jean-Jacques Vandenheede, Director Retailer Industry Insights, Nielsen. “In Asia Pacific, fewer physical stores and a very digital consumer base equal a fertile distribution channel for online.”  About half of respondents in Middle East/Africa (48%) and Latin America (51%) indicated they are likely to shop for groceries online for home delivery.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-6.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29450" title="value-over-price-6" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-6.png" alt="value-over-price-6" width="570" height="501" /></a></p>
<p>Using hand-held scanners to record purchases while shopping to avoid waiting on checkout lines was welcomed by half of global online consumers. While interest is again highest among Asia Pacific consumers (60% interested and only 14% unlikely to try it), in each region, more consumers indicated they are likely to try it than not.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-7.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29440" title="value-over-price-7" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-7.png" alt="value-over-price-7" width="590" height="532" /></a></p>
<p>For more detail and regional insights, download: <a title="Shopping and Saving Strategies Around the World" href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Shopping &amp; Saving Strategies Around the World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-future-of-retailing-%e2%80%93-flexible-formats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Up or Quick Trip: How Consumers Around the World Shop</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/stock-up-or-quick-trip-how-consumers-around-the-world-shop/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/stock-up-or-quick-trip-how-consumers-around-the-world-shop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypermarkets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While many consumers, particularly in North America, report stocking up as the primary reason for making a trip to the grocery store, that reason is not uniformly widespread across the globe, according to Nielsen’s 2011 Global Online Survey.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many consumers, particularly in North America, report stocking up as the primary reason for making a trip to the grocery store, that reason is not uniformly widespread across the globe, according to Nielsen’s 2011 <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html">Global Online Survey</a> of more than 25,000 Internet respondents across 51 countries. In fact, in several regions and markets, consumers indicate that most of their grocery store visits are initiated to either buy a few essential items or to quickly pick-up an item that needed replenishment. Factors such as the structure of trade, household size and refrigeration availability contributes to the differences in shopping frequency reported around the world.</p>
<p>By far, North Americans are the mostly likely to make a shopping trip to stock up on groceries, with 60 percent of North American consumers indicating their primary reason to make a trip is to stock up on staples. By contrast, 18 percent say they make a trip to pick up a few items, and just seven percent say they shop when they run out of something at home. “The impact of high gas prices in the U.S. has prompted consumers to combine errands and trips,” said Hale. “This trip consolidation has resulted in a reduction in small grocery trips in the U.S.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-5b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29448" title="value-over-price-5" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-5.png" alt="value-over-price-5" width="570" height="297" /></a></p>
<p>A more even distribution of shopping trip missions is reported in Europe, where 37 percent say they stock up on grocery trips, one-in-five (21%) shop when needing a few essential items, and 25 percent make a quick shopping trip when they run out of something at home. “Retail trip missions in Europe are dictated by store infrastructure,” said Jean-Jacques Vandenheede, Director Retailer Industry Insights, Nielsen. “In countries where shoppers have a high density of stores to choose from, such as in Italy or Germany, shoppers tend to shop more often. In countries that are dominated by hypermarkets with less retailer availability, stocking-up is the more dominant shopping pattern.”</p>
<p>Conversely, stocking up for groceries is less common in Asia Pacific, Latin America and in the Middle East/Africa where roughly one-in-five consumers say that is the primary reason for the shopping trip. Across both the Asia Pacific and Middle East/Africa regions, about one-third of online consumers say a quick trip for needed items is the primary reason for shopping trips (32% and 33%, respectively). A similar, but slightly smaller, number say trips are made to purchase a few essential items (28% of trips in Middle East/Africa and 29% of trips in Asia Pacific). Similarly, in Latin America, the most commonly reported reason for making a shopping trip among one-third of respondents is to pick up a few essential items and one-quarter say they make a quick trip to replenish.</p>
<p>For more detail and regional insights, download: <a title="Shopping and Saving Strategies Around the World" href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Shopping &amp; Saving Strategies Around the World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/stock-up-or-quick-trip-how-consumers-around-the-world-shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Consumers Go Sale Searching and Coupon Clipping</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumers-go-sale-searching-and-coupon-clipping/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumers-go-sale-searching-and-coupon-clipping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypermarkets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly six in 10 (59%) global consumers look for sales to save on household expenses—the leading saving strategy of eight measured across all regions and most prevalent in North America (73%) and Europe (60%), according to Nielsen’s 2011 Global Online Survey of more than 25,000 Internet respondents across 51 countries. Using coupons was the second most popular saving strategy, used by nearly half (48%) of global online consumers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly six in 10 (59%) global consumers look for sales to save on household expenses—the leading saving strategy of eight measured across all regions and most prevalent in North America (73%) and Europe (60%), according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s 2011 Global Online Survey</a> of more than 25,000 Internet respondents across 51 countries. Using coupons was the second most popular saving strategy, used by nearly half (48%) of global online consumers.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-3b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29445" title="value-over-price-3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-3.png" alt="value-over-price-3" width="570" height="327" /></a></p>
<p>Reported use of coupons is greatest in North America (65%) and Asia Pacific (55%). The United States (66%), China (67%) and Hong Kong (65%) are the three leading markets for reported coupon use as a way to save money.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-4.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29447" title="value-over-price-4" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-4.png" alt="value-over-price-4" width="570" height="155" /></a></p>
<p>“About 80 percent of U.S. households use manufacturer coupons across all retail outlets, which is up slightly from 2009 to 2010,” said Todd Hale, SVP Consumer &amp; Shopper Insights, Nielsen. “But coupon usage is concentrated—70 percent of 2010 manufacturer coupon purchases came from just 13 percent of coupon-using households. These coupon enthusiasts are big spenders across the total store and are young, more affluent and have large households.”</p>
<p>“In China, 35 percent of hypermarket sales in key cities are sold on promotion—a stable contribution over the past two years,” said Peter Gale, Managing Director Retail Sales, Nielsen Asia Pacific and Greater China. “In most Asian countries, simple price cut promotions are the main promotional vehicle supported by direct mail leaflets and newspaper advertising.”</p>
<p>While 38 percent of European consumers indicate using coupons to save, there is wide variation within the continent. While at least half of consumers reported coupon use in several western and southern European countries, such as Belgium and Portugal (63%), Greece (55%), France (53%), and Spain (50%), in other markets, particularly in northern and Eastern Europe, coupon use is much less prevalent. “Belgians are the record holders in terms of coupon redemption, but in countries like Germany or the Netherlands, their usage is very marginal,” said Jean-Jacques Vandenheede, Director, Retail Industry Insights, Nielsen Europe. “Many retailers in Europe are rather reluctant towards that practice.”</p>
<p>In Latin America and in Middle East/Africa, reported coupon use is much less common as a saving strategy. Only 25 percent of consumers in Latin America and 18 percent of respondents from Middle Eastern/African markets report using coupons. “In the Middle East, price cuts is the most popular promotional vehicle used by retailers along with volume discounts,” said Bassel Adel, Director Retail Services, Nielsen Middle East, North Africa, Pakistan. “However, consumers are gaining a greater awareness of leaflets, which are driving store visits and prompting retailers to actively advertise promotions in newspapers.”</p>
<p>For more detail and regional insights, download: <a title="Shopping and Saving Strategies Around the World" href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Shopping &amp; Saving Strategies Around the World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumers-go-sale-searching-and-coupon-clipping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumers Around the World Favor Value Over Price</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-around-the-world-favor-value-over-price/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-around-the-world-favor-value-over-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online grocery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail and shopper strategies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumers around the world continue their broad efforts to save money at the checkout counter, but while low prices are important to shoppers, getting a good value for their money takes priority.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers around the world continue their broad efforts to save money at the checkout counter, but while low prices are important to shoppers, getting a good value for their money takes priority. Fully 61 percent of global online consumers rated “good value” over “low price” (58%) as the most influential reason to shop at a particular retailer, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s 2011 Global Online Survey</a> of more than 25,000 Internet respondents across 51 countries. <strong> </strong></p>
<p>The study shows that while factors relating to value and price are important drivers of where to shop and what to buy, retailers and manufacturers who offer good values—whether through sales and promotions or via larger-sized economy packaging—stand to gain the most from consumers who continue efforts to stretch their money in a tough economy.</p>
<p>The preference for value over lowest prices in retailer choice was found to be true in Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North  America, while slightly more Middle East/Africa respondents preferred lowest overall prices (59%) to good values (54%). Other attributes rated as “highly influential” by more than half of global online consumers were convenient location, great sales/promotions, well-stocked shelves and high-quality fresh produce.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-1b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29441" title="value-over-price-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-1.png" alt="value-over-price-1" width="570" height="386" /></a><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Bigger is Better &amp; Quality is Key</strong><br />
Commodity and raw material costs continue to rise, squeezing profit opportunities for producers and brands. For CPG manufacturers and retailers seeking direction on consumer demand, the study found a clear preference for strategies that increase value—even in the form of more expensive overall package prices.</p>
<p>When given the choice of either purchasing large value packs at a lower price per serving or smaller pack sizes at a lower cost, global online consumers voted 2:1 for the former. Thirty-six percent of global online respondents indicated they would prefer manufacturers to offer larger economy size packages, with lower prices per usage/serving. Half as many respondents (18%) said they would prefer new, smaller-sized packages at lower prices, and only about one-in-ten (12%) would prefer modestly downsized packages at the existing price level.</p>
<p>Roughly one-third of consumers in every region say they would prefer the larger, economy-sized packages, but the sentiment is most pronounced in North America, where 39 percent of consumers indicated a preference for value packs, 20 percent for smaller packages at lower prices, and 11 percent for modestly downsized packages at current prices. “However, in tough economic times and with wide fluctuations in commodity pricing, downsizing has been a successful strategy taken by manufacturers and retailers,” said Todd Hale, SVP Consumer &amp; Shopper Insights, Nielsen. “To remain profitable, retailers and manufacturers have a few choices: raise prices to cover input increases, modify ingredients to make products cost less to produce or downsize.”</p>
<p>Consumers around the world make it clear that quality is not to be compromised. Producing slightly lower quality products, but keeping prices the same is the least favored option among consumers in all regions. Raising prices is also a strategy that consumers do not embrace.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-2b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29443" title="value-over-price-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/value-over-price-2.png" alt="value-over-price-2" width="570" height="327" /></a></p>
<p>For more detail and regional insights, download: <a title="Shopping and Saving Strategies Around the World" href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/global-shopping-survey-oct-2011.html" target="_blank">Shopping &amp; Saving Strategies Around the World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-around-the-world-favor-value-over-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey Says: Ad Agencies in Brazil, Argentina and Mexico Plan to Expand Mobile Marketing</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/survey-says-ad-agencies-in-brazil-argentina-and-mexico-plan-to-expand-mobile-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/survey-says-ad-agencies-in-brazil-argentina-and-mexico-plan-to-expand-mobile-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent survey of the top 300 advertising agencies in Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico, which was undertaken by Nielsen on behalf of the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) in Latin America, underlined the tremendous growth potential of mobile media in the region.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent survey of the top 300 advertising agencies in Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico, which was undertaken by Nielsen on behalf of the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) in Latin America, underlined the tremendous growth potential of mobile media in the region.</p>
<p>According to Thiago Moreira, director of Telecom for Nielsen in Brazil, the purpose of the research was to determine how much advertising agencies in these three important Latin American markets knew about mobile marketing and what kinds of campaigns they typically undertook.  “What we learned is that while mobile marketing is just emerging as a marketing discipline in all three countries, it is taking on very different characteristics in each of these markets, with Brazilian agencies being the most active in mobile marketing.”</p>
<p><strong>Brazil</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>83 percent of agencies in Brazil believe that mobile      marketing is a channel that can be better exploited.</li>
<li>62 percent of the agencies surveyed in Brazil      launched mobile marketing campaigns in 2010, a figure that is expected to      increase to 87 percent in 2011.</li>
<li>Most mobile marketing initiatives in Brazil use      multimedia with games and music and video downloads,<strong><em> </em></strong>and for      2011, 50 percent of campaigns will reach iPhones users alone.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Argentina</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>65 percent of agencies in Argentina believe that mobile      marketing is a channel that can be better exploited.</li>
<li>43 percent of Argentinean agencies will develop mobile      marketing campaigns in 2011 aimed at iPhone users</li>
<li>The most used content within mobile campaigns: Product      information and alerts, sales and offers (30%), games (26%) and music and      video downloads (21%).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Mexico</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>59 percent of agencies in Mexico believe that mobile      marketing is a channel that can be better exploited.</li>
<li>41 percent of agencies in Mexico are expected to direct      their mobile campaigns to iPhone users</li>
<li>The most-used content within mobile campaigns: Product      information, alerts, sales and offers (32%), music and video downloads      (27%) and games (20%).</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/survey-says-ad-agencies-in-brazil-argentina-and-mexico-plan-to-expand-mobile-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chile, Colombia Lead Latin American Internet, Cable Penetration</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/chile-colombia-lead-latin-american-internet-cable-penetration/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/chile-colombia-lead-latin-american-internet-cable-penetration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latin America endured the global recession much better than North America or Europe, and today it stands out as one of the stronger regions for economic growth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latin America endured the global recession much better than North America or Europe, and today it stands out as one of the stronger regions for economic growth.  The Nielsen Company recently conducted a study of four countries – Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico – to see how the increased affluence of consumers there has affected media penetration rates.</p>
<p>Chile led the group when it came to ownership of home computers and Internet penetration.  Computer ownership was up five points from the previous year to 57% and Internet penetration hit 41%, an increase of six points.  The biggest jumps, however, came from Brazil, where more than half (51%) of households now own computers, up from just 26% the year before, and Internet penetration rose 13 points to 31%.</p>
<p>“Brazil’s economic growth is driving consumption across most sectors as consumers have more money to spend, so this rise is not so surprising,” said Roberto Vazquez Ferrero, Managing Director of the telecom practice at Nielsen Latin America.</p>
<p>Internet penetration in Colombia was up five points to 29% while in Mexico, it rose three points to 24%.</p>
<p>Televisions are now ubiquitous in the four countries, with 98% of homes owning them.  Colombia is far-and-away the leader when it comes to cable TV – 81% of households have subscriptions.  Half (51%) of Chilean households subscribe to cable.  Meanwhile, just one-quarter of Brazilian homes and one-third of Mexican homes have cable.</p>
<p>“The main barrier to cable penetration is the cost of service.  I would expect cable penetration to rise in Brazil in the near term.  In Mexico, there are many cable operators with differing services.  As they package them in ways that combine TV and Internet, such as the double and triple play packages, we could see greater penetration as competition leads to lower prices,” said Vazquez.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Chile</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>2007</th>
<th>2008</th>
<th>2009</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Conventional TV</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>99%</td>
<td>98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Subscription TV</td>
<td>41%</td>
<td>44%</td>
<td>51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Internet</td>
<td>31%</td>
<td>35%</td>
<td>41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Computer</td>
<td>49%</td>
<td>52%</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Brazil</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>2007</th>
<th>2008</th>
<th>2009</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Conventional TV</td>
<td>97%</td>
<td>95%</td>
<td>97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Subscription TV</td>
<td>9%</td>
<td>16%</td>
<td>26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Internet</td>
<td>17%</td>
<td>18%</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Computer</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>26%</td>
<td>51%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Colombia</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>2007</th>
<th>2008</th>
<th>2009</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Conventional TV</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>99%</td>
<td>98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Subscription TV</td>
<td>78%</td>
<td>81%</td>
<td>81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Internet</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>24%</td>
<td>29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Computer</td>
<td>4%</td>
<td>9%</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Mexico</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>2007</th>
<th>2008</th>
<th>2009</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Conventional TV</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Subscription TV</td>
<td>32%</td>
<td>35%</td>
<td>33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Internet</td>
<td>17%</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Computer</td>
<td>30%</td>
<td>33%</td>
<td>32%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="color:009dd9; font-size:.9em;">Source: The Nielsen Company</p>
<p style="font-size:.9em;">Notes: Internet penetration refers to households that are serviced. It excludes users who use it outside the home (e.g. internet cafes, offices, etc.). In Colombia, computer penetration includes only laptops, not desktops</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/chile-colombia-lead-latin-american-internet-cable-penetration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Ad Spending Shows Signs of Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-shows-signs-of-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-shows-signs-of-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. market, which faced six straight quarters of declines in ad spending, has seen a turnaround in 2010, with a 3.8 percent increase year-over-year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As global ad spending continues a steady climb to recovery in the first half of 2010, advertising in the world’s largest market is also seeing signs of growth, with a 3.8 percent increase in U.S. ad spending year-over-year, according to <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/content/nielsen/en_us/news/news_releases/2010/october/global_ad_spend_continuessteadyclimbtorecoverywith128percentrebo.html" target="_blank">figures released today</a> by The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>The U.S. market, which faced six straight quarters of declines in ad spending, has seen a turnaround in 2010. In total, advertisers spent an estimated $54 billion during the first half of 2010. The increase in U.S. advertising reflects a modest improvement in U.S. consumer confidence in the first half of the year, as advertisers look to highlight value deals and increase promotions in the hopes of spurring consumer spending.</p>
<p>However, with confidence still well below pre-recessionary levels, automotive was one of only a few bright spots in the top 10 product category ad spending.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">U.S. Ad Spend by Sector</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Category</th>
<th> Quarter 1, 2009 &#8211; Quarter 2, 2009-$$$</th>
<th> Quarter 1, 2010 &#8211; Quarter 2, 2010-$$$</th>
<th> % Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Automotive</td>
<td>3,491,438,000</td>
<td>4,431,709,000</td>
<td>26.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Pharmaceutical</td>
<td>2,090,707,000</td>
<td>1,998,762,000</td>
<td>-4.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Motion Picture</td>
<td>1,645,751,000</td>
<td>1,592,196,000</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Telephone Services &#8211; Wireless</td>
<td>1,758,535,000</td>
<td>1,518,600,000</td>
<td>-13.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Restaurant</td>
<td>805,082,000</td>
<td>824,978,000</td>
<td>2.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Restaurant &#8211; Quick Service</td>
<td>2,114,925,000</td>
<td>2,024,575,000</td>
<td>-4.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Dealerships</td>
<td>1,634,702,000</td>
<td>1,602,897,000</td>
<td>-1.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Department Store</td>
<td>1,516,520,000</td>
<td>1,591,149,000</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Products &#8211; Direct</td>
<td>933,141,000</td>
<td>828,155,000</td>
<td>-11.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Auto Insurance</td>
<td>623,212,000</td>
<td>764211,000</td>
<td>22.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>16,614,018,000</strong></td>
<td><strong>17,177,235,000</strong></td>
<td><strong>3.39%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Excludes Internet spending. Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Overall, there was a 3 percent increase in the top 10 product categories, with the largest growth by far seen in automotive (+27%) and auto insurance (+23%). The automotive advertising was driven largely by increased spending by General Motors which was up 73% over 1H09. Ford and Toyota also grew their ad spending by 15% and 22% respectively. An increase of 82% for UAW Health Care Trust contributed to the first half growth in the auto insurance category. All other categories, except department stores (+5%) and restaurants (+2%) showed declines in the first six months of the year.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/global-ad-spend-change.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24406" title="Regional Increases in Advertising Dollars Spent" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/global-ad-spend-change.png" alt="Regional Increases in Advertising Dollars Spent" width="475" height="350" /></a></p>
<p>“Not surprisingly, auto ad spending is closely tied to auto sales given that those sales dollars enable increased marketing expenditures,” said Sallie Hirsch, SVP of Research for Nielsen’s automotive unit. “Last year was abysmal for the auto industry as economic factors drove down sales to very low levels. Now that we’re seeing an improvement in the market and consumers are more willing to open their wallets, car sales have started to rebound and that’s what’s driving the increase in ad spending for 2010.”</p>
<p>Looking at ad spending across media types, U.S. television (network, cable, syndication, spot, Spanish Language network and Spanish Language cable) continues to dominate, accounting for $33.8 billion in advertising during the 1H10, a 6 percent increase over last year. Spanish language network TV and Cable TV in particular saw the biggest gains, up 24 percent and 13 percent respectively over 1H09.</p>
<p>Print media overall (national and local magazines, newspapers, Sunday supplements and B2B) was flat, however, national Sunday supplements received a significant uptick with 21.6 percent growth over last year. National newspapers were also up 10.8 percent. Alternatively, B2B and local Sunday supplements declined 19.2 percent and 12.1 percent respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">U.S. Ad Spend by Media Type</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Media Type</th>
<th> Jan-Jun 2009</th>
<th> Jan-Jun 2010</th>
<th> % Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Business to Business</td>
<td>$1,305,504,250</td>
<td>$1,054,525,521</td>
<td>-19.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cable TV</td>
<td>$8,063,091,000</td>
<td>$9,108,321,000</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">FSI Coupon</td>
<td>$246,535,406</td>
<td>$253,643,516</td>
<td>2.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Magazine</td>
<td>$215,200,797</td>
<td>$198,596,922</td>
<td>-7.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Newspaper</td>
<td>$5,175,683,500</td>
<td>$5,187,628,000</td>
<td>0.23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Local Sunday Supplement</td>
<td>$26,757,018</td>
<td>$23,533,229</td>
<td>-12.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Magazine</td>
<td>$7,261,397,500</td>
<td>$7,425,700,500</td>
<td>2.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Newspaper</td>
<td>$603,244,125</td>
<td>$668,556,625</td>
<td>10.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Sunday Supplement</td>
<td>$460,186,281</td>
<td>$559,376,875</td>
<td>21.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network Radio</td>
<td>$491,766,875</td>
<td>$494,776,188</td>
<td>0.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network TV</td>
<td>$10,587,809,000</td>
<td>$11,489,960,000</td>
<td>8.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Outdoor</td>
<td>$1,506,906,750</td>
<td>$1,530,320,000</td>
<td>1.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Cable TV</td>
<td>$205,042,672</td>
<td>$202,412,703</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Network TV</td>
<td>$1,326,478,750</td>
<td>$1,646,938,375</td>
<td>24.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot Radio</td>
<td>$2,572,394,500</td>
<td>$2,514,994,000</td>
<td>-2.23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot TV</td>
<td>$10,637,725,000</td>
<td>$10,292,083,000</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Syndicated TV</td>
<td>$1,096,335,750</td>
<td>$1,107,379,875</td>
<td>1.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>$51,782,059,174</strong></td>
<td><strong>$53,758,746,329</strong></td>
<td><strong>3.82%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Excludes Internet spending. Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spending-shows-signs-of-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Health &amp; Beauty Trends</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-health-beauty-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-health-beauty-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Online Consumer Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health and beauty aids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen probed consumers' attitudes towards health and beauty products—where they purchased them and what factors went into their buying decisions—as part of its Global Online Survey of more than 27,000 people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/beauty2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24072" title="Beauty" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/beauty2.jpg" alt="Beauty" width="563" height="151" /></a><br />
<strong>Beauty on a Budget</strong><br />
With consumers around the world cutting back on discretionary expenses during the recession, Nielsen probed consumers’ attitudes towards health and beauty (H&amp;B) products—where they purchased them and what factors went into their buying decisions—as part of its Global Online Survey of more than 27,000 people across 55 countries in the first quarter of 2010. And while views and habits differ by region, there’s one thing in common: people continue to place importance on looking good and feeling their best.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Universal Appeal</strong><br />
Virtually all online survey respondents in Latin America (96%) and Asia Pacific (92%) said they purchased H&amp;B products, along with 90% of people around the world who made up the global average. But what prompts consumers to stock their cabinets with make-up, fragrances and personal care items?</p>
<p>For 44% of global respondents, it was the lure of the product’s promise. A pragmatic 69% of respondents said they were influenced by price, while 58% said they bought as a result of a personal recommendation. Magazine articles, Internet buzz and traditional ads all factored into the purchase equation as well.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_influence.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24070" title="Price, Preferred Brand and Friends Are Biggest Influencers of Health &amp; Beauty Products" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_influence.jpg" alt="Price, Preferred Brand and Friends Are Biggest Influencers of Health &amp; Beauty Products" width="575" height="412" /></a><br />
Product samples helped about half of consumers along the buying path, as did the suggestion of a partner. But aside from price, the reason most consumers (65%) offered up for buying health and beauty products was the influence of their preferred brand.</p>
<p>Half of Asia Pacific respondents indicated that the Internet was a purchasing influence—the highest percent of any region. These consumers were also swayed by magazine articles (45%) and advertising campaigns (44%) more than other region. Conversely, European and North American beauty product choices were the least influenced by print and television ads, magazine editorial or the Internet and were most influenced by price; 82% of North Americans and 70% of Europeans agreed that price was a key determining factor.</p>
<p>Latin Americans said they were most persuaded by their preferred brand (72%) and free samples (60%). Middle Eastern survey takers reported the most balanced responses, giving fairly equal weight across all influencers. They were, however, least influenced by the product’s promise (36%) and most by their preferred brand (63%).</p>
<p><strong>Channel Choices</strong><br />
Far and away, supermarkets were the format of choice for 60% of global respondents, with the drugstore/chemist/pharmacy a distant second destination at 39%, specialty stores in third place at 33% and the Internet trailing at 22%.</p>
<p>Asia Pacific shoppers scored the highest of any region (33%) to say they shop the Internet for health and beauty products—more than double Europeans (15%), Latin Americans (14%), North Americans (11%) and Middle Easterners (9%). Specialty stores were the destination of choice for 40% of Latin American and Asia Pacific shoppers and 95% of Middle Eastern shoppers say they buy health and beauty products from just two channels—supermarkets (56%) and drugstores (39%).</p>
<p><strong>Mass vs. Premium: Looking Good Enough</strong><br />
A question for the ages: can mass market cosmetics successfully sell against more expensive, premium brands in such an image-intensive category tied to personal vanity and ego? Yes, although the degree of success varies by product type. Global results for hair products showed that 81% of online respondents think mass market hair products are a viable alternative, while 75% find mass market skincare products acceptable, and 72% believed mass market cosmetics were suitable.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_massmarket.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24071" title="Most Consumers Agree: Mass-Market Health &amp; Beauty Products are Just As Good As Expensive Alternatives" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hb_massmarket.jpg" alt="Most Consumers Agree: Mass-Market Health &amp; Beauty Products are Just As Good As Expensive Alternatives" width="575" height="382" /></a><br />
North American respondents were the most positive about mass-market health and beauty products, viewing them as good substitutes, while Middle Eastern and Asia Pacific survey takers were the least enamored with the off-market products.</p>
<p><strong>Region Round-Up</strong><br />
In almost all Latin American countries included in this survey, sales for personal care products reported volume increases during the latest rolling year ending June 2010 versus year ago: Chile +7.2%, Argentina +4.7%, Brazil +3.4%, Mexico +3.4% and Colombia +3.3%. Only Venezuela showed a negative trend, declining 2.5%.</p>
<p>In the U.S., dollar growth for the health and beauty department for the year ending July 2010 is flat (0.3%) and units have declined 2% as the economy is driving consumers to make tradeoffs and buy less. However, sales in the June and July 2010 period are improving as retailers are raising prices to enhance margins. In Canada, rising prices have fueled an increase in health and beauty (excluding baby and OTC) dollar sales of 3.2%, which outpaced the total market (+2.6%) while units were flat.</p>
<p>In Asia, consumers started to switch back into purchasing personal care, healthy and more premium products in the second half of 2009. This trend is expected to continue with the improving consumer confidence in the region.</p>
<p>The never-ending quest for beauty and perfection bodes well for the H&amp;B sector. In countries that have emerged from the recession with vigor, the sector is likely to thrive. Meanwhile, in those regions where the recovery is still shaky—or in doubt altogether—health and beauty product manufacturers and retailers need to know exactly what’s important to those consumers: value for money and high quality products that enable them to look good, despite life’s pressures.</p>
<p><strong>Note about online survey methodology</strong><br />
<em>While online survey methodology allows for tremendous scale and global reach, it provides the perspectives on the habits of existing Internet users, not total populations. Where noted, the Nielsen Global Online Survey data is supplemented with consumption data by market.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-health-beauty-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Consumer Strategies for Saving Money</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-strategies-for-saving-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-strategies-for-saving-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company conducted an online survey in March 2010 of more than 27,000 consumers in 55 markets to get a better sense of the steps being taken to save money in view of uncertain economic conditions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23812" title="Save" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save2.jpg" alt="Save" width="563" height="151" /></a></p>
<p>It was the rare household that didn’t change spending habits over the last 18 months. Faced with unemployment (or even the prospect of it), higher expenses and crushing debts, consumers around the globe used a number of tactics to stretch their money further to get the most bang for the buck.</p>
<p>The Nielsen Company conducted an online survey in March 2010 of more than 27,000 consumers in 55 markets from Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, North America and the Middle East/Africa (consisting of countries from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, Egypt and South Africa) to get a better sense of the steps being taken to save money in view of uncertain economic conditions.</p>
<p>What’s more, while recovery has taken hold in some regions (Asia Pacific and Latin America in particular), in other regions it has been tentative. Regardless, one thing remains clear: habits picked up during the recession are likely to survive even after economic recovery is in full-swing.</p>
<p><strong>Value Strategies Help Savvy Consumers Save</strong><br />
In addition to a shift toward <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-global-staying-power-of-private-label/">private label products</a>, global online survey respondents saved money on household expenses in a number of ways, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Buying items on sale (a 57% global average)</li>
<li>Using coupons (40%)</li>
<li>Shopping at value retailers (37%), such as supercenters and dollar stores</li>
<li>Purchasing value packs (35%)</li>
<li>Shopping close to home/work (25%)</li>
<li>Stocking up (22%)</li>
<li>Switching to cheaper health and beauty products (18%)</li>
<li>Purchasing smaller packs with a lower unit price (17%)</li>
</ul>
<p>One in 10 consumers in the online study reported no belt-tightening practices in their household.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save-household-expenses.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23814" title="save-household-expenses" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save-household-expenses.jpg" alt="save-household-expenses" width="575" height="281" /></a></p>
<p>North Americans led the world in cost-cutting strategies and adopted a host of budget-shrinking tactics. Seven in ten respondents said they bought items on sale, which is 13% more than the global average. Both Asia Pacific (46%) and North American (59%) consumers indicated they presented coupons at a checkout, outstripping the 40% global average.</p>
<p>In the U.S. in particular, manufacturer coupon redemption hit record highs in 2009 after years of no growth or declining growth. Meanwhile, Canadians continued to shift spending to discount or value retailers—now accounting for over one-third of total grocery sales—as their neighbors to the south have done so over the past several years.  Whether prompted by high gas prices or environmental sensitivity, North American respondents were also the most likely to say they shop in stores close to home or the office.</p>
<p>Value packs and stock-up shopping trips were a popular option across regions, with consumers in Middle East/Africa/Pakistan and Europeans lagging slightly behind the global benchmark. Middle East/Africa/Pakistan consumers also had the lowest incidence of using coupons (11%), shopping on promotion (42%), patronizing value retailers (21%) or stocking up to save (12%). The use of coupons as a promotion tool is not a popular marketing method in the region. Additionally, the dearth of established retailers in the Middle East and Pakistan explains the low incidence of patronage.</p>
<p>Roughly one-quarter of Latin (23%) and North Americans (24%) said they sacrificed beauty at the budget altar by switching to cheaper health and beauty products. Asia Pacific and Middle East/Africa/Pakistan respondents were less likely than average to say they made such a switch to save money (15%).</p>
<p><strong>Cash is King; Dining In Trend Heats Up</strong><br />
Consumers found other ways to cope with the cash crunch as well. While 19% of the regions admitted to using credit cards more often, North America at 10% and Europe at 11% were well off that global average pace. Further supporting the belt-tightening approach, 31% of North Americans and 30% of Latin Americans said they recorded less credit card utilization versus the prior year, while only 20% of Europeans did, despite a precarious economic picture.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save_creditcards.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23815" title="Compared to Last Year, I am Using Credit Cards to Make Purchases..." src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/save_creditcards.jpg" alt="Compared to Last Year, I am Using Credit Cards to Make Purchases..." width="575" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>Foregoing credit was just one consumer coping mechanism. Based on survey findings, restaurants in some countries must be hungry for clients, as more than half of survey respondents said they ate out of the home less often than the year before. The dine-in trend was particularly strong in Latin America, North America, Europe and the Middle East.</p>
<p>Roughly one-fourth of residents of Indonesia, China, the Philippines, Hong Kong and India indicated that they were eating out more often than usual. Asia Pacific as a whole showed a 5% higher rate for eating out than the global average.</p>
<p>Dining out cutbacks appear to correlate with private label purchase patterns, with five of the top 10 “dining out less often” countries also landing on the top 10 “purchased more private label” list: Greece, Ireland, Spain, Turkey and Portugal—countries that continue to face significant economic challenges even as other parts of the world resume growth.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Note about online survey methodology</span><br />
<em>While online survey methodology allows for tremendous scale and global reach, it provides the perspectives on the habits of existing Internet users, not total populations. Where noted, the Nielsen Global Online Survey data is supplemented with consumption data by market.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-consumer-strategies-for-saving-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

