<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/barack-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Memorial Day, More Spock than Barack in May&#8217;s Most-Blogged Topics</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/memorial-day-more-spock-than-barack-in-mays-most-blogged-topics/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/memorial-day-more-spock-than-barack-in-mays-most-blogged-topics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorial Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Memorial Day, Star Trek and President Obama topped Nielsen&#8217;s monthly index of most blogged news stories for May 2009, according to the just released top 10 most-blogged topics report.
Conversations about Memorial Day ranged from the hottest retail sales during the holiday to plans for the weekend. So what were bloggers doing? Maybe they were at the movies. Two of the top 10 topics in May were the new movie releases, Star Trek and Terminator Salvation.

Political figures were also widely discussed in May, with Barack Obama being the No. 3 most ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memorial Day, <em>Star Trek</em> and President Obama topped Nielsen&#8217;s monthly index of most blogged news stories for May 2009, according to the just released top 10 most-blogged topics report.</p>
<p>Conversations about Memorial Day ranged from the hottest retail sales during the holiday to plans for the weekend. So what were bloggers doing? Maybe they were at the movies. Two of the top 10 topics in May were the new movie releases, <em>Star Trek</em> and <em>Terminator Salvation</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bursty_may.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12572" title="bursty_may" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bursty_may.png" alt="" width="300" height="285" /></a></p>
<p>Political figures were also widely discussed in May, with Barack Obama being the No. 3 most talked about topic for the month. Bloggers buzzed about the president&#8217;s desire to pass a new credit card reform law, his planned trip to the Middle East, and his visit to the University of Notre Dame. In fact, his visit to Notre Dame was so widely discussed that the phrase, Notre Dame, became the 5th most talked about subject in May. President Obama&#8217;s May 26th nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court was also widely discussed among bloggers. Former Vice President Dick Cheney also emerged as the fourth most blogged-about topic.</p>
<h3>Bloggers Still Buzzing about the Flu</h3>
<p>While Swine Flu was top of mind for many bloggers in April, it fell to No. 8 in May. Bloggers continued to discuss the latest cases and growing number of infected; however, there were also many conversations that discussed how the initial panic surrounding the epidemic was over-inflated and unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/memorial-day-more-spock-than-barack-in-mays-most-blogged-topics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 100 Days Press Conference Draws 28.8M Viewers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obamas-100-days-press-conference-draws-288m-viewers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obamas-100-days-press-conference-draws-288m-viewers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first 100 days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night&#8217;s primetime press conference to mark Barack Obama&#8217;s 100th day in office was viewed by 28.8 million people in the U.S., according to The Nielsen Company. The event pulled an 18.8 household rating on 10 TV networks.
Viewership for the presser was 29% less than the President&#8217;s last press conference on March 24, which was seen on 11 networks. President Obama&#8217;s first primetime press conference was watched by 49.5 million U.S. viewers on eight networks.
PRESIDENT OBAMA&#8217;S PRIMETIME PRESS CONFERENCE RATINGS



DATE
# OF NETWORKS
HH RATING
HH SHARE
# OF VIEWERS P2+ (in millions)


4/29/2009
10
18.8
27
28.8


3/24/2009
11
25.9
45
40.4


2/9/2009
8
30.8
47
49.5


source: The Nielsen Company, 2009



Networks airing ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night&#8217;s primetime press conference to mark Barack Obama&#8217;s 100<sup>th</sup> day in office was viewed by 28.8 million people in the U.S., according to The Nielsen Company. The event pulled an 18.8 household rating on 10 TV networks.</p>
<p>Viewership for the presser was 29% less than the President&#8217;s last press conference on March 24, which was seen on 11 networks. President Obama&#8217;s first primetime press conference was watched by 49.5 million U.S. viewers on eight networks.</p>
<p style="center;"><!-- start chart --><strong>PRESIDENT OBAMA&#8217;S PRIMETIME PRESS CONFERENCE RATINGS</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>DATE</th>
<th># OF NETWORKS</th>
<th>HH RATING</th>
<th>HH SHARE</th>
<th># OF VIEWERS P2+ (in millions)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4/29/2009</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>18.8</td>
<td>27</td>
<td>28.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3/24/2009</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>25.9</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>40.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2/9/2009</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>30.8</td>
<td>47</td>
<td>49.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">source: The Nielsen Company, 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Networks airing last night&#8217;s press conference from 8pm to 9pm ET included ABC, CBS, NBC, Univision, CNN, FOX News, MSNBC, CNBC, and MUN2. Telemundo aired the press conference on a tape delay at 11:35pm ET.</p>
<p>Download the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/obamapressconf-4-29-091.pdf">media advisory</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obamas-100-days-press-conference-draws-288m-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Three Screen Presidency</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/president-obamas-three-screen-presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/president-obamas-three-screen-presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first 100 days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitehouse.gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karen Watson,  Managing Director, Government &#38; Public Sector Sales, The Nielsen Company
One hundred days is scarcely enough time to draw any firm conclusions about a new president&#8217;s capabilities. Even so, Barack Obama has garnered considerable respect for his media skills. Pundits have dubbed him the &#8220;new media president;&#8221; while some of the most cynical among them believe his underlying strategy is to end run traditional Washington gatekeepers by communicating more directly with constituents sympathetic to his agenda. But his fans and critics alike may be missing the bigger picture.
&#8220;As audiences ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/obama_blackberry.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-11195" title="obama_blackberry" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/obama_blackberry.png" alt="" width="150" height="94" /></a><em><strong>Karen Watson,  Managing Director, Government &amp; Public Sector Sales, The Nielsen Company</strong></em></p>
<p>One hundred days is scarcely enough time to draw any firm conclusions about a new president&#8217;s capabilities. Even so, Barack Obama has garnered considerable respect for his media skills. Pundits have dubbed him the &#8220;new media president;&#8221; while some of the most cynical among them believe his underlying strategy is to end run traditional Washington gatekeepers by communicating more directly with constituents sympathetic to his agenda. But his fans and critics alike may be missing the bigger picture.</p>
<div style="border: 1px solid #cccccc; padding: 5px; float: right; width: 200px; background-color: #f4f4f4; font-weight: bold; text-align: right;">&#8220;As audiences continually fragment into smaller, self-defined groups, communicating with them will mean working across multiple platforms.&#8221;</div>
<p>It&#8217;s true Mr. Obama has readily embraced most things digital. Throughout much of his campaign, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/web-traffic-to-prez-candidates-sites-up-in-september/">his unique online audience</a> bested those of his opponents &#8211; Hillary Clinton during the primaries, and John McCain in the general election &#8211; sometimes two-to-one. His historic 26-word text message announcing Joe Biden as his running mate reached nearly three million U.S. mobile subscribers, and is considered the nation&#8217;s single largest mobile marketing event ever. And since taking the oath of office, he has continued to use the web to blog on vital issues and field questions from the public. <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/engaging-the-public-video-viewing-up-at-whitehousegov/"></a></p>
<p>It should come as no surprise, however, that the president is taking full advantage of new technologies. Given the current state of the media, it would be more astonishing if he didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><span id="more-11159"></span></p>
<p>American consumers, like their counterparts around the world, have a seemingly insatiable appetite for information, from just about everywhere. Time spent with blogs and social networks, for example, is <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-networking-new-global-footprint/">increasing globally</a> at more than three times the rate of overall Internet growth, particularly among audiences 50 and older. Little wonder then that Mr. Obama is active on Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and Twitter.</p>
<p>Much has also been made about the president&#8217;s penchant for his Blackberry. Yet with the typical U.S. mobile subscriber now sending and receiving <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/in-us-text-messaging-tops-mobile-phone-calling/">more text-based data than voice calls</a>, the ability to &#8220;thumb&#8221; a message is critical to reaching certain sectors of the population.</p>
<p>Still, it is with video, the emerging lingua franca of the 21st century, that Mr. Obama has probably been most prolific. Americans today watch more video than ever before, primarily on three screens &#8211; television, the Internet and cell phones. But despite the growth of online and mobile media, more than 99 percent of screen time is still in front of the TV set in the home. Acknowledging this fact, the president has made ample use of the medium. [see: <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/engaging-the-public-video-viewing-up-at-whitehousegov/">Video Viewing Up At WhiteHouse.gov]</a></p>
<p>Tonight, he will hold his third televised press conference, raising his monthly average above any other president since John F. Kennedy. Last month he appeared on both <em>The Tonight Show</em> and <em>60 Minutes</em>, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/40-million-watch-president-obama-press-conference/">helping to drive up their ratings</a> to the highest levels in four and 10 years respectively.</p>
<p>Consequently, President Obama has underscored two important facets of an ever-changing media landscape. First, as audiences continually fragment into smaller, self-defined groups, communicating with them will mean working across multiple platforms.  Second, the process is not a zero sum game. At any given time, consumers tend to favor the best available screen, basing their decisions on factors such as convenience, availability of content and the quality of the viewing experience. Thus, new media alone will not be enough to successfully reach all constituencies.</p>
<p>Regardless, Barack Obama will increasingly turn to new and emerging media technologies, as will the rest of the nation. Yet he is hardly the only president to do so. Some 67 years ago, Franklin Roosevelt became the &#8220;radio president,&#8221; as people began listening to radio to help carry them through the Great Depression.  For his part, JFK initiated live, televised news conferences.</p>
<p>Back then as now, neither was the first to use their respective medium, though each was the first to truly master it.  Like President Obama today, each was also able, to some degree, to bypass mainstream filters and talk more directly to the public. Since the invention of movable type, that has historically been one of the key advantages of any new medium.  What is more, it is not likely to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/president-obamas-three-screen-presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Networks Balance News vs. Bottom Line with Obama Press Conference</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/networks-balance-news-vs-bottom-line-with-obama-press-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/networks-balance-news-vs-bottom-line-with-obama-press-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annie Touliatos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Monitor-Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama marks his 100th day in office tonight with his third primetime press conference since January. The President&#8217;s request for air time adds a strain not only to each network&#8217;s news resources, but also to their overall bottom line.
It&#8217;s no secret that the 8pm hour generates much-needed ad dollars for broadcast TV networks. In February, ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC combined to average $21.5 million in revenue on Wednesdays from 8pm to 9pm ET. With that kind of money in play, networks are forced to balance their public service duties with financial obligations.
So ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/barack_tv2.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-11188" title="barack_tv2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/barack_tv2.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" /></a>President Obama marks his 100th day in office tonight with his third <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?s=obama+press+conference">primetime press conference</a> since January. The President&#8217;s request for air time adds a strain not only to each network&#8217;s news resources, but also to their overall bottom line.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that the 8pm hour generates much-needed ad dollars for broadcast TV networks. In February, ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC combined to average $21.5 million in revenue on Wednesdays from 8pm to 9pm ET. With that kind of money in play, networks are forced to balance their public service duties with financial obligations.</p>
<p>So what happens to advertisers who pay good money to place ads on pre-empted primetime broadcasting?</p>
<p>&#8220;In a situation like that, networks will find other ways to make good on their deals with advertisers,&#8221; says Annie Touliatos, VP for Sales Development at Monitor-Plus, Nielsen&#8217;s advertising intelligence service. &#8220;They can shift programming or offer to run the ad another week. They can also spread the ad buy over several spots that offer the advertiser the same level of viewer impressions. The key is for advertisers to ensure they will reach their target audiences effectively.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/networks-balance-news-vs-bottom-line-with-obama-press-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First 100 Days: Economic Crisis Now Tied to &#8220;Brand Obama&#8221; Online</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/first-100-days-economic-crisis-now-tied-to-brand-obama-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/first-100-days-economic-crisis-now-tied-to-brand-obama-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first 100 days]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valerie Bogus, Nielsen Online
President Barack Obama has reached his 100th day in office amid generally positive sentiment according to a Nielsen Online analysis of online &#8220;buzz&#8221; surrounding the 44th President. Using our Brand Association Map to plot keywords and phrases, we demonstrate visually how the conversations have shifted between his first 100 days in office, compared to the 100 days before his swearing in.
The economy and the economic stimulus package are the isues most closely associated with President Obama&#8217;s tenure, as words like &#8220;crisis,&#8221; &#8220;trillion,&#8221; &#8220;banks,&#8221; and &#8220;tax&#8221; are nested ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valerie Bogus, Nielsen Online</p>
<p>President Barack Obama has reached his 100th day in office amid generally positive sentiment according to a Nielsen Online analysis of online &#8220;buzz&#8221; surrounding the 44th President. Using our <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=11144#BAM">Brand Association Map</a> to plot keywords and phrases, we demonstrate visually how the conversations have shifted between his first 100 days in office, compared to the 100 days before his swearing in.</p>
<p>The economy and the economic stimulus package are the isues most closely associated with President Obama&#8217;s tenure, as words like &#8220;crisis,&#8221; &#8220;trillion,&#8221; &#8220;banks,&#8221; and &#8220;tax&#8221; are nested more closely to &#8220;economy&#8221; and the President. Aside from new terms like &#8220;socialist&#8221; and &#8220;blame&#8221; found in the Map for the last 100 days, there is a surprising lack of emotionally charged or negative content about the President found in this dataset culled from millions of online messages and posts that mention Obama.</p>
<h3>What A Difference 100 Days Makes &#8211; Other Findings</h3>
<ul>
<li>Post inauguration, radio personality Rush Limbaugh and former President George W. Bush are now the most closely associated to Obama in online conversations. Previously, Arizona Sen. John McCain correlated most closely to Obama.</li>
<li>Discussion about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq &#8211; two topics that produced high-volume, emotionally strong online buzz &#8212; are featured more prominently, and closer together, in the most recent sample surrounded by words like &#8220;terrorists&#8221; and &#8220;troops.&#8221;.</li>
<li>Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is the only foreign leader whose name emerges in correlation with Obama discussion.</li>
<li>CNN is the only media outlet that appears on the map</li>
<li>Obama carries little pre-election &#8220;baggage&#8221; with him into the White House. Questions about his citizenship and Kenyan roots, for example, all but disappear from the mapped discussion once he takes office.</li>
<li>Change, the mantra of his campaign, has moved further out on the map.</li>
</ul>
<p>Click images to enlarge</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/pre100days.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-11155 aligncenter" title="pre100days" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/pre100days-300x278.gif" alt="" width="300" height="278" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/100days.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-11156 aligncenter" title="100days" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/100days-300x269.gif" alt="" width="300" height="269" /></a></p>
<h3><a name="BAM">*About the Brand Association Map</a></h3>
<p><a name="BAM">Similar to a bulls-eye, the BAM determines phrase correlations within a data set of consumer-generated media. A leading concept (brand, issue, personality, etc) is placed in the center of the bulls-eye, and phrases that have a relationship to the leading concept appear within one of the three rings. All words/phrases on the map are significantly correlated to the center term. For ease of viewing, the words are separated on the association map into different categories, as seen in the legend. The closer a word appears to the leading concept in the center of the bulls-eye, the stronger the correlation. Also, groups of phrases that reside together on the map are placed together for relationship purposes.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/first-100-days-economic-crisis-now-tied-to-brand-obama-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real-Time Focus Group Grades Obama&#8217;s Press Conference</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/real-time-focus-group-grades-obamas-press-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/real-time-focus-group-grades-obamas-press-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dial testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Henry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential press conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viewer reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=9585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using dial meters to track their approval in real time, a group of self-identified Democrats, Republicans, and Independents rated President Barack Obama&#8217;s March 24, primetime press conference. Responses were generally split down party lines on major themes and interestingly on the AIG exchange between CNN&#8217;s Ed Henry. Those who identified as Republicans spiked with the question and dropped at the President&#8217;s response, Democrats dropped at the question and spiked at the President&#8217;s terse &#8220;I like to know what I&#8217;m taking about&#8230;&#8221; response.
Video: Obama And CNN&#8217;s Ed Henry

 
Other Findings

Based on ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_dial.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9586" title="obama_dial" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_dial.png" alt="" width="150" height="120" /></a>Using dial meters to track their approval in real time, a group of self-identified Democrats, Republicans, and Independents rated President Barack Obama&#8217;s March 24, primetime press conference. Responses were generally split down party lines on major themes and interestingly on the <a href="http://blogpulse.com/search?query=Ed+Henry+AIG&amp;image22.x=0&amp;image22.y=0" target="_blank">AIG exchange</a> between CNN&#8217;s Ed Henry. Those who identified as Republicans spiked with the question and dropped at the President&#8217;s response, Democrats dropped at the question and spiked at the President&#8217;s terse &#8220;I like to know what I&#8217;m taking about&#8230;&#8221; response.</p>
<h3>Video: Obama And CNN&#8217;s Ed Henry</h3>
<p id="preview1"><script src="/nielsenwire/videos/swfobject.js" type="text/javascript"></script><br />
 <script type="text/javascript"><!--
var s1 = new SWFObject('/nielsenwire/videos/player.swf','player1','400','300','9');
s1.addParam('allowfullscreen','false');
s1.addParam('allowscriptaccess','always');
s1.addParam('flashvars','file=/nielsenwire/videos/obamaclip2.mp4&#038;image=/nielsenwire/videos/nielsen_video_tn.png');
s1.write('preview1');
// --></script></p>
<p><strong>Other Findings</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Based on questions posed before and after the press conference regarding confidence in the President&#8217;s plan, Republicans and Democrats remained generally unmoved, but Independents were swayed in a more positive direction.</li>
<li>Inheriting deficit is a sore spot with Republicans</li>
<li>Both parties agreed criticism of President Obama was not about race</li>
</ul>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">
<h3>View Tracking By Time And Topic</h3>
<p>Click To Enlarge</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_dial_tracking1.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-9588" title="Obama Dial Tracking 1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_dial_tracking1-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></td>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_dial_tracking2.png"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-9589" title="Obama Dial Tracking 2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_dial_tracking2-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/real-time-focus-group-grades-obamas-press-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nearly 37.8 Million Watch President Obama&#8217;s Oath And Speech On TV</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nearly-378-million-watch-president-obamas-oath-and-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nearly-378-million-watch-president-obamas-oath-and-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Nearly 37.8 million Americans watching at home viewed President Barack Obama&#8217;s oath of office and inaugural speech between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET on January 20, 2009.  This is the most viewed inauguration since the record of 41.8 million viewers who watched Ronald Reagan&#8217;s 1981 inauguration.
This is the first inaugural since Nielsen began tracking time-shifted viewing, and this year&#8217;s data is based on Live + Same Day, meaning incremental viewing during the same broadcast day is included.
Download the complete report.




 President
 Date
 HH Rating
 Households
 Viewers ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/obama_portrait_146px1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7286" title="obama_portrait_146px1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/obama_portrait_146px1-146x150.jpg" alt="" width="146" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>Nearly 37.8 million Americans watching at home viewed President Barack Obama&#8217;s oath of office and inaugural speech between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET on January 20, 2009.  This is the most viewed inauguration since the record of 41.8 million viewers who watched Ronald Reagan&#8217;s 1981 inauguration.</p>
<p>This is the first inaugural since Nielsen began tracking time-shifted viewing, and this year&#8217;s data is based on Live + Same Day, meaning incremental viewing during the same broadcast day is included.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/inauguration-national-numbers-jan-20-2009-b.pdf">Download the complete report.<br />
</a></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> President</th>
<th> Date</th>
<th> HH Rating</th>
<th> Households</th>
<th> Viewers P2+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Barack Obama</td>
<td>January 20, 2009 -Tues</td>
<td>25.5</td>
<td>28,906,061</td>
<td>37,793,008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Ronald Reagan</td>
<td>January 20, 1981-Tue</td>
<td>37.4</td>
<td>29,100,000</td>
<td>41,800,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Richard Nixon</td>
<td>January 20, 1969 &#8211; Mon</td>
<td>33.5</td>
<td>18,870,000</td>
<td>27,007,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Jimmy Carter</td>
<td>January 20, 1977-Thu</td>
<td>31.5</td>
<td>22,430,000</td>
<td>34,127,090</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Richard Nixon</td>
<td>January 20, 1973-Sat</td>
<td>28.5</td>
<td>18,470,000</td>
<td>32,950,900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Bill Clinton</td>
<td>January 20, 1993-Wed</td>
<td>24.5</td>
<td>22,758,111</td>
<td>29,721,041</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Ronald Reagan</td>
<td>January 20, 1985-Sun</td>
<td>22.3</td>
<td>18,925,556</td>
<td>25,053,886</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">George W. Bush</td>
<td>January 20, 2001-Sat</td>
<td>20.8</td>
<td>21,346,400</td>
<td>29,008,200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">George H.W. Bush</td>
<td>January 20, 1989-Fri</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>18,106,000</td>
<td>23,316,325</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Bill Clinton</td>
<td>January 20, 1997-Mon</td>
<td>17.1</td>
<td>16,515,000</td>
<td>21,583,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">George W. Bush</td>
<td>January 20, 2005-Thu</td>
<td>11.8</td>
<td>12,928,709</td>
<td>15,536,652</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">© 2009 The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>RELATED: </strong> <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/news-and-video-site-traffic-surges-on-inauguration-day/">Nielsen Online traffic data</a> for News, Current Event, and Video Streaming on Inauguration Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nearly-378-million-watch-president-obamas-oath-and-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Obama Inaugural Events Viewed By 30.1% In Top Markets</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raleigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv viewers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated 01/27: The updated %figures and chart reflect updated data relative to select West Coast markets.
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;
The combined overall household rating for the inauguration of President Barack Obama in the top 56 local television markets where Nielsen maintains TV meters was 30.1%.
The Raleigh-Durham market had the largest TV audience with more than 51% of households tuned in to the day&#8217;s events.






 Rank by HH Rating
 Market Name
 Market  Rank
by Number of TV Households
 Household Rating
% of TV households
in market tuned in


	1	
	Raleigh-Durham (Fayetvlle)	
	27	
	51.2	


	2	
	Washington, DC (Hagrstwn)	
	9	
	47.7	


	3	
	Norfolk-Portsmth-Newpt Nws	
	43	
	46.7	


	4	
	Baltimore	
	26	
	44.3	


	5	
	Greensboro-H.Point-W.Salem	
	46	
	42.3	


	6	
	Charlotte	
	24	
	40.8	


	7	
	West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce	
	38	
	39.6	


	8	
	Memphis	
	48	
	39.4	


	9	
	Richmond-Petersburg	
	58	
	37.2	


	10	
	Greenvll-Spart-Ashevll-And	
	36	
	35.9	


	11	
	Birmingham (Ann and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/obama_portrait_146px.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7281" title="obama_portrait_146px" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/obama_portrait_146px-146x150.jpg" alt="" width="146" height="150" /></a><strong>Updated 01/27: </strong><em>The updated %figures and chart reflect updated data relative to select West Coast markets.</em></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The combined overall household rating for the inauguration of President Barack Obama in the top 56 local television markets where Nielsen maintains TV meters was 30.1%.</p>
<p>The Raleigh-Durham market had the largest TV audience with more than 51% of households tuned in to the day&#8217;s events.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/inauguration-metered-markets-inaugural-revised-with-spill-new.pdf"><br />
</a></p>
<p><span id="more-7319"></span></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Rank by HH Rating</th>
<th> Market Name</th>
<th> Market  Rank<br />
by Number of TV Households</th>
<th> Household Rating<br />
% of TV households<br />
in market tuned in</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Raleigh-Durham (Fayetvlle)	</td>
<td>	27	</td>
<td>	51.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Washington, DC (Hagrstwn)	</td>
<td>	9	</td>
<td>	47.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	Norfolk-Portsmth-Newpt Nws	</td>
<td>	43	</td>
<td>	46.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	Baltimore	</td>
<td>	26	</td>
<td>	44.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Greensboro-H.Point-W.Salem	</td>
<td>	46	</td>
<td>	42.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Charlotte	</td>
<td>	24	</td>
<td>	40.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce	</td>
<td>	38	</td>
<td>	39.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Memphis	</td>
<td>	48	</td>
<td>	39.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Richmond-Petersburg	</td>
<td>	58	</td>
<td>	37.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Greenvll-Spart-Ashevll-And	</td>
<td>	36	</td>
<td>	35.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	11	</td>
<td>	Birmingham (Ann and Tusc)	</td>
<td>	40	</td>
<td>	35.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	12	</td>
<td>	Miami-Ft. Lauderdale	</td>
<td>	16	</td>
<td>	35.5	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	13	</td>
<td>	Knoxville	</td>
<td>	59	</td>
<td>	35.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	14	</td>
<td>	Ft. Myers-Naples	</td>
<td>	62	</td>
<td>	33.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	15	</td>
<td>	Las Vegas	</td>
<td>	42	</td>
<td>	33.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	16	</td>
<td>	Kansas City	</td>
<td>	31	</td>
<td>	32.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	17	</td>
<td>	Philadelphia	</td>
<td>	4	</td>
<td>	32.5	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	18	</td>
<td>	Nashville	</td>
<td>	29	</td>
<td>	31.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	19	</td>
<td>	Columbus, OH	</td>
<td>	32	</td>
<td>	31.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	19	</td>
<td>	New Orleans	</td>
<td>	53	</td>
<td>	31.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	21	</td>
<td>	Buffalo	</td>
<td>	51	</td>
<td>	31.0	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	22	</td>
<td>	Detroit	</td>
<td>	11	</td>
<td>	30.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	22	</td>
<td>	Pittsburgh	</td>
<td>	23	</td>
<td>	30.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	24	</td>
<td>	Providence-New Bedford	</td>
<td>	52	</td>
<td>	30.0	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	25	</td>
<td>	Dayton	</td>
<td>	64	</td>
<td>	29.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	25	</td>
<td>	Indianapolis	</td>
<td>	25	</td>
<td>	29.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	25	</td>
<td>	New York	</td>
<td>	1	</td>
<td>	29.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	28	</td>
<td>	Louisville	</td>
<td>	50	</td>
<td>	29.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	29	</td>
<td>	Atlanta	</td>
<td>	8	</td>
<td>	29.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	29	</td>
<td>	Hartford &#038; New Haven	</td>
<td>	30	</td>
<td>	29.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	31	</td>
<td>	Oklahoma City	</td>
<td>	45	</td>
<td>	29.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	32	</td>
<td>	San Antonio	</td>
<td>	37	</td>
<td>	28.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	33	</td>
<td>	Cincinnati	</td>
<td>	34	</td>
<td>	28.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	33	</td>
<td>	Jacksonville	</td>
<td>	47	</td>
<td>	28.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	35	</td>
<td>	Albuquerque-Santa Fe	</td>
<td>	44	</td>
<td>	28.5	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	36	</td>
<td>	Orlando-Daytona Bch-Melbrn	</td>
<td>	19	</td>
<td>	28.3	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	37	</td>
<td>	San Diego	</td>
<td>	28	</td>
<td>	28.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	38	</td>
<td>	Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota)	</td>
<td>	13	</td>
<td>	28.0	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	39	</td>
<td>	St. Louis	</td>
<td>	21	</td>
<td>	27.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	40	</td>
<td>	Chicago	</td>
<td>	3	</td>
<td>	27.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	41	</td>
<td>	Cleveland-Akron (Canton)	</td>
<td>	17	</td>
<td>	27.2	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	42	</td>
<td>	Houston	</td>
<td>	10	</td>
<td>	26.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	43	</td>
<td>	Los Angeles	</td>
<td>	2	</td>
<td>	26.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	44	</td>
<td>	Portland, OR	</td>
<td>	22	</td>
<td>	25.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	44	</td>
<td>	Sacramnto-Stkton-Modesto	</td>
<td>	20	</td>
<td>	25.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	44	</td>
<td>	San Francisco-Oak-San Jose	</td>
<td>	6	</td>
<td>	25.9	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	47	</td>
<td>	Tulsa	</td>
<td>	61	</td>
<td>	25.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	48	</td>
<td>	Milwaukee	</td>
<td>	35	</td>
<td>	25.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	49	</td>
<td>	Boston (Manchester)	</td>
<td>	7	</td>
<td>	25.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	49	</td>
<td>	Seattle-Tacoma	</td>
<td>	14	</td>
<td>	25.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	51	</td>
<td>	Austin	</td>
<td>	49	</td>
<td>	25.1	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	52	</td>
<td>	Dallas-Ft. Worth	</td>
<td>	5	</td>
<td>	24.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	53	</td>
<td>	Salt Lake City	</td>
<td>	33	</td>
<td>	23.7	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	54	</td>
<td>	Minneapolis-St. Paul	</td>
<td>	15	</td>
<td>	23.6	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	55	</td>
<td>	Phoenix (Prescott)	</td>
<td>	12	</td>
<td>	22.4	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	56	</td>
<td>	Denver	</td>
<td>	18	</td>
<td>	21.8	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">©2009 The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>See previous ratings for presidential elections <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Nixon To Bush 43: Presidential Inauguration Ratings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, January 20th, Americans will witness history with the inauguration of the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama.  How will this event compare with other inaugurations over the past 40 years?  Nielsen has compiled data about inaugural viewership since 1969.
Key findings are:

Ronald      Reagan&#8217;s 1981 inauguration drew the most viewers &#8211; almost 42 million.


First      time inaugurations of two-term presidents drew higher ratings than their      second (exception: Nixon in 1973).


The     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/white-house.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7247" title="white-house" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/white-house-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="94" /></a>On Tuesday, January 20th, Americans will witness history with the inauguration of the 44<sup>th</sup> President of the United States, Barack Obama.  How will this event compare with other inaugurations over the past 40 years?  Nielsen has compiled data about inaugural viewership since 1969.</p>
<p>Key findings are:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Ronald      Reagan&#8217;s 1981 inauguration drew the most viewers &#8211; almost 42 million.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>First      time inaugurations of two-term presidents drew higher ratings than their      second (exception: Nixon in 1973).</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The      least watched inauguration since 1969: George W. Bush in 2005, with 15.5      million.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/presidential-inauguration-1969-20051.pdf">Click this link for complete inauguration ratings 1969-2005</a></p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> PRESIDENT</th>
<th> DATE</th>
<th> Viewers P2+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">G.W.Bush</td>
<td>1/20/2005</td>
<td>15,536,652</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">G.W.Bush</td>
<td>1/20/2001</td>
<td>29,008,200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton</td>
<td>1/20/1997</td>
<td>21,583,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton</td>
<td>1/20/1993</td>
<td>29,721,041</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">G.H.Bush</td>
<td>1/20/1989</td>
<td>23,316,325</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Reagan</td>
<td>1/20/1985</td>
<td>25,053,886</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Reagan</td>
<td>1/20/1981</td>
<td>41,800,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Carter</td>
<td>1/20/1977</td>
<td>34,127,090</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Nixon</td>
<td>1/20/1973</td>
<td>32,950,900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Nixon</td>
<td>1/20/1969</td>
<td>27,007,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: © 2009 The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/from-nixon-to-bush-43-presidential-inauguration-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Tunes Into DTV Chatter On The Web</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-tunes-into-dtv-chatter-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-tunes-into-dtv-chatter-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Television Transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTV Buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the shift to Digital Television on the horizon, Nielsen Online has been tracking the online conversation, seeking out the top blogs talking DTV. The topic has seen a significant spike of late, starting back in October following Nielsen&#8217;s initial readiness announcement. Recently, Barack Obama&#8217;s comments about extending the DTV deadline prompted another conversation spike in early January.


Top 10 blogs discussing DTV-related topics between October 1, 2008 and January  11, 2009





 RANK
 NAME


1
PaidContent


2
Engadget


3
The Huffington Post


4
Ask MetaFilter


5
Techdirt


6
Slashdot


7
Chris Pirillo


8
Cinematical


9
I4U News


10
Krunker


Source: Nielsen Online





What we talk about when we talk about DTV
As bloggers ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7236" title="dtv_wordle_sm" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dtv_wordle_sm.png" alt="" width="150" height="83" />With the shift to Digital Television on the horizon, Nielsen Online has been tracking the online conversation, seeking out the top blogs talking DTV. The topic has seen a significant spike of late, starting back in October following Nielsen&#8217;s initial <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/media/2008/pr_081015.html">readiness announcement</a>. Recently, Barack Obama&#8217;s comments about extending the DTV deadline prompted another conversation spike in early January.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dtv_buzz1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7239" title="DTV Buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dtv_buzz1.png" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-7227"></span></p>
<h3>Top 10 blogs discussing DTV-related topics between October 1, 2008 and January  11, 2009</h3>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<div>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> NAME</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td><a href="http://www.paidcontent.org" target="_blank">PaidContent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td><a href="http://www.engadget.com " target="_blank">Engadget</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com" target="_blank">The Huffington Post</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td><a href="http://ask.metafilter.com " target="_blank">Ask MetaFilter</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td><a href="http://www.techdirt.com " target="_blank">Techdirt</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td><a href="http://slashdot.org " target="_blank">Slashdot</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td><a href="http://chris.pirillo.com " target="_blank">Chris Pirillo</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td><a href="http://www.cinematical.com " target="_blank">Cinematical</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td><a href="http://www.i4u.com " target="_blank">I4U News</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td><a href="http://www.krunker.com/" target="_blank">Krunker</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: Nielsen Online</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<h3>What we talk about when we talk about DTV</h3>
<p>As bloggers and consumers dive into DTV, certain keywords emerge surrounding their discussions. This cloud shows (by size) the words most closely associated or frequently mentioned with the topic.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dtv_wordle.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7235" title="dtv_wordle" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dtv_wordle.png" alt="" width="500" height="352" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-tunes-into-dtv-chatter-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
