“Display advertising is expected to substantially expand in India as Internet penetration accelerates as well as the lower costs involved in advertising online.  It is an industry that has seen rapid growth in the past couple of years and has the potential to give traditional forms of advertising a run for their money,” said Karthik Nagarajan, Associate Director, Online Division at Nielsen.

Top Five Sectors in Online Advertising, June-August 2009

All measured media showed negative growth in this difficult economy, ranging from Spanish-Language Cable TV (-1.1%) to Local Sunday Supplements (-37.7%).

“These first quarter results will hardly come as a surprise to an advertising industry that’s struggling just like many other areas of the American economy,” said Annie Touliatos, VP of Sales Development for Monitor-Plus, Nielsen’s ad tracking service. “Now more than ever it’s important for buyers and sellers to adjust to the changing competitive landscape by carefully analyzing the wide range of advertising intelligence that Nielsen can offer.”

Download the full news release, including a breakdown of product category ad spend.

Nielsen’s VideoCensus provides timely statistics and insights into how consumers use video online.  This includes the size and demographic composition (age, gender, race, etc) of the viewing audience for each website, as well as important measurements like the total number of streams viewed and the time spent watching by the average viewer. All this information helps content providers and websites more effectively sell their assets and audience, while providing tools for advertisers trying to decide where to place an online video campaign.  In assembling this information, we use a number of different measurement technologies, each with its own advantages.

Why Nielsen uses samples to collect its research

• The only way to really report audience demographics (the age, gender, race and other characteristics of the person viewing video) is to actually measure what people – not computers – watch.  Because it is not possible to track the viewing of every user on every computer in the U.S., the best way to tell how many people are watching online video is to select a representative cross-section of the entire Internet population, monitor their viewing, and project the results to the population as a whole.  Just as a doctor only draws a small sample of blood to measure red and white blood cell counts, so too does Nielsen use samples (or panels) to measure Internet use.  Nielsen uses the same principles to measure TV ratings and consumer buying patterns.
• The key to accurate sample measurement is to create a panel in which every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected.  This ensures that the panel proportionately represents men and women, teens and adults, high and low income individuals, employees of large and small companies, and so on.  It’s also essential to represent both heavy and light users in proportion to the entire population.  If, for example, only heavy users were represented in our samples, our estimates would be too high and if only light users were selected our estimates would be too low.

How Nielsen’s VideoCensus panels are assembled

• Nielsen recruits its panelists through a number of methods, including email, online advertising, telephone calls and postal mailings.. Other Internet measurement companies rely exclusively on online recruitment, which skews the sample towards heavy users and typically overstates Internet activity.  Nielsen’s combination of recruitment tactics captures a broader spectrum of demographics and consumer behavior.
• The VideoCensus panel is composed of two separate samples:

– Nielsen recruits a very large sample through e-mail and online advertising.  The sample includes hundreds of thousands of households and allows for very granular measurement.  To make sure the information from this sample reflects the population as a whole, we adjust the data collected from this sample with a second, more representative Calibration Sample.

– The Calibration Sample is created by randomly identifying and actively recruiting panelists through their street addresses and phone numbers.  We are in direct contact with these panelists and pay them for their participation.  These are the same methodologies used to recruit TV ratings panelists. The “randomness” of this sample means it includes both heavy and light Internet users across all demographics, and is therefore more representative of the entire Internet universe. The combination of these two panels gives us the depth of a large sample balanced by the industry’s only truly random calibration sample.

How Nielsen collects Internet data from panels

• After panelists agree to participate in our panel, they install a Nielsen software “meter” on their computer, which enables Nielsen to measure their online and computer usage. When a panel member views a video, the meter communicates information about that activity to Nielsen. The panelist’s demographic information, the stream URL, and other site information are processed and reported within the VideoCensus system. (Note: Nielsen does not sell or publish user information.)

How Nielsen collect actual ‘Census’ viewing behavior

• Nielsen also directly measures the number of times a particular video is played. To improve the accuracy of this measurement, video networks or broadcast sites can embed a code or “tag” in their video players.  This process causes all viewers of content to send an anonymous ‘ping’ to Nielsen.  This so-called ‘census’ measurement makes it easy for Nielsen to identify and report the actual content or program being consumed, and allows us to report an actual count of times that content is played back.

Why Nielsen combines panel and website data

• Nielsen’s panel data provides the audience demographics of viewers, which is the industry’s ‘currency’ for media planning.  Census measurement provides the actual count of the times content is consumed and is typically the method used by online publishers and advertisers for selling and buying impressions.
• Nielsen combines the datasets and provides reporting that includes unique viewers, total streams, demographic composition, and time spent viewing.

Why Nielsen’s data differs from the clients’ internal server-based counts

• The most frequently debated number in online measurement is unique audience.  Website analytics systems (what we call ‘internal’ data) count cookies or Internet browsers, but not people.  These systems overstate audience for a number of reasons.
• If you visit a website from home and from work, generally that website counts you as two visitors.  If you regularly delete your cookies, each time you visit that website you’ll be counted as a new visitor.  Panel data collected by Nielsen, by contrast, measures actual people and projects their activity to a carefully enumerated Internet universe.

Why Nielsen’s numbers are usually lower than those from other measurement companies

• Because our randomly selected Calibration Panel includes both heavy and light users, our data is a more accurate reflection of the entire online universe.  Other measurement companies create their panels from people who answer online solicitation and who tend to be heavy users.  As a result, other measurement companies sometimes report numbers that are even higher than the internal server counts from the websites they are measuring.

Nielsen Online CEO John Burbank takes a look at the economic and advertising impacts of the report.

Highlights Of The Report Include

• The number of American users frequenting online video destinations has climbed 339 percent since 2003.
• Time spent on video sites has shot up almost 2,000 percent over the same period.
• In the last year alone, unique viewers of online video grew 10 percent, the number of streams grew 41 percent, the streams per user grew 27 percent and the total minutes engaged with online video grew 71 percent.
• There are 87 percent more online social media users now than in 2003, with 883 percent more time devoted to those sites.
• In the last year alone, time spent on social networking sites has surged 73 percent.
• In February, social network usage exceeded Web-based e-mail usage for the first time.

Read the full report.

Download the full press release

When it comes to auto ads, MySpace continues to garner more overall ad spend: Honda, Chevrolet, Ford, Nissan and Toyota all recently ran ads, with the Honda Fit campaign generating more than 600 million ad impressions in the first quarter of 2009.  A year earlier, Toyota generated over 2.5 billion impressions for its Matrix.  This year, Toyota has allocated more of its ad dollars to Facebook.

As Facebook continues to grow, it will be interesting to track whether the automotive ad spending follows. To receive detailed monthly updates on the auto industry contact Julie Enzweiler

The automotive industry was hit by a Mack truck the second half of 2008 with all-time high gas prices, a shrinking economy and growing consumer fear of making a large purchase.  Advertising spend reflects how the automotive industry reacted to the crisis, highlighting channels that are the most vital to intercepting new vehicle prospects.

The first half of 2008 showed growth in advertising spend over 2007 for TV (+2%) and Internet (+55%) while outdoor, magazine, radio and paper decreased (20%, 18%, 14%, and 4%, respectively).  The second half of 2008 yielded a lower advertising spend over 2007 across all channels.  Radio and paper took the biggest hits with decreases of 42 percent and 40 percent, while Internet exhibited a similar level of spend vs. 2007 with only a 0.5 percent decrease.  Overall automotive advertising spend decreased 8.2 percent from 2007 to 2008, with the Internet being the only channel to witness growth.

Automotive Estimated Ad Spend: 2007 – 2008

Trended on a monthly basis, automotive Internet advertising was outpacing 2007 until October 2008 when the brakes were applied and it dipped below 2007 levels for the first time.  Automotive Internet spending in 2007 represented 4.6 percent of total Internet spend rising to 5.9 percent in 2008.  Acura, Hyundai and Subaru contributed the largest increase in Internet spend from 2007 to 2008 while Mercury, Volvo and Jeep had the largest decrease.  Thus far, Internet spend for 2009 is once again gaining momentum and is forecast to be on par with Q1 07 while still slightly below Q1 08.

Auto Internet Ad Spend As % Of Total Internet Spend

The Internet is proving to be a critical strategic channel for automakers and we anticipate the trend to continue.  Although TV continues to represent roughly three-quarters of total advertising spend, the Internet could likely become the second largest advertising channel by 2010.  The key to successful Internet spend in 2009 will be identifying where your target audience goes online and interjecting yourself at the right moment in the vehicle purchase funnel.

“The 2008 race has been lametastic when it comes to online advertising,” Shields wrote, adding: “McCain’s been nearly invisible when it comes to display advertising.”

Senator McCain placed 16 million online display ad impressions in June, while Sen. Obama ran 80 million impressions, Shields noted, citing Nielsen Online data. 

View additional Nielsen Online advertising data for the 2008 presidential candidates.