<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; dial test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/dial-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Focus Group: Obama Inches the Health Meter Forward, but Party Lines Still Split</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/focus-group-obama-inches-the-health-meter-forward-but-party-lines-still-split/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/focus-group-obama-inches-the-health-meter-forward-but-party-lines-still-split/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dial test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=15591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama's recent health care address restored some confidence in his handling of the topic according to a focus group polled by CBS News in conjunction with Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama&#8217;s recent health care address to a joint session of Congress restored some confidence in his handling of the topic according to a focus group polled by CBS News in conjunction with Nielsen.  The panel consisted of seven Republicans, 17 Democrats, eight Independents, and four people who identified as something else. Overall, Democrats and Independents showed the most notable shift in confidence when asked their opinion immediately before and after the speech.</p>
<h3>Panel confidence before and after speech</h3>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<col width="256"></col>
<col width="36"></col>
<col width="34"></col>
<col width="46"></col>
<col width="76"></col>
<col width="70"></col>
<col width="87"></col>
<col width="88"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="25">
<td rowspan="2" width="256" height="42"><strong>Pre-Speech: </strong>Overall how would you describe your level of confidence in the current administration&#8217;s plans for health care?</td>
<td width="36">All</td>
<td colspan="2" width="80">Sex</td>
<td colspan="4" width="321">Generally speaking, do you usually consider    yourself?</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="36" height="17">Total</td>
<td width="34">Male</td>
<td width="46">Female</td>
<td width="76">Republican</td>
<td width="70">Democrat</td>
<td width="87">Independent</td>
<td width="88">Something Else</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">Sample    Size: N=</td>
<td width="36">36</td>
<td width="34">18</td>
<td width="46">18</td>
<td width="76">7</td>
<td width="70">17</td>
<td width="87">8</td>
<td width="88">4</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">1 &#8211; Not    at all confident</td>
<td width="36">22%</td>
<td width="34">17%</td>
<td width="46">28%</td>
<td width="76">43%</td>
<td width="70">12%</td>
<td width="87">25%</td>
<td width="88">25%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">2</td>
<td width="36">8%</td>
<td width="34">11%</td>
<td width="46">6%</td>
<td width="76">14%</td>
<td width="70">0%</td>
<td width="87">12%</td>
<td width="88">25%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">3</td>
<td width="36">33%</td>
<td width="34">44%</td>
<td width="46">22%</td>
<td width="76">0%</td>
<td width="70">29%</td>
<td width="87">62%</td>
<td width="88">50%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">4</td>
<td width="36">22%</td>
<td width="34">22%</td>
<td width="46">22%</td>
<td width="76">29%</td>
<td width="70">35%</td>
<td width="87">0%</td>
<td width="88">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">5 &#8211;    Very confident</td>
<td width="36">14%</td>
<td width="34">6%</td>
<td width="46">22%</td>
<td width="76">14%</td>
<td width="70">24%</td>
<td width="87">0%</td>
<td width="88">0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<col width="256"></col>
<col width="36"></col>
<col width="34"></col>
<col width="46"></col>
<col width="76"></col>
<col width="70"></col>
<col width="87"></col>
<col width="88"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="39">
<td rowspan="2" width="256" height="56"><strong>Post Speech:</strong> How would you    describe your level of confidence in the current administration&#8217;s plans for    health care?</td>
<td width="36">All</td>
<td colspan="2" width="80">Sex</td>
<td colspan="4" width="321">Generally speaking, do you usually consider    yourself?</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="36" height="17">Total</td>
<td width="34">Male</td>
<td width="46">Female</td>
<td width="76">Republican</td>
<td width="70">Democrat</td>
<td width="87">Independent</td>
<td width="88">Something Else</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">Sample    Size: N=</td>
<td width="36">36</td>
<td width="34">18</td>
<td width="46">18</td>
<td width="76">7</td>
<td width="70">17</td>
<td width="87">8</td>
<td width="88">4</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">1 &#8211; Not    at all confident</td>
<td width="36">8%</td>
<td width="34">6%</td>
<td width="46">11%</td>
<td width="76">29%</td>
<td width="70">0%</td>
<td width="87">12%</td>
<td width="88">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">2</td>
<td width="36">6%</td>
<td width="34">6%</td>
<td width="46">6%</td>
<td width="76">14%</td>
<td width="70">0%</td>
<td width="87">12%</td>
<td width="88">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">3</td>
<td width="36">11%</td>
<td width="34">11%</td>
<td width="46">11%</td>
<td width="76">14%</td>
<td width="70">6%</td>
<td width="87">12%</td>
<td width="88">25%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">4</td>
<td width="36">28%</td>
<td width="34">33%</td>
<td width="46">22%</td>
<td width="76">29%</td>
<td width="70">18%</td>
<td width="87">50%</td>
<td width="88">25%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="256" height="17">5 &#8211;    Very confident</td>
<td width="36">47%</td>
<td width="34">44%</td>
<td width="46">50%</td>
<td width="76">14%</td>
<td width="70">76%</td>
<td width="87">12%</td>
<td width="88">50%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-15591"></span><br />
During the speech, the panel also indicated their positive and negative reactions using dial meters, which showed the health care debate is still sharply divided among party lines.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/FromTheBrink.PNG"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-15604" title="FromTheBrink" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/FromTheBrink-150x150.PNG" alt="FromTheBrink" width="70" height="70" /></a>Discussing the impact of the bailouts and stimulus, the President noted efforts earlier in the year had &#8220;<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/FromTheBrink.PNG">pulled the economy back from the brink</a>,&#8221; driving Democratic support high, and sending the Independent and Republican meters downward. Similarly, when the President brought up the costs of the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IraqWarAndTaxBreaks.PNG">Bush administration tax cuts and the cost of the Iraq war</a>, Democrats responded enthusiastically as Independents and Republicans headed in the other direction.<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IraqWarAndTaxBreaks.PNG"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-15606 alignleft" title="IraqWarAndTaxBreaks" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IraqWarAndTaxBreaks-150x150.PNG" alt="IraqWarAndTaxBreaks" width="70" height="70" /></a></p>
<h3>Online Reaction</h3>
<p>Outside the focus group, internet chatter related to the President&#8217;s two speeches this week, the address, and a speech to school children the day before, online sentiment for the speech was generally positive according to Nielsen Buzzmetrics. However, the school speech drew much more attention based on controversy surrounding parental and school concerns about the scope and potential partisan nature of the President speaking to school children to promote his agenda.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/obama_speech_buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-15618" title="obama_speech_buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/obama_speech_buzz.png" alt="obama_speech_buzz" width="525" height="400" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/focus-group-obama-inches-the-health-meter-forward-but-party-lines-still-split/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain And Obama Highs And Lows From Debate Dial Tests</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mccain-and-obama-highs-and-lows-from-debate-dial-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mccain-and-obama-highs-and-lows-from-debate-dial-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dial test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the first presidential debate on September 26, Barack Obama&#8217;s comments on oil independence, health care, the Iraq War, and Al Qaeda drew the most positive responses from a panel of uncommitted, registered voters who allowed CBS and Nielsen to capture their real-time reactions to the first presidential debate Friday night.
As they watched the debate, panel members turned a dial between 0 and 100 to indicate their reactions to the candidates&#8217; discussion. 100 indicates a &#8220;very positive&#8221; response, 0 corresponds with a &#8220;very negative&#8221; response, and 50 is neutral. Nielsen ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/election2008_button19-300x299.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="143" />During the first presidential debate on September 26, Barack Obama&#8217;s comments on oil independence, health care, the Iraq War, and Al Qaeda drew the most positive responses from a panel of uncommitted, registered voters who allowed CBS and Nielsen to capture their real-time reactions to the first presidential debate Friday night.</p>
<p>As they watched the debate, panel members turned a dial between 0 and 100 to indicate their reactions to the candidates&#8217; discussion. 100 indicates a &#8220;very positive&#8221; response, 0 corresponds with a &#8220;very negative&#8221; response, and 50 is neutral. Nielsen calculated the average of the 44 respondents&#8217; responses. The panel, and its results, are not part of CBS’s election polling, and the panel is not large enough to be statistically significant according to Nielsen’s standards.</p>
<p><span id="more-1746"></span></p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s discussion of oil independence and health, at roughly 26 minutes into the debate, drew the overall most positive response from the CBS/Nielsen panel.</p>
<p>In contrast, John McCain&#8217;s closing comments (92:21 &#8211; 95:37) summarizing his qualifications for the presidency and his plans for keeping the U.S. safe drew some of the least positive responses from the respondents. McCain&#8217;s high point came just minutes earlier when discussing the importance of success in Iraq. Obama&#8217;s lowest response came during his discussion of investing in the American dream.</p>
<p>The candidates&#8217; contentious exchange on energy policy (83:29) also drew negative responses from the CBS/Nielsen panel.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/debate1/Debate_NewsSegment.wmv" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-1757 aligncenter" title="debatetrackingvideo" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/debatetrackingvideo.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>The 22 men and 22 women on the panel had largely similar responses to the debate. In several instances, McCain&#8217;s comments drew markedly less positive reactions from female panelists (13:13, 27:53, and 62:57).</p>
<p>When parsed by age, the data indicates that respondents of all ages also showed largely similar responses to the candidates&#8217; comments. However, panelists aged 35-54 occasionally deviated from the norm, registering less positive responses than panelists between the ages of 18-34 and 55-99 when Obama discussed his plan for the financial crisis (approximately 3:30), dealing with Pakistan (53:29 &#8211; 54:57), and holding diplomatic talks with countries hostile to the U.S. (68:49 &#8211; 70:17).</p>
<p>Panelists&#8217; responses were measured at CBS&#8217;s TV City research facility in Las Vegas, using Nielsen technology.</p>
<p>View <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nielsencbsdebateanalysis.ppt">complete data</a> from CBS and Nielsen&#8217;s first debate response panel.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nielsencbsdebateanalysis.ppt"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1753" title="debatetracking" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/debatetracking.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>View CBS&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/debate1/Debate_NewsSegment.wmv" target="_blank">on-air analysis</a> of the panel results.</p>
<p>Read coverage of Nielsen&#8217;s findings in <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/09/cbsnielsen_debate_test_scores.php" target="_blank">TV Week</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mccain-and-obama-highs-and-lows-from-debate-dial-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

