<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Web Brands and Parent Companies for October 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=17889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported October 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported October 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Parent Companies/Divisions for October 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Parent Company</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>156,635</td>
<td>2:34:50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>138,773</td>
<td>2:06:16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>134,745</td>
<td>3:06:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>107,482</td>
<td>6:09:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL LLC</td>
<td>91,205</td>
<td>2:30:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>News Corp. Online</td>
<td>79,817</td>
<td>1:28:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>InterActiveCorp</td>
<td>71,310</td>
<td>0:16:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>66,191</td>
<td>1:25:29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>63,372</td>
<td>0:26:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Wikimedia Foundation</td>
<td>62,084</td>
<td>0:17:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Example:  The data indicates that 62.1 million home and work Internet users visited at least one of the Wikimedia Foundation-owned sites or launched a Wikimedia Foundation-owned application during the month, and each person spent, on average, a total of 17 minutes and 7 seconds at one or more of their sites or applications.</p>
<p>The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.<span id="_marker"><br />
</span><br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Web Brands for October 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>147,861</td>
<td>1:53:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>133,537</td>
<td>3:06:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>112,340</td>
<td>1:57:40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>107,482</td>
<td>6:09:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>93,824</td>
<td>0:45:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>91,205</td>
<td>2:30:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>90,396</td>
<td>1:12:41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>61,987</td>
<td>1:44:08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>61,881</td>
<td>0:17:03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>59,580</td>
<td>1:14:14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home &amp; Work, Month of October 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metrics</th>
<th> Oct-09</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Pages per Person</td>
<td>2,645</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>67:49:39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page Viewed</td>
<td>0:00:58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>196,637,941</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>233,964,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Droid: Is this the Smartphone Consumers are Looking For?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-droid-is-this-the-smartphone-consumers-are-looking-for/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-droid-is-this-the-smartphone-consumers-are-looking-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Rocha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=17803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The launch of the Droid by Motorola--which runs Google's Android 2.0 operating system--is the latest smartphone to be tagged "a game changer," and "the iPhone killer."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Jerry Rocha, Sr. Director, Online Division</em></strong></p>
<p>The launch of the Droid by Motorola&#8211;which runs Google&#8217;s Android 2.0 operating system&#8211;is the latest smartphone to be tagged &#8220;game changing iPhone killer.&#8221;  We prefer to view it as simply a quality choice in a growing line of smartphones rather than something that will stifle the competition.  With only 10,000 applications available in the Android market and more than 100,000 available for the iPhone, the Droid&#8211;or any Android phone&#8211;won&#8217;t be killing the iPhone anytime soon. What the Droid <em>will </em>do is advance the use and adoption of web content to a connected device. Android&#8217;s integration with popular and widespread Google applications such as Gmail, Google Calendar and Google Voice is a big help as is its ability to run multiple applications (up to six on the Droid). Most users do this on their computers so being able to listen to music while browsing the web and sending email makes a multi-tasking smartphone an appealing option.</p>
<p><strong>The Competition to The Competition</strong></p>
<p>The mobile marketplace is not just a faceoff between the iPhone and Droid; over the next few months, there are at least six new devices on deck that will have large screens like the Droid, keyboards (the Droid has both a virtual and physical keyboard), and an ever-increasing number of applications.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s data from Q3 2009 suggests that if you buy an Android phone, you&#8217;ll likely use more of the data features more often than if using any other smartphone.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/smartphone_compare.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17808" title="smartphone_compare" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/smartphone_compare.png" alt="smartphone_compare" width="575" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Also, for the first time in Q3, Nielsen saw more users accessing the Internet on smartphone than that of feature phone users. If this trend continues, we’ll see more than 80% of the devices accessing the Internet being these advanced phones.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/smartphone_v_featurephone.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17811" title="smartphone_v_featurephone" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/smartphone_v_featurephone.png" alt="smartphone_v_featurephone" width="575" height="283" /></a></p>
<h3>The Mobile Universe is Expanding</h3>
<p>In Q3 2009, historically the slowest phone sales quarter, more than 25% of all phones sold were smartphones. Expect Q4 to have more than 40% of the new phones sold be smart devices. This is important to watch as smartphones are on track to be the majority of phones in the U.S. by 2011. Projecting Nielsen data out through 2010, we see smartphones crossing 50% of the market by the middle of 2011, roughly equal to 150 million users. This shift could happen much faster with the right conditions such as continued competitive price points on devices, lower &#8220;all you can eat&#8221; data packages and the increasing consumer need to be connected anytime, anywhere.</p>
<p>By mid-2011, the U.S. should be just over 300 million mobile subscribers. If we assume that we will have over 150 millions uses of smartphones (based on our projections) and that 80% of these users will access the Internet and 60% will access video (given the current data trend these assumptions may actually be low), this means that over 120 million mobile users will be on the Internet and 90 million will be watching video. What we have typically called the “third screen” is quickly becoming an extension of the first and second screens (TV and desktop viewing) especially in some key demographics. Note how Hispanics and African-Americans over-index on Mobile Video and Internet Usage.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mobile_demographics.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17813" title="mobile_demographics" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mobile_demographics.png" alt="mobile_demographics" width="575" height="416" /></a></p>
<p>Overall, we see mobile media growth accelerating over the next year with more users paying for video and premium content. Remember,  the mobile phone is the one media device that is always within reach. The trend in the U.S. is more interaction, more consumption, and more connected devices. While not a competition killer, the Droid is the next logical step in a market with a wide array of rich media devices. As that trend continues, the battle for better smartphones with better access to content will wind up seeing the consumer as the clear winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-droid-is-this-the-smartphone-consumers-are-looking-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Web Brands and Parent Companies for September 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-september-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-september-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Average Internet Usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported September 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported September 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.<br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Parent Companies/Divisions for September 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Parent</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>153,928</td>
<td>2:36:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>136,639</td>
<td>2:08:38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>134,688</td>
<td>3:08:28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>105,449</td>
<td>5:24:38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL LLC</td>
<td>89,302</td>
<td>2:40:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>News Corp. Online</td>
<td>86,290</td>
<td>1:30:36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>InterActiveCorp</td>
<td>70,900</td>
<td>0:18:33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>65,285</td>
<td>1:24:37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikimedia Foundation</td>
<td>61,321</td>
<td>0:17:29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>60,397</td>
<td>0:22:44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Example:  The data indicates that 60.4 million home and work Internet users visited at least one of the Amazon-owned sites or launched an Amazon-owned application during the month, and each person spent, on average, a total of 22 minutes and 44 seconds at one or more of their sites or applications.</p>
<p>The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.<span id="_marker"><br />
</span><br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Web Brands for September 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>144,049</td>
<td>1:53:10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>133,425</td>
<td>3:08:49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>110,778</td>
<td>2:01:03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>105,449</td>
<td>5:24:38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>92,812</td>
<td>1:12:51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>92,122</td>
<td>0:45:02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>89,302</td>
<td>2:40:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>66,756</td>
<td>1:45:50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>61,080</td>
<td>0:17:26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>58,940</td>
<td>1:17:55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home &amp; Work, Month of September 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metrics</th>
<th> Sep-09</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Pages per Person</td>
<td>2,645</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>68:00:58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page Viewed</td>
<td>0:00:57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>194,266,992</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>233,878,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-september-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Long Tail of the Net &#8211; Just How Important is it?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Buchwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Buchwalter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &#38; Analytics
There has been much talk in the Internet industry around the importance of the &#8220;long tail&#8221; (niche content and service-oriented sites) and how consumers gravitate to it.  The central concept is that people tend to be most engaged in content that is core to their specific interests, rather than more generalized content.
Looking at our newly expanded panel that includes more than 30,000 sites, we have found that short tail sites (those with a greater than 1 percent reach) remain the most engaging ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Charles Buchwalter, Senior Vice President, Research &amp; Analytics</strong></em><br />
There has been much talk in the Internet industry around the importance of the &#8220;long tail&#8221; (niche content and service-oriented sites) and how consumers gravitate to it.  The central concept is that people tend to be most engaged in content that is core to their specific interests, rather than more generalized content.</p>
<p>Looking at our newly expanded panel that includes more than 30,000 sites, we have found that short tail sites (those with a greater than 1 percent reach) remain the most engaging brands online.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1178" title="jongibs_longtail1_0713091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jongibs_longtail1_0713091.bmp" alt="jongibs_longtail1_0713091" /></p>
<p>It seems that the differentiation between the long tail and short tail is important. Long tail sites tend to have lower engagement levels than short tail sites. <span id="more-14346"></span></p>
<p>However, it would be reasonable to ask: &#8220;well, since not all short tail sites are the same, what happens to those numbers if you remove portals and large social networks?&#8221; The answer is interesting. When we look at the data in relation to the highest traffic sites on the Web (e.g., Google, Yahoo!, YouTube, MySpace, Wikipedia, Apple and Facebook) here&#8217;s what happens:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1177" title="jongibs_longtail2_0713091" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jongibs_longtail2_0713091.bmp" alt="jongibs_longtail2_0713091" /></p>
<p>Long tail sites tend to have lower engagement levels than short tail sites; however, the largest jump isn&#8217;t between long tail and short tail, it is really between everyone and the top 10 sites.</p>
<p>What does this amount to? As much as anyone thinks the future is in the long tail, it&#8217;s just not the case-at least not yet. In fact, consumers feel more comfortable on large, mass media sites. We know the Internet is changing. We know there are more blogs, boards, tweets and social networks than ever before. But what&#8217;s also clear is that while the Internet itself is fragmenting (like all other media), people continue to spend their time on the sites that offer them the most options and functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Search Providers for April 2009 (U.S)</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-search-providers-for-april-2009-us/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-search-providers-for-april-2009-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[April 2009 search rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[













 RANK
 Provider
 Searches (000)
 YOY Growth
 % of all Searches



All Search
8,608,488
4.40%
100.00%


1
Google Search
5,510,366
7.80%
64.0%


2
Yahoo! Search
1,406,416
-2.80%
16.3%


3
MSN/Windows Live Search
852,998
7.20%
9.9%


4
AOL Search
321,205
-8.80%
3.7%


5
Ask.com Search
181,617
5.90%
2.1%


6
My Web Search Search
59,110
3.60%
0.70%


7
Comcast Search
45,338
-1.80%
0.50%


8
Yellow Pages Search
37,160
N/A*
0.40%


9
NexTag Search
22,845
3.90%
0.30%


10
Dogpile.com Search
17,010
3.10%
0.20%


Source: Nielsen MegaView Search
* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Provider</th>
<th> Searches (000)</th>
<th> YOY Growth</th>
<th> % of all Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>8,608,488</td>
<td>4.40%</td>
<td>100.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>5,510,366</td>
<td>7.80%</td>
<td>64.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,406,416</td>
<td>-2.80%</td>
<td>16.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live Search</td>
<td>852,998</td>
<td>7.20%</td>
<td>9.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>321,205</td>
<td>-8.80%</td>
<td>3.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>181,617</td>
<td>5.90%</td>
<td>2.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search Search</td>
<td>59,110</td>
<td>3.60%</td>
<td>0.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>45,338</td>
<td>-1.80%</td>
<td>0.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>37,160</td>
<td>N/A*</td>
<td>0.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>22,845</td>
<td>3.90%</td>
<td>0.30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Dogpile.com Search</td>
<td>17,010</td>
<td>3.10%</td>
<td>0.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: Nielsen MegaView Search<br />
* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-10-search-providers-for-april-2009-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Online Companies And Brands, Plus Internet Usage For March &#8216;09</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-online-companies-and-brands-plus-internet-usage-for-march-09/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-online-companies-and-brands-plus-internet-usage-for-march-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leading web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Onlein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=10587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company released March 2009 U.S. data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage. Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! led the way for parent companies online.


The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company released March 2009 U.S. data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage. Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! led the way for parent companies online.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10592" title="top_march_sites" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/top_march_sites.png" alt="" width="525" height="223" /></p>
<p><span id="more-10587"></span><br />
The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10594" title="web_brands_march" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/web_brands_march.png" alt="" width="525" height="235" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10596" title="web_march_usage" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/web_march_usage.png" alt="" width="400" height="186" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-online-companies-and-brands-plus-internet-usage-for-march-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Online Search Providers: February 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-february-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-february-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen Online, approximately 8.5 billion Web searches were conducted during February 2009, a 10% percent jump from January 2008.
Google searches accounted for 63.5 percent of all Web searches with nearly 5.4 billion queries.  Yahoo, MSN, AOL and Ask.com continued to round out the top five.




 RANK
 Provider
 Searches (000)
 YOY Growth
 Share of Searches



All Search
8,494,653
10.10%
100.00%


1
Google Search
5,394,190
19.20%
63.50%


2
Yahoo! Search
1,415,354
4.00%
16.70%


3
MSN/Windows Live Search
881,050
2.40%
10.40%


4
AOL Search
320,098
-19.90%
3.80%


5
Ask.com Search
162,226
-16.90%
1.90%


6
My Web Search
55,772
-21.60%
0.70%


7
Comcast Search
42,895
1.30%
0.50%


8
Yellow Pages Search
37,636
N/A*
0.40%


9
AT&#38;T Worldnet Search
17,371
-27.60%
0.20%


10
Dogpile.com Search
15,880
-28.90%
0.20%


Source: Nielsen Online, MegaView Search




* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Nielsen Online, approximately 8.5 billion Web searches were conducted during February 2009, a 10% percent jump from January 2008.</p>
<p>Google searches accounted for 63.5 percent of all Web searches with nearly 5.4 billion queries.  Yahoo, MSN, AOL and Ask.com continued to round out the top five.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Provider</th>
<th> Searches (000)</th>
<th> YOY Growth</th>
<th> Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>8,494,653</td>
<td>10.10%</td>
<td>100.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>5,394,190</td>
<td>19.20%</td>
<td>63.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,415,354</td>
<td>4.00%</td>
<td>16.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live Search</td>
<td>881,050</td>
<td>2.40%</td>
<td>10.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>320,098</td>
<td>-19.90%</td>
<td>3.80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>162,226</td>
<td>-16.90%</td>
<td>1.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search</td>
<td>55,772</td>
<td>-21.60%</td>
<td>0.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>42,895</td>
<td>1.30%</td>
<td>0.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>37,636</td>
<td>N/A*</td>
<td>0.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>AT&amp;T Worldnet Search</td>
<td>17,371</td>
<td>-27.60%</td>
<td>0.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Dogpile.com Search</td>
<td>15,880</td>
<td>-28.90%</td>
<td>0.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: Nielsen Online, MegaView Search</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --><br />
* A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-february-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Traffic To Top 10 Online Newspapers Grows 16 Percent In December</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/web-traffic-to-top-10-online-newspapers-grows-16-percent-in-december/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/web-traffic-to-top-10-online-newspapers-grows-16-percent-in-december/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online news outlets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USATODAY.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washingtonpost.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While newspapers across the country face a declining number of subscribers, traffic to the top 10 online newspapers grew 16 percent in December 2008 versus a year ago, according to new research from Nielsen Online.
NYTimes.com continued to be the number one online newspaper, with 18.2 million unique visitors.  USATODAY.com and washingotnpost.com took maintained the number two and three ranks, respectively. 



Site
Dec-07 (000)
Dec-08 (000)
% Change


Top 10 Online Newspapers
34,602
40,093
16


NYTimes.com
17,177
18,187
6


USATODAY.com
9,939
11,420
15


washingtonpost.com
8,478
9,470
12


LA Times
4,607
7,963
73


Wall Street Journal Online
5,409
7,235
34


Daily News Online Edition
2,956
5,883
99


Chicago Tribune
3,891
5,235
35


New York Post
2,851
4,557
60


Boston.com
4,364
4,086
-6


SFGate.com/SF Chronicle
2,785
3,503
26


Source: Nielsen Online (January 26, 2009)



&#8220;December was an extremely active month in terms ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-7609 alignleft" title="newspaper" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="118" height="78" /></a>While newspapers across the country face a declining number of subscribers, traffic to the top 10 online newspapers grew 16 percent in December 2008 versus a year ago, according to new research from Nielsen Online.<br />
NYTimes.com continued to be the number one online newspaper, with 18.2 million unique visitors.  USATODAY.com and washingotnpost.com took maintained the number two and three ranks, respectively. </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Site</th>
<th>Dec-07 (000)</th>
<th>Dec-08 (000)</th>
<th>% Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Top 10 Online Newspapers</td>
<td>34,602</td>
<td>40,093</td>
<td>16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NYTimes.com</td>
<td>17,177</td>
<td>18,187</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">USATODAY.com</td>
<td>9,939</td>
<td>11,420</td>
<td>15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">washingtonpost.com</td>
<td>8,478</td>
<td>9,470</td>
<td>12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">LA Times</td>
<td>4,607</td>
<td>7,963</td>
<td>73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Wall Street Journal Online</td>
<td>5,409</td>
<td>7,235</td>
<td>34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Daily News Online Edition</td>
<td>2,956</td>
<td>5,883</td>
<td>99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Chicago Tribune</td>
<td>3,891</td>
<td>5,235</td>
<td>35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">New York Post</td>
<td>2,851</td>
<td>4,557</td>
<td>60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Boston.com</td>
<td>4,364</td>
<td>4,086</td>
<td>-6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">SFGate.com/SF Chronicle</td>
<td>2,785</td>
<td>3,503</td>
<td>26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen Online (January 26, 2009)</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#8220;December was an extremely active month in terms of news.  The economic downturn, and its effects on the holidays and coverage of the incoming presidential administration, among other stories, all helped drive this impressive growth,&#8221; said Chuck Schilling, research director, agency &amp; media for Nielsen Online.</p>
<p>Nielsen Online also reported data regarding the top 10 parent companies and top 10 web brands for December.  That information and the full release can be viewed <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pr_090127.pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/web-traffic-to-top-10-online-newspapers-grows-16-percent-in-december/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Online Search Providers: November 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-november-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-november-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen Online, there were almost 8.1 billion Web searches conducted during November 2008 &#8212; up 9.6% over the same month last year.
Google searches accounted for more than 64% of all Web searches, with almost 5.2 billion queries.  Yahoo!, MSN, AOL, and Ask.com rounded out the top five.



Rank
(by # of
searches)
Provider
Searches
(in 000&#8217;s)
% Growth:
Year Over Year
% of Searches


 
All Searches
8,075,564
9.6%
100%


1
Google Search
5,177,158
21.7%
64.1%


2
Yahoo! Search
1,299,306
-1.4%
16.1%


3
MSN/Windows Live Search
733,460
-16.7%
9.1%


4
AOL Search
344,465
3.6%
4.3%


5
Ask.com Search
184,059
-6.0%
2.3%


6
My Web Search
71,113
-18.3%
0.9%


7
Comcast Search
40,645
3.5%
0.5%


8
AT&#38;T Worldnet Search
25,351
-13.3%
0.3%


9
NexTag Search
22,308
-19.5%
0.3%


10
Dogpile.com Search
17,121
-6.5%
0.2%


Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2008).



View the full press release.
Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings on CNET.com and Silicon.com, as well as in Mediaweek and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Nielsen Online, there were almost 8.1 billion Web searches conducted during November 2008 &#8212; up 9.6% over the same month last year.</p>
<p>Google searches accounted for more than 64% of all Web searches, with almost 5.2 billion queries.  Yahoo!, MSN, AOL, and Ask.com rounded out the top five.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by # of<br />
searches)</th>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Searches<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>% Growth:<br />
Year Over Year</th>
<th>% of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #a4d6f4;"> </td>
<td style="background-color: #a4d6f4;">All Searches</td>
<td style="background-color: #a4d6f4;">8,075,564</td>
<td style="background-color: #a4d6f4;">9.6%</td>
<td style="background-color: #a4d6f4;">100%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>5,177,158</td>
<td>21.7%</td>
<td>64.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,299,306</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>16.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live Search</td>
<td>733,460</td>
<td>-16.7%</td>
<td>9.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>344,465</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>184,059</td>
<td>-6.0%</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search</td>
<td>71,113</td>
<td>-18.3%</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>40,645</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>AT&amp;T Worldnet Search</td>
<td>25,351</td>
<td>-13.3%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>22,308</td>
<td>-19.5%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Dogpile.com Search</td>
<td>17,121</td>
<td>-6.5%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2008).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pr_090105.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings on <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-19167_1-10135067-100.html" target="_blank">CNET.com</a> and <a href="http://networks.silicon.com/webwatch/0,39024667,39372261,00.htm" target="_blank">Silicon.com</a>, as well as in <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/esearch/e3i27e6523c216f71f790af2db812ff9da1" target="_blank">Mediaweek</a> and <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=97776" target="_blank">Media Post</a>.</p>
<p>Review <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/google-tops-search-engines-for-september/" target="_blank">September</a> and <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/nearly-78-billion-web-searches-in-us-for-october/" target="_blank">October</a> 2008 search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-november-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Web Brands Among U.S. Internet Users: Nov. 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-nov-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-nov-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Interactive Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google was the top-ranked Web brand in November, drawing more than 127 million unique visitors during the month, Nielsen Online reported Tuesday.  Yahoo! and MSN/Windows Live rounded out the top three, with unique audiences of just over 117 million and 104 million visitors, respectively.



Rank
Brand
Unique Audience
(in 000s)
Time Per Person
(hh:mm:ss)


1
Google
127,656
1:23:40


2
Yahoo!
117,656
3:17:36


3
MSN/Windows Live
104,090
2:13:19


4
Microsoft
95,543
0:45:44


5
AOL Media Network
86,308
3:43:45


6
YouTube
81,882
1:01:33


7
Fox Interactive Media
69,838
1:39:31


8
Wikipedia
58,335
0:18:39


9
Amazon
57,682
0:25:33


10
eBay
55,438
1:43:41


Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2008).



View the full press release.
View the top U.S. Web brands for September and October 2008.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google was the top-ranked Web brand in November, drawing more than 127 million unique visitors during the month, Nielsen Online reported Tuesday.  Yahoo! and MSN/Windows Live rounded out the top three, with unique audiences of just over 117 million and 104 million visitors, respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Unique Audience<br />
(in 000s)</th>
<th>Time Per Person<br />
(hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>127,656</td>
<td>1:23:40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>117,656</td>
<td>3:17:36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live</td>
<td>104,090</td>
<td>2:13:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>95,543</td>
<td>0:45:44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>86,308</td>
<td>3:43:45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>81,882</td>
<td>1:01:33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>69,838</td>
<td>1:39:31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>58,335</td>
<td>0:18:39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>57,682</td>
<td>0:25:33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>55,438</td>
<td>1:43:41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/november-2008-data-tables_final.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p><strong>View the top U.S. Web brands for </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-sept-2008/" target="_blank"><strong>September</strong></a><strong> and </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-oct-2008/" target="_blank"><strong>October 2008</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-nov-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
