<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; flour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/flour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In U.S., A Holiday Baking Divide: North Vs. South</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baking supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chanukah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollar sales index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanukkah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total dry grocery sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total U.S. sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to holiday baking, consumers in the northern U.S. reach for baking supplies &#8212; like readymade frosting, cake decorations, chocolate chips, and food coloring, while southerners prefer to stick to the basics: flour and sugar.
Last November and December, supermarket shoppers in northern markets like Hartford and New Haven, Conn. and Buffalo and Rochester, N.Y. spent almost one-third more, percentage-wise, on baking supplies than average American consumers, Nielsen reports.
During the same period, shoppers in southern markets like Birmingham, Ala. and Memphis dominated sales of flour, spending 106% and 78% more, respectively, than average Americans.
Consumers in Memphis and Birmingham also dominated sales ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cookies_gingerbread_men.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5950" title="cookies_gingerbread_men" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cookies_gingerbread_men-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>When it comes to holiday baking, consumers in the northern U.S. reach for baking supplies &#8212; like readymade frosting, cake decorations, chocolate chips, and food coloring, while southerners prefer to stick to the basics: flour and sugar.</p>
<p>Last November and December, supermarket shoppers in northern markets like Hartford and New Haven, Conn. and Buffalo and Rochester, N.Y. spent almost one-third more, percentage-wise, on baking supplies than average American consumers, Nielsen reports.</p>
<p>During the same period, shoppers in southern markets like Birmingham, Ala. and Memphis dominated sales of flour, spending 106% and 78% more, respectively, than average Americans.</p>
<p>Consumers in Memphis and Birmingham also dominated sales of sugar, spending 57% and 46% more, respectively, than average Americans on that most basic of holiday baking ingredients, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>West Texas, Little Rock, Ark., Nashville, Tenn., and Atlanta were also among the top markets for flour and sugar sales.  Shoppers in these markets spent 30% to 52% more on flour, and 19% to 28% more on sugar than average Americans.</p>
<p><span id="more-5929"></span></p>
<p><strong>Top 10 U.S. Markets: Baking Supplies</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest<br />
index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>HARTFORD/NEW HAVEN</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BUFFALO/ROCHESTER</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>GRAND RAPIDS</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MINNEAPOLIS</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>CLEVELAND</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>SYRACUSE</td>
<td>122</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>MILWAUKEE</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>ST. LOUIS</td>
<td>115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>SEATTLE</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>DETROIT</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>PHILADELPHIA</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>ALBANY</td>
<td>112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>PORTLAND</td>
<td>112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>BOSTON</td>
<td>110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>SAN FRANCISCO</td>
<td>110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SACRAMENTO</td>
<td>109</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank</em></td>
<td><em>SAN ANTONIO</em></td>
<td><em>68</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 U.S. Markets: Flour</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>BIRMINGHAM</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>MEMPHIS</td>
<td>178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>WEST TEXAS</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LITTLE ROCK</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>HOUSTON</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>NASHVILLE</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>SAN ANTONIO</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>ATLANTA</td>
<td>130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>DALLAS</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>PHOENIX</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>PORTLAND</td>
<td>105</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>NEW ORLEANS/MOBILE</td>
<td>103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>KANSAS CITY</td>
<td>103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank </em></td>
<td><em>ORLANDO </em></td>
<td><em>67</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><br />
Top 10 U.S. Markets: Sugar</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Market</th>
<th>Dollar Sales Index<br />
Vs.<br />
Total U.S. Sales</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>MEMPHIS</td>
<td>157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BIRMINGHAM</td>
<td>146</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LITTLE ROCK</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>NASHVILLE</td>
<td>127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>RALEIGH/DURHAM</td>
<td>125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>NEW ORLEANS/MOBILE</td>
<td>124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>CHARLOTTE</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>ATLANTA</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>JACKSONVILLE</td>
<td>120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>WEST TEXAS</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>OKLAHOMA CITY/TULSA</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>LOUISVILLE</td>
<td>114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"><em>Lowest Rank </em></td>
<td><em>OAHU </em></td>
<td><em>68</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (November &#8211; December 2007).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Sales Index&#8221; is based on each market&#8217;s category share of UPC-coded, total dry grocery sales vs. total U.S. sales.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Sales Index reflects a category’s share of total dry grocery sales for a Nielsen market versus the total U.S., using supermarket dollar sales over the most current 52-week period.</p>
<p>The Memphis market’s index of 157 for the Sugar product category, for example, reveals that supermarkets in that particular market sell 57% more sugar, relative to total dry grocery purchases, than the national average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-us-a-holiday-baking-divide-north-vs-south/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Sales Of Canning Supplies, Auto Products, and Tobacco Skew To Rural U.S. Households</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-sales-of-canning-supplies-auto-products-and-tobacco-skew-to-rural-us-households/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-sales-of-canning-supplies-auto-products-and-tobacco-skew-to-rural-us-households/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canning supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbonated beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charcoal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freezing supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rodenticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rural American households spent more than twice as much on canning and freezing supplies, 47% more on automotive products, and 38% more on tobacco and accessories than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.
&#8220;Plain Rural Living&#8221; households &#8212; a Nielsen Spectra lifestyle segment that includes households in small towns and rural areas with the lowest population densities &#8212; account for 21% of all American households.  These households represented 43% of canning/freezing supplies product dollar sales, 31% of automotive product dollar sales, and 29% of tobacco and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rural_deer-crossing-sign.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5351" title="rural_deer-crossing-sign" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rural_deer-crossing-sign-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>Rural American households spent more than twice as much on canning and freezing supplies, 47% more on automotive products, and 38% more on tobacco and accessories than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>&#8220;Plain Rural Living&#8221; households &#8212; a <a href="http://au.nielsen.com/products/Spectra.shtml" target="_blank">Nielsen Spectra</a> lifestyle segment that includes households in small towns and rural areas with the lowest population densities &#8212; account for 21% of all American households.  These households represented 43% of canning/freezing supplies product dollar sales, 31% of automotive product dollar sales, and 29% of tobacco and accessories product dollar sales.</p>
<p>Other categories skewing to rural households include insecticides, pesticides, and rodenticides, as well as fresh meat, flour, sugar/sweeteners, pet food, and carbonated beverages.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Categories:<br />
Rural Households</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Canning, Freezing Supplies</td>
<td>204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Automotive</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Tobacco and Accessories</td>
<td>138</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Insecticides/Pesticides/Rodenticides</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Flour</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Sugar, Sweeteners</td>
<td>126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fresh Meat</td>
<td>124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Pet Food</td>
<td>118</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Carbonated Beverages</td>
<td>115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Charcoal, Logs, Accessories</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: “Dollar Volume Index” is a demographic segment’s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment’s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-5347"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting rural households may want to promote these categories (above) with feature ads, displays, and product assortments. Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen’s Homescan consumer panel, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population. Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-sales-of-canning-supplies-auto-products-and-tobacco-skew-to-rural-us-households/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Vitamins, Medications Sales Skew To Households With Older Members</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-vitamins-medications-sales-skew-to-households-with-older-women/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-vitamins-medications-sales-skew-to-households-with-older-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canned fruit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canning supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freezing supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margarine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitamins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=5181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American households headed by people age 65 and older spent 55% more on vitamins and 45% more on medications and remedies than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.
Households headed by Americans age 65 and older account for 14.4% of all U.S. households.  These households represented 22.3% of vitamins product dollar sales and 20.8% of medications and remedies product dollar sales.
Other categories skewing to households with older people include pain remedies, canned fruit, and coffee, as well as canning/freezing supplies and floral/gardening supplies.



Rank
(by highest index)
Top 10 Categories:
Households ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/older_woman.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5191" title="older_woman" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/older_woman-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>American households headed by people age 65 and older spent 55% more on vitamins and 45% more on medications and remedies than average American households during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>Households headed by Americans age 65 and older account for 14.4% of all U.S. households.  These households represented 22.3% of vitamins product dollar sales and 20.8% of medications and remedies product dollar sales.</p>
<p>Other categories skewing to households with older people include pain remedies, canned fruit, and coffee, as well as canning/freezing supplies and floral/gardening supplies.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Categories:<br />
Households Headed By<br />
Older People (65+)</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Vitamins</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Medications/Remedies</td>
<td>145</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Canned Fruit</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pain Remedies</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Flour</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Canning, Freezing Supplies</td>
<td>128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Coffee</td>
<td>124</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Butter and Margarine</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Floral, Gardening</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Nuts</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: “Dollar Volume Index” is a demographic segment’s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment’s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-5181"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting households headed by older Americans may want to promote these categories (above) with feature ads, displays, and product assortments. Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen’s Homescan consumer panel, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population. Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-vitamins-medications-sales-skew-to-households-with-older-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amid High Commodities Costs, Private Brand Sales Grow</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/amid-high-commodities-costs-in-house-brand-sales-grow/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/amid-high-commodities-costs-in-house-brand-sales-grow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum foil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bargain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bath products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convenience store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cough remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh eggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthy food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-house brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper towels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pasta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private label brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toilet tissue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sales of private brands are up 10% this year — to $80.3 billion in the U.S., Nielsen reported Friday.
Private label dollar sales are being driven primarily by higher commodity pricing &#8212; especially in staple categories that are dominated by private brands. But in recent weeks, private label unit sales have also grown &#8212; a sign that consumers are starting to shift away from established brands in search of better deals.
Among private label food brands, flour (+35%), baby food (+33%), and fresh eggs (+28.2%) showed the largest dollar percent change during ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/consumer_reading_label.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1667" title="consumer_reading_label" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/consumer_reading_label-194x300.jpg" alt="" width="97" height="150" /></a>Sales of private brands are up 10% this year — to $80.3 billion in the U.S., Nielsen reported Friday.</p>
<p>Private label dollar sales are being driven primarily by higher commodity pricing &#8212; especially in staple categories that are dominated by private brands. But in recent weeks, private label unit sales have also grown &#8212; a sign that consumers are starting to shift away from established brands in search of better deals.</p>
<p>Among private label food brands, flour (+35%), baby food (+33%), and fresh eggs (+28.2%) showed the largest dollar percent change during the 52 weeks ending September 6, compared with the prior 52-week period.  Unit sales for those products remained flat during the same period: flour was up 7.2%, fresh eggs dropped 0.9%, and pasta grew by 0.6%.</p>
<p><span id="more-1665"></span></p>
<p>Among non-food private label products, soaps and bath products (+23%), cough and cold remedies (+18%), and hair care products (+18%) showed the largest dollar sales growth during the period.  Paper products, like paper plates, paper towels, and toilet tissue, and aluminum foil were the top-selling non-food private label items. </p>
<p>Across categories, health and wellness-oriented private brands also showed significant growth, according to Nielsen.  Products claiming to be &#8220;natural&#8221; (+11.4%) or &#8220;organic&#8221; (+22.5%), lacking in trans fat or saturated fat (+30.5%), or containing &#8220;multi-grains&#8221; (+16.6%) or &#8220;antioxidants&#8221; (+15.8%) showed the largest dollar sales growth during the period.  Products that claimed to contain no calories (-0.6%) or to be caffeine free (-2.2%) showed the only negative growth. </p>
<p>Among organic private label items, milk, eggs, and produce &#8211; like mini carrots and salad mixes &#8212; were the top-selling items.</p>
<p>View in depth private label sales <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/private-label-sept-2008.pdf">data</a> from Nielsen.</p>
<p>Learn more about private label sales in <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/privatelabelconveniencestore_release_10-2-08.pdf">convenience stores</a>.</p>
<p>Read more about overall private label trends in Nielsen’s <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/etc/content/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/home/insights/consumer_insight.mbc.90208.RelatedLinks.11861.MediaPath.pdf" target="_blank">“Consumer Insight”</a> newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/amid-high-commodities-costs-in-house-brand-sales-grow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
