<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; DMA&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/dmas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>St. Louis Rises to the Top of All-Star, Half Season MLB Viewing</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/st-louis-rises-to-the-top-of-all-star-half-season-mlb-viewing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/st-louis-rises-to-the-top-of-all-star-half-season-mlb-viewing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-star games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Louis Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether it was a cameo appearance by the Commander-In-Chief, the intrigue of perhaps the game&#8217;s best player performing in front of his home crowd, or the simple fact that it came right down to the final out, this year&#8217;s MLB All-Star Game was able to deliver the viewers.
An average of 14.6 million people watched the Midsummer Classic on Tuesday, the largest audience since the infamous 2002 game in Milwaukee that ended in a tie. Ratings in the game&#8217;s host city of St. Louis were especially high with 37% of all TV ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it was a cameo appearance by the Commander-In-Chief, the intrigue of perhaps the game&#8217;s best player performing in front of his home crowd, or the simple fact that it came right down to the final out, this year&#8217;s MLB All-Star Game was able to deliver the viewers.</p>
<p>An average of 14.6 million people watched the Midsummer Classic on Tuesday, the largest audience since the infamous 2002 game in Milwaukee that ended in a tie. Ratings in the game&#8217;s host city of St. Louis were especially high with 37% of all TV households tuning in to the game. It was the largest rating for the game&#8217;s host city since 2001 when 38.4% of Seattle households tuned in as the game was played in the Emerald City.</p>
<p><strong>MLB HALF-SEASON RATINGS REVIEW<br />
</strong>At MLB&#8217;s halfway mark, St. Louis again proved its passion for baseball, ranking behind only Boston as the top-rated professional baseball market. While an average of 9.5 percent of Boston households tuned in to Red Sox games so far this season, the Cardinals drew an impressive 7.4 percent of St. Louis homes.</p>
<p><strong>TOP HALF-SEASON MLB MARKET RATINGS</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Team</th>
<th>1st Half Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Boston Red Sox</td>
<td>9.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>St. Louis Cardinals</td>
<td>7.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Milwaukee Brewers</td>
<td>7.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Minnesota Twins</td>
<td>6.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Philadelphia Phillies</td>
<td>6.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Detroit Tigers</td>
<td>6.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Seattle Mariners</td>
<td>5.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Chicago Cubs</td>
<td>5.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>New York Yankees</td>
<td>4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Cincinnati Reds</td>
<td>4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">source: The Nielsen Company 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>But when looking at percent growth from this time last year, several surprising teams move to the top:</p>
<p>-The Texas Rangers, with one of baseball&#8217;s most exciting lineups, are enjoying a 50% increase in viewership in Dallas, the most year-over-year growth for any MLB team.</p>
<p>-The San Francisco Giants lead the NL wildcard thanks to superior pitching, contributing to 27% higher ratings. When Cy Young winner Tim Lincecum takes the mound, their average rating jumps an additional 9%.</p>
<p>-The Kansas City Royals&#8217; ratings are up 23% despite trailing in the AL Central. The Royals&#8217; ratings increase an additional 8% when Sports Illustrated cover boy Zack Greinke starts.</p>
<p>-The league-leading Los Angeles Dodgers showed no ill effects from the absence of Manny Ramirez, both on the field and on TV, where ratings have increased 20%, creating more ratings distance between the Angels, their in-market rivals.</p>
<p>-The Chicago White Sox are up 12% over 2008, and 27% over 2007, as they continue to close the gap on their cross town rival&#8217;s rating dominance.</p>
<p><strong>BIGGEST GAIN IN MLB MARKET FIRST HALF RATINGS, 2008 VS. 2009</strong></p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Team</th>
<th>2009 1st Half Rating</th>
<th>% Change vs. 2008 1st Half</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Texas Rangers</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>San Francisco Giants</td>
<td>3.3</td>
<td>27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Kansas City Royals</td>
<td>3.7</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Seattle Mariners</td>
<td>5.7</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Washington Nationals</td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Los Angeles Dodgers</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Chicago White Sox</td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Milwaukee Brewers</td>
<td>7.1</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Pittsburgh Pirates</td>
<td>3.3</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Atlanta Braves</td>
<td>3.8</td>
<td>9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/st-louis-rises-to-the-top-of-all-star-half-season-mlb-viewing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPORTS WRAP: Daytona 500 Stays In The &#8216;Green,&#8217; Drives Sponsorships</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-daytona-500-stays-in-the-green-drives-sponsorships/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-daytona-500-stays-in-the-green-drives-sponsorships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daytona 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greensboro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repucom International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=8460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Nielsen looked at the history of Daytona 500 viewership. And with the 2009 Daytona 500 in the rearview mirror, it&#8217;s clear that the some of those trends are still on track.
 
Greenville, SC and Greensboro, NC maintained their spots as the top DMAs for this year&#8217;s race, scoring 21.2 and 19.9 ratings, respectively. Dayton, OH surged to the #3 spot with an 18.0 rating.
 2009 DAYTONA 500: TOP-10 LOCAL DMA RATINGS



RANK
DMA
HH RATING
# OF HOUSEHOLDS (000s)


1
Greenville-Spartanburg-Asheville
21.2
182


2
Greensboro
19.9
136


3
Dayton
18.0
87


4
Indianapolis
17.2
192


5
Knoxville
17.0
93


6
Charlotte
15.6
175


7
Orlando-Daytona Bch-Melbrn
15.4
226


8
Nashville
15.3
155


9
Tampa-St. Pete, Sarasota
15.3
278


10
Jacksonville
15.1
102


source: The Nielsen Company 2009




At its peak (5:48pm ET), the race scored a ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Nielsen looked at the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/sports-wrap-daytona-500-goes-green/">history of Daytona 500 viewership</a>. And with the 2009 Daytona 500 in the rearview mirror, it&#8217;s clear that the some of those trends are still on track.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Greenville, SC and Greensboro, NC maintained their spots as the top DMAs for this year&#8217;s race, scoring 21.2 and 19.9 ratings, respectively. Dayton, OH surged to the #3 spot with an 18.0 rating.</p>
<p style="center;"> <strong>2009 DAYTONA 500: TOP-10 LOCAL DMA RATINGS</strong><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>DMA</th>
<th>HH RATING</th>
<th># OF HOUSEHOLDS (000s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Greenville-Spartanburg-Asheville</td>
<td>21.2</td>
<td>182</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Greensboro</td>
<td>19.9</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Dayton</td>
<td>18.0</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Indianapolis</td>
<td>17.2</td>
<td>192</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Knoxville</td>
<td>17.0</td>
<td>93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Charlotte</td>
<td>15.6</td>
<td>175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Orlando-Daytona Bch-Melbrn</td>
<td>15.4</td>
<td>226</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td>15.3</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Tampa-St. Pete, Sarasota</td>
<td>15.3</td>
<td>278</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Jacksonville</td>
<td>15.1</td>
<td>102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">source: The Nielsen Company 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>At its peak (5:48pm ET), the race scored a 10.5 HH rating, with 18.1 million viewers tuning in. According to Repucom International, which <span style="#000000;"><span style="Arial;">provides exclusive integration of </span>Nielsen<span class="502565920-20022009"><span style="Arial;"> data</span></span> <span class="502565920-20022009"><span style="Arial;">in </span></span>measur</span><span class="502565920-20022009"><span style="Arial;"><span style="#000000;">ing</span> </span></span>brand exposure in sports telecasts, those 18.1 million viewers were exposed to the following brands within the next 30 seconds: AAA, Red Bull, Red Bull Cola, Toyota, Sprint, Sunoco, 3M, Fedex, Goodyear, Taco Bell, EA Sports, Dodge, and Chevrolet.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As a sport tied so directly to sponsorships and the struggling auto industry, NASCAR offered a steady dose of positive exposure for American car companies. According to Repucom, Chevrolet and Ford had the most brand exposures during FOX&#8217;s telecast, combining for 419 exposures and a total of almost 30 minutes. AT&amp;T had the third-most exposure time at almost 14 minutes. More extraordinary, those 14 minutes were an accumulation of just 36 exposures &#8211; meaning AT&amp;T enjoyed an impressive average of 23 seconds per exposure.</p>
<p style="center;"><strong>2009 DAYTONA 500: TOP-10 BRAND EXPOSURES</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>BRAND</th>
<th>EXPOSURES</th>
<th>DURATION (seconds)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Chevrolet</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>909</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Ford</td>
<td>131</td>
<td>864</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>AT&amp;T</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>827</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Aflac</td>
<td>116</td>
<td>811</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>UPS</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>752</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>AMP Energy Drink</td>
<td>109</td>
<td>723</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Sprint</td>
<td>56</td>
<td>699</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Toyota</td>
<td>101</td>
<td>648</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>64</td>
<td>610</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>DeWalt</td>
<td>114</td>
<td>504</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">source: Repucom International 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/sports-wrap-daytona-500-stays-in-the-green-drives-sponsorships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More U.S. Viewers, Households For 2008-09 TV Season</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-viewers-households-up-sligtly-in-2008-09-tv-season/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-viewers-households-up-sligtly-in-2008-09-tv-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Designated Market Areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metered markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older TV viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total U.S. television viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total U.S. TV households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe estimates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The total number of U.S. television households for the 2008-2009 TV season has grown to 114.5 million &#8212; up 1.5% from last year, Nielsen reported Thursday.
U.S. television viewers also increased by 1.3%, to a total of nearly 290 million people (age two and older), with older viewers (age 55+) showing the fastest growth rate (+2.7%).
The new figures, Nielsen&#8217;s TV Universe Estimate for the 2008-2009 TV season, will be reflected in Nielsen&#8217;s national TV ratings as of September 1, 2008. 
Nationally, in comparison to the total number of TV households, the number of Hispanic ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/population_growth_graphic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-791" title="population_growth_graphic" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/population_growth_graphic-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a>The total number of U.S. television households for the 2008-2009 TV season has grown to 114.5 million &#8212; up 1.5% from last year, Nielsen reported Thursday.</p>
<p>U.S. television viewers also increased by 1.3%, to a total of nearly 290 million people (age two and older), with older viewers (age 55+) showing the fastest growth rate (+2.7%).</p>
<p>The new figures, Nielsen&#8217;s TV Universe Estimate for the 2008-2009 TV season, will be reflected in Nielsen&#8217;s national TV ratings as of September 1, 2008. </p>
<p>Nationally, in comparison to the total number of TV households, the number of Hispanic and Asian television households increased by 4.4% and 4.3%, respectively. African American TV households grew by 2.2% during the same time period.</p>
<p>Locally, the top 20 <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/pdf/2008_09_DMA_Ranks.pdf" target="_blank">television markets</a> held onto their 2007-2008 TV season ranks. Movement among lower-ranked markets reflected recent population growth in the Southern and Western United States &#8212; of the 58 markets that moved up in rank, more than half are in the Southeast or Mountain regions.</p>
<p>Local market estimates are projected to January 1, 2009 and will be used in metered market samples as of September 27, 2008.</p>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/press_release34.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/media-agencies-research/e3i1ceb4468ca0772e7143529f7fa375d45" target="_blank">Mediaweek</a> and <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&amp;s=89570&amp;Nid=46646&amp;p=958959" target="_blank">Media Daily News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/us-viewers-households-up-sligtly-in-2008-09-tv-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
