<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In India, Google Leads the Smartphone App Race</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/in-india-google-leads-the-smartphone-app-race/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/in-india-google-leads-the-smartphone-app-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A major contributor to the fast-changing nature of smartphones in India is the explosion of Google&#8217;s Android onto the scene. The tremendous growth of Android since entering India last year has it taking the leadership position in terms of shipments last quarter. A Nielsen Informate panel found smartphone users in India spending more than 40 percent of total active time on their smartphones on data-centric activities. A full 25 percent of users&#8217; time with apps is spent on those developed by Google, with the Android Market, YouTube and Gmail leading ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major contributor to the fast-changing nature of smartphones in India is the explosion of Google&#8217;s Android onto the scene. The tremendous growth of Android since entering India last year has it taking the leadership position in terms of shipments last quarter. A Nielsen Informate panel found smartphone users in India spending more than 40 percent of total active time on their smartphones on data-centric activities. A full 25 percent of users&#8217; time with apps is spent on those developed by Google, with the Android Market, YouTube and Gmail leading the way.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-share-of-apps.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30790" title="in-share-of-apps" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-share-of-apps.png" alt="in-share-of-apps" width="570" height="265" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Google has the #1 app in terms of reach for 5 out of top 7 genres, while Facebook dominates social networking</strong></p>
<p>Google properties occupy the top spot in five of the top seven genres, by reach. Facebook and Nimbuzz lead the social networking and chat genres respectively.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-genre.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30791" title="in-apps-genre" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-genre.png" alt="in-apps-genre" width="570" height="240" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Google does well in time spent with the top app categories</strong><br />
Google apps dominate in terms of time spent for streaming video, GPS, email, and search. 94% of time spent on streaming video goes to YouTube, while 86% of time spent on GPS is with Google. However, when it comes to social networking and chat applications, Google struggles to obtain more than a few percentage points of time spent.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-data-apps.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30792" title="in-data-apps" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-data-apps.png" alt="in-data-apps" width="570" height="351" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Google apps dominate across age groups</strong><br />
Google Apps have a fairly uniform usage across age groups indicating the success Google has had in establishing itself with all mobile users.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-age.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30793" title="in-apps-age" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-age.png" alt="in-apps-age" width="570" height="290" /></a></p>
<p><span class="table_meta"><strong>About Nielsen Informate Mobile Insights</strong><br />
Nielsen Informate Mobile Insights leverages innovative smartphone metering technology to provide insights into evolving consumption patterns of mobile device users. Based on accurate, real-time usage data, we help clients understand consumer behavior and develop product and marketing strategies. Nielsen Informate Mobile Insights maintains opt-in smartphone panels to generate syndicated reports, in addition to building custom panels and conducting custom surveys for clients. Our insights aid decision makers across various segments like operators, OEMs, publishers, advertisers, content creators and aggregators and application developers.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/in-india-google-leads-the-smartphone-app-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 2011 &#8211; Top U.S. Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During November 2011, Google was the most-visited Web brand with 174.3 million unique U.S. visitors. The list of Top Brands remained the same as the month before, with the Amazon overtaking Wikipedia as the 8th ranked site by total audience in November, reflecting greater consumer activity during the busy holiday shopping season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During November 2011, Google was the most-visited Web brand with 174.3 million unique U.S. visitors. The list of Top Brands remained the same as the month before, with the Amazon overtaking Wikipedia as the 8th ranked site by total audience in November, reflecting greater consumer activity during the busy holiday shopping season.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Web Brands for November 2011 (U.S., Total)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Total Internet Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>174,314</td>
<td>1:44:51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>156,247</td>
<td>6:59:20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>145,406</td>
<td>2:06:30*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>130,896</td>
<td>1:32:49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>127,004</td>
<td>1:36:37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>98,121</td>
<td>0:44:31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>87,005</td>
<td>2:56:06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>84,233</td>
<td>0:42:14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>79,688</td>
<td>0:18:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>74,793</td>
<td>1:07:03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Read as: During November 2011, 174.3 million unique U.S. people visited Google’s websites.</p>
<p>Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>* - Yahoo! duration data shows an artificial decrease for May – November 2011 and does not reflect the activity on these sites.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>Overall 213 million Americans were active online in November 2011, and Nielsen estimated that over 274 million Americans were connected to the Internet.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Average U.S. Internet Usage for November 2011</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metrics</th>
<th>Total</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="200">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>2911</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:01:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Online Time per Person</td>
<td>29:02:30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People Who Went Online</td>
<td>213,285,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People who had Internet access</td>
<td>274,404,664</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Read as: 213 million Americans were active online during November 2011.</p>
<p>Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen&#8217;s Tops of 2011: Digital</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-tops-of-2011-digital/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-tops-of-2011-digital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen looks at the top online destinations and mobile platforms of 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As 2011 comes to a close, Nielsen reviewed the top online destinations, social media sites, and smartphone devices. Google was the most-visited U.S. Web brand, while Facebook held its lead among social networks and blogs.  Smartphones were popular in 2011, making up the majority of new phone purchases with Apple as the top smartphone manufacturer and Android as the leading OS.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 U.S. Web Brands in 2011</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Web Brand</th>
<th>Avg # of Unique Visitors (000)<br />
per month</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>153,441</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>137,644</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>130,121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>115,890</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>106,692</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>83,691</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>74,633</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>62,097</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>61,608</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Ask Search Network</td>
<td>60,552</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January &#8211; October 2011, Home and Work Computers. Ranked on average monthly unique audience.</p>
<p>Read as: During 2011, 153.4 million U.S. people, on average, visited Google sites from home and work computers</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> Top 10 U.S. Social Networks &amp; Blogs</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Web Brand</th>
<th>Avg # of Unique Visitors (000)<br />
per month</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>137,644</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Blogger</td>
<td>45,712</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Twitter.com</td>
<td>23,574</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>WordPress.com</td>
<td>20,357</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Myspace.com</td>
<td>17,935</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>LinkedIn</td>
<td>17,020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Tumblr</td>
<td>10,879</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Google+</td>
<td>8,207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Yahoo! Pulse</td>
<td>8,063</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Six Apart TypePad</td>
<td>7,793</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January &#8211; October 2011, Home and Work Computers. Ranked on average monthly unique audience.</p>
<p>Read as: During 2011, 137.6 million U.S. people, on average, visited Facebook from home and work computers</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>For more insights and stats about how consumers use social media, please see Nielsen&#8217;s Q3 2011 <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/">Social Media Report</a></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 U.S. Online Destinations for Video</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Web Brand</th>
<th> Avg # of Unique Video Viewers<br />
per month</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>111,152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>VEVO</td>
<td>34,580</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>29,802</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>25,324</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>16,563</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>13,327</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Hulu</td>
<td>13,159</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>The CollegeHumor Network</td>
<td>12,496</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>CNN Digital Network</td>
<td>8,262</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Netflix</td>
<td>7,418</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January &#8211; October 2011, Home and Work Computers. Ranked on average monthly unique viewers.</p>
<p>Read as: During 2011, 111.2 million U.S. people, on average, watched video content on YouTube from home and work computers</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 5 Smartphone Device Manufacturers</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Manufacturer</th>
<th> Market Share</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>HTC</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td><span style="font-size: 10px; line-height: normal;">RIM BlackBerry</span></td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Samsung</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Motorola</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from August &#8211; October 2011.</p>
<p>Read as: 29 percent of mobile phone users who recently purchased a new smartphone bought an Apple device</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>For more smartphone market data and insights about how consumer use their mobile devices, please see Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-the-rise-of-smartphones-apps-and-the-mobile-web/">Mobile Media Report</a> for 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-tops-of-2011-digital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App-Happy with Android: The Most Popular Android Apps by Age</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/app-happy-with-android-the-most-popular-android-apps-by-age/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/app-happy-with-android-the-most-popular-android-apps-by-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angry Birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook and apps from Google like Gmail and the Android Market are the most popular smartphone apps among Android owners according to Nielsen’s latest research on smartphone usage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook and apps from Google like Gmail and the Android Market are the most popular smartphone apps among Android owners 18 years and older in the U.S. according to Nielsen’s latest research on smartphone usage.  To rank mobile apps by active reach, that is, by the percentage of Android owners who used the app within the past 30 days, Nielsen analyzed usage data from its proprietary device meters on the smartphones of the thousands of consumer panelists who agreed to be part of Nielsen’s ongoing Smartphone Analytics research.</p>
<p><strong>Staying Social</strong><br />
Facebook’s popular app is the most active among Android owners 18-24 and 25-34, who both hover at around an 80 percent active reach. Additionally, more than three quarters of users 35-44 used the app recently as well.</p>
<p>Google’s YouTube app gets heavy usage from Android smartphone owners 18 -24: 64 percent have used it in the past 30 days, compared to 56 percent and 51 percent of 25-34 and 35-44 year olds. A preference for media apps with a social dimension (e.g. Words with Friends) among the 18-24 set is also reinforced by their sizable usage of music and video apps (e.g. Pandora) compared to older demographics.</p>
<p><strong>Play Time</strong><br />
Not just for the kids, the ubiquitous game, Angry Birds, appeals more to those 35-44 when compared to other age groups: 35 percent of them have used the app in the last 30 days, while only 22 percent of those 18-24 and 29 percent of 25-34 year-olds launched the game.</p>
<p><strong>Apps and More for Sale</strong><br />
Apart from gaming, the 35-44 segment demonstrates a greater inclination to shop using the Amazon AppStore: 24 percent of them used the app in the last 30 days, while only 14 percent of those 18-24 did the same. Groupon appeals more to those 25-34, not even making the top 20 ranking for those 18-24.  A similar trend was found on Google+: active reach was higher for those 25 and older when compared to the 18-24 demographic.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/android-apps-by-age.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30328" title="android-apps-by-age" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/android-apps-by-age.png" alt="android-apps-by-age" width="575" height="504" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/app-happy-with-android-the-most-popular-android-apps-by-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2011 &#8211; Top US Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/september-2011-top-us-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/september-2011-top-us-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Internet Audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During September 2011 Google was the most visited web brand, with 170 million unique U.S. visitors, and the list of Top Brands remained largely the same as the month before with the Ask Search Network overtaking Apple as the 10th ranked brand in terms of total audience.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During September 2011 Google was the most visited web brand, with 170 million unique U.S. visitors, and the list of Top Brands remained largely the same as the month before with the Ask Search Network overtaking Apple as the 10th ranked brand in terms of total audience.  Visitors to Wikipedia spent 4.6 percent more time on average on the site during September 2011, and visitors to the Ask Search Network also increased their average time spent by 9.8 percent.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Web Brands for September 2011 (U.S., Total)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Total Internet Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>170,679</td>
<td>1:43:50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>155,061</td>
<td>7:24:26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>145,814</td>
<td>2:06:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>128,835</td>
<td>1:33:43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>123,964</td>
<td>1:30:10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>93,765</td>
<td>0:42:13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>87,820</td>
<td>2:43:57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>77,608</td>
<td>0:18:53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>71,980</td>
<td>0:29:12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Ask Search Network</td>
<td>71,590</td>
<td>0:12:27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Read as: During September 2011, 170.7 million unique U.S. people visited Google’s websites.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall 210 million Americans were active on the Internet in September 2011, and Nielsen estimated that Internet access continued to grow, with over 275 million Americans connected as of September 2011.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Average U.S. Internet Usage for September 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Metrics</th>
<th>Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>2905</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:01:00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Online Time per Person</td>
<td>28:20:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People Who Went Online</td>
<td>210,667,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People who had Internet access</td>
<td>275,687,038</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Read as: 210 million Americans were active online during September 2011.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/september-2011-top-us-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>August 2011 &#8211; Top US Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/august-2011-top-us-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/august-2011-top-us-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Internet Audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google was the most visited website during August 2011 with 176 million unique US visitors. The Top Sites among U.S. web users remained largely the same as the month before, with Amazon increasing its rank to become the 9th most visited site during August 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google was the most visited website during August 2011 with 176 million unique U.S. visitors. The Top Sites among U.S. web users remained largely the same as the month before, with Amazon increasing its rank to become the 9th most visited site during August 2011.</p>
<p>While all sites in the Top 10 saw an increase in unique U.S. visitors during the month, Amazon had the largest increase (5.9%) among the top sites.  Visitors to Facebook’s website spent the most time on average, logging over 7 hours 45 minutes using the social network over the course of the month. AOL also increased the amount of time spent by average visitors on their site by over 25% during August.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Web Brand for August 2011 (U.S., Total)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Total Internet Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>176,235</td>
<td>1:47:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>163,163</td>
<td>7:45:49*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>149,072</td>
<td>2:12:08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>134,410</td>
<td>1:43:45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>127,983</td>
<td>1:41:27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>98,168</td>
<td>0:45:05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>92,096</td>
<td>2:52:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>79,000</td>
<td>0:18:03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>74,532</td>
<td>0:30:56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>74,526</td>
<td>1:06:15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Read as: During August 2011, 176.2 million unique U.S. people visited Google’s websites.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall 215 million Americans were active on the Internet in August 2011, an increase of 1.2% compared to the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/july-2011-top-us-web-brands/">previous month</a>. On average Americans spent over 30 hours online during August and visited 99 unique domains. Nielsen estimates 275 million Americans had access to the Internet during August 2011.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Average U.S. Internet Usage for August 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Metrics</th>
<th>Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>3,123*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:0:56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Online Time per Person</td>
<td>30:04:10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People Who Went Online</td>
<td>215,848,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People who had Internet access</td>
<td>275,602,135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Read as: 215 million Americans were active online during August 2011, from Total Internet Audience using all sources in the US.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>* – Due to a change in the type of call used behind Facebook’s AJAX  interface, Nielsen NetView data for Facebook duration was underreported for June and July, impacting overall web use figures for those months. Therefore, Time Spent and Page Views per Person for August should not be trended against July 2011 data.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/august-2011-top-us-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nearly 75% of Consumers Remember an Ad When Viewed Across Media Platforms</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nearly-75-of-consumers-remember-an-ad-when-viewed-across-media-platforms/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nearly-75-of-consumers-remember-an-ad-when-viewed-across-media-platforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross platform audience behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research from Nielsen, commissioned by Google, shows that advertising on multiple platforms substantially increases consumers’ ability to remember an ad campaign compared to when the ad is viewed on TV alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New research from Nielsen, commissioned by Google, shows that advertising on multiple platforms substantially increases consumers’ ability to remember an ad campaign compared to when the ad is viewed on TV alone.</p>
<p>In a media lab study conducted by Nielsen, participants viewed related content across a TV, computer, smartphone and tablet. A 15-second video ad promoting a premium sports sedan was shown to different groups with some people seeing no ads, and others seeing the ad on different combinations of screens.</p>
<p>In the group that was exposed to TV ads alone, 50 percent of people correctly attributed the ad to the correct auto brand. For groups that saw the ad across all screens – TV, computer, smartphone and tablet – the ability to remember the brand jumped dramatically to nearly three-in-four (74%).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_awareness_Ad.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29254" title="google ad awareness" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_awareness_Ad.gif" alt="google ad awareness" width="394" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>Similarly, only 22 percent of the group exposed to just the TV ad was able to correctly remember that the ad was for a 4-door sedan versus 39 percent of the group that saw the ad across all screens.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_engagement_Ad.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29255" title="Google_engagement_Ad" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_engagement_Ad.gif" alt="Google_engagement_Ad" width="394" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>While research shows that TV remains the strongest driver of awareness, the study demonstrates that the addition of online and mobile campaigns returns the highest overall brand impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nearly-75-of-consumers-remember-an-ad-when-viewed-across-media-platforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July 2011 &#8211; Top US Web brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/july-2011-top-us-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/july-2011-top-us-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audience measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen NetView]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Internet Audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[July 2011 marks the first month of Nielsen’s new “Total Internet Audience” metric, which incorporates hybrid audience measurement data to provide a holistic view of online audience activity. Google was the most visited website in the U.S. in July with 172 million unique US visitors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 2011 marks the first month of Nielsen’s new “Total Internet Audience” metric, which incorporates <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/measurement/online-measurement.html">hybrid audience measurement</a> data to provide a holistic view of online audience activity.  Google was the most visited website in the U.S. in July with 172 million unique US visitors. During July 2011, 7 of the Top 10 web brands retained the same rank, with Wikipedia and Apple switching places compared to previous months.  Amazon had 70.4 million unique US visitors during the month, making their site the 10th ranked during the month.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Web Brand for July 2011 (US, Total)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Total Internet Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>172,533</td>
<td>1:29:40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>158,913</td>
<td>5:18:40*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>148,590</td>
<td>2:14:25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>131,061</td>
<td>1:38:57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>125,978</td>
<td>1:39:02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>94,680</td>
<td>0:45:30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>90,181</td>
<td>2:17:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>74,655</td>
<td>0:18:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>71,153</td>
<td>1:03:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>70,388</td>
<td>0:29:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Read as: During July 2011, 172.5 million unique U.S. people visited Google’s websites.<br />
Source: Nielsen<br />
* &#8211; Due to a change in the type of call used behind Facebook&#8217;s AJAX  interface, Nielsen NetView data for Facebook duration will be underreported for June and July.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Hybrid data extends beyond Home and Work PCs, and as a result of these measurement enhancements and the additional sources measured, metrics including Unique Audience, which Nielsen uses to rank the top web brands, witnessed changes in data for July. Therefore July data can not be trended, but moving forward Total Internet Audience data can be trended with previous months’ Total Internet Audience data.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/measurement/online-measurement.html">Hybrid measurement</a> combines Nielsen’s online panel, a people-based representative sample employed to measure consumer&#8217;s Internet behavior using Home and Work computers, with tag-based data from websites to account for Internet use from any source.  Thanks to this hybrid approach, Nielsen’s Total Internet Audience metric includes web browsing activity from all devices, including mobile devices, tablets, secondary PCs and access points outside of home and work locations. </p>
<p>Overall 213 million Americans were active on the Internet in July 2011 from all sources included in hybrid measurement. Internet access through home and work PCs continued to grow to 249 million individuals in the U.S. during July 2011.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Average U.S. Internet Usage for July 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Metrics</th>
<th>Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>2,572</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:01:06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Online Time per Person</td>
<td>27:14:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People Who Went Online</td>
<td>213,253,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People who had Internet access</td>
<td>275,465,750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Read as: 213 million Americans were active online during July 2011, from Total Internet Audience using all sources in the US.</p>
<p>Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/july-2011-top-us-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2011: Top U.S. Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/may-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/may-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During May 2011 Google was the most visited website in the U.S. with 155 million unique visitors from home and work computers. The most visited sites among U.S. web users remained largely the same as the month before, while Apple switched positions with Wikipedia to become the 8th most visited site.	
Overall web activity increased slightly in May, and among the Top 10 sites Apple witnessed the highest increase in monthly visitors, with more than 5.7 percent more uniques during May. Facebook also increased unique U.S. visitors by 4.7 percent compared ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During May 2011 Google was the most visited website in the U.S. with 155 million unique visitors from home and work computers. The most visited sites among U.S. web users remained largely the same as the month before, while Apple switched positions with Wikipedia to become the 8th most visited site.	</p>
<p>Overall web activity increased slightly in May, and among the Top 10 sites Apple witnessed the highest increase in monthly visitors, with more than 5.7 percent more uniques during May. Facebook also increased unique U.S. visitors by 4.7 percent compared to the prior month, with average visitors spending slightly less time (-0.8%) on their website in May.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6"> Top 10 Web Brands for May 2011 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
<th> MOM % Change in UA</th>
<th> MOM % Change in Time PP</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>155,007</td>
<td>1:20:25</td>
<td>3.1%</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>140,336</td>
<td>6:20:55</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>133,966</td>
<td>2:08:26</td>
<td>4.4%</td>
<td>4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>117,853</td>
<td>1:20:34</td>
<td>2.0%</td>
<td>-5.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>109,003</td>
<td>1:23:31</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>85,379</td>
<td>0:40:10</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>6.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>74,139</td>
<td>2:34:04</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>63,036</td>
<td>1:07:31</td>
<td>5.7%</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>62,203</td>
<td>0:15:49</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Ask Search Network</td>
<td>59,894</td>
<td>0:10:29</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>5.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company Read as: During May 2011, 155 million unique U.S. people visited Google using PC/laptops from home and work locations.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Over 200 million Americans used their PCs in May 2011, and overall Internet use was up 2.8 percent from April. U.S. consumers also visited more unique sites (2.5%) compared to the previous month, and spent more time online on average (0.8%) in May. Internet access continues to grow during the month, with an estimated 246 million individuals in the U.S. having accessing to the Internet through Home/Work computers in May 2011.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Average U.S. Internet Usage for May 2011 (Home &amp; Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metrics</th>
<th> Current Month</th>
<th> Previous Month</th>
<th>MOM % Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>57</td>
<td>56</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>82</td>
<td>80</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>2,556</td>
<td>2,573</td>
<td>-0.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>56:48:03</td>
<td>56:20:54</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:00:58</td>
<td>0:00:57</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>200,357,619</td>
<td>194,807,520</td>
<td>2.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>246,366,000</td>
<td>244,267,000</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company Read as: During May 2011, 200 million U.S. consumers went online from Home and Work computers.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/may-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2011: Top U.S. Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/april-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/april-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 15:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google was the most visited website in the U.S. during April 2011, with 150 million unique visitors from home and work computers. The most visited sites among U.S. web users remained the same as the month before, but Wikipedia leapfrogged Apple to become the 8th most visited site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google was the most visited website in the U.S. during April 2011, with 150 million unique visitors from home and work computers.  The most visited sites among U.S. web users remained the same as the month before, but Wikipedia leapfrogged Apple to become the 8th most visited site.</p>
<p>While overall web activity decreased slightly in April, YouTube increased U.S. visitors over the prior month, with average visitors spending 2.9 percent more time on the website in April.  Visitors to AOL’s network of sites also spent more time on average, about 5 percent longer during April.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6"> Top 10 Web Brands for April 2011 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
<th> MOM % Change in UA</th>
<th> MOM  % Change in Time PP</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>150,425</td>
<td>1:19:44</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
<td>-2.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>134,059</td>
<td>6:23:47</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
<td>-3.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>128,369</td>
<td>2:15:59</td>
<td>-2.2%</td>
<td>-0.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>115,501</td>
<td>1:17:00</td>
<td>-3.2%</td>
<td>-11.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>106,369</td>
<td>1:20:09</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>82,399</td>
<td>0:37:50</td>
<td>-6.4%</td>
<td>-11.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>72,061</td>
<td>2:33:24</td>
<td>-4.2%</td>
<td>4.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>60,506</td>
<td>0:15:07</td>
<td>-2.1%</td>
<td>-3.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>59,615</td>
<td>1:10:55</td>
<td>-5.4%</td>
<td>-2.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Ask Search Network</td>
<td>57,583</td>
<td>0:09:59</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
<td>-1.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company</p>
<p>Read as: During April 2011, 150.4 million unique U.S. people visited Google using PC/laptops from home and work locations.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>While 194.8 million Americans went online in April, overall Internet use is down 2.4 percent from March.  Not surprisingly, with the shorter month U.S. consumers spent slightly less time online on average (-3.8%) in April, and visited fewer unique sites compared to the month prior. Despite the slight monthly decline in time spent, Nielsen estimates that Internet access at home and work grew to 244 million individuals in the U.S. during April 2011.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Average U.S. Internet Usage for April 2011 (Home &amp; Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metrics</th>
<th> Current Month</th>
<th> Previous Month</th>
<th>MOM % Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>56</td>
<td>58</td>
<td>-3.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>80</td>
<td>84</td>
<td>-4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>2,573</td>
<td>2,644</td>
<td>-2.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>56:20:54</td>
<td>58:36:03</td>
<td>-3.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:00:57</td>
<td>0:00:57</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>194,807,520</td>
<td>199,651,247</td>
<td>-2.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>244,267,000</td>
<td>243,419,000</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</p>
<p>Read as: During April 2011, 194.8 million U.S. consumers went online from Home and Work computers.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/april-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

