<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Huffington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/huffington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Audience Analysis: Behind the AOL/Huffington Post Deal</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-huffington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-huffington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TheHuffingtonPost.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Huffington Post made its own headlines last week when it was acquired by AOL for a reported $315 million, The Nielsen Company analyzed what the Huffington Post’s audience brings to the AOL portfolio in the U.S., specifically among notable demographic groups.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Huffington Post made its own headlines last week when it was acquired by AOL for a reported $315 million, The Nielsen Company analyzed what the Huffington Post’s audience brings to the AOL portfolio in the U.S., specifically among notable demographic groups.</p>
<p>With 13.2 million unique U.S. visitors in January 2011, the Huffington Post was the ninth <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/">most popular non-financial news website</a> visited from home and work computers in the U.S. Its new ‘sister’ site, AOL News, was the fourth most-popular with 22.1 million U.S.-based unique visitors. AOL News is AOL&#8217;s second most popular channel – behind MapQuest – and, in effect, the Huffington Post becomes AOL&#8217;s sixth most popular property just behind AOL Messenger/AIM (with 13.3 million uniques in January) and ahead of AOL Music (with 13.1 million).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> Key Metrics for January 2011 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Entity</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Active Reach</th>
<th> Avg Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
<th> Pages Viewed Per Person</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Media Network</td>
<td>76,173</td>
<td>38.5%</td>
<td>1:58:31</td>
<td>85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL News</td>
<td>22,060</td>
<td>11.2%</td>
<td>0:14:00</td>
<td>15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Huffington Post</td>
<td>13,266</td>
<td>6.7%</td>
<td>0:11:39</td>
<td>18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Read as: During January 2011, 76.2 million unique U.S. people visited an AOL Media Network property using a PC/laptop from home or work locations.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>AOL’s network of websites attracted 76.2 million unique U.S. visitors in January 2011, or 39 percent of all active U.S. web users. Visitors to AOL’s websites spent an average of 1 hour 58 minutes during the month, viewing 85 pages on average. Based on average visitor January figures, each Huffington Post reader adds almost 12 minutes of time and 18 pages to the AOL portfolio &#8211; a total of 155 million minutes and 237 million page views.</p>
<p>Although the Huffington Post had 13.2 million U.S. uniques in January, almost 10.2 million of them also visited an AOL website, thus the net effect of AOL’s acquisition is almost 3.1 million new visitors or 1.5 percent more reach into the active U.S. Internet population. There is also a strong overlap between the Huffington Post and AOL News. In January 2011, 44 percent of visitors to the Huffington Post also visited AOL News; with 27 percent of AOL News readers also visiting the Huffington Post.</p>
<p>It’s not just about the extra readers the acquisition brings but the type of visitor. Although the audience makeup to AOL News and the Huffington Post is broadly similar, the latter is more concentrated around certain demographic groups. For example, the Huffington Post has a higher concentration (34%) of 18-49 year old females compared to 29 pecent for AOL News. The Internet average is 27 percent.</p>
<p>Although the audiences to the two entities are spread similarly geographically across the U.S., it is notable that the Huffington Post is more likely to have visitors from the West Coast while AOL News tends to have a greater concentration of visitors from New England.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-26341" title="Huffington Post pageviews by education" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/2758_HuffPochart4.jpg" alt="Huffington Post pageviews by education" width="572" height="550" /></p>
<p>The Huffington Post audience also tends to be more highly-educated – 44 percent hold a bachelor or post-graduate degree, compared to 37 percent for AOL News, 31 percent across the entire AOL portfolio and 25 percent across the entire web.</p>
<p>A very encouraging element of Huffington Post reader behavior for AOL concerns who consumes content. Visitors from households with incomes above $150,000 account for twice the percentage of total page views consumed on Huffington Post (12%) than they account for on AOL News (7%) and across the entire Internet (6%).</p>
<p>Those with a bachelor’s degree account for 50 percent more of Huffington Post content (33%) compared to AOL News (24%) and the Internet average (22%). Most starkly, those with a post-grad degree account for almost three times the percentage of Huffington Post content (34%) than they average across the whole Internet and AOL News (both 12%).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-huffington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2011: Top U.S. Web Brands and News Sites</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top U.S. Web brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As in December 2010, the same brands were featured amongst the 10 most popular online in the U.S. in January 2011 except for Wikipedia replacing Amazon (now 11th). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As in December 2010, the same brands were featured amongst the 10 most popular online in the U.S. in January 2011 except for Wikipedia replacing Amazon (now 11th). There was also only one change to the brands featuring compared to the same period a year ago, January 2010, with Ask Search Network replacing Fox Interactive Media, whose stable of sites includes MySpace and Photobucket. </p>
<p>Amongst January 2011&#8217;s U.S. top 10, Wikipedia (+6.7%) and MSN (+4.2%) saw the greatest monthly increase in Unique Visitors through PCs/laptops from home and work locations.</p>
<p>While Facebook, by some way, had the highest average time per person, Ask Search Network saw the greatest gain in monthly time spent, with the average visitor spending just under 11 minutes, up 16.4% from December 2010.  Wikipedia, Facebook and Google shared similar growth in time spent, up 6.8%, 6.6% and 6%, respectively.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="6">	Top 10 U.S. Web Brands for January 2011 (Home and Work Locations)											</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	Rank	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Unique Audience (000)	</th>
<th>	Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in UA	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in Time PP	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Google	</td>
<td>	153,623	</td>
<td>	     1:21:00	</td>
<td>	-0.1%	</td>
<td>	6.0%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Facebook	</td>
<td>	135,622	</td>
<td>	     7:24:12	</td>
<td>	0.0%	</td>
<td>	6.6%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	Yahoo!	</td>
<td>	130,854	</td>
<td>	     2:20:10	</td>
<td>	-1.1%	</td>
<td>	2.1%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	MSN/WindowsLive/Bing	</td>
<td>	121,019	</td>
<td>	     1:26:39	</td>
<td>	4.2%	</td>
<td>	-0.8%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	YouTube	</td>
<td>	103,868	</td>
<td>	     1:21:54	</td>
<td>	-1.9%	</td>
<td>	-0.1%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Microsoft	</td>
<td>	90,221	</td>
<td>	     0:41:53	</td>
<td>	-0.2%	</td>
<td>	-3.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	AOL Media Network	</td>
<td>	76,173	</td>
<td>	     1:58:31	</td>
<td>	0.0%	</td>
<td>	-0.2%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Wikipedia	</td>
<td>	65,698	</td>
<td>	     0:15:31	</td>
<td>	6.7%	</td>
<td>	6.8%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Ask Search Network	</td>
<td>	65,454	</td>
<td>	     0:10:40	</td>
<td>	0.3%	</td>
<td>	16.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Apple	</td>
<td>	63,296	</td>
<td>	     1:18:48	</td>
<td>	-6.2%	</td>
<td>	-6.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Source: The Nielsen Company											</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Read as: During January 2011, 153.6 million unique U.S. people visited Google using PC/laptops from home and work locations 											</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart --></p>
<p>When looking at the ten most popular Current Events and Global News sites, each saw month-over-month growth in their audience, as is often the case between December and January.  Yahoo! News was the top site in the category with 46.3 million unique U.S. visitors, up 6% from December 2010.  Yahoo! was followed by CNN Digital Network (+15%) and MSNBC Digital Network (+15.7%), both with double-digit gains in visitors.</p>
<p>Acquired by AOL earlier in the week, The Huffington Post was the #9 news site in January drawing 13.3 million unique visitors who averaged nearly 12 minutes on the site.  Huff Post’s new sister site &#8211; AOL News &#8211; ranked #4 with 22.1 million unique visitors from home/work computers.</p>
<p>Although the Huff Post is now part of the same stable as AOL News, there was already some overlap amongst their audiences. In January 2011, 27% of US visitors to AOL News also visited Huff Post, while 44% of visitors to Huff Post also visited AOL News in that same month.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="6">	Top 10 U.S. Current Events &#038; Global News Sites for January 2011 (Home &#038; Work)											</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	Rank	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Unique Audience (000)	</th>
<th>	Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in UA	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in Time PP	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Yahoo! News	</td>
<td>	46,274	</td>
<td>	0:14:54	</td>
<td>	6.0%	</td>
<td>	22.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	CNN Digital Network	</td>
<td>	37,008	</td>
<td>	0:22:37	</td>
<td>	15.0%	</td>
<td>	22.7%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	MSNBC Digital Network	</td>
<td>	32,494	</td>
<td>	0:16:36	</td>
<td>	15.7%	</td>
<td>	13.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	AOL News	</td>
<td>	22,060	</td>
<td>	0:14:00	</td>
<td>	3.9%	</td>
<td>	0.2%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Tribune Newspapers	</td>
<td>	16,929	</td>
<td>	0:10:10	</td>
<td>	21.7%	</td>
<td>	3.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Fox News Digital Network	</td>
<td>	16,652	</td>
<td>	0:19:14	</td>
<td>	16.0%	</td>
<td>	-1.8%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	NYTimes.com	</td>
<td>	15,503	</td>
<td>	0:15:15	</td>
<td>	24.0%	</td>
<td>	8.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	ABCNEWS Digital Network	</td>
<td>	14,551	</td>
<td>	0:05:55	</td>
<td>	11.2%	</td>
<td>	0.6%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	TheHuffingtonPost.com	</td>
<td>	13,266	</td>
<td>	0:11:39	</td>
<td>	12.0%	</td>
<td>	-18.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Gannett Newspapers and Newspaper Division	</td>
<td>	12,763	</td>
<td>	0:18:04	</td>
<td>	20.4%	</td>
<td>	22.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Source: The Nielsen Company											</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Read as: During January 2011, 46.3 million unique U.S. people visited Yahoo! News using PC/laptops from home and work locations											</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Note: The &#8220;Current Events &#038; Global News&#8221; category does not include financial news sites such as Wall Street Journal, Reuters, etc.  These sites are in a separate &#8220;Finanical News &#038; Info&#8221; category											</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart --></p>
<p>When looking at overall computer and Internet usage, U.S. Internet users spent more time online (+10%), visited more domains (+5.3%), engaged in more sessions (+3.5%) and viewed more pages (+3.5%) during January than they did last month.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="4">	Average U.S. Internet Usage for January 2011 (Home &#038; Work)							</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	Metrics	</th>
<th>	Current Month	</th>
<th>	Previous Month	</th>
<th>	% Change	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Sessions/Visits per Person	</td>
<td>	59	</td>
<td>	57	</td>
<td>	3.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Domains Visited per Person	</td>
<td>	99	</td>
<td>	94	</td>
<td>	5.3%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Web Page Views per Person	</td>
<td>	2,750	</td>
<td>	2,656	</td>
<td>	3.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	PC Time per Person	</td>
<td>	    61:27:19	</td>
<td>	    55:53:03	</td>
<td>	10.0%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Duration of a Web Page viewed	</td>
<td>	     0:00:58	</td>
<td>	     0:00:55	</td>
<td>	3.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Active Digital Media Universe	</td>
<td>	197,842,270	</td>
<td>	198,595,819	</td>
<td>	-0.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Current Digital Media Universe Estimate	</td>
<td>	242,999,000	</td>
<td>	240,813,000	</td>
<td>	0.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">	Source: The Nielsen Company							</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demand For Political News Boosts Sept. Traffic To U.S. News Sites</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/demand-for-political-news-boosts-sept-traffic-to-us-news-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/demand-for-political-news-boosts-sept-traffic-to-us-news-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anchorage Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC Digital Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Boston Globe website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TheHuffingtonPost.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top newspaper websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online news outlets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique visitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=3040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen Online, in September NYTimes.com was the top U.S.-based online newspaper site, while MSNBC Digital Network (MSNBC) was the top U.S. online news outlet, Editor &#38; Publisher reported this week.
The NY Times&#8217; website drew just over 20 million unique visitors in September &#8212; a 37% increase over unique traffic to the site last September.



Sept. 2008 Rank
Top 10 
Newspaper Sites
(ranked by unique users)
Sept. 2008 Unique Traffic
(in 000’s)
% Growth
Vs. Sept. 2007 Unique Traffic


1
NYTimes.com
20,068
37%


2
washingtonpost.com
12,956
43%


3
USATODAY.com
11,439
33%


4
LA Times
10,022
102%


5
Wall Street Journal Online
9,047
94%


6
Boston.com
8,610
122%


7
SFGate.com/San Francisco Chronicle
5,129
18%


8
New York Post
4,815
98%


9
Politico
4,605
219%


10
Chicago Tribune
4,558
46%


Source: The Nielsen Company (September 2008).



Meanwhile, MSNBC saw 44% year over year growth, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/online_news-better-option.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3046" title="online_news-better-option" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/online_news-better-option-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>According to Nielsen Online, in September NYTimes.com was the top U.S.-based online newspaper site, while MSNBC Digital Network (MSNBC) was the top U.S. online news outlet, <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com" target="_blank">Editor &amp; Publisher</a> reported this week.</p>
<p>The NY Times&#8217; website drew just over 20 million unique visitors in September &#8212; a 37% increase over unique traffic to the site last September.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Sept. 2008 Rank</th>
<th>Top 10 <br />
Newspaper Sites<br />
(ranked by unique users)</th>
<th>Sept. 2008 Unique Traffic<br />
(in 000’s)</th>
<th>% Growth<br />
Vs. Sept. 2007 Unique Traffic</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NYTimes.com</td>
<td>20,068</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>washingtonpost.com</td>
<td>12,956</td>
<td>43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>USATODAY.com</td>
<td>11,439</td>
<td>33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>LA Times</td>
<td>10,022</td>
<td>102%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Wall Street Journal Online</td>
<td>9,047</td>
<td>94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>8,610</td>
<td>122%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>SFGate.com/San Francisco Chronicle</td>
<td>5,129</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>New York Post</td>
<td>4,815</td>
<td>98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Politico</td>
<td>4,605</td>
<td>219%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Chicago Tribune</td>
<td>4,558</td>
<td>46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (September 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Meanwhile, MSNBC saw 44% year over year growth, reaching 43.2 million unique visitors in September, according to Nielsen.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Sept. 2008 Rank</th>
<th>Top 10<br />
Online News Outlets<br />
(ranked by unique users)</th>
<th>Sept. 2008 Unique Traffic<br />
(in 000’s)</th>
<th>% Growth<br />
Vs. Sept. 2007 Unique Traffic</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>MSNBC Digital Network</td>
<td>43,211</td>
<td>44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! News</td>
<td>38,073</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>CNN Digital Network</td>
<td>37,277</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL News</td>
<td>21,419</td>
<td>2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>NYTimes.com</td>
<td>20,068</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Tribune Newspapers</td>
<td>18,033</td>
<td>46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>ABCNEWS Digital Network</td>
<td>17,181</td>
<td>87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fox News Digital Network</td>
<td>14,864</td>
<td>91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Gannett Newspapers and Newspaper Division</td>
<td>13,689</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Google News</td>
<td>13,502</td>
<td>39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (September 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-3040"></span></p>
<p>Surging interest in the U.S. presidential campaign likely drove growth for several U.S. news sites in September. </p>
<p>The Anchorage Daily News in Alaska cracked Nielsen&#8217;s top 30 newspaper websites ranking for the first time, following a 928% jump in unique visitors over last September.  Sudden demand for news on Republican Vice Presidential nominee and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin in September may have driven that dramatic increase. </p>
<p>Two politics-centric sites, Politico.com (+219%) and TheHuffingtonPost.com (+457%), also saw notably large year over year percentage growth in September.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Boston.com&#8217;s 122% above average growth can perhaps be attributed to Autumn baseball fever in the Hub.</p>
<p>Overall, all but three of the top 30 online news outlets, and all but one of the top 30 newspaper websites, attracted larger online audiences in September 2008 than they did the prior September.</p>
<p>View the <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003875202" target="_blank">top 30 newspaper websites</a> for September in Editor &amp; Publisher.</p>
<p>View the <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003875895" target="_blank">top 30 online news outlets</a> for September in Editor &amp; Publisher.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in the (Toronto) <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20081030.CAMPAIGNPOLITICO30/TPStory/International" target="_blank">Globe and Mail</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/demand-for-political-news-boosts-sept-traffic-to-us-news-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

