<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; category purchases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/category-purchases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Winning the War on Price</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/winning-the-war-on-price/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/winning-the-war-on-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitive pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When retailers compete on price and rollbacks are market-wide, retail traffic trends rarely change. More importantly, Nielsen research shows that price rollbacks can actually reduce category dollars, making an effective pricing strategy a necessity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/cost2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24127" title="cost2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/cost2.jpg" alt="cost2" width="563" height="151" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>SUMMARY</strong>: When retailers compete on price and rollbacks are market-wide, retail traffic trends rarely change. More importantly, Nielsen research shows that price rollbacks can actually reduce category dollars, making an effective pricing strategy a necessity.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><em>Rob Schram, Vice President Analytic Consulting, The Nielsen Company</em></strong></p>
<p>When commodity costs for foods rose dramatically in 2008, most manufacturers were forced to raise prices to protect margins—some more than once. Once commodity prices dropped, retailers put pressure on manufacturers to lower prices. But as the Great Recession took hold and consumers cut back on spending, manufacturers wanted higher prices to stick to compensate for the flat unit growth experienced in most categories.</p>
<p>And so the price wars began. And true to life, in war there are no winners. When retailers compete on price and rollbacks are market-wide, there are no inherent traffic gains. In fact, Nielsen research shows that price rollbacks can actually reduce category dollars.</p>
<p><strong>Profitable Pricing</strong><br />
Retailers intending to fight on price better know which categories to target or they will be fighting a losing battle. Price elasticity is a measure of consumers’ likelihood to purchase in relation to a change in price. If you raise prices on categories with a price elasticity of less than one, or take a price rollback, you can actually decrease category sales. It’s a delicate balancing act. A price rollback may slightly increase category volume, but not as much as price goes down—so dollar sales actually go down. And vice versa on price increases—sales go up, but not as much as volume goes down.</p>
<p>Pinpointing best-bet categories requires knowing how elastic they are to price changes. High-elasticity categories are more sensitive to price changes because they are considered less of a necessity. When the opportunity cost of buying these products become too high, consumers opt out. These categories are typically commoditized products with low differentiation. Examples include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Paper towels</li>
<li>Canned vegetables</li>
<li>Canned pet food</li>
<li>Canned fruit</li>
<li>Incontinence care</li>
</ul>
<p>Conversely, low-elasticity categories are more insensitive to price changes because they are typically the “must have” items that consumers will continue to buy no matter the price. These categories are typically perishable, convenient and are less commoditized. Examples include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Sliced cheese</li>
<li>Dry pet food</li>
<li>Macaroni &amp; cheese</li>
<li>Frozen side dishes</li>
<li>Deli meat</li>
<li>Bath tissue</li>
<li>Microwaveable meals</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Six Keys to Successful Price Planning</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Plan pricing from two starting points – supply side / demand side.</strong> Define profit goals by forecasting the cost of goods, labor and transportation costs and plant capacity. And understand consumers’ price sensitivity to both your price and your competitor’s.</li>
<li><strong>Establish a cyclical price management process.</strong> From planning and implementing to tracking, maintaining on-going control of the process will ensure that profit requirements are met and promotion response is achieved.</li>
<li><strong>Take a portfolio approach.</strong> Understanding the price elasticity of each item in the portfolio in relation to the profit impact of a price increase provides a path to meeting corporate profit goals in a unified approach.</li>
<li><strong>Focus on hard metrics at the center.</strong> Hard metrics with common definitions like shelf prices, list prices shipments and financials across brand groups must be the focus of any price planning approach.</li>
<li><strong>Establish KPI’s and milestones.</strong> Determine scorecards for all key brands and track results and the execution. Be prepared to adjust the plan to react to marketplace changes and competitive initiatives.</li>
<li><strong>Endorse and enforce.</strong> A portfolio approach means that some brands will take price changes and other will not. All parties in the process must follow the process and understand the broader goals.</li>
</ol>
<p>Price wars are a long-term proposition, where over-reacting often leads to failure. Long-term winners innovate and differentiate and know that while price is important, value is more important. Careful planning, research and ongoing management are the steps it takes to win the war on price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/winning-the-war-on-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Baby-Related Product Categories Skew To Larger U.S. Households</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-baby-related-product-categories-skew-to-larger-us-households/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-baby-related-product-categories-skew-to-larger-us-households/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakfast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cereal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dried fruit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[households with 5 or more members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prepared food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanitary protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=3391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. households with five or more members spent almost 2.5 times as much on diapers and baby food than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.
Although they represent only 10.5% of U.S. households, these larger households represented 27.6% of disposable diaper dollar sales and 26.7% of baby food dollar sales during the time period.
Other categories skewing to larger households include prepared food mixes, frozen juices, and breakfast foods.



Rank
(by highest index)
Top 10 Categories:
U.S. Households With
5 Or More Members
Dollar Volume Index


1
Disposable Diapers
263


2
Baby Food
255


3
Prepared Food &#8211; ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/large-household.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3398" title="large-household" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/large-household-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>U.S. households with five or more members spent almost 2.5 times as much on diapers and baby food than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>Although they represent only 10.5% of U.S. households, these larger households represented 27.6% of disposable diaper dollar sales and 26.7% of baby food dollar sales during the time period.</p>
<p>Other categories skewing to larger households include prepared food mixes, frozen juices, and breakfast foods.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Categories:<br />
U.S. Households With<br />
5 Or More Members</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Disposable Diapers</td>
<td>263</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Baby Food</td>
<td>255</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Prepared Food &#8211; Dry Mixes</td>
<td>191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Juices, Drinks &#8211; Frozen</td>
<td>188</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Sanitary Protection</td>
<td>184</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Breakfast Food</td>
<td>183</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fruit &#8211; Dried</td>
<td>180</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Table Syrups, Molasses</td>
<td>176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Baby Needs</td>
<td>175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Cereal</td>
<td>175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="3">*Note: “Dollar Volume Index” is a demographic segment’s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment’s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-3391"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting larger households may want to promote these categories with feature ads, displays, and product assortments. Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p>Nielsen’s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen’s <a href="http://www2.acnielsen.com/products/cps_homescan.shtml" target="_blank">Homescan consumer panel</a>, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population. Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-baby-related-product-categories-skew-to-larger-us-households/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEMO DRILL DOWN: Wine, Diet Aids, Gardening Product Categories Skew To High-Income U.S. Households</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dairy dips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet aids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh produce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[households earning $100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refrigerated drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skin care preparations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=2867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. households earning $100,000 or more in annual income, spent more than twice as much on wine than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.
Although they represent only 18.7% of U.S. households, high-income households represented 39.6% of wine dollar sales during the time period. 
Other categories skewing to households with high incomes include diet aids, liquor, and floral/gardening supplies.



Rank
(by highest index)
Top 10 Category Purchases:
U.S. Households
With $100,000+ Annual Income
Dollar Volume Index*


1
Wine
212


2
Diet Aids
158


3
Liquor
156


4
Floral / Gardening
155


5
Baby Needs
152


6
Snacks / Spreads / Dairy Dips
148


7
Baby Food
147


8
Skin Care Preparations
147


9
Fresh Produce
144


10
Juices / Refrigerated Drinks
142


*Note: &#8220;Dollar Volume ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/diversity.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2874" title="diversity" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/diversity-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>U.S. households earning $100,000 or more in annual income, spent more than twice as much on wine than average American consumers during the 52 weeks ending June 28, 2008.</p>
<p>Although they represent only 18.7% of U.S. households, high-income households represented 39.6% of wine dollar sales during the time period. </p>
<p>Other categories skewing to households with high incomes include diet aids, liquor, and floral/gardening supplies.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(by highest index)</th>
<th>Top 10 Category Purchases:<br />
U.S. Households<br />
With $100,000+ Annual Income</th>
<th>Dollar Volume Index*</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Wine</td>
<td>212</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Diet Aids</td>
<td>158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Liquor</td>
<td>156</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Floral / Gardening</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Baby Needs</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Snacks / Spreads / Dairy Dips</td>
<td>148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Baby Food</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Skin Care Preparations</td>
<td>147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Fresh Produce</td>
<td>144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Juices / Refrigerated Drinks</td>
<td>142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">*Note: &#8220;Dollar Volume Index&#8221; is a demographic segment&#8217;s share of dollar sales, divided by a segment&#8217;s share of U.S. households, multiplied by 100.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (June 30, 2007 &#8211; June 28, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-2867"></span></p>
<p><em>Nielsen’s Marketing Tip:<br />
</em>Retailers targeting high-income households may want to promote these categories with feature ads, displays, and product assortments.  Manufacturers should consider cross-promoting and cross-couponing items in these categories.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s Dollar Volume Index identifies demographic groups that account for above or below average dollar volume purchases for a given product category.</p>
<p>Data for the index was collected via Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://www2.acnielsen.com/products/cps_homescan.shtml" target="_blank">Homescan consumer panel</a>, a nationally representative sample of U.S. households that provides a stratified, proportionate, non-biased representation of the U.S. population.  Homescan panelists scan all of their UPC coded purchases after every shopping trip, allowing Nielsen to capture their complete shopping and buying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/demo-drill-down-wine-diet-aids-gardening-product-categories-skew-to-high-income-us-households/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

