<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Cleveland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/cleveland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In the Busiest Month for Political TV Ads, Cleveland Rocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/in-the-busiest-month-for-political-tv-ads-cleveland-rocks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/in-the-busiest-month-for-political-tv-ads-cleveland-rocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot tv ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, American TV viewers were exposed to almost 1.48 million political ads, up from the 1.41 million political ads aired in October 2008 (the last major presidential election year), according to data released today by Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even in a midterm election cycle, American TV viewers were inundated with more TV ads than perhaps ever before.</p>
<p>Last month, American TV viewers were exposed to almost 1.48 million  political ads, up from the 1.41 million political ads aired in October  2008 (the last major presidential election year), according to data released today by Nielsen. It was the largest political ad output on record in what is traditionally known as the busiest month of the year for political messaging. Nielsen data over the last five calendar years suggest that TV distributors air twice as many political and issue ads in October than any other month, on average.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/political-ads-average.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24493" title="political-ads-average" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/political-ads-average.png" alt="political-ads-average" width="564" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>For some media markets, political ads are especially dominant in the local TV landscape, and nowhere is this more evident than Ohio.  In an analysis of local broadcast TV outlets in the top 128 U.S. markets in October, Cleveland stations aired the highest proportion of political and issue advertising.  Nielsen found that about one out of every four paid TV ads aired on local Cleveland stations was placed by a political candidate or outside political group. Ohio&#8217;s capital city Columbus placed a very close second in the ranking with an estimated 23.37% of paid ads bought by political entities. Portland, OR, Sacramento, CA, and Seattle, WA round out the top 5.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> HIGHEST SATURATION OF POLITICAL ADVERTISING, BY MARKET<br />
10/1 to 10/31/10</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> MARKET</th>
<th> # OF POLITICAL ADS*</th>
<th> TOTAL # OF ADS**</th>
<th> POLITICAL AD %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Cleveland, OH</td>
<td>29,689</td>
<td>126,656</td>
<td>23.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Columbus, OH</td>
<td>24,693</td>
<td>105,651</td>
<td>23.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Portland, OR</td>
<td>25,527</td>
<td>117,208</td>
<td>21.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Sacramento, CA</td>
<td>26,965</td>
<td>127,318</td>
<td>21.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Seattle, WA</td>
<td>26,071</td>
<td>133,874</td>
<td>19.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Champaign-Springfield, IL</td>
<td>14,662</td>
<td>77,264</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Reno, NV</td>
<td>18,364</td>
<td>98,414</td>
<td>18.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Denver, CO</td>
<td>24,302</td>
<td>130,255</td>
<td>18.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Orlando, FL</td>
<td>22,517</td>
<td>122,417</td>
<td>18.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>West Palm Beach, FL</td>
<td>18,546</td>
<td>101,126</td>
<td>18.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
* &#8211; Includes all TV ads placed on local broadcast TV outlets within the  given market by groups characterized as political and professional  organizations<br />
** &#8211; Includes all national and local paid ads aired on TV stations monitored by Nielsen in the given market; excludes promos and PSAs<br />
Note: results may be impacted by the number of broadcast viewing sources captured by Nielsen in  each local market.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Ohio&#8217;s status as a political TV battleground is nothing new.  In 2008, six Ohio DMAs placed among the top 20 markets with the highest rate of political ads in October, and in the last midterm election in 2006, five markets from the Buckeye State placed in the top 20.</p>
<p>Of course, not all U.S. TV markets were as politically saturated. Ohioans seeking a respite from this year&#8217;s political noise may have wanted to lay low in Jackson, MS, where only one percent of paid TV ads airing on local stations were classified as political or issue ads. The Richmond, VA market had the second lowest rate of political saturation among the 128 markets analyzed in October at just 2.45%.  Richmond&#8217;s ranking comes in stark contrast to the same time last year, when it ranked fourth nationally in political TV saturation, thanks to <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/campaign-ad-races-heat-up-in-va-nj-and-ny-contests/">a high-profile governor&#8217;s race</a> in an otherwise off year for political campaigns.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Texas offered four of the ten least saturated markets last month.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> LOWEST SATURATION OF POLITICAL ADVERTISING, BY MARKET<br />
10/1 to 10/31/10</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> MARKET</th>
<th> # OF POLITICAL ADS*</th>
<th> TOTAL # OF ADS**</th>
<th> POLITICAL AD %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Jackson, MS</td>
<td>827</td>
<td>81,218</td>
<td>1.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Richmond-Petersburg, VA</td>
<td>2,466</td>
<td>100,774</td>
<td>2.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Lincoln-Hastings-Kearney, NE</td>
<td>2,036</td>
<td>72,851</td>
<td>2.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Salt Lake City, UT</td>
<td>3,321</td>
<td>112,984</td>
<td>2.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Tyler-Longview, TX</td>
<td>1,876</td>
<td>52,141</td>
<td>3.60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Chattanooga, TN</td>
<td>3,370</td>
<td>91,703</td>
<td>3.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Knoxville, TN</td>
<td>3,916</td>
<td>100,463</td>
<td>3.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Harlingen-Brownsville, TX</td>
<td>4,407</td>
<td>109,719</td>
<td>4.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX</td>
<td>7,596</td>
<td>188,308</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Houston, TX</td>
<td>6,602</td>
<td>159,868</td>
<td>4.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
* &#8211; Includes all TV ads placed on local broadcast TV outlets within the given market by groups characterized as political and professional organizations<br />
** &#8211; Includes all national and local paid ads aired on TV stations  monitored by Nielsen in the given market; excludes promos and PSAs<br />
Note: results may be impacted by the number of broadcast viewing sources captured by Nielsen in  each local market.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Download the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/NielsenWire-Political_Ads_by_Market_100110_103110.xls">full rankings</a> of all 128 markets contained in Nielsen&#8217;s October political advertising analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/in-the-busiest-month-for-political-tv-ads-cleveland-rocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rochester, Buffalo, Cleveland Top Newspaper Reading Cities</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarborough Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rochester, NY, is the top U.S. city for newspaper readership, according to a new analysis of Integrated Newspaper Audience (INA) data from Scarborough Research, a partnership between Arbitron and The Nielsen Company. A higher percentage of adults in Rochester, NY, are reading newspapers in print or online than in any other U.S. market. The INA of Rochester is 87% &#8211; meaning that 87% of adults in the Rochester DMA read a printed newspaper, a newspaper&#8217;s website, or did both during the past week. Following closely behind are Cleveland, OH and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7609" title="newspaper" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/newspaper-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="151" height="99" /></a>Rochester, NY, is the top U.S. city for newspaper readership, according to a new analysis of <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/scarboroughini.pdf">Integrated Newspaper Audience (INA) data</a> from <a href="http://www.scarborough.com" target="_blank">Scarborough Research</a>, a partnership between Arbitron and The Nielsen Company. A higher percentage of adults in Rochester, NY, are reading newspapers in print or online than in any other U.S. market. The INA of Rochester is 87% &#8211; meaning that 87% of adults in the Rochester DMA read a printed newspaper, a newspaper&#8217;s website, or did both during the past week. Following closely behind are Cleveland, OH and Buffalo, NY, each with an INA of 86%. In the 81 local markets measured by Scarborough, 75% of adults read the newspaper weekly in print or online.</p>
<p>&#8220;This data begs the question: is the constant negative news feed on the industry warranted when newspapers are actually being read by three-fourths of the adult population? When you look at audience data, it seems irrational that advertisers are leaving newspapers because the numbers speak for themselves,&#8221; said Gary Meo, senior vice president, print and digital media, Scarborough Research.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top Local Markets for Integrated Newspaper Audience</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> DMA® %</th>
<th> %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Rochester, NY</td>
<td>87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Cleveland/Akron, OH</td>
<td>86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Buffalo, NY</td>
<td>86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pittsburgh, PA</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Syracuse, NY</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston, MA</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Hartford/New Haven, CT</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Albany/Schenectady/Troy, NY</td>
<td>85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>New York, NY</td>
<td>84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, PA</td>
<td>84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">source: Scarborough Research</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top 10 Newspaper Websites: February 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> News Source</th>
<th> Readership</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NYTimes.com</td>
<td>20,126,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>USATODAY.com</td>
<td>13,430,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>washingtonpost.com</td>
<td>9,240,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>LA Times</td>
<td>8,421,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Wall Street Journal Online</td>
<td>6,842,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Boston.com</td>
<td>5,659,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>New York Post</td>
<td>5,121,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Daily News Online Edition</td>
<td>4,924,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Chicago Tribune</td>
<td>4,016,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Politico</td>
<td>3,726,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">source: Nielsen Online US, Home and Work</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/rochester-buffalo-cleveland-top-newspaper-reading-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

