<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; AOL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>January 2011: Top U.S. Web Brands and News Sites</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top U.S. Web brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As in December 2010, the same brands were featured amongst the 10 most popular online in the U.S. in January 2011 except for Wikipedia replacing Amazon (now 11th). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As in December 2010, the same brands were featured amongst the 10 most popular online in the U.S. in January 2011 except for Wikipedia replacing Amazon (now 11th). There was also only one change to the brands featuring compared to the same period a year ago, January 2010, with Ask Search Network replacing Fox Interactive Media, whose stable of sites includes MySpace and Photobucket. </p>
<p>Amongst January 2011&#8217;s U.S. top 10, Wikipedia (+6.7%) and MSN (+4.2%) saw the greatest monthly increase in Unique Visitors through PCs/laptops from home and work locations.</p>
<p>While Facebook, by some way, had the highest average time per person, Ask Search Network saw the greatest gain in monthly time spent, with the average visitor spending just under 11 minutes, up 16.4% from December 2010.  Wikipedia, Facebook and Google shared similar growth in time spent, up 6.8%, 6.6% and 6%, respectively.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="6">	Top 10 U.S. Web Brands for January 2011 (Home and Work Locations)											</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	Rank	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Unique Audience (000)	</th>
<th>	Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in UA	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in Time PP	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Google	</td>
<td>	153,623	</td>
<td>	     1:21:00	</td>
<td>	-0.1%	</td>
<td>	6.0%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Facebook	</td>
<td>	135,622	</td>
<td>	     7:24:12	</td>
<td>	0.0%	</td>
<td>	6.6%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	Yahoo!	</td>
<td>	130,854	</td>
<td>	     2:20:10	</td>
<td>	-1.1%	</td>
<td>	2.1%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	MSN/WindowsLive/Bing	</td>
<td>	121,019	</td>
<td>	     1:26:39	</td>
<td>	4.2%	</td>
<td>	-0.8%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	YouTube	</td>
<td>	103,868	</td>
<td>	     1:21:54	</td>
<td>	-1.9%	</td>
<td>	-0.1%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Microsoft	</td>
<td>	90,221	</td>
<td>	     0:41:53	</td>
<td>	-0.2%	</td>
<td>	-3.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	AOL Media Network	</td>
<td>	76,173	</td>
<td>	     1:58:31	</td>
<td>	0.0%	</td>
<td>	-0.2%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Wikipedia	</td>
<td>	65,698	</td>
<td>	     0:15:31	</td>
<td>	6.7%	</td>
<td>	6.8%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Ask Search Network	</td>
<td>	65,454	</td>
<td>	     0:10:40	</td>
<td>	0.3%	</td>
<td>	16.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Apple	</td>
<td>	63,296	</td>
<td>	     1:18:48	</td>
<td>	-6.2%	</td>
<td>	-6.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Source: The Nielsen Company											</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Read as: During January 2011, 153.6 million unique U.S. people visited Google using PC/laptops from home and work locations 											</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart --></p>
<p>When looking at the ten most popular Current Events and Global News sites, each saw month-over-month growth in their audience, as is often the case between December and January.  Yahoo! News was the top site in the category with 46.3 million unique U.S. visitors, up 6% from December 2010.  Yahoo! was followed by CNN Digital Network (+15%) and MSNBC Digital Network (+15.7%), both with double-digit gains in visitors.</p>
<p>Acquired by AOL earlier in the week, The Huffington Post was the #9 news site in January drawing 13.3 million unique visitors who averaged nearly 12 minutes on the site.  Huff Post’s new sister site &#8211; AOL News &#8211; ranked #4 with 22.1 million unique visitors from home/work computers.</p>
<p>Although the Huff Post is now part of the same stable as AOL News, there was already some overlap amongst their audiences. In January 2011, 27% of US visitors to AOL News also visited Huff Post, while 44% of visitors to Huff Post also visited AOL News in that same month.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="6">	Top 10 U.S. Current Events &#038; Global News Sites for January 2011 (Home &#038; Work)											</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	Rank	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Unique Audience (000)	</th>
<th>	Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in UA	</th>
<th>	MOM % Change in Time PP	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Yahoo! News	</td>
<td>	46,274	</td>
<td>	0:14:54	</td>
<td>	6.0%	</td>
<td>	22.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	CNN Digital Network	</td>
<td>	37,008	</td>
<td>	0:22:37	</td>
<td>	15.0%	</td>
<td>	22.7%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	MSNBC Digital Network	</td>
<td>	32,494	</td>
<td>	0:16:36	</td>
<td>	15.7%	</td>
<td>	13.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	AOL News	</td>
<td>	22,060	</td>
<td>	0:14:00	</td>
<td>	3.9%	</td>
<td>	0.2%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Tribune Newspapers	</td>
<td>	16,929	</td>
<td>	0:10:10	</td>
<td>	21.7%	</td>
<td>	3.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Fox News Digital Network	</td>
<td>	16,652	</td>
<td>	0:19:14	</td>
<td>	16.0%	</td>
<td>	-1.8%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	NYTimes.com	</td>
<td>	15,503	</td>
<td>	0:15:15	</td>
<td>	24.0%	</td>
<td>	8.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	ABCNEWS Digital Network	</td>
<td>	14,551	</td>
<td>	0:05:55	</td>
<td>	11.2%	</td>
<td>	0.6%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	TheHuffingtonPost.com	</td>
<td>	13,266	</td>
<td>	0:11:39	</td>
<td>	12.0%	</td>
<td>	-18.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Gannett Newspapers and Newspaper Division	</td>
<td>	12,763	</td>
<td>	0:18:04	</td>
<td>	20.4%	</td>
<td>	22.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Source: The Nielsen Company											</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Read as: During January 2011, 46.3 million unique U.S. people visited Yahoo! News using PC/laptops from home and work locations											</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">	Note: The &#8220;Current Events &#038; Global News&#8221; category does not include financial news sites such as Wall Street Journal, Reuters, etc.  These sites are in a separate &#8220;Finanical News &#038; Info&#8221; category											</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart --></p>
<p>When looking at overall computer and Internet usage, U.S. Internet users spent more time online (+10%), visited more domains (+5.3%), engaged in more sessions (+3.5%) and viewed more pages (+3.5%) during January than they did last month.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="4">	Average U.S. Internet Usage for January 2011 (Home &#038; Work)							</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	Metrics	</th>
<th>	Current Month	</th>
<th>	Previous Month	</th>
<th>	% Change	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Sessions/Visits per Person	</td>
<td>	59	</td>
<td>	57	</td>
<td>	3.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Domains Visited per Person	</td>
<td>	99	</td>
<td>	94	</td>
<td>	5.3%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Web Page Views per Person	</td>
<td>	2,750	</td>
<td>	2,656	</td>
<td>	3.5%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	PC Time per Person	</td>
<td>	    61:27:19	</td>
<td>	    55:53:03	</td>
<td>	10.0%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Duration of a Web Page viewed	</td>
<td>	     0:00:58	</td>
<td>	     0:00:55	</td>
<td>	3.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Active Digital Media Universe	</td>
<td>	197,842,270	</td>
<td>	198,595,819	</td>
<td>	-0.4%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	Current Digital Media Universe Estimate	</td>
<td>	242,999,000	</td>
<td>	240,813,000	</td>
<td>	0.9%	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">	Source: The Nielsen Company							</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Reports March 2010 U.S. Search Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-march-2010-u-s-search-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-march-2010-u-s-search-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported March 2010 data for the top U.S. Search Providers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported March 2010 data for the top U.S. Search Providers.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Search Providers for March 2010, Ranked by Searches (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Searches (000)</th>
<th>Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>9,716,488</td>
<td>100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>6,387,932</td>
<td>65.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,304,427</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live/Bing Search</td>
<td>1,183,268</td>
<td>12.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>245,810</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>183,975</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search Search</td>
<td>120,713</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>52,011</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>WhitePages.com Network Search</td>
<td>29,868</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>28,633</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>23,857</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Searches represent the total number of queries conducted at the provider. Example: An estimated 6.4 billion search queries were conducted at Google Search, representing 65.7 percent of all search queries conducted during the given time period.</p>
<p><em>Note</em>: MegaView Search data – including total searches, unique searchers, search share, and all other search figures – cannot be trended with search results prior to October 2009 due to recent methodology changes.<strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-march-2010-u-s-search-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Reports February 2010 U.S. Search Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-february-2010-u-s-search-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-february-2010-u-s-search-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported February 2010 data for the top U.S. Search Providers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported February 2010 data for the top U.S. Search Providers.<br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Search Providers for February 2010, Ranked by Searches (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Provider</th>
<th> Searches (000)</th>
<th> Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>9,174,408</td>
<td>100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>5,980,116</td>
<td>65.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,294,261</td>
<td>14.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live/Bing Search</td>
<td>1,142,344</td>
<td>12.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>206,969</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>175,074</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search Search</td>
<td>91,288</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>55,122</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>27,002</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>26,461</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>WhitePages.com Network Search</td>
<td>24,681</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Searches represent the total number of queries conducted at the provider. Example: An estimated 6.0 billion search queries were conducted at Google Search, representing 65.2 percent of all search queries conducted during the given time period.</p>
<p><em> </em><em>Note</em>: MegaView Search data – including total searches, unique searchers, search share, and all other search figures – cannot be trended with search results prior to October 2009 due to recent methodology changes.<span id="_marker"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; mso-outline-level: 1; tab-stops: 103.5pt;"><em>Updated April 2010</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-february-2010-u-s-search-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Web Searches Top 10.2 Billion in January</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/u-s-web-searches-top-10-2-billion-in-january/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/u-s-web-searches-top-10-2-billion-in-january/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported January 2010 data for the top U.S. Search Providers. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported January 2010 data for the top U.S. Search Providers.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Search Providers for January 2010, Ranked by Searches (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Searches (000)</th>
<th>Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>10,272,099</td>
<td>100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>6,805,424</td>
<td>66.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,488,476</td>
<td>14.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live/Bing Search</td>
<td>1,116,546</td>
<td>10.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>251,762</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>194,161</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search</td>
<td>112,356</td>
<td>1.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>59,608</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>35,101</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>34,736</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>BizRate Search</td>
<td>20,123</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Searches represent the total number of queries conducted at the provider. Example: An estimated 6.8 billion search queries were conducted at Google Search, representing 66.3 percent of all search queries conducted during the given time period.</p>
<p>MegaView Search data – including total searches, unique searchers, search share, and all other search figures – cannot be trended with search results prior to October 2009 due to recent methodology changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/u-s-web-searches-top-10-2-billion-in-january/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Reports December U.S. Search Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-december-u-s-search-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-december-u-s-search-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported December 2009 data for the top U.S. Search Providers. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported December 2009 data for the top U.S. Search Providers.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Search Providers for December 2009, Ranked by Searches (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Searches (000)</th>
<th>Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"> </td>
<td>All Search</td>
<td>9,945,576</td>
<td>100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>6,697,223</td>
<td>67.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,434,866</td>
<td>14.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live/Bing Search</td>
<td>986,247</td>
<td>9.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>247,421</td>
<td>2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>168,674</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search</td>
<td>99,474</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>50,325</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>41,393</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>BizRate Search</td>
<td>31,612</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>27,914</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Searches represent the total number of queries conducted at the provider. Example:  An estimated 6.7 billion search queries were conducted at Google Search, representing 67.3 percent of all search queries conducted during the given time period.</p>
<p>*November and December U.S. search figures reflect dictionary changes <!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-reports-december-u-s-search-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Online Search Providers: November 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-online-search-providers-november-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-online-search-providers-november-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=18729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 10 billion online searches were performed in the U.S. during the month of November.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported November 2009 data for the top U.S. Search Providers.</p>
<p>MegaView Search data – including total searches, unique searchers, search share, and all other search figures – cannot be trended with search results prior to October 2009 due to recent methodology changes.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Search Providers for November 2009, Ranked by Searches (U.S.)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Searches (000)</th>
<th>Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"></td>
<td>Total</td>
<td>10,002,458</td>
<td>100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google Search</td>
<td>6,546,172</td>
<td>65.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,525,964</td>
<td>15.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live/Bing Search</td>
<td>1,073,416</td>
<td>10.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AOL Search</td>
<td>280,311</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Ask.com Search</td>
<td>177,589</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>My Web Search Search</td>
<td>101,586</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Comcast Search</td>
<td>47,746</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>NexTag Search</td>
<td>34,314</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>BizRate Search</td>
<td>29,044</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>25,260</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Searches represent the total number of queries conducted at the provider. Example:  An estimated 6.5 billion search queries were conducted at Google Search, representing 65.4 percent of all search queries conducted during the given time period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-online-search-providers-november-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Web Brands and Parent Companies for October 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=17889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company today reported October 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company today reported October 2009 data for the Top Parent Companies/Divisions and Top Web Brands, as well as average Internet usage.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Parent Companies/Divisions for October 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>Parent Company</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>156,635</td>
<td>2:34:50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>138,773</td>
<td>2:06:16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>134,745</td>
<td>3:06:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>107,482</td>
<td>6:09:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL LLC</td>
<td>91,205</td>
<td>2:30:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>News Corp. Online</td>
<td>79,817</td>
<td>1:28:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>InterActiveCorp</td>
<td>71,310</td>
<td>0:16:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>66,191</td>
<td>1:25:29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>63,372</td>
<td>0:26:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Wikimedia Foundation</td>
<td>62,084</td>
<td>0:17:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Example:  The data indicates that 62.1 million home and work Internet users visited at least one of the Wikimedia Foundation-owned sites or launched a Wikimedia Foundation-owned application during the month, and each person spent, on average, a total of 17 minutes and 7 seconds at one or more of their sites or applications.</p>
<p>The parent level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs owned by a single company or division. The brand level is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.<span id="_marker"><br />
</span><br />
<!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Web Brands for October 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>147,861</td>
<td>1:53:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>133,537</td>
<td>3:06:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>112,340</td>
<td>1:57:40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>107,482</td>
<td>6:09:48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>93,824</td>
<td>0:45:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>91,205</td>
<td>2:30:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>90,396</td>
<td>1:12:41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>61,987</td>
<td>1:44:08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>61,881</td>
<td>0:17:03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>59,580</td>
<td>1:14:14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home &amp; Work, Month of October 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Metrics</th>
<th> Oct-09</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Pages per Person</td>
<td>2,645</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>67:49:39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page Viewed</td>
<td>0:00:58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>196,637,941</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>233,964,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-u-s-web-brands-and-parent-companies-for-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Display Ad Spend Of Consumer Goods Up 57% Since 2007</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online ad impressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image-based online ad spending by consumer goods companies increased 57 percent over the last two years, growing from $99.8 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $156.2 million in the same quarter in 2009, according to new Nielsen research.
Quarter-over-Quarter Growth in Online Display Ad Spend by U.S. Consumer Goods Industry



Quarter
Estimated Spend
Quarter-over-Quarter Growth


Q1 2007
99,814,750
n/a


Q1 2008
122,785,505
23%


Q1 2009
156,221,975
27%


Source: Nielsen AdRelevance



&#8220;While direct response advertising has been very successful on the Internet, with categories like finance and travel devoting a significant portion of their budget to online advertising, on-line advertising will not continue to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image-based online ad spending by consumer goods companies increased 57 percent over the last two years, growing from $99.8 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $156.2 million in the same quarter in 2009, according to new Nielsen research.</p>
<p><strong>Quarter-over-Quarter Growth in Online Display Ad Spend by U.S. Consumer Goods Industry</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Quarter</th>
<th>Estimated Spend</th>
<th>Quarter-over-Quarter Growth</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Q1 2007</td>
<td>99,814,750</td>
<td>n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Q1 2008</td>
<td>122,785,505</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Q1 2009</td>
<td>156,221,975</td>
<td>27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen AdRelevance</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#8220;While direct response advertising has been very successful on the Internet, with categories like finance and travel devoting a significant portion of their budget to online advertising, on-line advertising will not continue to grow as rapidly without major brands beginning to devote larger portions of their ad budgets to the Web.  We are seeing some of that happen now with Consumer Packaged Goods companies, which are growing their budgets despite a down economy,&#8221; said David Wiesenfeld, vice president, online marketing solutions at Nielsen.</p>
<p>YouTube was the top entertainment web site for consumer product companies in 2009, with 637.7 million display ad impressions and a 24 percent share of all advertising in the genre.  AOL.com and Oprah.com rounded out the top three.  YouTube was also the fastest growing site among the top 10, increasing 572 percent year-over-year.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Site</th>
<th>Q1 &#8216;08 Image-Based Ad Impressions (000)</th>
<th>Q1 &#8216;09 Image-Based Ad Impressions (000)</th>
<th>Y-O-Y % Growth</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">YouTube</td>
<td>94,939</td>
<td>637,727</td>
<td>572%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL.com</td>
<td>115,746</td>
<td>323,142</td>
<td>179%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Oprah.com</td>
<td>129,027</td>
<td>202,815</td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">IMDb</td>
<td>516,138</td>
<td>162,598</td>
<td>-68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo!</td>
<td>93,850</td>
<td>161,809</td>
<td>72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Perezhilton.com</td>
<td>n/a</td>
<td>132,862</td>
<td>n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NBC</td>
<td>229,551</td>
<td>116,000</td>
<td>-49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ABC</td>
<td>73,426</td>
<td>96,145</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">People.com</td>
<td>110,967</td>
<td>74,851</td>
<td>-33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MSN</td>
<td>161,890</td>
<td>69,866</td>
<td>-57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen AdRelevance</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Read the full release regarding consumer product online display ads <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pr_090617.pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. Online Search Providers: May 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen Online today reported data for the top U.S. search providers, ranked by total searches, the top companies/divisions and web brands in May 2009.  Total searches increased 20 percent over May 2008.
Top 10 Search Providers for May 2009 (U.S.) 



Provider
Searches (000)
YOY Growth
Share of Searches


All Search
9,440,467
20.3%
100.0%


Google Search
5,968,840
28.2%
63.2%


Yahoo! Search
1,625,253
22.3%
17.2%


MSN/Windows Live Search
891,502
-14.6%
9.4%


AOL Search
364,784
13.1%
3.9%


Ask.com Search
205,438
21.9%
2.2%


My Web Search
77,283
44.7%
0.8%


Comcast Search
55,853
33.1%
0.6%


Yellow Pages Search
33,141
n/a*
0.4%


NexTag Search
27,189
29.9%
0.3%


AT&#38;T Worldnet Search
17,719
-32.4%
0.2%


Source: Nielsen MegaView Search



 * A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.
Google topped the list of top 10 web brands, with a unique audience of 131.2 million.  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen Online today reported data for the top U.S. search providers, ranked by total searches, the top companies/divisions and web brands in May 2009.  Total searches increased 20 percent over May 2008.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Top 10 Search Providers for May 2009 (U.S.)</strong> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Searches (000)</th>
<th>YOY Growth</th>
<th>Share of Searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">All Search</td>
<td>9,440,467</td>
<td>20.3%</td>
<td>100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Google Search</td>
<td>5,968,840</td>
<td>28.2%</td>
<td>63.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo! Search</td>
<td>1,625,253</td>
<td>22.3%</td>
<td>17.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MSN/Windows Live Search</td>
<td>891,502</td>
<td>-14.6%</td>
<td>9.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Search</td>
<td>364,784</td>
<td>13.1%</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Ask.com Search</td>
<td>205,438</td>
<td>21.9%</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">My Web Search</td>
<td>77,283</td>
<td>44.7%</td>
<td>0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Comcast Search</td>
<td>55,853</td>
<td>33.1%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yellow Pages Search</td>
<td>33,141</td>
<td>n/a*</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NexTag Search</td>
<td>27,189</td>
<td>29.9%</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AT&amp;T Worldnet Search</td>
<td>17,719</td>
<td>-32.4%</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen MegaView Search</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em> * A year-over-year comparison is not possible because of a definitional change to Yellow Pages Search.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-12797"></span>Google topped the list of top 10 web brands, with a unique audience of 131.2 million.  Yahoo! took second place, with a unique audience of 118.9 million, followed by MSN/Windows Live at 101.5 million. </p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Average U.S. Internet Usage, Combined Home &amp; Work, May 2009</th>
<th> </th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>104</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Pages per Person</td>
<td>2,352</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Duration of a Web Page Viewed</td>
<td>0:00:56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">PC Time per Person</td>
<td>67:39:05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Active Digital Media Universe</td>
<td>168,670,941</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Current Digital Media Universe Estimate</td>
<td>230,530,606</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen NetView</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Read the full press release <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/may-search-release-616.pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-online-search-providers-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL Time Warner Split Triples their Buzz</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-time-warner-split-triples-their-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-time-warner-split-triples-their-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=12214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As news came out about Time Warner&#8217;s decision to split with AOL, blogs were buzzing, with most in consensus that this could be a great move for both AOL and Time Warner. Many blogs discussed how AOL, under the new leadership of Tim Armstrong, could definitely make headway as an independent company. With all of the buzz surrounding the subject, conversations have already more than tripled today compared to yesterday, increasing from less than .01 percent on Wednesday the 27th to .05 percent by the end of the work day ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As news came out about Time Warner&#8217;s decision to split with AOL, blogs were buzzing, with most in consensus that this could be a great move for both AOL and Time Warner. Many blogs discussed how AOL, under the new leadership of Tim Armstrong, could definitely make headway as an independent company. With all of the buzz surrounding the subject, conversations have already more than tripled today compared to yesterday, increasing from less than .01 percent on Wednesday the 27th to .05 percent by the end of the work day on Thursday.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aolbuzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12215" title="aol buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aolbuzz.png" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a><br />
<span id="more-12214"></span></p>
<h3>AOL: It Has Staying Power</h3>
<p>During the dot.com era the AOL brand was synonymous with the Web for many users and was known for its dial-up access. Now that most users have transitioned to broadband access, AOL has made a name for itself through its media network that includes sites like TMZ. In April 2009, AOL LLC had 86.8 million unique visitors, making it the No. 4 online parent company, reaching 52 percent of the active Internet universe. Among the top 10 parent companies, AOL was No. 1 when ranked by average time spent per person, with 3 hours and 45 minutes.</p>
<p>Globally, the AOL parent company ranked No. 6 in April, with 132.2 million unique visitors.</p>
<h3>Top 10 Parent Companies Ranked by Unique Audience for April 2009 (U.S., Home and Work)</h3>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aol_chart1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12217" title="aol_chart1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aol_chart1.png" alt="" width="457" height="236" /></a></p>
<p>Source: Nielsen NetView</p>
<h3>Top 10 Global* Parent Companies Ranked by Unique Audience for April 2009 (Home and Work)</h3>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aol_chart2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12218" title="aol_chart2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aol_chart2.png" alt="" width="457" height="259" /></a></p>
<p>*Global Data takes into account the following countries: U.S., U.K., Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Brazil, Australia, Switzerland and Japan<br />
Source: Nielsen NetView</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-time-warner-split-triples-their-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

