<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Streets of San Francisco Have Greenest Automotive Potential</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/streets-of-san-francisco-have-greenest-automotive-potential/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/streets-of-san-francisco-have-greenest-automotive-potential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claritas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda Fit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mini Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation and targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota Prius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yaris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco loves its green cars more than any other area in the U.S., according to new research from Nielsen.  The new data from Nielsen Claritas&#8217; PRIZM Market Potential Report finds that households in San Francisco are 60 percent more likely to buy a green vehicle than the average U.S. home, with Washington D.C. 44 percent more likely and New York City 31 percent more likely.
&#8220;These estimates help manufacturers and marketers better understand the markets that have &#8216;green&#8217; potential, and help them focus their resources,&#8221; said Bruce Wilkinson, Vice ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Francisco loves its green cars more than any other area in the U.S., according to new research from Nielsen.  The new data from Nielsen Claritas&#8217; PRIZM Market Potential Report finds that households in San Francisco are 60 percent more likely to buy a green vehicle than the average U.S. home, with Washington D.C. 44 percent more likely and New York City 31 percent more likely.</p>
<p>&#8220;These estimates help manufacturers and marketers better understand the markets that have &#8216;green&#8217; potential, and help them focus their resources,&#8221; said Bruce Wilkinson, Vice President of Media and Communications for Nielsen Claritas. &#8220;Additionally, it helps them to plan media campaigns and determine inventory levels for each model, market-by-market.&#8221;</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Cities With Top Market Potential For Green Autos</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> CITY</th>
<th> Potential Buyers</th>
<th> Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">San Francisco et al, CA</td>
<td>11,184</td>
<td>160</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Washington et al, DC-MD</td>
<td>9,301</td>
<td>144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">New York, NY</td>
<td>27,417</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Boston et al, MA-NH</td>
<td>8,625</td>
<td>129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">San Diego, CA</td>
<td>3,842</td>
<td>129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Chicago, IL</td>
<td>12,218</td>
<td>125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Monterey-Salinas, CA</td>
<td>807</td>
<td>125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Honolulu, HI</td>
<td>1,525</td>
<td>124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Los Angeles, CA</td>
<td>19,519</td>
<td>122</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Baltimore, MD</td>
<td>3,765</td>
<td>122</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The research looked at the national ownership rates of high-mileage vehicles including the Honda Fit, Toyota Prius, Toyota Yaris and Mini Cooper. Using auto registration data from RL Polk and Nielsen’s PRIZM segmentation, the percentage of each segment owning these vehicles was calculated.  Individual market potential then was calculated based upon the segment composition of each market.</p>
<p><span id="more-12896"></span></p>
<p>The top ten was made up primarily of coastal metropolitan area, including Boston (4th), San Diego (5th), Chicago (6th) and Los Angeles (9th), all with populations of over one million. Two exceptions were the relatively small areas of Monterey-Salinas, CA (7th), which has a population of 234,000 and Honolulu, HI (8th), with a population of 442,000.</p>
<p>Places where gas guzzlers still rule the road tended toward the south and Midwest, with the states of West Virginia and Mississippi holding seven of the ten areas that had the lowest rates of green auto ownership.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Cities With Lowest Market Potential For Green Autos</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> CITY</th>
<th> Potential Buyers</th>
<th> Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Glendive, MT</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Charleston et al, WV</td>
<td>738</td>
<td>55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tri-Cities, TN-VA</td>
<td>504</td>
<td>54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clarksburg-Weston, WV</td>
<td>168</td>
<td>54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hattiesburg-Laurel, MS</td>
<td>161</td>
<td>53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Columbus et al, MS</td>
<td>263</td>
<td>50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Presque Isle, ME</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Bluefield et al, WV</td>
<td>194</td>
<td>48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Meridian, MS</td>
<td>97</td>
<td>48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Greenwood-Greenville, MS</td>
<td>98</td>
<td>46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Learn more about <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/tab/expertise/segmentation_and_targeting" target="_blank">Segmentation &amp; Targeting</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/streets-of-san-francisco-have-greenest-automotive-potential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Taking Small Steps in Household Energy Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/americans-taking-small-steps-in-household-energy-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/americans-taking-small-steps-in-household-energy-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact flourescent bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Claritas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumers are open to making energy-saving lifestyle changes. But, they are still far from becoming active managers of their household energy use, per new research from Nielsen Claritas. The annual Convergence Audit drew on data from more than 32,000 respondents replying both online and through the mail about their energy behavior.
While consumers are generally on board with energy conscious products, their green behavior has yet to extend to their habits in monitoring and paying for the energy in their homes.
Services offered by local utilities such as whole house energy audits, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-12365" title="bulb" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bulb.png" alt="" width="150" height="113" />Consumers are open to making energy-saving lifestyle changes. But, they are still far from becoming active managers of their household energy use, per new research from Nielsen Claritas. The annual Convergence Audit drew on data from more than 32,000 respondents replying both online and through the mail about their energy behavior.</p>
<p>While consumers are generally on board with energy conscious products, their green behavior has yet to extend to their habits in monitoring and paying for the energy in their homes.</p>
<p>Services offered by local utilities such as whole house energy audits, energy efficient HVAC rebates and weatherization services were only used by 2 percent of respondents in the past year. Energy efficient appliance rebates were used by 4 percent.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-12366" title="cfl_ownership" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cfl_ownership.png" alt="" width="291" height="349" />Similarly, online energy services, such as real-time pricing, load management, and service consumption monitoring were adopted by only 3 to 5 percent of consumers in the past year.</p>
<p>With the energy industry poised for major changes, including a heavier reliance on technology in monitoring and delivery, the report emphasizes that energy providers have major opportunities if they can educate their customers to become more active in their energy use.</p>
<p>Respondents showed a continued interest in energy-efficient equipment in the home, with 25 percent of consumers having purchased an Energy Star certified appliance, lighting product, or heating or cooling equipment in the last year. However this percentage fell from 27 percent last year.</p>
<p>Energy conserving compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) have shown strong adoption with 71 percent of consumers using at least one bulb in their homes.  Nearly a third (30 percent) of those surveyed said they are using more than six.</p>
<p>One indicator that going green is not just a trend for younger consumers is that CFL use appears to increase with age. While 64 percent of those aged 18 to 34 are using the bulbs, so are 70 percent of adults 35-54 and 74 percent of consumers 55 and older.</p>
<p>Ownership of CFLs is highest among those with higher income and education levels, with 76 percent use among those making over $100,000 a year.</p>
<p>Download the complete <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/energy-trends-white-paper.pdf">Convergence Audit</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/americans-taking-small-steps-in-household-energy-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winning at Green Innovation: Room for growth in untapped markets</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/winning-at-green-innovation-room-for-growth-in-untapped-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/winning-at-green-innovation-room-for-growth-in-untapped-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Mooth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=15555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Half of Americans say they want to buy green products, but don&#8217;t. As the market has become more crowded - and the offerings more complex - consumers have also become more sophisticated. While the payout for successfully launching a new product as green can be substantial, getting there requires a unique approach.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/content/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/home/insights/consumer_insight/issue_16/winning_at_green_innovation.mbc.3534.ImageSrc.jpg" alt="" width="542" height="151" /></p>
<p><em><strong>Robert Mooth, Vice President, Client Consulting, Nielsen BASES</strong></em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>SUMMARY:</strong> Half of Americans say they want to buy green products, but don’t. As the market has become more crowded &#8211; and the offerings more complex &#8211; consumers have also become more sophisticated. While the payout for successfully launching a new product as green can be substantial, getting there requires a unique approach.</p></blockquote>
<p>When it comes to &#8216;going green&#8217;, the size of the opportunity is clear. The Natural Marketing Institute (NMI) estimates that the size of the green marketplace (defined as products that are organic, natural or have an environmentally friendly benefit for the purpose of this analysis), is expected to reach $420 billion by 2010. In addition, hundreds of certification programs now offer &#8216;eco-labels&#8217; for green products. Yet evidence shows that there is still room for growth into untapped segments, as nearly half of American adults say they want to buy green products, but end up choosing conventional ones instead. How can marketers satisfy the consumer who aspires to buy green with innovations that also rationalize with a stable of &#8216;traditional&#8217; branded products?</p>
<p><strong>The rewards might justify the effort<br />
</strong>Successfully developing and positioning a new product as &#8216;green&#8217; can present different challenges from traditional new product launches. In addition to having a compelling consumer proposition, it’s also necessary to redefine competitors (are they green or traditional?), account for new pricing dynamics, adapt marketing communications tactics, and understand a new group of target consumers.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>Green products can offer higher-than-normal incremental growth&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The payout, however, can be substantial. Nielsen BASES and NMI experience shows that green products generate healthy consumer purchase interest and have an easier time standing out from the competition, often resulting in solid volume potential for green initiatives. And while line extensions to major brands are often highly cannibalistic, green products can offer higher-than-normal incremental growth. As an added bonus, green products frequently command a premium price, giving manufacturers an opportunity to build profitability by line extending without being locked into line pricing.</p>
<p><strong>LOHAS consumer model<br />
</strong>NMI has interviewed U.S. consumers for their attitudes and behaviors toward sustainability and environmental concerns every year since 2002. From this knowledge, the LOHAS (Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability) segmentation model has been developed that classifies consumers into one of five groups, depending on their awareness and involvement in green issues.</p>
<p><img id="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16#Par.52674.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16.Par.52674.Image.gif" alt="" width="445" height="311" /></p>
<p>The five LOHAS segments as defined by NMI include:</p>
<ul>
<li>LOHAS (17%) &#8211; active environmental stewards dedicated to personal and planetary health. These are the heaviest purchasers of green/socially-responsible products and the early adapters who influence others heavily.</li>
<li>NATURALITES (17%) &#8211; motivated primarily by personal health considerations. Tend to purchase more LOHAS consumable products vs. durable items.</li>
<li>DRIFTERS (24%) &#8211; while their intentions may be good, DRIFTERS follow trends when it’s easy and affordable. They are currently quite engaged in green purchasing behaviors.</li>
<li>CONVENTIONALS (26%) &#8211; pragmatists who embrace LOHAS behavior when they believe they can make a difference, but are primarily focused on being very careful with their resources and doing the &#8216;right&#8217; thing because it will save them money.</li>
<li>UNCONCERNED (16%) &#8211; either unaware or unconcerned about the environment and societal issues mainly because they don’t have the time or the means &#8211; these consumers are largely focused on getting by.</li>
</ul>
<p>Combining the LOHAS segmentation model with Nielsen BASES experience provides a unique lens for understanding opportunities for innovation in green.</p>
<p><strong>Green doesn’t have to be niche<br />
</strong>Many of the earliest entrants into the green segment were niche items due to a narrow consumer base, targeted benefits, premium pricing, and limited availability. However, these factors are all changing rapidly. In fact, as Nielsen examined over 400 green initiatives tested in BASES over the past two years, it was found that average consumer purchase interest fell nearly in the exact middle of the respective BASES Database.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>Green has evolved to where it can be a mainstream consumer proposition&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Green has evolved to where it can be a mainstream consumer proposition in many categories. While nearly 20% of consumers fall into the LOHAS &#8216;environmental steward&#8217; category, more than 60% have at least some interest in green, and are willing to try products that are relevant to their needs.</p>
<p><strong>Extend an established brand equity<br />
</strong>Branding is, of course, one of the primary considerations for green initiatives. Many of the early entries into the green segment were built around new brands to compete credibly. As consumer awareness and interest in green has evolved, mainstream brands have attempted to play in the green space as well.</p>
<p>The question is, should you try to extend an established brand equity into the green space, or invest behind a new one? Perhaps surprisingly, most consumers show a clear preference for buying green products from traditional brands. Even the LOHAS consumer segment is open to buying green products from established brands. While not all established equities could stretch into green, marketers should give preference to exploring the potential for brand extension for efficiency’s sake.</p>
<p><img id="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16#Par.14233.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16.Par.14233.Image.gif" alt="" width="429" height="280" /></p>
<p><strong>Getting beyond &#8216;niche&#8217;<br />
</strong>To win at green, appealing to the LOHAS consumer is typically a critical first step. However, being successful in the mass market likely means that you need to move beyond the LOHAS consumer and attract another consumer group to your initiative. In Nielsen BASES experience, this broader appeal is what sets the strongest green initiatives apart from the weaker ones. The stronger green new product initiatives demonstrate similar growth in volume potential from LOHAS consumers as well as consumers in other segments.</p>
<p><img id="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16#Par.20928.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16.Par.20928.Image.gif" alt="" width="383" height="259" /></p>
<p>One of the keys to succeeding will be to set a strategy for attracting one or more other segments beyond the involved LOHAS consumer to the initiative and optimizing communication for the target. Green products often have a dual communication challenge &#8211; convincing consumers that the new product delivers on both its primary benefit as well as its green promise. Some consumers will need reassurance on the core promise, while others will need to be convinced that it is truly green. Different segments will likely respond to different messages and features, so these choices are critical.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="0" width="200" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #6ea3ba; font-size: small;"><strong>Manufacturers cannot afford to lower the bar&#8230;</strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Few consumers will compromise<br />
</strong>After paying a premium for most green products, most consumers are unwilling to make concessions on product performance. Post-use responses to green products in the Nielsen BASES Database indicate that consumers are nearly twice as likely to suggest that green foods improve their taste and that green household products improve their efficacy, relative to their feedback for traditional products. When trying a green household product or food for the first time, some triers may well be hypersensitive to aspects like taste and effectiveness. Regardless of ingoing expectations, it should be clear that manufacturers cannot afford to lower the bar, as consumers are unlikely to make repeat purchases for items that sacrifice performance for green benefits.</p>
<p><img id="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16#Par.8945.Image " src="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/images/pictures/consumer_insight/issue_16.Par.8945.Image.gif" alt="" width="438" height="305" /></p>
<p><strong>The right target</strong><br />
While the weakening economy shows signs of slowing the growth of green, we believe the longer term green shift will persist. Innovation in green will continue to be an area that grocers and manufacturers can leverage to differentiate themselves from the competition. Winning at green starts with relevant product ideas, but breaking through to a broad audience likely requires a more sophisticated targeting and communication strategy. Making thoughtful choices in this area could represent the difference between an initiative being a &#8216;nice little idea&#8217; or becoming the next big thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/winning-at-green-innovation-room-for-growth-in-untapped-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
