<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Kentucky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/kentucky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vehicle Purchase Intent Not Tied To State Unemployment Rate</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vehicle-purchase-intent-not-tied-to-state-unemployment-rate/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vehicle-purchase-intent-not-tied-to-state-unemployment-rate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loyalty programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Julie A. Enzweiler, Automotive – Research Director
One might assume that the unemployment rate at a state level would show a strong negative correlation to the likelihood to purchase a vehicle in the next six months, but this doesn&#8217;t appear to be the case.  Michigan had the highest unemployment rate at 11.6% in January 2009; however, these residents are slightly over-indexing for the likeliness to purchase a vehicle in the next six months.  It&#8217;s very interesting that Mississippi is the most likely state to purchase a vehicle and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9562" title="car keys" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/car_key.png" alt="" width="150" height="120" />By <a href="http://nielsen-online.com/blog/category/julie-enzweiler/">Julie A. Enzweiler</a>, Automotive – Research Director</p>
<p>One might assume that the unemployment rate at a state level would show a strong negative correlation to the likelihood to purchase a vehicle in the next six months, but this doesn&#8217;t appear to be the case.  Michigan had the highest unemployment rate at 11.6% in January 2009; however, these residents are slightly over-indexing for the likeliness to purchase a vehicle in the next six months.  It&#8217;s very interesting that Mississippi is the most likely state to purchase a vehicle and Idaho is the least likely, since both states fall in the middle of the heap for unemployment.</p>
<h3>January 2009 Unemployment Rate Vs. Likelihood To Purchase A Vehicle</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9567" title="auto purchase vs. unemployment" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/auto_unemployment.png" alt="" width="525" height="379" /></p>
<p>Solely looking at shopping intention by state is too high of a level to glean any actionable insight.  However, coupling intention with current vehicle ownership allows for smarter inventory planning and target marketing within each state.  Typically, we would be a bit more aggressive and aim to conquest more sales, but in the current economic condition we need to be more cognizant of advertising expenditures and ensure a high ROI.</p>
<p>In 2009 it will be imperative that automakers focus on the total customer experience of existing owners and consider developing loyalty programs.  It is much easier and cheaper to retain an owner than it is to make a conquest from a competing brand.  Nielsen @Plan data is indicating that Oklahoma residents are the second most likely to purchase a vehicle in the next six months and are also over-indexing on owning a Kia vehicle and Compact Sedans/Coupes.  There appears to be an opportunity for Kia to gain additional market share within Oklahoma especially with the Optima and Spectra.  Lincoln also has an opportunity in Mississippi with an ownership index of 286, while Chrysler may want to reduce their ad spend in this state and shift focus to areas that have a higher concentration of Chrysler owners such as Iowa, Kentucky and Michigan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vehicle-purchase-intent-not-tied-to-state-unemployment-rate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2008: Where Are The Independent Voters?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat-leaning Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican-leaning Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New England &#8212; according to a recent analysis from Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron.
The study, which asked respondents in 81 U.S. cities to select the political party label that best describes how they see themselves &#8211; regardless of how they may have voted in the past, found that Boston, Providence, R.I., and Hartford, Conn. have the highest percentages of adults who consider themselves to be &#8220;Independents.&#8221; 
In contrast, Pittsburgh, Lexington, K.Y., and Oklahoma City, O.K. have the smallest percentages of self-identified Independents. 

Nationally, 27% of adults consider themselves ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button16.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1683" title="Badge - 2008 election" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button16-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In New England &#8212; according to a recent analysis from Scarborough Research, a joint partnership with Nielsen and Arbitron.</p>
<p>The study, which asked respondents in 81 U.S. cities to select the political party label that best describes how they see themselves &#8211; regardless of how they may have voted in the past, found that Boston, Providence, R.I., and Hartford, Conn. have the highest percentages of adults who consider themselves to be &#8220;Independents.&#8221; </p>
<p>In contrast, Pittsburgh, Lexington, K.Y., and Oklahoma City, O.K. have the smallest percentages of self-identified Independents. </p>
<p><span id="more-1680"></span></p>
<p>Nationally, 27% of adults consider themselves to be politically Independent.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed Independents*</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Providence/New Bedford, RI</td>
<td>47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Hartford/New Haven, CT</td>
<td>41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Des Moines/Ames, IA</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Green Bay/Appleton, WI</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Spokane, WA</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Seattle/Tacoma, WA</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Grand Rapids/Kalamazoo/Battle Creek, MI</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: Self-Proclaimed Independents include those leaning Democrat and Republican.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Scarborough&#8217;s survey also examined “Leaning Independents” &#8212; those adults who described themselves in Scarborough&#8217;s study as “Independent, but feel closer to Democrat,” or “Independent, but feel closer to Republican.”</p>
<p>Seattle and Providence, R.I. had the highest percentages of Democrat-leaning Independents (17%), while Salt Lake City and Spokane, W.A. had the highest percentages of Republican-leaning Independents (15%).</p>
<p>Nationally, 9% of adults identified themselves as Democrat-leaning Independents, while 8% of adults characterized themselves as Republican-leaning Independents.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed<br />
Democrat-Leaning Independents</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed<br />
Democrat-Leaning Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Seattle, WA</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Providence, RI</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Des Moines, IA</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flint, MI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Austin, TX</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Honolulu, HI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 Local Markets:<br />
Self-Proclaimed<br />
Republican-Leaning Independents</th>
<th>% Self-Proclaimed<br />
Republican-Leaning Independents</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Salt Lake City, UT</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Spokane, WA</td>
<td>15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Grand Rapids, MI</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Birmingham, AL</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Indianapolis, IN</td>
<td>13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Green Bay, WI</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Milwaukee, WI</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Flint, MI</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Houston, TX</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: Scarborough Research, 2008.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://www.scarborough.com/press_releases/Politics%20FINAL%206.17.08.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/election-2008-where-are-the-independent-voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
